Video & Transcript : 'feedback mechanisms' :
Page 234 of 500
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 2/11/25
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- So to avoid feedback and different kinds of things, make sure it's in the off position when you're not
- So to avoid feedback and different kinds of things, make sure it's in the off position when you're not
- We've had positive feedback on that.
- This is based on feedback we got during the license pre-approval process.
- So this proposal, I think, reflects that feedback that we got during the process.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 01/22/25
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- The branch held a series of 19 feedback sessions, which involved more than 100 individuals representing
- The branch held a series of 19 feedback sessions, which involved more than 100 individuals representing
- The branch held a series of 19 feedback sessions, which involved more than 100 individuals representing
- Have you gotten any recent feedback on that? Is it still a concern?
- So I do think we're making progress. feedback on that is it is it still a feedback on that is it is it
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- We had over 13,500 responses, and they provided us with helpful feedback about what's important to them
- responses and they provided us with responses and they provided us with helpful<00:47:17.960><c> feedback
- c><00:47:18.400><c> about</c><00:47:18.839><c> what's</c><00:47:19.079><c> important</c> helpful feedback
- One big one is the financing mechanism. The original proposal...
- One big one is the financing mechanism. The original proposal...
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Corrections and Public Institutions Apr 20th, 2026 at 02:30 pm
Corrections and Public Institutions
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Corrections and Public Institutions Apr 20th, 2026
Corrections and Public Institutions
Transcript Highlights:
- worked with MSHSAA and other stakeholders to arrive at this version of the bill and appreciate their feedback
Summary:
The Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions held a public hearing and executive session on Senate Substitute No. 2 for Senate Bill 863. Senator Jason Bean presented the bill, which would create an Interscholastic Athletic Oversight Commission appointed by the Governor to hear certain appeals involving MSHSAA decisions, limited to eligibility matters such as athletic-transfer eligibility and contest procedures. He said the commission would provide an independent appeal avenue for parents, students, coaches, and school districts, could recommend rule changes, and would submit an annual report to legislative committees. Bean noted the bill had been worked on with MSHSAA and stakeholders and had passed the Senate 20-8.
Jim Foley of the School Administrators' Council testified in support, saying the group had worked through contentious issues and supported the bill because it focuses on appeals rather than operational control. No witnesses testified in opposition or for information only, and no committee questions were raised after the sponsor's presentation.
The committee then moved the bill do pass. The roll call vote was unanimous, 12 yeas and 0 nays, and Senate Substitute No. 2 for Senate Bill 863 was reported do pass. The committee then adjourned.
TX
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (03/31/2026)
Election Law and Municipal Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- One of the other changes we made after listening to feedback from districts was that publication in local
- :54:08.319><c> after</c><00:54:08.640><c> listening</c><00:54:08.960><c> to</c><00:54:09.119><c> feedback
- </c><00:54:09.599><c> from</c> we made after listening to feedback from we made after listening to feedback
- towns have already adopted official ballot voting for other questions that have no clear uniform mechanism
- to put the machine uniform mechanism to put the machine question<02:19:15.519><c> to</c><02:19:15.760
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (01/15/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- That's why you're hearing some of this feedback, particularly about Rochester, but it is not unique to
- </c> hearing some of this feedback hearing some of this feedback particularly<04:50:25.080><c> about<
- here and obviously take control of a process that's supposed to be quasi-judicial and really be a mechanism
- <c> for</c><05:05:44.360><c> citizens</c><05:05:45.160><c> to</c><05:05:45.360><c> open</c> be a mechanism
- for citizens to open be a mechanism for citizens to open records<05:05:46.000><c> and</c><05:05:46.160
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee met for its first meeting of the new session with opening remarks, member introductions, and a discussion of committee logistics. Members described their backgrounds and priorities, including criminal justice, right-to-know and privacy issues, domestic violence, death-with-dignity legislation, abortion, firearms, landlord-tenant policy, housing, and technology/privacy concerns. The chair noted there were already 34 bills assigned to the committee and expected more, and said the committee would likely continue to have a heavy workload this session.
The chair also outlined how the committee would operate: meetings would generally be on Wednesdays, with possible Mondays as needed; hearings would not require a quorum, but executive sessions would; and members were asked to provide updated phone numbers and email addresses, especially cell numbers. He explained that the committee would continue its practice of seating members in a mixed partisan arrangement to encourage communication, and that the new clerk had joined the committee.
A significant portion of the meeting focused on procedures for executive sessions and meeting times. The chair said the committee would follow the traditional rule allowing executive sessions on bills heard that day if proper notice was given, but he would avoid taking up controversial matters without full attendance. Members then discussed whether meetings should start at 9, 9:30, or 10 a.m., with concerns raised about long commutes, evening obligations, and winter driving after dark. No formal vote was taken in the portion provided, but the chair indicated he would try to accommodate the committee’s preference while balancing the workload.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement - 04/14/26
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- I am stuck in this plan, and without some mechanism to allow me to transition from one to the other or
- to allow me and without some mechanism to allow me to<01:25:40.640><c> transition</c><01:25:41.320><
- Um, and what could be a the right mechanism to get people to look at shorter vesting windows?
- Um, and what could be a the right mechanism to get people to look at shorter vesting windows?
- to get people to look at mechanism to get people to look at shorter<01:52:00.360><c> vesting</c><01:
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Economic and Rural Development Sep 4th, 2025
Economic & Rural Development & Policy Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- So during the feasibility study, we've had a number of public input sessions to gather feedback, and
- Maybe it's the feedback from the... Alright, everybody.
- We can ask them for support on grant reviews and also provide us with feedback about our programming
- We are always informed by this feedback loop of research.
- I have a feeling that's where the feedback is coming from. I'm muted. You are muted.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Artificial Intelligence Task Force 2025 (8-14-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, if we locate our project there, we will then study those lines, give them initial feedback on the
- We'll give them that feedback. have to locate near the transmission have to locate near the transmission
- /c> then study those lines, give them then study those lines, give them initial<00:14:15.680><c> feedback
- ><c> the</c><00:14:16.959><c> reality</c><00:14:17.360><c> of</c><00:14:17.519><c> a</c> initial feedback
- on the reality of a initial feedback on the reality of a data<00:14:17.920><c> center</c><00:14:18.240
Keywords:
Meeting Start - 00:00
Roll Call – 00:15
Approval of Minutes of the July 15, 2025, Meeting 00:55
Helping Power Kentucky’s Growth – 01:25
Powering and Deploying AI – 41:00
Fueling America’s Intelligence – 56:12
Adjournment – 01:10:37, 958, all
Summary:
The Artificial Intelligence Task Force met with a quorum, adopted prior meeting minutes, and then focused on energy policy and economic development as they relate to AI and data centers. John Bevington of LG&E and KU, introduced by Caroline Clark of LG&E/KU and PPL, described the utility’s Kentucky-only service territory, vertically integrated system, 1.3 million customers, and about 7.5 gigawatts of generating capacity. He said the company has supported 76 Kentucky projects in 2024 totaling about $3 billion in announced investment and roughly 3,000 jobs, with a large share of statewide announcements occurring in its service area.
Bevington said LG&E and KU’s current project pipeline is unusually strong, totaling about 170 projects and 8.5 gigawatts of requested power, with data centers accounting for about two-thirds of that demand. He broke the pipeline into existing customer expansions, new-to-Kentucky projects, and 20 data center projects representing about 5.6 gigawatts of potential load. He highlighted a Louisville data center project by PO Development Company and Powerhouse Data Centers that has announced a 400-megawatt facility and may expand to 525 megawatts, estimating that such a project could represent about $4 billion in investment. He also explained that large data centers generally must locate near transmission lines and that utilities must conduct studies, order long-lead equipment, and secure reimbursement commitments before proceeding so other customers are not harmed.
Members asked about how Kentucky compares with other states, the size of data center projects, and whether regulatory reform is needed. Bevington said the 20 projects reflect current Kentucky interest, which he attributed in part to the state’s sales tax exemption for data centers, and noted that states like Ohio have had similar incentives for years. In response to questions from Senator Thomas, he confirmed that data centers can vary in size and said the state should have a regulatory environment that supports economic development, while emphasizing that the benefits would flow to the state, local communities, and schools rather than just the utility. He also cited national and regional data suggesting data centers generate indirect jobs and tax revenue, and said LG&E and KU are investing in transmission, reliability, solar, and gas generation projects, including proposed additional 645-megawatt natural gas units and other system upgrades, to meet expected demand.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (02/05/2025)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- I thought I would wait for the committee's feedback and reaction.
- It's hard to tell what the feedback will be just yet. comes up is that a leny providing the comes up
- /c><01:49:34.560><c> the</c> it's hard to tell what the uh the it's hard to tell what the uh the feedback
- <01:49:35.159><c> will</c><01:49:35.320><c> be</c><01:49:35.599><c> just</c> feedback will be just feedback
- on how we records and give us feedback on how we need<02:56:59.840><c> to</c><02:57:00.600><c> move<
TX
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- In continuing conversations with the industry and TCQ and listening to stakeholder feedback, we made
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services Apr 3rd, 2025
Health & Human Services
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- And that's where, when we get farther along this path, I think that we can provide a lot more feedback
- We heard about the federal a little bit, but have any of you practiced under a different mechanism for
- We heard about the federal a little bit, but have any of you practiced under a different mechanism for
- We heard about the federal a little bit, but have any of you practiced under a different mechanism for
- Boy, wide open for feedback from the working groups.
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- I did receive some feedback among staff when writing this.
- I did receive some feedback among staff when writing this.
- We need some mechanism to stop that.
- /c><02:38:08.640><c> we</c><02:38:08.880><c> need</c><02:38:09.120><c> some</c><02:38:09.680><c> mechanism
- </c><02:38:10.240><c> to</c> into the LSR we need some mechanism to into the LSR we need some mechanism
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (04/14/2026)
Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- So we heard feedback that the 5-day and the 72-hour were not confusing, but that they should be the same
- , I guess, would be going mechanism, I guess, would be going public<01:29:05.600><c> with</c><01:29:05.920
- Isn't one of the enforcement mechanisms revoking the lobbyist privileges by the Secretary of State?
- Um isn't one of the<01:33:23.560><c> enforcement</c><01:33:24.080><c> mechanisms</c><01:33:24.760><c>
- revoking</c><01:33:25.480><c> the</c> the enforcement mechanisms revoking the the enforcement mechanisms
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 051 Mar 6th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- state may be running afoul of the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment because we do not have a mechanism
- state may be running afoul of the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment because we do not have a mechanism
- state may be running afoul of the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment because we do not have a mechanism
- mechanism mechanism back<01:16:51.120><c> in</c><01:16:51.360><c> place</c><01:16:51.760><c> where</
- And then also I was getting the same feedback that my colleague from Larimer was receiving and said it's
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (02/18/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- on the public hearings uh just feedback on the public hearings uh just just<00:37:09.560><c> want</c
- This term, I'm glad that we got a lot of good feedback on it and from our stakeholders, and from that
- feedback we figured out what we really need to do as a study committee.
- feedback we figured out what we really need to do as a study committee.
- The feedback was great. The only thing was, I effectively had created an outline.
Summary:
The Environment and Agriculture Committee opened by noting member absences and then reviewed the governor’s HB 2 trailer bill language creating a solid waste site evaluation committee. The chair explained that Finance would want the committee’s input on the proposal and also announced a temporary change to the committee’s schedule, with additional Wednesday meetings planned around school vacation. The committee then moved into a work session on several bills.
On HB 150, Representative Ktoa offered a simple amendment changing food-processing language from “washed and rinsed” to “cleaned and sanitized” in the processing area. Members agreed the change better matched food safety practice, and the committee indicated support for advancing the bill. On HB 307, dealing with homestead food production areas, members discussed proposed amendment language that would add clearer sanitary requirements, including handwashing access, sanitary storage, sanitizable food-contact surfaces, and pest exclusion. The committee also discussed whether to replace “potentially hazardous food” with “time temperature control safe food,” but several members favored keeping the existing term because it is already well defined in food safety law. The bill was held for further amendment work rather than being executed immediately.
The committee spent substantial time on solid waste legislation. For HB 479, members recalled a prior plan for a letter to the solid waste working group and agreed to proceed with the bill in executive session, with an offer of drafting help from Representative Bixby. For HB 77, which would require DES to establish site-specific setback distances for proposed new landfills, Representative Penza said his amendment was not ready yet but was close, and the bill was left for further discussion. The most detailed discussion was on HB 2115, which would require landfill permit applicants to submit a report on the project’s harms and benefits. Representative Germana explained an amendment that would replace section one, expand the list of benefits to include economic potential and infrastructure improvements, and set up a third-party review process in which the applicant submits a list of reviewers, DES screens the list, and the commissioner selects a reviewer if no agreement is reached within 60 days. Members asked about who could serve as contractors, whether they had to be local, and how DES would judge qualifications; the response was that environmental engineering and similar firms could be used, local or outside the community, and that the process would remain somewhat flexible. Representative H. Haskins asked whether the legislature or subcommittee would be formally notified of preliminary review problems, and the chair said no additional notification process would be built in beyond existing practice. The committee planned to continue work on the bills in upcoming executive sessions, including after school break.