Transcript Highlights:

• At the appropriate time, I would respectfully ask for an aye vote.
• I'll move the bill at the appropriate time. Thank you.
• In fact, I've never advanced any legislation and never intend to.
• So at the appropriate time, I respectfully request an aye vote. Thank you. All right, thank you.
• Always want to perfect whatever legislation has my name on it.

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on AI, privacy, and surveillance. SB 903 would prohibit AI from independently providing psychotherapy or presenting itself as a licensed mental health provider, require disclosure and informed consent, and reinforce confidentiality and privacy protections for therapy records. Supporters, including a mother and therapist whose son died by suicide after extensive chats with ChatGPT, argued the bill is needed to prevent harmful, crisis-related interactions. Behavioral health groups and labor/privacy organizations supported the measure, while TechNet, the California Medical Association, and the California Hospital Association opposed unless amended, saying the bill could restrict useful clinical tools and create conflicts around triage, screening, and data use. The committee passed SB 903 4-0 to Appropriations, with members noting the need for further work on definitions and implementation. SB 1119 would create a broader framework for chatbot safety for children, including annual risk assessments, crisis response protocols, default child protections, parental controls, notice and time limits, restrictions on advertising and use of children’s data, incident reporting, audits, and a private right of action. The author and supporters again cited the death of Adam Raine as evidence that chatbots can reinforce suicidal ideation and isolate children. Common Sense Media and several labor and privacy groups supported the bill. CalChamber, TechNet, the California State Sheriffs’ Association, and other industry and local government groups opposed unless amended, raising concerns about vague standards, overlap with SB 243, prescriptive design mandates, and litigation risk. The committee approved SB 1119 4-0 to Judiciary, with amendments to be taken there. The committee also heard SB 1013, which would tighten rules for automated license plate reader data by requiring DOJ audits, employee training, and a 30-day retention limit for most data. Supporters said the bill responds to documented misuse and over-retention of data that mostly belongs to innocent drivers. Law enforcement groups opposed, arguing the retention limit would hinder investigations and reduce the usefulness of ALPRs in serious or delayed cases. The bill passed 4-1 to Appropriations. SB 1292, a local control bill for six cities, would allow camera or sensor-based enforcement of curb and loading zones, with a human reviewing each violation before issuance. Supporters said it would help cities manage congestion and unsafe blocking of bike lanes and loading zones; privacy advocates warned about expanding automated surveillance. It passed 4-1 to Appropriations. Finally, the committee heard SB 1101, which would require higher education institutions to notify students, faculty, and staff when personal information is shared with federal agencies and limit disclosure to what is legally required. Supporters framed it as a transparency and anti-doxing measure in response to recent federal investigations and subpoenas; there was no opposition testimony. The bill passed 5-0 to Appropriations. The committee then began hearing SB 951, the California Worker Technological Displacement Act, which would require advance notice and reporting when employers displace workers due to technology and give displaced workers priority for openings, but the transcript cuts off before the hearing concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• And we therefore urge you to support this legislation. Thank you.
• And we therefore urge you to support this legislation. Thank you. Don Bustos. Unmute yourself.
• We think it's more efficient than trying to go and hit-and-miss request for capital outlay.
• And I know the acequia people work through capital requests and other fundings that are available.
• So currently in HB 2, there is a $9 million appropriation, special appropriation, to go into the Irrigation

Bills: SB193

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects, 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I bring that up because this bill has appropriations, and with the lack of federal funding or the
• item at the food bank and one requested item at the food bank and is<00:14:34.399><c> the</c><00:14:
• I just requested it. Thanks.
• </c><00:50:57.240><c> that</c> would like to respectfully request that would like to respectfully request
• </c><01:09:53.359><c> funds</c> HD1 uh requiring and appropriating funds HD1 uh requiring and appropriating

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1294 HD2, which would create a workforce housing working group within the Department of Agriculture to address agricultural workforce housing shortages. The Department of Agriculture supported the bill’s intent but emphasized that the first step should be a study to determine actual housing demand, noting many farmers have very low incomes and may not be able to support housing costs. A DHHL representative said the department supports the measure as a first step but does not currently plan to expand housing on its agricultural lands; members also discussed the distinction between agricultural and pastoral leases and asked for follow-up information on lease numbers and ranchers growing feed. Testimony on HB 1294 was overwhelmingly supportive, with farm and farmers’ organizations saying housing is critical to sustaining agriculture and should be located near farm operations when possible. Members questioned how housing eligibility would be enforced and whether federal housing funds could be used. The committee reported 38 testimonies in support, none opposed, and two comments, then voted to pass HB 1294 HD2 with amendments, including a date defect to July 1, 2050; the motion carried with five in favor and the recommendations were adopted. The committee then took up HB 428 HD1, establishing the Hawaii Farm to Families Program to address food shortages and requiring reports before the 2026 regular session. The Department of Agriculture urged the bill’s continuation and appropriations, citing rescinded federal grant programs and a planned $1.1 million application to support food banks and kalo production. Food banks, the Hawaii Farm Bureau, the Hawaii Farmers Union, and other groups strongly supported the measure, describing rising demand for charitable food assistance, especially for fresh produce and protein, and noting that many families are struggling despite working multiple jobs. Witnesses also described school pantry and backpack programs, food rescue partnerships with retailers, and the need for more stable state support; one witness asked for at least $5 million in funding for farm families. Committee members asked about food insecurity levels, food safety, abuse of food assistance, and how the program would connect farmers with schools and food banks. Food bank representatives said they already work with DOE school pantry programs and inspect all donated food for safety, and they suggested a grant or escrow-style payment model could help farmers by reducing reimbursement delays. The transcript does not show a final vote on HB 428 before the excerpt ends.

Transcript Highlights:

• The fellow is appropriate. Anyone tired? The fellow is appropriate.
• That is not appropriate.
• Is that appropriate? Is that appropriate for little kids to see?
• You think that's appropriate to hide from parents?
• It's the legislation says $5 billion.

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, offered an invocation, led the pledges, and approved a series of routine motions, including excusing absent members and granting permission for several committees to meet while the House was in session. Members also adopted several memorial and recognition resolutions, including H.R. 1023 honoring Christian Beerbill, H.R. 1033 recognizing International Bereaved Mother’s Day, and H.R. 877 recognizing Urban League Advocates Day. The House also recommitted SB 17 and HB 4211 to committee and postponed SCR 27 and HB 2145 for later consideration. The chamber then took up a long third-reading calendar of bills covering a wide range of topics, including Sunset review measures, health care workforce and pricing, child custody and family law, Medicaid, rural ambulance grants, energy reporting, public information requests, trail development, virtual meeting disruptions, occupational licensing, protective orders, county leave pools, animal cruelty, infrastructure, and higher education. Most bills were explained briefly by their authors and passed with broad support, though several drew notable opposition, including HB 5265, HB 2402, HB 3000, HB 3237, HB 3326, HB 1056, HB 281, HB 3308, HB 1043, HB 1234, HB 1193, HB 294, HB 809, HB 334, HB 2037, HB 285, HB 1353, HB 3960, HB 4044, HB 4264, HB 2807, HB 3349, HB 4406, HB 1593, HB 1899, HB 1201, and others. Several bills prompted extended debate or amendments. HB 3237, extending public energy-use reporting for state and higher-education buildings, passed after questions about its public-sector-only scope and energy savings. HB 3326, addressing public service loan forgiveness credit for adjunct professors, initially failed on a 69-70 vote but later passed after verification and machine corrections. HB 3211, concerning optometrists in managed care plans, adopted a Buckley amendment before passing. HB 2213 on Texas Windstorm Insurance Association board composition adopted a Metcalf amendment requiring certain board members to be Texas residents. HB 412, dealing with harmful materials and sexual performance of a child, generated extensive questioning about its scope, existing legal standards, and effects on educators and medical professionals; the excerpt ends during that debate.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then a legislative leadership fellow, that's Aggie.
• And then a legislative leadership fellow, that's Aggie.
• And this request went through the unified budget process.
• We go to our business introduction of legislation.
• Introduction of legislation. The reader will read.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It does not appropriate any money.
• Again, you didn't need legislation. You went through it.
• Again, nothing in this bill appropriates any funds.
• It does say subject to legislative appropriation within the bill. Lifeline. Okay.
• I think all of that is incredibly appropriate.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first recognized and thanked a page, Jonathan, for his service, then approved the March 2, 2026 minutes. Members reviewed committee procedures and then took up Senate Bill 1419, the Idaho Child Care Program. Representative Jordan Redmond presented the bill as a policy measure to codify the child care assistance program, tighten eligibility, add work and income requirements, reduce assets limits, strengthen fraud detection and enforcement, require provider registration, and sunset the program in 2028. Department of Health and Welfare Director Juliet Sharon said the department’s 360 review had already led to administrative action against 28 providers and explained that the bill would add tools such as clearer provider requirements and concurrent jurisdiction for the Attorney General to pursue criminal fraud cases. Testimony on SB 1419 was sharply divided. Supporters, including the Foundation for Government Accountability and some child care users and providers, said the bill would improve program integrity, protect taxpayer funds, and preserve access through a regulated system rather than a ban. Opponents, including Idaho Voices for Children, a foster parent advocate, and several child care providers, argued the bill was not a clean transfer from rule to statute, could create gaps in eligibility and rulemaking, could impose costly audit requirements on nonprofits, and might harm foster family access and affordability. After discussion, Senator Lenney moved to send SB 1419 to the floor with a due pass recommendation; the motion passed 6-4, with Senators Bjerke, Blaylock, Van Orden, and Lenney voting aye, and Senators Zuiderveld, Wintrow, and Shippey voting nay. The committee then began hearing Senate Bill 1418, a kratom regulation bill. Senator Tammy Nichols said the bill would distinguish natural kratom from adulterated or synthetic products, set limits on 7-hydroxymitragynine, require testing and labeling, restrict sales to adults 21 and older, and give the state enforcement tools while avoiding a full ban. Testimony was also divided: toxicologists, an addiction medicine specialist, and several users supported regulation as a safer alternative to prohibition, while an emergency physician, a bereaved parent, and law enforcement representatives urged a ban or opposed the bill, citing addiction, overdose, local control, and enforcement and lab-cost concerns. The committee did not finish action on SB 1418 and discussed continuing testimony, including possibly hearing more witnesses later.

Transcript Highlights:

• , non-legislators.
• Legislative Management.
• But the only thing that those requested of Legislative Council, according to the minutes, was a bill
• And if you timely filed a brief requesting a hearing... ...requesting a hearing.
• So the final motion would be that legislative council staff be requested to prepare a final report and

Summary: The Child Custody Review Task Force met with a quorum, approved the prior minutes, and then took up draft legislation to create a future interim committee to study the feasibility of a family court in North Dakota. Beth outlined the draft’s purpose, proposed 15-member membership, and the study topics, including constitutional authority, court structure, jurisdiction, fiscal impact, implementation, and possible phased-in approaches. Members discussed committee composition at length, ultimately agreeing to keep the committee at 15 by reducing legislative members from eight to six, adding two judges from different judicial districts, two family law section members with rural/urban representation, one parent subject to a custody order, and a clerk of court representative; the self-help, mental health, and domestic violence positions were debated, with domestic violence advocacy retained and some other positions removed or replaced. The committee also agreed to include analysis of state and local fiscal impacts and efficiencies, and to keep the provision on procedural rules in the draft. The revised draft was approved and recommended to Legislative Management, with one recorded no vote from Judge Hovey after the fact. The committee then turned to a second draft dealing with mandatory participation in a family transition program in contested parental-rights cases. Members first clarified that the term should be changed to a more general “parenting education course,” rather than a named private program, and discussed whether the bill should also require education about court process and family-law procedures. Some members argued the bill should specify content such as co-parenting, parental alienation, harassment, disorderly conduct, removal of a child from the jurisdiction, and contempt consequences, while others objected that the proposal was too vague, could impose costs without clear limits or waivers, and might amount to compelled legal advice or an undefined private program. Several members said the bill needed more specificity before it could be presented, and the discussion became increasingly divided over whether to keep the draft at all. The transcript ends amid that debate, with no final action yet taken on the second draft.

Transcript Highlights:

• Same requests for members, um, so that we can move efficiently through our agenda today.
• The BASC screening tool is part of that screening process, if appropriate.
• </c> seriously and provide the appropriate seriously and provide the appropriate response<00:49:27.200
• It’s not appropriate in this setting. Any other testifiers for HB 1346?
• </c> cost it takes to acquire trro we request cost it takes to acquire trro we request that<01:19:41.400

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Education met on January 30 and heard testimony on several bills, beginning with an announcement asking testifiers and members to keep remarks brief because of weather. The vice chair also explained that HB 440, relating to immigration issues in schools and state hospitals, was removed from the agenda because the proposal would not create meaningful legal protections and immigration policy is governed by federal law. The committee then moved through a series of education-related measures, with testimony largely from the Department of Education, the School Facilities Authority, the Attorney General’s office, unions, advocacy groups, and individual testifiers. On HB 330, concerning school impact fees, the School Facilities Authority supported the bill as aligning policy with implementation, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii said the fee accounts have accumulated large balances, including more than $20 million in impact fee funds and nearly $9 million from predecessor fair-share contributions, and urged that collected money be used rather than left idle. DOE said it would follow up on the balance and why it was not being used. On HB 1188, dealing with workforce housing, DOE and the Charter School Commission offered comments or support, the Attorney General suggested clarifying the phrase “within commuting distance” by using a mileage standard and adding repayment language, and HSTA, HGEA, and others supported the bill, with HSTA saying teachers need housing to be able to live and work in Hawaii. On HB 624 and HB 625, both related to school psychologists, DOE said it would participate in a work group on the pathway bill and supported the incentive program bill; school psychologists and related groups supported the measures, while one testifier said DOE should not lead the work group alone because school psychologists may work in many education settings beyond DOE schools. The committee also heard HB 1314 on youth mental health in schools. DOE described its student support process, universal screening tools, and behavioral health services, saying schools already identify and respond to concerns and that staff are trained to report issues, while the Attorney General warned the bill could expose schools to liability and recommended a broad liability waiver. Testimony was mixed, with several supporters and one opponent. On HB 616, concerning school safety and harassment protections for educational workers, the Attorney General sought clarifying amendments on harassment definitions, temporary restraining order costs, and paid leave, while HSTA, HGEA, and individual teachers strongly supported the bill, describing harassment incidents and arguing for a standardized statewide response. DOE said it already has reporting pathways, visitor codes of conduct, trespass notices, and an ethics hotline, but acknowledged implementation varies by school and that staff can escalate concerns if needed. The committee also began hearing HB 88 on a three-year pilot program for athletic travel, but the transcript cuts off before that bill’s testimony is completed or any votes are taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> included those adopted in legislation included those adopted in legislation that<00:34:32.720><c
• Uh, this is our legislative intent.
• Uh, this is our legislative intent.
• . appropriations. appropriations.
• </c> requested a committee of conference. requested a committee of conference.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> manager</c><00:42:31.599><c> for</c> I'm the legislative policy manager for I'm the legislative
• Um, and also the request to push this back the implementation back one year was another request from
• Um, and also the request to push this back the implementation back one year was another request from
• Um, and also the request to push this back the implementation back one year was another request from
• And this the appropriate location.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• These actions actually disrupted the legislative hearing.
• That's a request by the opposition.
• That might not be an appropriate limit.
• The motion is due pass to appropriation, Carrillo. with the Appropriations Committee, Secretary, please
• We think that would still be appropriate.

Summary: The committee first heard SB 753, which would modernize California’s shopping cart recovery rules by allowing cities and counties to return abandoned carts directly to retailers, recover documented retrieval costs, and avoid the current impound-and-wait process. The author and supporters, including San Jose officials and the League of California Cities, said the bill would help clear streets, sidewalks, and waterways and reduce local costs. Grocers and retailers opposed the measure unless amended, arguing it would turn cart retrieval into a new cost burden and could create incentives for cities to charge too much for stolen property. After extensive discussion about notice periods, cost caps, and local ordinances, the committee adopted amendments and passed the bill 6-0 as amended. The committee then took up SB 445, which would speed up permitting and approvals needed for high-speed rail by requiring early engagement, setting rules for third-party coordination, and creating a dispute-resolution process. The author said the bill was narrowed from an earlier, broader transit proposal and was intended to reduce delays caused by utilities, local governments, and other entities. Supporters said permitting bottlenecks add major costs and delays to infrastructure projects, while opponents from utilities, cities, counties, telecoms, and special districts raised concerns about safety, reliability, affordability, and the need to review the pending amendments. The bill passed 8-1 to the Utilities and Energy Committee. The committee also heard SB 9, a narrower housing bill focused on accessory dwelling units. The author explained that it would require local ADU ordinances to be submitted to HCD for review and would make state standards control if a local agency fails to submit a compliant ordinance or respond to HCD findings. Supporters from housing and YIMBY groups said the bill would improve enforcement of state ADU law and prevent local barriers from slowing housing production. There was no opposition, and the bill passed 6-0. The committee then began hearing SB 79, which would allow more housing near major transit stops; the author and supporters framed it as a response to the housing shortage and transit underuse, and the hearing continued with extensive support testimony as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• I respectfully request your aye vote. Thank you.
• I respectfully request your I vote. Thank you.
• This year, he is a legislative advocate for ACOG District 9.
• Motion is do pass and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
• Motion is do pass and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> speaker and request roll call. speaker and request roll call.
• </c> I do support this legislation. I do support this legislation.
• </c> and it's evil what's happened to legisl and it's evil what's happened to legisl legislators<01:40
• </c> legislators in this room. legislators in this room.
• Speaker, I request a roll call. &gt;&gt; Mr. Speaker, I request a roll call.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, thank you, and let me thank all members for hearing this important piece of legislation.
• I am a proud co-author with you on this legislation. I hope we can get something done.
• Like most state agencies, we have an operating increase request.
• There is a one-time cost associated with this request.
• This is just a one-time appropriation of $200,000 in fiscal year 25 only.

Bills: HF1646, HF2443

Keywords: medical debt, debt relief, healthcare financing, consumer protection, financial hardship, commerce, cannabis, insurance, housing, ombudsperson, affordability, property, task force, financial institutions

Transcript Highlights:

• She is an IT consultant for our legislative website and will be observing the legislative process.
• Um, what legislative day is this? I think... oh, the seventh. Seventh legislative day, yes sir.
• the next legislative day.
• Gentlemen, I've got a request for co-sponsors. Okay, we have a request for co-sponsors. Mr.
• That's what the legislation is that we're offering. Okay, um, are we appropriating funds for this?

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> appropriate design code act. appropriate design code act.
• That is the legislative process.
• That is the legislative<00:21:24.880><c> process.
• But right now legislative process.
• <00:23:40.680><c> Council,</c> Legislative Council, Legislative Council, Vice<00:23:42.080><c> President

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Each remote agent must only be assigned requests for which they are trained and certified.
• One of the things we have, some of this relates to legislation that is in...
• One of the things we have, some of this relates to legislation that is in...
• If the hand signals are not relayed to the vehicle appropriately, the vehicle does not respond.
• As we know, we've seen legislation before that tries to incorporate a hybrid.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• is appropriate.
• I ask for your aye vote at the appropriate time.
• His relatives all rejected his request.
• At the appropriate time, I will respectfully ask for an aye vote.
• With that, I respectfully request your aye vote.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Human Services heard testimony on a series of bills affecting disability services, child welfare, foster youth, domestic violence survivors, guaranteed income pilots, crisis response, and child care providers. AB 1575 would update the Lanterman Act to use person-first language and broaden respite services to allow safe community access; supporters said it would improve dignity and consistency in services, and there was no opposition. AB 2470 would create a statewide one-stop reentry program for survivors of intimate partner violence to replace documents, repair credit, and access housing supports, while also giving CalWORKs emergency housing funds more flexibility; the Little Hoover Commission backed the bill based on its prior recommendations. AB 2510 would clarify and expand CalWORKs family reunification aid so parents can keep receiving support during reunification even if not all children are removed, and supporters said it would reduce barriers and better align with reunification goals. AB 2585 would expand guaranteed income pilot funding to rural and underserved counties, with testimony emphasizing the need for geographic diversity and data from places like the Central Valley. AB 1932, the Crisis Act 2.0, would continue and strengthen community-based mental health crisis response programs; testimony from family members and advocates strongly favored non-law-enforcement responses, and the bill drew broad support. AB 1925 would direct a feasibility study on a statewide permanent disability certification process to reduce repeated verification burdens; the committee approved it 4-0 and sent it to Appropriations. AB 2189 would fund a statewide special education parent action network to train and connect parents for systemic advocacy; after some opposition over the use of state funds for advocacy, it passed as amended and was referred to Education. AB 2684 would allow out-of-state nonminor dependents to do monthly social worker visits virtually, with in-person visits still required quarterly; it passed to Judiciary. AB 1967 would improve pathways for older youth experiencing homelessness or failed adoptions to enter or reenter foster care, and it passed to Appropriations. AB 2126 would create a targeted background-check exemption for certain former foster youth hired as peer partners, and it passed as amended to Public Safety. AB 2379 would require DSS to notify family child care providers of Fourth Amendment rights and provide multilingual know-your-rights training regarding immigration enforcement; it passed to Judiciary after some members questioned whether DSS was the right agency to administer the training.

Transcript Highlights:

• I appreciate your work on this, and I think the committee amendments appropriately narrow it.
• I'd also like to be added as a co-author at the appropriate time.
• Where HOA requested to see the inside of everybody's garage to make... ...where HOA requested to see
• supply that inspection copy to the park upon request.
• And so. preview of HCD and you're trying to change legislation that falls under their umbrella.

Summary: The Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee heard four items, including one consent bill, and began before quorum was established. AB 760, by Assemblymember Ta, would temporarily allow mobile home park-owned homes to be rented to people displaced by a natural disaster in areas under a declared state of emergency, including adjacent jurisdictions. Supporters said it would quickly add housing after fires, floods, or earthquakes; there was no opposition at the hearing, and members generally praised the narrow committee amendments. The bill later passed on a due-pass-as-amended vote. Chair Haney presented AB 1445, which would let cities create downtown recovery districts to finance office-to-housing conversions and other downtown revitalization projects using growth in property tax revenue. Support came from the California Travel Association, Housing Action Coalition, IKEA, Spur, Abundant Housing, and Circulate San Diego, with members saying the bill could help downtowns recover and expand mixed-use housing. The committee voiced support and interest in broader use of the tool, and the bill was approved on a due-pass-as-amended vote. AB 456, by Assemblymember Connolly, drew the most extensive debate. The bill would prohibit mobile home park managers from requiring interior repairs or improvements as a condition of sale and would require timely written lists of exterior repairs, with supporters arguing that park managers are interfering with sales and delaying closings. Opponents, led by the Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association, argued that interior inspections are needed to protect buyers and park residents from unsafe conditions and potential liability. Members raised questions about safety, disclosure, HCD oversight, and liability; after discussion, the bill was moved on a due-pass-as-amended vote, with some members not voting or expressing reservations. The committee also approved the consent calendar.

Transcript Highlights:

• What we do approve are reorganization requests for virtual schools.
• That seemed like the appropriate program.
• So that is why the department... had requested, made that request for them to voluntarily report to us
• request was submitted.
• So I hope that we're able to do that this legislative session. So, Mr...

Keywords: 996, all