Video & Transcript Research : 'judgment evaluation'
Page 226 of 422
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- defendant's attendance at initial defendant's attendance at initial competency<00:14:08.279>
evaluation - <00:14:09.279>
and <00:14:09.600>at <00:14:09.839>any competency evaluation - and at any competency evaluation and at any treatment<00:14:11.000>
appointments. - ,<00:19:29.440>
supporting <00:19:29.840>them competency evaluations, supporting them - competency evaluations, supporting them with<00:19:30.240>
programming, <00:19:31.360>um,<
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on H.F. 2115 - Human Services Omnibus - Part 2 - 05/14/25
Transcript Highlights:
- that the House did not hear the bill, is that we have not had an opportunity to fully debate and evaluate
- He asked whether the witness did not have a chance to evaluate the position before, during, or after
- He asked whether the witness did not have a chance to evaluate the position before, during, or after
- So, did you not have a chance to evaluate<00:12:50.720>
this <00:12:51.120>position <00: - 12:51.519>
before, <00:12:52.079>during, evaluate this position before, during, evaluate
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/25
Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- We are also planning to conduct a survey of turkey hunters this summer to evaluate the impacts on turkey
- that they don't have to go through the process that I was describing earlier, where you get the evaluation
- that they don't have to go through the process that I was describing earlier, where you get the evaluation
- that they don't have to go through the process that I was describing earlier, where you get the evaluation
- that they don't have to go through the process that I was describing earlier, where you get the evaluation
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Oct 15th, 2025
Radioactive & Hazardous Materials Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- now, the Office of Management and Budget states that they're going to modify this standard to re-evaluate
- I'm telling you that's what we're thinking about doing and evaluating our legal options to move forward
- We're evaluating their proposal, and as I indicated before, we gave them extensive feedback.
- So let's evaluate what makes sense for us, not evaluate what— I think it's insightful, but not necessarily
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Science, Technology and Telecommunications Sep 23rd, 2025
Science, Technology & Telecommunications Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Another project that was funded by the New Mexico Healthy Soil Program. program evaluated the effects
- ongoing project funded by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture Specialty Crops Program. is evaluating
- Tucumcari is a small town, and Tucumcari has the infrastructure for the wastewater evaluations.
- I do believe they are evaluating just overall productivity if anything has changed since those turbines
- Darapanini actually has been on a project to evaluate prickly pear as a crop. for New Mexico, and I believe
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Health Committee Jul 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- We've been relying on limited progress reports that kind of use the same timestamp to be able to evaluate
- We've been relying on limited progress reports that kind of use the same timestamp to be able to evaluate
- Without reasonable and transparent evaluations, AI tools can risk reinforcing existing health disparities
- Each patient must make two oral requests, a written request signed by two witnesses, and be evaluated
- by two different A written request signed by two witnesses, and be evaluated by two different doctors
Summary:
The committee heard several health-related measures. SB 27 by Senator Umberg would revise and expand California’s CARE Court by limiting the expansion to people with bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, clarifying the definition of “clinically stabilized,” and narrowing the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Supporters, including behavioral health officials and family members, said the bill would reduce dismissals and better serve people with severe illness; opponents warned the expansion would strain county staffing and housing resources and could undermine voluntary engagement. The bill passed on a do pass motion to the Committee on Public Safety.
SB 503 by Senator Weber Pierson would require AI tools used in health care facilities to be identified, monitored, and mitigated for bias when used in clinical decision-making or resource allocation. The author and supporters from Kaiser Permanente and the California Medical Association said the bill would help prevent discriminatory outcomes and improve trust and safety. The committee discussed the need to clarify developer and deployer responsibilities, and the bill passed as amended to Privacy and Consumer Protection.
SB 68 by Senator Menjivar would require restaurants to provide written allergen information for the top nine food allergens, with tiered flexibility for smaller establishments. The bill was supported by patients, families, nurses, and allergy organizations, who described severe reactions and the difficulty of relying on verbal disclosures alone. The California Restaurant Association opposed unless amended, seeking broader use of the national model food code and additional liability language. The bill passed as amended to Appropriations. The committee also heard SB 403 by Senator Blakespear, which would remove the sunset from the End of Life Option Act; supporters described the law as a compassionate, well-functioning option for terminally ill patients, while faith-based groups opposed it. The bill passed to Judiciary. Later, SB 41 by Senator Wiener was introduced to rein in pharmacy benefit manager practices that steer patients to mail-order pharmacies and reimburse community pharmacies below cost; community pharmacists and several health organizations testified in support, describing pharmacy closures and patient access problems.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- understanding is it would bring inspectors to Hawaii who would go around the various restaurants and then evaluate
- restaurants would go around the various restaurants and<00:05:30.320>
then <00:05:30.560>evaluate - them<00:05:31.199>
and <00:05:31.360>then <00:05:31.600>assign and then evaluate - them and then assign and then evaluate them and then assign uh<00:05:32.720>
Michelin <00:05:33.199 - We are going to make an amendment to STR 61/SR46: change page 1, line 30, to say, “review, evaluate the
Summary:
The committee heard several resolutions focused on economic development, tourism, agriculture, and gaming. It first took up a measure to support advanced manufacturing and cybersecurity through the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, with testimony from DBEDT, HTDC, and APE Hawaii in support. Witnesses said the proposal aligns with federal and university partnerships, could help small and medium-sized businesses, and could support use of industrial sites such as the Mililani Technology Park. The committee then considered a resolution asking DBEDT to sponsor a Michelin Guide for restaurants statewide; testimony was mixed, with support for culinary recognition but concerns about cost and uncertainty over the return on investment. The committee amended that measure to require review and evaluation of the cost and benefit before sponsorship.
The committee also heard a resolution directing the Agribusiness Development Corporation to assume routine maintenance and repair of the Kohala ditch. ADC testified that it would need to meet with stakeholders, assess the damage, and likely spend the first year determining needed repairs before seeking additional capital funding; members noted a prior $10 million appropriation and asked that the committee report reflect a transfer of those funds to ADC. The measure was moved forward as is, with that comment for the report.
The most extensive discussion centered on a resolution to establish a tourism and gaming working group within DBEDT. Supporters included DBEDT, Aloha Halawa District Partners, labor representatives, the stadium authority, and Boyd Gaming, who described it as a first step to gather data and recommendations before any gaming policy decisions. Opponents argued the gaming industry should not help write the rules, warned about problem gambling and outside corporate influence, and urged the committee to reject the measure. The committee ultimately passed the resolution with an SD1 and technical amendments, and members said they would keep the issue open for further discussion, including possible inclusion of AHDP in the working group. The committee also heard and advanced a separate resolution urging the stadium authority to finalize the new Aloha Stadium contract and continue work on the entertainment district, with testimony both supporting the project and opposing it in favor of more housing. The committee voted to pass the stadium resolution as well.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
ECD Public Hearing - Fri Mar 21, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST
Economic Development & Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- a packed house this morning, is HCR 140 and HR 134, urging the Hawaii Sister State Committee to evaluate
- We evaluated it not through the sister-state committee but through DBED and the governor's office because
- <00:51:57.280>
We <00:51:57.520>evaluated <00:51:58.319>it So they approached - We evaluated it So they approached us.
- We evaluated it uh<00:52:00.000>
not <00:52:00.319>through <00:52:00.640>the <00:
Summary:
The committee heard several resolutions focused on economic development, tourism, technology, and related policy issues. Testimony generally came from state agencies and industry groups, with DBED, HTDC, and others mostly supporting measures that would create working groups, promote advanced manufacturing and cybersecurity, encourage a Michelin Guide for Hawaii restaurants, support Taiwan’s international participation, and explore import substitution. One measure on a tourism and gaming working group drew strong opposition from the prosecutor’s office, which argued it would signal support for gambling and could worsen social harms, while other witnesses supported it as a way to gather data before any policy decisions. The committee also heard support for relocating the Pearl City Post Office to improve traffic and safety, and for a resolution to focus HTDC on advanced manufacturing and cybersecurity.
Several items were amended before action. The committee agreed to amend the tourism and gaming working group resolution to narrow and clarify its purpose, and to amend the Taiwan resolution to add the president of the Republic of China as a recipient. The import-substitution resolution was also amended to add a definition, include language about avoiding new import dependencies such as LNG, and direct state and utility purchasing power toward substituting imports. A resolution on HCR 211/HR 203 was rewritten to address lowering fire insurance rates and mitigating fire risk in Puna lava zones, but decision-making on that item was deferred to a later hearing so the new language could be posted publicly.
The committee voted to adopt several measures, including HCR 57/HCR 152, HCR 156/HR 151, HCR 19/HR 115, and HCR 33/HR 32, with some passed as amended and others passed as is. HCR 192 was adopted with amendments despite reservations from some members, and HCR 209/HR 2011 was adopted with amendments. The committee also recessed for decision-making during the hearing and later adjourned after completing action on the agenda.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- review is necessary, uh, they would also be exempt from having to come every year and have that evaluation
- review is necessary, uh, they would also be exempt from having to come every year and have that evaluation
- having to come every year and have from having to come every year and have that<00:03:06.239>
evaluation - :07.920>
I <00:03:08.040>do <00:03:08.319>have <00:03:08.720>a that evaluation - U Mr chair I do have a that evaluation U Mr chair I do have a testifier<00:03:09.599>
with <00
Summary:
On February 3, 2025, the committee first took up Senate File 483, as amended by the A2 author’s amendment, which would expand Minnesota’s medical-review exemptions for drivers with a history of loss of consciousness or seizures. The bill’s author explained that current law still requires some people who have been seizure-free for years, and off medication for years, to keep returning to a physician for paperwork even when their doctor says no further review is needed. A testifier described losing his commercial driving career after a seizure disorder, then being forced to keep paying for periodic neurologist visits despite being seizure-free since 2003 and off medication since 2009. The committee adopted the A2 amendment and then approved the bill, sending Senate File 483 to the State Government Committee.
The committee then heard Senate File 737, which would increase mandatory minimum fines for repeated school bus stop-arm violations from $500 for a first offense to $700 for a second and $950 for a third. The author and the Minnesota School Bus Operators Association argued that repeat violations remain too common and that stronger penalties, along with stop-arm cameras, would help deter dangerous driving and protect children. A State Patrol representative said 2024 saw about 2,100 stop-arm charges, roughly double two years earlier, and attributed much of the increase to cameras making violations easier to prove; he also said conviction rates on the charge are about 50 to 55 percent. Committee members asked about repeat offenders, camera coverage, and whether bus stop locations should be safer, with one member noting only 23 people had been convicted of a second offense since 2015 and one of a third offense. The discussion ended with no final vote shown in the transcript, but the bill received supportive testimony and extensive questioning about enforcement and bus-stop safety.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Families and Children.(6-17-26)
Families & Children
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:07:09.480>
a <00:07:09.600>review <00:07:10.080>and <00:07:10.200>evaluation - made based on a review and evaluation made based on a review and evaluation from<00:07:11.200>
- Of course, schools are mandated to provide those special education evaluations, and we have seen eval
- <00:15:47.160>
at <00:15:47.440>UK, <00:15:48.280>at screening and evaluations- at UK, at screening and evaluations at UK, at Norton<00:15:48.840>
Children's, <00:15:50.040><
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Select Committee on Tribal Relations, June 15, 2026 - PM
Select Committee on Tribal Relations
Transcript Highlights:
- one of the ways that accountability goal is achieved is the requirement for an annual review and evaluation
- c> the<00:04:42.160>
implementation <00:04:42.720>of <00:04:42.960>the evaluation - <00:05:04.560>
excuse <00:05:04.880>me report which has an evaluation excuse me report - which has an evaluation excuse me an<00:05:06.000>
evaluation <00:05:06.639>summary <00 - summary as well as joint an evaluation summary as well as joint strategies<00:05:08.560>
and <
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- That's consistent with the current measure, where they are evaluating the public trust resources at that
- This working group shall evaluate and make recommendations regarding the governance and structure of
- <02:00:06.400>
and <02:00:06.520>make working group shall evaluate and make working - group shall evaluate and make recommendations<02:00:07.680>
regarding <02:00:08.160>the - Three, evaluate the need for independent counsel and dedicated executive leadership.
Keywords:
conservation, endangered species, wildlife preservation, native birds, biodiversity, sanctuary, nonprofit, DLNR, agricultural district, land use, chapter 195D, chapter 205, chapter 42F, state funding, public purpose, habitat restoration, predator-free sanctuary, ecosystem restoration, Zealandia, wildlife refuge
Summary:
The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit.
The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach.
The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Insurance products are created a year in advance and they're designed by actuaries who evaluate health
- Insurance products are created a year in advance and they're designed by actuaries who evaluate health
- Insurance products are created a year in advance and they're designed by actuaries who evaluate health
- Insurance products are created a year in advance and they're designed by actuaries who evaluate health
- Ultimately, this bill would allow credit unions like First Alliance to responsibly evaluate the best
Keywords:
travel insurance, regulation, insurance licensing, consumer protection, travel assistance, short-term rental, vacation rental, home sharing, rental marketplace, online platform, property damage guarantee, damage waiver, reimbursement insurance, insurance regulation, commerce department, platform user, Airbnb, Vrbo, host protection, rental home marketplace
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Committee on State and Local Government - 04/03/25
State and Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- 07:51.759>
be children aged seven and older must be children aged seven and older must be evaluated - Right now, OA has a program evaluation division and a financial audit division, and we have a special
- So, right now, OA has a<00:35:38.880>
program <00:35:39.119>evaluation <00:35:39.760> - evaluation division and a financial<00:35:40.960>
audit <00:35:41.359>division, <00:35: - Section three is regarding evaluations.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- We've hosted listening sessions throughout our community, conducted surveys, evaluated our enrollment
- <00:04:08.680>
our surveys we've we've evaluated our surveys we've we've evaluated our enrollment - , House or Senate authors, to be really clear about what their intent is so that we can properly evaluate
- , House or Senate authors, to be really clear about what their intent is so that we can properly evaluate
- <00:46:32.880>
the is so that we can properly evaluate the is so that we can properly evaluate
Keywords:
sales tax, education funding, construction, Aitkin Public Schools, tax exemption, refundable credit, HF148, use of force training, deadly force, peace officer training, police training, law enforcement, POST Board, Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training, scenario-based training, de-escalation, defensive tactics, force-on-force training, stress management, officer wellness
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25
Transportation Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- I think that is sometimes evaluated, but I would just say once a road is there, it's hard to get rid
- I think that is sometimes evaluated, but I would just say once a road is there, it's hard to get rid
- I think that is sometimes evaluated, but I would just say once a road is there, it's hard to get rid
- Anyone making that argument needs to re-evaluate their numbers.
- that argument they need to re-evaluate that argument they need to re-evaluate their<01:35:57.320
Keywords:
Northern Lights Express, NLX, Minneapolis-Duluth rail, passenger rail, intercity passenger rail, high-speed rail, Duluth, Minneapolis, MnDOT, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, transportation funding, rail appropriation, general fund, trunk highway fund, rail project cancellation, infrastructure spending, commercial driver training, CDL, financial assistance
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Health Services (3-6-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- called enm um billable<00:16:10.560>
Services <00:16:11.199>it's <00:16:11.480>evaluation - <00:16:12.079>
and billable Services it's evaluation and billable Services it's evaluation - This providing coverage for evaluation and management services for me, Layman, um, that seems wide open
- This providing coverage for evaluation and management services for me, Layman, um, that seems wide open
- the entire process and to evaluate the entire process and understand<00:35:38.760>
what <00:35
Keywords:
00:00:00 Call to Order/Roll Call
00:01:19 Discussion of 25RS HB 785
00:30:25 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HB 785
00:32:15 Discussion of 25RS HB 61
00:36:42 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HB 61
00:38:07 Discussion of 25RS HB 788
00:51:01 Discussion of 25RS SB 14
01:11:09 Discussion of 25RS HB 685
01:44:57 Adjournment, 958, all
Summary:
The House Standing Committee on Health Services met with a quorum and took up House Bill 785, as amended by a committee substitute that combined language from HB 785 and HB 787. The bill was described as addressing Medicaid managed care organization (MCO) audits, provider contract notice and amendment procedures, mental health parity compliance, and related transparency requirements. Supporters said the measure would tighten notice to providers, limit repeated contract amendments and rate reductions, require more standardized audit procedures, and add reporting on Medicaid claims, appeals, and grievances. It also includes a provision requiring coverage of at least two evaluation-and-management billable services per physician per recipient per date of service, and a section addressing narcotic/opioid treatment program licensing and reimbursement language.
Testimony in support came from Representative Kim Moore, John Inman of BrightView Health, Michelle Sandborne of the Children’s Alliance, and Kelly Cormic of RYSE. They argued that MCOs often use audits and recoupments in ways that are burdensome, opaque, and financially damaging to providers, especially smaller and rural ones. They cited examples of multiple audit requests in short timeframes, large record requests with short deadlines, delayed or absent feedback, and recoupments taken before appeals are resolved. They also said parity laws are not being consistently enforced and that the bill would give the Department of Insurance authority to suspend or revoke an MCO certificate of authority for willful or repeated parity violations. Committee members generally expressed support for provider protections and transparency, while asking for clarification on the narcotic treatment and E/M billing provisions.
Tom Stevens of the Kentucky Association of Health Plans testified in opposition, saying the bill is complex to implement and should be handled through the broader Medicaid oversight work of House Bill 9, the MOAB. He said the issues raised were better suited for that bipartisan stakeholder process and noted the committee substitute had not yet been fully reviewed by his group. After discussion, the committee adopted the committee substitute and then moved to a vote on the bill; the roll call began, with several members recorded as voting yes, but the transcript cuts off before the final vote result is shown.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Our board of trustees is pleased with the returns and our consultants when they come and evaluate, our
- independent consultants evaluate, they also say that our performance relative to everyone else in the
- Their new actuarial evaluation recommends them dropping that to 7.25%.
- I want to know where we're going and how our evaluation can be.
- I want to know where we're going and how our evaluation committees work.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:06:52.000>
criteria <00:06:52.440>for tomorrow um evaluative criteria for tomorrow - um evaluative criteria for considering<00:06:53.000>
tax <00:06:53.240>proposals <00:06 - This is just sort of different values that people use to talk about when evaluating tax proposals and
- evaluating a tax system.
- <01:25:23.080>
tax talk about um when evaluating tax talk about um when evaluating tax proposals
Summary:
The House Tax Committee met for an organizational and orientation session. Members and staff introduced themselves, with several lawmakers noting their districts, business backgrounds, and interest in tax policy. Chair Greg Davids then opened the committee’s first substantive item: a presentation from House Research and House Fiscal staff on how the committee works and on basic tax concepts.
House Research staff Sean Williams and Chris Clayman explained their roles in drafting bills and amendments, writing bill summaries, answering legal and policy questions, and modeling tax proposals. They also described the committee’s key documents, including partisan and nonpartisan bill summaries, revenue estimates, fiscal notes, and supporting materials. Their presentation covered core tax concepts such as tax bases, rates, deductions, exemptions, credits, tax revenues, and tax expenditures, emphasizing that tax expenditures function like spending through the tax code and are reviewed by a legislative commission.
The staff then reviewed Minnesota’s major taxes, focusing on the individual income tax and business taxation. They explained that Minnesota’s individual income tax starts with federal adjusted gross income, then applies state additions, deductions, subtractions, and credits, and that the state’s income tax brackets and rates are set separately from federal law. They also outlined the difference between corporate franchise taxes for C corporations and individual income tax treatment for pass-through entities, and discussed how the federal SALT cap led Minnesota and other states to adopt pass-through entity taxes so businesses could preserve federal deductibility of state taxes. Members asked questions about a duplicate “marriage penalty” entry on a slide, the purpose of Minnesota’s marriage penalty credit, comparisons with other states, and the timing and effect of the pass-through entity tax; staff answered that the duplicate was a mistake, the credit offsets bracket-related marriage penalties, and the pass-through entity tax was adopted in response to the federal SALT cap.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
ECD Info Briefing - Fri Jun 19, 2026 @ 1:00 PM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It's like, evaluate: do we need to do them again?
- So, I had my staff do an evaluation 10 years ago, whatever it was, and we gathered information from across
- So, we need to do that kind of evaluation, so that when it goes out into the public and the public always
- , need to do have that kind of evaluation, need to do have that kind of evaluation, so<00:49:10.120
- before it's ever uh and to be evaluated before it's ever ever<01:17:41.960>
released <01:17:42.360