Transcript Highlights:

• for Medicaid and exchange advisory committee to include individuals who are also members of the beneficiary
• for Medicaid and exchange advisory committee to include individuals who are also members of the beneficiary
• for Medicaid and exchange advisory committee to include individuals who are also members of the beneficiary
• for Medicaid and exchange advisory committee to include individuals who are also members of the beneficiary
• advisory committee as of the beneficiary advisory committee as required<00:15:43.120><c> by</c><00:15

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Pursuant to R.S. 39:14.03, as Southern University is the ultimate beneficiary, I would note that the
• The purchaser is Raymond James and Associates; the Louisiana Public Facilities Authority; the beneficiary
• Pursuant to RS 3914.03, as Southern University is the ultimate beneficiary.
• The beneficiary is Southern University, Scott's Bluff Housing LLC.
• The beneficiary is Southern University, Scott's Bluff Housing LLC, principal amount not exceeding $60

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Summary: The State Bond Commission met on May 21 with a quorum present and approved the April 16 minutes. The commission then reviewed and approved a large slate of local government and public authority financing requests, including election propositions for the November ballot, water and sewer infrastructure projects, fire protection and recreation district bonds, school board financing, and several refunding transactions. Most items were found to meet technical requirements and were approved on motions by Speaker DeVillier and seconded by Senator Talbot. Among the more notable items were the East Baton Rouge City-Parish refunding bonds for the Greater Baton Rouge Airport District, the City of Kenner’s retroactive approval request tied to a convention center agreement with GMB Basketball LLC, a Louisiana Housing Corporation financing increase for the Federal City Building 10 affordable housing project, and preliminary approval for the Northwest Louisiana Finance Authority’s Petro Tower redevelopment in Shreveport. The commission also approved financing for Southern University’s Scott’s Bluff student housing project and the Crescent City Schools/Harriet Tubman Charter School project. The Crescent City Schools item prompted questions about how MFP funds are used; staff explained that lease payments would support the bonds and that MFP funds are generally split between educational expenses and facilities-related costs. The commission received six monthly cost-of-issuance reports, which required no action, and a status update on the state debt schedule. It also approved Resolution No. 2 authorizing up to $425 million in general obligation refunding bonds to refund the Series 2016 bonds and tender other outstanding bonds for savings, with pricing tentatively set for June 16 and closing for June 30. During other business, New Orleans City Council President J.P. Morel thanked the commission for its role in helping address the city’s fiscal crisis and for approving a charter amendment election item aimed at strengthening budget oversight. The meeting adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• Pursuant to R.S. 39:14.03, as Southern University is the ultimate beneficiary, I would note that the
• The purchaser is Raymond James and Associates; the Louisiana Public Facilities Authority; the beneficiary
• Pursuant to RS 3914.03, as Southern University is the ultimate beneficiary.
• The beneficiary is Southern University, Scott's Bluff Housing LLC.
• The beneficiary is Southern University, Scott's Bluff Housing LLC, principal amount not exceeding $60

Summary: The State Bond Commission met on May 21, established a quorum, approved the April 16 minutes, and then considered a long agenda of bond, refunding, and election-related requests. Items 3 through 10 were election propositions for the November 3 ballot involving ad valorem taxes, parcel fees, and charter amendments for purposes such as fire protection, agricultural centers, neighborhood security, recreation, aging services, drainage, and roads and bridges; staff said they met technical and legal requirements, and the commission approved them. The commission also approved several local financings, including water and sewer projects, fire district equipment and facility improvements, school board and parish bonds, and refunding transactions for the East Baton Rouge City-Parish and St. James Parish School Board. A retroactive approval request from the City of Kenner related to a CEA with GMB Basketball LLC was discussed; staff made no recommendation because it was retroactive, but noted it appeared to be an oversight, and item 22, the related airport district agreement, was approved. The commission approved additional financing for the Louisiana Housing Corporation’s Federal City Building 10 affordable housing project, a preliminary approval for the Northwest Louisiana Finance Authority’s Petro Tower redevelopment in Shreveport, and two Louisiana Public Facilities Authority projects: Southern University’s Scott’s Bluff student housing project and the Crescent City Schools project for Harriet Tubman Charter School. During discussion of the Crescent City Schools financing, a commissioner asked about the use of MFP funds; staff explained that lease payments would be the repayment source and that MFP dollars are generally split between educational expenses and facilities costs, with the school’s typical split around 72% instructional and 28% administrative/facilities-related. Both items were approved. The commission then received six cost-of-issuance reports for previously approved bond issues, with various fee adjustments but no motions required. It also reviewed a debt schedule update and adopted Resolution No. 2 authorizing up to $425 million in general obligation refunding bonds to refund Series 2016 bonds and tender other outstanding bonds for savings, with pricing tentatively set for June 16 and closing for June 30. In other business, the commission heard a brief public comment from New Orleans City Council President J.P. Morrell thanking the commission for helping place a charter amendment on the ballot to improve New Orleans budgeting transparency and oversight. The meeting ended after monthly reports were noted and no further business was raised.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm wrong, but the way I understand it, most of these policies, the employee is not actually a beneficiary
• And last question, I assume that the bank is always the beneficiary of these policies.
• The bank's the owner and a beneficiary. It's an asset of the bank.
• The bank endorses over the right to name a beneficiary on a portion of the death benefit.
• The death benefit is split between the bank and the employee for his or her beneficiary.

Committee: House Insurance

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> water and site design. water and site design.
• any um country that's any designate any um country that's designated<01:13:46.840><c> as</c><01:13:46.920
• </c> designated as a foreign adversary. designated as a foreign adversary.
• > an</c><01:41:23.920><c> employer</c> Has been designated by an employer Has been designated by an employer
• designations, or other beneficiary designations, or other authorizations<02:06:40.240><c> that</c><02

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, the bill adopts a broad set of health care priorities, all designed to strengthen Florida's ability
• The only change we're making with respect to something that the beneficiary can currently do is a self-attestation
• Bit for the SNAP beneficiary and DCF.
• hasn't set forth what documentation is allowable, how will the eligible—or maybe even ineligible—beneficiaries

Transcript Highlights:

• and that the accompanying House bills, as amended, pass second reading and be referred to their designated
• During our water and land hearing, I heard compelling testimony from Native Hawaiian beneficiaries that
• represented representation of these two serving members and thank you for the opportunity to share. beneficiaries
• that have served or are beneficiaries that have served or are serving<00:41:50.760><c> on</c><00:41:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• in agreement that the manner in which it is currently set up works in the best interest of the beneficiaries
• They do not think outside influence from these supposed experts will be beneficial for the beneficiaries
• 00:14:27.199><c> interest</c><00:14:27.560><c> of</c><00:14:27.720><c> the</c><00:14:27.839><c> beneficiaries
• </c> the best interest of the beneficiaries the best interest of the beneficiaries as<00:14:28.759><c
• </c> will be beneficial for the beneficiaries will be beneficial for the beneficiaries um<00:14:51.240

Committee: House Labor

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Which um they're the primary beneficiaries of the CETFs, so they are stakeholders.
• Insurance and financial systems are designed to remove barriers and are instead creating them.
• Insurance and financial systems are designed to remove barriers and are instead creating them.
• Insurance and financial systems are designed to remove barriers and are instead creating them.
• Insurance and financial systems are designed to remove barriers and are instead creating them.

Bills: SB2433 , SB2047 , SB2425 , SB3045 , SB2761 , SB3001 , SB2852 , SB2471

Committee: House Consumer Protection & Commerce

Keywords: condominium governance, education trust fund, unit owners, real estate, dispute resolution, financial obligations, community representation, pharmacy benefit managers, maximum allowable cost, transparency, drug pricing, insurance commissioner, contracting pharmacies, healthcare, substance use disorder, SUD, addiction treatment, behavioral health, mental health, rehabilitation

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2433 SD1 relating to condominiums, which would direct the condominium education trust fund toward educational resources for unit owners and require the Real Estate Commission to ensure owners’ interests are represented in funded activities and related rulemaking. Supporters, including the Hawaii Real Estate Commission and a condominium owner advocate, said owners need a seat at the table in condo governance and education efforts. Committee discussion focused on whether the bill was necessary, with the Real Estate Commission indicating it could already use the trust fund for owner education and that owners are already considered stakeholders, though not through a specific commission seat. No vote was taken during the excerpted discussion. The committee then took up SB 2047 SD2 HD1 on pharmacy benefit managers, which would set requirements for maximum allowable cost reimbursement, allow reverse-and-rebill claims after successful appeals, and authorize fines for violations. The Insurance Division offered comments, the Hawaii Pharmacists Association supported the measure with amendments and suggested future PBM reform funding, and Kaiser Permanente requested a technical amendment. A committee question raised whether the staffing and resource request for implementation was too large for a bill focused only on MAC pricing, and the witness said he would provide more data to the next committee. No final action was shown. Next was SB 2425 SD2 HD1 on health insurance and substance use disorder treatment, requiring insurers to honor written assignments of benefits to SUD providers and prohibiting anti-assignment clauses. Supporters described patients being unable to access treatment because of high out-of-pocket costs and said direct payment would reduce harm for people in recovery. HMSA opposed the bill but said it would begin direct payments to non-participating SUD facilities effective March 27, while continuing to object to the assignment-of-benefits portion because of fraud and balance-billing concerns; the Hawaii Association of Health Plans also opposed. Members questioned HMSA about reimbursement mechanics and why the bill was needed if coverage policies were already changing. Finally, the committee heard SB 3045 SD1 HD1, which would require coverage of continuous glucose monitors and related supplies, including for Medicaid managed care, under certain conditions. DHS and the Insurance Division offered comments, while SHPDA, Hilo Benioff Medical Center Foundation, and others supported the bill, citing inconsistent access and a case in which a woman allegedly died after being denied a CGM. HMSA said it already covers medically necessary CGMs and had updated its policy in 2025 for type 1 and insulin-dependent patients, but it raised concerns about expanding mandated coverage to type 2 and gestational diabetes and about supply impacts. The committee also discussed whether the bill duplicated existing coverage standards and why it had been introduced repeatedly. No votes or final dispositions were included in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each large county's program is unique in its design and features.
• beneficiaries in Santa Clara County.
• I suspect you know this well, but Medi-Cal is designed to be a partnership between the state and the
• I suspect you know this well, but Medi-Cal is designed to be a partnership between the state and the
• It is designed to reduce the administrative burden for both individual clients and county workers.

Summary: The subcommittee heard an extended briefing on the impacts of H.R. 1 on Medi-Cal and CalFresh, followed by testimony from the Legislative Analyst’s Office and county officials. DHCS described major Medi-Cal changes in H.R. 1, including work/community engagement requirements, six-month redeterminations, reduced federal matching for some emergency services, narrower immigrant eligibility, reduced retroactive coverage, and limits on provider taxes and directed payments. CDSS outlined CalFresh changes, especially the expanded able-bodied adults without dependents time limit, reduced exemptions and waivers, and the new federal-state-county administrative cost split. Both departments emphasized implementation plans, automation, outreach, and county coordination, while acknowledging significant expected coverage losses and administrative burden. The LAO and an independent policy expert discussed how H.R. 1 could increase demand on county indigent care systems and public hospitals as people lose Medi-Cal. They reviewed the history of county indigent care, 1991 realignment, and AB 85, explaining that counties already rely on a patchwork of funding and that current realignment revenues are often used for public health rather than indigent care. They warned that counties may face large increases in uninsured residents, with wide variation in how counties respond, and raised concerns about equity, financing, and whether a more standardized state-county program should be created. Committee members pressed witnesses on county funding, exemptions, homelessness, older adults, undocumented residents, and the effect of administrative burden versus true ineligibility. County representatives from Los Angeles, Santa Clara, Tulare, and San Bernardino described the expected local impacts and asked for additional state support. They said H.R. 1 would drive major losses in Medi-Cal and CalFresh enrollment, increase uncompensated care, strain eligibility staff, and worsen homelessness and food insecurity. Several counties urged the Legislature to fund eligibility workers, preserve enrollment, and consider a CalFresh match waiver; Santa Clara and San Bernardino also cited local tax measures and staffing reductions already underway. No formal vote or committee action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each large county's program is unique in its design and features.
• beneficiaries in Santa Clara County.
• These systems provide backbone health care services, obviously to Medi-Cal beneficiaries, as you heard
• I suspect you know this well, but Medi-Cal is designed to be a partnership between the state and the
• It is designed to reduce the administrative burden for both individual clients and county workers.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If the counties are designated in this bill, it will require a cost share with the state.
• If the counties are designated in this bill, it will require a cost share with the state.
• House Bill 1233 that went through your committee earlier, that bill designated, um, uh, this bill designates
• If the counties are designated in this bill, it will require a cost share with the state.
• If the counties are designated in this bill, it will require a cost share with the state.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The hearing opened with committee procedures and then took up SB 1, relating to vegetation management near utility lines. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it would shift rights, responsibilities, and liability onto the state and private landowners. Hawaiian Electric supported the measure with amendments, describing it as a first step to address wildfire risk and improve public safety and system reliability. The Hawaii Farm Bureau and Command Schools both raised concerns that the bill could impose significant costs, liability, and access burdens on farmers, ranchers, and other landowners, especially where easements are old or unclear. Life of the Land argued the issue belongs before the Public Utilities Commission, and PUC staff explained that the commission is already reviewing Hawaiian Electric’s wildfire mitigation plan and vegetation management in a docket, with a decision expected by September and public meetings scheduled for April 23 and 24. Committee members questioned the need for legislation versus negotiated solutions, and witnesses said private parties could potentially renegotiate easements without statute. The committee then heard HB 1296, relating to disaster recovery. DLNR and OPSD supported the bill, saying it would ease regulatory burdens in post-disaster rebuilding and help speed permit review. Testimony and member questions focused on the bill’s five-year rebuilding timeline, the role of the coastal zone/SMA process, and how long permit reviews typically take; OPSD said SMA major/use permits generally take about six months, while minor permits are faster. Members also discussed whether the bill would apply to existing structures damaged in disasters and whether the amendments from the Attorney General’s office and OPSD were acceptable; no objections were raised. Finally, the committee heard SB 1170, relating to the expeditious redevelopment and development of affordable rental housing. HHFDC supported the bill, and testimony from a Maui affordable housing project said the measure is needed to rebuild the Weinberg Court Apartments, a 63-unit affordable project in Lahaina, using insurance funds rather than government money. Members asked whether the bill would help existing affordable rental projects damaged before the enactment of related coastal rules, and the response was that the bill is aimed at existing structures damaged during events and intended to speed rebuilding of affordable housing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, highlighting this bill would interfere with benefit design, as Curtis said.
• </c><01:52:13.599><c> to</c> legislative Solutions designed to legislative Solutions designed to eliminate
• Only the funds spent directly by the beneficiary, and not on their behalf, count toward the beneficiary
• </c><01:53:52.599><c> and</c> spent directly by the beneficiary and spent directly by the beneficiary
• <01:53:55.320><c> deductible</c><01:53:55.840><c> or</c> beneficiary deductible or beneficiary deductible

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Murphy, to designate special orders. Mr.
• President, pursuant to Rule 26, I designate the following bills be made special orders for immediate
• special orders Senator Murphy designate special orders Senator Murphy Mr<00:10:38.000><c> President<
• the following bills be made designate the following bills be made special<00:10:42.160><c> orders</c
• A transfer-on-death deed is a deed that transfers real property to a named beneficiary when the owner

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill here requires beneficiaries of a transfer on death to actually file some paperwork so that
• So imagine I put in a deed, then I name my next-door neighbors the beneficiary transferee.
• . beneficiary transfere I the transferer beneficiary transfere I the transferer um<00:05:15.039><c> and
• So each beneficiary of the transfer-on-death deed—what if there's multiple?
• </c> two properties then the beneficiary two properties then the beneficiary would<00:07:57.680><c> record

Committee: Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• thing, where an HOA, for example, would have an insurance policy that I, as a condo owner, and the beneficiary
• in effect, the... ...condo owner and the beneficiary in effect.
• to insurance fraud, other crimes that impact the insurance industry, for insurance consumers or beneficiaries
• It defines insurance fraud as a crime in state law and recognizes insurance consumers and beneficiaries
• , and not intended to duplicate the OIC's existing robust, For beneficiaries and not intended to duplicate

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on an amended and restated tribal-state gaming compact with the Squaxin Island Tribe. Washington State Gambling Commission staff explained the compact amendment process and said the restatement consolidates six prior amendments, updates several appendices, and adds new provisions including high-limit room options and electronic table games. Squaxin Island representatives said the changes clarify the existing compact, improve casino regulation and management, and support tribal economic development and community services. Committee members expressed support, and the compact will next go through additional commission and legislative review before possible governor approval. The committee then heard Senate Bill 5831, which enacts the Uniform Mortgage Modification Act. Staff and the bill sponsor said the measure creates safe harbors for common mortgage modifications, clarifies when modifications must be recorded, and preserves the priority of modified mortgages in foreclosure without preempting other mortgage or lending laws. A Uniform Law Commission representative testified that the bill would advance protections by reducing uncertainty and costly attorney opinion requirements. There was no opposition testimony, and the public hearing closed without a vote. Senate Bill 6178, requested by the Insurance Commissioner, would prohibit contractors and others from soliciting or requiring post-loss assignments of property insurance benefits from insureds, making such agreements void and enforceable by the commissioner with civil penalties. The sponsor, Insurance Commissioner, and several supporters said the bill would protect homeowners after disasters from losing control of their claims and help prevent contractor abuse; a consumer attorney, PEMCO, and the National Insurance Crime Bureau also supported it. The committee then heard Senate Bill 6031, which expands and modernizes the state’s insurance fraud laws, classifies insurance fraud as a Class B felony, broadens reporting and investigative authority, and extends the fraud program to related crimes affecting insurers and consumers. The Insurance Commissioner, anti-fraud groups, and industry representatives supported the bill, while the Washington Society of CPAs said concerns about CPA language would be addressed by amendment. After public hearings, the committee moved to executive session, adopted a proposed substitute for SB 5928, and voted do-pass recommendations for SB 5928 as amended and SB 5919, sending both to Rules.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are designing and delivering comprehensive trainings, flowcharts, and other tools to help support
• In the 35 rural counties served by CMSP, over 124,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries could lose their health
• The main beneficiaries of food assistance, The issue for me is about fairness and equity.
• The main beneficiaries of food assistance to mitigate the impact of HR1.
• The main beneficiaries of food assistance are the elderly and children. That is true.

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee held an oversight hearing on the impacts of H.R. 1 on California’s safety net, focusing on Medi-Cal and CalFresh. The chair and vice chair framed the issue as a major federal disruption that would reduce benefits and shift costs to the state, counties, hospitals, and other local systems. The first panel included the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the Department of Finance, the UC Berkeley Labor Center, and the Food Research and Action Center, each describing projected enrollment losses, higher state and county costs, and implementation challenges. The LAO outlined H.R. 1’s main changes: new and expanded work requirements, more frequent eligibility redeterminations, restrictions on certain non-citizen eligibility, and financing changes affecting provider taxes and federal matching rates. The LAO estimated that 1 to 2 million people could be disenrolled from Medi-Cal and more than 600,000 could lose CalFresh, with additional costs from reduced federal support and possible state and county administrative burdens. The Department of Finance said the Governor’s budget includes about $1.4 billion General Fund in 2026-27 to respond to H.R. 1, with larger out-year reductions in federal funds and projected Medi-Cal caseload losses of up to 2 million by 2029-30. The UC Berkeley Labor Center projected up to 3 million Californians could lose full-scope Medi-Cal by 2028 when H.R. 1 is combined with state budget changes, while noting the state could choose policies that would reduce some of those losses. The Food Research and Action Center warned that CalFresh cuts and time limits would increase hunger, worsen health outcomes, and strain local economies and emergency systems. Members questioned the witnesses about procedural disenrollments, regional variation, the overall growth in Medi-Cal spending, the future of the MCO tax, the CalFresh error rate, and the downstream effects on hospitals and county indigent care. Several senators argued that the federal law was driven by tax cuts for high-income earners and would disproportionately harm low-income Californians, immigrants, and communities of color. Administration witnesses said some impacts are still being analyzed, that counties and departments are working on implementation, and that the Legislature may need to use statute, reporting, and oversight tools as federal guidance develops. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• When we go through our normal processes, we get a designer that works on it as the designer.
• But in general, in that process, the designer works for the contractor, so I cannot tell the designer
• When the designers reach out to contractors during the design period, the contractors will not share
• When we go through our normal processes, we get a designer that works on it as the designer.
• We get a designer that works on it as the designer.

Committee: Senate Ways and Means

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee took up House Bill 422, relating to school impact fees. The Education Committee recommended passage with amendments, and Ways and Means concurred. The amendments would repeal the construction fee component of the school impact fee while retaining the land impact fee and in-lieu fee requirements, remove related statutory language, exempt certain developments from school impact fees, raise the unit threshold for satisfying the land component to 100 units, require the School Facilities Authority to adopt rules and policies, and require a report to the Legislature on the effect of repealing the construction portion of the fee. The measure was also given a sunset date of June 30, 2029, with the committee report to note that the changes are intended to test the efficiency and efficacy of the fee structure and could be made permanent if the report supports that outcome. The committees adopted the recommendation, with one senator initially voting no and then changing to yes after the amendments were explained. The meeting also included a separate hearing on House Bill 1155, concerning procurement for Department of Transportation projects and construction manager/general contractor procurement. DOT testified that it supported the concept but wanted to narrow the bill, saying the current language was too broad and that the goal was to allow more innovative procurement while preserving selection safeguards. The State Procurement Office said it supported the bill’s language but was willing to work with DOT on alternative wording. Several construction-related organizations, including subcontractors, iron workers, elevator constructors, and building trades representatives, opposed the bill, arguing that exemptions from the procurement code would weaken protections such as retainage, equality, and prompt payment and could invite favoritism or corruption. In response to those concerns, the chair proposed amendments limiting the exemption to DOT, narrowing the qualifying contracts, adding a two-year sunset, requiring a report after the first year, and clarifying that project management could not be procured under the section. The amended recommendation passed, though several members voted with reservations. A separate item, House Bill 476, was briefly called up at the end of the agenda, with a recommendation to pass with amendments to increase a rate from 7.25% to 8%, but discussion was not completed in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our medical group is enhancing beneficiary health and community ties through several key initiatives.
• Our medical group is enhancing beneficiary health and community ties through several key initiatives.
• and provide higher QAD patients, improve beneficiary health coordination and provide higher QAD patient
• And as a public school official, I'm on the board in the capacity of representing the beneficiaries of
• Public schools is the largest beneficiary with, I think, this last fiscal year, about six.

Committee: Senate State Affairs

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• today the hearing is hearing testimony on finance, ethics, lobbying, labor, land, and honorary designations
• The child would access it starting at age 18, and up to age 35 the beneficiary must be a resident of
• must be a resident of Massachusetts Up to age 35, the beneficiary must be a resident of Massachusetts
• I am a retired General Motors design mid-level executive with an engineering and economics background
• Almost every design engineering company in Massachusetts.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee first heard testimony on a proposed Massachusetts baby bonds program, including H. 3429, S. 2146, and the Treasurer’s related bill H. 48. Treasurer Goldberg and a broad coalition of advocates, researchers, health professionals, and people with lived experience said the program would create trust accounts for children born into low-income families or in DCF custody, with funds available at age 18 for education, homeownership, business startup, or other long-term asset-building uses. Supporters argued the program would help close the racial wealth gap, improve economic mobility, and not affect eligibility for financial aid or public benefits. Committee members asked about administration, investment returns, eligibility, and withdrawal rules; the Treasurer said the accounts would be held in trust and managed by her office with an advisory board, with funds accessible at 18 and usable through age 35 if the beneficiary remains a Massachusetts resident. No vote was taken during the testimony shown. The committee also heard testimony on legislation establishing Lobular Breast Cancer Awareness Day, including S. 2666 and H. 4625. Senator Ross, Representative Badger, physicians, survivors, and advocates described invasive lobular carcinoma as difficult to detect because it often grows in lines rather than forming a lump, can be missed on mammography, and is underfunded and underrepresented in research and clinical trials. Witnesses said the bill would codify an annual October 15 proclamation to raise awareness, improve diagnosis, and encourage more targeted research and treatment. Committee members asked why the disease is so hard to detect, and medical witnesses explained the imaging challenges and the lack of lobular-specific protocols. The witnesses urged favorable reports. The committee then took testimony on H. 4648, a bill concerning the purchase or lease of Fenn Farm in Stockbridge by the Stockbridge-Munsee community. Representative Davis, the Stockbridge Land Trust president, and the tribal president testified that the bill would remove a conservation restriction tied to a state MVP grant so the tribe could manage the land without a restriction that they said would conflict with tribal sovereignty and Indigenous stewardship practices. They said the parcel is a sacred site connected to Monument Mountain and that the restriction is unnecessary because the land is already surrounded by conserved property. The witnesses asked for favorable action on the bill. Finally, the committee heard testimony on H. 3416, a resolution urging Congress to create a national infrastructure bank. Representative Senna and several advocates argued that an off-budget infrastructure bank could finance major repairs and upgrades to roads, bridges, rail, water systems, broadband, and housing without adding to the state budget, while creating jobs and supporting economic growth. Witnesses cited historical precedents for national infrastructure banks and said Massachusetts could benefit substantially from such a program. The transcript shown does not include a committee vote or final action on the resolution.