Transcript Highlights:

• If this is such a swell idea, why didn't you propose it?
• Idea number 6. Before I present, Mr.
• He raised this idea again in July of 2020, or August of 2020.
• The idea has been roundly rejected by our partners in the region.
• And it's why the Saudis immediately rejected the idea.

Transcript Highlights:

• this is one of the more radical ideas this is one of the more radical ideas coming<01:21:08.000>
• :45.760> idea.
• idea. Is a bad idea. Represent Paige. idea. Is a bad idea. Represent Paige.
• So, this idea is not about a lot more.
• of these ideas? of these ideas?

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 1598 and an amendment, 2026-0463H. Elliott Barry and Nick Norman testified that the amendment reflected a hard-fought compromise balancing concerns from all sides, and they urged no further changes. With no questions from members, the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend the bill with the amendment to the full committee, 3-0, and closed the subcommittee. The housing committee then moved through several executive session bills. HB 1010 was amended with 2026-0274H, described as clarifying and implementing prior housing law (HB 631) governing residential units above office and retail space; the amendment was adopted unanimously and the bill was reported ought to pass as amended on a 17-0 vote and placed on consent. HB 65 was then voted ought to pass and also placed on consent, with members saying it was duplicative of the compromise reached on HB 1010. HB 1349 was reconsidered for a clarifying vote and again received unanimous support for its prior disposition, 17-0, and was placed on consent. The committee next took up HB 1523, which concerned homeowners associations. An amendment, 2026-0380H, removed Section 5’s Attorney General enforcement mechanism, added HOA conflict-of-interest approval language, and delayed the effective date to give stakeholders more time; it was adopted unanimously. The bill then passed 18-0 as amended and was put on consent. The committee also voted ITL on CACR 16, a constitutional amendment related to sleeping or homelessness issues, after debate over unintended consequences and whether it protected a basic right; the vote was 10-8, with a majority report assigned and a minority report to be written. Later, HB 108, dealing with inclusionary zoning, was voted ITL 10-8 after members argued the bill imposed unrealistic burdens and could halt development; a minority report was noted with amendment 0149H. HB 7, concerning ADUs and restrictive covenants, was also voted ITL 10-8 after discussion of unintended consequences and a proposed amendment to encourage second ADUs; it was sent to the regular calendar with a minority report and amendment 0289H. HB 1120, on water-related subdivision requirements, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent, with one member noting a study amendment had been offered. HB 1143, addressing housing-provider obligations and municipal enforcement powers, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent. Finally, HB 1145, a fee/tax proposal tied to housing development, was ITL’d 11-7; members debated whether it would discourage development, and a minority report was assigned.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, if you have ideas, don't hesitate to reach out and let us know.
• The list prices give you an idea of the cost for Wigovi, which is another GLP-1.
• Madam Chair, that basically gives you an idea. Are you going next?
• This gives you an idea of some strategies that we could add.
• Representative Anaya had a good idea this year that didn't go very far.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:23:23.600> is<00:23:24.320> full idea is full idea is full transparency<00:23:26.400
• So 60% of the residents of a community think it's a good idea, and 40% think it's a bad idea.
• So 60% of the residents of a community think it's a good idea, and 40% think it's a bad idea.
• to bring the idea up.
• bring the idea bring the idea up<00:54:26.040> uh<00:54:26.440> thank<00:54:26.599

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 118 in executive session and adopted Amendment 0882H, which would remove the House and Senate members from the Child Care Commission while leaving the commission in place. Members said the amendment was a continuation of earlier committee discussion and supported it as a needed change. The committee then voted 12-0 to recommend ought to pass as amended, and HB 118 was placed on consent. The committee next considered House Bill 142, dealing with Gold Star Mother’s Day. The sponsor explained that the bill was unnecessary because existing statute already directs the governor to issue a proclamation for Gold Star Mother’s Day and to urge appropriate observance, including flag-related ceremonies. Several members discussed how to ensure the proclamation and flag observance would happen and whether the committee report should note the existing statute. Other members said they would oppose killing the bill because the recognition was important. The committee voted 9-3 to table/ITL the bill, and HB 142 was declared inexpedient to legislate. The final major item was a public hearing on a non-germane amendment to House Bill 456, with a related draft amendment also discussed. The sponsor said the amendment would raise the annual membership allowance from $20 to $75, rename fees as dues, prohibit dues from being used to pay lobbyists, require NHMA dues to be brought before voters as a separate warrant article for transparency, and require separate accounting so lobbying funds are not co-mingled with other funds. Supporters said the goal was to keep taxpayer-derived money from funding lobbying while preserving non-lobbying services such as legal advice and training. Opponents argued the proposal was an overreach and would micromanage local towns. No vote was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• told them outside of school have no idea told them outside of school have no idea what<00:11:55.200
• So, I didn't My my idea parents' job.
• a very good idea. a very good idea. Thank<01:10:32.400> you.
• So, I'm open to that type of an idea. So, I'm open to that type of an idea.
• <02:40:19.840> of inherently opposed to the idea of inherently opposed to the idea of firearm

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We overburden them with lots of ideas.
• But the idea of changing this to a, you have to choose a party.
• Now, we'll say if this is in response to ideas of fraud.
• So I don't think it's a fraud issue, but the idea of Maybe we don't want everyone to vote.
• But that's the idea.

Bills: HB4104, HB3722, HB3787, HB3700, HB3701, HB3310, HB3404, HB2964, HB2398, HB3024, HB3499, HB3278, HB3279, HB3645, HB3649, HB2293, HB3260, HB3176, HB3177, HB3114, HB3172, HB3322, HB3323, HB4248, HB3720, HB2210, HB1322, HB1937, HB3301, HB4107

Keywords: Oklahoma criminal law, felony classification, Class B5, Class D1, sentencing enhancement, repeat offender, domestic violence, stalking, voyeurism, peeping tom, clandestine recording, hidden camera, privacy offense, sex offender registry, Sex Offenders Registration Act, protective order violation, animal cruelty, cockfighting, dogfighting, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• I think we also, you know, we have some ideas that, and let me, let me just, before we go through each
• I'm always open to ideas. If there's a better idea, hit me. Cool. I'm always open to ideas. Okay.
• If there's a better idea, hit me. Cool. Okay. I mean, I'm fine.
• They don't have to do any of that, but I would argue that it's a good idea.
• So I guess one can—you can you give me an idea of other language that you might have considered?

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Republican Senator Karin Housley has an idea on how to do just that, and she joins us now.
• So talk me through it and how the idea came to you.
• So talk me through it and how the idea came to you. Uh, thank you.
• So, I think uh it's a great idea. It didn't make it into the final bill.
• <00:03:02.239> It So, I think uh it's a great idea. It So, I think uh it's a great idea.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I had no idea until I got here this was a huge money maker for the state, and our communities need this
• <00:04:31.400> until<00:04:31.680> I in your community I had no idea until I in your
• community I had no idea until I got<00:04:32.080> here<00:04:32.600> this<00:04:32.720
• It was in the sports spending bill last year, so I'm not trying to say that this is all a bad idea.
• I just don't want us is all a bad idea I just don't want us to<00:09:01.000> uh<00:09:02.000>

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 169, which would change the tax structure for charitable gambling. Representative Robbins offered and the committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, described as a technical correction to ensure sports-themed tip boards are not inadvertently taxed under the bill. Robbins then presented the bill as a way to replace the current tiered combined net receipts tax on charitable gambling with a flat 5% rate, arguing charities were being overtaxed and that prior promises of relief had not been fully delivered. Chair Stevenson pushed back on several of Robbins’ factual claims, correcting the record on the status of E-pull tabs, the share of charitable gambling revenue they represent, and the amount of tax relief already enacted in 2023 and 2024. He said E-tabs were not eliminated, that the revenue split between paper pull tabs and E-tabs is closer to 45/55, and that charities had already received a $15 million tax cut plus savings from reduced developer fees. Robbins responded that the changes still significantly reduced revenue and that the bill was intended as a middle-ground approach. Testimony largely came from charitable gambling and veterans groups in support of the bill. Rachel Jenner of Allied Charities of Minnesota said nearly 1,000 charities depend on charitable gambling, cited high taxes and fees, and said many organizations were seeing revenue declines after the new E-pull tab rules took effect. Dr. Christy Jano of the American Legion Department of Minnesota said charitable gambling funds support veterans, youth, and community programs, and that a flat 5% tax would help posts continue those efforts. Members asked about the size of the revenue drops and how much gambling proceeds go to overhead and operating costs; Jenner said the losses varied by organization and that it was too early to know the long-term effect, while Jano said some expenses are used for property taxes and building upkeep. The committee then moved on to additional testimony, including Tim Angstrom, but no final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2008 came from the idea that, unfortunately, the library associations across this nation,
• seek out materials, programs, and exhibits that represent the widest possible diversity of genres, ideas
• , cultures, and forms. ...possible diversity of genres, ideas, cultures, and forms of expression.
• Likewise, libraries must remain welcoming spaces for diverse ideas, individuals, and community groups
• . ...for diverse ideas, individuals, and community groups, including exhibit areas and meeting rooms.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, guest recognitions, and a proclamation honoring Charlie Kirk on National Freedom Day, including remarks from Representatives Martinez, Gress, and Kolodin. The chamber also welcomed the Doctor of the Day, Dr. Nicholas Hawbaker, and several guest groups, including Carl Hayden High School students and agricultural representatives who highlighted Arizona agriculture, water, and hydropower issues. The House then moved through Committee of the Whole on two calendars. On the first calendar, HB 291, HB 2104, and HB 2105 each received do-pass recommendations, while HB 2016 and HB 2022 were retained on the calendar. On the second calendar, members debated HB 2008, a bill concerning public funding and libraries; supporters said it would prevent public money from supporting politically biased or sectarian material, while opponents argued it was part of a broader effort to censor and defund libraries. HB 2008 passed Committee of the Whole on a 33-23 division. HB 2046, HB 2116, and HB 2132 also received do-pass recommendations, and HB 2142 was retained. On third reading, HB 2148, relating to federal monies, passed the House by a vote of 33-25 with two not voting and was sent to the Senate. The House adopted the Committee of the Whole reports, referred several bills to engrossing, announced committee meetings and bill referrals, and then adjourned until 1:15 p.m. Monday, February 2, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• They spent two years working trying to find all the best ideas in jail planning.
• I have to respond to the really brilliant ideas in this report.
• And I really like the idea of having two hearings or two briefings in this.
• all the wonderful ideas, they don't really<00:32:34.840> come<00:32:35.120> from<00:32
• brilliant ideas in this this report. brilliant ideas in this this report.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Hawaiian Affairs heard several Senate concurrent resolutions. SCR 11, urging Congress to amend the Civil Rights Act to prohibit discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity, drew support from the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women and Pride at Work Hawaii, both of which backed the measure as a statement of equality and protection for LGBTQIA+ people. A member also reminded testifiers to keep signs and statements relevant to the measure. SCR 22, recognizing the 50th anniversary of the restoration of Ahu and Aliʻa, had no testimony. SCR 58, calling for a progressive enforcement framework for parking violations in DLNR boating and ocean recreation lots, drew strong support from multiple testifiers who argued that towing is overly punitive, costly, and unfair to beach and harbor users; they favored warnings or smaller citations instead of towing and raised concerns about signage, contract oversight, and the cost of proposed enforcement technology. One member asked about whether DLNR could use HPD or other officers for citations, and the discussion focused on staffing and enforcement authority. The committee then heard SCR 60 SD1, requesting an update on the “Breaking Cycles” study on alternative rehabilitation and restorative justice models on Oahu. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation was not present, but the Corrections Reform Working Group strongly supported the resolution, saying the study reflects extensive community outreach and should not be shelved. Testifiers urged the committee to use the report to examine alternatives to a new jail, including diversion, pre-trial reform, probation reform, and renovations to existing facilities, and one testifier suggested amendments to add experts in those areas and technical assistance from the Prison Policy Initiative. Another testifier described Maui’s use of wraparound reentry services, prosecutorial discretion, and programming as an example of reducing incarceration without expanding jail capacity. SCR 184, asking the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission to examine anti-discrimination laws as applied to algorithmic and automated decision systems, had no in-person testimony, with the chair noting one support and one comment submitted. The final measure, SCR 89 SD1, which would create an advisory committee under the Hawaii correctional system oversight commission to develop recommendations on alternative rehabilitation and restorative justice models on Oahu, also had no testimony from the department, but the Corrections Reform Working Group supported it as a way to ensure community input into jail planning. A later testifier echoed concerns about building a large new jail and urged the committee to consider alternatives to incarceration and to include people with expertise in diversion, pre-trial reform, and probation reform. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that would be a good idea. Actually, I think that's a good idea.
• I think that would be a good idea. Actually, I think that's a good idea.
• I think that would be a good idea. Actually, I think that's a good idea.
• You could multiply that by 12 to get an idea of the run rate on that return.
• or bad idea.

Summary: The committee met to approve prior minutes and receive updates on the Legacy Fund transparency website and fund performance. Staff reported the website procurement was in contract negotiations, with a planned go-live around November 1, and that the site would provide downloadable, more transparent information on fund holdings, allocations, history, and legislative appropriations while protecting confidential data. The investment office then reviewed performance through January 2026, describing strong returns relative to benchmarks, noting real estate and fixed income as weaker areas, and explaining that the fund’s diversification and internal management had helped offset market volatility, including recent geopolitical impacts. Members also discussed the in-state investment program, especially the Bank of North Dakota’s CD-match allocation. Several members questioned whether the program had been static for years and whether the uncommitted balance should remain parked there if it was not being used. The committee voted to pause further transfers into the program until the Bank provides a report and the committee can consider possible statutory changes; the motion also requested a cost-benefit analysis from RVK, and it passed by roll call vote. In the afternoon, RVK presented its review of the investment policy statement as it relates to the in-state investment program. The consultant said it found no major policy impediments, and that implementers and stakeholders generally felt the program was proceeding as intended. RVK emphasized best practices such as third-party due diligence, competitive risk-adjusted returns, diversification, pacing, and exit strategies, while cautioning that required lower-return investments or spending commitments can create pressure on the fund’s long-term real value. The consultant also raised ancillary concerns about state-level concentration risk, the need to distinguish between public and commercial infrastructure, and the lack of a central repository for all state funding commitments to the same projects.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, well, we had some ideas to implement this bill that would also increase the opportunity to capture
• So the idea is that we would use the existing infrastructure with Hawaii's 211 and Aloha United Way to
• So, thank you. well, we had some ideas to implement well, we had some ideas to implement this<00:02:25.120
• So the idea is that we jurisdiction.
• >> Um, well, we think it's a great idea. >> Um, well, we think it's a great idea.

Bills: SB2055, SB2152

Keywords: civil rights, helpline, investigator, data analysis, Aloha United Way, reporting, confidentiality, community support, mandatory retirement, Hawaii Constitution, judiciary, justices, judges, 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard SB 2055, which would create a Civil Rights Commission helpline for reports of harms from federal deployments in Hawaii and require annual reporting and a public hearing. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission supported the concept but said the bill should be broadened to cover civil rights and human rights violations more generally, and recommended using existing 211/Aloha United Way infrastructure. Testimony was largely in support, with a few opponents. Members focused on whether the proposed line was really a 24-hour legal hotline or a reporting/referral mechanism, what jurisdiction the commission would have over federal employees, and the estimated costs. The committee chair indicated the bill would move forward with amendments, including adopting HCRC recommendations and adding appropriations for Aloha United Way, database/website development, and staffing. The committee then heard SB 2152, a proposed constitutional amendment to raise the mandatory retirement age for state judges and justices from 70 to 75. Judge Robert D.S. Kim, the Office of the Public Defender, Earthjustice, Community Alliance on Prisons, the State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, United Public Workers, the League of Women Voters, ILWU Local 142, CARES, and others testified in support, arguing that experienced judges improve stability, reduce vacancies, and preserve institutional knowledge. Opponents or skeptical comments were limited, but one member questioned whether the measure was just a temporary fix rather than a broader solution to judicial succession and mentoring. Members also asked about existing retention and fitness safeguards, including Judicial Selection Commission retention hearings and the Commission on Judicial Conduct’s ability to investigate complaints about a judge’s physical or mental ability to serve. The discussion noted that the measure would still leave those processes in place. No final vote on SB 2152 was taken in the portion provided, but the committee appeared to be moving toward decision-making after questions concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• My idea is that $700 million be invested in New Mexico.
• So I think that that's a good idea. Going to the baby bonds, I think it's a good idea.
• I like the idea of the incentive for individuals.
• I do have a creative idea of doing it.
• First of all, I appreciate the idea of financial literacy. I think that's a great idea.

Transcript Highlights:

• This idea that you have, I do believe that this is a possible solution for health care.
• We are bringing a set of ideas to you today. They are not fully developed.
• Do we have an idea? Madam Chair, Senator Pinto, that has been a concern.
• So there's that one idea of cooperative funding.
• The first is ideas and concepts, and the second is ways to pay for those ideas and concepts.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so, the idea here is to be respectful of the law that was passed in 2023.
• On the cost and expense part, I'm open to language ideas you might have.
• It is simply to explore the idea of what that could potentially look at.
• across a spectrum of ideas. across a spectrum of ideas.
• Led to an idea with the transitioning communities of all eight of them.

Bills: HF4308, HF4153, HF4703, HF4711

Keywords: HF4308, Monticello nuclear plant, Prairie Island, renewable development account, RDA, nuclear waste, spent fuel, dry cask storage, utility tax, commercial-industrial property tax, state general levy, property tax exemption, residential heating fuels, natural gas tax exemption, electricity sales tax exemption, year-round sales tax exemption, distributed solar energy standard, solar mandate, community solar, grid modernization

Transcript Highlights:

• I am supportive of this idea.
• I think it is uh ensuring that idea.
• Talk about the ideas.
• Let me know what about the ideas.
• a fabulous idea. So, thank you. a fabulous idea. So, thank you. Thank<01:12:16.159> you.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all