Transcript Highlights:

• So on the left, the 2026 total by program shows the four current budgeted... ...total by program shows
• . ...$601,781,000 to the hospital assessment budget program for the budget and for a budget-neutral program
• The Medicaid Integrity Program.
• safety program.
• ISP receives a formula grant from the federal motor carrier safety administration program, abbreviated

Summary: The Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee met with a quorum and first took up the Department of Health and Welfare’s Division of Medicaid. Members approved a 2026 supplemental for the Medicaid forecast adjustment, increasing general fund and dedicated fund spending while reducing federal funds, and also approved a separate budget-neutral 2026 supplemental to move hospital assessment funding into a dedicated fund and create a new hospital assessment budgeted program, as required by House Bill 345. Both motions passed with do-pass recommendations after roll-call votes. The committee then considered the 2027 Medicaid budget. Testimony covered MMIS procurement, estate recovery staffing, program integrity contract support, Medicaid purchasing staff tied to the Department of Administration, hospital assessment fund alignment, population forecast adjustments, and an additional governor’s initiative reduction. Three competing motions were offered: one from Representative Bruce, one from Senator Cook, and one from Senator Wintrow. After debate over provider-rate cuts, RESHAB funding, forecast assumptions, and whether to reduce the governor’s requested $22 million adjustment, the Bruce motion failed and the Cook substitute failed, while the Wintrow motion passed and received a do-pass recommendation. The committee next approved Idaho State Police budgets. It passed a Brand Inspection Division request for $288,100 in dedicated funds for replacement vehicles and equipment, a Division of Idaho State Police motion adding funds for the commercial vehicle safety grant, a mobile live scan pilot, and replacement items, and a POST Academy motion for $324,100 in dedicated funds for replacement items. The Department of Juvenile Corrections budget was also approved, including a clinician services transfer from Health and Welfare, replacement items, IT hardware, and restoration of direct care and mentoring funding with six FTPs. Finally, the committee considered the Department of Administration and Military Division budgets; after debate over Medicaid procurement staffing and a training position transfer, the committee approved a Department of Administration motion with reduced general fund and increased dedicated funding, then approved the Military Division’s request for emergency management overhead recovery and state education assistance funding. The meeting ended with announcements of the next Monday agenda and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so we would have retraining programs, and we actually have a specific program called the Economic
• Transition Program.
• Wow, you have a great program. How long has this program been around?
• But the Economic Transition Program is... ...and it's a federally funded program, so it's always been
• My paternal grandparents are from Grants.

Bills: SB100

Keywords: burglary, aggravated burglary, dwelling, criminal law, property rights, 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, so primarily what we're doing with this program is pulling the asbestos out of the program, is
• We have not administered a grant in a little over six years just because of the program funding, the
• that program in the last three years.
• that program in the last three years. probably haven't had anybody through that program in the last
• That's a good program. Thank you. Remember? That's a good program. Thank you.

Summary: The committee first reviewed the Division of Environmental Quality’s asbestos abatement program. DEQ officials explained that the program licenses asbestos-related workers and businesses, including contractors, workers, inspectors, planners/designers, consultants, air monitors, and training providers, under federal and state requirements. Members asked about asbestos use today, grant funding for removal, inspections funded by fees and fines, complaint handling, enforcement authority, and health risks. DEQ said some asbestos-containing products are still manufactured, grants have not been issued in over six years due to funding constraints, inspectors investigate complaints and can issue civil penalties or other enforcement actions, and exposure can cause asbestosis and mesothelioma. The report was accepted without objection. The committee then heard from the Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Training. Officials described the agency’s standards and training divisions, three basic academies, advanced training, and jail standards training. Members asked about recruitment, academy capacity, training costs, and curriculum changes. The commission said recruitment and retention are improving, basic academy enrollment is around 700 per year with capacity for about 725 to 750, training costs counties nothing because the state funds it, and basic training is being expanded from 528 hours to 705 hours with more practical instruction based on input from chiefs and sheriffs. Questions also covered detention officer training, school resource officer training, and whether other agencies are subject to the same standards. Officials said detention officers receive separate training, school resource officers have standalone training approved by the commission, and other law enforcement divisions such as the Department of Agriculture are held to the same standards. They also noted a Veterans to Law Enforcement program that allows eligible veterans to attend the academy without first being hired by an agency, with GI Bill support. The report was accepted without objection, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so the summer program, which colleges were able to institute, maybe, um, program which colleges were
• And so we are still very much supporting that program.
• certain entities to support youth development programs.
• It defines youth development programs and specifies prioritization requirements for the grant funding
• to support youth development programs.

Summary: The Early Learning and K-12 Education Committee began with a clarification about a prior budget bill affecting Running Start, emphasizing that it would reduce per-student funding to colleges but would not reduce student participation in the program. The committee then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 6277, which would promote educational stability for children of military families by easing enrollment rules, extending proof-of-residency deadlines to 90 days, allowing conditional enrollment before arrival, and requiring timely transfer and implementation of IEPs and 504 plans. Support came from the bill sponsor, students, school psychologists, military family advocates, and veterans groups, while school district representatives raised concerns about accelerated special education timelines and related costs. No vote was taken on the bill during the hearing. The committee then moved into executive session on a first packet of bills. It adopted a proposed substitute for Senate Bill 5992 creating a youth development fund account and prioritizing tribal and American Indian/Alaska Native youth, and advanced the bill to Rules. It passed Senate Bill 6078 on child care provider supports, advanced Senate Bill 6089 on P20W education data with a substitute that added stakeholder intent language, limited nonprofit authority, and FERPA protections, and adopted an amendment to Senate Bill 5918 increasing school materials, supplies, and operating costs funding, then sent it to Ways and Means. In the second packet, the committee considered Senate Bill 5861 on school board director districts, but rejected an amendment that would have required candidates to be elected only by voters in their director district rather than at large. It then adopted a substitute and advanced the bill. The committee also advanced Senate Bill 6118 requiring cardiac emergency response plans in schools, with a substitute making implementation contingent on state funding; Senate Bill 6065 allowing certain financially distressed districts to use transportation vehicle funds under limited conditions; and Senate Bill 6052 directing development of a statewide digital transcript exchange system, which was sent to Ways and Means. The meeting ended with adjournment after all scheduled executive action was completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will pursue more and greater program alignment.
• How are those programs actually delivering?
• Like, what other programs should we be contemplating?
• Program integration and effectiveness would be even greater if these homelessness programs were formally
• to make best use of federal housing program Royce. programs specifically to make best use of federal

Summary: The joint hearing focused on the Governor’s 2025 reorganization plan to split the Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency into two new agencies: a Business and Consumer Services Agency and a California Housing and Homelessness Agency. Administration officials said the change would give each side more focused leadership, improve consumer protection and regulatory oversight, and better align housing and homelessness policy with the state’s broader housing goals. Leaders from the Department of Consumer Affairs, Cannabis Control, Alcoholic Beverage Control, and Financial Protection and Innovation all voiced support for the business-side reorganization, while housing officials emphasized that the new housing agency would help streamline funding, compliance, and coordination across programs. Members raised concerns about timing, budget impacts, office space, and whether the split would actually reduce bureaucracy. The administration said the plan would be included in the May Revision, was intended to be cost-neutral, and would not require fee increases for licensees or additional office space. On the housing side, officials said the new Housing Development and Finance Committee would work toward a single application and more coordinated award process for affordable housing funding, while preserving CalHFA’s statutory and financial independence. They also said the reorganization would improve compliance monitoring, data collection, and coordination with local governments, including Los Angeles homelessness programs. Public testimony was largely supportive. Industry groups representing beverage distributors, craft brewers, wine, mortgage lenders, and housing organizations backed the business-side split, and housing advocates such as Housing California, the California Housing Partnership, and the California Housing Consortium supported the housing agency concept and the proposed one-stop-shop approach. Several witnesses urged that tax credits, bonds, and other funding sources be better coordinated, and some said the plan should be paired with additional state investment and implementation resources. No formal vote was taken; the hearing was informational.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is leave granted for Representative Brandon Acre? So granted.
• Is leave granted for Representative Brandon Achor? So granted.
• Is leave granted for Representative Mark Perry? So moved.
• Through that program, Holly was assigned an advocate, Latasha.
• Through that program, Holly was assigned an advocate, Latasha.

Summary: The transcript covers the opening of the Arkansas House and a joint session of the 95th General Assembly’s fiscal session. The House first established a quorum, granted leave for absent members, recognized guests, and adopted House Resolution 1001 to convene a joint session with the Senate for Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders’s address. Several bills and resolutions were read for the record, including House Resolution 1002 and House Bills 1001, 102, and 103, before the House recessed to await the Senate and then the governor. In the joint session, leaders recognized the late Representative Stan Barry with a moment of silence, introduced constitutional officers, judges, and other guests, and appointed committees to escort the governor. Governor Sanders then delivered a lengthy fiscal-session address focused on her budget priorities and policy agenda. She emphasized continued funding for education under LEARNS, teacher pay and literacy gains, public safety and law enforcement funding, government efficiency and tax cuts, and the 1033 initiative aimed at helping vulnerable Arkansans move from crisis to self-sufficiency. She also urged lawmakers to avoid new Medicaid mandates or ongoing spending and said she would call a special session to cut income taxes further if the budget is passed. After the governor’s remarks, the joint session adjourned. The House then reconvened briefly, adopted a motion to adjourn until the next day, and announced that the Joint Budget Committee would meet later that afternoon and again the following morning.

Transcript Highlights:

• or another comparable office and county government since our county judges do not administer SB 22 grant
• received under the SB 22 grant program.
• Any authority that would go to grant that level of Restructuring of that water, it would still be in
• , but we also know comprehensive parental leave programs can also be costly.
• program where now state employees have the ability to donate their hours to this parental leave.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our first concern has... ...around the implementation of the grant program that's presented.
• I want to just clarify for the record that the grant program applies to all schools in the state.
• They can all apply for this grant program, and the grant is subject to appropriations for this intended
• And so that's why this grant program is so... ...without us even realizing it.
• And so that's why this grant program is so important in ensuring that we provide the tools and the resources

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Geothermal energy debate program.
• We can look at the local government joining planning grants, and then they actually have a rebate program
• Members, I'm happy to be carrying House File 771, which would create a supplemental grant program to
• Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP.
• The program season has ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• IT IS AMAZING TO ME THE AMOUNT OF SUPPORT THE COUNCILS HAVE AND IT IS BECAUSE OF THE PROGRAMS AND HOW
• , AND PROGRAMS THAT OTHERWISE WOULD PROBABLY BE OUT OF REACH FOR US BECAUSE OF OUR LIMITED RESOURCES
• AND OTHER GRANTS OBTAINED THAT DIRECTLY BENEFIT LOCAL COMMUNITIES.
• REMOVING REGIONAL COUNCILS FROM STATUTE WILL DISRUPT PROGRAMS THAT LOCAL COMMUNITIES RELY ON.
• THIS COMES THROUGH THE BUSINESS FUNDING SUPPORT PROGRAMS.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our launch program goes to religious institutions. So we're already hitting that gray area.
• They have to have other parameters on why they don't qualify for programs.
• Because of the launch program and other programs in the state, you were already doing what the Supreme
• Consider Idaho launch grants. They're available to a wide variety of programs.
• It constrains the forms of education choice programs, requiring unnecessary choice.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 2 and 3, then introduced RS 33159, which would shift most state IT procurement authority to OITS/IT professionals, with some exceptions for entities like the military, judicial and legislative branches, constitutional officers, and schools. The committee also introduced RS 33195, a campaign finance clarification requiring candidates to maintain separate election bank accounts and certify loans to those accounts to the Secretary of State within seven days. The main item was H.J.R. 7, which would place before Idaho voters a constitutional amendment to repeal Article 9, Section 5, the state’s Blaine Amendment prohibiting aid to sectarian institutions. The sponsor and supporters argued the provision has discriminatory, anti-Catholic and anti-Mormon roots, conflicts with recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions on religious neutrality, and has already led to litigation and confusion over programs like school choice and public facility access. Opponents argued the provision protects church-state separation, public school funding, and neutrality, and warned repeal could open the door to public funding for religious schools and related government entanglement. The committee heard extensive testimony on both sides, including from policy groups, attorneys, students, and a pastor who described being denied access to a charter school facility because of the Blaine Amendment. Supporters emphasized voter choice and constitutional conflict with federal law; opponents stressed discrimination concerns, public accountability, and possible effects on public education. After closing debate, the committee voted 8-6 to send H.J.R. 7 to the floor with a due pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• that we have made to date on the program.
• The other part is now that we're going to one track instead of two tracks in the program.
• We've completed the match on our largest grant, which was the R grant that came back a number of years
• grants open, because I think it's the right thing to do, is to apply for those grants.
• However, in terms of impact of the program, it is always about, you took $4 billion away.

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee held an informational hearing on the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s 2026 draft business plan and next steps for the project. Chair Cortese opened by noting major changes since the 2024 plan, including new leadership, a bottoms-up review, scope changes in the Central Valley, loss of federal funds, and renewed interest in private investment and value capture. The Authority’s CEO, Ian Chaudhary, presented the project as moving into a construction and track-laying phase, citing progress on Central Valley structures, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocations, and a new procurement for track and systems. He said the plan reflects a more disciplined, optimized approach, with the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment targeted for revenue service around 2033 and the broader Phase 1 corridor envisioned as commercially viable through ancillary revenues, public-private partnerships, and future private financing. Committee members questioned the Authority about station relocations, single-tracking, tax increment financing, utility relocation authority, transparency, and the feasibility of private financing. Chaudhary said the Merced and Bakersfield station locations were still under discussion with local governments and that no contracts had been finalized. He defended the reduced scope and single-track approach as a just-in-time strategy to avoid overbuilding, while maintaining high-speed standards. He also said the Authority was exploring land value capture, broadband, energy, and other corridor-based revenue sources, but acknowledged that some tools would require legislative action and that private financing options were still being evaluated. Several senators expressed support for the project but raised concerns about permitting delays, local opposition, constitutional and statutory limits, and the need for stronger accountability. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and the High-Speed Rail Inspector General then gave critical assessments of the draft plan. LAO staff said the plan assumes major statutory changes, understates risk, lacks transparency about scope changes, and may not fully fund even the smaller Merced-to-Bakersfield segment once borrowing costs and other uncertainties are considered. Inspector General Ben Belknap said the draft plan does not comply with newer statutory requirements in SB 198 and AB 377, citing three main deficiencies: unauthorized scope changes to the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment, an inadequate funding plan that omits financing costs, and missing procurement milestone dates. He said the Authority’s presentation obscures the true cost and schedule impacts of the project changes, and that incomplete reporting limits legislative oversight. The Authority responded that it would address the OIG’s findings in the final business plan, and committee members indicated they expected a written response on compliance issues.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> education in their teacher prep program. education in their teacher prep program.
• :52:47.599><c> programs</c> called those programs high-risk programs called those programs high-risk
• </c> high-risisk, and protect the programs. high-risisk, and protect the programs.
• </c> for high-risk programs. for high-risk programs.
• , let alone implement strong program integrity across programs.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a workforce empowerment program.
• And this coaching program does it. It's been successful. The school meal program.
• and our access program.
• So, again, we want these programs to be robust and ready to serve those who qualify for the program.
• Otherwise, you shouldn't be on the program.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Fifty percent of the grants will be distributed to states equally for approved grants, and LFC estimates
• So it really was sort of a seminal program. of the seminal program.
• And that has engendered candor programs or communication resolution programs—programs that are endorsed
• We have one of the longest-running ECHO programs in New Mexico, which is our Hepatitis C program.
• So because of the success of the peer education program, we started the community peer education program

Transcript Highlights:

• program.
• It's a new program.
• of the SR Plus program.
• We run the TEACH program.
• We use Teach in our programs. It is an amazing program.

Summary: The Education Administration Subcommittee held an introductory meeting focused largely on member introductions and “homework” reports about education issues in each district. Members raised a wide range of concerns and priorities, including early childhood care and VPK access, school choice and school closures, teacher recruitment and retention, conflict resolution and school safety, early literacy and preparedness, technology and AI/STEM instruction, attendance and mental health, ESE services, dual enrollment and career/technical education, caregiving youth, and real-time student enrollment/funding tracking. Several members also emphasized local challenges such as housing-driven teacher turnover, disaster-related attendance problems, and funding inequities across counties. The committee then heard a detailed presentation on Florida’s early learning system from Chancellor Carrie Miller of the Department of Education’s Division of Early Learning. She outlined the structure and funding of School Readiness, VPK, and the Gold Seal Quality Care program, the role of early learning coalitions and DCF, and the state’s quality and accountability measures. She highlighted the importance of kindergarten readiness, teacher quality, and the new School Readiness Plus program, which helps families transition off subsidy more gradually. Additional panelists from the Children’s Forum, the Early Learning Coalition of Miami-Dade/Monroe, and a Tallahassee child care provider discussed workforce shortages, low wages, provider turnover, the TEACH scholarship program, Help Me Grow, local coalition operations, and the need for more providers and more consistent regulation. During questions, members asked about wait lists, special needs services, teacher retention, provider onboarding, and DCF regulation. The panel said Miami-Dade’s wait list was about 4,000 children and described priority categories for service; they also said children with disabilities are screened and referred for support, though not given a separate priority category. Panelists reported that TEACH has helped reduce turnover through education support and service commitments, but said wages and career pathways remain major issues. Members also pressed for clearer, more consistent licensing standards and more support for new providers entering the field. No formal votes or committee actions were taken in the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:14:16.079><c> the</c> section to consider when granting the section to consider when granting
• </c><00:14:32.880><c> that</c><00:14:33.120><c> waiver</c> can still grant that waiver can still grant
• actual program rules.
• </c> two programs. two programs.
• </c> for us to have grant have to grant some for us to have grant have to grant some sort<00:40:36.079

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee began with routine business, including the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the minutes, seating of an alternate member, and approval of the consent agenda. It then took up Department of Health and Human Services Rule 25188 on New Hampshire Early Childhood and Out-of-School Time Credentials. Staff explained that the rule adopts two new parts to implement RSA 170E:50, which had long required rules. The main issue was an unclear comment created by changes in the department’s amended conditional approval request: language defining out-of-school-time basics and a requirement tied to the New Hampshire Professional Registry training transcript had been removed, creating a mismatch between the form and the rule text. The department said it revised the language so the form and rule now match. A member also asked about the fee schedule, and the department said the fees are sufficient and supported in part by federal funds. The committee then approved Rule 25188 as amended, with oral edits, on a voice vote. The committee next considered Department of Environmental Services Rule 25206, dealing with subsurface wastewater rules and an administrative fine schedule. Staff said most comments had been addressed, but one remaining issue concerned the fine schedule because the prior interim rule had expired years ago. Staff also noted public concerns about septic tank replacement sizes, but pointed to waiver provisions and replacement-in-kind language that would still allow smaller existing systems to be replaced under certain conditions. DES officials explained that the rule package adds the fine schedule into the program rules and that no fines have been brought under these expired provisions for many years. They also described the waiver and grandfathering provisions as intended to protect existing systems and seasonal campgrounds from unnecessary upgrades. A public witness, Christopher Albert, testified that two sections of the rule would harm manufactured home parks and cooperatives. He argued that the new “two people per bedroom” assumption and the minimum bedroom threshold for using water-meter data would inflate design flows, make water-meter data unusable, and increase costs for low-income residents. Committee members questioned both the witness and the agency about the assumptions. DES staff responded that the two-person-per-bedroom standard is meant for individual on-site system design, not citywide planning, and that water-meter data is only useful in larger or unusual facilities. They said the rule still allows flexibility through waivers and grandfathering for existing uses, and that the drinking-water rule cited by the witness was not the correct comparison. No final vote on Rule 25206 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• They don't want to adopt a program that could later be questioned or challenged.
• Maybe we could put a grant program together after we know the size of the problem.
• Account, and grants or donations are still permitted for this purpose.
• In 1944, the state of Texas granted this to the district.
• This bill does not grant the district new authority to dredge.

Bills: SB249, SB546, SB744, SB927, SB1227, SB1229, SB1353, SB1365, SB1366, SB1394, SB1464, SB1709, SB1729, SB1733, SB1744, SB1745, SB1746, SB1772, SB1816, SB1841, SB1939

Keywords: memorial markers, law enforcement, officer memorials, killed in the line of duty, highway signage, school bus, school district, student transportation, child safety, seat belts, three-point seat belt, two-point seat belt, bus retrofit, bus warranty, Texas Education Agency, TEA, transportation code, school activity bus, multifunction school activity bus, school-chartered bus

Transcript Highlights:

• So there is No expected reduction in the Head Start program.
• We've been funding the sheriff's grant program now for this will be year 3.
• chosen for that program?
• a This would be a program that is anticipated to be a three-year, yeah, it's a one-year pilot program
• for the program.

Bills: SB1177

Keywords: education funding, mental health services, public safety, housing, state budget, 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's language letters program.
• </c> kindergart readiness readiness program. kindergart readiness readiness program.
• training programs.
• </c> training programs. training programs.
• </c><01:57:40.000><c> grant</c><01:57:40.719><c> that</c> like certain building grants grant that like

Keywords: 1191, senate, all