Transcript Highlights:

• </c> restricted use restricted use um restricted use restricted use um pesticide<00:04:19.239><c> license
• </c> comes to use of restricted pesticides? comes to use of restricted pesticides?
• </c> um we actually didn't use any restricted um we actually didn't use any restricted use<00:04:54.240
• <00:05:26.520><c> use</c> restricted use restricted use pesticides<00:05:28.440><c> for</c><00:05:28.560
• From what I know of it, is it only restricted use pesticides or all pesticides?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard gubernatorial nominations for the Advisory Committee on Pesticides and the Board of Agriculture and Biosecurity. For GM 615, Matthew Liam was nominated to the Advisory Committee on Pesticides. The Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, CGAPS, and the Hawaii Farm Bureau testified in strong support, citing his landscape industry leadership, pesticide training background, and prior service. Members asked about his experience in Australia and his approach to restricted-use pesticides; he said he avoided using restricted-use pesticides in his landscaping business but applied related safety and recordkeeping practices. Testimony was unanimous in support, with no opposition or comments. For GM 616, N. Young was nominated to the Board of Agriculture and Biosecurity. Support testimony from the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Hawaii Cattlemen's Council highlighted his experience with Lanai agriculture, Sensei, the Food Basket, Pacific Gateway Center, Kamehameha Schools, and institutional purchasing. In response to questions, he discussed balancing public and private funding, the need for adequate capitalization of agricultural projects, and using financial tools to help farmers and accelerate agricultural income streams. He also said the board should focus on making agricultural land productive and strengthening food security. The nomination drew strong support, with no opposition or comments. For GM 617, Jason Moniz was nominated to the Board of Agriculture and Biosecurity. The Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Hawaii Cattlemen's Council supported him, emphasizing his decades of veterinary and animal disease control experience, ranching background, and knowledge of biosecurity, leases, and livestock issues. Moniz said his priorities would be preserving agricultural land and water resources, improving biosecurity, supporting farmers and ranchers, and increasing food production in Hawaii. He also said he would be willing to speak up for agriculture and not let the department be sidelined. The nomination received 29 written and oral supports, with no opposition or comments.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, they all fall within the umbrella of restrictive covenants, restrictive agreements.
• They can have similar restrictions, just a different structure.
• They can have similar restrictions, just a different structure.
• I've practiced in restrictive covenants for 20 plus years.
• They are more restrictive than Florida.

Summary: The Committee on Commerce and Tourism took up several measures, beginning with SB 1666, which would adopt Florida’s version of UCC Article 12 to address commercial transactions involving digital assets such as cryptocurrency, smart contracts, blockchain, and NFTs. The committee adopted a technical amendment and then reported the bill favorably. It also approved CS/SB 480, a proposal to create affordable health coverage options for farmers and ranchers through a nonprofit agricultural organization model; the bill drew significant questions about preexisting conditions, ACA coverage, costs, and whether the plans would function like insurance, but it was ultimately reported favorably despite opposition from some members and outside groups. The committee then unanimously advanced CS/SB 1172, which expands business development incentives for veterans and military spouses, including procurement preferences, fee waivers, tax exemptions, and an entrepreneurship program; an amendment added military-spouse hiring preferences and protections for private employers that adopt them voluntarily. The committee also approved CS/SB 1400, a bill aimed at non-consensual AI-generated sexual deepfakes. The measure requires covered platforms to provide a removal process, post clear notice of that process, and remove identified content within 24 to 48 hours, with liability under the Florida Unfair Trade and Deceptive Practices Act for noncompliance; an amendment carved out internet service providers from liability. Members raised concerns about repeat uploads and the meaning of “reasonable efforts,” but the bill was reported favorably. The committee then adopted SM 1488, a memorial urging Congress to create a sovereign wealth fund, despite testimony opposing it as unnecessary and constitutionally questionable. It also passed SB 1252, which would create a centralized statewide system for sharing pawn and secondhand dealer data among law enforcement agencies; the sponsor said the first step would be a $250,000 feasibility study, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee considered SB 922, which revises Florida’s restrictive covenant laws by creating a streamlined process for certain non-compete and garden leave agreements involving employees with access to sensitive information and higher wages. The bill drew extensive debate over worker mobility, global scope, and whether it would strengthen employer leverage too much; after a technical amendment, it was reported favorably. The last major item was SB 1776, a Florida Whistleblowers Act revision that adds a notice-to-cure requirement, narrows retaliation and employer definitions, and limits claims where another statutory remedy exists. Members and public speakers raised concerns that it could make whistleblower claims harder to bring and give employers time to destroy evidence, but the bill was amended and then reported favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• covenants restrict agreements.
• They can have similar restrictions. Just a different structure. Okay.
• I don't believe that. >> I practiced in restrictive covenants for 20 plus years.
• Florida has the most balanced restrictive covenant law in the country.
• I don't see a current trend dialing back restrictive covenants.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c> in</c><00:12:25.040><c> the</c> Use of restricted funds in the Use of restricted funds in the Department
• ><c> funds</c> Page 61, interim restricted funds Page 61, interim restricted funds appropriation<00:43
• no change in restricted funds.
• </c> million in restricted funds. million in restricted funds.
• </c><01:12:42.840><c> funds</c> identifies the excess restricted funds identifies the excess restricted

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Free Conference Committee on the 2026 General Assembly budget met to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of House Bill 500. Leaders opened by thanking the other chamber’s work, asking members to turn microphones on and off to avoid feedback, and stressing the need to clearly note decision points so both chambers record the same actions. Staff then walked through the bill page by page, explaining that the committee was comparing only House and Senate differences, not the governor’s proposed budget. The discussion covered a wide range of appropriations and language items, including next generation non-911 services, school safety reporting tools, restored funding for brain injury, epilepsy, veteran service, homeless veterans, and rocket docket programs, debt service changes, rural infrastructure, disaster aid caps, Attorney General and Medicaid fraud funding, agriculture and county fair grants, auditor and pension-related appropriations, school facilities and SEEK funding, and numerous education programs. Members also discussed charter-related funding such as Star Academy, Dolly Parton Imagination Library, school resource officers, school-based mental health providers, AP/IB exams, Governor’s Scholars and Entrepreneurs, and several pilot or initiative programs in economic development, energy, and labor. Several items were described as technical corrections or restorations of language and funding, while others reflected differences in amounts or how funds would be distributed. There were several questions and comments from members about wording such as “implement and carry out,” the absence of the governor’s budget from the comparison document, and whether SEEK funding should be tied to teacher raises. The chair and other members emphasized that the committee’s role was to reconcile the two chambers’ budgets, not to adopt the governor’s proposal. Members also raised concerns about opioid settlement funds and the Dolly Parton Imagination Library match rate, with one senator urging restoration of the House language. No final vote or formal action was taken in the portion provided; the meeting primarily consisted of explanation, questions, and discussion of proposed budget differences.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> getting into that so that's restricted getting into that so that's restricted so<00:10:15.519><c
• </c> process there is a 15year restriction process there is a 15year restriction period<00:13:38.440>
• </c><01:16:52.760><c> an</c> purchase voluntary deed restrictions an purchase voluntary deed restrictions
• </c> purchase voluntary deed restrictions purchase voluntary deed restrictions from<01:17:37.159><c>
• </c> definition of discriminatory restrictive definition of discriminatory restrictive covenant<01:27

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 834, which would change restrictions on transfers of real property under chapter 201H, HRS, and was discussed in the context of Hawaiian homelands and HHFDC-funded projects. Supporters, including HHFDC, DHHL, and individual testifiers, said the bill would clarify that Hawaiian homelands should not be subject to the 201H buyback and appreciation restrictions, while preserving affordability requirements tied to federal mortgage and tax credit programs. HHFDC explained that the main concern was the buyback/share-appreciation provisions, especially for DHHL projects using LIHTC or similar financing, and said aligning the statute with DHHL’s program goals would not be a problem. Members questioned whether removing the restrictions could weaken affordability protections, and whether the state could still prioritize beneficiaries and workforce housing, but no vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee then took up SB 759, which would add the DHHL chairperson or designee to the HHFDC board of directors and adjust quorum requirements. DHHL and several supporters argued the measure would give Hawaiian Homes a seat at the table, improve access to HHFDC funding sources such as tax credits, private activity bonds, and revolving funds, and help leverage limited resources to reduce the Hawaiian Homes waitlist. One testifier supported the bill but urged safeguards to prevent favoritism or abuse of power, and another raised concerns about whether a DHHL representative would need to recuse from voting on projects involving DHHL. HHFDC testified that DHHL projects still must compete under the same criteria and set-asides as other applicants, and that the board already includes multiple public and executive representatives. Members pressed on whether DHHL could achieve the same informational goals without a voting seat, and whether the added board role would create leverage or conflicts. The DHHL witness said a nonvoting role could provide information, but a voting seat would be more useful for decision-making and advocacy. The discussion also covered DHHL’s use of LIHTC, rent-to-own models, transitional housing, and other layered financing, as well as the broader need to coordinate state housing resources. The transcript ends during continued questioning, with no final committee action or vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• These restrictions can be grouped into the following categories.
• These restrictions can be grouped into the following categories.
• There's two prongs that apply to our restriction of any kind of activity.
• Is there a way to decipher what the impact is for each one of those bans or restrictions?
• We then compare that to an all-country benchmark that has no such restrictions.

Summary: The Government Operations Subcommittee met with a quorum and began with member introductions and remarks from the chair emphasizing the committee’s focus on government efficiency, accountability, and oversight of executive branch agencies. Members shared their districts and backgrounds, with several noting hurricane recovery in their communities and a shared interest in reducing bureaucracy and improving service to Floridians. The committee’s only presentation was from Chris Spencer, Executive Director of the State Board of Administration, who gave an overview of the SBA’s governance structure, investment responsibilities, and divestment policies. He explained the SBA’s management of more than $257 billion in assets, including the Florida Retirement System, the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, and Florida PRIME, and reviewed the Protecting Florida’s Investments Act restrictions covering Northern Ireland, Cuba, Venezuela, Israel, Sudan, Iran, and China. He also described the implementation of HB 7071, including the required divestment from direct holdings in Chinese companies, and said the SBA had reduced its direct Chinese holdings from 33 companies totaling over $172 million to 13 companies totaling about $64 million, with completion expected ahead of the September 1, 2025 deadline. Members asked detailed questions about the Israel boycott list, Morningstar and MSCI, how the SBA gathers information, whether Cuba’s federal designation changes affect Florida law, how companies are removed from scrutinized lists, and whether divestment timing could affect returns. Spencer said the SBA uses public and paid research sources, gives companies a 90-day cure period in some cases, and brings list changes to the trustees for approval. He also explained that the China benchmark change is intended to reduce passive exposure while still allowing active investment decisions, and said the PFIA restrictions have had a modestly positive overall effect on pension performance. The chair also asked about the Florida Retirement System funded ratio and the CAT Fund’s capacity; Spencer said the pension fund is at 80.7% funded, that actuarial assumptions are reviewed regularly, and that the CAT Fund currently has more than $10.5 billion in liquid claims-paying capacity and is expected to remain well positioned for hurricane losses. No votes were taken, and the meeting adjourned after the presentation and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• , and so this bill... ...to that compromise, that restriction.
• You, the restricted person, the court has ordered them that this is your...
• Getting more of this information, more clarity on who's driving restricted.
• Their license would say that they have a restriction on it.
• recognize what they're restricted from.

Bills: HB2051, HB2114, HB2127, HB2134, HB2207, HB2574, HB2700, HB2800, HB2916

Keywords: AHCCCS, lactation care, breastfeeding, health services, healthcare access, motorcycle registration, safety fund, education, awareness programs, low-income scholarships, motorcycle training, special license plates, transportation, funding, nonprofits, charitable contributions, critical infrastructure, foreign adversaries, China, communications

Transcript Highlights:

• attorney, and the person subject to the restriction within 48 hours of imposing the restriction.
• This notice must include a description of the restriction and any limited restrictions attempted.
• </c> 48 hours of imposing the restriction. 48 hours of imposing the restriction.
• and any limited of the restriction and any limited restrictions<00:32:23.880><c> attempted.
• Section 15 restrictions attempted.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Restricted use is a online.
• </c> our neighbors have restrictions? our neighbors have restrictions?
• sale</c><00:40:48.560><c> to</c> uh restrict the restrict the sale to uh restrict the restrict the sale
• Um, just listening to the discussion about restricted use and non-restricted use.
• >> Restrictions.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In the Auditor of Public Accounts, we replace general funds with restricted to support the Ombudsman.
• In the Personnel Board, we increase restricted funds to increase hearing officer hourly rates.
• </c><00:29:30.679><c> to</c> replace general funds with restricted to replace general funds with restricted
• </c> restricted funds for artificial restricted funds for artificial intelligence<00:29:35.960><c> initiative
• </c> justice training, we transfer restricted justice training, we transfer restricted funds<00:39:58.920

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Revenue so the restricted Lottery Revenue so the restricted Lottery<00:45:45.839><c> revenues</c><00
• </c><00:48:34.200><c> it</c> are doing is that we're restricting it are doing is that we're restricting
• ><c> Lottery</c> need to see that the restricted Lottery need to see that the restricted Lottery revenue
• </c><01:01:54.240><c> unrestricted</c> categorization restricted unrestricted categorization restricted
• </c> accounts go so this will be restricted accounts go so this will be restricted Revenue<01:21:35.920

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard Representative Sweeney present and defend the budget amendment legalizing video lottery terminals (VLTs) and setting a 30% tax rate, with 65% of the tax going to the state and 35% to charities. He argued the lower rate was needed to encourage operators of historic horse racing (HHR) machines to convert to VLTs, saying the higher 45% rate would discourage adoption. He walked through revenue projections for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, estimating significant increases in state and charity revenue as machines transition over time, and said the amendment was designed to expand charitable gaming revenue overall. Several members questioned the assumptions behind his projections and the basis for his analysis, including why his independent research differed from the governor’s and Lottery Commission’s estimates. Sweeney said his figures were based on research into other states and conversations over many years, and he maintained that a 45% tax would likely result in no VLT adoption. Members also debated whether the transition costs for operators would be quickly recouped and whether the state’s share should be larger. One member emphasized that the committee was effectively choosing between a lower operator share and a higher state share, while Sweeney argued the 30% structure would produce revenue for everyone. The committee then moved to other revenue items on the tracking sheet. It voted 7-0 to accept the Lottery Commission’s revised base revenue estimates. Members also discussed an amendment to repeal the local option requirement for Kino games, which would expand Kino availability and was estimated to generate additional lottery profit in fiscal years 2026 and 2027. That amendment drew opposition from members who said local control was an important part of the original Kino policy and that removing it would override municipal decisions. The committee also noted that the VLT/HHR revenue item had already been adopted and was being revisited only to confirm the associated revenue estimates.

Transcript Highlights:

• Non-discretionary overrides are synonymous with the word restriction.
• Those individuals are restricted for minimum security.
• Other questions related to restrictions?
• Do they have similar guidance for restrictions? They do not.
• We used to restrict individuals who were sentenced to murder in the second, restricted them for a year

Keywords: 1212, all

Summary: The Special Commission on Correctional Consolidation and Collaboration met with DOC leadership and UMass Chan researchers to discuss Massachusetts DOC’s objective point-based classification system, with a focus on whether inmates are overclassified and how discretionary and non-discretionary overrides affect placement decisions. DOC explained the system’s history, its goals of public safety and reintegration, the initial and reclassification tools, and the use of overrides and restrictions. Staff described several non-discretionary restrictions for minimum and medium security, the limited use of discretionary overrides, and current population breakdowns showing most classified in medium security, with smaller shares in maximum and lower security. UMass Chan presented preliminary findings from a NIJ-funded study using historical DOC data from 2019 to 2022, primarily on male reclassification cases. They said the scored custody level predicted institutional misconduct well, with stronger separation among minimum, medium, and maximum groups. They also said predictive accuracy declined after applying override-informed custody levels, and that the decline appeared to be driven mainly by non-discretionary restrictions rather than discretionary overrides. The researchers noted that violent misconduct in the sample was relatively rare and that the study was based on group-level statistics, not individual cases. Commission members and guests raised concerns about whether the data captured the effects of facility conditions, historical bias, step-down and step-up decisions, and the role of civil commitment restrictions, especially Code C. DOC and UMass Chan responded that the study did not show evidence that discretionary overrides reduced accuracy, that the non-discretionary restrictions were the main factor affecting results, and that Massachusetts’ system should not be directly compared with other states because of differences in facility structure and population. The commission asked members to send follow-up data questions to staff for transmission to DOC and the researchers.

Transcript Highlights:

• ,</c><00:08:28.240><c> not</c><00:08:28.400><c> the</c><00:08:28.639><c> restrictive</c> the restrictive
• , not the restrictive the restrictive, not the restrictive procedures,<00:08:29.520><c> but</c><00:08
• </c> the restrictive procedure pieces of it. the restrictive procedure pieces of it.
• </c> restrictive restraints and seclusion. restrictive restraints and seclusion.
• </c> restrictive procedures. restrictive procedures.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:52:37.359><c> restricted</c><00:52:38.000><c> only</c><00:52:38.319><c> to</c> that is is restrict
• restricted only to that is is restrict restricted only to the<00:52:39.359><c> identification</c><00
• </c> state interest and no less restrictive state interest and no less restrictive alternative.<01:04
• There are other less restrictive alternatives.
• So are less restrictive alternatives.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It allows me to restrict my appraisal district information.
• That are under that restriction.
• What restrictions or regulations do they put in place?
• That's led to where registrants are restricted to where That's led to where registrants are restricted
• Residency restrictions, the bottom line is that all research shows that registry restrictions do not

Bills: HB240, HB2097, HB2731, HB3087, HB3234, HB3319, HB3394, HB3687, HB4105, HB4205, HB4350, HB4462, HB4642, HB4801, HB5403

Keywords: quorum, tax levy, county governance, local government, population regulations, quorum requirement, Texas counties, population threshold, deputy sheriff, civil service, law enforcement, appeals process, sheriff's department, HB 2731, roadside vendors, solicitors, county regulation, border counties, Mexico border, Transportation Code

Summary: The subcommittee on county and regional government heard a long agenda of county-related bills, with most measures left pending after testimony. HB 2097, by Rep. Martinez, would let counties that opt in use an independent hearing examiner instead of a civil service commission for certain deputy sheriff discipline appeals; the bill drew support from CLEET’s Robert Leonard, who said it would be fairer and faster, and it was left pending. HB 4642, by Rep. Gonzalez, would require counties that contract with out-of-state jail facilities to include Texas jail-standard protections and oversight; Gonzalez, detainee Jess Hampton, his wife, Texas Jail Project’s Krish Kundu, and TCJS director Brandon Wood all discussed deaths and poor conditions in Louisiana facilities, staffing shortages, and the need for guardrails and data collection. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4350, by Rep. Capriglione, allowing peace officers to request redaction of personal information from online real property records. Supporters said officers face targeted threats and should have protections similar to judges; a title industry witness warned about preserving the integrity of land records. The bill was left pending. HB 3687, by Rep. Harless, would require county fire marshals in counties over 100,000 to meet training and certification standards within set timeframes; Harris County Fire Marshal Laurie Christensen supported professionalization, and the bill was left pending. HB 4105 would let very large counties give a local-bid preference for construction and infrastructure contracts, and HB 4205 would require pay parity for similar law enforcement ranks within large counties; both were supported by Harris County officials and constables and left pending. Later, the committee heard HB 5403, which would repeal a special rule limiting Dallas and Tarrant county sheriffs’ control over commissary funds; the author said it would remove an outdated population bracket, and the bill was left pending. HB 4462 would require large counties to allow elected officials named in civil suits to seek outside counsel and have a role in settlement decisions; supporters argued county attorneys and commissioners court can have conflicts of interest, while questions focused on who qualifies and whether the bill could complicate settlements. The bill was left pending. Finally, HB 240, by Rep. Swanson, would restore a five-member quorum requirement for Harris County tax levies, effectively preventing tax action without all commissioners present and defaulting to the no-new-revenue rate if quorum is not met; urban counties opposed it as a potential budget obstruction, while supporters said it protects taxpayers and representation. That bill was also left pending. The transcript ends as the committee begins HB 3319, which would create a civil service system for constable department employees in large counties, but the discussion is cut off before testimony or action.

Transcript Highlights:

• HRSA was trying to limit these types of restrictions.
• These restrictions do not benefit patients; they simply increase manufacturer profits.
• What's harming patients are the restrictions...
• Manufacturer restrictions do not benefit patients; they simply increase pharmaceutical profits.
• Manufacturer restrictions do not benefit patients; they simply increase pharmaceutical profits.

Bills: HB2145, HB1828, HB2155, HB2437

Keywords: 340B drug pricing, healthcare access, patient rights, discounted medications, manufacturer limitations, health professions, plasma donation, physician substitutes, medical regulation, nursing titles, healthcare, regulation, professional standards, licensure, accreditation, opioid treatment, health services, fee authority, public health, 904

Summary: The committee heard staff reports, sponsor testimony, and public testimony on House Bill 2437, which would place the Department of Health’s existing opioid treatment program accreditation role into statute and authorize the department to set fees to cover the cost of administering accreditation. Supporters, including the prime sponsor and DOH, said the bill would preserve a critical service for opioid treatment programs, including many tribal providers, and help avoid reliance on third-party accreditors with more burdensome requirements. No vote was taken on the bill during the portion provided. The committee then held an extended work session on the 340B drug pricing program and later opened public testimony on House Bill 2145, which would prohibit manufacturers, distributors, and third-party logistics providers from restricting 340B drug acquisition or delivery and from conditioning access on claims or utilization data. Staff and outside presenters explained how 340B works, recent litigation over contract pharmacy restrictions, and state trends in 340B-related legislation. Testimony was sharply divided: hospitals, community health centers, tribal representatives, labor groups, and some pharmacies argued the bill protects safety-net care, rural access, and patient services funded by 340B savings; manufacturers, employer groups, and business associations argued the program has grown far beyond its original purpose, lacks transparency, increases costs for employers and taxpayers, and should be reformed federally instead. No action was taken on HB 2145 in the excerpt. Finally, the committee began House Bill 2155, which would bar non-human entities from using nursing titles such as nurse, RN, LPN, or advanced registered nurse practitioner. The prime sponsor and the Washington State Nurses Association said the bill is intended to protect patient safety, transparency, and the integrity of the nursing profession as AI tools become more common in health care. A committee member asked about enforcement and liability if an AI system misrepresented itself as a nurse, and staff said they would follow up with more information. Public testimony on HB 2155 had just begun when the excerpt ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• They just talked about the restriction, yeah, and the restriction is 10%, right?
• They just talked about the restriction, yeah, and the restriction is 10%, right?
• yeah and the and the Restriction yeah and the and the Restriction<00:26:56.240><c> is</c><00:26:56.440
• </c><00:27:03.840><c> 100,000</c> a million and then we restrict 100,000 a million and then we restrict
• then we will release the 10% restriction then we will release the 10% restriction<00:27:24.960><c> so

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• restrictions.
• </c> So, the 60% of the units that are income restricted, they're going to have the 10-year restriction
• So, I restrictions.
• </c> restricted. Correct. restricted. Correct.
• 10-year restrictions and the 10-year owner-occupant<00:45:39.520><c> restriction,</c><00:45:40.400><c

Bills: SB2069, SB2177, SB2342, SB2060, SB2544, SB3011, SB2061, SB2552

Keywords: SB2069, Hawaii housing, HHFDC, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, Dwelling Unit Revolving Fund, equity pilot program, housing affordability, homeownership, first-time homebuyer, for-sale housing, transit-oriented development, TOD, transit-oriented development zone, bus route, bus stop, critical workforce housing, health care workers, educators, law enforcement, correctional officers

Summary: The House Housing Committee opened its Friday morning hearing by noting potentially catastrophic flooding on the island and acknowledging that some members were absent helping their communities, so quorum for voting was uncertain. The committee then heard testimony on several housing-related measures, with most bills drawing support from housing agencies and community organizations and little or no opposition in the room. On SB 2069 SD2, SB 2177 SD2, and SB 2342 SD2, witnesses largely supported the measures. HHFDC supported SB 2069 and SB 2177, and HPHA supported SB 2342. For SB 2342, HHFDC raised concerns that the bill would alter the Qualified Allocation Plan outside the normal open, public process required by federal law and could exclude stakeholders; Kathy Charities echoed those concerns and also objected to changing point allocations in ways that could raise rents and weaken long-term affordability. Members questioned HHFDC about how the QAP is normally updated, the meaning of the point system, and whether a legislative working group could mandate changes; HHFDC said recommendations would still need public hearing and board approval. The committee also heard SB 2060 SD2, which would create a mixed-income subaccount in the rental housing revolving fund. HHFDC said the subaccount would likely use tier-two funds, estimated at about $100 million total, to support mixed-income projects above 60% AMI, citing Front Street Apartments as a possible example. Members asked about project selection and funding needs. On SB 2544 SD2, OHA opposed the bill’s Chapter 6E-related exemptions and mandatory review timelines, arguing that burial review protections should not be weakened and that the SPEED Task Force process was a better venue for streamlining. The sponsor later clarified that the bill was not meant to eliminate the 60-day review process but to make the deadline clearer. For SB 3011 SD1, which concerns public housing and pet ownership, HPHA and several humane organizations supported the measure, saying it would help low-income residents and seniors keep pets and benefit from animal companionship. HPHA explained its existing pet policy, including deposits, monthly fees, and restrictions, and said the requested funding would support ADA-accessible pet areas and related administration. Finally, on SB 2061 SD2, HCDA supported the bill while OHA opposed it unless protections for Hawaiian Crown and Government lands were strengthened. Committee members questioned the project’s 60/40 split between income-restricted and market-rate units, the 10-year owner-occupancy restriction, and the procurement exemption; the sponsor said the exemption was tied to a real estate transaction and that the project would still use 103D-like solicitation procedures. No votes were taken during the hearing, and several items were left for later action because quorum was uncertain.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've sponsored magazine restrictions, caliber restrictions, silencer restrictions, and bump stock restrictions
• </c> sponsored magazine restrictions, caliber sponsored magazine restrictions, caliber restrictions,<
• 00:19:12.799><c> silencer</c><00:19:13.360><c> restrictions,</c><00:19:13.919><c> and</c> restrictions
• , silencer restrictions, and restrictions, silencer restrictions, and bump<00:19:14.480><c> stock</c>
• <00:19:14.799><c> restrictions.

Keywords: HB 312 continued 00:00 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 25:16 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 27:27 Recess for ConC and Rules Meeting 28:33 ConC/Rules Report 33:45 Adjournment 35:21, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> trained on the use of restrictive trained on the use of restrictive procedures.<00:04:54.720><c>
• </c> restrictive procedures anymore. restrictive procedures anymore.
• We don't need restrictive seclusion.
• </c> in our data around restrictive in our data around restrictive procedures, procedures, procedures
• </c><01:26:59.600><c> procedure</c> were in terms of restrictive procedure were in terms of restrictive

Keywords: 1183, house