Transcript Highlights:

• That doesn't necessarily mean their car is polluting.
• That doesn't necessarily mean their car is polluting.
• achieve those emissions reductions achieve those emissions reductions somewhere<02:12:00.520>
• The air pollution abatement fund, yes.
• pollution the vehicle air pollution pollution the vehicle air pollution abatement<03:28:28.199><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Transportation Committee opened its public hearing with HB 249, sponsored by Representative Seth Miller, which would allow bicycles, human-powered vehicles, and electric bicycles to treat stop signs as yield signs and red lights as stop signs in certain situations. Miller argued the bill would improve cyclist safety and traffic flow at no cost to the state, citing Idaho and Delaware as examples where similar laws were associated with fewer injuries and crashes. He emphasized that the proposal would remain optional for cyclists, who would still be required to yield to cross traffic and obey right-of-way rules, and said the bill is intended to help riders maintain momentum and avoid the instability that comes from repeatedly starting from a full stop. Committee members raised concerns about uncertainty for drivers and pedestrians, liability, and whether the bill would create a special class of road users with different rules. Representative Crawford asked about the red-light left turn language, and Miller explained it was included because bicycles may not trigger some traffic signals. Representative Hill questioned how other road users would know what a cyclist intended to do at an intersection, and Representative Gon noted the bill did not appear to address liability the way some motorcycle-related laws do. Miller responded that cyclists would still be expected to yield appropriately and said he would be open to an amendment if liability language was needed. Representative Emble also questioned whether the bill would create a special vehicle class, and Miller replied that bicycles already have different roadway rules and that the bill was meant to improve safety and flow. Several supporters testified in favor of the bill. Michael Frank, a cyclist and League cycling instructor from Spofford, said he regularly rides a cargo bike for errands and that stopping fully at intersections leaves him exposed longer and makes it harder to restart on hills. He said the bill would let cyclists slow, assess traffic, and proceed safely while maintaining momentum, and noted that he had not personally received a ticket for rolling through a stop sign, though he had been warned by police. Tim Blagden, former head of the Bike-Walk Alliance of New Hampshire, said the bill reflects how many people already ride, saves energy, and helps bicycles move through intersections faster and more safely. No vote or committee action was taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:24:37.360> in improvements for reductions in improvements for reductions in greenhouse
• <00:29:15.279> of those goals is the reduction of those goals is the reduction of greenhouse
• How are we achieving that reduction?
• chair Representatives the um reduction chair Representatives the um the<00:32:25.240> reductions<
• It's twofold: it's not only the reduction of greenhouse gases, it's also a reduction of the VMT per capita

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The executive budget includes $475.5 million, reflecting reductions across multiple facility categories

Bills: SB2901, SB2902, SB2903, SB2904, SB2905, SB2906, SB2907, SB2908, SB2909, SB2910, SB2911, SB2912, SB2913, SB2914, SB2915, SB2916, SB2917, SB2918, SB2919, SB2920, SB2921, SB2922, SB2923, SB2924, SB2925, SB2926, SB2927, SB2928, SB2929, SB2930, SB2931, SB2932, SB2933, SB2934, SB2935, SB2936, SB2937, SB2938, SB2939, SB2940, SB2941, SB2942, SB2943, SB2944, SB2945, SB2946, SB2947, SB2948, SB2949, SB2950, SB2951, SB2952, SB2953, SB2954, SB2955, SB2956, SB2957, SB2958, SB2959, SB2960, SB2961, SB2962, SB2963, SB2964, SB2965, SB2966, SB2967, SB2968, SB2969, SB2970, SB2971, SB2972, SB2973, SB2974, SB2975, SB2976, SB2977, SB2978, SB2979, SB2980, SB2981, SB2982, SB2983, SB2984, SB2985, SB2986, SB2987, SB2988, SB2989, SB2990, SB2991, SB2992, SB2993, SB2994, SB2995, SB2996, SB2997, SB2998, SB2999, SB3000

Keywords: geological subsurface characterization, groundwater, geothermal resources, environmental review, Hawaii groundwater and geothermal resources center, scientific research, non-extractive, public trust doctrine, clean energy, greenhouse gas, carbon sequestration, climate change, energy policy, Hawaii state energy office, emissions reduction, sustainable development, fare-free transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, public transit, tax on petroleum

Bills: SB2901, SB2902, SB2903, SB2904, SB2905, SB2906, SB2907, SB2908, SB2909, SB2910, SB2911, SB2912, SB2913, SB2914, SB2915, SB2916, SB2917, SB2918, SB2919, SB2920, SB2921, SB2922, SB2923, SB2924, SB2925, SB2926, SB2927, SB2928, SB2929, SB2930, SB2931, SB2932, SB2933, SB2934, SB2935, SB2936, SB2937, SB2938, SB2939, SB2940, SB2941, SB2942, SB2943, SB2944, SB2945, SB2946, SB2947, SB2948, SB2949, SB2950, SB2951, SB2952, SB2953, SB2954, SB2955, SB2956, SB2957, SB2958, SB2959, SB2960, SB2961, SB2962, SB2963, SB2964, SB2965, SB2966, SB2967, SB2968, SB2969, SB2970, SB2971, SB2972, SB2973, SB2974, SB2975, SB2976, SB2977, SB2978, SB2979, SB2980, SB2981, SB2982, SB2983, SB2984, SB2985, SB2986, SB2987, SB2988, SB2989, SB2990, SB2991, SB2992, SB2993, SB2994, SB2995, SB2996, SB2997, SB2998, SB2999, SB3000

Keywords: geological subsurface characterization, groundwater, geothermal resources, environmental review, Hawaii groundwater and geothermal resources center, scientific research, non-extractive, public trust doctrine, clean energy, greenhouse gas, carbon sequestration, climate change, energy policy, Hawaii state energy office, emissions reduction, sustainable development, fare-free transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, public transit, tax on petroleum

Transcript Highlights:

• The enact in adequately treated wastewater can be a significant source of pollution that contributes
• This preemptive state mandate is not the solution to our state's plastic pollution crisis, especially
• Pollution controls would cost hundreds of millions of millions of dollars.
• Local governments want action on plastic pollution. This bill does not do that.
• And yet here I am not, you know, using myself as an example, I am polluting and I'm bringing something

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• external costs from climate pollution external costs from climate pollution from<04:56:48.080>
• to charge the US uh for our pollution to charge the US uh for our pollution when<04:57:44.718>
• building a wall around free polluting building a wall around free polluting countries<04:58:02.718
• <05:03:23.040> and and and that discourages polluting and and and that discourages polluting
• Okay, Representative Kaplan has a question. pollution. Um so we all know that solar pollution.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• pollution does.
• That showing that oil and gas pollution leads to respiratory illness.
• Will it lower pollution from levels it's at now?
• Would you agree that that's one of the sources of vehicular pollution? Mr.
• Towards holding polluters accountable. So, that's just I point that out, Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• countries for their pollution at the border, so that their pollution will raise the cost of goods from
• reduction targets.
• reduction targets.
• what<01:44:10.639> we pollution reduction targets so what we pollution reduction targets
• country uh for our pollution when we country uh for our pollution when we export<01:44:49.679> goods

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 233, which would impose transparency and reporting requirements on the New Hampshire Vaccine Association. The prime sponsor, Representative Comto, said the bill and a proposed amendment were intended to increase public access by requiring a physical meeting location, making meetings available online, and publishing a complete list of vaccines and pharmaceutical products purchased. She argued the association should be more transparent because it is involved in vaccine purchasing and public trust is important, especially given controversy around vaccines. Committee members questioned the sponsor about the association’s legal status, who sets vaccine requirements, whether other private entities would be covered, and whether the proposal should instead apply more broadly to all meetings or include recordings. The sponsor said the association was created by the legislature, that childhood vaccine requirements come from DHHS and CDC-related processes, and that she would be open to broader recording requirements. Some members raised concerns about misinformation and whether requiring answers to public questions could be problematic in a contentious policy area. Patrick Miller, executive director of the Vaccine Association, and attorney Mark McHugh testified in opposition. They described the association as a not-for-profit voluntary corporation created by statute in 2002 to serve as a funding mechanism for the state’s universal childhood vaccine purchase program, with no policymaking role and no public funding. They said the association already posts notices, agendas, minutes, and allows public webinar access and comments, while also providing annual audits and reports and other statutory reporting. They argued HB 233 would impose unnecessary administrative costs on a private entity, interfere with its limited charitable purpose, and ultimately increase costs borne by insurers, employers, and consumers. No vote or final action was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• It should have been spent by the polluter. Thank you. >> Further discussion?
• It should have been spent by the polluter. Thank you. >> Further discussion?
• It should have been spent by the polluter. Thank you. >> Further discussion?
• It should have been spent by the polluter. Thank you. >> Further discussion?
• I think the Criminal Justice position will quickly lead to a dramatic reduction in harmful derivative

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Incinerators nearby create the risk of pollutants settling into surface water, wetlands, and settling
• But we do know that they release pollutants, including Representative Bartleman: Dioxins, hydrochloric
• acid, and elevated lead, mercury, cadmium, and CO2 pollutants that can and do affect sensitive wetland
• It's the pollutants, but I believe that we're going to get this right because we have two problems here
• And we do a lot with enhanced nutrient reduction systems. These are just your legacy systems.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's reductions in claims.
• Next up, HB 295, Comprehensive Waste Reduction Recycling Plan, by Representative Casello.
• Comprehensive Waste Reduction Recycling Plan by Rep. H.B. 295.
• Comprehensive waste reduction recycling plan by Rep. Casello.
• Phosphate land potentially be released from any and all liability related to other pollutant discharge

Summary: The Natural Resources and Disaster Subcommittee met for its first meeting of session and heard four bills. HB 209, the State Parks Preservation Act, would limit development in state parks and require stronger public notice and participation for land management plan changes. Members discussed protections for cabins and existing lodging, and an amendment aligned the bill with the Senate and clarified conservation-based recreational uses. Support came from Audubon Florida, Nature Conservancy, and others, and the bill was reported favorably with committee substitute after a unanimous roll call. HB 143 would create a Florida Resilient Buildings Tax Credit for new construction and retrofits that meet LEED-based resiliency standards, with a new advisory committee under DBPR to help administer the program. An amendment moved the process under DBPR, added UCF and FIU to the advisory council, and made technical conforming changes. The bill drew supportive testimony from a Boca Raton city council member and was reported favorably with committee substitute, with one no vote. HB 295 would direct DEP to develop a comprehensive waste reduction and recycling plan based on its 2020 recycling report, including education, market development, and recommendations for statutory changes. Testimony emphasized that the plan would be voluntary and would not impose costs or mandates on homeowners or businesses. The bill passed without amendments and was reported favorably. HB 585 would let owners of former phosphate mining lands record notice and obtain a Department of Health radiation survey to support a narrow defense against strict liability claims; an amendment clarified the notice content and limited the definition to mined lands, not gyp stacks. The bill drew extensive questions about notice, radiation thresholds, disclosure to buyers, and liability scope, but supporters from Mosaic, the Florida Chamber, and a health physicist argued it would improve transparency and help redevelop lands. It was reported favorably with committee substitute, with one soft yes and one no vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• going in into the uh pollutants going in into the uh atmosphere<00:26:00.080> that<00:26:00.200
• of our atmosphere by methane pollution of our atmosphere by methane and<00:43:36.640> carbon
• <01:10:35.960> habitat through noise pollution habitat through noise pollution habitat destruction
• dystopian future decrease air pollution dystopian future decrease air pollution and<02:20:08.280
• There's no pollution. Come to us. We're going to save the world, whatever.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Since there is no funding, it focuses on greenhouse gas reductions... ...and ensures that the critical
• It's twofold: that's not only the reduction of greenhouse gases, it's also a reduction of VMT per capita
• It's twofold: that's not only the reduction of greenhouse gases, it's also a reduction of VMT per capita
• It also saves money—$91 billion by 2050 if we can hit our 20% reduction per capita.
• If we can hit our 20% reduction per capita.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 748, a bill revising Minnesota’s transportation greenhouse gas and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact assessment requirements for trunk highway projects. The chair first moved and adopted the A2 author’s amendment and then the A3 amendment, which was described as adding implementation time and project exemptions when federal dollars are available. The bill author explained that the measure responds to concerns from stakeholders that the current law can force costly mitigation, delay or stop safety and capacity projects, and create uncertainty because key implementation details are still being developed by a technical advisory committee. Testimony was split. County and city engineers, county commissioners, the Minnesota Transportation Alliance, and the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities generally supported the bill, arguing that the current requirements can add 20% to 40% or more to project costs, are difficult to administer, and could jeopardize critical safety improvements, congestion relief, and federal funding. They cited examples such as Scott County and Trunk Highway 65, and said VMT mitigation is especially hard to quantify and fund. Opponents, including Move Minnesota and Sierra Club, argued that safety and climate goals are not in conflict, that reducing driving can save lives and reduce pollution, and that the bill would weaken an important tool for cutting transportation emissions. Members also asked about how GHG and VMT are measured, whether the required assessment was ready, and who would be responsible for mitigation assets and costs. After discussion, the committee held a roll call vote. The bill, as amended, passed 8-7 and was moved to the General Register.

Transcript Highlights:

• At the same time, it leads to pollution of our water supplies.
• Should alternative proteins lead to reductions in livestock intensification and the expansion of grazing
• It's important to note that without reductions in costs that would facilitate an increase in alternative
• is the single largest source of methane release, reducing livestock numbers is key to the rapid reduction
• , a wholesale shift from livestock to plant-based food production by 2050, and the corresponding reduction

Summary: The Select Committee on Alternative Protein Innovation held its first informational hearing to examine the state of alternative protein research, industry growth, and policy needs in California. The chair opened by noting California’s $5 million public investment in UC research in 2022 and framed the hearing around three panels: the climate, environmental, and security potential of alternative proteins; industry scaling and commercialization; and university-led research and workforce development. Members emphasized that the committee will continue with site visits and additional hearings across the state. The first panel focused on the case for alternative proteins as a climate, land, water, biodiversity, and food-security solution. Shana Fertig of the Good Food Institute argued that plant-based, fermentation-derived, and cultivated proteins can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and water use while helping California meet its climate and conservation goals. Zane Swanson of CSIS added that alternative proteins could reduce risks tied to zoonotic disease, antimicrobial resistance, supply-chain disruption, and broader national security concerns. In questions, members discussed the role of pharmaceuticals in animal agriculture and how alternative proteins might complement, rather than replace, traditional farming by creating new markets for California crops and helping farmers diversify. The second panel featured industry leaders Ethan Brown of Beyond Meat, Myra Passick of Upside Foods, and Arye Elfenbein of Wildtype. Brown highlighted plant-based meat’s health and climate benefits, criticized misinformation campaigns against the sector, and urged better labeling, reduced subsidies for factory farming, and more plant-based food in public institutions. Passick described cultivated meat as a scalable food-production technology, said Upside Foods has already produced millions of pounds annually at its Emeryville facility, and asked for grants, low-interest loans, and possible participation in cap-and-trade or similar revenue programs. Elfenbein described cultivated seafood as a way to address overfishing, contamination, traceability problems, and the heavy import dependence of the U.S. seafood supply, while also noting conservation benefits and the need for California to remain a hub for the industry. The final panel centered on research and workforce development. UCLA’s Amy Rowat described state-funded work on technical bottlenecks such as growing fat cells and creating edible scaffolds, along with a Future Food Fellows program that trains students across science, engineering, law, and policy. UC Santa Cruz economist Galina Hale argued that alternative proteins are necessary to meet future protein demand while reducing food-system emissions, and said California must support the sector through grants, loans, procurement, and research centers to avoid losing leadership to other states and countries. The hearing ended with the chair thanking the witnesses, noting that all materials would be posted online, and saying the committee would continue building policy and budget proposals to support the sector.

Transcript Highlights:

• uh all right water pollution uh all right water pollution so<05:23:14.680> um<05:23:15.120
• That's the relative to water pollution and waste disposal.
• <05:35:53.680> and<05:35:53.878> waste pollution and waste pollution and waste disposal
• And I know there's PFAS pollution-related money in there.
• <05:57:36.600> right mtbe pollution right mtbe pollution right groundwater<05:57:38.920>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up a House Bill 2 amendment to remove a bail-related section that had already passed in another bill and was now considered duplicative. Members discussed the earlier change to how bail commissioners are reimbursed, concerns that the Judiciary was losing money collecting the fees, and whether the magistrate-related language would still be needed. They noted the bill had already crossed over to the Senate, that the section was obsolete, and that any remaining issue about magistrates’ five-year terms might need to be raised with the Criminal Justice Committee. Amendment 997H, deleting section one, was moved, seconded, and adopted unanimously. The committee then reviewed a package of HB 1 position transfers involving the Department of Environmental Services, Fish and Game, and the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. Staff explained that several positions were being shuffled to correct position numbers and align permitting functions, including one Fish and Game position moving back to Fish and Game, one DEES position remaining funded after ARPA money ends, and adjustments to hours for permitting and environmental services positions. Members discussed whether the Fish and Game position had been intended to be temporary, but ultimately agreed to accept the first four Environmental Services items and the last two Natural and Cultural Resources items as a package; that motion passed unanimously. They then also accepted sections 2 through 8 of HB 1 with the related amendments and footnote language. The committee next turned to dredge-and-fill fee changes in section 11, where one member objected to a 50% fee increase for seasonal docks, arguing it could discourage permitted work and might apply to repairs that only require notification. Staff said the increase was intended to help cover the cost of additional positions in future biennia, but members decided to hold that section for more information, including how many seasonal dock repair fees are actually collected. Finally, the committee began discussing HB 215 and a proposed tipping-fee/surcharge structure to make a solid waste accounting unit self-funded, with members saying the fee could offset about $2.9 million in general fund costs and support the grant program, but no final action was taken on that item in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Another really big grant that we have that is frozen at the moment is a climate pollution reduction grant
• Another really big grant that we have that is frozen at the moment is a climate pollution reduction grant
• Another really big grant that we have that is frozen at the moment is a climate pollution reduction grant
• Another really big grant that we have that is frozen at the moment is a climate pollution reduction grant
• particularly the climate pollution reduction grants and the Climate Smart Food Systems grant that the

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• AREAS THAT WEREN'T EFFECTIVE IN TREATING NUTRIENTS, GREAT FOR TREATING SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
• YOU WOULD NEED TO DO SOMETHING ELSE AND IN MOST CASES TO READ THE REACH THE OLD OBJECTIVE OF 55% REDUCTION
• 55%, THEN THERE ARE MANY THINGS YOU COULD DO TO BE ABLE TO GET CREDIT FOR WHAT WOULD BE A NET 55% REDUCTION
• BUT AS A PART OF THE TRADING PROCESS IS OFFERED THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE NUTRIENT REDUCTIONS IN THE
• FORM OF A MYRIAD OF OPTIONS IN THE RULE FROM OFF-SITE REDUCTIONS TO ON-SITE REDUCTIONS AND IN DOING

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We need to accelerate our lack of progress towards meeting our waste reduction goals.
• We need to accelerate our lack of progress towards meeting our waste reduction goals.
• We need to accelerate our lack of progress towards meeting our waste reduction goals.
• We need to figure waste reduction goals.
• the is the that add to the pollution the is the threat<00:50:52.319> of<00:50:52.640> pollution

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Environment and Agriculture Committee held a hearing on a non-germane amendment to SB 302, a Senate bill originally requiring background checks for solid waste and hazardous waste facility owners. Representative Patenza explained that the amendment was intended to preserve and separate out language developed for the governor’s budget proposal and HB 2 concerning a solid waste facility site evaluation committee, a moratorium, and related public-benefit/site-benefit provisions, so the policy would still have a vehicle if the budget language did not advance. He said the proposal reflects extensive work by the House, the governor’s office, and DES, and he was open to further changes to align with any budget conference committee outcome. Dr. Adam Finkele testified in support of the amendment and the underlying site evaluation concept, arguing that landfill siting decisions should be based on cost-benefit analysis that includes public harms, local impacts, and regional impacts rather than only private benefits. He praised the committee process and prior legislation requiring agencies to respond substantively to public comments, and said the new language improves on the governor’s version by moving the committee’s review earlier in the process and requiring more complete application information, including alternatives and impacts on nearby wells and aquifers. He also supported a three-year moratorium on new landfill applications, saying it would give the state time to address leachate, PFAS, waste reduction, and weak siting rules. Members asked about possible conference committee changes, the value of having a separate review body, and whether the new rules would invite litigation. Dr. Finkele said he would likely sue over the rules because he считает them too weak, but also said the legislature could fix the problems through other bills such as HB 77. He acknowledged that the site evaluation committee is not a perfect solution, but said it is a useful intermediate step between the agency and the courts and likely would meet only rarely if capacity need remains the main trigger for future landfill decisions. No vote or final action was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Especially those remediating pollution rather than actually causing it.
• It would lead to cleaning up more pollution by capping the generation and handling fee. amount of tax
• Leaving our communities continually polluted.
• , and previous High profile cases involving chromium six have been industrial pollution.
• We're not asking that the, Parts per billion reduction change in any way where the water agencies are

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I understand that as technology increases, we can find more pollutants and we can dig deeper.
• Kirk Adulka, Assistant Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency: Thank you, Mr.
• <01:16:44.880> We Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
• We Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
• Control Agency and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and uh<01:30:21.920> Mr.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all