Video & Transcript Research : 'innovation fund'

Page 22 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Feb 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Richardson has long been a. beacon of innovation, economic growth, and strong civic engagement.
  • Are you in any unique position to make certain that the funding gets there?
  • Senate Bill 40, relating to the use by political subdivision of public funds to pay bail bonds.
  • Senate Bill 40 speaks to public funds.
  • Senate Bill 40, relating subdivision of public funds to pay bail bonds. Passage of SB 40.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/11/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Rivier is seeking $3.6 million in assistance from the state to fund an innovative $5.5 million plan to
  • There's not funding available through the utility Street and Alley funding process.
  • There's not funding available through the utility Street and Alley funding process.
  • Our funds are locked up in the PFA right now, so we need those funds.
  • PFA right now, so we need those funds unlocked through the revolving fund.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure May 5th, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • to the Veterans Service Grant Fund for use as provided by law.
  • One would be set up a reserve fund that just puts... ...could be done, okay?
  • One would be set up a reserve fund that just puts a certain amount into a reserve fund, a savings, okay
  • HB 603 provides relative to the authorized uses of public funds.
  • The proposal... ...the authorized uses of public funds.
Bills: HB165, HB603, SB77, SB140, SB185
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 4/13/26

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • pots of funding.
  • </c> of funding. of funding.
  • </c> long-term dedicated funding for transit. long-term dedicated funding for transit.
  • </c> the two general fund appropriations. the two general fund appropriations.
  • </c> are all out of the general fund. are all out of the general fund.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAM-CPN, WAM Public Hearings 04-07-2026

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • expenditure ceiling of $1 million for the automated victim information and notification system special fund
  • notification victim information and notification system<00:10:17.920><c> special</c><00:10:18.320><c> fund
  • </c><00:10:20.240><c> Not</c> system special fund. Any discussion? Not system special fund.
Summary: The joint Ways and Means and Consumer Protection meeting was a decision-making session on a series of House bills, with no oral testimony taken. The committees first acted on HB 2583, recommending passage on amended, and HB 1591, recommending passage with amendments related to health care. They also recommended passage on amended for HB 1749 on cesspools and HB 2423 on biodiesel, with each recommendation adopted by the members present. The committees then considered a second agenda block that included HB 2080, HB 1520, HB 1576, HB 1711, HB 1785, HB 1802, HB 1838, HB 1842, HB 1853, HB 1976, HB 2104, HB 2218, HB 2246, HB 2270, HB 2289, HB 2361, HB 2551, and HB 2606. Most were recommended for passage unamended and adopted without objection. HB 1520 was deferred because the Senate bill had already crossed over. HB 1711 was amended to replace the option period established by the corporation with a period of up to 10 years. HB 2289 was amended to remove repeal of a ceiling and set a $1 million expenditure ceiling for the automated victim information and notification system special fund. Several members noted reservations on HB 1842, which involved transfer of the Westridge parcel near a rail station; concerns were raised about the property’s value, the long-term lease status, and whether the city would actually accept or pursue the transfer. HB 1853 was passed unamended, with the committee noting the Lions Association had suggestions that could be addressed later in conference. HB 2218 was passed unamended while adopting DLNR testimony to clarify collaboration with community groups in stewarding public lands and recreational areas. In each case, the stated recommendations were adopted, often with members voting no with reservation rather than in opposition.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:01:30.560><c> source</c> mechanisms and then the funding source mechanisms and then the funding
  • </c> have an impact on the general fund have an impact on the general fund because<00:07:19.919><c> they
  • </c><00:07:42.720><c> should</c> so, the remainder of those funds should so, the remainder of those funds
  • </c> fun assistance funds have have run out. fun assistance funds have have run out.
  • </c> PAP funding. It's been cut dramatically. PAP funding. It's been cut dramatically.
Bills: HF3403, HF2687, HF2381
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 11th, 2026 at 09:06 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • They are currently paying for transportation for these funds through Medicaid funds.
  • funding.
  • Projects Fund.
  • out of the general fund?
  • funding this year.
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 11th, 2026 at 08:39 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2 coming out of the House currently has some funding.
  • We continue to fund at very high levels...
  • Well, what happened is slowly the funds were decreasing.
  • We fund these materials through the SDG.
  • We already fund these things. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 11th, 2026

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • funding.
  • funding.
  • funding.
  • Projects Fund.
  • funding this year.
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
Summary: The Senate Education Committee began by announcing that SB 210 would be rolled over to Friday and would not be heard. The committee then returned to SB 234, which would provide foster child school transportation funding statewide rather than only for Albuquerque Public Schools. Members adopted an amendment striking the APS-only language and making the bill statewide after testimony from the sponsor, PED, and others that foster youth transportation is a growing issue and should have its own funding stream. The committee discussed how the money might be distributed and whether the $1.2 million appropriation would be sufficient, then voted do pass on SB 234 as amended. The committee next heard HB 8, which creates a Higher Education Major Projects Fund for large capital projects that are difficult to fund through existing capital outlay processes. Testimony from the sponsor, LFC, HED, and university representatives explained that the bill would support projects such as the UNM School of Medicine, an NMSU multidisciplinary building, student housing, student life projects, and certain Division I athletic facilities, while requiring design readiness, institutional matches, and legislative oversight. Several senators raised concerns about the clarity of the prioritization process, the Division I-only athletics language, the recurring nature of future funding, and the relationship to other capital funding streams, but the committee ultimately voted do pass on HB 8. The committee then considered SB 243 and SB 244, nearly identical bills for UNM and NMSU that would each appropriate $5 million for student health, student support, nutrition, travel, scholarships, and other athletic department needs. Athletic directors testified that conference realignment, higher travel costs, nutrition demands, and new revenue-sharing/NIL obligations have increased expenses, and sponsors said the bills were intended as one-time appropriations. Some senators questioned whether the requests should be recurring or funded through university revenue rather than the state, but both bills received do pass recommendations. Finally, the committee heard SM 16, as amended, which asks HED to convene a task force to study parenting students in higher education and recommend ways to collect data and improve support. Supporters said better data is needed to understand barriers such as child care and transportation, and the memorial passed with a do pass recommendation. The committee then adjourned until Friday morning.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 11th, 2026

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2 coming out of the House currently has some funding.
  • Literacy coaches that we already have funded in the state.
  • Well, what happened is slowly the funds were decreasing.
  • We fund these materials through the SEG.
  • PERH funding for math professional development.
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 37, the High-Quality Literacy Instruction Act, which would strengthen reading instruction and educator preparation around the science of reading. The sponsor and supporters said the bill requires evidence-based, culturally and linguistically responsive literacy instruction, including support for English learners and students in bilingual and dual-language programs, use of approved high-quality instructional materials for K-3 reading and interventions, a K-3 reading assessment, literacy coaches, and parent progress reports. An amendment package was adopted to clarify biliteracy language, broaden references to bilingual/dual-language and Indigenous language settings, remove awkward phrasing, and adjust reporting requirements from monthly to four times per school year. The committee then moved forward with the amended bill. Public testimony was largely supportive. Students, educators, school leaders, advocacy groups, and tribal representatives said structured literacy has improved reading outcomes and can help struggling readers, including students with dyslexia and multilingual learners. Several speakers emphasized that the amended bill better protects bilingual, dual-language, and Native language programs, and some noted the importance of parent communication and early intervention. Supporters also cited recent literacy gains in New Mexico and said the bill aligns teacher preparation, materials, assessment, and coaching. Opposition focused mainly on concerns that the bill could still privilege English over Indigenous languages, that high-quality materials requirements may be too restrictive or costly for districts, and that testing and reporting could add workload. Tribal speakers from Acoma and Taos said they could not support the bill without further changes to explicitly protect Native language revitalization. Other opponents raised concerns about funding for materials and coaches, the burden on teachers, and whether the assessment and HQIM requirements would be flexible enough for local needs. In committee discussion, the sponsor and PED said existing funds and staff could support implementation, that the assessment would be formative and teacher-focused, and that the bill was intended to complement, not replace, Native and bilingual education programs.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 6th, 2026 at 09:10 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So is that no longer funded now, or have you removed that fund?
  • I probably was funded before. Mr.
  • I am — that's what funds our schools. That's what funds our teachers.
  • That's what funds our schools. That's what funds our teachers. I'm not running those bills.
  • to fund all of it.
Bills: SB204, SB241, HB34
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 6th, 2026

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Normally, we fund on prior-year numbers.
  • Is it a different type of funding? Like, what is going on there?
  • I definitely think we need to fix the funding.
  • Chair, who are going to be losing funding.
  • Chair, Pete, besides the funding in the unit value. Mr.
Bills: HB2, SB204, SB241, HB34
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 253, as substituted, which would create a framework for full-time virtual/distance learning programs in New Mexico. Sponsors and agency witnesses said the bill is intended to preserve virtual options while adding approval, reporting, and compliance requirements, including definitions for distance learning programs, annual reporting, renewal every three to five years, and a pause on new programs while existing ones are grandfathered for a period. They also said the bill addresses budget concerns by limiting enrollment growth units and excluding distance-learning students from certain funding calculations, including rural population units, to prevent unexpected losses in the state equalization guarantee. Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters included district superintendents and education officials who said the bill is needed to protect school funding, improve accountability, and gather basic data that the state currently lacks. Opponents included parents, students, teachers, charter-school representatives, and business and advocacy voices who argued virtual education has been lifesaving for medically fragile, bullied, rural, neurodivergent, and working students, and that the bill’s caps, geographic limits, and approval authority would reduce school choice and could eliminate some programs. Several witnesses stressed that virtual charter schools such as Pecos Cyber Academy and New Mexico Connections would not be affected, while others said the bill still reaches too broadly. Committee members raised extensive questions about the 10% enrollment cap, the adjacent-district requirement, the denial-and-appeal process, the treatment of charter schools versus district programs, and the effect on rural or small districts. Witnesses explained that the bill is meant to be temporary, with an interim study in 2026 to develop longer-term policy, but some members said they remained concerned about overreach and unintended consequences. No final vote or action on the bill was shown in the transcript excerpt.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Jan 14th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • and often unstable federal funding.
  • The training requirement is subject to funding and is null and void if funding is not provided.
  • I would also like to add that last year, OSPI quite correctly fully funded it out of state funds, not
  • Thank you very much. ...funded out of state funds, not levy.
  • This bill does not stop innovation.
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • looking at a redundant system's conflicting timelines, duplicated cybersecurity mandates, and vague funding
  • less than four mailings from either the state or my county clerk, which is a waste of our taxpayer funds
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2025-03-26

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • to fund community organizations.
  • My question: that's helpful to know, but in terms of the funding, how much of the funding is for stocking
  • Legacy funds are publicly acknowledged at every event.
  • Increased funding from the Legacy Fund through House File 1361 will help us expand cultural programming
  • I ask you to support House File 1631 to fund us.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Agriculture Committee Meeting - 2025-03-26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • One is moving unspent funds, the $4 million from the dairy program to farm to school.
  • Local small producers aren't able to access the funds.
  • , especially when we're losing some federal funding.
  • Wouldn't this be better funded by the DNR?
  • I think you might be referring to the AFIS funding.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • received may not in possible that funds received may not in fact<00:18:31.679><c> be</c><00:18:31.840
  • from the general fund, and hopefully this committee can get to support.
  • </c><00:52:31.240><c> from</c><00:52:31.839><c> the</c> when we're asking funding from the when we're
  • asking funding from the general<00:52:32.280><c> fund</c><00:52:32.799><c> and</c><00:52:33.040><c>
  • hopefully</c><00:52:33.480><c> this</c> general fund and hopefully this general fund and hopefully this
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so this um uh access the funds.
  • </c><00:09:53.120><c> Representative</c> increased funding. Okay. Representative increased funding.
  • So, thank losing some federal funding.
  • </c> Wouldn't this be better uh funding Wouldn't this be better uh funding coming<00:27:12.159><c> out
  • And the million out of the general fund.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Legacy Finance Committee 3/26/25

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • to fund community organizations.
  • funding to fund community additional own funding to fund community organizations.<00:22:48.720><c> So
  • </c><00:57:30.960><c> funding</c> pillar of those communities. funding pillar of those communities. funding
  • </c><01:03:21.119><c> to</c> bill House Filing 2471 for funding to bill House Filing 2471 for funding
  • 35.679><c> provided</c> Sturgeon Project Funding provided Sturgeon Project Funding provided and<01:10