Transcript Highlights:

• type um the general assembly decided any type of<00:10:30.240><c> Medicaidc><00:10:30.720><c> related
• c><00:29:22.799><c> hadc><00:29:22.960><c> thec> type of things and never had the type of things
• typec><00:41:35.440><c> ofc><00:41:35.680><c> providerc><00:41:36.079><c> toc><00:41:36.319>
• c><00:41:37.040><c> Um,c><00:41:37.359><c> butc> which type of provider to hire.
• c><00:50:26.960><c> Soc><00:50:27.520><c> givenc> fraud type of a um a process.

Keywords: 00:00:00 - Call to Order/Roll Call 00:02:20 - Discussion of 26RS HB 689 00:13:13 - Discussion of 26RS SB 201 00:27:45 - Discussion of 26RS HB 583 00:46:37 - Discussion of 26RS HB 488 00:48:13 - Discussion of 26RS HB 2 01:14:34 - Discussion of Kentucky State Plan Amendment (SPA) 26:0001: School-based Medicaid Services Program 01:18:24 - Public Comment, 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight Board met on March 9 with a quorum present and no minutes to approve. The chair reordered the agenda to hear House Bill 689 first. Representative Amy Neighbors presented HB 689, which would authorize Kentucky to seek CMS approval for a Medicaid state-directed payment program for physician and non-physician professional services delivered through qualifying hospital-affiliated groups, beginning January 1, 2026, with retroactive payments for that year. She said the bill is intended to improve access to care in rural and underserved areas, support workforce retention, and generate about $29 million annually in federal Medicaid funds without using general fund dollars. Representatives from Owensboro Health and St. Elizabeth Healthcare testified in support, describing staffing and subsidy pressures, lower Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement, and the importance of the program for maintaining access and quality in rural and safety-net settings. Committee members noted the bill had already passed the House Health Services Committee unanimously and discussed broader concerns about Kentucky’s low reimbursement rates and the need to consider other systems not covered by the proposal. The board then heard Senate Bill 2011 from Senator Donald Douglas and Cody Hunt of the Kentucky Medical Association. The bill would address a Medicaid coding issue by ensuring that coverage limits do not reduce payment to fewer than two evaluation and management service units per provider, per patient, per day. Douglas argued the current one-visit, one-issue limitation forces multiple visits, increases no-shows, and prevents providers from treating the whole patient. Hunt explained that the bill is meant to correct a longstanding regulation that limited E&M services to one per physician per recipient per date of service, which can prevent providers from coding additional medically necessary work during the same visit. He said DMS has already filed a regulatory amendment to fix the problem, but a statutory change is still needed to prevent the issue from returning. He also said the bill is not intended to change reimbursement policy, only coding rules, and that MCO payment practices vary. Members generally supported the concept. Senator Berg asked about fiscal impact and private-payer billing; Hunt said there should be no fiscal impact because the bill does not change payment policy, only coding. Representative Moore said the proposal could reduce costs and improve convenience by avoiding extra visits. Chairman Meredith said the bill illustrated problems with fee-for-service care and supported moving toward a more holistic delivery model. Dr. Schuster raised a drafting concern about the bill summary language, and Hunt responded that the regulatory amendment should address the issue generally for providers. No votes were taken on either bill during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• :24:54.799><c> typec><00:24:55.120><c> ofc> external uh patient ombbudsman type of external uh patient
• ombbudsman type of uh<00:24:55.679><c> entitiesc><00:24:56.559><c> uc><00:24:56.720><c> willc>
• c><00:38:17.119><c> thesec><00:38:17.440><c> typesc><00:38:17.680><c> ofc> uh providers and we
• ><c> importsc> vehicular type of imports vehicular type of imports from<01:20:55.199><c> outsidec
• ><c> otherc><01:33:06.639><c> typesc><01:33:06.960><c> ofc> condominiums or or other types of condominiums

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several health-related measures, with most of the discussion focused on bills addressing tobacco/vape enforcement, psychology licensure, hospital price transparency, prior authorization, and medical cannabis. The chair opened by explaining the one-minute testimony limit and that written testimony had been reviewed. For SB 2175 on disposable electronic smoking devices, the Department of Health said the bill’s placement in litter-control law was not a good fit because disposable e-cigarettes contain hazardous materials like lithium and nicotine, but it supported the intent and pointed to a related measure. Public health and tobacco-control advocates strongly supported the bill, citing youth use, toxic waste, battery fires, and the need to tighten definitions and remove exemptions; a long list of organizations and individuals were noted in support, with no opposition mentioned. For SB 2410, which would create a state directory and enforcement tools for authorized e-cigarette products, the Attorney General’s office strongly supported the measure and said it would help enforce the FDA-authorized list of products through certification, inspections, and civil penalties. The Department of Health said thousands of illegal products remain on the market and cited youth usage rates, while public health groups also supported the bill. One tobacco industry-related witness was noted in opposition. SB 2080, the psychology interjurisdictional compact, drew support from the Department of Corrections, which said it had severe staffing shortages and that the compact would help fill gaps, especially for forensic psychology and neighbor island facilities. Some committee members raised concerns about whether the compact would loosen licensure standards and reduce licensing revenue, and the Board of Psychology was said to be meeting and had not taken a formal position; testimony also noted the need for resources if the compact were adopted. The committee also heard SB 2276 on surgical assistance, with DCCA in opposition and a supporter from the field, but little discussion followed. SB 2277 on hospital price transparency drew support from consumer and patient advocates, who argued that clearer pricing would reduce medical debt and help patients shop for care; DCCA and the Department of Health offered comments, with the department suggesting an alternative enforcement model using outside review entities and noting that implementation would require significant staffing and funding. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, saying federal transparency rules already cover the issue and state law could create duplication. SB 2282 on prior authorization received comments from insurers and providers; HMSA asked that the bill be set aside pending the report of the prior authorization working group created by Act 151, while the Hawaii Medical Association said prior authorization is a major burden but deferred to regulators on resources. Finally, SB 2413 on medical cannabis was supported by the Office of Medical Cannabis and others, who said the bill would close a patient-access gap by allowing viable seed sales; one witness suggested clarifying jurisdictional language and allowing dispensaries to sell seeds to each other. The committee then began SB 2425 on health insurance, where an addiction treatment provider testified that insurers’ refusal to honor assignment-of-benefits payments can delay reimbursement and create relapse risk for patients, but the transcript cuts off before further action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• :45.839><c> typesc> here that that specifies various types here that that specifies various types of
• c><01:15:18.239><c> typec> the federal law claims um 1983 1988 type the federal law claims um 1983
• :28.719><c> typesc><01:15:29.280><c> ofc><01:15:29.840><c> claimsc> are there are different types
• c> represent,c><01:33:05.360><c> doesc><01:33:05.600><c> thatc><01:33:05.840><c> typec><01:33
• ><c> thenc><02:02:47.199><c> settlements,c> of types of claims and then settlements, of types of

Bills: HB0068, HB0062, HB0127, HB0109

Keywords: veterans, property tax exemption, disabled, service-connected disability, Wyoming, governmental claims, liability limits, inflation adjustment, public safety, local government insurance, HB0127, recreation mill levy, recreational facilities, public recreation, mill levy, property tax, local tax, county commissioners, school district levy, voter approval

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> 48.8c><00:53:19.559><c> billionc> types with an estimated $ 48.8 billion types with an estimated
• :57.400><c> 16c><00:53:57.839><c> differentc><00:53:58.119><c> taxc><00:53:58.440><c> typesc>
• ><c> typesc> Revenue the 14 different tax types Revenue the 14 different tax types outside<00:54:14.319
• c><00:54:17.839><c> typesc><00:54:18.160><c> accountc><00:54:18.400><c> forc> individual income
• ><c> andc><00:54:28.680><c> alsoc><00:54:28.920><c> notec><00:54:29.280><c> allc> other tax types

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> twoc><00:25:19.600><c> uhc><00:25:19.679><c> thisc><00:25:19.919><c> wouldc> type two two
• c><00:31:42.720><c> Um,c> different types of building? Um, different types of building?
• c><00:31:48.240><c> Soc><00:31:48.399><c> anyc><00:31:48.640><c> anyc><00:31:48.960><c> type<
• <00:37:22.640><c> typec><00:37:22.800><c> ofc><00:37:23.040><c> use.
• ><00:37:27.359><c> usec> unusual type of use.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee began with routine business, including the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the minutes, seating of an alternate member, and approval of the consent agenda. It then took up Department of Health and Human Services Rule 25188 on New Hampshire Early Childhood and Out-of-School Time Credentials. Staff explained that the rule adopts two new parts to implement RSA 170E:50, which had long required rules. The main issue was an unclear comment created by changes in the department’s amended conditional approval request: language defining out-of-school-time basics and a requirement tied to the New Hampshire Professional Registry training transcript had been removed, creating a mismatch between the form and the rule text. The department said it revised the language so the form and rule now match. A member also asked about the fee schedule, and the department said the fees are sufficient and supported in part by federal funds. The committee then approved Rule 25188 as amended, with oral edits, on a voice vote. The committee next considered Department of Environmental Services Rule 25206, dealing with subsurface wastewater rules and an administrative fine schedule. Staff said most comments had been addressed, but one remaining issue concerned the fine schedule because the prior interim rule had expired years ago. Staff also noted public concerns about septic tank replacement sizes, but pointed to waiver provisions and replacement-in-kind language that would still allow smaller existing systems to be replaced under certain conditions. DES officials explained that the rule package adds the fine schedule into the program rules and that no fines have been brought under these expired provisions for many years. They also described the waiver and grandfathering provisions as intended to protect existing systems and seasonal campgrounds from unnecessary upgrades. A public witness, Christopher Albert, testified that two sections of the rule would harm manufactured home parks and cooperatives. He argued that the new “two people per bedroom” assumption and the minimum bedroom threshold for using water-meter data would inflate design flows, make water-meter data unusable, and increase costs for low-income residents. Committee members questioned both the witness and the agency about the assumptions. DES staff responded that the two-person-per-bedroom standard is meant for individual on-site system design, not citywide planning, and that water-meter data is only useful in larger or unusual facilities. They said the rule still allows flexibility through waivers and grandfathering for existing uses, and that the drinking-water rule cited by the witness was not the correct comparison. No final vote on Rule 25206 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• :26:38.400><c> typec><00:26:38.559><c> ofc><00:26:38.720><c> thing.
• c><00:26:40.559><c> itc> buck type of thing.
• :08.000><c> typesc><01:32:08.239><c> ofc> who are choosing between these types of who are choosing
• :17.840><c> typesc><01:32:18.159><c> ofc><01:32:18.320><c> benefitsc><01:32:18.719><c> arec>
• ><c> mayc><01:35:02.159><c> notc><01:35:02.320><c> bec><01:35:02.719><c> uhc> types of work that

Bills: HF3169, HF3749, HF2605, HF3541, HF4102, HF3513, HF268

Keywords: suicide prevention, transportation, mental health, bridge safety, data collection, state law, bridge inspection, active transportation, truck parking, public safety, vehicle registration, fee structure, full-service providers, Capitol security, emergency management, state buildings, law enforcement, Minnesota State Patrol, State Patrol compensation, trooper salary

Transcript Highlights:

• thatc><00:01:38.440><c> arec><00:01:38.600><c> inc><00:01:38.720><c> frontc><00:01:38.960><c
• c><00:29:50.880><c> workc><00:29:51.080><c> onc><00:29:51.200><c> thatc><00:29:51.400><c> type
• c> expenditures and and work on that type expenditures and and work on that type of<00:29:51.760><c
• ><c> ofc><00:36:23.800><c> thisc><00:36:23.960><c> typec> something an actuarial exam of this type
• something an actuarial exam of this type of<00:36:24.480><c> work.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee met on May 8, 2026, to narrow 12 proposed Legislative Audit Commission evaluation topics down to 8-10 semi-finalists for a legislative survey. Deputy Legislative Auditor Jodi Munson Rodriguez reviewed the selection criteria and explained which topics were promising now, which might be better deferred to fall because of timing or data limitations, and which were less promising because OLA would have limited ability to add value. She identified the Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy, DHS Adult Day Services Licensing, DHS county service approvals and provision, MDH mortuary science program, MPCA feedlot permitting, Minnesota paid leave, the Office of Cannabis Management, and several other DHS-related items as candidates, while recommending that DHS system modernization be shifted to an IT audit and that corporate concentration be narrowed substantially if pursued. Members discussed several topics in detail. Representative Lee asked how a broad DHS county services topic could be narrowed and suggested providing legislators with an addendum listing possible subprograms so they would know what they were ranking; Munson Rodriguez said OLA could add a few suggested subtopics and tailor the survey materials. Representative Hansen urged that the MPCA feedlot permitting review focus on effectiveness and environmental and health impacts, not just speed, and Munson Rodriguez said those kinds of questions could be added. The Office of Cannabis Management was viewed as promising but probably too new to evaluate immediately, and the MDH mortuary science program was also seen as worthwhile but potentially delayed because of overlap with other MDH licensing work. The Minnesota research tax credit drew the most extended discussion. Munson Rodriguez said it remained a weak fit for OLA because of limited data and unclear program goals, and Senator Rest argued it would be better handled by the Department of Revenue’s research staff or possibly the Legislative Budget Office’s tax expenditure research section. Representative Lee asked whether OLA’s financial audit division could review whether the credit “pays for itself,” but Munson Rodriguez said that would require econometric analysis outside the financial audit division’s normal work. The committee did not take a formal vote in the portion provided, but the chair indicated the tax credit issue should be brought to the full commission agenda, and the meeting continued with additional topic review, including the Attorney General Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, which staff said was heavily federally controlled and already reviewed by federal OIG, limiting OLA’s likely impact.

Transcript Highlights:

• types<00:35:28.920><c> ofc><00:35:29.040><c> licensesc><00:35:29.560><c> thatc><00:35:29.720><
• c> makesc><00:35:29.880><c> ac> types of licenses that makes a types of licenses that makes a difference
• :06:19.160><c> becausec><01:06:19.480><c> there'sc><01:06:19.720><c> ac> types that do allow um
• typesc><01:06:42.799><c> ofc><01:06:43.240><c> licensesc><01:06:44.240><c> forc> different types
• of licenses for different types of licenses for everything<01:06:45.119><c> fromc><01:06:45.319><c

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 14.519><c> typec><00:12:14.680><c> ofc><00:12:15.079><c> evidencec><00:12:16.480><c> umc><00:
• uh some type of uh can kind of get um uh some type of uh some<00:39:06.319><c> typec><00:39:06.480
• ><c> triedc><01:40:32.440><c> toc> same type of situation um and tried to same type of situation
• :59.359><c> thosec><03:35:59.600><c> typesc><03:35:59.800><c> ofc> may not have uh that type those
• types of may not have uh that type those types of resources<03:36:01.239><c> let'sc><03:36:01.600>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 146, which would require longer retention and quicker disclosure of certain video recordings from traffic stops and similar motor vehicle violations when a citation is disputed. The prime sponsor described the bill as a response to a constituent who challenged a speeding ticket but could not obtain a cruiser video before it was deleted under the current 30-day retention practice. Supporters argued the bill is about fairness and access to potentially exculpatory evidence, and one member suggested a simple 60-day retention period might avoid confusion over different timelines. The sponsor also noted that the bill would not affect criminal cases and that victims and complainants should have access to the same evidence as law enforcement when a recording is relevant to a defense. Major Brendan Davey of the New Hampshire State Police testified in opposition. He said the proposal would create a different discovery standard for one type of evidence, could discourage agencies from adopting body-worn or cruiser cameras, and would add cost and administrative burden. He explained that the State Police already retain routine traffic-stop videos for at least 30 days, but keep videos much longer when complaints or possible litigation are involved, and said the current system balances efficiency with accountability. He also argued the underlying speeding case did not make the trooper video directly material to the citation, though he acknowledged the legislature could choose a longer blanket retention period if it wished. No vote was taken during the hearing. The committee then opened a public hearing on House Bill 638, which would allow people serving life without parole sentences to become eligible for a parole hearing at age 60 after serving at least 18 years, provided they have had no major conduct violations in the prior 10 years. The sponsor said the bill is intended to give a narrow second look to a small number of elderly prisoners, citing the high cost of incarceration and the health challenges of aging in prison. He emphasized that the bill would not automatically release anyone, would not apply to capital murder convictions under RSA 630:1, and would still allow victims to participate in the parole process. Testimony on HB 638 was mixed. Alexander Bailey, a survivor of violent crime and domestic violence advocate, supported the bill, saying many survivors favor rehabilitation, second chances, and restorative justice, and that people in prison often age faster and face serious health and safety problems. Another supporter, Russell Roy, began offering a personal story about crime, addiction, and violence in Concord, but the transcript cuts off before his full remarks. Committee members asked about why age 60 was chosen, how released individuals would support themselves, and whether victims or families would be consulted; the sponsor said 60 was meant to limit eligibility and reflect the health realities of prison, and that parole boards already consider support networks and victim input. No action or vote was taken in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• of a certain<00:24:37.120><c> typec><00:24:37.520><c> comec><00:24:37.679><c> in,c><00:24:37.919
• ><c> we'llc><00:24:38.159><c> tryc><00:24:38.240><c> toc> certain type come in, we'll try to certain
• type come in, we'll try to adjust<00:24:38.720><c> thec><00:24:38.960><c> physicalc><00:24:39.360
• ><c> typesc><00:30:10.159><c> ofc> facility.
• That's those are the types of folks<00:30:10.640><c> thatc><00:30:11.760><c> requirec><00:30:12.159

Bills: SF0010, SF0005

Keywords: mental health, detention, competency evaluation, treatment, contractual agreements, bankruptcy, hospital, county, healthcare, financial stability, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:36:16.640><c> typec><00:36:16.960><c> ofc> it's be a first responder type of it's be a first
• ><c> typec><00:47:13.839><c> isc><00:47:14.319><c> onlyc><00:47:14.800><c> goingc><00:47:15.280
• c><00:49:22.880><c> typec> system where we already have plate type system where we already have plate
• ><c> type,c><00:49:59.200><c> butc><00:49:59.440><c> thatc><00:49:59.599><c> isc> change in plate
• ><c> onc><03:42:59.920><c> thatc><03:43:00.239><c> typec><03:43:00.399><c> ofc> bill have any

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:03:10.400><c> manyc><00:03:10.760><c> levelsc><00:03:11.519><c> orc><00:03:11.840><c> types
• c><00:03:12.239><c> ofc> actually is many levels or types of actually is many levels or types of
• :02.200><c> somec><01:08:02.600><c> typesc> some history already of doing some types some history
• already of doing some types of<01:08:03.240><c> thisc><01:08:03.440><c> typec><01:08:03.680><c>
• particularc><02:37:39.600><c> typec><02:37:39.840><c> ofc> wider for this particular type of wider

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> Identicalc><00:31:05.480><c> typesc><00:31:05.720><c> ofc> cases The Identical types of cases
• The Identical types of psychological<00:31:06.639><c> evaluationsc><00:31:07.240><c> asc><00:31:
• thisc><00:32:49.519><c> thec><00:32:49.679><c> typec><00:32:49.840><c> ofc><00:32:50.000><c>
• with shouldn't<00:32:53.480><c> differentiatec><00:32:54.240><c> thec><00:32:54.399><c> typec>
• <00:32:54.600><c> ofc> shouldn't differentiate the type of shouldn't differentiate the type of evaluations

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• uh set up what they call a procurement purchasing<00:04:23.040><c> typec><00:04:23.312><c> [clears
• c> purchasing type [clears throat] card. purchasing type [clears throat] card.
• a a uh<00:04:27.759><c> ac><00:04:28.240><c> uhc><00:04:28.880><c> debitc><00:04:29.199><c> type
• c><00:04:29.520><c> card,c><00:04:29.759><c> ac><00:04:29.919><c> creditc><00:04:30.160><c> type
• c> uh a uh debit type card, a credit type uh a uh debit type card, a credit type card.<00:04:30.720

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> thec><00:05:06.560><c> typec><00:05:06.720><c> ofc><00:05:06.880><c> vulturesc><00:05:07.520
• ><c> thatc><00:05:07.720><c> wentc> and and the type of vultures that went and and the type of vultures
• :14:08.399><c> somec><00:14:08.759><c> typec><00:14:09.160><c> ofc> important that we put in some
• type of important that we put in some type of rules<00:14:10.120><c> regulationsc><00:14:10.759><c
• :57.120><c> typec><00:15:57.319><c> ofc><00:15:57.600><c> topicc> committee meeting and this type

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met to hear a bill aimed at regulating paid veterans’ claims consultants and protecting veterans from bad actors. Chair Denine opened by emphasizing transparency, the need to hear concerns, and that the meeting was a hearing only, with no immediate vote expected. Senator David Yates, the sponsor, said the bill is intended to protect veterans by requiring clear written disclosure when a veteran uses a for-profit consultant, including that the consultant is not accredited or affiliated with VA or veterans’ service organizations. He said the proposal was based on best practices from other states, would include guardrails rather than a total ban, and was being slowed to allow further review and possible amendments. Testimony reflected both support for the bill’s intent and disagreement over its scope. A committee member and later witnesses stressed that veterans should be able to make informed choices and that some private consultants and law firms have helped veterans, but they also acknowledged bad actors and the need for rules, accreditation, and fee limits. James Toby of the VFW opposed the bill as written, arguing it conflicts with federal rules by allowing fees on initial claims and urging the committee to reject it in favor of legislation that mirrors federal law and imposes real penalties. Mark Christensen of Veterans Guardian said veterans need more options because Kentucky has too few VSO representatives, supported guardrails and accreditation reform, and suggested the bill could be improved with a dollar-based fee cap, no late fees or interest, and clearer ethical rules. Daryl Casey of JVO said his organization supports the bill’s goal of leveling the playing field, noting that veterans service organizations do not charge fees and that any limits should apply consistently across providers. The chair did not take a final vote during this hearing and instead encouraged the sponsor to circulate committee substitute language and continue discussions with veterans’ organizations and committee members before the next meeting. The sponsor said he was not pushing the bill forward that day and wanted more time to address concerns, especially around accreditation and disclosure.

Transcript Highlights:

• 18.480><c> favorc><00:10:18.800><c> ofc><00:10:19.120><c> anyc><00:10:19.440><c> typec><00:10
• of any type of rule that he in favor of any type of rule that he could<00:10:20.640><c> comec><00:
• 53.840><c> thatc><00:32:54.159><c> typec><00:32:54.320><c> ofc><00:32:54.480><c> behaviorc><00
• :32:54.960><c> inc><00:32:55.200><c> thisc><00:32:55.440><c> room,c> want that type of behavior
• in this room, want that type of behavior in this room, for<00:32:56.080><c> example.

Keywords: 916, all

Summary: The Rules Committee met to consider a proposed Senate Rule 15-9 prohibiting campaign contributions in Senate-controlled areas of the Capitol, prompted by concerns about lobbyists and others distributing checks to legislators while legislation is pending. The chair read a leadership statement condemning campaign contributions during session when donors’ interests are under consideration, saying such conduct creates at least the appearance of impropriety and undermines public trust. The initial draft would bar soliciting, offering, delivering, accepting, or receiving campaign contributions in Senate-controlled spaces such as the chamber, gallery, floor, corridors, lounge, lobby areas, and committee rooms. Senator Barlo raised concerns about defining the Senate’s authority and the scope of the prohibited areas, asking whether the rule would apply year-round, during interim meetings, or to online donations received while in the building. Other members responded that the Senate could only regulate areas under its control and that the rule should focus on the Capitol building itself, where fundraising should not occur. The chair noted that many other states have similar restrictions, and members discussed whether the rule should also cover campaign contributions during legislative session, not just inside the building. Senators Guru, Rothfus, and Biteman generally supported a stronger rule aimed at preventing vote buying and preserving the integrity of the institution, while acknowledging the need to refine language for enforcement and scope. The committee reviewed examples from Alaska and Wyoming’s constitutional bribery language, and staff and members proposed revised wording that would prohibit any person from knowingly soliciting, offering, delivering, accepting, or receiving campaign contributions in the state capital complex at any time, and separately prohibit senators from knowingly soliciting or knowingly accepting contributions by affirmative act during regular or special session. The discussion ended with no final vote taken, and members indicated they would continue working on the language with staff.

Transcript Highlights:

• type to operating subsidies by route type to estimate<00:03:22.400><c> thec><00:03:22.640><c> cost
• c><00:04:34.240><c> ac> type.
• ><c> differentc><00:04:35.360><c> typesc><00:04:35.680><c> ofc><00:04:35.840><c> routesc> listing
• > notc><00:04:52.160><c> comparingc><00:04:52.479><c> ac><00:04:52.639><c> corec> type.
• ><c> isc><00:09:47.519><c> anotherc> Changing the service type is another Changing the service type

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard a Met Council report from Charles Carlson on high-subsidy transit route analysis required by the transportation bill. Carlson explained that the study uses per-passenger operating subsidy, compares routes by type and service day, and is intended to help providers improve cost-effectiveness while recognizing transit’s importance for access, affordability, safety, and the region’s economy. He noted that routes more than 60% above peer averages are considered the highest-subsidy tier, and that the report also estimates the cost of Metro Mobility associated with those routes. Members asked several questions about why contracted service can cost less than directly operated service, whether contracting affects wages, union membership, or service quality, and why the Met Council targets about 20% of regular route service for contracting. Carlson said contracted service can be cheaper because of lower overhead and other market factors, that the council sets minimum wage and service-quality requirements in contracts, and that customers should not notice a quality difference. He also said the 20% target is meant to balance cost-effective service, geography, and a mix of providers, and that some routes may become more cost-effective with more frequent service depending on local demand. Carlson reported that in 2024, 206 of 264 routes met guidelines, 16 were in the lowest intervention tier, 14 in the middle tier, and 28 were in the highest-subsidy tier. He said the regional share of high-subsidy service was about 4.1%, but the share varied widely by provider, with some at 0% and others much higher. He estimated that discontinuing the highest-subsidy routes would save about $23 million annually and up to $72 million in capital costs. For Metro Mobility, he said the cost associated with trips tied to high-subsidy routes rose from about $368,000 in 2023 to about $6.1 million in 2024, largely because the mix of routes triggering federally mandated paratransit service changed, especially in the Shakopee area.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> isc><00:08:43.840><c> thatc> warranty type of claim, is that warranty type of claim, is that
• 00:21:42.800><c> ofc><00:21:42.960><c> somec><00:21:43.200><c> typec><00:21:43.600><c> orc><00
• ofc><00:30:46.040><c> thec><00:30:46.120><c> typec><00:30:46.400><c> ofc> Um, they are example
• of the type of Um, they are example of the type of people<00:30:46.760><c> thatc><00:30:46.920><c>
• c><00:31:05.880><c> typec> businesses there.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:05:04.720><c> typec> professional development, and other type professional development, and other
• type of<00:05:05.199><c> services.
• c> typec><00:22:15.120><c> ofc><00:22:15.360><c> responsec><00:22:16.080><c> didc><00:22:16.320
• 55.679><c> thisc><00:24:56.400><c> typec><00:24:56.640><c> ofc> how do other states handle this
• 04.000><c> likec><00:27:04.480><c> Andersonc> regional type training like Anderson regional type

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call: 00:22 Office of Education Accountability Report: Early Childhood Regional Training Centers (RTCs): 01:22 Approval of July 14, 2025 Minutes 31:21 Office of Education Accountability: 2025 Study Agenda 32:35 Adjournment: 39:12, 958, all

Summary: The subcommittee heard an Office of Education Accountability report on Kentucky’s early childhood regional training centers (RTCs). OEA said the centers provide valuable training, consultation, technical assistance, and materials for preschool personnel, especially for children with disabilities and at-risk students, and that the services align with state and federal requirements. However, the report found uneven student and teacher populations across regions, wide variation in per-student funding, some staffing data inaccuracies, and several fiscal oversight concerns, including inconsistent indirect cost rates, a building rental charge that may have been duplicative, and host districts recording RTC expenditures in a way that could blur them with district finances. OEA also said some documentation of progress toward goals was incomplete and that the technology lending library appeared underused. The report recommended stronger KDE oversight, uniform coding and accounting practices, review of budgets and expenditures, and an evaluation of whether the current five-center model remains the most efficient structure; OEA also suggested the General Assembly may wish to revisit KRS 157.318. Members asked about KDE’s response, whether the centers are required by federal law, how the centers operate, and whether changing the model would affect federal funding. OEA said KDE had only discussed the findings informally and had not issued a formal response, the centers are required by state law but not federal law, and changing the model would not jeopardize IDEA preschool funds. The committee accepted the report by motion. The subcommittee then approved the minutes from its July 14, 2025 meeting after initially delaying action because quorum was not yet present. After that, members turned to the Office of Education Accountability’s proposed 2026 study agenda. OEA said the three proposed topics are the annual district data profiles, facilities funding, and implementation of early literacy statutes. The district profiles would add an appendix showing the number and percentage of students moving to private school or homeschool by district and another appendix noting data-quality issues that affect comparability. OEA explained that district staffing data can undercount contract staff because those employees are not always entered into the system, and members expressed interest in tracking whether prior recommendations were implemented. One senator also raised a separate interest in reviewing whether KDE created and implemented regulations related to KFIX. The discussion remained informational, with no final vote on the study agenda shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• :48.120><c> loansc><00:02:48.560><c> typec><00:02:48.760><c> dealsc><00:02:49.080><c> wherec>
• installment loans type deals where installment loans type deals where people<00:02:49.400><c> arec
• > thosec><00:02:55.280><c> typesc><00:02:55.440><c> ofc> pay here car lots those types of pay here
• car lots those types of facilities<00:02:56.480><c> andc><00:02:56.560><c> theyc><00:02:56.680><
• <c> folksc><00:02:57.800><c> toc><00:02:57.920><c> doc><00:02:58.080><c> ac><00:02:58.280><c>

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00 Roll Call: 00:06 SB145 Discussion: 00:34 SB145 Vote: 03:05, 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present and took up Senate Bill 145, first adopting a committee substitute. Senator Givens explained that the bill addresses retail installment contracts under KRS Chapter 190 by adjusting the timing for collection/enforcement on past-due vehicle installment payments, with the substitute also aligning KRS Chapter 371 for non-vehicle retail installment contracts such as furniture and appliances. The substitute raises a fee from $10 to $15, a change described as updating an amount that had not been revised since 1996 and bringing the two chapters into alignment. Members discussed the bill in general terms, noting its relevance to weekly installment arrangements, buy-here-pay-here car lots, and consumer purchases of household goods. One member said the proposal made them somewhat nervous because of possible effects on consumers with low-value items, but stated there were no known concerns and that they trusted the sponsor’s judgment. No opposition was voiced during the roll call. The committee voted unanimously in favor of Senate Bill 145 as amended by the committee substitute, and the bill passed. After the vote, members thanked Senator Givens, and there was brief discussion that the bill had not yet reached the point of being ready for consent.