Transcript Highlights:

• The chair then asked the author to close, and the author responded by saying she wanted to address a
• The author said no.
• Item 3, AB 1627 was pulled by the author. Item 4. AB 1627 was pulled by the author.
• I just wanted to second it and thank the author, and I'd love to be added as a co-author.
• Item 31, AB 2669 was pulled by the author. Item 31, AB 2669, was pulled by the author.

Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of public safety bills, with several measures pulled off calendar and one consent calendar adopted. AB 2419 by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva would extend body-worn cameras to Los Angeles County juvenile probation officers. Supporters said cameras would improve accountability, youth and officer safety, and public trust; opponents argued the bill would not solve deeper problems in juvenile halls and raised concerns about officer discretion, privacy, and labor issues. The bill passed to Appropriations on a roll call vote. AB 1902 by Assembly Member Pellerin, co-sponsored by Santa Cruz County, would revise the juvenile detention extension hearing process in response to the Madison Middleton case. Supporters, including the victim’s mother and county officials, said the bill would clarify jurisdiction, allow continuances, permit hearsay at the probable cause stage, extend the maximum detention period, and better protect the public and victims from repeated trauma. Opponents from public defender, youth justice, and civil liberties groups argued the bill expands civil commitment, reduces review frequency, and could lead to inappropriate adult placement. The committee approved the bill to Appropriations, with some members noting remaining concerns. AB 2052 by Assembly Member Stephanie would allow continuity in prosecution for elder and dependent adult abuse cases, including a limited continuance so the same prosecutor can stay with a case. Supporters said older victims and those with dementia or other impairments benefit from a single point of contact and less repeated trauma; opponents said the bill could undermine speedy-trial rights and was broader than necessary. The bill passed to Judiciary. AB 1588, also by Assembly Member Stephanie, would strengthen sideshow and street takeover enforcement by adding motorcycles and dirt bikes to the law and increasing penalties. Supporters framed it as a public safety and accountability measure, while opponents warned it would expand punishment, surveillance, and fines without addressing root causes; the bill was sent to Transportation on a roll call vote. AB 1753, another Stephanie bill, would tighten firearm relinquishment and protective-order enforcement, expand remote hearing access, and align firearm prohibitions across protective order categories; it passed to Judiciary. The committee also heard AB 1739 by Assembly Member Ward, which would criminalize clergy sexual exploitation when clergy provide therapeutic services, with survivors and advocates testifying in support.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, education finance co-chair Krisha and I have recently sent a letter to federal immigration authorities
• authorities stating just these<00:05:08.000><c> things.
• Guarding bus stops, giving rides to school, standing watch on playgrounds.
• ><c> rides</c><00:46:06.560><c> to</c> Guarding bus stops, giving rides to Guarding bus stops, giving
• But let me be clear: school district employees are authorized to be in and work in the United States.

Bills: HF3435, HF3409

Keywords: school access, school site, school district, charter school, federal agents, DHS, Department of Homeland Security, ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CBP, Customs and Border Protection, USCIS, immigration enforcement, judicial warrant, student privacy, school safety, sanctuary schools, warrant requirement, federal warrant, school grounds

Transcript Highlights:

• costs across our programs and, if needed, for everybody to be able to access that additional levy authority
• and</c><00:20:39.280><c> thank</c><00:20:39.440><c> you</c><00:20:39.600><c> superintendent</c> Authority
• and thank you superintendent Authority and thank you superintendent Carrie<00:20:40.640><c> for</c><
• :54:21.920><c> put</c> government is the the uh we maybe put government is the the uh we maybe put guard
• rails on too tight especially guard rails on too tight especially around<00:54:24.000><c> schools</c

Bills: HF827, HF1258, HF2387, HF2388, HF2534, HF2016

Keywords: education, school funding, consolidation aid, financial support, Minnesota Statutes, education finance, ice arena, school districts, cooperation agreement, equal sports opportunities, school milk program, nutrition, food waste, kindergarten, public schools, supplemental revenue, charter schools, funding, state appropriations, general education funding

Transcript Highlights:

• talking about this unfriendly amendment last week, one of the things that seemed clear was that the authors
• That does not mean that we should not be guarding against it.
• So I'm not advocating in any way, shape, or form that we should not be guarding against these types of
• So again, there was not a major difference in quality of care that the authors could point to over this

Bills: HB99, HB49, HB164, SB30, SB43, SB50, SB136

Keywords: medical malpractice, malpractice reform, patient's compensation fund, PCF, health care liability, tort reform, damage caps, punitive damages, hospital liability, physician liability, nurse practitioner, certified nurse-midwife, outpatient facility, ambulatory surgical center, urgent care, free-standing emergency room, insurance surcharge, superintendent of insurance, New Mexico hospitals, medical review process

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, as a note to our testifiers and authors and guests, we have a full agenda.
• </c><00:01:51.680><c> would</c> uh in the manner that the author would uh in the manner that the author
• </c><00:03:51.040><c> soldier</c> and became a national guard soldier and became a national guard soldier
• </c> manner that the amendment the author manner that the amendment the author wants.<00:29:59.679><c
• </c><01:29:56.960><c> this</c> thank Chair Kaggel for authorizing this thank Chair Kaggel for authorizing

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I know that's not what the author and the testifiers are aiming at; we just would want to avoid that
• </c> don't think that that's what the author don't think that that's what the author and<00:13:07.360
• The legislature passed sweeping reform on Minnesota Statute 609.66, which authorizes deadly force for
• </c> reviewed as it relates to uh authorized reviewed as it relates to uh authorized use<00:36:32.720
• She said the A2 amendment brings in House File 294, authored by Representative Hansen, to incorporate

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think what we have to guard against is adulterated product, which is quite common, apparently.
• And I think what we have to guard against is adulterated product, which is quite common, apparently.

Summary: The working group met for a legislative-only discussion on kratom ahead of a special session, with members first hearing a staff memo summarizing federal and state regulation, kratom’s psychoactive effects, reported health risks, and North Dakota’s recent executive action and special session call. The chair explained that legislators in the room would speak first, then online participants, with comments limited to about five to seven minutes, and noted a public open house and later expert testimony would follow. Several legislators argued the issue had already been extensively debated in the 2025 session, citing House Bill 1101, which would have scheduled kratom as a Schedule I substance and was defeated, and House Bill 1566, which evolved into a study. They urged the group to consider both prohibition and regulation, and some suggested a temporary measure until the 2027 session. Others emphasized testimony from people who say natural kratom helps with chronic pain or PTSD and warned against banning a product that some use to function, while still supporting tighter controls on adulterated or synthetic products. Other members focused on public health and enforcement concerns. Some said the executive order created confusion for users, retailers, and law enforcement, and raised concerns about withdrawal, access to treatment such as Suboxone, and whether the state could regulate the product effectively in the short time available. A pharmacology-focused discussion distinguished natural kratom leaf from synthetic 7-OH products, with several members saying the synthetic forms pose the greatest overdose risk and should be tightly restricted or scheduled, while any legal natural product would need strict limits, labeling, and penalties. The meeting ended without a vote, with the chair saying the group would continue gathering testimony and return for further hearings next week and during the special session.

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, National Guard as an example.”
• “The National Guard, as an example, is called out for something and keeping those troops on salary for

Summary: The Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review held an informational hearing on ACA 20, the Save for California’s Future Act, and took no votes. The chair described the measure as a way to strengthen the state’s Rainy Day Fund by increasing reserves during strong revenue years and helping pay down long-term obligations. The vice chair said he preferred a broader spending rule tied to a rolling average of revenues, rather than the proposal’s reserve-focused approach. The Legislative Analyst’s Office explained how Proposition 2 currently requires deposits into the Budget Stabilization Account and debt payments when revenues are strong, and how ACA 20 would change those rules by increasing required reserve deposits, raising the BSA target from 10% to 20% of General Fund revenues, creating a “super excess capital gains” deposit requirement, extending debt-payment requirements through 2040, and expanding eligible debt uses to include Proposition 98 settle-up, budgetary borrowing, and federal unemployment insurance debt. The Department of Finance said the administration supports the measure and believes it improves Proposition 2. Members asked about the Gann limit, whether the measure would allow more spending or simply change how deposits are counted, the impact on infrastructure and other programs, the size of the UI debt, and how the proposal would affect future budget flexibility. Several senators supported the goal of saving more in good years and using reserves to avoid painful cuts in downturns, while others questioned whether the proposal was sufficiently simple or whether a larger structural spending rule would be better. Public comment largely supported the measure, with one former legislative staffer arguing it follows earlier reserve reforms and helps address the state’s UI debt. The chair closed by noting the committee would not act that day and that the measure would be considered on the Senate floor the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I could not stop, because the guards pushed his gun beside my head.
• Campuses have asked us for extended funding for events, security guards in place, particularly for events

Transcript Highlights:

• some of these, especially out west where the trails are a lot more rugged compared to on the East Coast
• As such, we give stewardship authority to ecologists, foresters, biologists of DCR, and MassWildlife.
• I've been a lead author of five Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports and, at the state of
• Massachusetts level, I was a co-author of the 2009 Massachusetts Forest Future Visioning Process and
• biodiversity and ecosystem services at a global scale depends on effective and equitable... lead author

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The hearing covered several environment and natural resources bills focused on natural and working lands, forest protection, municipal reforestation, trail accessibility, and a park naming bill. Representative Moschino and Senator Comerford described the natural and working lands bill as part of the state’s climate roadmap, arguing that protecting these lands supports carbon sequestration, resilience, biodiversity, and helps prevent development pressure on the least expensive land. Senator Comerford also testified on a separate bill to expand access to trails for people of all abilities, saying it would build on the administration’s Trails for All initiative and create a permanent advisory structure and trust fund. Representative Consolvo and family members testified in support of H. 4259 to name the tennis courts at Wether Park in Roslindale after Kim O’Connell, describing her long community service and activism. A large portion of the hearing focused on H. 952 and H. 953, bills to protect watershed and state forest lands as parks or reserves. Supporters, including environmental advocates, scientists, and organizations such as Standing Trees, Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy, and the Massachusetts Forest Alliance’s opponents, debated whether state forests and watershed lands should be permanently reserved from logging and other active management. Supporters said the bills would improve carbon storage, water quality, biodiversity, flood and drought resilience, and would protect large acreages of public land at no cost. Opponents, including the Massachusetts Forest Alliance, argued that sustainable forest management and a mix of reserves and managed forests are needed for climate, water quality, wildfire prevention, rural jobs, and carbon outcomes, and urged the committee to allow the administration’s existing reserve process to continue. The committee also heard extensive testimony on the municipal reforestation bill, H. 1013/S. 553, which would create a statewide program, advisory council, and trust fund to support urban tree planting and maintenance. Municipal officials and advocates from Wellesley, Cambridge, Boston, the Mystic River watershed, and other communities said urban trees are critical for cooling, stormwater control, air quality, public health, and equity, especially in environmental justice neighborhoods with low canopy cover and high heat. Several witnesses emphasized that consistent funding is needed because trees take years to mature and many municipalities lack staff or watering capacity. Some witnesses asked that the bill be funded at $100 million and tied to the Mass Ready Act or environmental bond funding. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:05:12.520><c> in</c> Portsmith Development Authority in Portsmith Development Authority in writing
• I’m Paul Breen, the executive director of the Pease Development Authority.
• It's nice to hear from someone from the authority.
• The one we heard today, Peace Development Authority.
• </c><01:59:03.280><c> yeah</c> today peace Development Authority yeah today peace Development Authority

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This subsection G deals with a person of authority.
• So if the person person of authority.
• </c><00:27:15.120><c> in</c> who occupies a position of authority in who occupies a position of authority
• She used her position of authority to build a secretive, sexualized relationship.
• </c> um for the position of authority um for the position of authority penalties. penalties. penalties

Bills: HB0008, HB0009, HB0028

Keywords: stalking, minors, felony, protection orders, criminal penalties, grooming, sexual offenses, child protection, sexual exploitation, law amendment, explicit conduct, sex crimes, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> carry out those delegated authorities. carry out those delegated authorities.
• </c> in the form that the author would like. in the form that the author would like.
• </c><01:34:06.960><c> not</c> authorities are broad and not authorities are broad and not specific,<01
• </c> the bill gives the MPC a new authority the bill gives the MPC a new authority um<01:37:33.840><c
• </c> requested where the statutory authority requested where the statutory authority was.<01:37:41.280

Bills: HF1587, HF2293, HF2218, HF1208, HF1482

Keywords: HF1587, Cass County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, DNR, condemnation, eminent domain, state land, surplus land, public waters, tribal land transfer, federally recognized Indian Tribe, tribal ownership, land conveyance, no consideration, land appropriation, natural resources, U.S. Highway 2, Section 27 Township 145 North Range 28 West, land return, Tribal sovereignty

Transcript Highlights:

• One of the lone exceptions I know is the Sabine River Authority, which has its own authority managing
• I do believe that the Sabine River Authority has its own independent authority in Title 38, so I don't
• Texas SRA, well, Sabine River Authority sales there, Well, Sabine River Authority sells their same water
• Can you describe that authority?
• Can you describe that authority?

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1209, which would pause new cooperative endeavor agreements for surface water withdrawals after December 31, 2026, while allowing existing agreements to continue and renew through 2036. The author said the bill is intended to force a broader, data-driven review of Louisiana’s surface water management and to improve funding for aquatic plant control, especially giant salvinia. An amendment was adopted to broaden the description of how the aquatic plant control fund may be used and to require annual reporting on agreements, withdrawals, revenues, deposits, spending, and non-monetary consideration. Department officials said the current program is voluntary, underfunded for monitoring, and that the bill could create a gap for new users if no replacement mechanism is enacted. The bill was reported favorable as amended after testimony from supporters including the Louisiana Wildlife Federation and opposition concerns from industry representatives were noted but not formally presented. House Bill 599 was then heard, which would prohibit the sale of Louisiana running surface water outside the state. The author argued that out-of-state sales, especially involving Toledo Bend and Texas, would be short-sighted and could harm Louisiana’s long-term water interests. Supporters said Louisiana lacks a water budget and should preserve water for in-state needs, while the Department of Conservation and Energy noted that the state currently has no mandatory process for such agreements and that the bill would not affect Sabine River Authority authority. The committee reported the bill favorable. Finally, House Bill 1206, dealing with permitting and reporting of water usage at data centers, was discussed. The substitute bill and amendment would give the department authority to monitor and regulate groundwater and surface water withdrawals, require public hearings, and improve transparency through reporting and a universal project identifier. The author and supporters said the bill was prompted by concerns in communities affected by large data center projects and the lack of public hearings on water use. Department officials agreed that more comprehensive data and a clearer framework are needed, but the author voluntarily deferred the bill to continue working with the department on a broader measure for next session. The committee also heard House Bill 1171 on allowing airboats in the Mar-Paw Swamp Wildlife Management Area, but after extensive debate over noise, habitat impacts, and existing restrictions, the discussion was ongoing in the portion provided and no final action on that bill was shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• And let me lead by saying, I have so much respect for the author.
• As a proud joint author, I support this bill.
• Author. I support this bill.
• Just a quick question for the author. Without objection? Yes.
• I want to thank the author.

Summary: The Assembly convened, established a quorum, and proceeded through a large House of Origin floor file, with the Speaker repeatedly urging members to be at their desks and keep support bills brief. Early actions included dispensing with the journal, re-referring AB 2285 to the Banking and Finance Committee, and then taking up dozens of third-reading items, with many bills passed by voice or recorded vote and others passed temporarily or retained on file. The floor debated and passed a wide range of measures on land use, housing, labor, public safety, health care, utilities, taxation, and consumer protection. Among the bills approved were measures on land surveyor review (AB 1933), nurse midwife access for pregnant and postpartum patients (AB 1696), historic-district transit zoning flexibility (AB 2415), EV charging infrastructure fees and timelines (AB 1820), foreclosure bidding protections (AB 1957), tribal cannabis commerce (AB 2506), outdoor advertising permitting (AB 2024), commercial building permit timelines and third-party plan checkers (AB 2418), DUI penalties (AB 1685 and AB 1687), utility rate transparency (AB 1715), CalWORKs work-penalty changes (AB 1755), dynamic electricity rates (AB 1787), interior designer licensure (AB 1796), compost labeling and contamination rules (AB 1812), modular housing standardization (AB 1815), small claims limits for businesses (AB 1827), Native American Day as a paid state holiday (AB 1841), hospital staffing and maternity access bills (AB 1868 and AB 1882), protective orders tied to release dates (AB 1889), and a series of public health, missing persons, and teacher credentialing measures later in the file. Several high-profile bills drew extended debate. AB 2624, expanding Safe at Home privacy protections to immigrant service providers, prompted sharp disagreement over free speech and alleged limits on online posting, but supporters said it protected workers facing threats and doxing; it ultimately passed 49-19. AB 2023, creating a framework for regulating AI chatbots used by children, was framed as a child-safety measure after testimony about chatbot-related harms and suicide risks, and passed 58-8. Other notable votes included AB 2208 on Medi-Cal protections against federal cuts, AB 2299 on CalFresh/SNAP losses, AB 2115 apologizing to California Native peoples for historic state harms, and AB 2311 on public hospital physician employment; the transcript ends as the Assembly continues working through the remaining file.

Transcript Highlights:

• Its statutory authority can be found in Chapter 57, Title 67 of Idaho Code.
• The department is currently authorized 137 FTP, and over the last five years it has filled 92% of its
• authorization.
• That active authorization had been expended at the time of the division's status report.
• The Idaho National Guard has approval for a readiness center project in 2029.

Summary: The Senate Finance and House Appropriations Committee heard budget presentations for the Department of Administration and the Permanent Building Fund. For the Department of Administration, analysts reviewed the agency’s dedicated-fund-heavy budget, recent staffing and utility adjustments, and FY 2027 requests including three new Medicaid procurement positions, a utilities shift from general fund to dedicated funds, and IT replacement items. Members questioned rising utility costs, office-space utilization, vacant buildings at the Chinden campus and 954 Jefferson, and whether the department was holding vacancies or reducing services. Director Steve Bailey said the department is trying to reduce general fund reliance, consolidate space, repurpose positions, and improve efficiency through digital tools; he also said the department is not intentionally holding vacancies and is actively filling needed positions. A major discussion focused on Medicaid procurement and the transition to managed care. Bailey said the requested procurement staff are needed to handle a large, complex solicitation and ongoing contract management, with legal and federal requirements and an Attorney General attorney assigned to assist. Senators asked about Deloitte’s role, other states’ procurement practices, and why the Department of Administration rather than Medicaid would run the process. Bailey explained that Medicaid provides program expertise while Purchasing runs the procurement. The committee also discussed the MMIS procurement, where Bailey said a court stay is delaying implementation after a second-place vendor challenged the process; he said that delay will also push back the broader MCO rollout. Another topic was the Office of Group Insurance’s decision to drop GLP-1 coverage for weight loss, which Bailey said was driven by rapid cost growth from an initial estimate of about $10,000 annually to roughly $15 million in 2025 and more than $30 million over three years. The committee then heard the Permanent Building Fund budget. Analysts explained the fund’s revenue sources, the multi-year nature of capital projects, and the large deferred maintenance program funded in prior years. They noted a proposed FY 2027 transfer of $33.7 million in canceled project balances to the general fund and a possible one-time redirection of interest earnings to the general fund. The Division of Public Works reported 595 active projects, with most FY 2025 projects under construction, in design, or complete, and said 91% of the $544 million deferred maintenance program is active. Members asked about specific canceled projects, including the North Idaho reentry center, the Carnegie Library purchase, the ISU/INL pedestrian crossing, and the Idaho State Police facility in Lewiston; staff said some are unlikely to return soon, while others may come back once land or a site is secured. The committee also discussed inspection practices, with Public Works saying field representatives and third-party testing serve different oversight functions. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the committee adjourned after announcing the next day’s agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:24:37.840><c> investigate</c> author with um authority to investigate author with um authority
• :24:48.320><c> tools</c><00:24:48.720><c> to</c> authority with investigative tools to authority with
• Um the the amendment that authority.
• </c><01:14:11.840><c> Um</c> share investigative authority. Um share investigative authority.
• So even if that authority to do.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, let's give our respectful attention to the authors.
• And let me lead by saying, I have so much respect for the author.
• As a proud joint author, I support this bill.
• Just a quick question for the author. Without objection? Yes.
• Question to the author? Without objection. What's the title of origin?

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• How do we get the National Guard to come out and, you know, help us?
• And whenever the state came in and he was a very responsible person, he was authorized to drive a school
• President and Madam Chair, Authorized to drive a school bus, Mr.
• President, Senator, through a program from the Mortgage Finance Authority.
• President, Senator, it's a normal program and process that housing finance authorities can do this, and

Bills: SB273, SB37, SB100

Keywords: SB273, appropriations, general fund, hold harmless, local government finance, municipal revenue, county revenue, correctional facility, jail contract, private prison, detention facility, immigration detention, revenue bonds, clawback, child welfare, juvenile justice, protective services, school improvement, New MexiCare, aging services

Summary: The Senate convened on the 30th day of the 2026 session, established a quorum, heard an invocation from Chaplain Harry Eberts, and received several announcements and House messages. The chamber then took up multiple concurrence and third-reading items, including Senate Bill 273, Senate Bill 37, Senate Bill 100, Senate Bill 41, House Bill 34, House Bill 20, House Bill 43, House Bill 38, and House Bill 256. The body also heard that House Joint Memorial 2 was moved from the President’s table to the calendar, and later received messages from the House on several other Senate and House measures. The most contentious action was concurrence on Senate Bill 273, which concerns correction facility loss of revenue for counties affected by the loss of ICE detainees. Senators debated the economic impact on Torrance, Otero, and Cibola counties, with supporters arguing the bill provided partial relief and critics saying it did not come close to replacing lost jobs and revenue. The Senate ultimately concurred with the House amendments by a vote of 22-18. On Senate Bill 100, which would have expanded burglary-related definitions to include an “extension of a dwelling,” several senators argued the House language was too broad and legally vague, and the Senate voted not to concur, sending the bill back to the House. Senate Bill 41, with a technical correction and addition of second-degree criminal sexual penetration, was concurred with by voice vote. Among the bills passed on third reading, House Bill 34 updated school nurse licensure rules and supervision pathways and passed 38-0. House Bill 43, a PERA cleanup bill, clarified retirement and survivor-benefit provisions, and passed 39-0 after questions about whether it affected PERA’s unfunded liability; sponsors said it did not. House Bill 38 expanded insurance coverage for powered mobility devices and prosthetics, including coverage for batteries and in-state provider requirements, and passed 38-0. House Bill 256 expanded cardiac emergency response planning and AED requirements to athletic activities and schools, including private schools on a phased-in basis, and was debated over cost and scope before passing. House Bill 20, which would allow Native American designation on driver’s licenses and IDs, prompted extended discussion about tribal support, documentation, and possible profiling concerns; the transcript cuts off before final disposition of that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that there's some they can authorize maybe to run alongside it, and there's been a lot of also
• We finally figured out what she was referring to: the nighttime security guard who drives up and down
• These bills seem to avoid authority over utility-scale development and local authority over utility-scale
• I urge this committee to please modify these bills and preserve the authority of counties to protect
• , with their landowners, you know, so when they came to the commission, we were sort of caught off guard

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2383, Representative Simmons’s bill addressing theft of copper and other infrastructure-related property. After a brief executive session and no further discussion, the committee voted the bill do pass by a roll call of 17 ayes, 1 no, and 1 present. The committee then heard House Bill 2711, sponsored by Representative Deal, which would lower the assessed valuation of broadband communications equipment from 33.5% to 12% for new broadband equipment placed in service after August 28, 2026, with a proposed sunset period discussed as part of a substitute. Representative Deal and several industry witnesses, including AT&T, Verizon, Missouri Cable Association, Missouri Broadband Providers Association, Missouri Chamber, and electric co-ops, argued the measure would improve Missouri’s competitiveness, encourage private investment, and help expand broadband in rural and underserved areas. Opponents, including county assessors, argued the bill would reduce local tax revenue, create unequal treatment, and could become a precedent for other industries. Committee members questioned whether the bill would apply only to new builds or also to upgrades and existing infrastructure, and whether the tax relief would actually drive expansion into rural areas. The committee then began hearing House Bills 2402 and 2816, which deal with solar energy siting and taxation. The sponsors described the bills as setting local assessment rules for solar projects, establishing a per-megawatt valuation, requiring larger setbacks from homes, schools, and churches, and limiting the amount of tillable land that can be used for solar in a county, while also addressing Chapter 100 agreements and decommissioning concerns. Supporters, including Missouri Farm Bureau and county officials, said the bills would provide needed guardrails, local control, and more consistent taxation. Opponents and affected landowners said existing solar projects have caused glare, dust, noise, and property value concerns, while some developers said they wanted clearer statewide rules and consistency for future projects. The committee did not take final action on the solar bills before going into recess.