Video & Transcript : 'disclosure statement' :
Page 285 of 500
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on State & Local Government (3-3-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- Two quick questions and then a quick statement.
- </c><00:27:38.080><c> um</c> Senator and then a quick statement um Senator and then a quick statement
- Okay, and just follow-up statement?”
- Okay, and just follow-up statement?”
- Okay, and just follow-up statement? Yes, Mr.
Keywords:
Meeting Start: 00:44
Attendance Roll Call: 00:55
SB 193 (Sen. Girdler): 01:53
SB 9 (Sen. Higdon): 03:22
SB 257 (Sen. Tichenor): 34:14
Adjournment: 50:57, 958, all
Summary:
The Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government first took up Senate Bill 193, a simple measure described as restoring wallet cards for jailers to carry when they are outside the jail. The sponsor noted the fiscal impact was essentially zero, there were no questions, and the committee approved the bill 9-0 for passage to the Senate floor.
The committee then heard Senate Bill 9, sponsored by Senator Higdon, which would change how the Teachers Retirement System (TRS) treats sick leave, personal leave, and annual leave in retirement calculations. The sponsor argued the bill is intended to address TRS’s financial challenges by standardizing leave rules statewide, limiting TRS retirement credit to 10 sick days and 2 personal days per year, preventing annual leave from being rolled into sick leave, requiring districts to pay the actuarial cost for any leave beyond the cap, and adding reporting and oversight requirements for participating agencies. He also said the bill would add 30 days of maternity leave, allow voluntary district contributions for tier four teachers, and direct the state auditor to audit TRS and report on agencies.
Committee members asked about how overages would be audited and billed, the cost of a sick day, and how the bill would interact with local leave policies, including paid parental leave in some districts. The sponsor clarified that existing accumulated leave would not be affected, that the bill applies going forward, and that districts could still offer more leave but would bear the added cost. Members also discussed whether the maternity leave language set a cap or a minimum, and one senator noted the bill was intended to preserve personal days while stopping annual leave from being converted into pension credit. No vote on Senate Bill 9 was shown in the transcript excerpt.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- The police often do not know whether their questioning will lead to an inculpatory statement or even
- The police often do not know whether their questioning will lead to an inculpatory statement or even
- </c><01:58:56.000><c> made</c><01:58:56.199><c> in</c> paragraph um or a statement made in paragraph
- </c> overcome and statements that were not overcome and statements that were not electronically<02:00
- </c><02:17:09.399><c> in</c> then you can still use the statement in then you can still use the statement
Committee:
Senate Judiciary
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
The July 2025 Flooding Events, General Investigating Apr 28th, 2026
The July 2025 Flooding Events, General Investigating
Transcript Highlights:
- You apologize in your opening statements.
- Would that be a correct statement? Yes, sir.
- You know, if you can't, those statements, by the way, in the news, You know, if you can't, those statements
- Quick statement: I just want to echo Speaker Moody's statements, and we're here to help you on your missions
- Fair statement?
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Banking and Finance Committee Apr 21st, 2025
Banking and Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- Jackson, your closing statement please. I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
- I have not seen a financial statement that attests to that.
- I can show you all my credit card statements and the bank statements.
- Ortega, please, your closing statement.
- Garcia, please give your closing statement. Well, thank you, everyone.
Committee:
House Banking and Finance
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Judiciary committee approves restorative justice confidentiality bill, HF104 3/18/25
Transcript Highlights:
- Statements made in the context of a restorative practice setting would be inadmissible in court, similar
- It just protects the statements that are made during the restorative practice for the purposes of the
- It just protects the statements that are made during the restorative practice for the purposes of the
- It just protects the statements that are made during the restorative practice for the purposes of the
- This bill does is protect those statements so that it can be more effective.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine research security risks posed by foreign nationals from countries of risk working at the Department of Energy¿s National Laboratories and necessary mitigation steps. Feb 20th, 2025 at 09:00 am
Energy and Natural Resources Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- laboratories and necessary mitigation steps. give them an opportunity to give their five-minute opening statements
- Now, we'll turn to Senator Heinrich for his opening statement.
- Let me introduce each of them quickly, and then we'll turn to each of you for your opening statements
- DeBar. for your opening statement, then to Ms. Puglisi, in order of introduction, and then to Ms.
- There's been a lot of testimony or a lot of statements. statements from members and the witnesses about
Keywords:
national security, Department of Energy, foreign espionage, security protocols, Chinese Communist Party, national laboratories, research security
Summary:
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened to address pressing issues related to research security risks at the Department of Energy, focusing specifically on foreign nationals' access to sensitive information. The meeting highlighted the increasing threats posed by espionage from the Chinese Communist Party, which has sought to infiltrate U.S. national laboratories and exploit American research for military purposes. Discussions included the importance of tightening security protocols to safeguard national interests and maintain technological advantages. Witnesses provided insight into historical contexts and current vulnerabilities, emphasizing that without proper measures, the gaps could jeopardize national security.
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security Jan 14th, 2025
Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security
Transcript Highlights:
- But I do want to make a statement, and it's going to be a statement. Not a question. Go ahead.
- But I do want to make a statement, and it's going to be a statement.
- But I do want to make a statement, and it's going to be a statement. Not a question, go ahead.
- But I do want to make a statement, and it's going to be a follow-on with what Senator Burgess said.
Summary:
The committee held its first meeting of the session, with members introducing themselves and expressing support for veterans, military families, first responders, space industry growth, and domestic security. The first presentation was from the Florida Division of Emergency Management on the 2024 hurricane season and recovery efforts. Officials described response and recovery operations for Hurricanes Debbie, Helene, and Milton, including sheltering, meals, water, tarps, power restoration, flood control, debris removal, and public assistance funding. They emphasized that recovery is ongoing, that mitigation and resiliency investments are critical, and that Florida’s shelter space remains in deficit in many counties, especially for special needs populations. Senators asked about improving logistics capacity, technology for grant processing, HOA/private property debris issues, drainage and culvert maintenance, and ways to expand shelter capacity; the witness said more technology, better local coordination, and county-by-county planning would help, while noting limits on state authority over private property and county emergency manager qualifications.
Committee members praised FDEM’s response and asked how the Legislature could help, including whether more logistical hubs, pumps, and flood-control equipment were needed. The witness said technology investments could reduce fatigue and improve grant and recovery processing, but that manpower would still be necessary. The committee also discussed the statewide emergency shelter plan, the use of schools as shelters, and the need to identify vacant commercial space and other facilities for future sheltering and special-needs needs. The witness said FDEM works with counties and commerce partners to identify available space and uses legislative funding for shelter retrofits and new construction when needed.
The second presentation was from Blue Origin on its Florida operations. The company outlined its work in New Glenn, New Shepard, Blue Ring, lunar landers, and engine production, highlighting its Space Coast presence, more than 3,600 Florida employees, and over $3 billion invested in facilities. Blue Origin also described partnerships with Space Florida, public school Space Academies, internships, SkillBridge, and STEM outreach through Club for the Future. Members asked about the upcoming New Glenn launch window, which the company said was targeted for later that week, and the committee expressed interest in Blue Origin’s role in Florida’s space economy. The meeting ended with no further business and a motion to adjourn, which was adopted.
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- What's the current statement? Mr.
- What's the current statement? Mr.
- Their statements are all put together.
- Once again, second forensic interview, no statement of abuse whatsoever.
- It says, thank you for allowing this statement to be read into the record.
Summary:
The Committee on Government met for a presentation-only hearing focused on the Arizona Department of Child Safety (DCS) and related child welfare system issues; no bills were heard or voted on. Chair Blackman opened by stressing that the hearing was for fact-finding and data, not personal attacks, and Director Catherine Patak then presented DCS data on hotline volume, investigations, reunifications, adoptions, guardianships, extended foster care, and placement patterns. She said DCS investigated more than 43,000 cases in 2025, kept the out-of-home population relatively steady, and emphasized that Arizona places a high share of children with kin. She also highlighted a mismatch between the age of children entering care and the availability of foster homes willing to take older youth, and said behavioral health capacity, not DCS alone, is a major constraint. Patak discussed kinship supports, foster care reimbursement increases, the Family First Prevention Services Act, missing youth, congregate care reduction, and the department’s procurement process for group home beds. Members asked about kinship caregiver support, behavioral health access, reunification services, parental-rights terminations, Auditor General findings on notices and documentation, licensing and reimbursement rates, and why some relatives are not approved as placements. Patak said DCS is working on policy guidance, supervisor training, and improved supports, but that provider capacity and other system partners limit what DCS can do.
Representative Gillette then gave a lengthy presentation focused on system design, procurement, funding flows, and congregate care. He argued that DCS, DES, and Access are structurally intertwined, that DCS’s procurement carve-out and capitated funding model create incentives tied to bed space and volume, and that fragmented oversight diffuses accountability. He cited budget figures, contract amendments, and audit concerns to argue that the system is overreliant on congregate care and that decision-making, medical referrals, and placement processes are too vague or too centralized in ways that can harm children and families. Gillette said his findings were based on contracts, interviews, and public records, and he indicated some material would be referred to special counsel. He also raised concerns about placement decisions, due process, and demographic disparities in congregate care outcomes. The chair cut off further questioning of Gillette for time and announced the committee would move on to the next presenter, Vice Chair Fink, with attorneys and other speakers to follow.
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- What's the current statement? Mr.
- Their statements are all put together.
- Once again, second forensic interview, no statement of abuse whatsoever.
- Once again, second forensic interview, no statement of abuse whatsoever.
- My purpose in submitting this statement is not to attack those individuals.
Committee:
House Government
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
House - Chamber Meeting Oct 2nd, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- He had a simple statement: "Prove me wrong." And Mr.
- Would that be a fair statement, Mr. Speaker, gentlelady? Mr.
- It's a policy statement, and it's dated July 28th, 2025.
- It's a policy statement, so I'm not obviously going to read it.
- A policy statement does not have the rule of law.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Elections Committee Aug 19th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- But Madam Chair, we made the statement that we're making this very transparent.
- There's a statement that you made is that Texas did not follow that. Correct. Okay. It's bad.
- The statement that you made is that Texas did not follow that. Correct. Okay. It's bad.
- Because of the KCRA report, the maps were done by the D-Triple-C—is that an accurate statement?
- I was just because you're an entire statement. I'm leaving it. A different bill.
Summary:
The Assembly Elections Committee met on August 19, 2025, to consider ACA 8, SB 280, and an informational hearing on AB 604. The meeting began with several failed motions to adjourn, to read public comments into the record, and to recess so members could review the roughly 16,000 public comments submitted through the committee portal. The chair emphasized the hearing’s expedited format, transparency measures, and rules limiting witness testimony, and noted a letter from Speaker Rivas authorizing Assemblymember Berman to present ACA 8.
ACA 8, described by supporters as the “Election Rigging Response Act,” would place before voters a temporary congressional redistricting plan tied to AB 604 and triggered only if another state, especially Texas, adopts a partisan mid-decade redistricting. Supporters, including Assemblymember Berman, labor groups, CTA, Planned Parenthood affiliates, SEIU, and other allied organizations, argued the measure was a response to partisan gerrymandering elsewhere and a defense of democracy, with voters having the final say in a November 4, 2025 special election. Opponents, including current and former redistricting commissioners, good-government groups, business and taxpayer organizations, and many members of the public, argued the proposal undermines California’s independent redistricting model, was rushed without adequate public review, could cost roughly $200 million or more, and would invite litigation and partisan manipulation.
The committee also debated a proposed amendment that would bar legislators who voted for ACA 8 from later running for Congress in districts adopted under the measure. After extended procedural disputes, the committee voted to lay the amendment on the table. The hearing then continued with extensive public testimony, overwhelmingly divided between strong support and strong opposition, but the transcript provided does not show a final committee vote on ACA 8 or SB 280 before the excerpt ends.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Legislative Audit Committee Jun 29th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Before I turn it over to Assembly Member Alvarez for an opening statement, I just want to leave us with
- But first, if you have an opening statement, please feel free to do that.
- But first, if you have an opening statement, please feel free to do that.
- You are making a statement that helps me with an argument that I've made.
- I'm just trying to understand your statement. No, we have the data. We're presenting the data.
Summary:
The committee held an oversight hearing on a state audit examining California’s community college transfer process and whether streamlining it could improve access to bachelor’s degrees. Opening remarks from legislators emphasized that California’s transfer system is central to equity and workforce development, but that only about one in five transfer-intending community college students complete a transfer within four years. Members highlighted disparities by race, region, campus, and major, and pointed to confusion created by differing requirements across the UC, CSU, and community college systems, including limits and inconsistencies in the Associate Degree for Transfer (ADT), TAG, and major-specific prerequisites.
State Auditor’s staff said the audit found that while UC and CSU systemwide enroll more transfer students than the Master Plan target, individual campuses and high-demand STEM programs often do not. The audit identified barriers including unclear and varying course requirements, limited counseling and education plans, insufficient counselor staffing at some campuses, and weak equity plans. It also found that many students never even apply because they do not accumulate enough units or cannot navigate the process. The auditor described examples where transfer students with strong preparation were denied at selective campuses and noted that articulation alignment across systems remains limited.
Representatives from UC, CSU, and the Community Colleges responded that transfer remains a top priority and described ongoing reforms. UC cited a new public dashboard, data-sharing agreements, new transfer pathways, and an ADT pilot at UCLA, while saying campus-level capacity and program differences limit how much can be standardized from the system office. CSU said it admits more than 90% of eligible transfer applicants, is expanding transfer planning tools and direct outreach, and is implementing SB 640’s Transfer Success Pathway Program. Community Colleges said transfer reform must focus on clearer credit mobility, more consistent articulation, and broader ADT adoption. Members pressed the systems on inconsistent major requirements, the need for better coordination, and whether campuses are fully prioritizing transfer students; no votes were taken during the hearing.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Legislative Audit Committee Jun 29th, 2026
Joint Legislative Audit
Transcript Highlights:
- I think you'll have more members come in and make opening statements, but I just wanted to highlight
- But first, if you have an opening statement, please feel free to do that.
- But first, if you have an opening statement, please feel free to do that.
- You are making a statement that helps me with an argument that I’ve made.
- I'm just trying to understand your statement. No, we have the data. We're presenting the data.
Committee:
Senate Joint Legislative Audit
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- The FDA has made the statement, and under the Sherman Law, we're complying with that.
- I think there are some statements on FDA's website that entities who think mistakenly that FDA has banned
- A year later, DOJ lawyers stated in federal court that the statements that the California Department
- A year later, DOJ lawyers stated in federal court that the statements that the California Department
- So in that statement, I would just like to support that we do not create new felonies.
Committee:
Senate Health
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine the nomination of Elbridge Colby, of the District of Columbia, to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Mar 4th, 2025 at 08:30 am
Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel
Transcript Highlights:
- Colby, as I mentioned in my opening statement, I have appreciated what I view as your clear articulation
- Do you still agree with that statement?
- I agree with those statements. Nuclear deterrence must be the foundation for any defense strategy.
- And this is another area where, as I mentioned in my opening statement, where, you know, new facts arise
- And that's why I mentioned it in my opening statement, because I think, God forbid. that is actually
Keywords:
defense, geopolitical tensions, military readiness, China, Russia, U.S. military, Indo-Pacific, alliance, procurement
Summary:
The meeting focused on critical defense and security matters, particularly concerning the ongoing geopolitical tensions involving China and Russia. There were discussions surrounding U.S. military readiness, with significant emphasis on the potential threats posed by China in the Indo-Pacific region. Members expressed concerns about America's military capabilities in relation to the growing Chinese fleet and the importance of maintaining strong alliances with nations like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Additionally, the notion of prioritizing the defense industrial base was highlighted, emphasizing the need for effective procurement and modernization efforts to counter adversarial threats. Furthermore, notable commentary included a reference to President Zelensky's remarks regarding peace negotiations with Ukraine, expressing a willingness for further cooperation with the U.S.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
House - Health and Human Services Feb 5th, 2025
House Health & Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- We do not have time for statements and pontifications.
- I will finish my statements. I believe, Madam Chair, Representative, that I have the floor.
- to make them. they have opening statements to make them.
- My expert also has a statement.
- Data, and I will allow my expert witnesses to make statements and introduce themselves.
Committee:
House House Health & Human Services
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Session Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am
Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Many members of this body for the last couple years now believe that earlier requests and statements
- Previously, we had questions on their statements and additional communications, and it was like, where
- basis for the opinion, the basis of accounting, the responsibilities of management of the financial statement
- , the basis of accounting, the responsibilities of management of the financial statement, the auditors
- On page four, we find the essence of the audit: the statement of available resources and expenditures
Summary:
The Senate first took up several local bills and resolutions. It amended and passed to be engrossed Senate No. 1831, providing line-of-duty death benefits for the surviving spouse of Detective John DeSongy of Rutland, and passed to be engrossed House bills concerning police officer age requirements in Haverhill, Newton, and Stoneham, including exemptions for named individuals and a local age-waiver measure. The chamber also adopted congratulatory resolutions for the Florence Community Band’s 25th anniversary and for the Italian Consulate in Boston on Italian National Day.
The Senate then considered House No. 5501, the fiscal year 2027 state budget, after the House nonconcurred in the Senate’s amendment and appointed conferees. On motion, the Senate insisted on its amendment and appointed a committee of conference. The chamber also referred a House petition on a temporary liquor-license/public-consumption pilot to the Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technology after suspending Joint Rule 12.
A major floor debate centered on Senate No. 3104, a resolution responding to the Supreme Judicial Court’s May 7, 2026 order regarding the State Auditor’s request for Senate financial records. Supporters said the resolution would provide records in the clarified scope while preserving constitutional objections to broader requests; opponents argued the Senate should comply more fully and seek the court’s guidance earlier. After a roll call, the resolution was adopted 33-6. The Senate then adopted a motion to adjourn in memory of William F. “Bill” Howard of Beverly and adjourned until the following Monday at 11:00 a.m.
AR
Transcript Highlights:
- So I think it is incumbent upon us as legislators to make a very strong statement with this to say, we
- Would you agree with that statement or disagree with that statement?
- Would you agree with that statement or disagree with that statement?
Committee:
All HOUSE MANAGEMENT
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Warrant needed for federal immigration officers 3/10/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- And I would like to read a statement from one of my community members about one of these incidents.
- And I would like to read a statement from one of my community members about one of these incidents.
- As the County Attorneys Association wrote earlier this term in a statement to the house on a related
- As the County Attorneys Association wrote earlier this term in a statement to the house on a related
- As the County Attorneys Association wrote earlier this term in a statement to the house on a related
OK
Transcript Highlights:
- might disagree with you, and many of us in this room, in fact, 30 organizations that have given statements
- super conservative state and from a very ultraconservative newspaper, the New York Times, has a statement
- I appreciate that question, and and your statements, and I agree completely.
- I would disagree with that statement.
- I would disagree with the general thesis of your statement.
Committee:
House Government Oversight
Keywords:
government reporting, information technology, child welfare, environmental policy, state agency compliance, gender transition, minors, health services, punitive damages, parental rights, health care providers, purchasing, compliance, state employees, longevity pay, contract management, marijuana tax, public service impact tax, county funding, voter approval