Transcript Highlights:

• So the districts are all filing their budgets quarterly with the Department of Finance.
• They do have to submit their budgets. It's pretty hard for them to comply.
• They do have to submit their budgets.
• The fiscal impact report says there's already $2 million in the budget for a fish hatchery.
• $72 million in the budget for a fish hatchery.

Bills: SB47 , SB195 , SB196 , SB197 , SB198 , SB78

Committee: Senate Senate Conservation

Keywords: food recovery, composting, waste management, solid waste surcharge, organic waste reduction, environment, grants, advisory group, soil conservation, water resources, training services, outreach programs, environmental protection, animal care, veterinary services, spay and neuter, Las Vegas, community funding, animal welfare, animal shelter

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 47, a composting/organic waste measure that had been brought back from the table. The sponsor and witnesses described amendments that reduced the solid waste surcharge, added flexibility for landfills to divert organic waste to regional compost facilities, and delayed the effective date to July 1, 2027. Supporters said the changes made the bill more affordable and workable, while opponents from the waste industry still objected to the surcharge and wanted the proposed study completed before any tax was imposed. After committee discussion, a motion to table resulted in a tie vote, so the bill remained on the table. The committee then heard Senate Bill 195, which appropriates $1 million for training elected officials and staff of soil and water conservation districts. The sponsor and the New Mexico Association of Conservation Districts said the money would support compliance training, procurement and audit requirements, board education, and outreach for the state’s 47 districts. Support came from district officials and environmental advocates, who cited increasing responsibilities tied to disasters and climate impacts. The bill passed unanimously. Next, the committee considered Senate Bill 196 and Senate Bill 197, companion appropriations for animal care and spay/neuter services in Las Vegas and Raton. Senators questioned whether the bills mixed operating funds with capital improvements, whether the projects duplicated statewide spay/neuter grants, and how much local funding was involved. The sponsor said the local communities had substantial skin in the game and that the appropriations were needed for facility expansion and repairs. Both bills passed on 6-2 votes. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 198, which would fund an endangered species hatchery and rearing station in Las Vegas. The sponsor argued the project would help restore aquatic species and use available state land and water, while supporters said it would strengthen conservation efforts. Opponents argued New Mexico already has a hatchery doing similar work, raised concerns about nuclear and water issues, and questioned the location and policy direction. After extensive testimony, the committee did not finish the bill and recessed SB 78, a separate measure to allow nuclear energy to count toward renewable portfolio standards, for continued discussion on Tuesday.

Transcript Highlights:

• I want to say thank you to Chairman Albritton for the general fund budgeting today and rearranging your
• Speaking of, we wouldn't have been able to have budget and do everything that we do.
• hearings starting Monday at Budget hearings starting Monday at 12:30.<00:48:58.800><c> So,</c><00:48
• today and rearranging your budgeting today and rearranging your whole<00:49:53.520><c> schedule</c><
• </c> wouldn't have been able to have budget wouldn't have been able to have budget and<00:50:06.400><

Keywords: 920, all

Summary: The Senate began with a resolution honoring Special Agent Senior Josh Taylor for his long service in state law enforcement, including work as a traffic homicide investigator, field training officer, SBI major crimes investigator, and later on the Lieutenant Governor’s protective detail. The resolution was adopted by voice vote. The chamber then received a series of gubernatorial confirmations and House messages, including multiple Alabama Army National Guard promotions, appointments to state boards, and several House bills referred to Senate committees. Committee reports followed, with favorable reports on a number of bills from Finance and Taxation Education, Judiciary, State Governmental Affairs, County and Municipal Government, Agriculture, Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development, Children and Youth Health, and Local Legislation. The Senate confirmed Leon M. Nash to the Board of Pardons and Paroles by a 33-0 vote, and also confirmed several State Textbook Committee appointees by unanimous votes. The chamber also adopted several resolutions, including memorials for John David Williams and William Grant Lynch Jr., a commendation for Sandra Thompson, and a resolution urging federal action on sextortion and child exploitation. During local legislation, the Senate passed or certified several county-specific measures, including bills involving Pickens, Colbert, Marshall, Blount, Fayette, Franklin, and Walker counties; one Marshall County bill was later indefinitely postponed after word that its House companion had passed. In the special order calendar, the Senate adopted Senate Resolution 30 and then passed Senate Bill 95 extending the sunset on the “call before you dig” law, Senate Bill 42 addressing municipal election tie situations, Senate Bill 9 adding vaping to the Alabama Clean Indoor Air Act, and Senate Bill 41 on elder abuse and exploitation after adopting two amendments. The session ended with adjournment until 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 2nd.

Transcript Highlights:

• Number one, we have budget hearings on Monday. Those have been legislation.
• Number one, we have budget hearings on Monday.
• But again, budget hearings are canceled for Monday.
• on with the budgets.
• </c> that we continue with budget hearings. that we continue with budget hearings.

Keywords: 920, all

Summary: The Alabama Senate convened with prayer, the pledge, and a roll call establishing a quorum. Early procedural motions were adopted without objection, including excusing absent senators, dispensing with the prior journal, and allowing bills and committee reports to be introduced throughout the day. The Senate then took up several confirmation reports from the Committee on Confirmations, unanimously confirming Ralph Foster, Andre Harrison, Katie Randall, Donna Jones, and Reetta McCannan to the State Textbook Committee for Social Studies. The chamber also received a favorable report on Senate Bill 174 from the Transportation and Energy Committee, and later adopted a special order calendar from the Rules Committee. On the floor, the Senate passed a series of measures, including SB 104, which requires training for members of certain boards, commissions, and councils under the sunset law but was amended to exclude county and municipal boards; HB 59, a cleanup bill concerning the Certified Public Accountants Board; SB 8, authorizing the Emergency Management Agency to spend public funds on public information; SB 66, changing University of Monavalo board terms and related requirements, with an amendment protecting certain trustees appointed before January 1, 2027; SB 168, codifying limits on a reading technique and emphasizing the science of reading; SB 149, creating a temporary teaching certificate pathway for qualified military veterans; SB 46, adding a special driver’s license designation for individuals with invisible disabilities; and SB 90, addressing seafood dealer licenses and support for domestic seafood producers. Local bills including SB 175 and HB 84, HB 200, HB 201, HB 184, HB 203, HB 204, HB 205, HB 133, HB 134, HB 193, and HB 112 also advanced or passed, with several county-specific measures receiving BR adoption, final passage, and in one case certification. Near the end of the meeting, leadership and members discussed severe weather and contingency plans for the coming week. Budget hearings scheduled for Monday were canceled and moved to Thursday, with the Senate planning to meet Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. if weather permits, or Wednesday if necessary. The Senate also received several House messages referring local bills to committee. The session adjourned after a motion to adjourn until Tuesday, January 27 at 3:00 p.m., with the journal left open to receive House messages.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Department of Energy Fossil Research budget was zero.
• The new budget, or the three budgets that got approved, shows that microgrids do align with the administration's
• So budget items that you've already submitted, for example... Example.
• One of them was budget impact. And so I think this gives us a little bit of time to plan for that.
• It gives us, so it will not impact this budget cycle the way I understand it.

Committee: House Water & Natural Resources Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• That has really decimated county budgets for excluding property taxes for veterans.
• The budget cuts here again eliminate our ability to do some of the training that this group does.
• The budget cuts are jeopardizing our ability to go out there to...
• So those are some examples of how the budget cuts are impacting each individual program.
• They had severe budget cuts.

Committee: House Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:

• really gives us a time to differentiate who we are, which we appreciate, and you know considering the budget
• But unfortunately, our school's budget does not reflect that.
• , a tough budget, and a time where we need to do two things.
• Like, in you know, any any budget discussion we're having just like the ones we're having now the one
• I would also say for especially the opposition to the budget we're going to have a discussion on both

Committee: House Education

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Also very troubling are the administration's abrupt cancellation of the budget. population of grants,
• I've seen and knew all have seen the leaked pass back budget. Now I hope it's not real.
• Or there's another path, and that path is this path. of the leaked pass back budget.
• That budget, I hope it's wrong, but it says a 44% cut to NIH funding.
• in FY15 to NIH budget of $49.8 billion today–$49 billion today–60% increase–60%.

Committee: Senate Senate Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:

• In reference to the Department of Budget and Finance's question about the type of bonds, it would be
• In reference to the Department of Budget and Finance's question about the type of bonds, it would be
• And then we have Budget and Finance with comments.
• 00:08:45.920><c> the</c><00:08:46.040><c> Department</c><00:08:46.360><c> of</c><00:08:46.480><c> budget
• of budget and finances request<00:21:20.080><c> to</c><00:21:20.400><c> specify</c><00:21:20.960><c>

Committee: Senate Housing

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Housing heard testimony on several housing-related measures. Senate Bill 65 would appropriate funds to the Hawaii Public Housing Authority for rehabilitation and repair of public housing units. Testifiers from the Department of Human Services, HPHA, Catholic Charities Hawaii, and Roar Cares supported the bill, emphasizing that repairing vacant units is a fast, cost-effective way to increase available housing for homeless and elderly residents. HPHA later told the committee it had 139 vacant units, with an estimated average repair cost of about $73,000 per unit. In decision-making, the committee recommended passage of SB 65 with amendments, including an appropriation of $10,147,000, and the motion passed. The committee also considered Senate Bill 40, which would allow HHFDC to secure a line of credit or other indebtedness for the bond volume cap recycling program. HHFDC supported the measure and explained that Act 35 had provided a $150 million line of credit for fiscal year 2025 only, so this bill would extend that authority; HHFDC said the bonds involved would be revenue bonds. Roar Cares supported the bill, while the chair asked whether the Legislature would need to pass such a bill annually. In decision-making, the committee recommended passage with amendments to specify revenue bonds and noted the administration should study other ways to secure the line of credit without annual legislation. For Senate Bill 35, which would create a Housing Efficiency and Innovation subaccount within the rental housing revolving fund and allow fund transfers without legislative approval, HHFDC and several others supported the measure, arguing that more flexible fund movement would improve efficiency. The committee adopted a recommendation to pass SB 35 with amendments, including language prioritizing projects on state or county land or projects by entities required to reinvest surplus into housing, and noting nonprofit developers could qualify for prioritization. Senate Bill 42, which would repeal certain 30% AMI set-aside and preference requirements for rental housing revolving fund projects, drew opposition from Catholic Charities Hawaii, which argued the bill would reduce the supply of the most vulnerable housing units, while HHFDC warned it could reduce production of 30% AMI units. The committee deferred SB 42. The final bill discussed was Senate Bill 75, which would establish a working group to revise the state’s qualified allocation plan and related rental housing revolving fund loan terms and report back to the Legislature. HHFDC and others offered comments, while Catholic Charities asked that the bill be deferred, saying HHFDC already had the capacity to work with the community without a new law. Roar Cares supported the concept but urged broader stakeholder inclusion. In decision-making, the chair said the committee report would note concerns about prior QAP revisions and the need for more transparent, ongoing stakeholder participation, and the committee recommended passage of SB 75 without amendments. All recommendations were adopted, and the hearing adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• don't find a new revenue source, you decrease the budget in another area.
• Our budget is now approximately $23 million a year.
• Our next presentation is state finance budget analyst.
• But it could be modified given the budget condition.
• But it could be modified given the budget condition.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Climate Crisis, Resources, Energy, and Transportation held an oversight hearing on home hardening and defensible space as wildfire mitigation strategies. The chair opened by stressing that California has reached a tipping point, with repeated community-scale wildfire losses, rising insurance costs, and growing utility wildfire mitigation expenses. The hearing was organized around four panels: what home hardening and defensible space are, community risk reduction and coordination, evaluation of current defensible space programs and proposed investments, and the future of home hardening and the California Wildfire Mitigation Program. The first panel featured IBHS, the Legislative Analyst’s Office, and local wildfire mitigation advocates. IBHS described wildfire spread through embers, flames, and radiant heat, emphasizing that structure separation, removing combustible materials within the first five feet of a home, and combining multiple mitigation measures significantly reduce loss. It highlighted its Wildfire Prepared Home and Wildfire Prepared Neighborhood standards, including an “essential” and “enhanced” level, and said California is ahead of other states but still needs scalable, standardized, and sustainably funded mitigation. The LAO outlined key policy questions for the Legislature, including the state’s role, intergovernmental coordination, cost-effectiveness, program design, measurement of success, long-term sustainability, and barriers to implementation. The chair and panelists discussed estimated costs, including roughly $15,000 for a basic retrofit and about $50,000 for more extensive ignition-resistant construction, and whether state funding should focus on the most cost-effective initial measures. The second panel focused on scaling adoption through local coordination, education, financing, and community-based programs. Megafire Action argued that home hardening is a market adoption problem and said the state should not try to pay for every home, but instead target high-leverage interventions across the “customer journey,” including education, financing, trusted certification, and neighborhood network effects. Ventura Regional Fire Safe Council described free home assessments, small retrofit grants, Firewise community support, and the importance of neighborhood-level action, local capacity, and cultural change. Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority described its locally funded model, grant program, public education efforts, and an Ember Ready program that helps residents navigate home hardening and Zone Zero compliance. The chair repeatedly emphasized the need for a coordinated statewide marketing campaign, stronger incentives, better insurance discounts, and more use of local, utility, federal, and private funding sources. The third and fourth panels addressed Cal Fire’s defensible space inspection program, the proposed defensible space financial assistance program, and broader state investments. Cal Fire said homes lacking compliant defensible space are far more likely to be damaged or destroyed and requested ongoing funding and staffing to stabilize inspections statewide; the LAO suggested the Legislature consider alternative funding sources such as GGRF or a reinstated SRA fee. Cal Fire and the State Fire Marshal explained that Zone Zero sets a minimum standard, local governments cannot go below it, and grant prioritization will favor jurisdictions that submit inspections. Cal Fire also said the new defensible space financial assistance program would focus on ember-resistant zone-zero work and, in the Southern California counties covered by the legislation, would assist about 3,125 homes at an estimated $8,000 per home. In the final panel, the State Fire Marshal described California’s layered strategy of parcel-level home hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation, along with technical support, financial assistance, and incentives such as insurance discounts and builder marketing. The overall theme was that California must move from isolated efforts to a coordinated, science-based, and scalable statewide approach to reduce wildfire losses.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are given a budget, and it's our job to figure out who deserves the haves and have-nots at that table
• Budgets being moral documents, and, um, Rep.
• </c><00:37:06.560><c> that's</c> services we just get a budget that's services we just get a budget that's
• ether in the DHS budget for housing stabilization<00:38:03.680><c> and</c><00:38:03.840><c> use</c><
• Um, from my understanding, actually, all the budgets come from taxes.

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: House File 4738 was laid over for possible inclusion in the 2026 tax bill. Representative Keeler presented the bill as a funding source for Minnesota’s Safe Harbor program, arguing that trafficking and sexual exploitation are statewide problems and that current shelter and housing resources are insufficient. She and several supporters emphasized that the program serves youth across greater Minnesota, not just the metro, and that state and federal funding pressures make additional support necessary. Testifiers from Place Called Home/Life House, The Link, the City of Minneapolis, and a survivor all described the impact of Safe Harbor and related shelter programs. They cited data on youth served, bed nights, mental health services, and high unmet need, including waitlists and youth turned away because programs are full. Testimony stressed that stable housing and trauma-informed services help survivors recover and move toward education, employment, and family stability. One committee member, Representative Davis, objected to the proposed funding source, saying he would not support taking money from women’s sports scholarships and urging a different source. The bill’s tax mechanism was described as ending the sales tax exemption for preferred seating, suite licenses, and related amenities at athletic and entertainment events. Alec Williams of We Make Minnesota supported the proposal as a fair way to raise revenue from high-end discretionary purchases for a public purpose. Committee discussion also focused on the size of the revenue estimate and the breakdown of the impact, with nonpartisan staff saying roughly 85% would come from suite licenses, 10% from collegiate seating, and 5% from amenities. Representative Smith and others framed the issue as both a tax and moral question, and the chair moved the bill to be laid over.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I do believe that when the House budget initially was put together, there was money in that budget
• Ideal would be what you asked for in the original budget.
• I, I certainly, the what, what did happen in the budget with wiping out almost 200 million in backlog
• The state also has the flexibility to either expand or contract, uh, based upon budget, uh, woes or budget
• But the state of Texas is on a two-year budget cycle.

Committee: House State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• House budget initially was put together.
• There was money in that budget for contracting. exclusive use, as well as buying aircraft. Now.
• Ideal would be what you asked for in the original budget.
• There was money in that in the original budget for exclusive use contracting. but also purchasing.
• The state also has the flexibility to either expand or contract based. based upon budget woes or budget

Committee: House State Affairs

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Bond is critical for providing the level of funding that just isn't possible through the budget.
• We could increase SB 2, recording fees, transfer tax, have a dedicated source from the budget.
• employ our dollars, The real question in a time of scarcity for us in the state budget is how do we
• For that program, you know, as it was in the past, some discussions we had in the budget subcommittee
• part, was HCD came to us this budget year and told us they're good on funding.

Summary: The Assembly Select Committee on Housing Finance and Affordability held its first hearing of 2025 to examine California’s housing finance system, with opening remarks emphasizing the state’s severe housing shortage, high costs, and the need for practical recommendations to the Legislature and Governor. Co-chairs described the committee as an educational and problem-solving forum focused on financing housing production, first-time homeownership, mixed-income developments, and affordability across the income spectrum. Witnesses from state agencies and the development sector were invited to explain how housing is financed and where the system is breaking down. Panelists from the California Housing Partnership, the Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee/State Treasurer’s Office, CalHFA, and Related outlined the “capital stack” used to finance affordable housing, stressing that projects typically rely on multiple public and private sources, including federal and state low-income housing tax credits, tax-exempt bonds, state subsidies, local funds, and rental income. Speakers noted that affordable housing rents generally cannot support full project costs without public subsidy, and that recent federal changes—especially the expansion of the 4% and 9% tax credit programs and the reduction of the bond financing threshold for 4% credits—should allow California to finance substantially more units. CalHFA also described its homeownership programs, including My Home, Dream For All, and disaster-related mortgage assistance, as well as its multifamily lending and bond issuance programs. Several witnesses and committee members emphasized that the system remains too complex, too slow, and underfunded. They pointed to the need for more state funding, a housing bond, a permanent funding source, and better coordination among agencies, while also citing recent streamlining efforts such as AB 434’s SuperNOFA, AB 519’s one-stop-shop working group, and the planned California Housing and Homeless Agency reorganization. Members raised concerns about equity, access, missing-middle housing, gender and racial disparities, and whether current programs adequately serve extremely low-income households and those at risk of homelessness. No formal votes or actions were taken during the hearing; the discussion ended with committee members and witnesses agreeing that both funding and administrative reform are needed to increase production and improve affordability.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:01:52.000><c> and</c> reach a fair and equitable budget and reach a fair and equitable budget
• They balance budgets. They set policy.
• </c> 2026 for the 11th day of the 2026 budget 2026 for the 11th day of the 2026 budget session.<00:20
• Introduction of House Budget Bill.
• </c> handle things, the budget process. handle things, the budget process. uh<00:43:22.400><c> the</c

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and uh Senator Weber's Friends's budget and uh Senator Weber's proposal<00:14:46.240><c> on</c><00:14
• Proud to present to you the budget bill intended to be the vehicle for the budget portion and the omnibus
• </c> Again, we're about to talk about budget Again, we're about to talk about budget targets<00:52:59.119
• Thomas microgrid research relates to an RDA appropriation from the 2023 budget year.
• The micro grid 2023 budget year.

Committee: Senate Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The recent state budget forecast released by MMB also highlights the impact of slowing employment growth
• a relative dis Advantage the recent at a relative dis Advantage the recent state<00:08:01.560><c> budget
• forecast</c><00:08:02.319><c> released</c><00:08:02.680><c> by</c><00:08:02.840><c> MMB</c> state budget
• forecast released by MMB state budget forecast released by MMB also<00:08:03.800><c> highlights</c><
• </c><00:26:35.760><c> constraints</c> they face potential budget constraints they face potential budget

Committee: House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• all applications, giving consideration to all of an agency's revenue sources and how much of its budget
• is for salary and benefits. to all of an agency's revenue sources and how much of its budget is for
• So it didn't affect last year's budget. No. All right. Thank you. Other questions? Other questions?
• And I believe this was initially requested in the governor's recommended budget, but when there were
• Also want to acknowledge our partners from the Office of Management and Budget.

Committee: Joint Finance

Keywords: 1064, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a study that was funded equally by the Lakes Commission under our budget and the University of
• And I know the question that you've all had with everybody is, what about the budget cuts?
• The budget cuts will have some issues with us with regard to the general fund itself.
• We have some line-item requests in the budget, and all of our budget line-item requests are dedicated
• None of them are general fund budget requests because of our dedicated funds, and all of these funds

Summary: The committee began by recognizing page Marley Johnson, who said she plans to finish school, attend flight school, and possibly pursue an aviation degree. Members asked about her experience in the Senate, and she said it changed her perspective by showing that state politics can be collaborative and focused on doing what is best for Idaho. The committee presented her with a letter of recommendation for flight school and an American 250 flag flown over the Capitol. The committee then considered several gubernatorial appointments and Idaho Department of Lands rules. It voted to send David Bobbitt’s reappointment to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and heard testimony from James Keating for reappointment to the Idaho Parks and Recreation Board; no vote was taken on his appointment at that time. The committee also heard a presentation from the Lake Pend Oreille Basin Commission on a study claiming the Corps of Engineers’ lake-level management costs the North Idaho economy about $40 million annually, with testimony focused on extending the full recreational season. Members asked about effects on recreation, fish habitat, and the geographic reach of the economic impact. Three pending rules from the Department of Lands were reviewed and approved. One rule on mine land reclamation was described as a zero-based regulation update that mainly reduced word count and reorganized application requirements, with no major substantive changes. A fee rule for navigable waterways and encroachments under the Lake Protection Act was also approved; it reduced word count, added definitions, and clarified encroachment-related provisions, with no fee increases. A third rule on easements on state-owned lands was approved as well; it deleted nominal application and assignment fees, adjusted compensation language, expanded emergency work definitions, and extended temporary permits from 10 to 20 years. Committee votes on all three rules were unanimous. Finally, Idaho Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton gave an agency update on parks operations, deferred maintenance, new campgrounds and docks, trail management, reservation pricing, and budget impacts. She said outdoor recreation remains a major economic driver, that the department has used appropriated funds to add capacity and improve facilities statewide, and that some service reductions may occur because of budget cuts. In response to a question, she said snowmobile registration revenue is down because of limited snow, which could affect county-run snowmobile programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• are rolling House Bill 202, and we're gonna hear briefly several bills that have components in the budget
• Just this is from the budget director: I believe we have $165,000 for this in the budget.
• Chair, I just have one clarification with respect to the $167,000 in the budget.
• We're glad this is in the budget.
• The implementation timeline will allow for the FY28 budget to sort of govern what is in this.

Bills: HB97 , HB280 , HB183 , HB151 , HB202

Committee: House House Appropriations & Finance

Keywords: Shaken Baby Syndrome, abusive head trauma, child safety, training and education, healthcare funding, youth internships, workforce development, education, grant funding, employment, drinking water, water quality, environment, public health, water filtration, private well testing, federal funding, childhood sexual abuse, time limitations, civil actions

Transcript Highlights:

• This hearing and the administration's budget proposal are the first step in this implementation.
• has indeed joined us before we begin with our panelists. of our Assembly Budget Committee has indeed
• And that is what we're going to need staffing and budget to be able to do. Right. All right.
• I know when we had an initial meeting to discuss the proposals that were in the Governor's budget, my
• I think that, taken together, those budget commitments really represent an important step to move this

Committee: House Utilities and Energy

Keywords: 988, house, all