Video & Transcript Research : 'private projects'

Page 22 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Mar 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • components that make up wind and solar power facilities are included in the financial assurance that a project
  • , a project owner must obtain and deliver to the landowner when agreeing to the initial lease terms.
  • again, the provisions in chapter 301 and 302 for wind and solar decommissioning require, um, the project
  • than 57,000 restaurants, 1.5 million workers, making the restaurant industry in Texas the largest private
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 18th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Their most private spaces with men.
  • And that's a private facility?
  • No, those are not private spaces.
  • Well, if it applies to private dollars, then that's expanding the class.
  • It does apply to private entities; it says it in the code.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • receives payment but then fails to compensate their vendors. ...or laborers, and then abandons the project
  • Only the parties involved in the project may actually participate.
  • for resolving disputes and ensuring that payment for... ...flows as intended in Texas construction projects
  • It's because all these small private water systems already have an established relationship and protocol
  • The small private water utilities didn't have to report anything to anyone.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • While the original language had the PUC needing to take action for a project to interconnect, the substitute
  • For solar installations, it's 200 feet from a private residence and 100 feet from the property line.
  • But that also gives another bite at the apple for the public to weigh in on these projects.
  • the existing transmission lines, and I know ERCOT is working with various utilities to get those projects
  • The small private water utilities didn't have to report anything to any...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part I) Apr 3rd, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • While the original language had the PUC needing to take action for a project to interconnect, the substitute
  • It's 200 feet from a private residence and 100 feet from the property line.
  • course, I went and worked, okay, while the original language had PUC needing to take action for a project
  • It's 200 feet from a private residence and 100 feet from the property line.
  • But that also gives another bite at the apple for the public to weigh in on these projects.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce met with a quorum and first took up several pending and uncontested bills. It favorably reported SB 1405, SB 1762, SB 1977, SB 2077, SB 2148, and SB 1968, and also moved SB 2321 to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then heard SB 819, which would change how the Public Utility Commission reviews proposed utility-scale solar and related interconnection projects. The committee substitute would shift the default so interconnection is allowed unless the PUC affirmatively prohibits it within 180 days, limit denial to cases where harm substantially outweighs benefits, remove public meeting requirements, retain setback and financial assurance provisions, add optional application materials such as national security and environmental information, and restore local control over county tax abatements. The substitute was adopted and SB 819 was favorably reported to the full Senate on a 7-3 vote. The committee then took up SB 231, focused on CenterPoint’s use of large emergency generators after Hurricane Beryl. Senator King explained that the original bill was intended to prevent customers from being charged for non-mobile generators that were leased at great cost and did not match the bill’s emergency-response purpose. CenterPoint’s Jason Ryan apologized for the company’s communication failures and said the company would make customers whole through a combination of rate reductions, foregone storm-cost recovery, and a donation of the 15 large generators to ERCOT for about two years to address a San Antonio-area reliability issue, with the company absorbing the associated costs. PUC Executive Director Connie Corona said the commission could enforce the agreement through its contested-case process. Public testimony included consumer and reliability advocates, one of whom argued utility-scale microgrids should be preserved as a policy option. SB 231 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 986, which would create an alternative process for routine Public Information Act requests so local governments can make initial redactions without sending every routine exception to the Attorney General, while preserving an appeal path and training requirements. Supporters said it would reduce backlog and speed access to records; opponents argued it would shift the burden to requesters and encourage delay. The AG’s office testified that the process could improve efficiency and still fit within current timelines if used promptly. SB 986 was left pending. Finally, SB 584 was briefly laid out to require consumer reporting agencies that buy data from others to ensure the information complies with Texas law on excluded items such as bankruptcies, judgments, and tax liens, and SB 600 was heard on heir property. SB 600’s substitute would strengthen notice, require an attorney ad litem, add an heir’s bill of rights, allow settlement conferences, and require fair-market-value sales protections; supporters said it would curb predatory partition practices, while opponents warned some provisions could burden or diminish minority heirs’ property rights. SB 584 and SB 600 were left pending after testimony.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, and all combined, there were over 326 projects that divide them up into 42 classes and six different
  • They started this project November 8th and put in combined 20.7 hours. I was told.
  • He himself put in 235 hours on this project. The project started in September of last year.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chad Ennis on behalf of Honest Elections Project Action here in support of this bill.
  • But in 2021, Arizona did ban private money, is that right? That's correct.
  • Sir, would you agree that there's a difference between private money, political action committee money
  • Chad Ennis, Honest Elections Project Action here, Madam Chair, committee. Thank you.
  • Honest Elections Project Action here, Madam Chair, committee. I don't have anything else to add.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.