Video & Transcript Research : 'Exec Sessions'
Page 24 of 500
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- You know, you're not... ...discussing before we went into this executive session.
- Motion to move out of exec? Oh, there is a...
- Motion to move out of exec? Oh, there is a...
- Motion to move out of exec? Is there a second? Yes. Taking it up, I will all say aye. This thing...
- :45:01.559>
out <00:45:01.680>of out motion to move out of out motion to move out of exec
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (04/09/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- But if anybody be appropriate to exec.
- But anybody has any objection to execing 146? Yeah.
- to have a session a house session<05:04:57.920>
full <05:04:58.160>house <05:04:58.320>< - some or all of the bills we have to exec some or all of the bills we have to exec<05:05:20.718>
next - exec next Wednesday. exec next Wednesday.
Summary:
The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 146, which would remove the requirement that a medical examiner physically view a body before issuing a cremation certificate. The prime sponsor, Sen. Suprentice, and Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Jenny Duval explained that the bill would not change the death certificate process or the existing waiting period before cremation; it would only eliminate the in-person viewing step. They said the current review of death certificates already catches the vast majority of cases that should be reported to the medical examiner, and that the physical view changes outcomes in less than 1% of cremation cases.
The witnesses emphasized that the bill is intended to improve efficiency and reduce delays for families and funeral homes, while freeing deputy medical examiners to focus on homicides, suicides, accidents, and unexpected natural deaths. Dr. Duval cited an example where review of a death certificate, not the body, uncovered a long-ago strangulation-related homicide, arguing that the key safeguard is review of records and cause of death, not the physical view. She also said the change would save travel time and some costs for the department.
Committee members asked about how death certificates list primary and contributing causes of death, whether the low percentage of findings means the current process has a deterrent effect, why cremation is treated differently from burial, and whether identification concerns are adequately addressed. The sponsors responded that identification is handled earlier by hospitals, families, and funeral directors, and that any questionable identification would already fall under medical examiner jurisdiction. They also said the bill would not alter the two-day cremation delay or other existing safeguards. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (11/12/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- And I would like to open up the exec And I would like to open up the exec session<00:40:27.359><
- Um, so the uh exec session for amendment HP for uh HP396 is closed and I want to thank the committee
- Um so<01:13:54.960>
the <01:13:55.600>uh <01:13:57.040>exec <01:13:57.440>session - <01:13:58.080>
for <01:13:58.480>amendment <01:13:58.960>HP so the uh exec session - for amendment HP so the uh exec session for amendment HP uh<01:13:59.679>
for <01:14:00.159>
Summary:
The Environment and Agriculture Committee held a work session and then executive session on HB 396, which would allow processing of beef cows, swine, sheep, and goats at facilities not certified by USDA. Representative Comtois presented a revised amendment after prior drafting issues were corrected. The changes narrowed the bill to cuts of meat rather than meat food products, clarified labeling for amenable and non-amenable species, removed an exemption from federal law, struck a seasonal date range at Representative Bixby’s request, and reinstated a previously removed section. Supporters said the amendment now had clearer language and better safeguards, while some members still expressed reservations about the underlying policy.
Testimony from DHHS food safety officials emphasized that the department does not inspect custom-exempt facilities and would have little oversight unless there were a complaint or foodborne outbreak. They noted concerns about removing the September 1 to April 30 date range, explaining it had been included in the original bill because of temperature and storage concerns for large animals, and they also said the amendment appeared to focus documentation requirements on bison, elk, and red deer. Committee members and witnesses debated whether the proposal would create food safety risks, whether farmers should instead be educated and helped to aggregate processing capacity, and whether the bill would expose farmers, retailers, and restaurants to federal enforcement risk.
Rob Johnson of the New Hampshire Farm Bureau said the organization had recently voted down a policy opposing state regulations that would allow uninspected meat sales at retail, and he said he needed to consult further with Farm Bureau leadership before taking a position on HB 396. He suggested the bill should use the broader term “dairy and beef cattle” rather than “beef cows” for consistency. Supporters argued the bill would help small farmers, expand local food access, and reflect an intrastate policy choice despite conflict with federal law. The committee then moved into executive session and voted to approve amendment 2025-3090H, with members stating they would likely have different views on the bill itself.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Energy and Natural Resources (05/13/2025)
Energy and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- Motion to exec. All in favor of motion to move remove exec. I... I... I... post none.
- <00:43:47.520>
Motion <00:43:47.760>to <00:43:48.319>exec. - Motion to exec. All in favor we're done. Motion to exec.
- /c><00:43:50.880>
to <00:43:51.200>move <00:43:51.800>remove <00:43:52.800>exec - I I I of motion to move remove exec. I I I post<00:43:56.000>
none.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (01/29/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- The next Thursday, the 6th, is a session day.
- We still—well, we will, you know, in terms of this committee, we will have our exec session tomorrow,
- We still—well, we will, you know, in terms of this committee, we will have our exec session tomorrow,
- the next Thursday the 6th is a session the next Thursday the 6th is a session day that's<04:38:43.279
- this committee we will have our exec this committee we will have our exec session<04:39:16.400><
Summary:
The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 552, which would remove the “full-time student” requirement for children ages 19 to 25 covered under the state retiree health insurance plan. The prime sponsor said the change would align retiree coverage with state employee and ACA plans, would not cost taxpayers because retirees pay the premiums, and could even reduce administrative burden and possibly state costs. The chair noted the bill simply removes the words “if full-time student” from statute and said the proposal affects very few retirees and has no cost to the state. No opposition was presented, and the chair closed the hearing on HB 552 after no further testimony.
The committee then opened a public hearing on House Bill 648, which would require commercial insurance coverage for glucose monitoring devices and supplies for people with diabetes. The prime sponsor, a retired dietitian and diabetes educator, gave extensive testimony describing diabetes as common, costly, and serious, and argued that continuous glucose monitoring is important for managing type 2 and gestational diabetes, preventing hypoglycemia, and improving safety and decision-making. She said CGMs can alert users to dangerous blood sugar changes, help people understand how food, activity, and medication affect glucose, and save lives while offering a strong return on investment.
During questions, a committee member asked whether the bill should specify that the monitoring be tied to prescribed treatment, and the sponsor agreed that adding “prescribed” would be appropriate. The member also asked about the proper threshold for coverage and whether the bill should be tied to fasting-test diagnosis; the sponsor responded that A1C is only one measure of control and does not show daily fluctuations, and said she was not prepared to recommend a specific threshold but could provide clinical guidelines later. No vote was taken during the hearing, and the sponsor indicated support for the bill’s general approach to broader CGM access.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Energy and Natural Resources (04/01/2025)
Energy and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- Move to exec. We have all right. All in favor? I. Consent. I'll second. All in favor? I. Uh, sorry.
- Well, I'm willing to offer you a motion to go to exec. I'll move to go to an exec. I'll second.
- So I will accept a motion to come out of exec. So moved and seconded. All in favor say I. I.
- We are I'm not going<02:06:20.080>
to <02:06:20.320>exec <02:06:20.719>any <02:06 - come out of exec. So moved and seconded. come out of exec. So moved and seconded.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Resources, Recreation and Development (02/04/2026)
Resources, Recreation and Development
Transcript Highlights:
- I'll close the exact session.
- exec on this?
- uh, quite a bit this session already. uh, quite a bit this session already.
- The chair said they had executed it and closed the exec session.
- So, I'll close the exec We executed it. So, I'll close the exec session. session. session.
Summary:
The committee first took up HB 163FN, dealing with requiring current, verifiable evidence of a species’ presence before land-use restrictions are imposed for habitat protection. Members discussed an amendment that had been worked on with agencies and stakeholder groups. Fish and Game testified that, while the amendment improved the bill, the agency still opposed it because of concerns about citizen science, how the proposal would apply to public versus private property, and how the transition to DES would work. Representative Darby argued the amendment was ambiguous, lacked a full hearing, and did not clearly address record verification or private-property access issues. The amendment passed 8-7, and the committee then voted OTPA 8-7, with a minority report noted.
The committee then moved to HB 1752FN, which would create a chain of custody for timber and carbon credits. Representative Davis presented an amendment saying it would help law enforcement investigate timber theft and add transparency to New Hampshire’s carbon registry by identifying buyers of carbon credits. Supporters said the change would impose little burden and align with practices in other states. Opponents, including Representative Darby, Representative Vale, and the state forester from DNCR, said the carbon market is complex, the amendment was not fully vetted, and a hearing with all stakeholders was needed; they also raised fiscal-note concerns. The amendment passed 8-7, and the committee then voted OTPA 8-7, again with a minority report.
Finally, the committee opened a hearing on HB 1019, which would add an active water treatment professional to the state water well board. Representative Peter Petrino and Representative Wendy Thomas said the board should include expertise on contamination risks and treatment technologies, citing concerns about arsenic, radon, and PFAS in private wells. The chairman of the Water Well Board testified in opposition to the bill as drafted, saying the board supports the general idea of licensing water filtration work but does not currently have authority or rules to oversee that field and believes the proposal would put “the cart before the horse.” Members questioned whether the board’s current mandate even covers filtration systems, and the discussion ended with those concerns unresolved.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (04/14/2025)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- So let's get started with the existing exec sessions.
- our exec sessions. our exec sessions.
- Next, we'll open an exec session along.
- session on Senate Bill exec session on Senate Bill 108.<02:23:18.319>
And <02:23:18.560>I< - And I and exec session earlier today.
Summary:
The committee met on April 14 and began by welcoming a new member, Representative Samban Denier, who briefly described his background as a Clarkson University environmental engineering graduate and Air Force veteran. The committee then moved into a work session on five energy-related bills, starting with Senate Bill 65 on stormwater management for solar arrays. Representative McGee presented amendment 1594H, which would exclude projects in shoreland areas from the bill’s permit-by-notification process and require the standard alteration-of-terrain permit review instead. Members asked for clarification, and McGee explained the amendment was requested by the New Hampshire Lakes Association and others to preserve the fuller review process for shoreland projects. The committee appeared satisfied with the explanation and moved on.
The committee next discussed Senate Bill 230 on electric utility restructuring and investment in distributed energy resources. Members concluded that section one was unnecessary because a better definition of advanced nuclear resources had already been added to House Bill 710, and that section two would allow investment in advanced nuclear resources in a way they had already rejected in another bill due to ratepayer risk. Several members agreed the bill was redundant and supported an ITL motion. They also discussed Senate Bill 232 on net metering terms and conditions, focusing first on whether hydroelectric generators could be listed in ISO New England while also taking net metering credits. Granite State Hydropower Association representative Heidi Kroll testified that generators are subject to checks and balances, that double-dipping is not occurring, and that rules and tariffs already require participation in one market arrangement or the other.
Discussion on Senate Bill 232 then shifted to section two, which would bar retroactive changes to net metering tariffs in place as of January 1, 2025. Representative McGee proposed alternative language to protect existing customer generators, group hosts, and municipal hosts from retroactive changes, while others said the language was needed to provide stability for current participants operating on thin margins. Some members supported the clearer wording; others argued the committee should not tie the hands of the PUC and DOE, noting future circumstances could require regulatory flexibility and that conflicts could be resolved in court if necessary. The committee did not take a final vote in the portion of the meeting provided, and the discussion was still ongoing when the transcript ended.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Energy and Natural Resources (03/04/2025)
Energy and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- Did we vote going into exec? I don’t think we did. Did we? Yeah, we did. Yes, we did.
- We voted on it, second to go to exec session. Okay, I remember.
- session.
- All right, our chair is back, so I’m turning exec session over to him.
- All right, I've got to go introduce a bill, so is there a motion to move out as exec?
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- So, in the work session, I'd love to hear a little bit more about the work session that you had and the
- how that worked out in the work session? how that worked out in the work session?
- We can take a five minute break session.
- I I don't I had I just want to exec?
- Yep. but I am not prepared to exec anything but I am not prepared to exec anything else<02:02:43.760>
HI
Keywords:
HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u1UJ3OLXBU, 2026-07-02T01:23:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_04-08-26_2_.PDF
Followed by FIN 1:56 PM Agenda:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_04-08-26_3_.PDF
Then followed by FIN 1:57 PM Agenda:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_04-08-26_4_.PDF
Then followed by FIN 2:00 PM Agenda:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_04-08-26_.PDF
Timestamps:
9:18 - Introduction (FIN 1:55PM)
9:51 - HCR93 HD1 / HR85 HD1
12:43 - HCR14
13:30 - Decision Making (FIN 1:55PM)
------
17:53 - Introduction (FIN 1:56PM)
18:04 - Decision Making (FIN 1:56PM) (measures previously heard on Thursday, April 2, 2026 at 2:00PM)
------
22:14 - Introduction (FIN 2:00PM)
23:05 - Decision Making (FIN 1:57PM) (measure previously heard on Tuesday, Apri7 2, 2026 at 2:00PM)
------
28:00 - Introduction (FIN 2:00PM)
28:18 - SB2320 SD1 HD1
29:10 - SB2138 HD1
30:45 - SB2075 SD1 HD1
32:34 - SB2353 SD2 HD1
51:55 - SB2657 SD1 HD1
55:58 - SB2340 SD2 HD1
57:09 - SB3245 SD1 HD1
1:03:01 - SB2057 SD2 HD2
1:06:26 - SB3040 SD1 HD1
1:10:12 - SB2014 SD1 HD1
1:28:11 - SB2645 SD3 HD1
1:30:19 - SB3109 SD1 HD1
1:31:01 - SB2698 SD2 HD1
1:33:45 - SB3048 SD1 HD1
1:37:08 - SB2367 SD2 HD1
1:39:59 - SB17 SD2 HD1
1:48:37 - Decision Making (FIN 2:00PM), 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- That is where we're sort of faced with a budget issue this particular session.
- So I hope that we're able to do that this legislative session. So, Mr...
- I would like to see this done this session as well.
- That the exec will sign that we may not get at all this year.
- But we've got to fix this this session. Any closing remarks, Sonny?
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Do I have a motion to go into executive session? So moved.
- I have a motion and a second to go into executive session. All those in favor say aye. Aye.
- We are in executive session.
- Do I have a motion to come out of executive session?
- All those in favor of coming out of executive session say aye. All those opposed say nay.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 24th, 2026 at 01:46 pm
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- I don't have any legislation this year because it's a 30-day legislative session, but I was up in Colorado
- And the exec came in at one and a half. And how much of a balance do you have?
- So does the, And the exec came in at one and a half. And how much of a balance do you have?
- So does the balance that you have, plus the one and a half from the exec, make up the 3.5?
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (02/18/2026)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Seeing none, I will take a motion to go to exec. I will take a motion to go to exec. All in favor?
- I make a motion to go into exec. I make a motion to go into exec.
- , New Hampshire legislative session, New Hampshire legislative session, uh there<02:00:14.239>
- Make a motion going to exec. >> All in favor?
- exec. So hope so. exec. So hope so.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- I'd entertain a motion to go into executive session.
- to go into executive session. All those in favor say aye. All those opposed say nay.
- The ayes have it; we are in executive session. We have one bill left, Senate Bill 275.
- In executive session, we allow members to ask... Thank you.
- Seeing none, motion to come out of executive session.
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Select Committee on Pension Policy Oct 21st, 2025
Select Committee on Pension Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- if either of those topics proceed during the legislative session.
- I also bumped the 2026 session prep to December.
- Everyone’s nodding their heads in agreement. 26 session prep.
- I would love to receive an email for the 2026 session prep.
- Everyone's nodding their heads in agreement. 26 session prep.
Summary:
The Select Committee on Pension Policy Executive Committee approved the September minutes and received updates on two court cases, Fowler and Dolan. Staff explained that Fowler concerns interest calculations for members who transferred from Plan 2 to Plan 3 before 2002; the Ninth Circuit has already found liability, and the remaining issue is damages, which could be significant depending on the expert-driven calculation. Dolan was described as quieter, with briefing completed at the Court of Appeals and oral argument possible later this year or early next year.
The committee also heard an actuarial update on the interim work plan, including planned informational briefings on month-of-death policy, a Plan 1 ad hoc COLA, and the OSA demographic experience study, which is still under external audit. Members asked whether updated fiscal notes had been prepared for two bills under study; staff said preliminary analysis had been done and full updates would come if the bills move forward. The committee then discussed how to handle the ad hoc COLA item and agreed to have staff draft a letter endorsing House Bill 1474 and any similar Senate bill for a one-year ad hoc COLA, to be brought back for full committee consideration in November.
Staff reviewed the draft November and December work plan. The committee adopted the November agenda, which includes annual updates from the State Investment Board and Retirement Systems, the left one study closeout, and the ad hoc COLA action item. Members also discussed whether excess compensation and 2026 session prep should be handled by email rather than in a meeting, with general agreement to move the session prep to electronic communication and possibly handle excess compensation as an informational item, depending on availability. Constituent correspondence included several messages on climate change and Plan 1 COLAs, including support for the merger bill and COLAs in general. Jacob White of the LEOFF 2 Board reported that the board had only held an educational briefing on excess compensation and overtime, found the data limited, and took no further action. The meeting ended with thanks to staff and an adjournment vote.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Energy and Natural Resources (03/11/2025)
Energy and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- Do you want to wait for Mark to get here before we exec this? I may cross paths.
- All right, so is there a motion to move into exec?
- Do we have anything else that we need to exec today?
- Actually, did a great job, so we're not going to exec this one today.
- We'll look at this next week, and we actually executive session by Senator Ral.
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- Tickets to the next session next week as well for webcast number one and a half.
- We identified a location a couple of sessions ago.
- I mentioned the capital outlay from a couple of sessions ago, $10 million.
- Some of them apply to this session and some for future sessions.
- That would be a project for reauthorization this session, wouldn't it?
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- I would also propose to exec House Bill 1550 and House Bill 1416 and House Bill 1456.
- I would also propose to exec House Bill 1550 and House Bill 1416 and House Bill 1456.
- I would also propose to exec House Bill 1550 and House Bill 1416 and House Bill 1456.
- Next, I'm going to close the executive session on 1489 and open the executive session on House Bill 1127
- Um, last, I would like to close the executive session on House Bill 1550 and open the executive session