Video & Transcript Research : 'fund usage'

Page 22 of 500
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then we had just talked about changing it into a loan fund, a low-interest loan fund.
  • Changing it into a loan fund, a low-interest loan fund.
  • funding.
  • funding, it'd be really hard to fund it at a local level.
  • So there's actually a fund.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee first discussed a wastewater infrastructure bill, centered on whether state support should be provided as a grant or through the existing Clean Water State Revolving Fund as a low-interest loan program. Department of Environmental Quality official David Brushwine explained that the SRF already finances wastewater projects, can leverage federal funds with state bond proceeds, and could accommodate the Washburn, Lincoln, and Peasant projects if they are ready to proceed. Members noted that losing federal grant support would make projects harder for local residents to afford because costs would be recovered through utility rates or special assessments, but the projects would still be eligible for loans. Senator Magrum indicated he would likely concur with the budget after this discussion, and the bill was set aside for later consideration. The committee then turned to a proposed amendment for a four-plex housing project for people with disabilities or other special needs. Senator Mathern described Sections 7 and 8 as creating a design consultation appropriation and a revolving loan fund modeled on existing hospital and nursing home loan programs, while Section 9 would transfer $3.3 million from the state infrastructure fund. Members debated ownership, rent subsidies, repayment terms, and whether the state should finance the project directly or leave it to a private developer with Department of Human Services oversight. Concerns were raised that the state should not own the housing and that the proposal needed more work to be workable, but the committee ultimately reached consensus to adopt Sections 7 and 8 and leave out Section 9 for further conference committee discussion. The committee also reviewed provider inflation and long-term care rate issues, with members discussing whether to support a 2% and 1.5% inflation adjustment and how to handle the $5-per-day basic care rate. Staff explained that the $5 payment was already in the base budget, but members debated whether it should remain ongoing or be treated as one-time funding and paired with a study of rate rebasing. The committee agreed to have draft language prepared to remove the $5 from the base budget and add study language, then moved the bill forward for drafting.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so are those other funds something that would be counted as general fund, or is that an error on
  • That's funds from the revenue, so it should be in our long sheet on the general fund.
  • Yes, general funds should be reduced and other funds should be increased. Right.
  • And although it doesn't decrease your general fund or your SIF fund, it will at least show that there
  • Is that federal funds that flow into that? Human Services Finance Fund?
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee met to review revised long sheets and section-by-section language for a human services/health budget bill, with much of the discussion focused on how to present block grant funding and full-time equivalent (FTE) positions for behavioral health clinics and CCBHCs. Members debated whether to keep FTE counts in the budget at all, ultimately leaning toward removing or zeroing out the FTE references while keeping the dollar authority, and reducing the salaries-and-wages block grant by about $4.75 million. They also discussed public health federal authority, agreeing to remove about $60 million in unused federal spending authority tied to COVID-era funds, and clarified that if federal money later becomes available it could be requested through the Emergency Commission. A major topic was the provider inflation increase. The House version had 2% and 2%, while members debated alternatives and appeared to settle, at least for further work, on 2% in the first year and 1.5% in the second year, with staff asked to recalculate the fiscal impact. The committee also reviewed FMAP changes, noting a revised 2027 FMAP estimate and its effect on general fund and other funds, and discussed whether to adjust public health and other line items accordingly. Several members emphasized that many of these numbers are still tentative and will be refined before final action. The committee also touched on several policy items and capital-related provisions, including behavioral health services, Medicaid expansion, the moratorium on new ICF beds, and a proposed amendment for a medical homes/fourplex-related item that would show a $400,000 legislative investment with repayment from a developer. There was extended discussion of the All True hospital/facility proposal, with some members favoring leaving it in with a smaller initial commitment and others preferring to remove it and revisit later in conference committee. The meeting ended with staff asked to continue updating the bill language and members instructed to review remaining sections before the next meeting; no final votes were taken in the portion provided.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 7th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, Senator Davidson, it's a $4 million general fund impact. Okay.
  • Why is there a $4 million general fund impact for adopting this language?
  • Is appropriately funded. But it's a potential withhold.
  • I would say I'd prefer not come from general funds, just in general.
  • Okay, I see that it does say the funding provided under this section is considered a one-time funding
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources division met with a quorum and spent much of the meeting on a proposed “medical home” concept for people with significant disabilities and medical needs. Matt Schwartz described the need for small, community-based homes so adults like his daughter could live in a least-restrictive setting without losing housing if service providers change. Architect Jeff Eubel presented a conceptual budget for one roughly 5,000-square-foot facility for four residents, explaining that the design would likely include four large sleeping units, common space, support areas, and medical infrastructure such as emergency power, oxygen, sprinklers, and accessibility features. Committee members and George Sink, joining by phone, raised questions about layout, zoning, ownership, staffing, and whether families would actually move loved ones into such facilities if they were far from home. The department said the concept was not in the governor’s budget and identified staff who could continue discussions; the committee did not take final action and instead discussed refining the language with interested members. The committee then turned to amendments related to long-term care and behavioral health funding. One amendment would reduce a planned $4 million general fund incentive payment and instead create a withhold-based quality program for nursing facilities, to be developed collaboratively by the department and providers and reported to Legislative Management by September 2026. The department said it could live with the language but preferred the governor’s timing; several senators questioned whether the committee should be directing an operational policy change and whether the study would simply delay implementation. No vote was taken, and the amendment was set aside for later consideration. A second amendment would clarify use of an existing $2 million general fund item for behavioral health services in nursing homes and basic care facilities, directing it toward training, technical assistance, consultation, and direct patient care for residents with medically based behavioral health disorders. Members noted the funding was already in the bill and discussed it in the context of other budget items, but again deferred action. The committee also clarified that a separate $750,000 juvenile justice diversion appropriation in House Bill 1425 was distinct from a similar amount in the budget and should likely remain in that separate bill. The chair indicated a goal of having amendments ready by the end of the week, and the committee recessed without final votes on the discussed items.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • developing sustainable funding developing sustainable funding strategies<00:18:42.480> another
  • pursue pursue all available funding pursue pursue all available funding streams<00:46:47.640>
  • via sustained Federal funding streams via sustained Federal funding Medicaid<00:46:51.359> support
  • 00:54:03.760> over perspective for you we will fund over perspective for you we will fund over
  • We had a lot of one-time funding and not ongoing funding, so you got some of the one-time funding, which
Bills: HF2090, HF982, HF2229
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Feb 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • bringing home more than $130 million $30 million, $45 million in 2021, and $885 million in 2023 to fund
  • My hope is that we are able to bring more state funding during this legislative session to help University
  • has embarked and is currently completing a large new cancer hospital system that has been privately funded
  • this disease here in our state for decades they've been providing not only life-saving research and funding
  • She also participated in cross-country biking events. to raise awareness and funds for the Leukemia and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Feb 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • To be clear, 80% of the dollars authorized by this historic amount of funding will go directly to raises
  • The remaining 20% of the funding in this legislation spans the Teacher Incentive Allotment, TIA, because
  • It will be up Permanent allotment and funding stream established in the budget for our teacher outside
  • As you know, in the past, we have struggled in trying to fund.
  • for public schools. to be allocated for teachers only and restrict the amount of funds that could be
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II): Joint Session Feb 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do it because you have a constitutional obligation to fund the judicial branch at a level that allows
  • That dedication remains and the court appreciates the legislature's continued funding for these programs
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Feb 24th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The program is privately funded, it's relying on support. from the public through donations, merchandise
  • fishing license of any type to make a donation of $1, $5, $10, or $20 to the Operation Game Thief Fund
  • So including the option to donate to the fund on license applications will make a significant difference
  • . impact on the amount of donations that the fund receives.
  • It is a completely different animal than this brand registration that we're receive no funding for.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Water and Agriculture and Rural Affairs convened under the leadership of Chairman Kelly Hancock, who opened the meeting with a prayer in remembrance of Chairman Perry, who was absent due to a personal loss. The session focused on the discussions surrounding SB384, which aims to support the longstanding initiative known as Operation Game Thief. Senator Flores presented the bill, emphasizing its essential role in the fight against poaching through public support. The operation has a successful track record of convictions but is currently dependent on donations and merchandise sales for funding. The committee aimed to vote on multiple bills during this session, contingent on achieving a quorum. Notably, discussions also revolved around fiscal notes on two bills that were set aside for later consideration, indicating the committee's intention to carefully manage their legislative decisions. The meeting showcased a productive atmosphere, with committee members actively engaged in the review and potential advancement of key legislative measures.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 2/12/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • to avoid a funding cliff at a time when more Minnesotans than ever are experiencing food insecurity.
  • It was originally funded at $1 million a year for fiscal years 24 and 25, and funding is now cut in half
  • to avoid a funding cliff at a time when more Minnesotans than ever are experiencing food insecurity.
  • It was originally funded at $1 million a year for fiscal years 24 and 25, and funding is now cut in half
  • HF 45 would address this by avoiding a SNAP outreach funding cliff this summer, and they respectfully
Bills: HF22, HF45
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 2ND REVISED Apr 14th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • This would still require them to do it once a week, so they're not going to hold these funds for long
  • And it goes into a trust fund. That fund is then held.
  • That estimate is inclusive of those dollars that are carried over through that fund.
  • I I do have some discomfort about the potential funding mechanism here.
  • states that when donations are received, those monies will not be included as part of the general fund
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - House Transportation & Infrastructure

Transportation & Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • We've had some funds through the AZ SMART Fund.
  • competitive grant funding.
  • this SMART Fund support.
  • grant funding.
  • this SMART Fund support.
Summary: The committee heard an ADOT presentation on Interstate 11, SR 347, the I-10 Wild Horse Pass corridor, and the I-40/US 93 West Kingman project. ADOT said the I-11 corridor remains under a federal lawsuit covering the full 280-mile route from Mexico to Nevada, with a Tier 1 reevaluation underway and public outreach expected later in the year, concluding in early 2027. ADOT said segmentation of the corridor would add time and cost, and that current work is limited to pre-NOI Tier 2 activities and other allowed planning steps. For SR 347, ADOT described widening, intersection upgrades, two grade separations, and a schedule that could begin construction in summer pending clearances. For I-10, ADOT outlined four widening projects adding a third lane each way, interchange reconstructions, a new interchange at Coley Road, and corridor-wide freeway management systems, with completion expected by late 2029. For the West Kingman I-40/US 93 project, ADOT said the $106.5 million project is about 60% complete and should finish in early 2027; members asked about temporary traffic control near Beale Street and possible additional signage or signals on the corridor. Members also raised local traffic and safety concerns on the SR 347 and I-10 projects, including signal timing, median barriers, construction hours, truck traffic, and the need for clearer driver education and digital signs. ADOT said it would look into signal optimization, possible temporary fixes, and additional signage, and noted the I-10 corridor total cost is just under $1 billion, funded through a mix of MAG, federal, and state money. On I-40, members also discussed a possible temporary traffic light near Beale Street to improve safety and access. The committee then moved to a series of transportation appropriation bills and announced a mass-motion process for the projects. Staff explained HB 2067 for Apache Junction ($29.4 million), HB 2068 for the Wolford Road extension in Show Low ($6.5 million), HB 2164 for Ray Lane improvements in Graham County ($3.73 million), HB 2200 for SR 89 widening in Chino Valley ($36 million, contingent on a $1 million local commitment), HB 2201 for Sedona SR 89A/Forest Road/Ranger Road projects ($8.03 million), and HB 2304, the ARTEC bill, which appropriates about $473 million for multiple highway projects statewide. Witnesses from Show Low, Eloy, Coolidge, Casa Grande, Lake Havasu City, Clarkdale, San Luis, Yuma, and Yavapai County testified in support of their local projects, emphasizing congestion relief, freight movement, emergency evacuation, safety, economic development, and local matching funds. No final votes were taken in the portion provided; the chair indicated the committee would proceed with a mass motion on the project bills after testimony.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EDU Public Hearing 02-04-2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So fund those schools is astronomical.
  • places that they can turn to for funding places that they can turn to for funding or<00:46:38.160
  • Um, our primary concern is with the special fund.
  • Um, we concern is with the special fund.
  • A special fund.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 29th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The legislature funded a feasibility study last session. The results are clear.
  • the same high standards as other Texas law schools, and we explicitly allow partnerships gifts to fund
  • Two years ago the legislature funded a feasibility study and you have in front of you the results of
  • We just need help with funding and with Texas Against Vandal we are a non-profit organization.
  • We're not going to get out of the big fund because of the competition.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Apr 16th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, um, and a lot of states have limited it to just approved funds that can invest on behalf of the investor
  • In this bill, up to 10% of a fund ... ...in this bill, up to 10% of a fund that they're investing in.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to our general fund meeting.
  • We do not need any additional employees nor any additional funding to do anything in this bill.
  • Eventually, that will lead to us needing more auditors and more funding if we do not tie that to the
  • or educational fund.
  • Would this money then go to fund those sorts of activities? No, no. Um, no. It's very simple.