Video & Transcript Research : 'Class C misdemeanor'
Page 25 of 500
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Thu Jan 30, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- petty misdemeanor<00:56:24.200><c> allc><00:56:24.480><c> pettyc><00:56:25.000><c> misdemeanors
- c><00:56:26.000><c> umc> misdemeanor all petty misdemeanors um misdemeanor all petty misdemeanors um
- ><c> andc> custody um on very serious Class B and custody um on very serious Class B and Class<01:00
- c><01:00:15.200><c> wec> Class A offenses sometimes because we Class A offenses sometimes because
- 01:02:13.520><c> classc><01:02:13.720><c> ac><01:02:13.839><c> felonyc><01:02:14.319><c> Ic><
Summary:
The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard House Bill 4000, the Judiciary’s biennium budget bill for FY 2026-2027. Judiciary Director of Policy and Planning Brandon Kimura testified in strong support, outlining operating requests of about $6.17 million in FY 26 and $6.25 million in FY 27, 17 permanent positions and one temporary position, plus $9.9 million in capital improvements. He described funding needs for specialty courts, preparations for the Wahiawa District Court, an additional district court judge and staff for Kona, cybersecurity upgrades, the Criminal Justice Research Institute, statewide priority items, and restoration of several essential staff positions. He also said the Judiciary was seeking an additional $2 million for the Children’s Justice Center relocation lump sum because updated estimates had risen to about $8 million. The committee also discussed potential impacts from uncertain federal funding and asked for written follow-up on those risks and on the capital request, including coordination with Budget and Finance.
Several organizations and individuals testified in support of the Judiciary budget, including the Hawaiʻi State Bar Association, Legal Aid Society of Hawaiʻi, and legal service providers. Mioko Eto asked for an additional $1 million for civil legal service providers, explaining that the current funding is spread across multiple providers and that the need remains high. David Copper of Legal Aid supported the request, citing statewide demand, 105 staff, 7,100 cases closed in the past year, and 15,000 calls received, while noting that many people seeking help cannot be served because of capacity limits. He also said recent federal funding disruptions and proposed cuts could affect legal services and related programs. Committee members asked about the Criminal Justice Research Institute’s mission; Kimura said its primary statutory role is to build a database focused on pre-trial reporting and data analysis, though it is also working on probation and mental health-related projects. No vote or final action on HB 4000 was taken in the hearing excerpt provided.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Thu Feb 6, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- sayc><00:17:24.480><c> it'sc><00:17:24.679><c> okayc><00:17:24.839><c> toc><00:17:25.039><c>
- Parts shall be guilty of a misdemeanor<00:27:10.720><c> itc><00:27:10.960><c> doesn'tc><00:27:11.360
- ><c> specc><00:27:11.679><c> itc><00:27:11.799><c> doesc> misdemeanor it doesn't spec it does misdemeanor
- /c> where my concern and comes for the where my concern and comes for the misdemeanor<01:28:00.040><c
- chargec><01:28:03.159><c> soc> misdemeanor to a felony uh charge so misdemeanor to a felony uh charge
Summary:
The committee hearing covered House Bill 279 and House Bill 392, both relating to firearms. HB 279 would restrict carrying or possessing firearm parts except at or between certain locations and in an enclosed container, define firearm parts and prohibited persons, and increase penalties for violations. The Department of Law Enforcement strongly supported the bill, saying it would close a loophole involving disassembled or “ghost gun” parts and help law enforcement charge people who carry weapons in pieces. Most public testimony opposed the measure, with speakers arguing it was unconstitutional, vague, hard to enforce, and would burden lawful gun owners, gunsmiths, and firearm dealers; several also said existing laws already cover the conduct. One supporter, Dennis Dunn, said additional firearm security could reduce theft and suicides. The chair noted the committee had received 270 testimonies on HB 279, with 39 in support, 234 in opposition, and one comment.
The committee then heard HB 392, which would prohibit the possession, transfer, and sale of ghost guns and establish mandatory minimum sentencing for using a ghost gun in a felony. The Department of Law Enforcement and the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s office supported the bill, saying unserialized firearms are difficult to trace and that prosecutors need clear laws to address them. Supporters argued the measure would help prevent untraceable weapons from circulating and align penalties with other firearm offenses. Opponents, including several gun owners and association representatives, said the bill was unnecessary because existing state and federal laws already prohibit unserialized firearms, and warned it could create confusion, criminalize lawful owners of antique or self-built firearms, and be difficult to administer. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion provided.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:15:40.719><c> classesc><01:15:41.119><c> ofc><01:15:41.360><c> people.
- ><c> charges,c><01:18:36.960><c> andc> charges, two misdemeanor charges, and charges, two misdemeanor
- > beingc><01:18:44.960><c> ac> misdemeanor, and it ended up being a misdemeanor, and it ended up
- :48:21.760><c> classc> "... convicted by a circuit court of a class A misdemeanor a de novo jury trial
- c> ofc><01:58:34.960><c> misdemeanor,c> practice, adult victims of misdemeanor, practice, adult victims
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (04/08/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- possession of prescription drugs, class A<00:47:18.240><c> misdemeanor,c><00:47:18.800><c> endangering
- :22.079><c> Ac><00:47:22.240><c> misdemeanor.
- c><00:47:23.599><c> Althoughc><00:47:23.920><c> thec> class A misdemeanor.
- ><c> ac><00:48:28.319><c> childc><00:48:28.880><c> classc><00:48:29.200><c> Ac> of a child class
- A of a child class A misdemeanor.<00:48:31.359><c> Thesec><00:48:31.599><c> arec><00:48:31.760><
Summary:
The committee opened with Senate Bill 22-FN, which would expand child care licensing background checks so the Department of Health and Human Services can receive fuller criminal history information, including pending charges and other non-conviction records, similar to the system already used for school staff. Grant Bossi, for Senator Pearl, and DHHS officials Melissa Clement and Christine Sheay testified in support, saying the bill closes a gap that can allow people with disqualifying charges to work with children. They explained that the FBI record is a snapshot in time, that juvenile records are not included, and that the bill would apply to child care programs including residential group homes. Questions focused on what “confidential criminal history” means and how often checks are repeated; DHHS said checks are done every five years or sooner if new charge information is received. The hearing on SB 22 was then closed.
The committee then took up Senate Bill 23-FN, which would expand the child endangerment statute and remove the word “purposely” from part of the language. Senator Pat Long said the bill is intended to strengthen protection for children and allow more serious conduct to be charged appropriately. Testimony from law enforcement, including Executive Counselor Dave Wheeler, Sergeant Ryan Rooney of Nashua Police, and Nicholas Georgulis of Manchester Police, supported the bill as a way to distinguish routine misdemeanor cases from the most egregious abuse and neglect cases, such as children living in squalor or being exposed to severe danger. Wheeler and some members raised concerns that the language could be vague or overbroad and cited a prior Manchester firearm-in-a-car arrest as an example of possible unintended consequences; supporters responded that the bill still requires knowingly violating a duty of care and that the serious bodily injury or death standard limits its reach. Rooney also described a fentanyl overdose case involving an 11-year-old and said the current misdemeanor charge did not fully reflect the seriousness of the conduct. The committee recessed SB 23 briefly to open and close SB 161, then returned to SB 23, which remained under hearing with no final vote taken in the excerpt.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Legislative Session Day 51 (3-20-26)
Kentucky House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> officec><00:41:09.680><c> doesc> The phrase misdemeanor in office does The phrase misdemeanor
- c> higherc><00:46:04.880><c> involvingc> class C felony or higher involving class C felony or higher
- :59.360><c> asc><01:10:59.760><c> asc> misdemeanor and off standard as as misdemeanor and off standard
- c> misdemeanorc><01:25:56.480><c> toc> rise to the level of a misdemeanor to rise to the level of
- ><c> officec><02:01:09.360><c> andc> finding a misdemeanor in office and finding a misdemeanor in
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (03/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- say a<01:54:55.560><c> Classc><01:54:55.840><c> Ac><01:54:56.079><c> misdemeanorc><01:54:56.679
- ><c> soc><01:54:56.880><c> Ic><01:54:57.000><c> supposec><01:54:57.400><c> itc> a Class A misdemeanor
- ><c> Ac> intended it to be treated as a Class A intended it to be treated as a Class A misdemeanor<
- 55:18.880><c> Classc><01:55:19.159><c> Bc> misdemeanor it would be a Class B misdemeanor it would
- Ac><02:03:39.119><c> misdemeanorc><02:03:39.800><c> wherec><02:03:40.119><c> itc> into a Class
Summary:
The House Judiciary Committee met to hear House Bill 520, which would authorize the Department of Education to issue subpoenas in investigations and hearings involving the code of conduct for New Hampshire educators. Representative Lynn, the bill sponsor, said the measure was intended to give the department standard subpoena power during investigations and in later adjudicatory proceedings, with a process for challenging overbroad subpoenas. He argued that agencies with investigative and hearing authority should also have the power to compel witnesses and documents, and said the bill was narrowed from an earlier broader draft to focus on teacher credentialing and address concerns about scope.
Members raised several concerns about whether the department already has enough authority, whether the Attorney General could handle subpoenas instead, and whether the bill creates an imbalance by giving subpoena power mainly to the investigating side. Representative Burroughs said she did not feel she had enough information and was uncomfortable with the bill, especially regarding who bears subpoena costs. Representative Biron questioned the trial analogy and whether both sides truly have equal subpoena rights. Lynn responded that the investigative stage is like a grand jury process, where only the investigating body subpoenas witnesses, while the adjudicatory stage allows both sides to seek subpoenas through the hearing officer.
Other questions focused on the bill’s scope. Representative Andreos asked what investigative authority the Department of Education already has, and Representative Organ questioned why the bill is limited to educators rather than also covering vendors, charter school boards, or the EFA scholarship organization. Lynn said the limitation to educators was deliberate, because earlier broader versions drew objections for being too expansive. Representative Tur asked whether the Attorney General could already handle such matters, and Lynn said that while the AG might be able to pursue some investigations or court subpoenas, agencies should be able to conduct their own internal investigations. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- These are basically misdemeanors and lower-level felonies. And lower-level felonies.
- Of the time, these individuals that I would be looking at would be either misdemeanors or burglaries.
- You know, what I'm calling a C-level.
- Because again, if you're talking about a low-level misdemeanor and I'm requiring you to either go get
- But I do know that she's saying that it's just limited to Class One municipalities.
Keywords:
hospital liens, medical billing, government healthcare, insurance claims, patient rights, blood tests, DUI, law enforcement, traffic offenses, chemical analysis, public nuisance, event liability, local government, community health, legal action, transparency, reporting, public safety, regulation, accountability
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26
Housing Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- management, and other self-sufficiency classes.<00:04:17.919><c> Thec><00:04:18.160><c> billc><00
- :04:18.400><c> wouldc><00:04:18.639><c> makec><00:04:18.880><c> assaultingc> classes.
- official duties<00:04:26.080><c> ac><00:04:26.320><c> grossc><00:04:26.639><c> misdemeanor.
- c><00:04:27.600><c> Ifc><00:04:27.840><c> thec> duties a gross misdemeanor.
- c><00:05:16.960><c> ac><00:05:17.120><c> homec><00:05:17.280><c> buyerc><00:05:17.680><c> class
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Licensing and Occupations (2-18-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- :24:36.919><c> ac><00:24:37.159><c> Classc><00:24:37.440><c> Bc><00:24:37.720><c> misdemeanor
- c><00:24:38.679><c> slapc><00:24:39.039><c> onc> offense is a Class B misdemeanor slap on offense
- is a Class B misdemeanor slap on the<00:24:39.360><c> handc><00:24:39.960><c> secondc><00:24:40.279
- ><c> offensec><00:24:40.679><c> isc><00:24:40.799><c> ac><00:24:41.000><c> classc><00:24:41.320
- ><c> Ac> the hand second offense is a class A the hand second offense is a class A misdemeanor<00:24
Keywords:
Call to Order 00:00:00
Roll Call 00:00:35
SB 22 Discussion 00:01:20
SB 22 Vote 00:11:45
SB 100 Discussion 00:15:07
SB 100 Vote 00:38:53
SB 88 Discussion Only 00:42:11
Adjournment 01:03:52, 958, all
Summary:
The Senate Standing Committee on Licensing and Occupations met on February 18, 2025, and first took up Senate Bill 22 by Senator Reginald Thomas, which was presented as a cleanup measure following prior cosmetology reforms and a Legislative Oversight and Investigations report. The bill would allow cosmetologists to retake exams multiple times with a one-month wait, authorize the Board of Cosmetology to immediately close facilities that intentionally use unlicensed workers while preserving due process, give the board flexibility to hire an executive director based on qualifications rather than licensure, and recognize certain out-of-state or territorial cosmetology licenses. Board officials said the changes were intended to improve fairness, equality, and administrative due process. Senators asked about retesting fees and whether partial retests could dilute standards; Thomas clarified that the exam is cumulative and must be retaken in full. The committee approved SB 22 with all favorable votes, and Senator Meredith explained his support as a workforce and fairness issue.
The committee then heard Senate Bill 100 by Senator Jimmy Higdon, as substituted, concerning tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product retail licensing and enforcement. Youth advocates from the University of Kentucky testified in support, describing youth nicotine use as a public health crisis and urging stronger enforcement, annual compliance checks, retailer licensing, and tougher penalties for illegal sales to minors. Higdon said the bill would create a Division of Tobacco, Nicotine, and Vapor Products Licensing within ABC, require licenses for retailers, authorize inspections and confiscation of contraband, impose escalating criminal and civil penalties for unlicensed sales and sales to minors, publish a list of licensed retailers, and dedicate fine revenue to enforcement and youth education. He said the measure targeted bad actors rather than responsible retailers. A retailer witness also supported licensing but raised concerns about contradictory product definitions that could sweep in hemp and medical marijuana vapor products, and asked that the bill be delayed until after an expected Supreme Court decision affecting federal vapor-product rules. The transcript ends during discussion of SB 100, before any committee vote on that bill.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- Sometimes, the first time it is considered a misdemeanor.
- And sure, and you're aware that all misdemeanor crimes in Florida, unless specific in 901.15 as a misdemeanor
- Why no misdemeanor presence or warrant exception here in this bill for this misdemeanor requirement?
- unless specific in 901.15 as a misdemeanor warrant exception, all misdemeanors in the state of Florida
- Why no misdemeanor presence or warrant exception here in this bill for this misdemeanor requirement.
Summary:
The Senate Appropriations Committee took up SB 2-C, a major immigration enforcement bill sponsored by Senator Gruters and co-introduced by Senator Fine. Gruters described the measure as a broad crackdown on illegal immigration that would replace a single immigration officer with a State Board of Immigration Enforcement, create a $250 million grant program for local law enforcement, fund additional Department of Agriculture interdiction staff and facilities, expand pretrial detention for certain unauthorized immigrants, increase criminal penalties, require more cooperation with ICE, and eliminate in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students. He and supporters framed the bill as a way to support law enforcement, deter illegal immigration, and align Florida with federal enforcement efforts.
Committee questioning focused heavily on the bill’s education, detention, and enforcement provisions. Senators pressed Gruters and Fine on why the bill did not address employer sanctions or E-Verify, whether the tuition changes would affect students who had grown up in Florida, how sanctuary-policy enforcement would work, and whether the bill would create practical burdens for prosecutors, jails, and local officials. Gruters said he was open to working on E-Verify in regular session but not to amending this bill, and Fine argued the tuition repeal would apply to undocumented students who had qualified under existing law. Sheriff Bob Gualtieri testified in support, saying ICE bed capacity was still insufficient and that county jails needed more resources to honor detainers. Mark Schlachman of FSU Law offered historical context, noting prior state-federal cooperation efforts and warning of unintended consequences, while several public witnesses opposed the bill as unconstitutional, costly, and harmful to immigrant families and the economy.
Opponents from the Southern Poverty Law Center, ACLU of Florida, Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy, Florida Policy Institute, AFL-CIO, and immigrant advocacy groups argued the bill would invite litigation, encourage racial profiling, harm the workforce and higher education, and punish law-abiding immigrants and their families. They emphasized that immigration is a federal matter, that K-12 education must be provided regardless of status, and that removing in-state tuition would reduce access to college and hurt Florida’s economy. Some speakers urged the committee to grandfather current students if the tuition waiver is repealed. The meeting ended with continued public testimony and no final vote reflected in the transcript provided.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary (3-6-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- in our current exposit laws of the<00:29:56.640><c> Classc><00:29:56.919><c> Dc><00:29:57.120><c
- c> youc><00:29:59.200><c> hadc><00:29:59.320><c> toc> the Class D Felony but but um you had to
- the Class D Felony but but um you had to apply<00:29:59.799><c> forc><00:30:00.000><c> themc><00:
- uhc><00:30:56.760><c> misdemeanorsc><00:30:57.760><c> umc> expungement issues uh misdemeanors um
- 20.200><c> upc><00:36:20.359><c> toc><00:36:20.599><c> ac><00:36:20.880><c> Classc><00:36:21.680
Keywords:
Meeting Start: 00:00:00
Roll Call: 00:00:06
SB 75: 00:01:05
Discussion in Opposition to SB 75: 00:11:00
SCR 89: 00:26:30
HB 38: 00:34:51
HB 201: 00:50:16, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first heard Senate Bill 75, sponsored by Senator Reed, which would lower Kentucky’s concealed carry age from 21 to 18. The bill’s supporters, including Taylor McKe of the NRA, argued that 18- to 20-year-olds are legal adults who should have equal Second Amendment rights, noting they can vote, serve in the military, and otherwise be treated as adults. Supporters also cited court decisions and historical arguments, while opponents, including Kathy Hobart and Chuck Eddie, warned that the bill would increase gun violence and put more guns in the hands of young people without adequate training. Senator Carol said he opposed the bill because the brain is not fully mature until about age 25 and called the measure irresponsible; Senator Denine said he would pass the bill but wanted training requirements added; Senator Thomas also opposed it on public safety grounds; and Senator Wheeler supported it as a parity and self-defense measure for law-abiding young adults.
After debate, the committee voted on SB 75 and reported it favorably with the expression of opinion that it should pass. The roll call reflected a mix of support and opposition, with several members explaining their votes. Supporters emphasized self-defense, constitutional rights, and consistency with adult responsibilities, while opponents focused on youth violence, public safety, and the lack of a training requirement.
The committee then took up Senate Concurrent Resolution 89, sponsored by Senator Jimmy Higdon, which would direct the establishment of a Kentucky Restoration of Voting Rights Task Force. Higdon described it as a typical interim work group and said it would include five House and five Senate members. Discussion broadened to expungement and restoration issues, including marijuana-related convictions and other records that members said should be reviewed in light of changing laws. Chair Storm noted he had filed a separate expungement task force resolution and suggested the measures could be coordinated. The resolution was moved, seconded, and the roll was called, with Senator Thomas later explaining support for treating older marijuana convictions more equitably in light of current law.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- uhc><00:29:09.520><c> stalkingc> school class that is uh stalking school class that is uh stalking
- 00:33:42.600><c> stalking,c><00:33:43.679><c> it'sc> for a a misdemeanor stalking, it's for a a misdemeanor
- <c> youc><00:34:22.560><c> know,c> misdemeanor.
- 00:49:06.200><c> bec><00:49:06.400><c> ac><00:49:06.480><c> classc><00:49:07.000><c> Cc><00:49
- c> um of these would be a class C felony. um of these would be a class C felony.
Bills:
SB118, SB203, HB420, HB414, HB363, HB405, HB261, HB263, HB327, HB348, HB228, HB282, SB273, HB7, SB296, SB199, SB47, SB204, HB80, HB11, HB192
Keywords:
bail, offenses, constitutional amendment, criminal justice, law enforcement, public safety, dental insurance, medical loss ratio, premium regulation, insurance commissioner, rebate, consumer protection, Baldwin County, local bill, education funding, school tax, privilege license tax, county tax revenue, municipal school board, Baldwin County Board of Education
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (02/14/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> classc><00:06:49.360><c> forc><00:06:50.039><c> bothc><00:06:50.319><c> UNHc><00:06:50.960
- ><c> studentsc><00:06:51.720><c> andc> online class for both UNH students and online class for both
- ><00:13:44.440><c> designedc><00:13:45.000><c> toc><00:13:45.279><c> goc> class so um the class
- <c> two-dayc><00:32:43.120><c> classc> robust it's not like the two-day class robust it's not like
- c><01:23:53.960><c> thec><01:23:54.440><c> misdemeanorc> times when we're talking the misdemeanor
Summary:
The subcommittee work session focused on HB 153, a bill intended to improve law enforcement response to animal cruelty cases. The bill’s sponsor explained that the proposal would require one sheriff or deputy and one state trooper in each county to receive specific training in animal cruelty laws so they could serve as knowledgeable resources. The sponsor described real-world examples where agencies were unclear about jurisdiction, veterinary involvement, and response protocols, arguing that better training was needed because animal cruelty cases can require quick action and many towns do not have animal control officers.
Jerry Sorenson, a retired UNH professor and longtime animal cruelty instructor, described the existing training structure at Police Standards and Training. He said recruits receive a required two-hour introductory block at the academy, while additional animal cruelty materials and a more comprehensive online resource library are available through the Benchmark system for certified officers. He noted that the older two-day in-service course he taught was more detailed and guided, but the current online materials are more of a self-study resource and are not mandated for in-service officers. He also said the committee could track usage through Benchmark analytics.
Kurt Arenberg of the Humane Society of the United States and Rob Johnson of the Farm Bureau both supported the goal of ensuring a trained law enforcement contact is available statewide, but they questioned whether assigning one trained officer per county would be the best way to achieve it. They emphasized the need for a real-time response and for officers to know where to find help and guidance, rather than expecting one person per county to handle all cases. Vincent Greco of State Police said the agency is willing to help and has handled animal cruelty matters, but he said one trooper per county would not realistically meet the goal given coverage demands and vacancy rates; he suggested broader access to resources and training may be more effective. Representative Freeman asked how cases are handled now and was told State Police responses generally follow standard criminal investigation steps, with assistance from animal control, veterinarians, and other resources when available. No vote or final action was taken during the work session.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- getc><00:24:00.880><c> toc><00:24:00.960><c> classc><00:24:01.360><c> five,c> that allowed me
- for<00:24:10.320><c> ac><00:24:10.360><c> $500c><00:24:10.960><c> classc><00:24:11.880><c> um<
- /c><00:24:12.040><c> thatc><00:24:12.160><c> canc> for a $500 class um that can for a $500 class
- ,c><00:24:27.679><c> otherc> these classes.
- ,c><00:44:35.680><c> thec> creates two classes of victims, the creates two classes of victims, the
Keywords:
harassment, restraining order, temporary restraining order, injunction, protective order, public employer, public servant, public employee, government employee, state employee, legislator, judge, judicial branch, executive branch, local government, political subdivision, workplace violence, threats, stalking, employee safety
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Criminal Jurisprudence S/C New Offenses and Changed Penalties May 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- First, the bill will elevate first-time DWIs from a Class B to a Class A misdemeanor, and in some cases
- You're only giving an incentive to take a misdemeanor into a felony.
- So while there are already laws that ban felons and those with some types of misdemeanors from owning
- A misdemeanor to a state jail felony.
- A misdemeanor to a state jail felony.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (03/07/2025)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- c> toc><00:12:57.600><c> ac><00:12:57.760><c> classc><00:12:58.079><c> fac><00:12:58.959><c>
- classc><00:12:59.279><c> ac><00:12:59.519><c> felonyc> subject uh to a class fa class a felony
- subject uh to a class fa class a felony for<00:13:00.480><c> violatingc><00:13:01.040><c> thec><00
- c><00:13:42.320><c> withc><00:13:42.480><c> ac><00:13:42.720><c> classc><00:13:42.880><c> A
- > classc><00:30:39.279><c> Bc> misdemeanor, it's going to be a class B misdemeanor, it's going to
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, April 23, 2026)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- > thec><02:04:37.199><c> Epsteinc><02:04:37.840><c> class.
- thesec><02:25:43.359><c> uhc><02:25:43.920><c> classesc><02:25:44.319><c> thatc><02:25:44.479
- c><02:51:31.200><c> toc> misdemeanor is.
- c><02:52:34.240><c> andc><02:52:34.479><c> rankedc><02:52:35.359><c> andc> wants to be classed
- ><c> andc><02:57:01.600><c> misdemeanors."
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (02/13/2026)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- <c> knowc><02:19:38.800><c> it'sc><02:19:38.960><c> ac><02:19:39.040><c> classc><02:19:39.280
- charged for a misdemeanor<02:22:50.479><c> ifc><02:22:50.720><c> theyc><02:22:50.880><c> takec
- ><02:22:51.120><c> offc><02:22:51.760><c> butc><02:22:52.000><c> theyc> misdemeanor if they take
- So it's not like<02:23:01.680><c> misdemeanorsc><02:23:02.479><c> can'tc><02:23:02.720><c> bec>
- misdemeanors misdemeanors uh<02:23:15.840><c> withc><02:23:16.160><c> thec><02:23:16.319><c> statute
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice Sep 23rd, 2025
Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- There's also thresholds with, you know, there's C.
- misdemeanors lounging in the MDC on misdemeanor charges.
- How many misdemeanor arrests are you seeing on average each day? Mr.
- A class action lawsuit was brought against San Juan County, resulting in damages to members of the class
- Each of the members of the class received damages.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That's a Class B misdemeanor punishable up to six months in the Dallas County Jail.
- So if you're going to increase a Class B misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor, I mean, right now, Dallas
- County Jail, Misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor.
- Now, you said a class C. I'm assuming that's a class B. Class B. Okay.
- It's just a municipal court fine, or a Class C misdemeanor, is that, or Class B?