Transcript Highlights:

• Subsection 3 is liability standards.
• Retailers are held to a much narrower standard.
• Subsection three are liability standards. its components or materials.
• Subsection three are liability standards.
• Retailers are held to a much narrower standard.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Commerce Committee approved the February 24, 2026 minutes and then considered a gubernatorial reappointment of Jeff Seilich to the Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho (PERSI) board. Seilich told the committee PERSI remains stable and well funded, and members praised his service; the committee said it would likely vote on the reappointment later in the week. The committee then advanced House Bill 543, a technical PERSI bill updating language to comply with federal Secure Act 2.0 by changing references from after-tax contributions to Roth-type contributions in the PERSI Choice Plan. Representative Ben Furman and PERSI Director Mike Hampton described it as a narrow compliance fix, and the committee voted unanimously to send the bill to the Senate floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 563, which revises CPA licensing requirements, also received a due pass recommendation. Representative Jeff Ehlers and Idaho Society of CPAs representatives said the bill is intended to address a shortage in the profession by creating three pathways to licensure, including options with fewer education hours but more experience, while keeping the CPA exam requirement and easing reciprocity for out-of-state CPAs. The committee voted to send the bill to the floor. The committee spent the most time on Senate Bill 1310, the Human Fetal Tissue Transparency Act, which would require labeling for products tested or developed using human fetal tissue or related cell lines. Supporters argued the bill would improve consumer transparency and informed consent for products such as vaccines, cosmetics, and food items; opponents and several senators raised concerns about federal preemption, enforcement, costs to businesses, and whether the bill would apply to doctors, hospitals, and retailers. After debate, the committee adopted a substitute motion to hold the bill in committee by a 5-4 roll call vote, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It applies the $1 million standard deduction to the individual, not a household, resulting in a combined
• standard deduction of $2 million for state-registered domestic partners and persons who are married.
• One of the things this bill does have built in is a $1 million standard deduction.
• This is a tax on the income derived, and that income has a standard deduction of $1 million.
• The amount of the standard deduction is $7,500 per person.

Summary: House Finance met in executive session on Gross Substitute Senate Bill 6346, the proposed “millionaires’ income tax” package. Staff reviewed the bill and a long list of amendments affecting the new income tax, related business tax changes, and several exemptions and implementation provisions. The committee adopted amendments to exempt diapers from sales tax, allow certain tribal income treatment clarifications, create an advisory group to help implement the tax, move up the repeal date for some business tax changes, and require the measure to go to the voters; several other amendments on federal conformity, agricultural income, pass-through entities, and the marriage threshold were rejected or withdrawn. The committee then adopted the striking amendment as amended and advanced the bill on a 9-6 do pass vote, with supporters arguing it would fund education, health care, child care, and tax relief, and opponents warning about competitiveness, capital flight, and the state’s spending growth. The committee then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 6097, which would add federally recognized Indian tribes as eligible entities for county Conservation Futures Program funding. Staff said the bill would not change the tax levy structure and would have no state revenue impact, while tribal witnesses said it would improve voluntary conservation partnerships for habitat, farmland, and open space. Members asked about the bill’s scope, and staff confirmed it applies only to federally recognized tribes. House Finance also heard Senate Bill 6162, a property tax reform measure that would consolidate the state school levy, expand senior and disability property tax exemptions, raise income thresholds, and simplify the application process with a standard deduction. The prime sponsor and county assessors supported the bill as a way to help seniors, disabled persons, and disabled veterans stay in their homes and reduce administrative burden, while several testifiers opposed it as a tax shift that would raise costs for others and potentially strain local revenues. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 6113, an administrative and technical tax cleanup bill related to last year’s tax changes; the Department of Revenue supported it and noted a possible clarifying amendment, while nonprofits, schools, libraries, health care groups, workforce training providers, and trade associations asked for additional exemptions for live presentations and related educational activities. The chair announced that Senate Bill 6097 would be added to Monday’s executive session, Senate Bill 6114 was removed, and amendments for Monday’s bills were due by 5 p.m. that day.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill before you requires the licensing standards to include a zero-tolerance policy for imminent
• The prior bill included more requirements for the standards of when restraint and isolation could be
• The prior bill included more requirements for the standards of when restraint and isolation could be
• So I'm curious because there's standards that are related to those, kind of how that conversation fit
• We've been doing investments in social emotional learning and standards going back a long time.

Summary: The committee opened by explaining that several bills had been removed from the agenda because the Senate must physically possess a bill before holding a public hearing. The chair said the missing bills would be rescheduled for Tuesday. The committee then waived the five-day notice rule for considering substitute House Bills 1705 and 32010, and proceeded to hear substitute House Bill 2219 and substitute House Bill 1795. House Bill 2219, on child care operational efficiency, would allow longer mixed-age ratio periods in child care centers, waive repeat DCYF orientation requirements in certain cases when staff have recently completed the same training, and require licensing standards to include a zero-tolerance policy for imminent physical harm involving high-potency synthetic opioids and related drug residue or paraphernalia. The prime sponsor and supporters said the bill would help child care providers manage staffing shortages, take breaks, and reduce duplicative licensing burdens. Testimony was strongly supportive, with advocates and providers describing the bill as a low-cost way to improve retention and flexibility. Questions focused on how the fentanyl language would apply to prescribed medications. House Bill 1795 would narrow and update state law on restraint and isolation in public schools and other public educational programs. The bill prohibits mechanical and chemical restraints and restraints that restrict breathing or blood flow, bars planned isolation in IEPs and 504 plans, limits planned restraint to cases with parent request and medical necessity, and prohibits new construction or remodeling of spaces intended primarily for student isolation. Supporters, including disability advocates, educators, school psychologists, principals, and state education groups, said the bill is a needed step toward reducing trauma and disproportionality and cited demonstration sites showing reductions in restraint and isolation. Some educators and paraeducators raised concerns about staffing, training, and what tools remain available in crisis situations, while others asked for future work on professional development and resources. No vote was taken on either bill during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• One step forward in favor of upholding the highest standards of patient care, transparency, and choice
• . ...from providing care consistent with current best practice standards.
• This bill is important to bring families in Idaho the most current evidence-based community standards
• of care in the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum phases of the standards for transfer of care
• This bill will deliver current community standards of care. ...licensed midwife is outdated.

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 528, which would codify the ability for patients to use self-donated or directed donor blood under federal testing and collection guidelines. Representative Chris Bruce said the bill was intended to ensure Idaho patients have that option in state law after some hospitals or facilities had denied requests. Supporters testified that the bill protects patient autonomy, religious freedom, and medical choice, and described personal experiences where directed donation was difficult or impossible to arrange in Idaho. Opponents, including representatives from Vitalant and the Red Cross, said directed and autologous donations are already available when medically indicated, that the bill addresses a problem that does not exist, and that it could add cost, complexity, and strain to an already severe blood shortage without improving safety. After debate over terms such as “detrimental” and “gross negligence,” a substitute motion to send the bill to amending order failed 7-9, and the original motion to send HB 528 to the House floor with a do pass recommendation passed 7-6. The committee then approved a rules docket for the Idaho Commission for the Blind and Visually Impaired’s Business Enterprise Program, which updates and streamlines rules governing vending and food service facilities operated by blind entrepreneurs. The committee next took up House Bill 550, a midwifery bill updating Idaho’s existing statute to allow licensed midwives to administer additional medications within their training and scope of practice. The sponsor and several midwives, nurses, and other supporters said the changes would modernize outdated law, improve care in rural areas, reduce unnecessary hospital transfers, and better address postpartum hemorrhage and other maternal or neonatal needs. One testifier described a tragic homebirth outcome and urged stronger safety limits, while the Idaho Medical Association said it had worked with the sponsor on compromise language. At the sponsor’s request, HB 550 was held in committee and the related revised RS was moved forward. The committee then approved RS-33-250, which incorporated agreed-upon changes defining a formulary and protocol and clarifying maternal and neonatal care language, sending it to the second reading calendar with a do pass recommendation. The meeting adjourned after completing the agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• It exempts factory-built housing using permit-ready plans from local zoning design standards and review
• And this bill helps to standardize that information.
• Third-party systems are widely used to streamline delivery, standardized formatting, and provide timely
• Failure to have these bills work together will result in confusion, exceptions, and unclear standards
• Reporting from the Washington State Standard shows that when local rules are loosened, ADU construction

Bills: SB6015, SB6069, SB6096, SB6200, SB6201, SB6214, SB6237, SGA9280, SGA9281

Keywords: residential building, construction permits, housing development, planning efficiency, state regulations, affordable housing, homelessness, homeless shelter, emergency shelter, emergency housing, supportive housing, permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, low-income housing, very low-income, extremely low-income, housing crisis, land use, zoning, local preemption

Transcript Highlights:

• The Working Families Tax Credit income limits are far below the need standards, in some cases around
• half or less of that standard.
• Thank you. and health services sets a need standard every year that reflects a more comprehensive cost
• The working families tax credit income limits are far below the need standards, in some cases around
• half or less of that standard.

Summary: House Finance heard testimony on two affordable housing bills. House Bill 1859 would expand an existing density bonus for housing on religious organization property by lowering the affordability threshold from 100% to at least 50% affordable units, requiring local policies to implement the bonus upon request, and creating a new state and local sales and use tax exemption for qualifying projects with at least 50% affordable units maintained for 10 years. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would help projects on church-owned land pencil out amid high construction and financing costs, while a county association raised concern that the bill would create an unfunded mandate for local planning departments. Several witnesses also asked that homeownership projects be explicitly included, and staff confirmed the exemption would be administered through an exemption certificate. The committee then moved to House Bill 1717, which would authorize cities and counties to create a local sales and use tax remittance program for affordable housing developments. Staff said the remittance would cover 100% of local taxes paid after project completion, with a 50% affordable housing threshold and 40-year affordability requirement, and the sponsor and local government and housing advocates supported it as a flexible tool to reduce development costs. Testifiers generally backed both bills, with some asking for more flexibility on income targeting and clarification on county-city interactions under HB 1717. No votes were taken; both public hearings were closed and the committee adjourned after a separate work session on the Working Families Tax Credit, where advocates urged broader eligibility, higher benefit amounts, and easier access, and a California researcher described data-linking methods used to improve tax credit take-up.

Transcript Highlights:

• We want to make sure that we have clear boundaries as we are setting standards for AI technology.
• In 2025, state law directed OSPI to post a schedule for the revision of the state learning standards.
• , and revised learning standards will be adopted in the first half of 2028.
• This bill aligns this instruction with revised state learning standards and builds on existing ethnic
• I went back and looked, as a good social studies teacher, at the current social studies standards.

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 5901, which would change the school construction assistance program so that instructional space on military bases is excluded from a district’s available space inventory when calculating state construction aid. Staff explained the bill would also require state assistance to equal approved project cost minus federal funding received. Senator Christian said the measure is intended to prevent military-base facilities from unfairly reducing districts’ ability to modernize or build schools. Testimony in support came from OSPI, Clover Park School District, and Medical Lake School District, which said the current formula penalizes districts serving military families and can leave them unable to secure needed renovation funding. No opposition was heard, and the bill was later described as having an indeterminate fiscal impact. The committee then took up Senate Bill 5860 on school board compensation. The bill would raise director pay from $50 to $100 per day, increase the annual cap, allow child care expenses to be reimbursed, require OFM to periodically adjust compensation, and direct WASDA to develop finance training for school directors. Senator Cortez said the changes are needed to broaden who can serve on school boards and to help working families participate. Supporters from OSPI, WASDA, and South Sound superintendents said compensation could improve diversity and help recruit and retain board members, though WASDA noted concerns about diverting district funds and said its members do not have consensus on mandatory training. Opponents argued the bill would misuse levy funds and that child care and other expenses should not be paid from local education levies. The committee also heard Senate Bill 5956 on artificial intelligence, student discipline, and surveillance in schools, which would bar automated systems from being the sole basis for discipline decisions, prohibit risk scores and biometric surveillance, require OSPI guidance updates, and direct WASDA to create model policy. Senator Nobles and supporters said the bill is needed to protect students from discriminatory and inaccurate AI-driven decisions; no vote was taken in the hearing. Finally, the committee heard a proposed substitute for Senate Bill 5574, which would require districts to include instruction on Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, Latino American, and Black American history in required social studies courses during the regular curriculum review cycle, with reporting beginning in 2030. Senator Nobles said the bill is meant to address exclusion and bias in history education and to help students see themselves reflected in the curriculum. Testifiers from education, student, parent, and community groups overwhelmingly supported the measure, saying it would improve belonging, reduce bullying, and build on existing curriculum resources without creating a new course or major new cost. The hearing ended without a vote or other formal action on SB 5956 or SB 5574.

Transcript Highlights:

• And is that type of articulation agreement standard across the state?
• And those standards are determined by each college, or is there a state standard? Perhaps Dr.
• For us, on the technical college side, there are specific standards for each course and each program.
• the standards and outcomes for the courses and the programs at the state college.
• And that's standard across the state? And that is approved by the four districts I've worked in.

Summary: The Higher Education Appropriations Committee met for its first meeting of the session and heard presentations focused on workforce education in the Florida College System and district technical colleges. Members introduced themselves and discussed their personal connections to higher education, then heard from Department of Education senior chancellor Kevin O’Farrell, South Florida State College president Fred Hawkins, and Pinellas Technical College representative Mark Hunt. O’Farrell outlined the department’s budget request, including increases for adult education, Florida College System program funds, workforce development capitalization grants, apprenticeship and teacher apprenticeship programs, Open Door scholarships, and CAPE industry certification funding. He emphasized record growth in enrollments, completions, dual enrollment, and program offerings, and described grant-funded expansion in fields such as health sciences, manufacturing, logistics, aerospace, and AI-related programs. Committee members raised concerns about whether current programs match actual labor-market demand, how artificial intelligence may reduce future human labor needs in some fields, and how the state should avoid unwarranted duplication of programs. O’Farrell said the department uses economic forecasts, employer demand data, and a CTE audit process to review programs and phase out those that do not meet performance thresholds. Members also asked for more detail on the teacher apprenticeship model, the transition from technical college clock hours to college credit, job placement and salary outcomes, and the LPN-to-RN pathway. O’Farrell said he would provide additional information later. Hawkins described South Florida State College’s rural service area, low college-going rates, and difficulty recruiting and retaining faculty and staff because salaries lag behind local market alternatives and nearby school district pay. He said the college has had to turn away students in high-demand programs due to staffing and operational limits, while also noting strong outcomes in nursing, dental hygiene, EMT/paramedic, and radiography. Hunt said Pinellas Technical College serves about 5,000 students annually, including many dual-enrolled high school students, and reported a placement rate above 90% and strong local economic returns. He said many programs have waiting lists and that additional operational funding is needed to meet demand, maintain equipment, and keep pace with salary and cost increases. The meeting ended after public comment was opened and no further business was brought before the committee, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that is a typical standard, one that is adhered to and one that we certainly have and share a lot
• Blue Origin or whether it's fuel across today, as we've heard, at that 80,000-pound standard.
• That is the standard that is in place today.
• If it meets those standards, then that load must be divided to 80,000 pounds.
• And that is a typical standard, one that is adhered to and one that we certainly have and share a lot

Bills: SB2199, SB2200, SB2201, SB2949, SB2332

Keywords: overweight vehicle, vehicle weight limits, hazardous materials, hazmat, cargo tank, fuel transport, trucking, commercial vehicle, Transportation Code, criminal penalty, second-degree felony, loading violation, truck weight, axle weight, gross weight, public safety, commercial carrier, Texas, commercial truck, truck route

Transcript Highlights:

• Transmission distribution has been the standard for for decades and on undergrounding has been added
• Our new standard is a submersible type switch gear.
• When standards, the lateral hardening.
• Then it should be approved and see review and not the public interest standard.
• You know, the plan is adopted with the public interest standard.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and adherence to criminal procedural law standards.
• I am denied not because I do not meet the standards, but because my agency was forgotten or did not exist
• If two officers perform the same duties, meet the same standards, and face the same risks, they should
• Your intent, with the police reform law, is to hold everybody to the same standards for training and
• This does not have the same standard for court officers.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Service heard testimony on a wide range of bills affecting public safety and public sector employees, with most of the discussion focused on expanding occupational presumptions and retirement protections for police, firefighters, correction officers, court officers, and other public employees. Testifiers from the Legislature, police and fire unions, the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, PERAC, and the AFL-CIO generally supported bills covering cancer presumptions, contagious disease presumptions, Parkinson’s disease for firefighters, PTSD-related disability and death, and equity for post-certified police officers under the Heart Law. Several speakers emphasized that these conditions are linked to long-term occupational exposure, that current law leaves out agencies such as UMass police, Environmental Police, DMH police, and other state or campus police, and that the bills would correct gaps in existing benefits and presumptions. Representative Colleen Garry and Senator Joan Lovely spoke in support of expanding the Heart Law and cancer presumption protections, while Representative and Senator sponsors for the firefighter and PTSD bills described the health risks faced by first responders and urged favorable reports. PFFM and MassCOP representatives argued that firefighters and police officers face toxic exposures, infectious disease risks, and chronic stress, and cited studies and other states’ laws in support of the measures. PERAC testified that the PTSD accidental disability bill would clarify confusing case law and update filing requirements so traumatic incidents can be used in applications even when PTSD develops later, while still requiring medical review and retirement board approval. Additional testimony came from correction officers and trial court officers seeking comparable disability and pension protections, including a bill to extend a 100% disability pension to correction officers injured in violent attacks and a bill to treat court officers more like police and firefighters when injured in the line of duty. The committee asked a few clarifying questions, including about whether the PTSD bill would address post-retirement claims and about the impact of excluding “forgotten” police agencies. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the committee ultimately adjourned after hearing all scheduled testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• State legislatures have the primary authority in shaping school curriculum and educational standards,
• , particularly with standards, I know probably the majority of the committee understands how that comes
• Can you talk to us a little bit about that creation for standards and the employees, and the employees
• Yes, I'm not as involved in the standard development process to provide some reassurance.
• Alsley, made an excellent point about how cautious we should be when we are implementing new standards

Summary: The committee heard RS 33261, the School-Sponsored Bible Reading Act, which would require public school teachers to read sequential Bible passages daily without comment or instruction, with accommodations for objections and injunctive relief as the enforcement mechanism. The sponsor and a representative from Idaho Family Policy Center argued the bill fits Idaho’s history and the U.S. Supreme Court’s current “history and tradition” approach, while opponents said it was unconstitutional, not voluntary, and inconsistent with separation of church and state. A substitute motion to return the RS to the sponsor failed on a tie vote, and the motion to introduce the RS also failed on a tie vote. The committee then considered RS 33332 C1, which would treat student walkouts or absences for protest as unexcused and require reporting to state officials. The sponsor said the bill was aimed at students leaving class to protest during school hours, while members raised concerns about impacts on student civic engagement, parent-excused absences, and politically active youth groups. The RS was introduced by voice vote. Next, the committee heard a revised RS 33523-2-3 on collecting aggregate data about students’ immigration status in public schools to estimate the cost of educating non-citizen students. The sponsor said the bill would not deny enrollment, would use only aggregate data, and was intended to help the legislature understand costs; members questioned administrative burden, possible discrimination, and the fiscal note. The motion to introduce the RS failed on a tie vote. Finally, the committee advanced Senate Bill 1244, a code-cleanup measure removing obsolete regional library system provisions, to the floor with a due pass recommendation. It also heard Senate Bill 1227 on artificial intelligence in K-12 education, which would create a state framework for AI use, local district policies, training, transparency, and privacy protections; testimony was generally supportive but urged caution, especially for younger students. The committee voted to send SB 1227 to general orders for amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then the last part is the standard liability language for both STR owners and local governments.
• Demanding no tracking or promoting at-will safety standards is reckless and sometimes deadly.
• Safety standards save lives.
• We've had multiple incidents of mass casualty because of improper safety standards.
• In the bill, cities and counties may still enforce health and safety standards, occupancy limits, and

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Commerce Committee approved minutes from February 17 and February 19, 2026, then heard extensive testimony on two short-term rental bills: Senate Bill 1263 and House Bill 583. The bills reflected competing approaches to local regulation of short-term rentals. SB 1263, sponsored by Senator Harris, would limit local governments to certain safety-related rules, require contact information for owners/operators, and restrict additional licensing or special regulations. Supporters said it balanced property rights with public safety and local enforcement needs, while opponents argued it would still create burdens, uneven rules, and unnecessary licensing. HB 583, sponsored by Senator Lakey, would more broadly prohibit local governments from singling out short-term rentals for special regulation, while preserving general health, safety, nuisance, and occupancy rules. Supporters framed it as a property-rights and anti-overreach measure; opponents said it would weaken local control and public safety protections, especially in resort communities. Testimony on both bills came from city officials, resort-city representatives, rental owners, fire and emergency personnel, and advocacy groups. Supporters of local regulation emphasized safety concerns such as smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, emergency contacts, inspections, parking, occupancy limits, and infrastructure impacts like sewer and water capacity. Several witnesses from resort towns described local ordinances as necessary to manage complaints, emergency response, and neighborhood impacts. Opponents of stricter local rules argued that short-term rentals are residential uses and should not face different treatment than long-term homes, and some described local ordinances as discriminatory or overly burdensome. A few witnesses also raised concerns about business licensing, caps, and requirements that could affect family income or small rental businesses. After testimony, the committee first considered SB 1263. Senator Guthrie moved to send it to the floor, but Senator Lakey offered a substitute motion to hold it in committee. After discussion, the substitute motion carried by a 5-4 roll call vote, and SB 1263 was held in committee. The committee then considered HB 583. A substitute motion to send it to the 14th order for possible amendment failed by a 7-2 vote. The original motion to send HB 583 to the Senate floor with a due pass recommendation then passed 8-1, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this bill is just to create a minimum floor of standards so that hospital emergency departments will
• sequencing, as Representative Anderson mentioned, testing for over 460 conditions far beyond what standard
• One baby born with a serious immune deficiency was not picked up by standard screening, and the child
• With this bill, Florida can set the gold standard for genomic sequencing.
• Further, it requires a standard plan by the department for getting parents' and guardians' information

Summary: The Health and Human Services Committee heard a lengthy agenda of health care and public health bills. The first major item was HB 649, which would remove the paper supervision protocol for certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and allow autonomous practice. The sponsor and supporters argued it would improve access, especially in rural areas, address workforce shortages, and reduce costs, while opponents from the medical community raised patient safety concerns and argued it would weaken physician oversight. After extensive testimony and debate, the committee reported the bill favorably by a vote of 18-7. The committee then unanimously advanced several other measures. HB 259, creating a special observance for fentanyl awareness and education, passed 23-0. HB 791, which codifies infant safety devices as an option for surrendering newborns and amends safe-haven law, passed as amended 25-0. HB 355, allowing schools to use FDA-approved emergency opioid antagonists rather than only naloxone, passed 26-0. HB 1119, requiring hospitals with emergency departments to adopt pediatric readiness policies, training, coordination, and assessment requirements, also passed 26-0 after two amendments. HB 431, changing the date for level-two background screening of athletic coaches to July 1, 2026, passed 26-0. Later, the committee approved CS for HB 907, the Florida Institute for Pediatric Rare Diseases or “Sunshine Genetics Act,” which would establish an opt-in newborn genome sequencing program at FSU and a statewide consortium for rare disease research; supporters emphasized earlier diagnosis and cost savings, and the bill passed 25-0. CS for HB 519, aligning state law with federal law on controlled substances for paramedics, passed 25-0. Finally, CS for HB 723, requiring the Department of Health to provide early-detection materials for type 1 diabetes to families of young schoolchildren, passed as amended 26-0. The meeting adjourned after all bills were reported favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• WHAT WE'RE DOING IS REPLACING THE LAWFUL DUTY STANDARD HERE WITH THE UNIFORM STANDARD IN 940.1 WHICH
• >> I DON'T THINK THAT'S CORRECT, WE'RE REPLACING IT WITH A STANDARD THAT ALREADY EXISTS IN 943.10 THAT
• STANDARD WILL BE THERE.
• 943.10 AND THAT DEFENSE BECAUSE OF THAT STANDARD STILL EXISTS IN COURT FOR FREE CONVECTION.
• WITH THAT 943.10, THERE IS NO STANDARD IN THAT SECTION.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's basically all state privacy laws with a single federal standard.
• It is a standard-setting body, effectively.
• They set the reliability standards for the electric industry.
• So there's a lot of standard development that's being developed.
• So there's a lot of standard development in it's being developed.

Summary: The committee held its first meeting on artificial intelligence and data centers, established a quorum, and heard introductory remarks from Majority Leader Hogue and the chair about the committee’s charge. Members said the goal was to build a factual foundation on AI, hear from experts and stakeholders, and develop practical North Dakota-focused recommendations rather than simply produce a large volume of bills. Legislative Council also reviewed interim committee rules and procedures before the informational presentations began. Staff and NCSL presenters then gave overviews of AI concepts and the state and federal policy landscape. The background memo and presentations covered AI categories and terms, state laws in areas such as consumer protection, algorithmic discrimination, deepfakes, chatbots, children’s safety, health, education, and government use, as well as data center siting and economic impacts. NCSL described a growing number of AI bills introduced and enacted across the states, with comprehensive laws in places like Utah, Colorado, Texas, California, and Illinois, and noted recurring issues around transparency, privacy, liability, and protections for minors. A major focus of the discussion was federal preemption and the tension between state regulation and national AI policy. NCSL said a recent White House executive order and related federal framework seek a light-touch, innovation-friendly national standard, with possible challenges to state laws and possible funding conditions tied to compliance, though no broad federal preemption has yet been enacted. Members asked about Commerce Clause concerns, industry pushback, oversight models, and whether AI policy is bipartisan; presenters said the issue cuts across party lines, with broad agreement on child safety and deepfake restrictions but more disagreement on broader regulatory approaches. No votes or formal actions were taken at the meeting, and the committee recessed briefly for technical issues during the second presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm a labor standards supervisor with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry at the labor standards
• I'm a labor standards supervisor with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry at the labor standards
• I'm a labor standards supervisor with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry at the labor standards
• I'm a labor standards supervisor Ali.
• </c> and Industry at the labor uh standards and Industry at the labor uh standards division.<00:43:19.680

Bills: HF3707, HF3732, HF2581, HF3731

Keywords: unemployment insurance, judicial officials, paid leave, economic development, worker protections, workforce development, unemployment benefits, youth training, grants, job creation, grant funding, revolving loan, underserved communities, disadvantaged groups, electrical licensing, installation, Class A installer, regulations, labor and industry, 1183

Summary: The committee first adopted the minutes from February 26 and then heard House File 2581, authored by Representative Frazier, which sought $1 million for Fortis Capital, a nonprofit economic development lender. Frazier and Fortis CEO Brian Smith described Fortis as a gap-financing lender that helps underserved entrepreneurs who cannot meet traditional bank underwriting standards. They said the organization has made 37 loans totaling more than $4 million since 2021, leveraged another $29.5 million, and created 314 jobs. Smith said Fortis typically charges around 6.5% interest, has had two defaults, and uses a revolving loan fund model that recycles repayments; members discussed how the proposal fits with other state economic development programs and whether Fortis should instead be part of a competitive grant process. The chair laid HF 2581 over for possible inclusion in a budget bill. The committee then heard House File 3707, brought by Representative Berg, which would extend confidentiality protections to unemployment insurance and paid leave judges and related staff by adding them to the definition of judges for purposes of protecting personal information. Berg and testifiers from the Department of Economic Development and MAPE said the bill responds to harassment and safety concerns, including threats, doxxing, and an attack near an office, and is intended to protect people making sensitive determinations. MAPE supported the bill as an update to existing protections for similar workers. Members raised concerns that the bill’s language was too broad, especially the reference to the paid leave division, and questioned whether it should cover only judges or also call-center and other staff. Department and committee members agreed the language likely needed narrowing and discussed possible amendments and whether to move the bill to Judiciary and then revisit it. No final vote was taken on HF 3707 during the discussion, and the bill remained under consideration for further language work.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, unfortunately, this standards board.
• Standards became effective January 1.
• </c> standards became effective January 1. standards became effective January 1.
• </c> nursing home workforce standard board. nursing home workforce standard board.
• c><02:20:31.920><c> is</c> nursing home standards board is nursing home standards board is something<

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The proposal on the table does remove the intentionality standard.
• The proposal on the table does remove the intentionality standard.
• It also removes the intentional standard for the misrepresentation of material fact.
• It does add negligence as a standard for that misrepresentation, as a means of providing some degree
• It also removes the intentional standard for the misrepresentation of material fact.

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Banking Committee met with Chair James Sanders Jr. and reviewed a full agenda of banking-related bills. Early action included approval of a bill requiring licensed check cashers to file suspicious activity reports, and a bill on civil penalties for fraud or misrepresentation in financial products or services, though several members objected to removing the intentionality standard and warned it could broaden enforcement too far and discourage lending in New York. The committee also advanced a bill prohibiting fees for periodic paper statements, a bill on asset-based lending transactions, and a bill requiring reporting of suspected financial exploitation. Members spent substantial time on a bill regulating automated lending decision tools. The sponsor and chair said the measure would allow AI use but require a human review or appeal if a borrower is denied, while some senators raised concerns about competitiveness for state-chartered banks and possible overlap with existing human oversight. The bill was reported out and referred to the Internet and Technology Committee for further review. The committee also approved a DFS study bill on the financial stability and licensing of the check-cashing industry, with a suggestion that the study also examine risks of expanding the industry. A major discussion centered on the “Deep Protection Act,” aimed at preventing foreclosures tied to deed theft. The sponsor described cases involving elderly homeowners and fraudulent transfers, while opponents argued the bill was vague, could create unintended consequences or private litigation, and might affect only a small share of mortgages because it applies to state-chartered institutions. The sponsor said the bill would be amended and noted interest in related county clerk reforms. The committee ultimately sent the bill to Judiciary. The final bills addressed mortgage payment schedule fees and unsolicited mail loan checks; both were approved. The meeting ended after the chair emphasized open debate and committee review as part of improving legislation.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1342 creates a new chapter in Title 25, establishing a minimum statewide standard for limited
• Again, this sets a minimum statewide standard, not a maximum, so if you like your chickens, you can keep
• The notwithstanding clause is standard in this piece of legislation.
• Standard drafting language used whenever the legislature establishes a statewide minimum standard.
• Madam Vice Chair, no, this is just setting a minimum statewide standard.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Agricultural Committee first approved the February 12, 2026 meeting minutes by voice vote. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1342, sponsored by Senator Nichols, which would create a statewide minimum standard allowing owner-occupants of detached single-family residences to keep up to four hens for household egg production, while preserving local and HOA authority over sanitation, enclosure, noise, odor, pest control, nuisance, and rooster restrictions. Nichols said the bill was a narrower version of a prior proposal and was intended to support food security, agricultural literacy, and self-reliance, with prospective application only. Testimony was mixed. Supporters argued the bill would protect basic homeowner freedoms, strengthen food security, and help families teach children about food production; one supporter also framed it as a national security and self-sufficiency issue. Opponents, including a representative of the Idaho Community Association Institute and the Association of Idaho Cities, said the bill would override private CC&Rs and local control, could create nuisance and health concerns, and lacked a minimum lot-size requirement, making chicken keeping impractical on some lots. A Nampa city councilman testified in support, emphasizing that the bill preserves local regulation while setting a state floor. In committee questions, senators asked about how the bill would affect existing HOA rules, whether it would apply retroactively, how rooster restrictions would work, and how it differed from a similar bill considered the previous year. Nichols said the bill would not disturb final enforcement actions before July 1, 2026, would not force immediate changes to existing HOA rules, and was intended only as a statewide floor. The committee then voted to send Senate Bill 1342 to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation; Senator Taylor opposed the motion, while the motion passed by voice vote.