Video & Transcript : 'Chapter 32' :
Page 246 of 500
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- This bill repeals chapters 69, 76, and 77 of Title 18. I have three of them here.
- This bill repeals chapters 69, 76, and 77 of Title 18, which is Idaho anti-camcorder piracy act, the
- that such procedures shall not be subject to rulemaking, judicial review, or other provisions of Chapter
- I did a little bit of perusal of what's in Chapter 52, Title 67. It's very, very broad.
- Rulemaking, judicial review, or other provisions of the chapter.
Committee:
House Judiciary, Rules and Administration
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- 76 and chapter 8.
- 76 and chapter 8.
- 76 and chapter 8.
- 76 and chapter 8.
- </c> amendments to chapter 76 and chapter 8. amendments to chapter 76 and chapter 8.
Committee:
House Labor
Keywords:
workforce development, craftspersons, skilled trades, artisan, craftsmanship, trade recognition, award program, DLIR, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Meilleur Ouvrier de France, vocational education, career pathways, cultural preservation, workforce excellence, apprenticeship, Hawaii trades, economic diversification, public nominations, governor awards, historically significant venue
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- House Bill 2192, enacting Title 23, Chapter 2, relating to employment.
- House Bill 2192, enacting Title 23, Chapter 2. Go ahead and read the first bill on the calendar.
- House bill 2192, enact amending 10.0.23, Chapter 2, 2, relating to employment.
- Household 2592 enactment in title 18, Chapter 1, Article 1, and Vice Statue, Binding, Section 18105,
- Amending Title 41, Chapter 21, Article 1, Section 41-105, relating to state...
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- Physicians for Social Responsibility, Arizona Chapter.
- Please see the first bill on the calendar: SB 1002, an act amending Title 46, Chapter 2, Article 2 of
- Please do the next bill on the calendar: SB 1331, an act amending Title 46, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the
- Please do the next bill on the calendar: SB 1333, an act amending Title 46, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the
- Please read the last bill on the calendar: SB 1368, an act amending Title 46, Chapter 2, Article 2 of
Summary:
The Senate opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then recognized several visiting groups at the Capitol, including OBGYNs and trainees for Women’s and Reproductive Health Day, environmental advocates for Environmental Day, Arizona Maha Coalition members, nurses for Arizona Nurses Day, aerospace industry representatives for Aerospace Day, and guests for International Mother Language Day and other district visitors. Several proclamations and recognitions were read, including International Mother Language Day, Arizona Aerospace Day, and a recognition of Israeli Supreme Court Justice Daphne Barak-Erez. The chamber also welcomed the Doctor of the Day and a newly appointed commissioner, and the President Pro Tem made temporary committee appointments.
The main floor business was a Committee of the Whole on several SNAP-related bills. SB 1002, concerning SNAP/TANF public welfare verification, received a floor amendment from Senator Kavanagh and was advanced with a do pass recommendation. SB 1331, relating to SNAP military employment and training, also advanced do pass. SB 1333, relating to a SNAP error rate forensic audit, was amended by the Health and Human Services Committee and advanced do pass after Senator Gonzalez spoke in opposition, arguing the bill did not address the underlying federal error-rate problem and could increase state costs.
SB 1334, concerning SNAP work requirement waivers and exemptions, advanced do pass despite Senator Gonzalez’s opposition, in which she argued the bill would restrict Arizona’s flexibility, especially in rural and tribal areas, and could harm older adults and people with disabilities. SB 1368, concerning SNAP purchase restrictions, was then taken up; Senator Gonzalez began speaking in opposition, but the transcript cuts off before the debate or final action on that bill is completed.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:32:00.080><c> The</c><00:32:00.240><c> eyes</c><00:32:00.559><c> have</c><00:32:00.799><c> it
- The<00:32:01.200><c> consent</c><00:32:01.679><c> calendar</c><00:32:02.240><c> is</c><00:32:02.480><
- We are now<00:32:04.000><c> going</c><00:32:04.159><c> to</c><00:32:04.399><c> move</c><00:32:04.640>
- ><c> tax</c><00:32:46.320><c> credit</c><00:32:46.720><c> capped</c><00:32:47.039><c> at</c><00:32:47.360
- ><c> A</c><00:32:49.120><c> business</c><00:32:49.679><c> must</c><00:32:50.000><c> be</c><00:32:50.240
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Republican Press Conference 3/10/25
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> under current statute because of chapter under current statute because of chapter 13<00:09:33.640
- </c><00:09:37.360><c> 13</c><00:09:38.279><c> so</c><00:09:38.480><c> someone</c> protected under chapter
- 13 so someone protected under chapter 13 so someone can<00:09:39.000><c> report</c><00:09:39.360><c>
- </c><00:09:57.800><c> 13</c> someone who can receive the chapter 13 someone who can receive the chapter
- 13 and so is still protected by chapter 13 and so what<00:10:09.880><c> the</c><00:10:10.399><c> what
Summary:
State Representative Jim Nash and Representative Kristin Robbins discussed a package of fraud-prevention bills, centered on House File 3 and a separate whistleblower-protection measure. HF 3 would require annual reports based on Office of the Auditor (OA/OLA) findings to be sent to ranking members of relevant committees, with the goal of giving appropriators more information about internal controls and follow-up on audit recommendations. Nash said the bill is intended to help reduce waste, fraud, and abuse, cited the Feeding Our Future case as an example of weak controls, and noted that the OA helped draft the proposal and supports it. He also said the bill’s language is modeled in part on Colorado and on earlier recommendations for more information to be shared with decision-makers.
Robbins said her bill would expand whistleblower protections for state employees, including unclassified employees, and add new protected reporting channels and definitions. She said employees are often afraid to come forward because of job and career concerns, and that the bill would better protect reports made to legislators, the OA, governmental bodies, and law enforcement. She and Nash said they were working with DFL members and committee chairs on bipartisan amendments to define “fraud” and “misuse,” and to align the language with the Inspector General bill and prior law.
In questions, Robbins explained that current law protects only certain employees and that her bill would broaden coverage and make it easier for employees to report concerns without fear. She said the OA supports the effort and that the added reporting pathways would help with follow-up on agency recommendations. Nash and Robbins both emphasized that the measures are part of a broader fraud-fighting package and expressed hope for bipartisan support, though Nash criticized DFL leadership for not backing the bills more openly. No votes or final actions were taken in the exchange shown.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Indian Affairs Aug 14th, 2025
House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- The State Tribal Collaboration Act is Chapter 11, Article 18 of the NMSA.
- Chapter 11 covers intergovernmental agreements and authorities.
- If it goes to the chapter, the chapter, by the regulations of the funds coming in, has to adhere to building
- We have the different statuses of the chapters, even with the 528.
- I'm lucky with Nosh Chitty Chapter.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am
Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure
Transcript Highlights:
- I am here to testify this morning on legislation I filed that would amend Chapter 146 of the General
- percent increased risk of wheezing, a 24 percent increased risk of being diagnosed with asthma, and a 32
- I’m here today to support S. 244, which proposes much-needed updates to Chapter 112, Section 263, which
Summary:
The hearing of the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure opened with logistical remarks about testimony procedures, time limits, accessibility supports, and the large number of witnesses. The first bill discussed was H. 451, which would allow professional license applicants who do not have a Social Security number to use an ITIN instead. Supporters said the bill would help qualified workers, especially immigrants, enter licensed trades and professions without lowering training or testing standards, while addressing workforce shortages. Committee members asked a few questions, and the bill was framed as a uniform statewide licensing reform.
The bulk of the hearing focused on S. 210 and H. 1278, two bills aimed at improving wheelchair repair and warranty protections. Supporters included the Attorney General’s Office, disability advocates, wheelchair users, clinicians, and legislators, who described long repair delays, missed work and medical appointments, loss of independence, hospitalizations, pressure injuries, and other harms caused by broken wheelchairs and slow service. They argued for stronger timelines, two-year warranties, required parts availability, loaner chairs, and enforcement mechanisms, with H. 1278 modeled on a Connecticut-style repair deadline and S. 210 focused on warranty protections. Several witnesses emphasized that wheelchairs are essential medical equipment, not ordinary consumer goods.
Opposition came from NCart, which said it supports solutions but raised concerns that the bills, as written, could be difficult to implement for complex rehab technology. NCart said some warranty provisions may not fit wear-and-tear components and noted that MassHealth has already taken steps such as preventive maintenance, reduced prior authorization, and transportation support. Other witnesses and advocates countered that the current market is dominated by a few profitable companies and that the legislature needs to impose clear standards because voluntary fixes have not worked. The committee also heard testimony on S. 195, a toxic-free kids bill from Senator Comerford and Representative Hawkins, which would restrict PFAS and other toxic chemicals in children’s products and create disclosure and phase-out requirements. No votes were taken during the hearing.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Senate Emergency Management Committee and Natural Resources and Water Committee May 13th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- breakdown of state wildfire resilience funding, this time focused on the wildfire and forest resilience chapter
- in this table, but I would highlight that about $600 million of the $1.5 billion available in this chapter
- And that was on pages 31 and 32 of this.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Senate Emergency Management Committee and Natural Resources and Water Committee May 13th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- This time focused on the wildfire and forest resilience chapter of Prop 4.
- in this table, but I would highlight that about $600 million of the $1.5 billion available in this chapter
- And that was on 31 and 32 of this.
Summary:
The joint Senate hearing focused on California wildfire resilience funding, the SB 254 report on natural catastrophe resilience, and how the state should better prioritize community hardening, recovery, and financing. Senators emphasized that catastrophic wildfires have driven major property losses, insurance cancellations, and affordability problems, and several members argued that prevention and home/community hardening should receive far more attention than they have to date. Members also raised concerns about CEQA and other permitting delays, the need for ongoing rather than one-time funding, and whether the state should rely more on the General Fund, utilities, or other sources such as polluter-pays approaches.
The Legislative Analyst’s Office said the state has appropriated about $4.7 billion for wildfire resilience since 2018-19, with most funding going to forest health, fuels reduction, and related landscape work, while only about $65 million has been specifically targeted to community hardening. LAO also noted that future one-time funding is likely to decline, that GGRF revenues may be limited under the new cap-and-invest structure, and that maintenance costs for treated areas could be substantial over time. Senators pressed LAO on why wildfire resilience is not more often funded through the General Fund and on whether current spending matches the scale of the risk.
Cal Fire’s State Fire Marshal described the state’s community wildfire preparedness strategy, centered on home hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation, and said the SB 254 report aligns with Cal Fire’s direction. He said California has roughly 4 million homes in the wildland-urban interface, most built before modern wildfire-resistant standards, and highlighted recent streamlining that approved 383 fuels-reduction projects in under 30 days during an emergency proclamation. Cal OES described the AB 38 pilot and FEMA hazard mitigation work, saying federal approval delays have been a major barrier and that the state has hardened 155 properties so far through the pilot, with many more in process.
The Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force said the state has coordinated more than $6 billion in state and federal investments, treated over 700,000 acres annually, and is shifting toward more regional, data-driven planning and block grants. Task force staff and Cal Fire both said they are moving beyond simple acreage metrics toward models that estimate avoided loss and community risk reduction, but acknowledged major data gaps on parcel-level home hardening and defensible space. No formal votes were taken; the hearing was informational, with members discussing possible future legislation and budget changes, including home inspection reforms and continued CEQA streamlining.
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- Tatiana Gonzalez, and I'm the government relations director for the Alzheimer's Association, Louisiana Chapter
- I'm here today to urge your continued support for the $824,000... ...chapter.
- Me and my husband, we have been farming for 32 years. He's a ninth-generation farmer with 22 kids.
Committee:
Senate Finance
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- In 1992, there were 32. In 2010, there were 26.
- Chloe Scott, speaking for Engage Florida, the University of Central Florida's League of Women Voter Chapter
- University of Central Florida's League of Women Voter Chapter, and honestly, young people everywhere.
Committee:
Senate Rules
Summary:
The Committee on Rules met with a quorum and heard a Governor’s Office presentation on a proposed congressional reapportionment map. The governor’s counsel argued that mid-cycle congressional redistricting is legally permissible, that race should not be considered at all in drawing districts, and that the Florida Fair Districts provisions are inconsistent with federal equal protection law and should be treated as non-severable. The presentation also discussed the pending U.S. Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais and the Florida Supreme Court’s Black Voters Matter decision as part of the legal rationale for the map.
Jason Parada, who said he drew the map alone, described the map as based on 2020 census block data, with county-level population estimates used only as a guide to identify faster-growing areas. He said the plan keeps 48 counties and 382 municipalities whole, has compactness scores similar to the current benchmark map, and uses traditional geographic and political boundaries such as roads, railways, county lines, and municipal lines. He walked through regional changes, emphasizing a race-neutral redesign that significantly altered South Florida, including changes to districts in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and the Everglades, while leaving several northern districts largely unchanged.
Members questioned the witnesses extensively about the legal theory, the use of partisan data, the role of race, population growth, and the timing and review of the map. The witnesses said partisan data was considered along with other traditional redistricting criteria, but race was not used. They also said they could not speak to who else reviewed the map beyond EOG staff and counsel. Several senators raised concerns about the map’s compactness, county and city splits, the apparent partisan effects, and the fact that the map was released shortly before the special session. No vote or final action on the map was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.
FL
Florida 2026 5th Special Session
Rules Apr 28th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- In 1992, there were 32. In 2010, there were 26.
- Chloe Scott, speaking for Engage Florida, the University of Central Florida's League of Women Voters chapter
- Chloe Scott, speaking for Engage Florida, the University of Central Florida's League of Women Voters chapter
Summary:
The Committee on Rules met with a quorum present and took up a presentation from the Governor’s office on proposed congressional reapportionment. Executive Office of the Governor counsel Mo Jazeel argued that mid-cycle congressional redistricting is legally permissible, that race should not be used in drawing districts, and that the Florida Fair Districts provisions are inconsistent with federal equal protection principles and, in the executive branch’s view, are inseverable. Jason Parada then presented the proposed map, explaining that it was drawn using 2020 census block data, with county growth estimates used only as a guide, and that the plan was designed to be race-neutral while also considering compactness, county and municipal boundaries, and other traditional redistricting criteria. He said the map keeps 48 counties and 382 municipalities whole, has compactness scores comparable to the current map, and makes the largest changes in South Florida, with some districts remaining unchanged and others reconfigured around population shifts and geographic boundaries.
Members questioned both presenters extensively about the legal basis for disregarding the Fair Districts Amendment, the use of partisan data, the absence of racial analysis, and whether the map truly reflects population growth. Jazeel said the executive branch’s position is that race-based provisions in the state constitution cannot be used if they conflict with the U.S. Constitution, and that the forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Calais could further clarify the law. Parada said he did not use race in drawing the map, did use partisan information as one of several traditional criteria, and relied on 2020 census data for population equality. Senators also pressed him on who reviewed the map, why the public and legislators had limited time to review it, and whether the plan was intended to favor Republicans; Parada denied partisan intent and said he was the only person who moved lines on the map, though he consulted with other Executive Office of the Governor staff and counsel.
Several senators raised concerns that the map did not clearly reflect Florida’s recent population growth, that some districts remained highly irregular, and that the plan appeared to be based on a legal theory contingent on future court rulings. The presenters responded that congressional districts must be equal to the person, that growth estimates can only guide orientation rather than replace census data, and that the map was designed to preserve as much of the existing structure as possible while making the largest adjustments in South Florida. No vote or final action on the map was taken during the excerpted portion of the meeting, and the committee continued with questions and discussion.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm the executive director for the state chapter for Children's Advocacy Centers, and I'm here today
- Executive Director for the State Chapter for Children's Advocacy Centers, and I'm here today testifying
- Since 2022, even with a 32% increase in minimum wage costs and overall inflation growth of 17.8% in the
Bills:
SB5998
Committee:
Senate Ways & Means
Keywords:
fiscal appropriations, budget, state funding, financial management, operating expenses, 904, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I don't address that here because I believe that's in a different chapter. using a title, depending on
- Research shows that in 32% of mass shootings with four more people killed, the shooter exhibited dangerous
- Texas chapter.
Committee:
Senate State Affairs
Keywords:
business organization, internal management, corporate governance, partnerships, liability reduction, birth certificate, biological sex, gender identity, health and safety, sex assignment, SB 875, Texas, independent school district, ISD, school board trustee, superintendent, campus administrator, electioneering, political signs, early voting
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, to establish a pretty broad rulemaking with regard to Chapter 4, stemming from the previous cha uh
- , Rule 8 under Chapter 3, of the Texas Administrative Code, uh, TA 16, chapter 3.
- Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 both begin with the premise that an operator shall not pollute.
- I am the Texas chapter president of the National Association of Royalty Owners, NARO for short.
- I represent the National Association of Royalty Owners Texas chapter. Yes, it was on me, sir.
Committee:
House Energy Resources
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
Joint Administrative Procedures Committee Feb 3rd, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Finally, we will consider a number of amendments to Chapter 120, prepared by staff and Senator Graal,
- When you look at the definition of rule in Chapter 120.5-2, thank you. Effect.
- rules that we are discussing today either do or do not comply with Chapter 120.
- In filing this objection, you are saying that this rule does not comply with Chapter 120.
- He recognized Senator Gruters to discuss recommendations for modifications to Chapter 120.
Summary:
The Joint Administrative Procedures Committee met on February 3, 2025, with a quorum present and took up three main items. First, the committee considered a large set of recommended objections to Agency for Health Care Administration rules, all centered on sunset provisions stating the rules would expire after five years. AHCA asked for another deferral while it reviewed the rules, arguing the sunset language was a form of self-restraint rather than an invalid exercise of rulemaking authority. Committee leadership disagreed that further delay would resolve the issue and moved to a single vote covering all objections. The motion passed by roll call, and the committee informed AHCA that an objection would be filed unless the agency amended the rules within 30 days.
The committee then heard an informational briefing from the Department of Environmental Protection on its Outstanding Florida Springs rule and stormwater rule. DEP explained that it did not prepare a statement of estimated regulatory cost for the springs rule because the proposed standards largely mirror existing water management district rules and the Central Florida Water Initiative framework, so DEP said there was no new regulatory burden. Members asked about permit authority, costs, and whether the rules were functionally different from prior rules. DEP maintained the rules set minimum standards and did not add costs beyond what regulated parties were already doing.
DEP also described implementation of the stormwater rule adopted under the 2020 Clean Waterways Act and later ratified by the Legislature in 2024. DEP said the rule was the product of years of workshops and technical advisory committee meetings, and that the final version included lower-cost alternatives, grandfathering, and phased implementation. DEP estimated the rule’s cost at about $2,600 per acre in the revised CERC, while industry witnesses said the real cost could be much higher, especially if land costs are included. A home builders representative argued the estimate understated impacts, while a stormwater engineer said the rule gives more flexible, performance-based tools and could become more cost-effective over time.
Finally, Senator Graal presented proposed Chapter 120 changes in SB 108, aimed at tightening and modernizing rulemaking. The proposal would require five-year rule reviews, annual agency reporting, faster notice of proposed rulemaking after authorizing legislation, electronic filing, public access to incorporated materials, clearer tracking of technical changes, and limits on how long rules can remain pending ratification. Members discussed whether the Legislature should be more specific in statutes about rulemaking deadlines and whether agencies should be more accountable when rules stall. No formal action was taken on the Chapter 120 proposals, and the committee adjourned after discussion.
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- Senate Bill 1083, an act amending title 33, Chapter 9, Article 3, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding
- section 33-1261.01 and amending title 33, Chapter 16, Article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding
- title 33, Chapter 16, Article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 33-1816.0, relating to
- An act amending Title 41, Chapter 27, Article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding Section 41-334.03
- Senate Bill 1252, an act amending Title 44, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding Chapter 6, relating to
Summary:
The Senate opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, recorded attendance, and approved the prior journal. Members then recognized several guests and honored the Maryvale High School basketball program and Maryvale Gifted and Talented Micro School with legislative proclamations, including a designation of February 12, 2026 as the Day of the Gifted Child and Student of Arizona. Senators also marked Arizona’s statehood anniversary and held a moment of silence for Emily Pike, with remarks calling for continued attention to missing and murdered Indigenous people and for changes to the turquoise alert law.
The chamber then moved into Committee of the Whole and third reading votes. Senate Bill 1107, relating to peace officer certification pathways, was amended and passed 27-2. Senate Bill 1032, appropriating money to the Corrections Oversight Fund, passed 29-0 after supportive explanations from senators. Senate Bill 1029 on campaign contributions and expenses passed 29-0, SB 1083 on condominiums and planned communities passed 29-0, SB 1252 on assignment for benefit of creditors passed 29-0, and SB 1259 on campaigns passed 29-0. SB 1198, relating to the Arizona Beef Council, drew debate over industry promotion and use of checkoff dollars and passed 23-6.
Senate Bill 1020, relating to special plates, was reconsidered after a motion by Senator Bolick and then passed again on reconsideration 25-4. The Senate also adopted the Committee of the Whole report, transmitted passed bills to the House, and agreed to a House request to return SBs 1333 and 1368 for reconsideration. Committee meeting announcements were made for the following Monday, and the Senate adjourned until February 16, 2026.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Formal House Session 25 Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am
Massachusetts House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- 30 of the General Laws, Chapter 17 of the Acts of 2018.
- Section 40, Section 2, DDD, DDD of Chapter 29 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2024 official
- That's 1.2% for Chapter 90 for road miles, with 92% to the T.
- The, the, with zero additional money for Chapter 90, outside of Road and Isles.
- 70 and Chapter 90 money.
Summary:
The House opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and received a resignation letter from Rep. Fana Howard of Lowell, effective March 17, 2026, as she transitioned to the Senate. The chamber then took up several procedural orders, including multiple unanimous or voice-vote suspensions of rules and concurrence with Senate petitions, such as referrals on housing and student transportation matters, and a suspension of Joint Rule 12 for a petition involving children served by DCF.
The main substantive item was House No. 5264, a fiscal year 2026 supplemental appropriations bill totaling about $1.8 billion. Members discussed its use of Fair Share surtax surplus funds for transportation and education, including major support for the MBTA, special education circuit breaker costs, early education and child care, snow and ice costs, regional transit authorities, and other deficiencies such as GIC and sheriff costs. Members also explained the bill’s tax conformity provisions responding to recent federal tax changes, with debate over whether to delay conformity to limit state revenue exposure. The House adopted a consolidated amendment to the bill and then passed it to be engrossed by roll call vote, 150-3.
The House also adopted a resolution commending the Admetek Foundation on Prostate Cancer Awareness Day. Several local bills were advanced, including a sick leave bank for a Department of Corrections employee, a bill waiving the minimum age requirement for a Boston police officer, a Nantucket charter bill, a Stoneham public safety bill, and a Malden special police officers bill, the last of which was amended before being engrossed. The chamber also considered Amendment 43 to redistribute $100 million of Fair Share revenue more evenly to municipalities for roads and education; supporters argued the current distribution favored statewide priorities over local aid, while opponents said the formula would not adequately address rural road needs. That amendment was rejected 128-25. The House then recessed several times, observed moments of silence for local public servants, welcomed visiting youth sports teams, and finally ordered adjournment to meet the next day at 11 a.m. in informal session.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:32:41.600><c> with</c><00:32:41.799><c> Amendment</c><00:32:42.519><c> Jennifer</c><00:32:42.919
- c><00:32:49.919><c> the</c><00:32:50.039><c> majority</c><00:32:50.480><c> report</c><00:32:50.880><c
- <00:32:52.679><c> representative</c><00:32:53.159><c> Dave</c><00:32:53.360><c> mes</c><00:32:53.639>
- :32:26.920><c> 18</c><01:32:27.320><c> will</c><01:32:27.480><c> still</c><01:32:27.679><c> be</c><01
- current<01:32:36.840><c> law</c><01:32:37.159><c> allows</c><01:32:37.719><c> no</c><01:32:38.520><c