Video & Transcript Research : 'evaluation'
Page 231 of 351
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- When he was evaluated properly by functional medicine like Dr.
AL
Alabama 2025 Regular Session
Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Feb 26th, 2025
Children and Senior Advocacy
Transcript Highlights:
- It's essential to keep these implications in mind as we discuss and evaluate the potential effects of
Keywords:
HB285, TJ's Law, traffic infraction, traffic ticket, uniform traffic ticket and complaint, minor driver, juvenile driver, parent notification, guardian notification, emergency contact, law enforcement, citing agency, traffic citation, driver safety, youth safety, Alabama traffic law, Section 12-12-56, Children and Senior Advocacy, House Judiciary, reasonable effort
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Higher Education Feb 19th, 2025
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Of evaluating the, the, the best performing asset of the last 10 years with a 60% Cer cumulative annualized
Keywords:
cryptocurrency, bitcoin, investment reserve, economic resilience, financial security, vehicle rental, damage waiver, consumer rights, business regulations, refund policy, telephone solicitation, telemarketing, text message marketing, SMS marketing, robotext, spam text, consumer protection, deceptive trade practices, DTPA, Business & Commerce Code
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- regulations about auditing on that side that make sure that the reason that they fell into those is re-evaluated
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Agriculture Jan 14th, 2025
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (05/27/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- You had mentioned when you said that the bill maintains the report and the evaluation.
- You had mentioned when you said that the bill maintains the report and the evaluation.
- But you've taken away a lot of the evaluation.
- But you've taken away a lot of the evaluation.
- In 2018, a evaluations for assessment.
Summary:
The committee opened hearings on SB 69, including a germane amendment on school board votes to accept or reject gifts and donations, and a non-germane amendment creating a virtual early childhood readiness family engagement program for preschool children not yet in kindergarten. Prime sponsor Rep. Glenn Cordelli said the literacy program was modeled on earlier HB 671, would be funded through gifts and donations rather than state appropriations, and would include reporting requirements to the governor and legislature. Members questioned changes from the earlier bill, including the move away from center-based language, the lack of a dollar threshold for school board action on donations, anonymous gifts, and whether the amendment preserved enough evaluation data.
Testimony on the donation provisions raised concerns about broad language, timing, and public-meeting requirements. Rep. Timothy Han and Becky Wilson of the New Hampshire School Boards Association both noted that school districts already have policies and asked how the bill would work for routine donations, anonymous gifts, and situations that might require non-public discussion under right-to-know law. Wilson cited examples such as field-trip scholarships, backpack drives, and sports uniforms, and said the association was not taking a position but wanted clearer guardrails. Rep. Han said school boards may need to discuss some gifts in non-public session and that the bill should better address those circumstances.
On the early literacy amendment, Wilson and others questioned whether the program was sufficiently developed, whether it was appropriate to rely on a primarily online model for very young children, and how it would interact with special education services and IEPs. A representative from Waterford.org, Rob Riley, testified in support, saying the program would be supplementary, adaptive, and family-engagement based, and that Waterford could provide devices and internet access for families who need them. He said the program would work alongside school districts and IEP teams rather than replace existing services. No vote was taken during the hearing; the chair said the committee would later exec the bills and try to get reports in for the calendar.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance Division III (03/28/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- of those appropriate<00:55:16.319>
assessments <00:55:16.720>and <00:55:16.960>evaluations - appropriate assessments and evaluations. appropriate assessments and evaluations.
- on the patients and and evaluations on the patients and and would<00:59:09.359>
also <00:59:09.680 - I think I recall that when people had a re-evaluation of what services they were eligible for, sometimes
- I recall that when people had a re-evaluation of what services they were eligible for, sometimes their
Summary:
The Division 3 work session focused largely on amendment 1176 to HB 2, which would have incorporated the substance of HB 548FN, a House-passed bill creating a direct-pay or membership-based model for health care facilities. Representative Mlan described the proposal as a way to increase competition in health care by extending the direct-care model used in primary care to facilities, arguing it could encourage innovation and that concerns about widespread harm to critical access hospitals were overstated. He pointed to Oklahoma’s long-standing Surgical Center model as evidence that the approach had not spread broadly or displaced hospitals there.
Several members and witnesses raised concerns. Representative Stringham questioned whether the model would shift profitable services and patients away from existing hospitals, potentially worsening their finances and affecting Medicaid-related funding. David Ross, speaking for county nursing homes, opposed the language because it also removed moratoriums on nursing home, skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation, and self-pay beds, warning that it could increase pressure on Medicaid rates and undermine community-based care. Ben Bradley of the New Hampshire Hospital Association said the proposal appeared to create a separate regulatory framework for direct-pay facilities and raised concerns about patient safety, CMS participation rules, and a separate patient bill of rights.
The chair concluded that, because HB 548 was already moving through the Senate, the HB 2 process was not the best vehicle for the policy and that the issue should be left to the Senate’s more deliberative committee process. Representative Ferski moved to not accept or remove amendment 1176 from the agenda, and the committee approved the motion by roll call, 9-0, withdrawing the item from HB 2.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Health and Human Services (02/05/2025)
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- you that I brought forward for you a research paper by the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Evaluation
- 04:09:55.439>
of <04:09:55.640>planning <04:09:56.000>and <04:09:56.720>evaluation - <04:09:57.399>
of Secretary of planning and evaluation of Secretary of planning and evaluation - <04:17:54.600>
uh <04:17:54.720>in <04:17:54.960>place There is an ongoing evaluation - costs that um Rob had evaluation costs that um Rob had mentioned<04:19:22.640>
and <04:19:22.760
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, June 9, 2026)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- passed S. 1157, an act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a review to evaluate
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
WLA, WLA DEFER Public Hearings 02-18-2026
Transcript Highlights:
- then we'll go to public hearing, hold the public hearing, then go back to the board for a final evaluation
- 43:37.920>
final go back to the board uh for a final go back to the board uh for a final evaluation - evaluation with the proposed rules. evaluation with the proposed rules.
- ever been, like, internal to DAR, like a group on the science side whose job it is to make those evaluations
- and to make those evaluations?
Summary:
The committee took up Senate Bill 3019, which would cap ticket resale prices at face value for events in Hawaii and authorize DCCA to enforce violations. DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection opposed the bill and said it preferred a ticket transparency approach focused on upfront disclosure of fees, while supporters argued the measure would curb scalping, bots, and extreme markups. Testimony from the National Independent Venue Association and a concert promoter emphasized that resale does not add inventory and said the bill would protect consumers; committee members questioned DCCA about enforcement and cited examples of very high resale prices for local concerts. No vote was taken in the excerpt, and the chair said the measure would be moved along for further consideration.
The committee then heard Senate Bill 3311, which would create the Strengthen Hawaii Homes Program within DLNR to fund fire-mitigation grants for residential property owners. DLNR supported the bill, saying the need is immediate and that the program is modeled on successful mainland efforts, though the department said it ultimately belongs under the State Fire Marshal once that office has capacity. DCCA’s Insurance Division submitted written comments only. The measure was received without further action in the excerpt.
Senate Bill 2979, authorizing DLNR and community-based organizations to enter community co-management agreements for state lands, drew broad support from OHA, community groups, and several individuals, who said the bill would formalize partnerships, strengthen shared responsibility, and help community stewardship efforts. Testifiers clarified that the bill does not require 65-year agreements and said the term should be left to DLNR’s discretion. The committee then moved on without questions or a vote shown in the excerpt.
Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 2351 on the state park special fund, which would allow DLNR to use fund monies for environmental protection programs. DLNR’s state parks administrator opposed the bill, saying the special fund is already fully committed to urgent maintenance and infrastructure needs across an aging park system, and warned that diverting money would weaken the fund’s ability to support parks. The Tax Foundation also submitted written testimony, and a community witness opposed the measure for similar reasons. The excerpt ends as the committee begins Senate Bill 2918, which would require HCDA to establish a community action center in Chinatown; HCDA’s executive director expressed concern about jurisdiction and said the city and county should continue leading that work.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
CPC-CPN Joint Info Briefing - Tue Jan 13, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- The Insurance Division evaluates whether insurer assets are being used appropriately, whether financial
- physicians are questioning is whether there's sufficient transparency at this stage to responsibly evaluate
- 19:11.320>
stage <01:19:12.240>to <01:19:12.400>responsibly <01:19:13.400>evaluate - at this stage to responsibly evaluate at this stage to responsibly evaluate the<01:19:14.240>
- Well, all those come to our emergency rooms now, and we evaluate them.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance (10/30/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- HB 215 was included pretty much in its entirety in HB 2 in connection with the solid waste site evaluation
- HB 215 was included pretty much in its entirety in HB 2 in connection with the solid waste site evaluation
- situation, we don't know who all the players are, and that's one of the things that needs to be evaluated
- c><03:03:19.680>
be one of the things that needs to be one of the things that needs to be evaluated - evaluated. Thank you. evaluated. Thank you.
Summary:
The Finance Committee met on October 30 to act on a series of bills that had been considered during the budget process, with many being recommended for inexpedient to legislate because their funding or policy language had already been handled in House Bill 2. Early actions were largely unanimous. House Bill 54, allowing alternate treatment centers to operate for profit, was recommended ought to pass and was approved 25-0, then placed on the consent calendar because it carried no appropriation. House Bill 97, a wastewater and infrastructure appropriation, was recommended inexpedient to legislate because its funding had been replaced in HB 2; Representative Rum opposed the motion and argued the grant funding helps local taxpayers and housing development, but the committee adopted ITL 14-11, with a minority report to follow. House Bill 111, dealing with the right-to-know ombudsman, was also unanimously recommended ITL because the budget had already made related reforms.
The committee then took up House Bill 164, and adopted Amendment 225-2979H, which appropriates $150,000 in FY 2027 to the Secretary of State’s Division of Archives and Records Management for a local government records manager position. The amended bill was then recommended ought to pass as amended and approved 25-0. House Bill 197, the Property Tax Relief Act, drew the most extended debate. Supporters said it would restore a state contribution to retirement costs for local employers and provide property tax relief, while opponents argued the earlier change was largely offset by employee contribution increases and other retirement-system adjustments. The committee ultimately adopted ITL 14-11, and a minority report was requested.
The committee also acted on House Bill 215, a landfill-related bill. Members explained that most of its language had been included in HB 2 but was removed in conference, so the bill was retained and amended to apply more narrowly to new landfills. Amendment 2025-2970H was adopted unanimously, and the bill was then recommended ought to pass as amended by a 25-0 vote. House Bill 216, which would change retirement eligibility rules for certain workers injured on the job, was recommended inexpedient to legislate after its sponsor said the fiscal impact was too uncertain to support. Finally, House Bill 219 received Amendment 2025-2988H to change its effective date to July 1, 2027, and discussion began on the bill’s broader purpose of returning about $5.7 million annually from RPS funds to ratepayers.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 1st, 2025
Congressional Redistricting, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- We must read and evaluate the prosperity of our... ...great state under each party.
- From those evaluations, the map would have been constructed.
- later found out about 24 hours later that there was a... ...And I don't know if they used AI to evaluate
- We were told that this information... ...was going to be evaluated by the public; I didn't know anything
- You were going to... evaluate the testimony, and then before the hood of the car was even cooled off
Bills:
HB4
Keywords:
district composition, congressional election, Texas, legislature, voting districts, 997, house, all
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Executive Departments and Administration (01/28/2026)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Any one of you could put in a variance process right now, and we would evaluate it and decide if it there's
- Any one of you could put in a variance process right now, and we would evaluate it and decide if it there's
- Any one of you could put in a variance process right now, and we would evaluate it and decide if it there's
- Any one of you could put in a variance process right now, and we would evaluate it and decide if it there's
- Any one of you could put in a variance process right now, and we would evaluate it and decide if it there's
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Public Works and Highways (01/20/2026)
Public Works and Highways
Transcript Highlights:
- So, as bids come<03:19:51.920>
in, <03:19:52.479>we <03:19:52.800>re-evaluate <03 - :19:53.439>
the <03:19:53.760>projects come in, we re-evaluate the projects come in, we - re-evaluate the projects that<03:19:54.319>
are <03:19:54.479>in <03:19:54.640>the< - We have a ranking system that we use to go through and evaluate the projects.
- go through and evaluate the projects. go through and evaluate the projects.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (01/12/2026)
Education Policy and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, on item three, the demonstration or accountability phase of this, who actually does the evaluation
- So, not the eligibility, David, but who's actually going to evaluate the documentation.
- this, who actually does the evaluation? this, who actually does the evaluation?
- but the who's actually going to evaluate but the who's actually going to evaluate the<00:16:40.560
- That means everything from identification and evaluation, and a team which includes their parents, an
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <05:45:45.680>
many <05:45:46.080>house <05:45:46.400>pass available to evaluate - many house pass available to evaluate many house pass bills.
- Some have suggested the bill goes beyond what's necessary, but the committee took great pains to evaluate
- Some have suggested the bill goes beyond what's necessary, but the committee took great pains to evaluate
- Some have suggested the bill goes beyond what's necessary, but the committee took great pains to evaluate
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, June 3, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- That solicitation lays out what the agency wants to buy, how it evaluates the bids, and when responses
- agency wants to buy, how it evaluates agency wants to buy, how it evaluates the<03:53:03.520>
- <07:40:51.840>
But <07:40:52.080>let's <07:40:52.320>evaluate <07:40:52.878>< - But let's evaluate the chat with OM.
- But let's evaluate the legacy<07:40:53.760>
that <07:40:54.080>leaves <07:40:54.398>
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (02/19/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- c><05:01:09.760>
a <05:01:09.920>a <05:01:10.040>medical epidemiology when evaluating - a a medical epidemiology when evaluating a a medical intervention<05:01:11.000>
or <05:01:11.280 - into place by national and local public health agencies without evidence of benefit and without evaluation
- Anarie Banfield. evidence of benefit and without evidence of benefit and without evaluation<05:05:00.160
- of risks and were followed by evaluation of risks and were followed by school<05:05:02.280>
boards
Summary:
The committee opened with House Bill 184, which would create a committee to study changing school start times. Members discussed Amendment 0394, which made the study committee’s duties more investigative and adjusted reporting recipients, including the Governor. Several members raised questions about whether the committee should review evidence-based studies, local district decisions, and existing district reports; supporters said the amendment would better allow the committee to gather information and recognize local control. The amendment passed 17-0, and the bill as amended also passed 17-0. Representative Litchfield noted that no one had testified in opposition and encouraged the future study committee to review an Oyster River School District report on school start times.
The committee then took up House Bill 394, concerning cooperative school district budget committees and board member representatives. Amendment 0476 was adopted 17-0 after discussion that it clarified the bill’s language and reflected work with the School Boards Association. The committee then voted OTPA on the bill, which also passed 17-0. House Bill 738, requiring background checks for employees and volunteers at certain non-public schools or education service providers receiving public funds, was moved inexpedient to legislate. Supporters said the bill would create practical and legal problems for private citizens and homeschooling families, and the motion passed 15-2 with no minority report, placing the bill on consent.
The committee next considered House Bill 235, which would amend the educator code of ethics and conduct to add responsibilities to parents. Supporters argued parents should be explicitly included in the code, while opponents said parents were already covered in existing ethics language and statute. The bill passed narrowly, 9-8. The committee then returned to House Bill 532 on alternate dispute resolution and individualized education plan team meeting facilitation. Amendment 0480H clarified that different rules would apply separately to neutral conference, mediation, and IEP facilitation; it passed 17-0, and the bill as amended also passed 17-0. Finally, the committee moved to House Bill 564, concerning adoption of school administrative unit budgets, and voted to retain the bill for further review because members said there was still confusion about how it would apply to single-district and multi-district SAUs.