Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, I've been an attorney for over 30 years. nine cities as city attorney, and I have served as
• We had our Texas Attorney General, and I think that’s a great point.
• Let me have this attorney answer that question. Okay.
• Earl, you're a former city attorney.
• I've been city attorney for nine cities, including deputy city attorney and assistant deputy for the

Bills: HB148, HB334, HB554, HB762, HB1520, HB1593, HB3526, HB3810, HB5092, SB2215, HB2607, HB148

Keywords: family leave, leave pool, county employee, sick leave, vacation leave, family care, pandemic, guardianship, HB 554, fireworks, Juneteenth, Juneteenth holiday, retail fireworks permit, Texas Occupations Code, Local Government Code, county commissioners court, drought conditions, Texas A&M Forest Service, fire safety, holiday sales

Transcript Highlights:

• And with me to testify are Deputy Attorneys General Tiffany Brokaw and Michael Cohen.
• Tiffany Brokaw, Deputy Attorney General, here on behalf of Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is proud to
• Tiffany Brokaw, Deputy Attorney General, here on behalf of Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is proud to
• For these reasons, Attorney General Bonta requests an aye vote on AB 331. Thank you.
• We are willing and look forward to engaging with both the author's office and the Attorney General to

Summary: The Assembly Elections Committee met on March 26, 2025, adopted its 2025-26 committee rules, and approved a five-bill consent calendar. The committee then heard several election-related measures focused on transparency, accessibility, and election administration. AB 775 (Fong) would modernize behested payment reporting by extending filing deadlines, requiring direct filing with the FPPC in most cases, and improving online public access; the FPPC chair testified in strong support, and the bill drew no opposition. AB 287 (Lackey) would require vote centers and polling places to provide accessible parking and curbside voting accommodations for voters with disabilities; Los Angeles County election officials and Disability Rights California supported the bill, while LAUSD raised concerns about parking shortages and storage costs and requested amendments. AB 331 (Pellerin) would clarify that certification of election results is a ministerial duty, address misleading ballot return envelopes, and ensure voter information guides reach incarcerated voters in a usable format; the Attorney General’s office sponsored the bill, while the Secretary of State expressed concerns about the feasibility of a state takeover of county canvassing and said it was working on a solution with the author. The committee members generally supported the bills, emphasizing transparency, voter access, and election integrity. AB 775 and AB 287 both received favorable votes after brief discussion, with members noting the importance of transparency in campaign-related reporting and accessibility for voters with disabilities. AB 331 also passed, though the Secretary of State’s office flagged implementation concerns about the proposed certification backstop and the lack of state equipment and staff to canvass ballots. The chair indicated she would continue working with the Secretary of State and other stakeholders on amendments or a workable remedy. All items ultimately passed out of committee. AB 775 was approved 5-0 and re-referred to Appropriations, AB 287 passed 6-0, and AB 331 passed 6-0 and was re-referred to Public Safety. The committee also later confirmed the votes of absent members and adjourned after all agenda items were disposed of.

Transcript Highlights:

• We see not only state, regional, and national attorneys that weigh in and represent their interests.
• We're only six attorneys. I'm one of those attorneys.
• I had tried more utility cases in the time that I was there than any other attorney before I took this
• Our six attorneys and our staff are going to take on this.
• They are fabulous attorneys, and my challenge so far has been to keep my people so busy that, you know

Summary: The joint committee met with a quorum present and first received an overview of its jurisdiction and duties related to appointing the Florida Public Counsel. Staff explained the committee’s authority under joint rules and state law, noted that the current Public Counsel’s term expires February 28, 2025, and that applications for the next four-year term were open with a February 6, 2025 deadline. The committee then heard an extensive update from Public Counsel Walt Truerweiler on the Office of Public Counsel’s work representing utility ratepayers before the Public Service Commission and in appeals. Truerweiler described the office’s caseload and priorities, including electric, gas, water, and wastewater rate cases; storm recovery dockets; cost-recovery clauses; rulemakings; and customer service hearings. He emphasized that the office seeks to challenge unsupported or imprudent costs, find value for customers, and use expert analysis and customer testimony to shape outcomes. He highlighted recent and ongoing matters, including major Duke, TECO, Sunshine water/wastewater, and hurricane recovery proceedings, and said the office had fully litigated four of its last five rate cases, while also achieving a major settlement in Duke that reduced a requested increase and imposed cost controls on solar projects. Members praised the office’s work and asked about the benefits of settlements, staffing and compensation, and how the office decides when to fully intervene versus provide guidance or monitor a case. Truerweiler said settlements can create predictability, reduce uncertainty and expense, and produce tangible value for both customers and utilities. He also acknowledged recruitment challenges, including lower pay than comparable agencies and difficulty attracting attorneys who do not want in-person litigation work. The committee took no substantive action beyond receiving the presentations, and adjourned after a motion was adopted.

Transcript Highlights:

• The attorney general They believe it. The attorney general believes<01:42:33.840><c> it.
• ><c> not</c><01:42:45.040><c> undefeated</c> Attorney General Brown is not undefeated Attorney General
• Democratic Attorney General's The Democratic Attorney General's Association,<01:42:52.080><c> not</c>
• The Republican<01:42:53.920><c> Attorney</c><01:42:54.239><c> General's</c> Republican Attorney General's
• </c> this bill does is it asks the attorney this bill does is it asks the attorney general's<01:47:07.440

Keywords: House streaming session for Saturday, April 11, 2026, 957, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They can appoint an attorney.
• The attorneys are only paid $75 an hour, and they're having trouble finding attorneys to do this work
• Having trouble finding attorneys to do this work for $75 an hour.
• And I think with this change, this would help correct a couple of problems, help find attorneys that
• I'm an attorney in private practice here in Jefferson City.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So it's really clear to anyone who reads it who is not an attorney.
• We want to defend a constitutional issue outside of the Attorney General's office.
• So there are times when we want to hire a high-end attorney, nothing against our current attorney general
• Right now, we can just defend our statutes by hiring an extra attorney.
• And we can't go out and hire an attorney to go on offense for our state.

Summary: The House State Affairs Committee considered three measures. RS 32824 would require paid petition signature gatherers to display on their badge not only their name but also the name of any person or entity paying them. Members discussed whether to use singular or plural wording and whether to keep “entity” in the text; a substitute motion to strike “entity” failed, and the committee then adopted the original motion with changes to use plural language. The bill was introduced. The committee also heard RS 32825C1, which would expand the Legislature’s ability to hire private counsel not just to defend state interests, but to take legal action on behalf of Idaho when federal actions are believed to exceed constitutional authority or otherwise harm the state. The sponsor said the measure would allow legislative leaders to act when the Attorney General’s office is unavailable or short-staffed, and noted it had Speaker Moyle’s support. The committee voted to introduce the bill. Finally, RS 32992, a concurrent resolution, was presented to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. The resolution highlights Idaho’s planned semiquincentennial activities, including a year of volunteerism targeting 250,000 acts of service, promotion of an Idaho song called “Forever Idaho,” a statewide signature display project, and planting “Freedom Groves” or “Liberty Groves” on public land. The committee voted to introduce the resolution and send it to the Second Reading calendar. The chair announced the committee would not meet the following Friday.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm an attorney and shareholder Stein.
• Attorneys and courts are hesitant to represent consumers due to the prohibitive attorney fees and overburdened
• ><c> over</c><00:40:59.440><c> the</c> a deputy attorney general over the a deputy attorney general over
• We want somebody like the attorney have.
• want to thank the assistant attorney want to thank the assistant attorney general.<00:49:23.200><c> Uh

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And it's administered by the Office of the Attorney General.
• Uh, and I understand we do have a resource witness from the office of the Attorney General. OK.
• Members, any questions for our resource witness from the Attorney General? All right. Thank you.
• I couldn't get that across and some others couldn't get that across to agency attorneys.
• I had the feeling that, uh, you know, it's hard to convince an attorney that that something is wrong

Transcript Highlights:

• Attorneys may attend mediation.
• Attorneys may attend scheduling.
• :22.240><c> said,</c> [clears throat] And the attorney said, [clears throat] And the attorney said, "
• The speaker said that if an attorney comes in against a self-represented party and the attorney knows
• party and an attorney self-represented party and an attorney who<01:09:57.760><c> is</c><01:09:58.320

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee on Family Court reviewed several previously distributed reports, including a comparison of family court structures in other states and a report on improving New Hampshire family court pre-trial and mediation practices. The main new topic was a report on the intersection of domestic violence and family courts in New Hampshire, with members discussing how domestic violence cases in superior or district court can overlap with custody matters in family court and how courts may not be aware of related proceedings in other venues. Members discussed RSA 490-D:2 and related statutes, noting that family courts have original jurisdiction over certain abuse, neglect, and domestic violence matters, with concurrent jurisdiction in some protective-order cases. The discussion focused on practical problems such as confidentiality in domestic violence cases, limited access to case information by nonparties, and the need for courts to better communicate about companion cases. Suggestions included a shared or unified database, expanded lethality assessments for law enforcement, and a requirement that criminal courts report domestic violence convictions or protective-order violations to family court so judges are aware of the full case context. The subcommittee also discussed ways to help self-represented litigants, including better education at first appearance, clearer guidance about raising protective orders or criminal charges at hearings, daily docket review by clerks, and a possible “lawyer for the day” program modeled on Massachusetts. One member raised the idea of a family safety docket, while another noted that New Hampshire already has a complex case docket for high-conflict matters and that cases generally stay with one judge when possible. No votes were taken, and the chair said the subcommittee would continue reviewing materials and could return to work next year, with possible bill amendments to follow.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm a physician, attorney, an original care petitioner. Thank you.
• I'm a physician, attorney, an original Care petitioner. Thank you.
• The UCL allows the Attorney General, district attorneys, public attorneys, and affected individuals to
• The Attorney General does have a consumer protection division.
• They have their own attorney that is assigned throughout the process.

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills, beginning with SB 16, which would require county behavioral health directors to create clear pathways for clinicians to be authorized to initiate 5150 involuntary holds. The author and supporters argued the bill would reduce reliance on law enforcement and create more consistent crisis response standards statewide, while county behavioral health directors opposed it as an unfunded mandate that could increase law enforcement involvement and create implementation burdens. Members raised questions about county costs and funding, but the author emphasized the bill’s role in building a more clinical response system. SB 561 would require public guardians to acknowledge conservatorship referrals, make determinations within a reasonable time, and provide status updates on request. Supporters said the bill would reduce delays that leave vulnerable adults in limbo, while the opposition from public guardian representatives was removed after amendments. SB 381 drew extensive public testimony in support; it would allow California-born adoptees, and descendants of deceased adoptees, access to original birth certificates, with a nonbinding contact preference form for birth parents. Supporters framed the bill as a matter of dignity, identity, and health, and there was no formal opposition on the record. The committee also discussed SB 880, which would give tenants and prospective owner-occupants notice and a first opportunity to make an offer when institutional investors sell certain homes. Supporters said it would expand homeownership opportunities and preserve neighborhood stability, while opponents warned about conflicts with federal law, bundled-sale restrictions, and impacts on build-to-rent and affordable housing projects. Members and the author discussed possible amendments to address those concerns. SB 1238 would impose a duty of care and additional transparency requirements on HOA managers and boards; supporters said it would protect homeowners from mismanagement, while the main opposition argued the duty should remain contractual and could increase litigation. Finally, SB 423 would require disclosure of emergency-service records related to private detention facilities, and SB 28 would make changes to the CARE Court process, including a statewide ombudsperson and expanded oversight; both drew support and opposition, with concerns focused on transparency, privacy, implementation, and the balance between treatment and coercion. SB 574, discussed at the end, would require disclosure and human oversight for AI use in courts and legal practice and create a complaint process for ADR providers, with the State Bar noting requested amendments related to complaint handling and confidentiality.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:23:21.600><c> general's</c><00:23:22.080><c> office</c><00:23:22.480><c> has</c> the attorney
• ,</c><01:06:08.319><c> um</c> department and um and the attorneys, um department and um and the attorneys
• The school's reply was that the attorneys felt a sense of urgency and they needed to move forward.
• I spoke with the OS attorneys, and their solution is in front of you now.
• </c> even an attorney. even an attorney. &gt;&gt; Okay. Thank<01:37:08.080><c> you.</c> Thank you.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The language is done by our wonderful attorneys and then is to be approved by the joint committees on
• One thing that I could not find, and I asked the attorneys, is there anything that dictates the order
• So for our attorney, does that mean that, you know, can't prohibit it, can't stop it?
• So, Madam Chair, back to the attorney, if I may, and as I understand it, if it says Article 1 Bill of
• Madam Attorney. So in the second paragraph. Your mic. You're mic. Madam, excuse me.

Keywords: House Committee Room C, General Assembly Building, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair calls on the rules attorney. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• Chair calls on the rules attorney. Mr.
• Any questions for the rules attorney? Any comments?
• Chair calls on the rules attorney. Mr.
• Any questions for the rules attorney? Any comments or discussion?

Summary: The Rules Committee considered several bills for constitutional and proper-form review, with the chair holding House Bill 2555. The committee heard legal analysis on House Bill 2060, which would prohibit public educational institutions and universities from encouraging or facilitating abortions; counsel flagged possible state constitutional issues in light of Proposition 139, but the committee still recommended the bill 5-3. House Bill 2085, dealing with gender transition procedures and referrals, was discussed at length for possible First Amendment concerns, especially around provider referrals, but it was also recommended 5-3. House Bill 2133, requiring age and consent verification for online sexual material, was flagged for possible federal preemption under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and was recommended 5-3. House Bill 2086, which would bar government entities from requiring masks or vaccinations, raised Supremacy Clause and intergovernmental immunity concerns because it included the federal government, but the sponsor was said to be working on an amendment; it passed 5-3. House Bill 2279, concerning liability and waivers for Grand Canyon river outfitters, drew an anti-abrogation clause concern, with staff saying ordinary negligence liability must remain available; it was also recommended 5-3. House Bill 2364, adding criminal penalties for mailing or delivering abortion-inducing drugs, was flagged as likely conflicting with the new abortion-rights language in Proposition 139, though staff said the courts were still sorting out the issue; it too passed 5-3. The committee then took up a large mass motion covering many additional bills, resolutions, and memorials. Staff noted one update on House Concurrent Resolution 2003, which would place on the ballot changes affecting school sports participation based on biological sex; they said the U.S. Supreme Court was considering similar laws from Idaho and West Virginia and that the outcome could affect the measure. No other specific concerns were raised on the mass motion items, and the committee recommended all of them 8-0. Throughout the meeting, members asked clarifying questions about the constitutional issues, including the effect of Proposition 139, the scope of First Amendment protections for medical providers, federal preemption, and the anti-abrogation clause. Several members voted no on the abortion- and gender-related bills, while the majority consistently voted to advance the measures as constitutional and in proper form. The meeting adjourned after the mass motion vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair calls the Rules attorney.
• Chair calls on the Rules attorney. Mr.
• Any questions for the rules attorney? Any comments?
• Chair calls on the rules attorney. Mr.
• Any questions for the rules attorney? Any comments or discussion?

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So today, the district attorneys are responsible for providing counsel for these entities.
• A lot of times, the district attorney will, you know, if they're busy with like a criminal case or you
• I think it is just you know there there's people that have attorneys that have special you know they
• Representative, would you agree that your bill is solely geared Toward assisting district attorneys by
• I know you're an attorney, and so you probably have the right perspective.

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> had with um a uh Attorney General J.R. had with um a uh Attorney General J.R.
• </c> sophisticated attorney general approved sophisticated attorney general approved subdivision<00:37
• I'm an assistant attorney general with the Consumer Protection Bureau of the Department of Justice, Attorney
• It with the attorney general's office.
• Hey, there may be developers attorneys.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first held a public hearing on Senate Bill 25, which would allow state-chartered credit unions to compensate board members if the membership approves it. Prime sponsor Senator Dan Innis said the bill is enabling only, intended to help credit unions recruit and retain qualified directors and align New Hampshire with other states that already allow such compensation. Credit union representatives from the Cooperative Credit Union Association and St. Mary’s Bank supported the bill, saying board service has become more complex because of cybersecurity, asset-liability management, and other regulatory demands, and that compensation could be modest and take forms such as meeting fees or educational reimbursement. In response to committee questions, they said compensation would be set by the membership, disclosed in advance, and subject to bylaws and internal policies; they also noted that board members must be credit union members and that voting procedures vary by institution, with some using mailed ballots rather than proxy voting. Members raised questions about why credit union boards were historically excluded, what kinds of compensation were contemplated, whether there would be a cap, and how voting and confidentiality would work. Testimony explained that the historical rationale was the nonprofit, volunteer mission of credit unions, but witnesses argued that the modern environment and competition for talent justify a change. They also said the bill would not mandate compensation and would not create a salary structure comparable to banks, but would allow members to approve modest compensation or reimbursements. After no further testimony, the chair closed the public hearing on Senate Bill 25. The committee then opened a public hearing on Senate Bill 26, sponsored by Senator Howard Pearl, concerning the definition of deposits in land sales and escrowed accounts. Pearl said the bill would clarify that buyer funds for upgrades and luxury items in new-home construction are not treated as refundable deposits that must be held in escrow, arguing that the current Attorney General interpretation raises builder costs, increases home prices, and can limit buyer choices. He said the proposal would allow those upgrade funds to be paid directly to builders for construction, with signed disclosures making clear that the buyer requested the items and bears the risk if financing falls through. The hearing on Senate Bill 26 had just begun when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Dig in a little deeper to how it's connected to the district attorney.
• Senator McMath, I keep hearing you go back and forth between Inspector General and Attorney General.
• Is that a— Not Attorney General. Okay. Not Attorney General. Okay. Okay. All right.
• District Attorney. Okay, all right. All right. Thank you.
• District attorney. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Okay, the board is clear.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Summary: The House Municipal, Parochial, and Cultural Affairs Committee heard and advanced a series of local and statewide measures. SB 430 would renew, every 12 years by voter approval, the Shreveport-Bossier hotel occupancy tax that supports tourism and sports-related entities; SB 286 updates the New Orleans Downtown Development District statute by clarifying its status as a political subdivision, streamlining tax collection, removing staggered board terms, and clarifying bond-election boundaries; SB 198 requires government projects in historic districts to follow local historic district guidelines for new construction; and SB 172 expands a planning-commission provision so smaller municipalities can waive certain subdivision formalities and costly studies in limited family land-split situations. Each of these bills was described as largely technical or permissive, with supporters emphasizing efficiency, local control, or reduced costs. The committee also advanced SB 439 to add pre-screening for esophageal/Barrett’s esophageal cancer for firefighters and fire service employees, with firefighters’ representatives explaining the test can detect pre-cancerous cells and prevent later, more serious cancer. SB 458 would allow a local tax for a proposed St. Tammany Parish Inspector General/ethics entity to be allocated and, if excess remains, transferred to the district attorney’s office; members discussed the parish-wide referendum process and the connection to state-required funding obligations. SB 447 changes Bossier City Police Department promotional seniority and civil service classification from competitive seniority to promotional seniority, and SB 281 expands the Baker Economic Development District boundary to include additional commercial areas near the airport and support blight removal and growth. Additional measures moved favorably included SB 385, which changes appointments to the New Orleans City Park Improvement Association board and allows City Park to opt out of certain state insurance coverage because it carries private insurance; HR 84, which urges Shreveport to create an interest-free loan program for TSA agents at the regional airport during federal shutdowns; and SB 417, which adds two members to the St. Mary Parish Consolidated Gravity Drainage District No. 2A board. In each case, the committee heard brief testimony from sponsors and local officials or advocates, asked clarifying questions, and then approved the bills without objection. One member, Representative Murray, recused himself from the City Park bill because of his board membership. The committee then took a short recess, noting a few remaining bills would be deferred if sponsors did not appear.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the manager of the Consumer Protection Division at the Attorney General's Office.
• The Attorney General's Office administers the Consumer Protection Restitution Account.
• And so, uh, just as an example,<00:03:11.840><c> the</c><00:03:12.159><c> attorney</c><00:03:12.560><
• c> general's</c><00:03:12.959><c> office,</c> example, the attorney general's office, example, the attorney
• </c> this new structure helps uh the attorney this new structure helps uh the attorney general's<00:08

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee heard House File 4867, a bill from Representative Lee to make changes to the Consumer Protection Restitution Account created the prior year to help victims of fraud. The Attorney General’s Office testified that the fund has already received more than $4.5 million and is beginning its first distributions, including payments to victims of the closure of Woodbury Dental. The office said the bill would remove the current $5 million annual deposit cap and establish a more equitable distribution formula so large claims would not exhaust the fund and prevent other victims from receiving restitution. Public testimony strongly supported the bill. A Woodbury Dental victim described paying $25,000 upfront, losing her dental work when the clinic abruptly closed, and having to start over with another dentist; she said reimbursement would help her recover from the loss. An AARP Minnesota representative also supported the measure as a cleanup bill that improves the new restitution program. Members asked about how the bill would handle large claims, whether the Attorney General could still pursue defendants for additional recovery, and whether restitution payments would be taxable. The Attorney General’s Office said it would continue collection efforts and reimburse the fund if later recoveries are made, and Representative Lee said the bill includes a provision making payments non-taxable. The chair then moved that House File 4867 be laid over, and the bill was laid over without a vote on passage.

Transcript Highlights:

• Fund to the Attorney General's Revolving Fund.
• We do those every year out of the Attorney General's budget.
• And I imagine this was kept pretty flat, the $26 million as it relates to the Attorney General.
• Necessary to perform the duties imposed upon the office of the Attorney General by law.
• Because we send a lot of things over to the Attorney General, so how was that calculated?

Bills: SB1177

Keywords: education funding, mental health services, public safety, housing, state budget, 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So today the district attorneys are responsible for providing counsel for these entities.
• A lot of times the district attorney will, you know, if they're busy with a criminal case or, you know
• I think it is just, you know, there are attorneys that have special interests.
• Representative, would you agree that your bill is solely geared toward assisting district attorneys by
• I know you're an attorney, and so you probably have the right perspective.

Bills: HB3015, HB3114, HB3411, HB3567, HB3568, HB3749, HB3891, HB4229, HB4237, HB4253, HJR1019, HJR1046, HJR1084

Keywords: electronic credentials, Service Oklahoma, digital identification, data protection, driver's license, electronic monitoring, criminal justice reform, nonviolent offenders, Department of Corrections, parole, state law, biosolids, PFAS, environmental safety, agriculture, public health, Department of Environmental Quality, testing regulations, soil amendments, HB3567

Summary: The committee first announced that House Bills 3568 and 3891 and H.J.R. 1019 would be laid over and not heard that day. It then took up a series of bills, adopting PCS versions where offered and generally moving them forward with do-pass recommendations. House Bill 3015 would allow Oklahomans to add a driver’s license to a digital wallet and use it as an optional credential; members questioned why legislation was needed now versus the 2019 digital ID effort and whether the state would work directly with Apple and Google rather than a third-party vendor. The bill passed 10-0. Other measures included House Bill 314, which adds a DOC electronic monitoring ineligibility item; House Bill 3567, which increases transparency in campaign fund use and was amended to correct a citation; House Bill 3749, which lets county clerks, county court clerks, and county commissioners retain outside counsel; House Bill 4229, which narrows when schools may declare emergencies for contracts when facilities are unusable; and House Bill 4237, which modernizes collection of criminal court fees, fines, and costs. Each of these bills advanced, with HB 3749 drawing the most discussion over whether it duplicates district attorney services and whether county commissioners would be approving their own outside-counsel contracts. The committee also advanced House Bill 4253, a union-related bill that the author said he was carrying as a vehicle and would substantially revise before final passage; members discussed federal labor-law concerns and the bill passed 10-0. House Joint Resolution 1046 would exempt homeowners from property tax for a year if a residence is uninhabitable for six months after a disaster; members debated the impact on local tax bases and whether existing ad valorem refund mechanisms should be used instead, and it passed 10-0. House Joint Resolution 1084, which states that Oklahoma and U.S. constitutional standards govern courtroom matters and no court should enforce incompatible religious law, passed 8-2 after questions about whether it addressed a current problem. Finally, House Bill 3411 on biosolids and PFAS testing would require DEQ testing and disclosure to landowners and authorize treatment protocols; it passed 9-1. The meeting ended with notice that the next rules meeting was moved to Thursday at 11:30 in a different room due to technical difficulties.