Transcript Highlights:

• our nature's water factory, capturing rain, filtering pollutants, and ensuring a steady supply of clean
• our nature's water factory, capturing rain, filtering pollutants, and ensuring a steady supply of clean
• pollutants and ensuring a steady supply pollutants and ensuring a steady supply of<00:21:10.120><c> clean
• water without them the very of clean water without them the very Foundation<00:21:12.880><c> of</c><
• choices we make now will determine whether our children and grandchildren continue to have access to clean

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Since the bill was introduced, nine new claims have been added, for a total of 17 claims for a total
• With the new claims, there are a total of 17 claims for a total amount of $5,091,200.
• Since the bill was introduced, nine new claims have been added, for a total of 17 claims for a total
• With the new claims, there are a total of 17 claims for a total amount of $5,091,200.
• </c> bill was introduced um nine new claims bill was introduced um nine new claims have<01:05:48.000>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee met on February 12 at 2 p.m. and heard several measures related to corrections, re-entry, law enforcement, retirement benefits, and gun violence prevention. On HB 10002, which would extend the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission coordinator’s term and clarify unannounced inspection authority, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said it had no objection to the term length or to 24/7 unannounced access. The commission’s chair, Commissioner Mark Patterson, asked for a longer term, saying the commission needs more time and stability to manage reform efforts after years without staff during COVID. Community Alliance on Prisons and Carolyn Eaton also supported a longer term, with both suggesting six years would better insulate the position from politics. The chair noted he had asked Chair Bot for background on the prior committee’s changes and said that could be discussed during decision-making. The committee then heard HB 67, which would require DCR to help inmates obtain civil identification documents such as IDs, birth certificates, and Social Security cards as soon as practicable, including for people in furlough or community placement programs. DCR said it supported the bill and described ongoing work with the city and county on ID machines and with agencies on certificates and Social Security cards. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Oversight Commission, Community Alliance on Prisons, and the Office of Public Defense all supported the measure, emphasizing that identification is essential for housing, employment, and successful re-entry and noting the disproportionate impact of incarceration on Native Hawaiians. On HB 1183, which would classify certain law enforcement administrators and Department of Law Enforcement employees as Class A members for retirement purposes, the Department of Human Resources Development, the Employees’ Retirement System, and the Department of Law Enforcement all supported the bill. DHRD said it would help recruitment and retention, ERS said it had technical amendments to suggest, and DLE said the change would help with succession planning and allow the governor to appoint the most qualified leader. The committee also heard HB 1045, an emergency appropriation bill to cover payroll fringe benefits for Department of Law Enforcement personnel after salary funding had been shifted to other departments; Budget and Finance and DLE explained the need for the supplemental funding, and no opposition was noted. Finally, the committee took up HB 664, which would create an Office of Gun Violence Prevention, a grant program, a resource bank, and a special fund. The Attorney General recommended adding standards for grant awards and warned of overlap with the existing Gun Violence and Violent Crimes Commission, suggesting consolidation and repeal of the older commission to avoid duplication. Supporters included the Brady Campaign, Everytown for Gun Safety, Moms Demand Action Hawaii, a physician, and an Army veteran, who argued the office would centralize data, coordinate prevention efforts, and help secure outside funding. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting 37 supporters, nine opponents, and three commenters, but no vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• I lost track of which line it's on, but I do think that language is cleaned up and is a much better way
• But I do think that language is cleaned up and is a much better way of approaching the issue.
• to attorneys' fees, similar to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a lot of unsubstantiated claims
• </c><02:48:08.160><c> similar</c><02:48:08.479><c> to</c> a claim to attorneys fees. similar to a claim
• </c><02:48:13.920><c> against</c> a lot of unsubstantiated claims against a lot of unsubstantiated claims

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• over 100,000 American lives in claiming over 100,000 American lives in just<00:34:52.000><c> in</c>
• 10, yes. tried to recoup payment on a previously tried to recoup payment on a previously submitted claim
• that is what we all worked on this claim that is what we all worked on this committee<00:56:44.240><
• Chair, to working with you and anyone else to get the bill cleaned up so it's ready.
• Chair, to working with you and anyone else to get the bill cleaned up so it's ready.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we hear cases that claim violation of administrative rule, even state employees if they have a...
• c><00:23:53.039><c> hear</c><00:23:53.799><c> cases</c><00:23:54.799><c> that</c><00:23:55.320><c> claim
• </c> rules so we hear cases that claim rules so we hear cases that claim violation<00:23:56.919><c> of
• So there are other things that are coming, like the YDC claims and other budgetary pressures.
• And so, you know, just to make it clean, you know what I mean? I would...

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard from the Personnel Appeals Board, which explained that it became an independent state agency after Senate Bill 487 and was presenting its first standalone operating budget. The board described its quasi-judicial role in hearing appeals from classified state employees over disciplinary actions such as warnings, suspensions, and terminations, and said it handles about 25 to 35 cases a year, with some cases lasting longer because of their complexity. Members also outlined the need for a chair and vice chair who are attorneys, the board’s current staffing and space needs, and its plan to move away from reliance on Administrative Services for office support and website functions. The board requested about $353,500 for fiscal year 2026, including startup costs, routine operating expenses, and two new part-time positions: a program director and a paralegal. Members said the budget reflects the new independent status, includes funding for only four board members rather than the authorized five, and is designed to avoid full-time staffing costs and benefits. Legislators asked about the cost per case, the board’s relationship to DAS, whether appeals must go through the board before court, and how often cases are appealed further. The board said appeals must first go through it, that court appeals are infrequent but have increased recently, and that the board’s process is intended to resolve disputes more quickly and less expensively than court litigation. Committee members also asked about the board’s caseload, outcomes, and staffing. The board said that in the prior year there were 22 cases, with four decisions overturned in favor of employees, nine dismissals, and nine settlements, and that many disputes are resolved before reaching the board through a multi-step internal process. A member noted the governor and council had recently approved a new board member and were expected to approve a fifth soon. The discussion ended with questions about the board’s website and records access, which members said would need to be moved from Administrative Services as part of the agency’s transition. The committee then moved to the New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities. The executive director explained that the council is 100 percent federally funded under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act and develops a five-year plan to address the needs of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. She said the council works with state agencies and advocacy organizations on quality-of-life issues, accessibility, voter rights training, and plain-language or easy-to-read materials, and that 60 percent of its membership must be individuals with disabilities or family members/guardians. She also described the council’s funding structure, including reimbursement to the state for operating costs, and noted that it currently has three full-time and three part-time positions, with no new positions requested but one full-time position being eliminated and replaced after a pandemic-era staffing change did not work out as planned.

Transcript Highlights:

• planning for the future is resolving our Indian water rights settlements and resolving the water rights claims
• Right now, we're working on negotiating their claims from Cochiti to Isleta.
• We have some more momentum to ensure, similarly, for some water rights claims in Utah that the Navajo
• We have almost 700 million for Owinge's claims on the Rio Chava, over 700 million. So we have.
• We are trying the claims of the Navajo Nation within the Zuni River Store system.

Transcript Highlights:

• then when our representative from the department and state epidemiologists sometimes testify, they claim
• then when our representative from the department and state epidemiologists sometimes testify, they claim
• then when our representative from the department and state epidemiologists sometimes testify, they claim
• then when our representative from the department and state epidemiologists sometimes testify, they claim
• They claim otherwise, that it was COVID that was seen causing diabetes in kids.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy met briefly without a quorum because many members were tied up in legislative committee of conference work. The chair said the committee would resume in June and, in the meantime, directed members to the committee webpage and the 2024 committee’s report and COVID-19 after-action report, which he said could be reviewed for possible updates and legislative recommendations on how New Hampshire should respond to future pandemics. The chair then introduced two recent articles as framing material: one about the U.S. Supreme Court declining to hear a challenge to the Los Angeles Unified School District’s COVID vaccine mandate, and another about CDC internal emails and alleged failure to publicly acknowledge vaccine safety signals. He argued these examples raised concerns about mandates, transparency, and the balance between individual rights and public health, and said the committee would revisit the issue in future meetings. Representative Pollazok thanked the chair for presenting both legal and medical perspectives and suggested the committee focus on reviewing scientific methodology and the quality of evidence behind competing claims. A member asked whether vaccine pamphlets now include risks and benefits, and the chair responded that FDA-approved products should have patient inserts available on the FDA website, including sections listing adverse events from clinical studies and commercial use. He said he would research and email the committee copies or excerpts. Members also discussed how to evaluate studies over different time periods, dosing levels, and the timing of side effects, as well as the difficulty of comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated outcomes when definitions change over time. Before adjourning, the chair said the committee would ask the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services how it would monitor and assess vaccine or pandemic-related issues in real time and whether additional structures would be needed in a future emergency. He said the committee would likely take July and August off, resume in September, and aim to have a draft report by mid-October and a final report by late October ahead of the November elections.

Transcript Highlights:

• They said it takes an average of 37 emails to resolve each claim.
• And then of the claims that they've won, only 30% have been paid.
• process the claim.
• For instance, we will look and see how many IDR claims we have next year.
• We can know; we'll know what the dollar volume of those claims was and what it was previously.

Bills: HB12, HB145, HB222, HB291, HB430, HB821, HB874, HB909, HB951, HB979, HB1193

Keywords: survivor benefits, law enforcement, reserve officer, auxiliary officer, public safety, firefighters, medical expenses, dental expenses, disability benefits, Medicaid, dental coverage, healthcare access, medical necessity, Louisiana Department of Health, health insurance, provider agreements, contracting actions, participating facilities, network status, survivors benefits

Transcript Highlights:

• And then your trustee and benefit payments, those are claims or pass-throughs, where money is just passed
• It corrects internal numbering inconsistencies and aligns the statute's claims... Senator Kaiser.
• Corrects internal numbering inconsistencies and aligns the statute's claim. Idaho residents.
• This bill makes it explicit and enforceable at the point of claims submission.
• It brings the claim submission section provisions into alignment with the eligibility provisions already

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Workers with open claims are required to have ongoing treatment from a provider in the network.
• for our employees, but we also care about quality of care and throughout the process of the whole claim
• condition is on. ...allowed, they're only allowed for claims when the medical condition is only mental
• We have seen a doubling in the cost of claims between just 2018 and 2024.
• The changes in this bill stand to impact every Washington worker with a workers' compensation claim,

Summary: The Senate Labor and Commerce Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 6152 would add physical and occupational therapists as attending providers in workers’ compensation claims. Supporters said it would reduce delays, improve access to care, and speed return to work; opponents, including the Washington State Medical Association, retail and business groups, and L&I, raised concerns about diagnosis, scope of practice, network enrollment, implementation time, and the $1.9 million fiscal note from accident and medical aid accounts. The committee also heard SB 5437, which would prohibit non-compete agreements and clarify non-solicitation rules. The sponsor and labor and physician groups supported ending non-competes as anti-competitive and harmful to worker mobility, while business, banking, and clinic representatives argued non-competes protect investments, confidential information, and patient/customer relationships and asked for narrower changes. The committee then heard SB 6058, which would give L&I discretion over whether to investigate wage complaints and would toll civil statutes of limitation when a complaint is filed. The sponsor said it would better match agency resources, and testimony was entirely supportive. SB 5944 would require language access provider compensation bargaining to include missed or canceled appointments and make CBAs prevail over conflicting agency policies; the sponsor and union representatives said it would create consistency across agencies, with no opposition testimony. SB 6039 would modernize L&I communications by allowing electronic notices while preserving a non-electronic option; supporters called it a permissive modernization, while worker advocates warned email could be missed and could burden vulnerable workers, though L&I said the bill preserves choice and has no fiscal impact. Finally, the committee heard SB 6117, which would place workers and employers not covered by the NLRA under PERC jurisdiction if federal law no longer applies, with card-check and secret-ballot procedures and interest arbitration provisions. Supporters said it would create a state backstop if federal labor enforcement fails and protect workers’ organizing rights; opponents from agriculture, business, and small business groups warned it was too broad, could sweep in agriculture and small businesses, and could weaken secret-ballot protections and disrupt harvest operations. The sponsor closed by saying the bill is intended to create a clear framework where federal jurisdiction is absent. No votes or executive actions were taken in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:37:18.960><c> cost</c> um start with uh claim cost um start with uh claim cost uh<00:37:20.880
• :37:22.720><c> the</c> uh claim cost calculation for the uh claim cost calculation for the impact.<00
• </c> several different tables here for claim several different tables here for claim costs<00:41:32.079
• I see. claim cost impact uh both on a PMP and claim cost impact uh both on a PMP and percentage<00:43
• ,</c><01:32:09.679><c> and</c> education costs, disability claims, and education costs, disability claims

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Call to Order and Roll Call 00:00:23 Kentucky Bankers Association 00:02:32 How to Read and Understand KRS 6.948 Health Mandate and Federal Cost Defrayal Impact Statements 00:25:40 Proposed Amendments to Kentucky's Essential Health Benefit-Benchmark Plan 00:50:18 Proposed Health Insurance Legislation for the 2026 Session 01:04:22 Reimbursement for Covered Benefits Delivered Through the Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model 01:01:46 Coverage of Eating or Feeding Disorders 01:18:47 Coverage of Hearing Loss 01:25:31, 958, all

Summary: The Interim Joint Committee on Banking and Insurance met for its first interim meeting, established a quorum, approved routine opening items, and welcomed a new committee assistant and a legislative intern. The committee first heard a Kentucky Bankers Association presentation from Tim Shank and John Cooper focused on the state’s housing shortage, which they described as affecting all 120 counties and especially low- and moderate-income and workforce housing. They urged support for a proposed $20 million banker-backed revolving fund, paired with tax credits, to finance new housing construction; they said the program would be flexible, could support alternatives such as manufactured housing, and would use below-market loans with tax credits vesting over five years only after units are completed. They also asked for extension of the historical tax credit carryforward from five to seven years and for continued support of new market tax credits, arguing that supply-chain delays make the longer period necessary for historic rehabilitation projects. The bankers also raised concerns about credit unions, arguing that because credit unions do not pay the same taxes as banks, they should not be allowed to acquire healthy state-chartered banks or hold state and local deposits. They cited the recent purchase of First State Bank of Middlesborough as an example, saying the transaction would reduce state, county, and city tax revenue and weaken local tax bases. In response to committee questions, the presenters said local regulations, zoning, parking, sidewalk, and utility easement issues can significantly delay housing projects, and they emphasized that state policy and infrastructure support are needed to help address affordability and development barriers. The committee then shifted to a Department of Insurance presentation by Commissioner Sharon Clark on how to read KRS 6.948 health mandate and federal cost defrayal impact statements. Clark explained that the mandate statements were created in 1998 so legislators would have actuarial estimates of how proposed health insurance mandates would affect administrative costs, premiums, and total costs, and she noted that later legislation added federal cost-defrayal analysis. She also reviewed the background of the Affordable Care Act’s essential health benefits framework and said the department’s statements are intended to help lawmakers make informed decisions on proposed health coverage mandates. No votes or formal actions were taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hi, Mateo Kushner from Community Water Center on behalf of Clean Water Action, Physicians for Social
• I think we all agree that clean, affordable drinking water should be accessible for all Californians.
• That clean, affordable drinking water should be accessible for all Californians.
• This Thank you. $750 million to clean up the whole facility.
• And they relate to clean water as well.

Summary: The Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee heard three main bills after initially lacking a quorum and deferring the consent calendar. SB 501 by Senator Allen would expand California’s battery extended producer responsibility program to include medium-format batteries, such as those used in e-bikes, lawn equipment, and portable power systems. Supporters from local governments, recycling groups, environmental organizations, and battery stewardship interests said the bill would reduce fire risks, improve collection and recycling, and close a gap in existing law. One industry witness sought clarification about off-highway vehicles and a battery association requested guardrails for mixed battery formats; the California Retailers Association moved from opposition to neutral after discussions with the author. SB 1125 by Senator Menjivar would create a statewide, state-funded low-income drinking water rate assistance program administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, contingent on funding. The author and supporters said many Californians face water debt and that the bill would help address affordability while working around Proposition 218 limits on local ratepayer-funded assistance. Water districts, local governments, environmental justice groups, and conservation organizations testified in support, and there was no opposition. SB 1259 by Senator Blakespear, as amended, would require refineries to provide advance information on closure, cleanup costs, and timelines to help communities plan for refinery transitions and remediation. Supporters, including the City of Benicia, environmental justice groups, and advocacy organizations, argued that communities need transparency before closures occur and that other energy sectors already provide similar planning information. Opponents from labor, petroleum, and business groups argued the bill was unnecessary, burdensome, and could discourage refinery investment or signal premature decline of the industry. After extensive debate, the committee voted to pass SB 1259 as amended to the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee, and also approved SB 501 and SB 1125; the consent calendar items SB 1253 and SJR 13 were adopted.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's just defunct, so we're just going to clean this off the books.
• So we're just going to clean this off the books.
• It's just a defunct, and so we're just going to clean this off the books.
• So we're just going to clean this off the books.
• So instead of the problem we have with EPA and the clean water, can hook up.

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from March 25 and reordered the agenda to hear House Bill 941 first. HB 941, presented by Speaker Moyle, would move the rules coordinator and related rule publication functions from the executive branch to the Legislative Services Office and eliminate the existing periodic review process for administrative rules. Supporters said the bill would restore legislative control over rules and ensure they match statutory authority; opponents raised separation-of-powers concerns and worried about giving one legislative employee too much power. After questions from several members, the committee voted on a due-pass motion, which failed 8-5. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 1320, a code cleanup measure removing outdated language tied to a State Controller’s Office project fund that ended in 2023. With no testimony in opposition, the committee passed SB 1320 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation. It next heard Senate Bill 1236, which repeals the Idaho Women’s Commission because it has been defunded and inactive for years. The sponsor described it as housekeeping, while several women’s advocacy groups and individual testifiers opposed the repeal, arguing the commission still has value in addressing women’s representation, pay, health care, and other issues. After debate, a motion to hold the bill failed 7-6, and the committee then approved SB 1236 for the floor on a 7-6 vote. Finally, the committee considered Senate Bill 1397, presented by Representative Sauter and Senator Woodward, which would bring certain private wastewater systems under Public Utilities Commission oversight if they have 100 or more connections. Supporters said some homeowners are trapped by private sewer monopolies, facing doubled rates and being unable to obtain building permits because systems lack capacity or will-serve letters. Opponents questioned whether the bill would interfere with private contracts, but supporters argued it would provide the same consumer protections already applied to other utility monopolies. The committee passed SB 1397 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We're starting with the Keep It Clean bill.
• My name is Andrew Myers. starting with the keep it clean bill starting with the keep it clean bill representative
• </c> and a member of the keep a clean and a member of the keep a clean Coalition<00:02:44.400><c> and
• I mean, you know, if you want to protect clean water, this is the bill for you.
• bill, after it leaves here, stay clean?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We're moving to agree to the SD1, which has a clean date. So, there is no CD8. Okay.
• </c><00:03:16.239><c> So,</c> the SD1, which has a clean date. So, the SD1, which has a clean date.
• Um, and then with the clean effective date, we just, for your information, Senator, we did reach out
• Um and then with the clean deadline.
• Um and then with the clean effective<00:08:34.080><c> date,</c><00:08:34.479><c> we</c><00:08:34.640>

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm Trent Lang, President of the California Clean Money Campaign.
• I'm Trent Lang, President of the California Clean Money Campaign.
• Trent Lang, again, president of the California Clean Money campaign.
• Susan Satterholm, San Francisco, California Clean Money Campaign, strong support.
• Carol Badger from San Francisco and California Clean Money, strong support.

Summary: The Assembly Elections Committee met on July 2, 2025, with a quorum present and took up eight agenda items, including four consent bills. The committee first approved the consent calendar, which included SB 280, SB 621, SB 851, and SB 852, all moving forward without objection. The committee then heard several bills from Senator Umberg focused on election administration and campaign finance, along with SB 408 on voter-roll maintenance. SB 249 would require county board of education elections to be consolidated with the statewide general election. Supporters, including the League of Women Voters, argued this would increase turnout and make those elections more representative; opponents, including Orange County education officials, argued it would override local control, increase costs, and add ballot fatigue. The bill passed 5-2 and was re-referred to the Committee on Education. SB 398 would make it a crime to pay or offer contingent payments or other valuable consideration to induce voting or voter registration, closing what supporters described as a loophole involving lotteries and incentives. It passed 5-0 as amended and was re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety. SB 42 would remove the state ban on public financing for campaigns in general law cities and counties, allowing local voters to decide whether to adopt such systems. Supporters from Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, and many local advocates said it would broaden participation and reduce the influence of big money; opponents raised concerns about taxpayer funding, guardrails, and local oversight. The bill passed 5-2 and was re-referred to Appropriations. Finally, SB 408 would require election officials to use U.S. Postal Service change-of-address data to help maintain voter rolls; supporters said it would improve accuracy and trust in elections, while one commenter questioned reliance on postal data. The bill passed unanimously 6-0 and was re-referred to Appropriations. The committee then completed the remaining roll calls and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• What I want to say is, according to the National Physician Database, that includes all malpractice claims
• What I want to say is, according to the National Physician Database, that includes all malpractice claims
• Medical loss ratio is defined as a health carrier's incurred claims plus the carrier's expenditures for
• Insurers will no doubt claim premiums will rise, the market will somehow be destabilized, and some may
• It does not measure whether patients can get timely appointments, whether claims are paid accurately,

Bills: HB2261, HB2283, HB2425, HB2110, HB2113, HB2122, HB2152

Keywords: healthcare, transparency, patient communication, credentials, professional standards, medical loss ratio, insurance, health plans, cost management, nursing delegation, registered nurse, RN, home care aide, nursing assistant, certified nursing assistant, CNA, medical assistant, home health, hospice, community-based care

Transcript Highlights:

• This excludes most young adults and seniors from claiming the credit.
• This excludes most young adults and seniors from claiming the credit.
• So the question on the next slide is sort of how to find how many people are eligible but not claiming
• We link together the encrypted versions and are able to then determine who's eligible but not claiming
• So we were able to sort of identify the populations who were eligible for credits and not claiming those

Summary: House Finance heard testimony on two affordable housing bills. House Bill 1859 would expand an existing density bonus for housing on religious organization property by lowering the affordability threshold from 100% to at least 50% affordable units, requiring local policies to implement the bonus upon request, and creating a new state and local sales and use tax exemption for qualifying projects with at least 50% affordable units maintained for 10 years. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would help projects on church-owned land pencil out amid high construction and financing costs, while a county association raised concern that the bill would create an unfunded mandate for local planning departments. Several witnesses also asked that homeownership projects be explicitly included, and staff confirmed the exemption would be administered through an exemption certificate. The committee then moved to House Bill 1717, which would authorize cities and counties to create a local sales and use tax remittance program for affordable housing developments. Staff said the remittance would cover 100% of local taxes paid after project completion, with a 50% affordable housing threshold and 40-year affordability requirement, and the sponsor and local government and housing advocates supported it as a flexible tool to reduce development costs. Testifiers generally backed both bills, with some asking for more flexibility on income targeting and clarification on county-city interactions under HB 1717. No votes were taken; both public hearings were closed and the committee adjourned after a separate work session on the Working Families Tax Credit, where advocates urged broader eligibility, higher benefit amounts, and easier access, and a California researcher described data-linking methods used to improve tax credit take-up.

Transcript Highlights:

• The act required DFA to provide a method for reporting and claiming this credit, and we simply took our
• existing beer excise tax reporting form and allowed you to deduct and claim it right on the form.
• How are we going to, if they do claim the tax credit, how do we then verify that they're actually...
• So they will claim the credit on their report. They will provide a copy of the grain bill.
• And so I just... ...of the grain bill and sourcing the claims.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In addition to their grief, many children are left with an unfair claims process standing in the way
• One of the most pressing issues is the equitable distribution of assets to satisfy outstanding claims
• I believe elevating this claim. would be a very good thing, especially for families in need.
• Additionally, By prioritizing child support claims, HB 3311 would alleviate the financial burden on the
• If you file a secured lien, my understanding is when child support is owed and probate, you file a claim

Bills: HB368, HB3311, HB1734, HB2495, HB2716, HB793, HB3376, HB2524, HB3421, HB3446, HB3181

Keywords: electronic devices, family violence, criminal prosecution, protective orders, tracking, harassment, family allowance, decedent's estate, surviving spouse, minor children, inheritance, child support, maintenance, HB 1734, Family Code, Section 155.207, suit affecting the parent-child relationship, SAPCR, continuing exclusive jurisdiction, jurisdiction transfer