Video & Transcript : 'Minnesota Statutes 474A.02' :
Page 267 of 500
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Thu Feb 13, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- :02:20.760><c> at</c><01:02:21.559><c> a</c><01:02:21.760><c> recent</c><01:02:22.160><c> Elementary<
- /c><01:02:52.559><c> are</c><01:02:52.760><c> from</c><01:02:53.039><c> elementary</c><01:02:53.640><
- age Ki some<01:02:55.200><c> are</c><01:02:55.680><c> and</c><01:02:55.880><c> as</c><01:02:56.039><
- c> young</c><01:02:56.279><c> as</c><01:02:56.520><c> 7</c><01:02:57.200><c> years</c><01:02:57.520><
- ><c> any</c><02:00:32.480><c> other</c><02:00:32.679><c> questions</c><02:00:32.960><c> or</c><02:00:
Committee:
House Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on several bills. HB 655 would limit collection of unpaid motor vehicle taxes, fees, and penalties to the most recent five consecutive years of delinquency. The Department of Transportation opposed the bill, saying it could significantly affect state and county revenues and that the fiscal impact was hard to estimate. The Tax Foundation noted the bill would shorten the existing collection period, while an individual testifier supported it as a narrow measure that would help owners of old or inherited vehicles. In questioning, the department said it could not quantify the cost but suggested it would prefer case-by-case flexibility rather than a fixed five-year limit.
HB 697 would authorize Department of Transportation and Department of Law Enforcement personnel to inspect and certify evidence from automated speed enforcement systems and would appropriate funds for the program. The Department of Transportation supported the measure, citing the workload created by the red-light camera pilot and the need to assist police and prosecutors. The Department of the Attorney General supported the concept but recommended technical amendments so the verification language would apply consistently across the chapter and allow the appropriate reviewing entity to act. The committee also heard support from the AAHU Metropolitan Planning Organization and opposition from three individuals.
HB 711 would require defendants convicted of causing the death of a parent or legal guardian of a minor child while driving under the influence to provide financial support to the surviving child. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing that criminal restitution must be tied to verified losses and that this type of long-term support is better handled in civil court, where trusts, conservatorships, and insurance claims can be addressed. The Department of Transportation supported the bill as a deterrent to impaired driving, and police, prosecutors, and an injury prevention group also submitted support. Members questioned whether the measure was better suited to civil litigation, and the public defender agreed that the civil system was the proper venue.
HB 108 would allow direct shipment of beer and distilled spirits by certain licensees and require county liquor commissions to adopt rules. The Attorney General raised constitutional concerns, saying the bill’s different treatment of out-of-state manufacturers could violate the dormant Commerce Clause and recommended revisions. Brewers and distillers testified in support, saying the bill would put beer and spirits on a similar footing with wine direct shipment, help small producers reach consumers, and support the local economy without increasing underage access. They also said the bill should be amended to address grandfathering language. No final votes or committee actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
ECD Public Hearing - Wed Feb 11, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST
Economic Development & Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> would</c><02:02:30.000><c> be</c><02:02:30.639><c> in</c><02:02:30.880><c> the</c><02:02:31.040>
- > statutes</c><02:30:40.000><c> um</c><02:30:40.160><c> prior</c><02:30:40.479><c> to</c><02:30:40.640
- ><c> a</c> the criminal statutes um prior to a the criminal statutes um prior to a regulatory<02:30:42.000
- 57.840><c> statute,</c><03:02:58.319><c> the</c><03:02:58.479><c> FBED</c> even though it is in statute
- , the FBED even though it is in statute, the FBED has<03:02:58.960><c> not</c><03:02:59.680><c> actively
Committee:
House Economic Development & Technology
Keywords:
business development, arts, cultural affairs, Hawaii, commissions, administrative transfer, funding appropriation, Hawaiian culture, sense of place, land management, environmental stewardship, cultural preservation, 910, house, all
Summary:
The committee heard several bills related to permitting and economic development. On HB 2603, relating to permits, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development said it supported the measure with comments. Committee discussion focused on the fact that the state’s facilitated permit process appears to have been rarely or never used, the need to identify specific projects that would use it, and whether DBEDT would need dedicated staffing to administer it. DBEDT said it had found no projects under the current process, had no capacity to run the program as structured, and estimated it would need about 7 to 9 FTEs, including permitting, coordination, data, systems, and possibly legal support. The chair suggested exploring a staff assignment and comparing the concept to federal FAST-41-style expedited permitting.
On HB 2140, relating to essential permitting positions, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development again supported the bill with comments. Testimony and questioning centered on a pilot program to help counties pay competitively for permitting staff. A DBEDT representative said the issue of competitive pay affected both county and state permitting offices and that the bill was intended as a temporary pilot, though a more permanent solution would be preferable. When asked how counties would fund the salary support, the witness said that was not yet discussed with the counties and agreed to follow up. The committee also noted the bill applies to participating counties.
On HB 2598, relating to the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, the State Procurement Office and HTDC offered comments, and the Department of the Attorney General raised constitutional concerns. The AG said the bill’s residency-based certification requirements, when tied to procurement, could implicate the dormant Commerce Clause, and that the required 1% contribution tied to state contracts raised unconstitutional-conditions concerns. In questioning, the AG characterized these as legal risks rather than automatic lawsuits. The committee did not take a vote.
The committee then heard HB 2141, relating to state enterprise zones. Taxation, DBEDT, HCDA, the University of Hawaii Cancer Center, and HTDC testified in support, while the Tax Foundation noted the program was intended to help economically depressed areas create jobs. HTDC said the bill would help preserve the Maui Research and Technology Center’s enterprise-zone status after rezoning. Committee discussion focused on whether the enterprise zone program is being used effectively, how the bill might attract businesses to areas where the state is investing, and whether the program’s labor requirements are too burdensome for new businesses. DBEDT explained that the program requires a 10% workforce increase in the first year, which must be sustained, and said it promotes the program through county coordinators and in-person outreach. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion provided.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session-Day 6, February 16, 2026-PM
Wyoming House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- c><02:03:12.400><c> legislation</c> statutes, in which case the legislation statutes, in which case the
- 02:03:50.159><c> at</c><02:03:50.320><c> line</c><02:03:50.639><c> 17</c><02:03:51.360><c> it</c><02:
- c> legislation relates to title 13 of legislation relates to title 13 of Wyoming<02:04:01.040><c> statutes
- </c> Wyoming statutes in which case the Wyoming statutes in which case the legislation<02:04:03.360><
- 02:13:33.920><c> so</c><02:13:34.079><c> I</c><02:13:34.239><c> would</c><02:13:34.320><c> ask</c><02
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Minerals, Business & Economic Development, February 16, 2026
Minerals, Business & Economic Development
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:02:01.680><c> I</c><00:02:01.920><c> am</c><00:02:02.079><c> the</c><00:02:02.320><c> bringer
- [snorts] Uh,<00:02:07.119><c> this</c><00:02:07.360><c> is</c><00:02:07.759><c> called</c><00:02:07.920
- This<00:02:32.720><c> provides</c><00:02:33.200><c> legislative</c><00:02:33.920><c> findings</c> This
- <c> for</c><00:02:40.160><c> an</c><00:02:40.400><c> expedited</c><00:02:41.200><c> licensing</c><00:
- And<00:02:52.480><c> you</c><00:02:52.720><c> know</c><00:02:52.879><c> that</c><00:02:53.200><c> sounds
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (01/28/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- :17.879><c> the</c><00:02:18.080><c> child</c><00:02:18.360><c> as</c><00:02:18.519><c> a</c><00:02:18.920
- :20.920><c> or</c><00:02:21.120><c> her</c><00:02:21.720><c> tax</c><00:02:22.360><c> return</c><00:02
- Barton who<00:02:26.280><c> is</c><00:02:26.400><c> the</c><00:02:26.560><c> Prime</c><00:02:26.879>
- <c> sponsor</c> not<00:02:32.360><c> yet</c><00:02:32.879><c> there</c><00:02:33.120><c> we</c><00:02
- <02:01:27.480><c> that</c><02:01:27.760><c> is</c><02:01:27.880><c> or</c><02:01:28.159><c> was</c><02
Summary:
The House Children and Family Law Committee met on January 28, 2025, and first heard House Bill 322, which would give a parent paying child support the exclusive right to claim the child as a dependent on taxes. Representative Barton, the sponsor, argued that because child support is no longer tax-deductible, the paying parent should at least receive the child tax credit. Committee members and later testimony from New Hampshire Legal Assistance raised concerns that the bill would override court discretion, could disadvantage low-income custodial parents, and would not account for cases where child support payments are small or where parents share support unevenly. Several members noted that judges already allocate dependency claims in divorce orders and can modify those orders when circumstances change.
After testimony, the committee moved to ITL (inexpedient to legislate) HB 322. The motion was seconded, discussion continued, and the roll call was unanimous in favor of ITL. The committee then placed the bill on consent and ended the executive session on HB 322.
The committee next took up House Bill 325, which would eliminate term and reimbursement alimony in no-fault divorces. Representative Barton testified that alimony in those cases was akin to involuntary servitude and should not survive dissolution of the marriage contract. The hearing then moved into questions about whether alimony is meant to compensate a spouse for sacrifices made during the marriage, such as supporting a partner through school or staying home with children, and the sponsor maintained that post-divorce support should not continue as a marital obligation. The transcript cuts off before any vote or further action on HB 325 is shown.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- c> statute</c><02:21:56.080><c> to</c> Creating a new homicide statute to Creating a new homicide statute
- :29:18.720><c> under</c><02:29:19.040><c> this</c><02:29:19.279><c> statute.
- </c><02:29:20.000><c> So</c><02:29:20.399><c> simply</c> needed under this statute.
- ><c> statute</c><02:37:42.000><c> to</c><02:37:42.319><c> our</c><02:37:42.560><c> current</c><02:37:
- /c><02:37:47.359><c> to</c><02:37:48.560><c> um</c> statute?
Committee:
House Judiciary
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on House Bill 1067-FN, which would formalize and expand mental health courts in New Hampshire and create a grant-based funding structure for them. Representative Mark Pearson, the prime sponsor, described the bill as a bipartisan, compassionate, and cost-effective approach that would connect people with mental illness to treatment and supervision instead of incarceration, while still holding them accountable. He said the proposal was developed with input from the judicial branch, law enforcement, corrections, mental health organizations, and others, and emphasized that local courts could tailor programs to their needs.
Committee members questioned the bill’s fiscal note, whether the legislature had previously studied the issue, how the program would be funded, and whether the bill should more explicitly address treatment, prevention, and data collection. Representative Buzz Sher, who helped develop the bill, explained how mental health courts work, including referral, clinical and public-safety assessments, case management, goal-setting, and graduation from the program. He said existing New Hampshire mental health courts are mostly partial and county-funded, and that the bill would formalize them, set standards, and allow grant funding. He also cited data from Georgia and New Hampshire suggesting significant savings from reduced incarceration and related costs.
Members also raised concerns about due process, whether people not formally charged could be swept into the system, and whether individuals with violent offenses or domestic violence histories could be diverted inappropriately. Sher responded that only people already in the criminal justice process are eligible and that courts use safety assessments to screen out most violent cases. The committee requested that Sher file supporting financial data from other jurisdictions, and he agreed to do so. No vote or final action was taken during the hearing.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Appropriations and Revenue (3-3-26)
Appropriations & Revenue
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:02:03.520><c> PHS</c><00:02:04.120><c> 1</c><00:02:04.479><c> is</c><00:02:04.640><c> adopted
- </c><00:02:10.880><c> And</c><00:02:11.240><c> if</c><00:02:11.360><c> each</c><00:02:11.600><c> of</
- </c> Josh<00:02:27.600><c> Bray,</c><00:02:28.480><c> current</c><00:02:28.840><c> vice</c><00:02:29.080
- Um we have Again,<00:02:47.360><c> 503</c><00:02:48.040><c> as</c><00:02:48.200><c> amended</c><00:02
- um last<00:02:54.959><c> week,</c><00:02:55.200><c> I</c><00:02:55.280><c> believe</c><00:02:55.560>
Committee:
House Appropriations & Revenue
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Ways and Means (02/12/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> am</c><02:02:02.560><c> here</c><02:02:03.159><c> because</c><02:02:03.400><c> I</c><02:02:03.480
- the</c><02:02:23.560><c> corner</c><02:02:24.040><c> office</c><02:02:24.400><c> of</c><02:02:24.560
- 29.599><c> we</c><02:02:29.719><c> have</c><02:02:29.960><c> heard</c><02:02:30.199><c> from</c><02:02
- /c><02:02:39.560><c> that</c><02:02:39.679><c> would</c><02:02:39.920><c> affect</c><02:02:40.360><c>
- why</c><02:02:49.280><c> do</c><02:02:49.480><c> we</c><02:02:49.639><c> need</c><02:02:50.599><c> to
Summary:
The committee held a public hearing on HB 402, a bill to repeal a provision in RSA 194-F:2 stating that Education Freedom Account (EFA) funds “shall not constitute taxable income” to the parent or student. The bill sponsor argued the current language is misleading because the state cannot determine federal tax liability, and said the bill would simply remove inaccurate tax advice from state law. He cited IRS guidance and prior federal legislation, including a Ted Cruz proposal, to suggest some EFA uses may be taxable under federal law, while others may not, and said the bill could be amended if needed to avoid confusion.
Testimony was sharply divided. Py Campbell opposed the bill, arguing it would unfairly single out EFA students and could amount to a tax on education funds, including for self-employed families, and recommended it be voted inexpedient to legislate. Stephen Matthew French, a tax preparer, also opposed the bill, saying IRS Publication 970 already makes clear that scholarship-type payments used for tuition and related expenses are not taxable, and that the bill addresses a problem that does not exist. He warned that adding tax reporting requirements could create administrative costs for families and the program administrator.
Bill Ardinger, a tax attorney, supported the repeal of the statutory language, saying the state should not place potentially incorrect tax advice into law. He explained that under federal tax law, only certain scholarship-like uses are exempt, while many EFA-eligible expenses may not be, especially for families using the program for homeschooling or other nontraditional expenses. He said the current statute could mislead families into thinking all EFA payments are tax-free and could expose the state to future legal problems. The hearing ended after questions from committee members; no vote or final action was taken in the transcript.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- Um that statute does require the Um that statute does require the attorney<02:12:45.840><c> general</
- contemacious non-payment statute<02:16:48.240><c> and</c><02:16:48.479><c> it</c><02:16:48.880><c> inserts
- </c><02:16:49.439><c> the</c><02:16:49.679><c> language</c><02:16:50.080><c> in</c> statute and it inserts
- </c><02:20:08.160><c> to</c><02:20:08.399><c> the</c><02:20:08.720><c> statute</c> that there's updates
- made to the statute that there's updates made to the statute um<02:20:09.840><c> specifically</c><02
Committee:
House Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 2046, which would establish and fund an Olo Hawaii Commission to coordinate and promote initiatives supporting the use of Olo Hawaii. The Attorney General suggested adding an end date because the bill creates a temporary commission, and several supporters from the University of Hawaii, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, and the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission said the commission could improve coordination, funding decisions, and consistency across agencies. Members discussed whether the commission should include broader representation, including expertise on Niihau dialect speakers and other stakeholders, and the bill was then set aside as the committee moved to the next measure.
The committee next considered House Bill 2438, creating the Hawaii Cultural Trust within DBEDT, authorizing an income tax credit for contributions to the trust and qualified cultural organizations, and creating a special license plate to support the trust. DBEDT said it would need additional resources, including staff, to administer the program. The Department of Taxation recommended changing the effective date to 2026 to allow time for implementation and adding a requirement that credits be claimed within one year. OHA supported the bill but objected to language that would require it to maintain a prequalified list of organizations, saying that could limit applicants and conflict with its grant process. The Tax Foundation said it supported cultural funding but preferred direct appropriations and grants over a trust fund and tax credit structure.
The final measure discussed was House Bill 2584, which would temporarily increase public land trust revenues transferred to OHA while reaffirming the state’s obligation to the 20% pro rata share, with a repeal date of June 30, 2028. The Attorney General recommended deleting the bill’s requirement that OHA receive a minimum amount equal to the 20% share, arguing the constitution and Admission Act do not specify a precise dollar amount and that the legislature must determine allocation. OHA strongly supported the bill, arguing the state currently pays only about 5% and that historical records show much higher amounts are owed; OHA also pointed to a carry-forward account it said held about $55 million. DLNR opposed the bill because the fiscal impact was unspecified and could affect land management and special fund budgets. Several OHA trustees and supporters urged the committee to pass the bill, and one testifier criticized the state for underfunding Native Hawaiian obligations. No votes were taken in the portion provided, and the committee continued hearing testimony on HB 2584.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- And she<01:02:32.000><c> mentioned</c><01:02:32.319><c> that,</c><01:02:32.559><c> you</c><01:02:32.720
- /c><01:02:35.839><c> men</c><01:02:36.000><c> at</c><01:02:36.240><c> night</c><01:02:36.400><c> when
- </c><01:02:37.680><c> So</c><01:02:37.839><c> that</c><01:02:38.079><c> made</c><01:02:38.240><c> me<
- </c><01:02:42.720><c> And</c><01:02:43.040><c> so</c><01:02:43.280><c> for</c><01:02:43.520><c> a</c>
- And so for a while<01:02:43.839><c> it</c><01:02:44.079><c> should</c><01:02:44.240><c> be</c><01:02:
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Health and Human Services (01/22/2025)
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- :02:55.360><c> a</c><02:02:55.639><c> I'm</c><02:02:55.760><c> so</c><02:02:55.920><c> glad</c><02:02
- that you're willing<02:02:56.599><c> to</c><02:02:56.800><c> continue</c><02:02:57.079><c> to</c><02
- :02:57.239><c> work</c><02:02:57.400><c> on</c><02:02:57.560><c> this</c><02:02:57.719><c> bill</c> willing
- <02:02:58.560><c> hope</c><02:02:58.719><c> to</c><02:02:58.840><c> be</c><02:02:58.960><c> invited</
- c><02:02:59.280><c> to</c><02:02:59.400><c> the</c><02:02:59.520><c> table</c><02:02:59.840><c> to</c
Committee:
Senate Health and Human Services
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, June 11, 2026 - PM
Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- /c><00:02:04.240><c> state</c><00:02:04.479><c> trust</c><00:02:04.799><c> lands</c><00:02:05.119><c>
- :02:12.400><c> service,</c><00:02:13.040><c> uh</c><00:02:13.280><c> those</c><00:02:13.680><c> two</
- of<00:02:17.599><c> the</c><00:02:17.840><c> federal</c><00:02:18.239><c> lands</c><00:02:18.640><c>
- Um,<00:02:21.040><c> and</c><00:02:21.760><c> it</c><00:02:22.000><c> is</c><00:02:22.239><c> those</
- So,<00:02:40.560><c> for</c><00:02:40.720><c> example,</c><00:02:41.519><c> uh,</c><00:02:41.680><c>
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> I</c><00:02:04.439><c> I</c><00:02:04.520><c> did</c><00:02:04.680><c> make</c><00:02:04.880><c>
- c> 12</c><00:02:09.319><c> it</c><00:02:09.440><c> has</c><00:02:09.599><c> the</c><00:02:09.759><c>
- /c><00:02:13.160><c> year's</c><00:02:13.520><c> Bill</c><00:02:13.760><c> had</c><00:02:13.879><c> a
- would</c><00:02:22.640><c> have</c><00:02:22.760><c> made</c><00:02:23.000><c> the</c><00:02:23.120>
- 00:02:26.160><c> in</c><00:02:26.360><c> person</c><00:02:27.200><c> so</c><00:02:27.440><c> I</c><00
Committee:
Senate Ways and Means
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- And then she's<00:02:15.680><c> able</c><00:02:15.840><c> to</c><00:02:16.000><c> use</c><00:02:16.239
- ><c> some</c><00:02:16.400><c> of</c><00:02:16.480><c> our</c><00:02:16.720><c> 900</c><00:02:17.200>
- </c><00:02:23.280><c> And</c><00:02:23.440><c> so</c><00:02:23.599><c> this</c><00:02:23.840><c> will
- <00:02:31.840><c> that</c><00:02:32.080><c> in</c><00:02:32.319><c> to</c><00:02:32.640><c> this.
- Chairman, that's<00:02:34.720><c> it</c><00:02:34.879><c> in</c><00:02:35.120><c> a</c><00:02:35.280>
Committee:
Senate Appropriations
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><01:02:11.119><c> to</c><01:02:11.200><c> just</c><01:02:11.359><c> give</c><01:02:11.440><c> you
- ><c> little</c><01:02:11.839><c> bit</c><01:02:12.000><c> of</c><01:02:12.160><c> background</c><01:02
- It builds on<01:02:17.760><c> last</c><01:02:18.079><c> year's</c><01:02:18.480><c> bill</c><01:02:19.599
- 02:47.200><c> time</c><01:02:47.359><c> and</c><01:02:47.680><c> was</c><01:02:47.839><c> signed</c><
- And the current<01:02:50.640><c> bill</c><01:02:50.880><c> that</c><01:02:51.040><c> you</c><01:02:51.200
Committee:
Senate Judiciary
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:02:06.680><c> Senate</c><01:02:07.000><c> Bill</c><01:02:07.200><c> 20</c><01:02:07.520><c> will<
- be important<01:02:08.160><c> as</c><01:02:08.400><c> to</c><01:02:08.680><c> we</c><01:02:08.839><c
- </c><01:02:13.079><c> cost</c><01:02:13.319><c> of</c><01:02:13.440><c> re</c><01:02:13.599><c> tant<
- ><c> is</c><01:02:14.599><c> foundational</c><01:02:15.200><c> to</c><01:02:15.359><c> the</c><01:02:
- <c> I</c><01:02:20.160><c> thank</c><01:02:20.319><c> you</c><01:02:20.440><c> for</c><01:02:20.599><
Committee:
Senate Finance
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- If<02:02:27.280><c> not,</c><02:02:27.520><c> clerk</c><02:02:27.679><c> will</c><02:02:27.760><c> call
- If not, the<02:02:32.400><c> clerk</c><02:02:32.639><c> will</c><02:02:32.960><c> take</c><02:02:33.119
- With 39 votes<02:02:35.520><c> in</c><02:02:35.599><c> the</c><02:02:35.679><c> affirmative</c><02:02
- Senate Bill 413,<02:02:36.800><c> I'm</c><02:02:36.880><c> received</c><02:02:37.040><c> a</c><02:02
- >> Senate<02:02:40.560><c> bill</c><02:02:40.880><c> 645,</c><02:02:42.000><c> Senator</c><02:02
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (04/08/2026)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- :01:33.520><c> way</c><02:01:33.760><c> there</c><02:01:34.000><c> it</c> statute and true uh this way
- there it statute and true uh this way there it takes<02:01:34.400><c> away</c><02:01:34.560><c> the<
- It's this one.<02:02:03.920><c> And</c><02:02:04.080><c> thankfully</c><02:02:04.400><c> I</c><02:02:
- 02:33.280><c> year</c><02:02:33.520><c> at</c><02:02:33.679><c> the</c><02:02:33.840><c> Big</c><02:02
- it in statute<02:03:26.639><c> quite</c><02:03:26.960><c> frankly.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- And then we have the Minnesota Supplemental Aid program that assists older adults, general assistance
- But Minnesota Housing Support, Minnesota Supplemental Aid, and General Assistance are all state-funded
- The next two slides are actually from a survey from the Minnesota Department of Health.
- These options are especially strained in greater Minnesota.
- I will conclude by representing the hundreds of Minnesota families like ours.
Committee:
House Human Services Finance and Policy
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Having considered<02:00:08.080><c> the</c><02:00:08.239><c> same,</c><02:00:08.480><c> report</c><02:
- considered<02:00:18.159><c> the</c><02:00:18.320><c> same</c><02:00:18.480><c> and</c><02:00:18.639>
- 02:00:19.920><c> majority</c><02:00:20.639><c> report</c><02:00:20.960><c> with</c><02:00:21.119><c>
- Questions<02:00:37.679><c> on</c><02:00:37.840><c> the</c><02:00:38.000><c> adoption</c><02:00:38.320
- <02:30:31.040><c> If</c><02:30:31.200><c> we</c><02:30:31.359><c> were</c><02:30:31.520><c> to</c><02