Transcript Highlights:

• Um, so this project is actually a mandatory set-aside for Homeland Security grant funds.
• Both of these programs will fill up probably with the first day of open registration, right?
• <00:10:18.440> where to start with a basic ASIM program where to start with a basic ASIM program
• So, we trained program was sustainable.
• <00:14:22.360> um apply for this grant um apply for this grant um to<00:14:23.360> help

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The Joint Fiscal Committee met on May 15 at 10:00 a.m. and first approved the April 17 minutes. It then took up a consent calendar covering tabs three through seven, with items 089 and 097 removed for separate discussion. The committee approved the remainder of the consent calendar and then adopted item 089, which involved Department of Safety/Homeland Security grant funding for active shooter incident management and school reunification training. Officials said the project is a mandatory Homeland Security grant set-aside, with training for public safety officials and school districts and internal social media used only to promote training schedules; members asked about marketing, outcomes, and how success would be measured. The committee next considered item 097 for the Division of Historical Resources. Agency officials said the request was driven by a decade-long increase in Section 106 and state historic preservation reviews, many tied to disaster-related infrastructure work such as culvert and road repairs, and that the grant would add capacity to handle roughly 1,000 to 1,500 reviews per year. The committee approved the item after brief discussion. Under the regular calendar, the Department of Transportation presented a fuel-related transfer. Members questioned the decline in the highway fund balance, which staff said was being affected by rising expenses, flat-to-moderate revenue, and a rough winter that increased maintenance costs. DOT officials said they were considering toll rate increases and noted the agency pays market wholesale fuel rates; they also discussed prior fuel hedging decisions and said they have authority to hedge again if it makes sense. The committee approved the DOT item, then approved a miscellaneous action item to fill a position at the LBA. Members also asked the chair to remind the Attorney General to appear at a future meeting regarding the YDC claims report. The committee set its next meeting for Friday, June 19 at 11:00 a.m., and adjourned after a brief note of appreciation for recent corrections and changes reported by the liquor commission.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have a citation and fine program, and that's for more fixable types of violations.
• So the Student Tuition Recovery Fund does work like an insurance program.
• He's gutted, I think, every grant program and policy that I worked on when I was there.
• At the Oakland campus, there's 1,200 students in undergrad and graduate programs.
• In programs that may not lead to intended employment outcomes.

Summary: The joint Sunset Review Oversight Hearing focused on the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE) and its reauthorization, operations, enforcement, fiscal condition, and student protections. Committee leaders and DCA officials praised the Bureau’s recent improvements in data systems, licensing, inspections, and enforcement, while noting the Bureau’s role has become more important as federal higher education oversight weakens. Bureau Chief Deborah Cochran said the agency has met its inspection mandate for the first time since the law was enacted, increased citations and disciplinary actions, reduced pending complaints, and used data tools to identify risk and monitor institutions more effectively. A major portion of the hearing centered on student harm, especially school closures, transcript access, predatory recruiting, and the Student Tuition Recovery Fund (STRF). Members asked how the Bureau protects students when schools close, whether bad actors can reopen under new entities, and whether enforcement tools are strong enough. Cochran said the Bureau can cite, fine, place schools on probation, revoke licenses, and order refunds, but it is seeking new authority to deny approval to operators who previously closed schools improperly or failed to refund students. She also said the Bureau is tracking ownership data and is concerned about institutions targeting immigrant and visa students. On STRF, Cochran explained that the fund is currently healthy, assessments are at zero because the balance is above the statutory target, and the Bureau paid about 1,100 claims totaling roughly $17 million over the last four years. Several members questioned the fairness of the assessment structure and discussed alternatives such as surety bonds, but the Bureau said STRF is working well and no change is needed at this time. Fee increases and the Bureau’s structural deficit were another major topic. Cochran said the Bureau reduced costs by eliminating positions, streamlining inspections, improving data analysis, and shifting some student-relief costs to STRF, but that legislative action is still needed to address the deficit. She said the proposed fees were based on workload analyses and that application fees generally match service costs, while annual fees are designed to cover most of the Bureau’s revenue needs. Some members and stakeholders criticized the proposed increases as too high, especially for out-of-state registration and campus fees, while others argued the Bureau needs sufficient resources to regulate effectively. Public commenters from private schools, Northeastern University, San Joaquin Valley College/Carrington College, and TICAS generally supported the Bureau’s mission and reauthorization, but urged changes such as risk-based oversight, better transcript protections, stronger limits on repeated provisional approvals, and more targeted fee and STRF reforms. No votes were taken, and the hearing ended with no formal action beyond discussion and receipt of testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• about 20 involved with our program now. about 20 involved with our program now.
• , if we could infrastructure grants, if we could target<00:10:10.160> grants<00:10:10.800>
• > um, target grants and work with grants, um, target grants and work with grants, um, not<00:10
• <00:10:17.920> that employer aligned training programs that employer aligned training programs
• I'm the interim program director of the marriage and family therapy program at Campbellville University

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first heard a presentation from Northern Kentucky building industry representatives Brian Miller and Matt Mains on housing affordability and construction workforce issues. They argued that regulatory and code requirements add significant cost to new homes, citing an estimate of nearly $94,000 per home nationally and $15,000 to $20,000 per home in Boone County over the past decade. They recommended reforms to building code adoption, architectural design mandates, permit fees and delays, and setback/land dedication rules, saying these changes could reduce costs by $25,000 to $35,000 per home without affecting public safety. They also discussed workforce training efforts through the Enzwe Building Institute, dual-credit programs, apprenticeship incentives, and workforce grants, saying these efforts have helped hold wage growth below regional trends and improve housing affordability. Committee members asked about the breakdown of regulatory costs, the effect of energy codes, and ways to speed up permitting. The presenters said the costs were roughly split among federal, state, and local requirements, with local regulations adding about $25,000 to $35,000 and some energy-code changes adding about $19,000 per home. They said faster plan review, coordination with the Kentucky Division of Water, and addressing municipal staffing shortages could cut 30 to 45 days from approvals. Members also discussed the difficulty of building starter homes under about $350,000 and the need for more missing-middle housing, with the presenters saying such homes are hard to produce without sacrificing quality. The committee then took up Representative Kim Moer and Dr. Dale Bertram’s discussion of marriage and family therapist licensing and healthcare workforce data reporting. They explained that the bill would allow Kentucky to recognize out-of-state marriage and family therapists who meet licensure requirements, have no disciplinary history, and have passed the national exam, in order to reduce barriers and address provider shortages, especially in rural areas. They also described a separate workforce data reporting section that would require licensure boards to collect consistent information on where licensees practice and whether they are actively seeing patients, including through telehealth, so the state can better understand its healthcare workforce. Members supported the portability idea, noted that some qualified applicants are currently working in Indiana instead of Kentucky, and asked whether the data collection could be handled administratively; the sponsors said the bill would create consistency across boards. The committee also briefly discussed occupational board updates and the need for stronger communication between legislators and licensing boards, including architecture licensure issues and efforts to recruit more professionals.

Transcript Highlights:

• programs.
• program.
• The last area is seaport connectivity program that program has been around for a while.
• SWIFT program is oversubscribed.
• We used two programs. One, the Water Loan Assistance Program.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So maybe the legislature, whenever this comes to fruition, could set up grant programs for hospitals,
• You could also do grant programs or something along that line as well.
• So how will this impact rural physician recruitment programs?
• So how will this impact rural physician recruitment programs?
• T-SET told the legislature they can apply for a grant like everybody else.

Bills: HB3327, HB3711, HB4104, HJR1077, HB3329

Keywords: State Board of Education, Oklahoma education board, board appointments, school governance, education reform, governor appointments, legislative appointments, speaker of the house, president pro tempore, senate confirmation, board vacancies, removal for cause, public education, state superintendent, school board training, board member qualifications, emergency clause, Oklahoma statutes 70 O.S. 3-101, school funding, transparency

Summary: The committee first considered House Bill 3711, which was described as a work in progress aimed at increasing transparency for taxpayers about instructional expenditures in school bond communications. Members questioned whether the bill changed what districts may bond for, and the author said it did not alter the bond process, only added communications. After title was struck, the bill passed committee 13-5. House Bill 4104, dealing with repeat peeping Tom and clandestine recording offenses, was presented with an amendment adding conduct involving three or more separate victims as a basis for felony treatment. The amendment was adopted after questions about its legal basis and a recent court decision. The bill as amended then passed committee unanimously, 18-0. The committee also took up House Joint Resolution 1077, which would send to voters a proposal to move $1 billion from the Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust corpus into a new Oklahoma’s Futures Trust Fund. The proponent said the T-SET board would remain in place, the corpus would stay protected, and annual earnings from the new fund would be split between reinvestment and legislative appropriations for health and education. Opponents argued the measure would shift money from an independent endowment to a politically controlled process and could weaken existing T-SET programs. After debate, the resolution passed committee 14-4. Finally, House Bill 3327 proposed expanding the State Board of Education from seven to nine members, with appointments divided among the governor, speaker, and president pro tem, and allowing removal only for cause. Members raised questions about geographic representation and vacancy appointments, but the bill passed as amended 15-2. House Bill 3329, a trailer bill related to sunset legislation, added a July 1, 2027 sunset for the Board of Psychological Examiners after concerns about its handling of a complaint and a recent court ruling; it passed as amended 14-2, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• He wanted to cut the Staff Sergeant Parker Gordon Fox suicide prevention grant program.
• He wanted to cut VA homeless provider grants, VA supportive services for veteran families programs, legal
• services for veterans grant programs, state veterans home care payments to states for programs to promote
• the hiring and retention of nurses at state veterans' homes, and veterans' cemetery grant programs.
• These are not new programs and they deserve our support.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The program is succeeding to grow as well going forward.
• If we don't, it shouldn't be a state program that's paying for this.
• And so the program fundamentally is an incentive program, as we've all talked about.
• And then the modalities part of it is, you know, looking at the programs.
• The federal programs at stake exist for students like us.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:13:18.639> more constitution would probably grant more constitution would probably grant
• > me<00:40:46.960> that Kristen Grant shared with me that Kristen Grant shared with me
• My units do of Program Integrity.
• support program. Again, Lisa Decatowski. support program. Again, Lisa Decatowski.
• The child support support program.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• our regular grant and aid process,<00:13:08.399> which<00:13:08.720> uh,<00:13:08.880>
• Residents who rely on programs like SNAP and WIC underwent uncertainty and quite a bit of stress.
• The legislature passed Act 310 so that we could provide a safety net to preserve and continue programs
• The legislature passed Act 310 so that we could provide a safety net to preserve and continue programs
• Honolulu Community Action Program, 350,000. Honolulu Theater for Youth, 300,000.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The hearing was an informational briefing on Act 310, which set aside $50 million to support Hawaii nonprofits facing uncertainty, including organizations affected by federal funding disruptions. The chair and Senate co-chair thanked Aloha United Way for handling applications, as well as the governor, lieutenant governor, legislative leadership, and House and Senate members for helping craft the measure and review the needs statewide. They noted the process drew more than 200 applications totaling over $150 million, showing demand far exceeded available funds, and encouraged unsuccessful applicants to apply again through the regular grant-and-aid process in January. The Senate co-chair explained that the committee prioritized organizations serving healthcare, human services, education, the arts, food distribution, and at-risk populations, especially amid concerns about SNAP, WIC, federal employees, and possible future disruptions. The co-chair then read a long list of recommended awardees and funding amounts, including major allocations to groups such as Boys and Girls Club of the Big Island, Child and Family Service, Goodwill Industries of Hawaii, Hawaii Food Bank, The Food Basket, West Hawaii Community Health Center, and several YWCA and YMCA organizations, among many others. After the awards list was read, the chair asked for discussion or objections. Hearing none, the list of nonprofit awards was adopted, and the informational briefing was adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• support outreach program. support outreach program.
• grant and state expansion funding. grant and state expansion funding.
• It's a great program.
• It's a great program. program. program.
• and the phasein program. and the phasein program.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:02:21.440> and agency is in charge of this program and agency is in charge of this program
• note that the legislature hasn't granted note that the legislature hasn't granted any<00:16:46.399
• projects how this program has impacted projects how this program has impacted projects subject<00
• local government agency on a grant local government agency on a grant basis<00:23:49.000> um<
• about 20 22 years ago when the program about 20 22 years ago when the program first<00:50:50.680

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The House Capital Investment Committee met on January 23 and approved the minutes from the previous meeting. The main presentation was from the Office of the Legislative Auditor on its evaluation of Minnesota’s Sustainable Building guidelines, also referred to as B3. The auditors said the guidelines apply to certain new buildings and major renovations funded with general obligation bonds and are intended to improve energy efficiency, occupant health, and environmental quality. They described the program as involving the Departments of Administration and Commerce, the University of Minnesota’s Center for Sustainable Building Research, and project teams, but found widespread confusion over who is responsible for administering and enforcing the program. The auditors reported that oversight and accountability are limited, compliance is not clearly tracked, and there is no agency assigned to ensure projects follow the guidelines or to require compliance data. They said many projects in a review of 2020 bonding projects had not begun tracking compliance, and that up-to-date data were often missing. They also found the law’s stated program objectives are outdated because the referenced energy-code provision was repealed in 2009, and that measurable goals have not been established for most of the guideline categories. The office recommended that the legislature designate a responsible agency, clarify duties in statute, require compliance monitoring and data collection, update the program’s stated goals, and direct systematic evaluation of cost and sustainability outcomes. Members asked about consequences for noncompliance, funding, and whether cost impacts should be studied first. The auditor said the requirements are legal obligations, but no real enforcement consequences have been used so far, and any consequences discussed have been mostly theoretical. She said the Departments of Administration and Commerce were receiving about $1 million combined to support the contract with the Center for Sustainable Building Research, while other state agencies were not receiving dedicated funding for oversight. In response to questions about costs, she said the overall effect of the guidelines on project costs and sustainability is still unknown, but that the legislature could direct an analysis of cost impacts before taking further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• all H in the chamber Mission granted all H in the chamber Mission granted all right we have two special
• that semiquincentennial school program that semiquincentennial school program that we're initiating
• opportunities allocating funds a grant opportunities allocating funds a grant opportunities for your
• for absent leaves of absence be granted for absent leaves of absence be granted for absent members any
• or not granted that's correct granted or not granted that's correct granted or not granted that's correct

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesota Mano created a special program Minnesota Mano created a special program just<00:04:15.519
• of another program in our school of another program in our school districts<00:10:58.240> yeah
• Would you match our federal grant?
• Would you match our federal grant?
• Would you match our federal grant?

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so financial literacy programs that I've looked at, it's all Western-based. Yeah.
• So do you think Hawaiʻi is getting all the grant money...
• I think take a deeper dive into the research of grants.
• I also research grants. for economic development projects that are available? No.
• I also research grants.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Committee on Economic Development and Tourism heard several governor’s nominations for advisory and regulatory boards. The first group included William Smith, Michelle Ige, and Kayana Neman for the Community-Based Economic Development Advisory Council; Leland Park and Cynthia Hobson for the Small Business Regulatory Review Board; and Nicole Kacal for the Hawaiʻi Technology Development Corporation board. DBEDT and related witnesses testified in support of all nominees, and each nominee described experience in small business, finance, community engagement, or technology. Much of the discussion focused on strengthening Hawaiʻi’s economy through small business support, financial literacy, and better access to capital and grants. Committee members questioned nominees about priorities for Hawaiʻi Island and the state more broadly. Topics included agricultural infrastructure, value-added food production, shared processing facilities and commercial kitchens, workforce housing, and ways government and nonprofits can partner to help small businesses navigate permitting, licensing, and grant processes. Several nominees emphasized community impact, measurable outcomes, and practical regulatory reform. Nicole Kacal also discussed diversifying the economy beyond tourism, expanding technology and AI opportunities, and creating locally governed training and research pathways so workers can adapt to changing jobs. At the end of the hearing, the committee voted to recommend advice and consent for all nominees. The nominations for GM 608, GM 609, GM 612, and GM 613 were adopted by voice vote, with Senators Kim and Fevella excused. The committee then voted separately on GM 794 for Nicole Kacal, and that recommendation was also adopted. The hearing concluded with adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our pilot programs are two main programs: assisted outpatient treatment.
• Our other program is our Competency Diversion Program. This arises in the criminal context.
• The program was established by a grant in 2019.
• funding to support the program.
• outpatient treatment program.

Transcript Highlights:

• <02:33:39.840> Would<02:33:40.000> ask a result of the grant program.
• Would ask a result of the grant program.
• Amendment L10 clarifies grant program money as fee revenue.
• We specifically in with a grant program.
• get creates a grant program to try to get creates a grant program to try to get hardened<02:41:24.560

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I do have a question out to Grant Wallace to try to get that confirmed, whether or not that coverage
• Of course, we received the BOLD grants in 2022.
• program.
• They've done a great job administering this grant program.
• We administer the grant because most of these people need help.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And there's a lot of programs, right? And I'm not the program guy.
• Two different programs? Okay.
• And I’ll go back to the parent-the-teacher program, which isn’t a perfect program.
• It certainly has its strengths and weaknesses. ...teacher program, which isn’t a perfect program.
• program costs, program this, they request that.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But when asked who would run such a national program, he suggests it would be the states.
• Act and Section 504 and overseeing Title I funds and Pell grants for over 6 million American students
• Transferring these programs over to other federal and state departments would weaken their strength and
• There will be no federal assistance for institutions to implement federally mandated programs, putting
• for CTE programs that prepare our students for college and career.

Transcript Highlights:

• .<00:55:07.119> CASA<00:55:07.599> programs<00:55:07.920> cultivate programs.
• CASA programs cultivate programs.
• But let's be and history programs.
• programs to address these very issues. programs to address these very issues.
• programs if market conditions change. programs if market conditions change.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, 1012, house, all