Video & Transcript Research : 'Akamai Arrival Program'
Page 247 of 500
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 02/26/25
Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
Transcript Highlights:
- abrahamson here who runs that uh program abrahamson here who runs that uh program and<00:02:25.920
- We did look at the bio program. We've looked at the MPCA.
- The MPCA has grant programs for past replacement.
- <00:52:36.880>
was in the past the Bion setum program was in the past the Bion setum program - has Grant programs for past replacement has Grant programs for past replacement the<00:53:32.480
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Energy Development and Transmission Committee Feb 26th, 2026 at 09:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- So in 2015, that program was developed.
- The pipeline restoration program...
- The pipeline restoration program...
- You have the program because it was a compromise to not pass a bill which would have... ...that program
- He talked about the ombuds program.
Summary:
The Energy Development and Transmission Committee met in interim session and approved the November 6 minutes. Chair Novak outlined the committee’s study agenda, including large energy users such as data centers, geothermal, landowner relations, wind and solar, and other energy topics across the state. The meeting was framed as informational only, with no bills or formal legislative action taken beyond the minutes approval.
Testimony focused first on landowner relations. Oliver County Commissioner Dave Berger described the county’s energy history and local support for coal and related development. North Dakota Farmers Union President Matt Perdue emphasized proactive, face-to-face communication with landowners, respect for property rights, and the need for developers to be transparent about tradeoffs; he also discussed insurance and liability concerns tied to easements. Committee members asked about eminent domain, local versus state authority, and how communities can better understand the revenue and infrastructure implications of energy development.
Department of Agriculture Deputy Commissioner Tom Bodine then described the department’s ombudsman programs for pipeline restoration and reclamation, wind restoration, and royalty oversight. He said the programs provide confidential, third-party assistance on reclamation and royalty disputes, but do not provide legal advice. Senators raised concerns about post-production deductions in royalty leases and whether the ombudsman can explain them; Bodine said the program can clarify statements and deductions but cannot resolve legal disputes. He also said the department has not received requests related to fiber lines.
Representatives from Grid United and One Oak described their project development and landowner engagement practices. Grid United’s Brent Johnson discussed the North Plains Connector transmission project, its route selection process, voluntary acquisition approach, and efforts to avoid eminent domain by working closely with regulators, counties, townships, and landowners. One Oak’s Danette Welsh and Tom Giltner described the company’s midstream operations, extensive North Dakota footprint, and emphasis on direct landowner communication, consistent local regulation, careful construction practices, and post-construction reclamation. Members asked about setbacks, zoning consistency, invasive species prevention, outside advocacy groups, and eminent domain use; One Oak said it has not used eminent domain on its North Dakota projects, largely because most gathering lines are negotiated easements.
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services Jul 8th, 2026
Health & Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- So it's like a refer-a-friend program.
- We'll call up a panel of witnesses to testify on these bills and programs.
- And we don't have that authority in these camp programs.
- So that's something else for us to consider. ...that authority in these camp programs.
- He arrived with a suitcase and only a few hundred dollars.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Senate Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources Committee, February 17, 2026 - PM
Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- We program than we take in right now.
- <00:08:33.680>
I programs and foundational support. I programs and foundational support. - have worked hard uh in matching programs have worked hard uh in matching programs like<00:15:07.440
- legislature $2.5 million for AI programs legislature $2.5 million for AI programs and<00:15:15.440
- mentioned we do have a lot of programs mentioned we do have a lot of programs in<00:31:24.559>
Keywords:
landowner licenses, hunting, wildlife management, quota hunt areas, game and fish commission, game management, hunting regulations, black bear, tracking dogs, wildlife conservation, conservation, contracting, supervisor, funding, districts, hunting licenses, donated licenses, life-threatening illness, vision impairment, nonprofit organizations
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Health and Human Services Oversight Committee (09/26/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- The SNAP program does have far-reaching impacts to other programs, including the National School Lunch
- Program that New Hampshire offers.
- That's the top of that program, the Medicaid expansion. which is the granted advantage program which
- >
on <00:43:46.960>expansion, Medicaid program who's on expansion, Medicaid program who's - for future programming and priorities. for future programming and priorities.
Summary:
The committee first approved the draft minutes of its May 16, 2025 meeting, with one correction removing Representative Dry from the attendance list because she was present as a guest rather than an appointed member. The committee then received a Department of Health and Human Services update from Commissioner Lori Weaver, who focused on the rural health transformation grant process. She said the department has been gathering stakeholder input since July, issued a request for information on September 22, and is working toward an end-of-October draft and a November 3 deadline, with a grant writer request expected to go before Governor and Council at no cost to the state.
The bulk of the meeting centered on federal changes affecting SNAP and Medicaid. Karen Heert explained that the federal law changes commonly referred to as the “Big Beautiful Bill” or HR1 will affect SNAP eligibility and state costs, including a shift in administrative cost sharing from 50/50 to 75/25 beginning in October 2026 and a possible state share of benefits if New Hampshire’s error rate is too high. She said the program affects about 43,000 households, that New Hampshire’s federal fiscal year 2024 error rate was 7.57% versus a national rate of 10.93%, and that the state must get below 6% to avoid liability. She also said DHS is preparing remediation steps, auditing cases, and seeking technology and staffing support, including a grant for automation and training.
Henry Litman then described Medicaid changes under HB2 and the new federal law. He said New Hampshire returned to pre-pandemic eligibility verification rules on July 1, including a 10% income compatibility standard and reduced ex parte renewals, which has increased manual work and contributed to a drop in enrollment from about 185,000 in late June to about 178,000 in early September. He also reviewed new child premiums, pharmacy copays, Granite Advantage premiums, and possible Medicaid work requirements, noting that DHS is working with CMS on implementation details and may use a state plan option rather than an 1115 waiver because it would be less expensive and faster. Members asked several questions about the SNAP error-rate rules, the distinction between administrative and client errors, the effect of unpaid copays, and the timing and legal risk of the Medicaid work requirement; no votes were taken on those policy issues.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (01/15/2025)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- accounting level in the nursing program accounting level in the nursing program I<01:02:43.599><
- Our one ask would be to fully fund this program.
- would be to uh fully fund this program would be to uh fully fund this program uh<01:03:42.039>
- The peer support program has a very valuable peer support program that they have expanded to states across
- programs where outpatient or inpatient programs where we<01:27:15.760>
can <01:27:15.880>get
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, 10:15 having arrived, I'm going to call this meeting of the Tax Committee to order for March 18th
- ashor financial assistance program ashor financial assistance program within<00:21:37.240>
the - Grant process for both of these programs Grant process for both of these programs um<01:13:17.199
- Federal grant funds for the Vita program Federal grant funds for the Vita program and<01:17:39.360
- every day how these high impact programs every day how these high impact programs help<01:20:08.480
Keywords:
taxation, income tax, property tax, corporate tax, homestead credit, local government aid, tax credits, economic development, taxpayer assistance, tax credit outreach, tax preparation, free tax help, IRS, Department of Revenue, general fund appropriation, earned income tax credit, child tax credit, volunteer income tax assistance, VITA, low-income taxpayers
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division II (03/09/2026)
Transcript Highlights:
- And I risk-based monitoring program.
- program for each of the uh students. program for each of the uh students.
- . program. program.
- students we know are in this program. students we know are in this program.
- monitoring program. monitoring program.
Summary:
The committee took up HB 1563, a special education aid formula bill, after a brief recess. Members reviewed a replace-all amendment that would keep the current reimbursement lag structure but make the bill effective July 1, 2028, with districts beginning to collect the new data in the next biennium. The amendment changes the reimbursement tiers from a dollar-based system to one tied to average per-pupil spending: districts would pay 100% below 2.5 times average per-pupil spending, 85% from 2.5 to 3.5 times, 20% from 3.5 to 10 times, and 10% above 10 times, with the state covering the remainder. Speakers emphasized that the bill is intended as an incremental step to gather better data before any larger expansion of state participation.
A major new section would create a risk-based monitoring program for reimbursement claims. Instead of reviewing every claim individually, the department would review at least 20% of districts each year so every district is reviewed at least once every five years, with additional random or targeted reviews based on risk indicators, anomalies, prior findings, or other department criteria. Members discussed whether the audit sample should be district-based or student-based, and whether the bill should more specifically define the type of audit and the meaning of “other” criteria. Department witnesses said the current process already involves confidential information and that the new approach would not worsen privacy concerns; they also said the department would follow federal and state privacy laws and adopt rules to implement the process.
Several members supported the bill as a practical first step to improve data collection and eventually expand aid, noting that districts currently do not track lower-cost special education students well. Others raised concerns about the lack of a fiscal note, possible local costs, and whether the new monitoring language gives the department too much discretion. The discussion ended with no vote taken in the excerpt, and members indicated they may need more time to review the final amendment before proceeding.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Minnesota House passes bill to ban 'nudification technology' 4/23/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Again, I thank you to the many stakeholders, including the Attorney General's office, for their work arriving
Summary:
House File 1606, as amended, was debated on the House floor as a bill to prohibit access to nudification technology and related AI-generated sexual deepfakes. Representative Hansen, the bill’s author, described the measure as a response to non-consensual, sexually explicit images and videos, especially harms to children and women, and said the bill would define nudified content, require nudifying features on apps and websites to be turned off in Minnesota, bar promotion of such apps, and create enforcement and remedies. Supporters emphasized testimony from survivors, the rapid growth of AI-generated child sexual abuse material, and the need for state action because federal regulation has lagged. Opponents of the amendment argued the underlying bill should remain a clean, single-issue measure focused on non-consensual content creation and warned that adding age-verification language would complicate the bill and add cost.
Representative Bakeberg offered amendment A4, which would add age-verification requirements for commercial adult-content sites, with privacy limits for adults and enforcement mechanisms including audits and attorney general authority. Supporters of the amendment said it would extend existing physical-world protections for minors into the digital space, cited legal support from a Texas case and similar laws in other states, and argued it would help protect children from online pornography. Representative Hansen opposed the amendment, saying she had not been consulted, that it would muddy the bill’s focus on non-consensual nudification, and that it would add fiscal cost. Other members spoke both for and against the amendment, with some saying the issues were related and others saying the amendment was not ready and should be handled separately.
The House then took a roll call on amendment A4, and it failed on a 67-67 tie. After the amendment was not adopted, the bill was given its third reading. In closing remarks, supporters of the underlying bill reiterated that it was intended to protect victims and prevent harm before it occurs, while one member said the bill did not go far enough because it targeted software makers rather than the people creating and distributing the material. The transcript ends with further discussion of the bill’s purpose and support for moving it forward.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assessment data in property tax litigation 2/26/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
NM
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- the overall statutory scheme and language of the entirety of this legislative act, you will have to arrive
- affixed to public property or any private property except for removal by the owner of the property.' arrive
- at the same logical conclusion as arrive at the same logical conclusion as to<00:24:49.159>
the <03:48:15.399>- implement a vulnerability<03:48:14.399>
disclos <03:48:14.760>osure <03:48:15.120>program for vulnerability disclos osure program for vulnerability disclos osure program - implement a vulnerability<03:48:14.399>
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- These vehicles have, because of the way they're programmed and with the equipment that they have on board
- So my question is, you want us to trust a non-human vehicle that's built and programmed by humans versus
- I was recently out in Las Vegas, middle of December, and they are in a starter program, I guess, for
- that I've managed at Webster University and additionally programs that I've managed and lectures that
- that I've managed at Webster University and additionally programs that I've managed and lectures that
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I previously worked as an advocate at a family violence program in the shelter.
- One, some of our programs, primarily in rural areas, are actual homes where it's highly possible...
- If programs can't operate in their current structures, the costs would shut down their services.
- New federal law requires family violence programs to serve all victims.
- Have a concern, and for rural smaller programs, they might have like a single ADA accessible bathroom
Keywords:
gender designation, civil penalties, private civil rights, multiple-occupancy spaces, Texas Women's Privacy Act, law enforcement, confidentiality, personnel files, employee records, misconduct, abortion, civil liability, abortion-inducing drugs, qui tam actions, Texas Citizens Participation Act, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, healthcare regulations, impact fees, water conservation, reuse projects
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session: 2025 First Special Session 6/9/25 - Part 3
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- and the North Star Promise program.
- of the state grant program and the Northstar<00:08:08.160>
Promise <00:08:08.560>program. - whether it's nursing assistant programs whether it's nursing assistant programs to<00:49:11.599>
- very good programs very good programs and<00:55:03.280>
their <00:55:03.680>their < - We did not cut county program aid.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- . program. program.
- . program. program.
- These programs are run on a explain. These programs are run on a razor-thin<04:04:02.560>
margin. - exchange program harvests syringe waste. exchange program harvests syringe waste.
- are syringe exchange programs. are syringe exchange programs.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 04/10/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Is that prison or do certain programming. So, prison or do certain programming.
- mentioned that we already have programs mentioned that we already have programs in<00:53:26.960>
- It prohibits access programs.
- Uh we view this as a programs.
- Thank you, Chair. access program. The notion here to access program.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 066 Mar 20th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It continues the licensing and regulating of these professions rather than allowing the program to sunset
- you got to look at them instead<03:38:29.720>
of <03:38:29.800>just <03:38:30.000>arrive - instead of just arrive them. instead of just arrive them.
- centered around schools, around their hospitals, around shared treatment providers, co-responder programs
- People know each co-responder programs. People know each other. other. other.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- The cost of the program was over $14 million. The following year, the program cost $22 million.
- This helps Education Program.
- This amendment cuts that program program program entirely.<04:37:41.439>
Who <04:37:41.760> - program will not be able to continue. program will not be able to continue.
- many of these essential programs. many of these essential programs.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (02/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Are you aware of any, uh, health and wellness program in this state of, uh, such a specific requirement
- She said that will lay out the aspects of the school health education program that have been approved
- <00:57:39.400>
at was not yet an adult when I arrived at was not yet an adult when I arrived - <01:08:36.799>
uh <01:08:36.960>R very low quality program uh R very low quality program - the way the bill is light programming the way the bill is light laid<04:30:49.199>
out <04:30:
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 662, which would require public schools to include discussion of abortion procedures and show specified videos in health education classes. The prime sponsor argued the bill would ensure students receive medically accurate, age-appropriate, and nonpolitical information about abortion, saying the topic is important for informed decision-making and should be taught consistently statewide. He said the videos were intended for grades 9-12, that parents could opt out, and that the requirement was meant to supplement, not sway, students’ views. He also acknowledged the bill could be seen as limiting local control over curriculum and said the intent was to prevent the topic from being missed due to scheduling disruptions.
Committee members questioned the sponsor about local control, the need for a video mandate, the source of his statistics, whether the bill could be biased or inflammatory, and whether the requirement should apply every year in high school. The sponsor said the videos were only a starting point, could be replaced by others, and were meant to be informational. He also said the bill was not intended to influence students’ decisions about abortion. Several supporters testified in favor, including representatives of New Hampshire Right to Life and others who said students should be told the “truth” about abortion and its consequences. They emphasized graphic or emotionally difficult aspects of abortion and argued that young people need this information to make informed choices.
Opponents and skeptical witnesses raised concerns about prescribing curriculum, eroding local control, and the appropriateness of the material for younger high school students. The New Hampshire School Administrators Association said the bill was overly prescriptive, that health education standards are already set by the State Board of Education, and that the topics in the bill are not part of the current standards. That witness recommended the committee consider retaining the bill for further work or making it less prescriptive. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.