Transcript Highlights:

• people with low incomes, including seniors, get the food that they need for nutritious and well-balanced
• people with low incomes, including seniors, get the food that they need for nutritious and well-balanced
• people with low incomes, including seniors, get the food that they need for nutritious and well-balanced
• people with low incomes, including seniors, get the food that they need for nutritious and well-balanced
• These are funds that don't belong to the state, so they don't necessarily show up in budget fund balances

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Without this balance and transportation funding, it harms the metro area, ultimately the state.
• Without this balance and transportation funding, it harms the metro area, ultimately the state.
• it's not uh it's other it's not balanced it's not uh it's not<01:53:15.960><c> it's</c><01:53:16.079
• so</c><01:53:57.560><c> I</c><01:53:57.719><c> just</c><01:53:58.079><c> uh</c> having it being balanced
• so I just uh having it being balanced so I just uh wish<01:53:58.760><c> that</c><01:53:58.920><c> we

Bills: HF5

Keywords: tax modification, transportation funding, electric vehicle tax, Social Security subtraction, retail delivery fee, motor vehicle registration, state budget, transportation policy, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• latitude to put together an alternative amendment, and so what we have tried to do is, again, to balance
• line in terms of the amendment that you have before you is that we have sought to strike the right balance
• So, it would look a little bit different, but there are, you know, checks and balances in there.
• 01:00:37.680><c> know,</c><01:00:37.800><c> checks</c><01:00:38.080><c> and</c><01:00:38.200><c> balances
• </c> there are you know, checks and balances there are you know, checks and balances in<01:00:38.800>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We feel like it's a strong step that strikes the right balance between the enforcement and oversight
• We feel like it's a strong step that strikes the right balance between the enforcement and oversight
• It's fair and balanced for those individuals.
• It's fair and balanced for those individuals.
• This bill protects property rights, safeguards constitutional liberties, and restores balance between

Summary: The committee took up House Bill 2308, which would prohibit a dental insurer or its holding company from owning interests in dental practices regulated by the Arizona Board of Dental Examiners. The sponsor and Arizona Dental Association argued the bill is meant to prevent vertical integration and insurer control over provider care, while Delta Dental opposed it, saying the measure would block nonprofit insurers from investing in clinics for indigent care and create divestment burdens. After discussion of possible exemptions and market-share caps, the committee passed HB 2308 on a 7-0 vote. The committee then considered House Bill 4001, as amended, which creates a licensing and enforcement framework for alternative nicotine products beginning in 2028, increases penalties for sales to minors, restricts youth-oriented marketing, and licenses manufacturers and distributors. Supporters, including the sponsor, Border Security Alliance, Arizona Petroleum Marketers Association, and Vapor Technology Association, said the bill would improve supply-chain transparency and help curb illegal products and youth vaping. Opponents, including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, argued it should instead use a full tobacco retail licensing model and that the bill’s enforcement structure lacks sufficient resources. The committee adopted the amendment and passed the bill 6-1. House Bill 2873, as amended, was also approved unanimously. The strike-everything amendment allows a person or organization that filed a city or town referendum petition to withdraw it before ballot qualification, applies the rule retroactively to withdrawals filed on or after January 1, 2026, and bars tallying or canvassing votes for referenda with a withdrawal notice. The sponsor described it as a common-sense governance fix, and the committee gave it a 7-0 do-pass recommendation. The committee next heard House Bill 2408, which revises Arizona Board of Nursing complaint procedures, confidentiality, investigation timelines, expungement authority, and related disciplinary processes. Nursing board officials opposed parts of the bill, warning that changes to nursing education oversight and tighter deadlines could weaken patient safety and increase costs and liability, while the Arizona Nurses Association and several nurses supported the bill as a way to prioritize serious complaints, improve timeliness, and allow expungement in appropriate cases. After adopting the amendment, the committee passed HB 2408 on a 5-2 vote. The committee also passed House Bill 2342, which limits HOA restrictions on backyard shade structures, and House Bill 2323, which extends Arizona’s motor vehicle lemon law protections to lessees, both by unanimous votes. Finally, the committee began hearing House Bill 4010 on creating a Board of Genetic Counselors, with the sponsor and supporters describing it as a licensure and patient-safety measure; the transcript ends during testimony on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think we have to balance the legislative executive branch issue, but because they're almost clearly
• .. ...to develop a policy and, you know, eventually a law here that helps to draw that line that balances
• of these things, good fiscal management, making sure that we are reconciling our accounts, we're balancing
• But, you know, we want to be transparent, but there is a fine line to balance there.
• ...how do we find that balance and how do we align resources, and in my opinion, aligning resources at

Summary: The task force reviewed survey results from state agencies on potential statutory revisions, with Levi reporting 70 proposals from 20 agencies and noting that about 33 might become agency pre-file bills. Members discussed the need to share the survey more broadly within higher education and to better coordinate issues involving IT and other cross-agency functions. The task force then heard from the Office of Management and Budget on three topics: concessions, architect/engineering pre-qualification, and legal notices. OMB said the concessions law is outdated and inconsistent with current practice, and suggested a collaborative rewrite to allow best-value evaluation, raise the threshold, and standardize solicitation templates. On architect/engineering pre-qualification, OMB proposed expanding authority beyond current state-agency limits and creating uniform templates. On legal notices, OMB proposed modernizing publication requirements, exploring online and abbreviated notices, and working with newspapers and other stakeholders on technology and accessibility improvements. Members asked about where concession revenues go, whether political subdivisions must follow the same rules, and how to move from discussion to action. The task force agreed to have OMB work with Legislative Council and affected stakeholders to develop bill drafts, and the motion passed unanimously. The University of North Dakota then presented a series of proposed revisions focused on public buildings and procurement. UND asked to rework the definition of construction so routine maintenance and one-for-one replacements over $250,000 would not automatically trigger public-improvement requirements, suggested raising the threshold to $500,000, and asked for more flexibility based on project complexity and risk. UND also proposed changes to public bid advertisements to reflect electronic bidding, revisions to construction manager-at-risk selection criteria, changes to architect/engineer procurement rules, an increase in the direct-hire design threshold, and a higher legislative-consent threshold for privately funded projects. The task force supported having UND work with counsel and OMB to develop bill drafts, and that motion also passed. The Department of Public Instruction concluded with proposed cleanup to credentialing and education statutes. DPI recommended reviewing its credential categories for relevance, possibly transferring credentialing authority to the Education Standards and Practices Board, removing outdated school safety patrol language, clarifying waiver provisions, and updating dyslexia screening reporting requirements so the statute reflects current practice. Members focused mainly on whether the dyslexia reporting requirement should remain, and DPI said the screening itself would continue even if reporting language were revised. No votes were taken on DPI’s suggestions, and the task force recessed after the presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think we have to balance the legislative executive branch issue, but because they're almost clearly
• language together to develop a policy and, eventually, a law here that helps to draw that line that balances
• of these things, good fiscal management, making sure that we are reconciling our accounts, we're balancing
• But, you know, we want to be transparent, but there is a fine line to balance there.
• And how do we... ...willing to go back and kind of evaluate and look, how do we find that balance and

Summary: The task force met with a quorum and first reviewed a memorandum summarizing a survey of state agencies on possible statute revisions. Levi reported that 20 agencies submitted 70 proposals, with about 33 potentially becoming agency pre-file bills. Common themes included procurement, concessions, architect/engineering services, liability limits, and IT-related efficiencies. Members asked about sharing the survey results more broadly and about cross-agency coordination, especially with higher education and ITD-related issues. OMB then presented three topics from its survey responses: concessions, pre-qualification of architects/engineers/construction managers/land surveyors, and publication of legal notices. OMB said the current concessions law is too rigid because it requires award to the highest responsible bidder and does not fit newer concession models, and it suggested a best-value approach, a higher threshold, and standardized templates. On architect/engineering pre-qualification, OMB said the law is fragmented across several statutes and should be consolidated and expanded for broader use. On legal notices, OMB described the current rate-setting and publication process, noted rising costs and shrinking newspaper availability, and proposed a collaborative effort to modernize notice delivery, improve accessibility, and explore online options. The task force discussed how to move these ideas forward, and a motion passed directing OMB to implement its suggestions and report back at the next meeting. The University of North Dakota then presented several proposed revisions focused on public buildings and procurement. UND recommended raising the threshold for treating routine maintenance and one-for-one replacements as construction, arguing that the current $250,000 threshold forces unnecessary architect/engineer involvement and adds cost. It also proposed changes to bid advertisement language to reflect electronic bidding, revisions to construction manager-at-risk selection criteria, changes to architect/engineer procurement criteria, a higher direct-hire threshold for design services, and an increase in the legislative approval threshold for privately funded projects. Members discussed the need for data, risk and complexity considerations, and collaboration with counsel and industry groups. A motion passed directing Levi and counsel to work with UND on bill drafts based on its proposals for a future meeting. DPI followed with a shorter presentation on credentialing and statutory cleanup. It suggested reviewing the department’s 23 credential categories for relevance, and said DPI and the Education Standards and Practices Board have discussed transferring some credentialing authority to ESPB. DPI also recommended removing outdated school safety patrol language, cleaning up waiver provisions, and updating dyslexia screening reporting requirements so districts are not burdened by obsolete reporting mandates. Members agreed the screening itself should remain in place, while the reporting requirement could be reconsidered. The committee then recessed until the afternoon session.

Transcript Highlights:

• You balance work with family and with playtime. And that balance is very important.
• made some notes, and you've heard this from each other as we've talked about it, but I think the balance
• Missoulo, for whom I have a lot of respect, he talked about our need for balance.
• So how do we find balance for all parents?
• We have a responsibility to balance public health, but we should not be telling parents that as government

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• a judge, she wants everyone who comes before her to have an opportunity to be heard, while also balancing
• defense attorneys, and defendants, and to be able to be the fair and impartial party that weighs and balances
• And in those 10 years in family court dealing with juveniles and delinquency, I came up with this balance
• But that accountability is balanced with opportunities to make your mistake your purpose.
• That's also balanced against the fact that I also am holding accountable those that would take advantage

Keywords: House Committee Room C, General Assembly Building, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Why this change matters: the revised threshold strikes a balance between oversight and infrastructure
• Uh, it requires a political balance.
• in the room and a seat at the table, who are dedicated solely to their concerns and not having to balance
• in the room and a seat at the table, who are dedicated solely to their concerns and not having to balance
• in the room and a seat at the table, who are dedicated solely to their concerns and not having to balance

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:38 SB 213 Discussion 00:01:23 SB 213 Roll Call Vote 00:20:45 SB 8 Discussion 00:26:23 SB 8 Roll Call Vote 00:58:16, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of personalization at all levels, and there’s no oversight in the form of some sort of check and balance
• And so, to your point, that oversight and that check and balance isn’t there.
• There's only so much movement that my clients can engage in, so I have to balance and counterbalance.
• In that courtroom, fundamental rights are being balanced: the right of the parent to raise the child
• In that courtroom, fundamental rights are being balanced.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We always have to balance whether programs are able to be open with the possibility that they will close
• Looking at language more so as a permit over licensure, where it is a quick checks and balances to make
• They have the balance of the parents of girls and boys who are in PE class that go into locker rooms
• and take showers afterwards, balancing against folks who I...
• Afterwards, balancing against folks who identify, and at some point, the private schools need to have

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several bills, beginning with HB 2855, which would let the Department of Labor adjust workers’ compensation administrative taxes and the second injury fund surcharge in smaller 0.1% increments instead of 0.5%. The sponsor and the department said the change would better right-size collections and reduce the burden on employers; the Missouri Chamber also supported the bill as good governance. No opposition was presented, and the hearing on HB 2855 was closed. The committee then heard extensive testimony on HB 3142, a camp-safety bill prompted by the Camp Mystic flooding tragedy in Texas and a Missouri drowning case. The sponsor and multiple grieving parents urged mandatory emergency plans, staff training, background checks, licensing, weather warnings, and clearer oversight for summer camps. Supporters included the American Camp Association and some state and youth-safety advocates, while opponents—especially camp operators, the Missouri Afterschool Network, and park and recreation representatives—argued the bill was too broad, could burden day camps and church camps, and might worsen child-care shortages. Several witnesses suggested the bill should be narrowed to distinguish overnight residential camps from lower-risk day camps and possibly be housed under DSS rather than DESE. No vote was taken. Finally, the committee took testimony on HB 1893 and HB 2075, which would require sex-segregated multi-occupancy restrooms and locker rooms in private schools and public buildings, with enforcement tied to state funding in some cases. Sponsors said the bills were meant to create clear statewide standards and protect privacy and safety; opponents argued the measures would harm transgender and intersex people, be difficult or impossible to enforce, and create safety and discrimination problems. Supporters emphasized private-school autonomy and concerns about safety in shared facilities. The hearing concluded after extensive questioning, with no action or vote reported.

Transcript Highlights:

• It could be up to four months before we find a stable budget and balance that we can look forward to
• It could be up to four months before we find a stable budget and balance that we can look forward to
• It could be up to four months before we find a stable budget and balance that we can look forward to
• It could be up to four months before we find a stable budget and balance that we can look forward to
• It could be up to four months before we find a stable budget and balance that we can look forward to

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:10 SB 11 Discussion 00:01:20 SB 11 Vote 00:05:00 SB 41 Discussion 00:5:43 SB 41 Vote 00:15:03 SB 59 Discussion 00:20:30 SB 59 Vote 00:28:15 SB 57 Discussion 00:29:40 SB 57 Vote 00:40:00 SB 125 Discussion 00:42:43 SB 125 Vote 00:50:53 SB 191 Discussion 00:53:19 SB 191 Vote 00:59:38, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 11, a proposal to create a matching-grant program for neighborhood storm shelters in rural Kentucky. Sponsor Steve Meredith and supporters from the Kentucky League of Cities and the City of Morgantown said the idea was to use FEMA-style funding to help residents who live far from community shelters, noting that in some rural counties it can take 30 to 45 minutes to reach a shelter during severe weather. The committee adopted the substitute and passed the bill 11-0, with no nay votes. The committee then considered Senate Bill 41, which would require a ballot referendum whenever a taxing entity raises property taxes more than 4 percent, rather than relying on the current petition process. Sponsor Gary Boswell said the bill would give taxpayers more direct control and argued that local governments should simply avoid raising taxes above the threshold. Superintendents from Rockcastle and Casey counties opposed the bill, saying it would weaken local control, add election costs, delay budgets, and make it harder for school districts to keep up with inflation, insurance, transportation, and construction costs. After debate, the committee passed the bill 7-3 with favorable expression. Next, the committee heard Senate Bill 59, which would add criminal penalties to KRS 65.013, the law barring public funds from being used to advocate for or against ballot questions. Sponsor Steve Rawlings said the measure was prompted by reports of school officials using public resources to oppose a 2024 ballot issue and argued the law needs real enforcement to protect taxpayers and election integrity. Members raised concerns about First Amendment issues and the bill’s gray areas, especially for public employees speaking on their own time; Rawlings said the substitute removed volunteer references, allowed balanced issue debates, and clarified that employees acting on their own time and resources would not be prohibited. The committee passed the bill 8-3 with favorable expression. The committee also began hearing Senate Bill 57, as substituted, from Senator Danny Carroll. The bill would create a nuclear-ready site readiness pilot program under the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority, with up to three projects receiving up to $25 million each to help cover early site permitting and related licensing costs. Carroll, along with witnesses from the UK Center for Applied Energy Research and the Public Service Commission, said the goal is to build a nuclear energy ecosystem in Kentucky, with safeguards including surety bonds, deadlines, and cost-recovery provisions. The discussion was still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then what's the residual amount in terms of sending that balance?
• And then what's the residual amount in terms of sending that balance?
• So it's, it's whenever, Commissioner: In terms of sending that balance, whenever an account is right
• Otherwise, how do you balance the budget? That's right. So it's likely that's the case.
• So there's a lot on their plate, a lot to balance, and I just ask that you would respect that.

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 2401, which would require physicians to complete continuing education on nutrition and metabolic health as part of the state’s rural health transformation effort. HHS supported the bill, saying it would help physicians better address chronic disease and preserve federal grant points tied to the state’s application. A member of the public also testified in favor, arguing that better nutrition education could improve diabetes outcomes and reduce costs. The committee then adopted an amendment to add the Board of Occupational Therapy Practice to the background-check statute so the occupational therapy compact could proceed, and it passed the bill as amended on a roll call vote. The committee next heard House Bill 1621, which would require the Presidential Fitness Physical Fitness Test in elementary, middle, and high school physical education courses. HHS said the bill was part of the rural health transformation application and could help preserve federal funding, but members raised many questions about the test’s criteria, adaptive options for students with disabilities, equipment needs, and whether the bill should apply to non-public schools. Senator Clemens offered an amendment to limit the requirement to public schools, but it failed. Senator Hogan then offered an amendment to clarify exemptions and allow DPI to align implementation with federal guidance; that amendment passed. A further amendment adding language allowing DPI to establish criteria for and exceptions to the test also passed. The committee then approved the bill as amended on a roll call vote. The committee also considered House Bill 1622, which joins North Dakota to the physician assistant licensure compact. HHS said the compact would improve access to care, especially in rural areas, support military families, and help preserve rural health transformation funding. Members noted the compact had been discussed in a prior session and that many earlier concerns had been resolved. After brief discussion about the compact process and its consistency with other interstate compacts, the committee voted to do pass the bill. Finally, the committee began Senate Bill 2402, which expands pharmacists’ prescriptive authority and therapeutic substitution powers. HHS and the Board of Pharmacy supported the bill as a way to improve access to care and maintain rural health transformation funding. Senator Roers introduced a detailed amendment negotiated with the Board of Medicine and Board of Pharmacy to narrow and clarify the bill, including notification requirements, limits on certain drug categories, and patient-protection language for therapeutic substitution. The Board of Pharmacy then testified in support of the broader bill and explained the CLIA-waived testing provisions and the repeal of the older, narrower pharmacist-testing language. The hearing and amendment discussion were still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• That notwithstanding, because Texas has now shamelessly affected the national balance of power, our nation's
• My district is the most purple and balanced district in the state, so you should all be interested in
• Our system was built on checks and balances.
• Our system was built on checks and balances.
• And by doing that, we can have a balanced level playing field where every single person counts, and we

Summary: The Assembly met after a quorum call, recess, prayer, and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved into a highly procedural and contentious floor session centered on redistricting measures. Members debated a point of order raised by Assembly Member DeMaio challenging the constitutionality of SB 280, ACA 8, and AB 604; the Speaker ruled the point not well taken, and the Assembly sustained that ruling on appeal. The body also took up consent-calendar and procedural motions, including suspending rules to adopt late amendments on ACA 8 and to bring the measure up without reference to file. Several motions to re-refer or suspend rules on related measures failed, while the motion to adopt the late amendments on ACA 8 carried. The main substantive item was ACA 8, the Assembly Constitutional Amendment related to redistricting, presented by Assembly Member Berman as a response to mid-decade redistricting efforts in other states, especially Texas. Supporters argued the measure was a temporary, voter-driven response to protect democracy, counter partisan gerrymandering, and address broader threats tied to the Trump administration, including immigration enforcement and health care cuts. Opponents argued ACA 8 would undermine California’s independent citizens redistricting commission, violate the state Constitution, and amount to partisan gerrymandering or a power grab. Members on both sides framed the issue as a defense of democracy, but disagreed sharply over whether the Legislature should act or leave redistricting to voters and the existing commission. No final vote on ACA 8 is shown in the transcript excerpt, but the Assembly did vote on several procedural matters: the appeal of the Speaker’s ruling was sustained 58-18; the motion to adopt late amendments on ACA 8 passed 58-19; a motion to re-refer ACA 8 and SB 280 to Judiciary failed 19-58; and a motion to take up A.J.R. 21 without reference to file failed 19-58. The session remained focused on ACA 8 and related redistricting questions, with extensive floor speeches from both supporters and opponents.

Transcript Highlights:

• There is no balance in this bill for the most injured Texans because they're going to be deprived of
• She lost all, all five levels of balance.
• We should all be like for me, at least I have a balancing test.
• It also will, uh, leave patients with a higher risk of having a balance on their medical bill even after
• I don't know if you heard me earlier but this balancing act and so that's that's perfect.

Transcript Highlights:

• We're trying to weigh in on this and find the right balance of how to handle this.
• a 5 year safety inspection decal program linked to vessel registration to strike the appropriate balance
• So I see this bill is somewhat of a balanced solution because, again, it requires the documentation.
• to public to recreate get outdoors and enjoy Florida as we know and love the amendment strikes a balance
• and family law cases and insurance due process, protect the integrity of judicial appointments and balances

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But I think that, again, that we. to strike that right balance and that's what we're doing here.
• We believe that there is opportunity for balance, there's opportunity for blending the various needs
• That would allow for more balance being brought into the bill so that we could properly account for things
• And we think that together, that strikes the perfect balance.
• It's not lost on us that we must take a balanced approach to care for our youth and staff. while ensuring

Bills: HB31, HB3360

Keywords: juvenile justice, community supervision, felony offenses, treatment of children, juvenile facilities, chemical dispensing device, solitary confinement, rehabilitation, criminal proceedings, delinquency, 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• hours, and um, I'm not a parent with young children or who works during the day and is trying to balance
• hours, and um, I'm not a parent with young children or who works during the day and is trying to balance
• hours, and um, I'm not a parent with young children or who works during the day and is trying to balance
• hours, and um, I'm not a parent with young children or who works during the day and is trying to balance
• Children or who works during the day and is trying to balance work and child care, and I think that this

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 42.240><c> that</c><00:45:42.400><c> you</c><00:45:42.599><c> hand</c><00:45:43.440><c> count</c> balance
• that you hand count balance that you hand count um<00:45:46.040><c> the</c><00:45:46.240><c> smaller
• processing seen with these low limits on processing of<01:31:28.800><c> absentee</c><01:31:29.320><c> balance
• > the</c><01:31:30.119><c> one</c><01:31:30.360><c> that</c><01:31:31.320><c> did</c> of absentee balance
• is the one that did of absentee balance is the one that did come<01:31:31.719><c> into</c><01:31:32.119

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We just wanted to point out that we have been tracking the balance in the deposit beverage special fund
• We just wanted to point out that we have been tracking the balance in the deposit beverage special fund
• We just wanted to point out that we have been tracking the balance in the deposit beverage special fund
• We just wanted to point out that we have been tracking the balance in the deposit beverage special fund
• We just wanted to point out that we have been tracking the balance in the deposit beverage special fund

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to cesspools, Red Hill cleanup, water testing, environmental governance, and beverage container recycling. For SB 472, SB 501, SB 675, and SB 958 on cesspools, most testimony supported accelerating cesspool conversion and expanding Department of Health capacity, though the Attorney General flagged a single-subject issue on SB 472 and the Department of Health and others raised concerns about funding, program structure, and coordination. Supporters emphasized cesspools as a major water pollution source and urged earlier deadlines, while some testimony questioned the tax credit approach and asked for clearer grant and staffing language. For SB 639 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill cleanup, the Department of Health asked for clearer cleanup standards and noted limits on laboratory detection and sampling, while supporters argued the bill would create a binding legal standard for remediation and help prevent reopening of the facility. Testimony also stressed the need to remove all contamination to the extent practicable and protect aquifers and drinking water. SB 664 on water quality testing drew strong support from residents and water advocates, but the Department of Health warned the measure could duplicate existing authority and create significant cost; the Board of Water Supply supported the concept while noting it would expand responsibilities into private-property testing. SB 674 on environmental advisory council and waste reduction received mixed testimony: supporters said it would help address landfill siting and protect water resources, while industry groups requested changes to advisory council membership and exemptions for certain products, and one witness opposed the measure. For SB 1067 on deposit beverage container recycling, the Attorney General said the grant language may be constitutionally problematic because it lacks standards, while industry testimony both supported the recycling goals and asked for amendments, including broader representation on the advisory council and clearer treatment of compostable and packaging-related issues. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion provided.