Video & Transcript : 'budgetary levels' :

Page 26 of 500
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Unfortunately, as a legislature, we don't have good state-level data or information to inform good policy
  • coordination and to expedite services and support such as behavioral health resources at the local level
  • And also the role of the managing entities as we look at budgetary constraints that are definitely here
  • importance of bringing peer support specialists together so that they can network at a more macro level
  • And so imagine bringing that together on a statewide level so that you can learn from one another and
Summary: The Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs considered three bills and a confirmation. On SB 1600, as amended, the sponsor explained that the original child welfare language was replaced with a strike-all requiring the Office of Insurance Regulation to work with DCF and community-based care lead agencies to study liability insurance coverage and availability, report findings to the Legislature by January 1, 2027, and allow penalties for failure to provide requested information. The committee adopted the amendment and amendment to the amendment, heard supportive testimony from child welfare advocates, and reported the committee substitute favorably. The committee also heard CS/SB 556, which would allow students with disabilities to satisfy a physical education graduation requirement through participation in Special Olympics, and clarify that two years of marching band participation can satisfy PE and fine arts credit. Special Olympics Florida, parents, and other supporters testified in favor, and the bill was reported favorably. On SB 794, the sponsor described requirements for background screening of employees in residential facilities and day training programs for people with developmental disabilities, plus a review of waiver support coordination quality, workforce needs, geographic service gaps, and related recommendations due in 2027. The committee adopted a conforming amendment and reported the bill. The committee then took up the confirmation of Taylor Hatch as Secretary of the Department of Children and Families. Hatch outlined DCF’s recent work on child welfare, behavioral health, peer support, and technology improvements, and answered questions about child welfare system challenges, funding formulas, opioid settlement dollars, and interoperability of agency systems. After public comment, the committee voted to recommend her confirmation favorably, with Chair Graal voting no. The meeting ended with a request to record one senator’s vote on SB 1600 and adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband Apr 16th, 2025

S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband

Transcript Highlights:
  • Assembly members, what's going on is there's a lot of activity on the federal level on whether or not
  • The incentives at that level for a multifamily property owner to want... to upgrade access to Wi-Fi.
  • And then, with respect to the reimbursements, yes, that is going to give budgetary ...certainty to companies
  • It is getting up to that level where it is starting to raise a red flag with those who are responsible
  • They take a long time to get funded, and there's a lot of permitting that goes on at different levels
Bills: HB3713 , HB3953 , HB4055 , HB4272
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 2nd, 2026 at 03:25 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • and regional level.
  • We're loaning out, in some cases, 0% interest with some entry-level homes.
  • There continues to be a level of disparity.
  • So I will give you that, but income levels haven't risen on that level, right?
  • to incentivize via our ZIP program entry-level homes that are coming in at about the... 250 level, but
Bills: SB48 , SB64 , SB100
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • At the same time, including more foreign income in the tax base can not only affect revenue levels, but
  • Here— the federal and international level, as Professor Shansky noted.
  • You've got to make a lot of difficult decisions in these budgetary times.
  • You've got to make a lot of difficult decisions in these budgetary times.
  • I teach preschoolers with severe level three autism.
Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on California’s taxation of foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations, especially the state’s water’s-edge election versus worldwide combined reporting. Committee members and witnesses discussed how unitary taxation and sales-factor apportionment work, why multinational corporations are a small share of filers but a large share of tax liability, and how foreign income, profit shifting, and double taxation concerns affect policy choices. The Franchise Tax Board explained current filing rules, the seven-year water’s-edge election, and recent filing statistics showing about 21,562 water’s-edge returns in 2023, roughly 6% of C corporation filers but about half of corporate tax liability. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and FTB staff emphasized that revenue effects from eliminating water’s edge are uncertain because foreign affiliate income is not directly observable, and they noted possible revenue volatility and administrative complexity. Several committee members asked about foreign government pushback, the burden on FTB, whether certain industries are more likely to shift profits, and whether companies would leave California; witnesses generally said there was no strong evidence that firms would exit the state because tax liability is driven mainly by California sales. They also discussed how California already administers both methods, how the election can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on a firm’s facts, and how federal reforms like GILTI/NCTI, CAMT, and OECD Pillar Two may affect the issue. The second panel presented sharply contrasting views. One professor and a tax policy advocate argued that water’s edge creates unfairness, encourages profit shifting, and leaves California with billions in lost revenue, while a Tax Foundation witness argued that mandatory worldwide reporting would tax the wrong income, create double taxation and litigation risk, and impose heavy compliance burdens, especially for foreign-based multinationals. A later panel from the California Budget and Policy Center supported closing the “water’s-edge loophole,” saying it would raise needed revenue for public services and level the playing field between large multinationals and smaller domestic businesses. No vote or formal action was taken; the hearing was informational only.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • You've got to make a lot of difficult decisions in these budgetary times.
  • You've got to make a lot of difficult decisions in these budgetary times.
  • I teach preschoolers with severe level three autism.
  • Schoolers with severe level three autism.
  • Council supports our students. times of their lives, both academically and on a personal level.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • The level of interest was so great that today's hearing could easily have been expanded to an entire
  • The level of interest was so great that today's hearing could easily have been expanded to an entire
  • Generally speaking, all areas require some level of additional federal guidance to implement, but the
  • So this is giving a bit of a more budgetary focus.
  • It reverses onshore and offshore oil and gas royalty rates to pre-Inflation Reduction Act levels and
Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight held its fifth hearing of the year to examine the newly enacted federal H.R. 1 and its effects on California. Members and the chair described the law as a major threat to state health, food, education, and climate programs, and emphasized that California would not be able to fully backfill the federal cuts. Several members also highlighted the bill’s tax provisions, including temporary deductions for tips, overtime, seniors, and auto loan interest, while warning that the largest benefits flow to higher-income taxpayers and that major cuts to Medi-Cal, CalFresh, and clean-energy incentives are delayed or phased in over time. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and the Department of Finance presented detailed overviews of the bill’s likely impacts and implementation timelines. They identified the main affected areas as health care coverage and financing, food assistance, higher education, personal income taxes, and clean-energy/electric-vehicle credits. They explained that H.R. 1 limits provider taxes used to finance Medi-Cal, adds work and redetermination requirements, restricts CalFresh eligibility and increases state costs, changes student loan and Pell Grant rules, extends and modifies federal tax provisions, and phases out many clean-energy credits. Finance also noted major rescissions of Inflation Reduction Act funds, new border and immigration enforcement spending, and the possibility of PAYGO sequestration if Congress does not act to offset the deficit increase. During member questions, the committee focused on likely enrollment losses, administrative burdens, and fiscal exposure for the state and counties. Witnesses said many details still depend on federal guidance, but they estimated significant impacts on Medi-Cal, CalFresh, and graduate/professional student borrowing, and noted that California’s high CalFresh error rate could increase state costs. UC testified that the elimination of Graduate PLUS loans would affect thousands of professional students, especially in health, law, and other high-cost programs. Members asked for follow-up data on county, health, and tax impacts, and staff agreed to provide additional tables and estimates as implementation guidance becomes clearer. Public commenters from counties, early childhood advocates, health coalitions, disability rights groups, immigrant-rights organizations, and other stakeholders urged the Legislature to mitigate the law’s effects. They warned of higher county costs, reduced access to health care and food assistance, increased administrative burdens, and harm to children, immigrants, people with disabilities, and low-income families. Several urged new state revenue solutions and stronger protections for Medi-Cal, CalFresh, child care, and home- and community-based services. No votes were taken; the hearing was informational and ended with a commitment to continue monitoring federal guidance and to work on state responses in the budget process.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • WANT TO LET YOU KNOW AND OF COURSE THE DIRECTOR AND HIS TEAM, YOU ARE A KEY PART OF THAT TEAM, THE LEVEL
  • ONE OF THE EARLY LEVELS OF FRUSTRATION WAS THE STORM DEBRIS COLLECTION.
  • THE ACTUAL EXECUTION AND WHEN THAT WAS GOING TO OCCUR, HOW FREQUENTLY THAT WAS GOING TO OCCUR, THE LEVEL
  • THAT IS A CONTRACT AT THE LOCAL COUNTY LEVEL.
  • SO WHEN IT COMES TO LEVERAGING TECHNOLOGY, ENGAGING AT THE LOCAL LEVEL AND INVOLVING PREPAREDNESS PLANS
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • roadblocks at the state level.
  • Faculty are fighting to retain academic freedom, to have that level of free speech.
  • days, but also at the college level... ...you know, we have a student trustee.
  • I think that's the next level of the work.
  • That are reshaping how education works at every level.
Summary: The Assembly Higher Education Committee held an oversight hearing on how federal actions are affecting California higher education, with opening remarks from the chair and members emphasizing the importance of state-federal shared governance and the need to protect access, affordability, and campus diversity. The first panel included leaders from the CSU, University of the Pacific, California Community Colleges, and UC, who described broad impacts from federal grant terminations, changes to student aid, loan limits, visa and immigration policy, and proposed reductions to research support. Testimony focused on the elimination of Grad PLUS loans, caps on Parent PLUS and Pell-related changes, the loss or suspension of hundreds of grants, and the resulting harm to student support services, research, workforce pipelines, food assistance, and health care training. UC and CSU representatives warned of major losses in research funding, indirect cost reimbursement, and student opportunities, while community college leaders highlighted uncertainty around federal grants and the need to maintain services for low-income, first-generation, undocumented, and other vulnerable students. Committee members asked how the state could respond, including through intersegmental partnerships, dual enrollment, transfer pathways, and support for basic needs and nutrition programs. Witnesses said California could help by sustaining financial aid, protecting minority-serving institution programs, and investing in research, housing, and workforce development. Several speakers stressed that federal changes were creating instability for students and campuses, and that the effects would likely be long-lasting, especially in health care, teaching, STEM, and social work pipelines. A second panel then focused on equitable access. The California Student Aid Commission described state efforts such as the $3.9 billion investment in aid programs, the Cal Grant system, the Dream Act, and possible reforms to better serve adult learners, foster youth, undocumented students, and students with dependents. The Los Angeles Community College District reported that federal cuts and policy shifts are discouraging students from applying for aid, threatening TRIO and MSI/HSI-funded services, and reducing support for basic needs, counseling, and workforce programs. The Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities and the CSU Academic Senate echoed concerns about FAFSA confusion, international student restrictions, grant losses, and the erosion of equity-focused programs. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the hearing; the committee primarily received testimony and discussed possible state responses.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, that’s a high-level overview of those provisions.
  • Chair, that's a high-level offenses. Mr.
  • At a high level, they require some laws.
  • </c> the CRC level. the CRC level.
  • </c><01:36:35.800><c> impact</c> provisions that have no budgetary impact provisions that have no budgetary
Summary: The Public Safety Policy Conference Committee met on May 8, 2026, with all conferees present. The chair opened with decorum instructions, explained that the meeting was policy-only, and noted that no public testimony had been signed up. Members then introduced themselves, with several noting they were retiring at the end of the session or year. The committee adopted a series of provisions, mostly by unanimous voice vote, including House language on identity theft and financial crimes updates, supervision abatement and restitution considerations for corrections, protective-order enhancements for murder penalties, prediction markets, victim-notification requirements for plea and sentencing hearings, research data privacy, ignition interlock and impaired-driving license changes, DOC licensing and sanctions for juvenile/adult community-based residential facilities, criminal-conviction employment and licensing standards, jail medication procedures, domestic abuse law changes, and a grant-use extension for dual-status/crossover youth funding. Several items were described as technical or clarifying changes, while others updated law to address AI-related identity theft, foreign protective orders, victim privacy, and corrections oversight. The committee also heard discussion on a Senate provision allowing victims of domestic violence to petition for wireless account and phone-number transfers. A witness supported the concept but urged changes to better align the state language with existing federal law; members noted the issue might need another vehicle or further work. For the domestic abuse item, staff explained that an A15 amendment would later adjust the warrantless-arrest window from 28 days to 14 days. On the jail-medication item, a member emphasized the changes were clarifying and not an admission that last year’s law was flawed. All adopted provisions passed by voice vote without opposition.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Budget Committee Apr 10th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • I believe it's 300% of the federal poverty level who's eligible for that program.
  • We're happy to provide some high-level numbers if interested. Okay, thank you.
  • It's set as a percent of the federal poverty level.
  • Generally, it is about 138% of the federal poverty level.
  • I'm sorry, I don't have the federal poverty level in front of me.
Summary: The Assembly Budget Committee held an informational hearing on SB 100/AB 100, the early action budget bills, with a focus on Medi-Cal funding, wildfire recovery, and several smaller budget adjustments. The Department of Finance explained that the bill would add $2.8 billion General Fund and $8.3 billion federal funds for Medi-Cal, along with other items including wildfire-related local assistance for Los Angeles County, property tax backfills for fire-damaged local agencies, Cal OES wildfire monitoring authority, nonprofit security grants, the Property Tax Postponement Fund, FARMER and Clean Cars for All funding, foster family home insurance claims, Proposition 98 technical assistance for LA wildfire-impacted schools, teacher credentialing authority, and Proposition 4 climate bond appropriations for wildfire and forest resilience projects. Much of the member discussion centered on rising Medi-Cal costs, the recent $3.4 billion cash-flow loan, and whether the new appropriation would cover payments through June. Finance said the new funds were for program costs and cash flow, not repayment of the loan, and that no additional loan authority remained. Members also debated the causes of higher Medi-Cal spending, including expanded eligibility, higher enrollment, pharmacy costs, and federal policy changes. The LAO noted that forecasting errors are not unusual but that current revisions are somewhat higher than typical, though not unprecedented. Several members emphasized that Medi-Cal supports access to care and hospital stability, while others raised concerns about sustainability and future federal cuts. Public commenters largely supported the bill, especially the Medi-Cal funding and wildfire-related provisions. Health and labor advocates argued that the program is functioning as intended by covering more low-income Californians and preventing uncompensated care. Representatives of special districts and the Altadena Library District supported the property tax backfill provisions tied to the Eaton fire. The hearing ended without a vote, with the chair noting that the committee would adjourn for floor session and that the Assembly would vote on one of the early action bills later that morning.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/09/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 2663, level leaves of absence military training.
  • HB 2663, level leaves of absence military training. HB 2752, Commerce Authority trade offices.
  • Now, I will also say that there are potential budgetary impacts of this bill in allowing an agency to
  • So the premise of this bill is to silence the voice of tribal membership, tribal nations at this level
  • . ...of tribal membership, tribal nations at this level.
Summary: The Senate convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call, and a series of personal privilege introductions recognizing guests including the Doctor of the Day, realtors visiting for Realtor Day, and the family of former Senator Barbara Leff. The chamber also adopted House Concurrent Resolution 264 honoring Barbara Leff, followed by a moment of silence in her memory. The Senate then moved through a large number of bill introductions and first readings, as well as Committee of the Whole consideration of several measures. In Committee of the Whole, senators considered and advanced multiple bills, often with technical or negotiated floor amendments. Among those reported out as do pass or do pass as amended were SB 1494, SB 1497, SB 1503, SB 1535, SB 1544, SB 1580, SB 1582, SB 1584, SB 1585, SB 1602, SB 1632, SB 1723, and SB 1798. The amendments addressed topics such as technical corrections to mining and pension language, classical learning tests, sex trafficking record sealing, probation reporting, school safety funding, kinship foster care stipends, DES credentialing, domestic violence release conditions, and a school safety/threat identification pilot program that was revised into a FAFSA awareness recognition program. The Committee of the Whole report was adopted. The Senate then took up third-reading votes on several bills. HB 4115, SB 1012, SB 1213, SB 1416, SB 1474, SB 1511, SB 1549, SB 1573, SB 1634, SB 1647, SB 1649, SB 1664, and SB 1725 were considered, with most passing on party-line or near-party-line votes; SB 1416 and SB 1664 passed unanimously, while SB 1549 passed with broader support. Several members explained votes on immigration enforcement, concealed carry in establishments serving alcohol, commercial driver licensing, campaign finance, and a digital asset reserve fund. HB 2993, dealing with DPS legal representation funding, passed 16-13 after debate over constitutional concerns, funding sources, and the use of the Attorney General’s consumer fraud fund. The session ended with the Senate adopting the Committee of the Whole report and transmitting the passed bills to the House.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, February 23, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • than 15 minutes, with enemy missiles exploding mere feet from his aircraft and fuel below minimum levels
  • guidance on adopting AI and avoiding potential issues with the technology, and this bill will help level
  • Through this legislation, we will level the playing field.
  • THROUGH THIS LEGISLATION, WE WILL LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD.
  • BUDGETARY BURDENS AND OPERATIONAL SECURITY RISKS AFFECTING NATIONAL DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.
Bills: SB2503 , HB5235 , HB6329 , HB3679 , HB2600 , HR390
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Feb 5th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first more specific recommendation is adding the high-level policy principle that a state highway
  • Because I think sometimes the more that we get involved at the state level in these things, it may not
  • needs with our limited funds, and as a city council member, I need to understand the scope of new budgetary
  • helping us do better at recordkeeping as well as transparency and providing local governments some level
  • It would clarify that a federal, state, or local government authority must issue a level three or 'go
Summary: The committee began with a work session on the Washington State Transportation Commission’s route jurisdiction transfer study. Commissioners and staff said the current state highway system is generally well connected and that wholesale realignment is not needed, but they recommended clarifying statutory criteria, improving the transfer process, increasing interagency coordination, and making data analysis more transparent. Members asked about why transfers occur, who pays for maintenance after a transfer, how often transfers happen, and how the Legislature’s role should be understood. Staff said there have been only 16 RJT transfers since 1991, with a net transfer of about 10 miles of state highway to cities, while DOT abandonments happen more often but are not tracked as consistently. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 2172, which would fold longer abandonments and bridge-related abandonments into the RJT process, require pre-request conferences, expand legislative review of costs and risks, and update highway criteria. Tacoma officials, the Transportation Commission, counties, cities, and the Transportation Improvement Board testified in support, citing transparency, local input, and the need to address large bridge and corridor transfers; the bill sponsor said a substitute would allow agreed transfers to proceed without final legislative approval, but send disputed cases to the Legislature. The bill was also described as having an indeterminate fiscal impact, with WSDOT estimating possible added maintenance costs if transfers are delayed. The committee next heard House Bill 1367, which would allow motorcycles to use the right shoulder of limited-access highways under specific congestion conditions. The bill and a proposed substitute would limit shoulder use to wide shoulders, require hazard lights, cap speed at 10 mph over adjacent traffic, and bar passing other vehicles on the shoulder; the fiscal note projected costs for driver education and possible maintenance and signage impacts. The sponsor argued the bill would reduce rider fatigue, heat stress, and rear-end risk in stop-and-go traffic, while opponents from law enforcement and WSDOT said shoulders are intended for emergencies, debris and visibility create safety risks, and the proposal could increase maintenance and enforcement burdens. Several motorcyclists and advocates supported the bill as a safer alternative to lane splitting, while a student and some agencies said it would give riders a more predictable option; the committee then closed the hearing. The committee also heard House Bill 2174, which would create “crash prevention zones” in areas with repeated serious collisions or fatalities. The bill would allow cities, counties, towns, or WSDOT to designate zones after a public hearing, require engineering and traffic studies, increase enforcement, and impose a $73 penalty for certain infractions within signed zones, with revenue dedicated to safety work in the zone. The sponsor pointed to dangerous stretches of Highway 395 and Highway 12 in eastern Washington and said the bill is intended as a temporary safety tool until long-term fixes are completed. Counties and cities supported the concept and asked for liability protections and language from a Senate companion bill; the committee then moved to House Bill 2718, a transportation permitting and project-delivery bill. Staff said HB 2718 would impose timelines and deemed-approval rules for certain state and federal permits, require early outreach to affected governments and tribes, create a public contractor-rating website, and direct WSDOT to report on permit-streamlining options by December 1, 2027. The sponsor said the bill is meant to reduce delays and costs in transportation projects by improving accountability, coordination, and permitting efficiency.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Education Committee Jul 16th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • Institute, increasing funding by just $1,000 per student over three years resulted in a full grade-level
  • As we enter a period of uncertainty at the federal level where local funding will play an even greater
  • As we enter a period of uncertainty at the federal level where local funding will play an even greater
  • This bill seeks to create a program that will aspirationally fund non-basic-aid schools at levels closer
  • Direct-funded charter schools are funded essentially at the same levels as non-basic-aid school districts
Summary: The Assembly Education Committee met without a quorum for much of the hearing and heard several bills out of order. SB 249 by Senator Umberg would move county board of education elections from the primary to the statewide general election. Supporters, including the League of Women Voters and many educators, argued the change would increase turnout and make the electorate more representative. The Orange County Board of Education opposed the bill, saying it would increase costs, reduce local control, and bury education races on crowded general-election ballots. The chair and members discussed turnout, cost, and representation, but the bill was held pending a quorum. Senator Grove presented SB 373, which adds safeguards for California students placed in out-of-state non-public schools through IEPs. The bill would require more robust LEA and CDE oversight, including annual site visits, student interviews, quarterly contact, stronger certification standards, and restrictions on prone, supine, and mechanical restraints. Testimony from a survivor of an out-of-state placement and from advocates emphasized abuse, neglect, and the need for stronger monitoring. There was broad support and no opposition testimony, but the measure was also held pending a quorum. Senator Ashby presented SB 568, the epinephrine in schools modernization act, to clarify and expand requirements for stocked epinephrine so they clearly apply to all public schools, including preschool programs. School nurses and medical experts said the bill would close gaps created by universal preschool and ensure life-saving treatment is available for anaphylaxis. The committee discussed dosing and implementation, and the bill was supported without opposition testimony. The committee also heard SB 414, the Charter School Accountability Act, which would strengthen fiscal oversight, audit standards, and transparency for charter schools and authorizers. Supporters said it responds to fraud and audit findings while preserving charter flexibility; opponents, including school employees and teachers, said it did not go far enough on authorizer accountability and small-district oversight. After discussion, the committee voted 7-0 to pass SB 414 as amended to Appropriations. The committee also briefly heard SB 743 by Senator Cortese, which would create an equalization reserve account to provide additional funding to underfunded school districts and reduce funding inequities tied to ZIP code. The author said the bill would support student achievement and teacher retention over time. The transcript cuts off before testimony or action on SB 743 was completed.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Feb 10th, 2026

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • coordination and to expedite services and support such as behavioral health resources at the local level
  • And also the role of the managing entities as we look at budgetary constraints that are definitely here
  • importance of bringing peer support specialists together so that they can network at a more macro level
  • journey 10 years in front of you, and so imagine... ...imagine bringing that together on a statewide level
Bills: S0556 , S0794 , S1600
MO
Transcript Highlights:
  • administration, I wanted Missouri to align with the spirit of President Trump's DOGE efforts at the federal level
  • Simply put, the days of excusing budgetary decisions with fund balances and so-called surpluses are simply
  • Advanced Nuclear Energy Task Force to build on the work being led by President Trump at the federal level
  • Violent crime committed by juveniles has reached a concerning level in Missouri.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Budget Feb 16th, 2026 at 12:00 pm

Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's at every level of government.
  • It's at every level of government.
  • So can you just, I guess, high level, explain what happened with the federal repayment?
  • know, when we say the level of care, we can't say it's a humongous amount.
  • It's only been at the circuit level.
Committee: House Budget
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee Aug 26th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • It talks about the reserve level maximum, 75%, those sorts of things.
  • It talks about the, you know, the reserve level maximum, 75%, those sorts of things.
  • That is exempt as well if it's exempted again at the state level.
  • versus the local level and how that correlates to the number of centers.
  • versus the local level and how that correlates to the number of centers.
Summary: The Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee met with a quorum and approved the prior minutes. Staff reviewed the interim work schedule, noting that most assigned studies were complete and that the final meeting would be September 29, with remaining work focused on economic development tax incentives, the stripper well exemption, and property tax reform items such as the primary residence credit. The committee then took up a referral on political subdivision compliance with state law, especially reserve limits and levy calculations. State Auditor Josh Gallion explained the audit standards used for local governments, the state auditor’s limited authority to force compliance, and the practical challenges created by a shortage of auditors. He used Stark County and Mountrail County examples to show how reserve balances affect levy calculations, including Stark County’s 2023 general fund levy issue and Mountrail County’s zero-levy approach. Stark County Commission Chair Neil Messer defended his county’s decision to keep reserves for major projects and volatility in oil-related revenues, while acknowledging the county remained out of compliance with the 75% reserve rule. Committee members and staff discussed possible enforcement mechanisms, the role of county auditors, and whether the law should be changed to better fit current fiscal conditions. Linda from the Association of Counties and Matt Gardner from the League of Cities said both organizations have been heavily training local officials on the new tax cap and reserve rules. Linda said counties and cities are using standardized worksheets for the 3% cap and levy limitations, and suggested that an affidavit certifying compliance could be attached to levy submissions. She also clarified that the primary residence credit does not reduce mill levies; it only reduces the taxpayer’s bill. Gardner said city auditors receive required finance training and that his organization was unaware of current city reserve noncompliance. The committee did not take action on the issue and planned to revisit it at the September 29 meeting. The final portion of the meeting moved into a subcommittee report on the property tax statement, where Representative Headland introduced a bill draft to remove the legislative property tax relief line from the statement for further committee discussion.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Dec 4th, 2025 at 01:30 pm

Agriculture & Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So as you can see, this is a year that was obviously below our normal level.
  • Ultimately, the harvest levels are going to be set by the Board of Natural.
  • This is a state agency that is not a cabinet-level position.
  • Yeah, I didn't get into that level, like operational detail, you mean?
  • I didn't get into that level of analysis.
Summary: The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee held a December 4 work session focused first on a Department of Natural Resources update. Commissioner of Public Lands Dave Upthe Grove outlined the agency’s size and responsibilities, previewed several agency-request bills, and emphasized budget-related priorities: authority to sell ecosystem service credits, greater flexibility to use underutilized water rights for drought relief and rural/agricultural support, adding a tribal representative to the Board of Natural Resources, timber-sale efficiency changes, and inclusion of wildland firefighters in the LEOFF pension system. He also strongly urged restoration of wildfire prevention and preparedness funding, warning that cuts would reduce firefighters, forest health work, and support for rural fire districts. He said the agency supports funding the negotiated Washington Public Employees Association contract. State Forester George Geisler then reviewed the wildfire season, describing year-round fire response, mutual aid to other states, 31 aircraft used, 691 seasonal firefighters, and more than 180 corrections-based crew members. He said DNR’s success rate for keeping fires under 10 acres improved to 94.1 percent, and highlighted early detection and rapid response on the Crescent Road Fire, which was contained to 182 acres with no structures lost. He also noted 53 confirmed arson fires, mostly around Spokane, and said the department’s use of bulldozers and other ground resources is increasingly important alongside aircraft. Assistant Deputy Supervisor Dwayne Emmons presented on the trust land transfer program, explaining that it was codified in statute in 2023 after decades of being funded through the capital budget. He said the program moves non-performing or underperforming trust lands to other public entities while keeping the trust whole through replacement land purchases. He described recent funded projects, including Bechler 6, Okanogan G, South Lake Ozette, and portions of Yakama Nation’s Tract C, and said DNR is requesting funding for remaining parcels such as Tract C, Babcock Bench, and Middle Fork Snoqualmie. The committee then shifted to a historical overview of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife by staffer Jeff Olson, who traced the agency’s evolution from early fish and game commissions to the current Fish and Wildlife Commission structure established in 1995. He summarized the commission’s statutory duties and appointment structure, and noted that in other states the director may be appointed either by the governor or by a commission. In discussion, the chair said he was not proposing immediate legislation to change the commission, but wanted to explore accountability and possible reforms, including whether the department should again become a cabinet-level agency. No votes were taken, and the meeting adjourned with no objection.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, as you can see, this is a year that was obviously below our normal level.
  • So as you can see, this is a year that was obviously below our normal level.
  • This is a state agency that is not a cabinet-level position.
  • Yeah, I didn't get into that level, like operational detail, you mean?
  • I didn't get into that level of analysis.
Summary: The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee held a work session with an update from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Commissioner Dave Upthe Grove outlined DNR’s size and scope, previewed agency-request legislation, and emphasized budget priorities. He said DNR will seek authority to sell ecosystem service credits, better use underutilized water rights with tribal consultation, add a tribal representative to the State Board of Natural Resources, make minor timber-sales efficiencies, and include wildland firefighters in the LEOFF pension system. He also urged restoration of wildfire prevention and preparedness funding, warning that reduced funding would mean fewer firefighters, less forest health work, and less support for rural fire districts. He noted DNR’s wildfire suppression costs are rising and argued prevention spending can reduce larger, more expensive fires. State Forester George Geisler followed with a detailed wildfire season review. He said Washington now responds to fires year-round and also assists other states, including Texas. He described DNR’s use of 31 aircraft, 691 firefighters, and corrections-based crews, and said the agency’s success rate for keeping fires under 10 acres improved slightly from 93.7% to 94.1%. He highlighted increased arson activity, especially around Spokane, and described the Crescent Road Fire as an example of early detection, rapid response, and the use of bulldozers, aircraft, and hand crews to contain a fire to 182 acres with no structure losses. Senator Saldan praised the emphasis on prevention and the use of bulldozers as cost-effective tools. Assistant deputy supervisor Dwayne Emmons then reviewed the trust land transfer program, which was codified in statute in 2023 after being funded through the capital budget for decades. He said more than 130,000 acres of underperforming trust land have been transferred since the 1990s to other public or tribal entities for more appropriate use, while DNR acquires replacement lands to keep the trust whole. He described the current application and ranking process, including tribal input, and said DNR is requesting funding for remaining parcels from the last round, including portions of Tract C, Babcock Bench, and Middle Fork Snoqualmie. In questions, Senator Wagoner raised concerns about DNR’s decision to remove some acres from timber harvest rotation and its impact on local revenue and mills; the commissioner responded that current five-year harvest plans provide short-term stability and that any changes would be explored through the Board of Natural Resources process, not through immediate reductions in supply. The committee then received a history briefing from staff member Jeff Olson on the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission and agency structure. He traced the evolution from early fish and game commissioners to the current commission-appointed director model adopted by voter-approved Referendum 45 in 1995. Olson explained the commission’s statutory duties, membership requirements, and how Washington compares with other states. Chair Chapman said he had no plans to hear a bill this session changing the commission’s makeup, but he expressed personal interest in exploring reforms, accountability, and possibly a future broader coalition or referendum process. No votes were taken; the meeting was informational only, and the chair adjourned the session with holiday and New Year’s wishes.