Video & Transcript : 'depreciation schedule' :

Page 225 of 500
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities Jul 1st, 2026

Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please note that the schedule is subject to change and that elected officials may be called out of order
  • We took pictures to document and said if they're still there on Monday when he has his scheduled pediatrician
  • we took pictures to document and said if they're anything if if they're on Monday when he has his scheduled
  • long have you been doing it, how is it funded, how much does somebody get, on what basis, on what schedule
Bills: H5085 , H5286
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • must be heard by the multi-member board, an approach that supports transparency but often creates schedule
  • must be heard by the multi-member board, an approach that supports transparency but often creates schedule
  • must manage them through a system that relies largely on part-time board members meeting on limited schedules
  • As I testified, multi-members trying to get together with very complex schedules.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Combatting Antisemitism Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have, as you know, 15 minutes scheduled for you and then plus the Q&A, so my preference would be that
  • included a virtual roundtable called "Silencing Scholars: Academic Repression and Palestine" that was scheduled
  • included a virtual roundtable called silencing scholars, academic repression, and Palestine that was scheduled
  • to take place online before repression and Palestine that was scheduled to take place online before
Summary: The Special Commission on Anti-Semitism met for its 11th meeting and approved the minutes from its August 7 meeting. Co-chairs said the commission had recently completed preliminary K-12 recommendations and would continue work on higher education, with additional topics such as workplace issues, the medical sector, and the arts to be addressed before the November 30 reporting deadline. They also said another public comment meeting would be held this fall. The first testimony came from Dr. Mark Posnansky of Harvard Medical School, who described anti-Semitism affecting STEM, research, and higher education. He said Jewish and Israeli students and faculty reported ostracism, gaslighting, intimidation, discrimination, and hiding Jewish identity, and he urged clear leadership statements, mandatory anti-Semitism education, and stronger reporting and discipline procedures. Commissioners asked about Harvard training, spillover into teaching hospitals, and whether anti-Semitic climates were causing students to leave; he said some students had turned down opportunities because of the environment and that concerns also affected healthcare settings. Lindsey Gabbo, a Harvard Law student and mother, testified that campus discourse after October 7 had made Jewish and Zionist students feel isolated and unwelcome, with protests, defaced hostage posters, and a student council BDS vote contributing to the climate. She said Harvard had sent some emails acknowledging anti-Semitism but that she had not seen meaningful steps to restore dialogue, and she argued the school needed more structured venues for conversation. Commissioners also asked about campus security, the effect on students’ mental health, and the impact of chants and protests that she said many Jewish students understood as calls to violence. A panel of concerned Jewish faculty and staff then offered contrasting views. Professor Jeremy Menchick argued the commission should use data carefully, include non-Zionist Jews in its analysis, and avoid reinforcing divisions within the Jewish community. Professor Hilary Lustick described restorative-practice approaches and said structured dialogue could address conflict without immediate punishment. Professor Jonathan Feingold warned that anti-Semitism was being weaponized by the Trump administration and right-wing groups to attack universities and DEI, and he urged the commission not to adopt approaches that could be used to undermine civil rights institutions. Commissioners pushed back on claims that the problem was being exaggerated or reduced to a “problem” rather than a “crisis,” and the discussion ended with continued debate over data, context, and how to balance anti-Semitism concerns with broader civil-rights protections.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on the Judiciary Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • We've spoken with the District Attorneys Association, and I believe that we're scheduled to be in there
  • process, filed by Representative Lawn, Senator Collins, and Senator Olvera, and there are two panels scheduled
  • process, filed by Representative Lawn, Senator Collins, and Senator Olvera, and there are two panels scheduled
  • process, filed by Representative Lawn, Senator Collins, and Senator Olvera, and there are two panels scheduled
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on a wide range of criminal justice, victim services, and records-sealing bills. Early testimony focused on H.1811, the Clean Slate automated record-sealing bill, with supporters arguing that automatic sealing after existing waiting periods would remove barriers to jobs, housing, and education without changing eligibility rules. Advocates from legal aid, business, and housing organizations said the current petition-based system is underused, burdensome, and costly, while opponents of expanding surveillance-related laws urged the committee to preserve privacy protections. The committee also heard testimony on H.1693, which would immediately seal records in cases ending without conviction and clarify the presumption of innocence, with speakers describing how dismissed cases still create lasting collateral consequences and prevent people from moving forward. No votes were taken during the hearing. Several bills centered on victim safety and domestic violence. Senator Michael Moore testified for S.1201, which would keep child-protective orders in effect even if the parent or guardian who filed them dies, and for S.1204, which would update the wiretap statute. Multiple survivors and advocates supported S.1215 and S.1222, arguing for a narrow wiretap defense for recordings made to document threats or abuse and for making GPS tampering a separate felony offense. Testifiers described situations in which GPS devices were cut off or disabled and said current law leaves victims at risk and gives abusers too much leeway. The committee also heard emotional testimony on H.1685/S.1238, a bill prompted by the suicide of Stavri Yanka in custody, with the sponsor, his mother, and the sheriff describing the need for better information-sharing so suicide-risk information follows a person into custody. Law enforcement and prosecutors supported several due-process and dangerousness-related bills. MassCOP, the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association, and the State Police Association backed H.1828/S.1039/S.1235, which would require de novo Superior Court review for POST Commission suspensions over two weeks or decertifications, arguing officers need a meaningful appeal beyond administrative review. The committee also heard support for H.1691, expanding the dangerousness statute to additional offenses; Bristol County District Attorney Quinn said the changes would let prosecutors seek detention in serious cases such as child rape and manslaughter when facts warrant it. In contrast, the Committee for Public Counsel Services opposed expanding dangerousness detention, warning that pretrial detention causes serious harms and disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic defendants. The hearing also included testimony on H.1654/S.1063 to enhance victims’ rights and H.1525, which would rename and expand community corrections into community justice programs, with supporters emphasizing reentry, reduced stigma, and broader service access.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Health Care Financing Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Joint Committee on Health Care Financing

Transcript Highlights:
  • It was scheduled in March of 2023, but a few days before, we got a call that it was canceled.
  • And I know today was a little frustrating; the Senate and us, when we scheduled these hearings, didn't
  • And I know today was a little frustrating the Senate and us when we scheduled these hearings, didn't
  • know it's supplemental budget, and there's others, the Senate and us when we scheduled these hearings
Summary: The Joint Committee on Health Care Financing held a public hearing on 16 bills, with the chairs noting a busy legislative day and asking speakers to keep testimony brief. The committee first heard testimony on Senate 860/House 1405, the Medicare for All bill, with Sen. Jamie Eldridge and many advocates, clinicians, municipal officials, and patients arguing that a single-payer system would make care a right, reduce administrative waste, lower costs, and protect residents from rising premiums, medical debt, and hospital closures. Several speakers cited the Steward hospital crisis, affordability problems, and polling or ballot questions showing public support for single-payer coverage. No vote was taken during the hearing. The committee then took testimony on S. 863, a bill on non-opioid options for chronic pain. Pain specialists, patients, and advocates said the bill would improve care coordination for MassHealth members, expand access to non-opioid medications, require provider education, and collect data on chronic pain. Testifiers described long delays in diagnosis and treatment, stigma toward pain patients, and the need for multidisciplinary care and transportation support. Again, the committee heard testimony only and took no action. A large portion of the hearing focused on H. 1360/S. 869, which would prevent discrimination against people with disabilities in health care. Disability advocates, clinicians, and patients described being denied or delayed care, pressured into DNR orders, or treated based on assumptions about quality of life rather than medical facts. Speakers referenced COVID-era crisis standards of care, discriminatory metrics, and personal stories involving canceled procedures, inadequate accommodations, and poor treatment in hospitals. Committee members thanked speakers for their testimony and said they would review the bill and its implications, but no vote was announced. The committee also heard testimony on H. 1399, an individual Medicare marketplace option for municipal retirees, where supporters said it would give cities and towns a lower-cost alternative for retiree health benefits through HRAs and individual Medicare plans. The hearing then returned to Medicare for All testimony, with additional supporters repeating arguments about cost, access, municipal budget pressure, and the need for global budgeting and universal coverage. The transcript ends with continued testimony and no recorded committee vote or final action on any bill.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Committee on the Census Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:30 am

Senate Committee on the Census

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, we are running a little behind schedule, so I think we should wrap up at this stage unless any
  • We are running a little behind schedule.
  • listen I very much appreciate you you taking the time to be with us we are running a little behind schedule
  • I'd probably ask you more questions if I if we weren't but I We are running a little behind schedule
Summary: The Senate Committee on the Census held a hearing on September 22, 2025 focused on preparations for the 2030 census, with an emphasis on Massachusetts’ role in building a complete address list and improving local participation in census-related address review programs. Chair Brownsberger and witnesses from the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office, the UMass Donahue Institute, Watertown, and MassGIS described the importance of accurate address data for congressional apportionment, federal funding, and state and local planning. They also discussed the first major upcoming step, the Block Boundary Suggestion Project, and the later Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) process, both of which rely on municipalities reviewing and correcting census geography and address files. John Rosenberry of the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office said outreach to cities and towns is beginning now, with a likely December start for the block boundary process based on the 2020 cycle. He stressed that local officials, clerks, building inspectors, housing authorities, and GIS staff should be engaged early, especially to capture new development and conversions created under the state’s housing policies. Susan Strait of UMass Donahue explained that LUCA allows local governments to compare their address lists with the Census Bureau’s master address file, and that Massachusetts had very high participation in 2020; she cited examples where local review added hidden or newly built housing units and noted that Boston later corrected a group-quarters undercount of about 6,000 students through a post-census review program. In response to questions, she clarified that those corrections affected annual estimates and funding formulas, but not the 2020 apportionment count. Watertown City Manager George Proakis described how local address review is complicated by accessory dwelling units, single-family to two-family conversions, and large multifamily projects, and urged continued state support for local governments doing this work. Dan Marrier of MassGIS then outlined the Massachusetts Master Address Database, explaining that it combines multiple sources, including E911, assessor, voter, and municipal data, to create a standardized residential address repository used for census preparation and other state functions. He said the database has helped improve census accuracy, including by updating more than one million Census Bureau address-point locations before 2020, and noted that local municipalities remain the final authority on addresses even as MassGIS standardizes and reconciles variants across the Commonwealth.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Home health services: a nurse comes for a short scheduled visit, usually 15 to 16 minutes, to check a
  • comes for Home health services, a nurse comes for a<00:07:21.560><c> short</c><00:07:22.080><c> scheduled
  • visit,</c><00:07:23.040><c> usually</c><00:07:23.600><c> 15</c><00:07:24.120><c> to</c> a short scheduled
  • visit, usually 15 to a short scheduled visit, usually 15 to 16<00:07:24.680><c> minutes,</c><00:07:25.080
Summary: The committee heard public testimony on a health insurance/home care nursing provision and on other consumer protection items. Nick Keis and Emily Walters, both parents of medically complex children, testified that commercial health plans had recently begun capping home care nursing as if it were intermittent home health visits, which they said was contrary to Minnesota law and legislative intent dating to 2010. They described severe impacts on their families, including hospitalizations, loss of nursing coverage, strain on waiver budgets, and the risk of children being forced out of the home and into institutions. Representative Bierman echoed that the bill was a straightforward clarification of existing law, not a new mandate or added cost, and a staff member later cited the statutory definition of home care nursing as ongoing, continuous nursing services that cannot be met through intermittent or visit-based care. The committee also discussed the practical difference between home health visits and private duty/home care nursing, with testimony emphasizing that the latter is medically necessary, assessed, and not unlimited in practice. Laura Sales of the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office testified on changes to the Consumer Protection Restitution Fund (CIPRA). She said the fund has begun distributing restitution, starting with consumers harmed by the closure of Woodbury Dental Arts, but that current statutory language limits the office’s flexibility to prorate payments. She asked for an amendment allowing the AGO to distribute available funds more equitably so more eligible consumers can receive some payment, rather than requiring full payment to the oldest claims first. Annette Meeks, representing Citizens Against Gambling Expansion, testified in support of banning sweepstakes gambling in the Commerce Committee omnibus report. She argued that online sweepstakes casinos are an illegal gray-market form of gambling, cited rapid growth and billions in revenue, and said other states have acted through enforcement and legislation to stop them. She urged the committee to include language from Senate File 4474 to clarify state law and prohibit sweepstakes gambling. No votes were taken in the portion of the meeting shown; members mainly asked questions and received testimony.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Insurance Committee May 12th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • But still, it is very difficult for admitted... ...companies to adjust their rate schedules to what circumstances
  • . ...is a good start, but still it is very difficult for admitted companies to adjust their rate schedules
  • Chair, for scheduling this and getting us to wrap our arms around it.
  • Chair, for scheduling this and getting us to wrap our arms around.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Insurance held an information hearing on the impacts of climate change and catastrophic wildfire on California’s insurance market, with opening remarks focused on the state’s affordability, availability, and stability problems. Chair and members discussed the role of SB 254’s report, the Sustainable Insurance Strategy, the growth of the FAIR Plan, and the need to better align insurance regulation, mitigation, and land-use decisions. The Vice Chair noted the importance of hearing from industry as well as consumer and academic experts, and Senator Becker said the report would inform further committee work. Amy Bach of United Policyholders described how climate-driven wildfire and flood risk, combined with inflation, insurtech, and risk modeling, have reduced competition and pushed more homeowners into the FAIR Plan and non-admitted surplus lines coverage. She said availability is improving somewhat, but affordability will depend on mitigation, insurer competition, and fair rate regulation. In response to questions, she emphasized underinsurance as a long-running problem, supported stronger insurer responsibility for replacement-cost estimates, and suggested a public reinsurance backstop and more mitigation funding rather than removing wildfire coverage from basic policies. Nancy Watkins of Milliman and Michael Wara of Stanford argued that the market problem is fundamentally that expected claims and expenses now exceed premiums because too many homes are burning. They said California needs both risk reduction and actuarially sound pricing, along with a state mitigation framework that targets the highest-risk communities and prioritizes home hardening, defensible space, and community-scale mitigation over broad acreage-based spending. They also discussed the role of non-admitted carriers as a gap-filler, the need for better data on reconstruction costs and mitigation effectiveness, and the importance of sustained funding rather than one-time grants. A later panel with Frank Freebalt of Cal Poly and Michael Golnar of UC Berkeley focused on modeling and mitigation science. They said wildfire policy should treat the issue as a structure-ignition and urban conflagration problem, not just a wildland fire problem, and stressed integrated land-use, utility, and community mitigation. Members asked about zoning, building codes, utility hardening, and who should pay for mitigation; witnesses said older, denser neighborhoods are the highest priority, that utilities must improve operational safety measures, and that targeted mitigation in the highest-risk areas offers the best return. No votes or formal actions were taken at the hearing.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations May 11th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • provide for the House and Senate Committees on Governmental Affairs to meet and adopt rules and a schedule
  • We don't have the meeting schedule yet, though. So that's kind of why it's the way it is.
  • then would be meeting about in the, what we've called the off-season, to talk about that, to do the schedule
  • So the committees do meet, but that's on the off schedules. That's the days that I'm talking about.
Bills: HR3 , HR80 , HB4 , HB172 , HB189 , HB623 , HB944 , HB1185 , HB1199 , HB1222 , SB105 , SB125 , SB461
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Administration of Criminal Justice May 6th, 2026

Administration of Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • acknowledge that the decision to waive your jury trial right might be because you cannot then be scheduled
  • acknowledge that the decision to waive your jury trial right might be because you cannot then be scheduled
  • acknowledge that the decision to waive your jury trial right might be because you cannot then be scheduled
  • for several. to waive your jury trial right might be because you cannot then be scheduled for several
Bills: HCR50 , HB123 , HB219 , HB251 , HB404 , HB769 , HB1065 , SB58 , SB81 , SB92 , SB97 , SB141 , SB156 , SB181 , SB207 , SB396 , SB410
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development Committee Special Session 2026 May 5th, 2026

Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • All this amendment does is it replaces line 114 on page five with the following: The date scheduled for
  • The<00:37:36.960><c> date</c><00:37:37.320><c> scheduled</c><00:37:38.240><c> for</c><00:37:38.520><c
  • > the</c><00:37:38.640><c> 2026</c><00:37:39.600><c> general</c> The date scheduled for the 2026 general
  • The date scheduled for the 2026 general election,<00:37:41.120><c> F1.
Bills: SB1
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (04/16/2026)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • call of the chair for the purposes of introducing legislation, re-referring bills to committee, scheduling
  • :27:53.480><c> committee,</c> re-referring bills to committee, re-referring bills to committee, scheduling
  • <01:27:54.440><c> hearings,</c><01:27:54.880><c> sending</c><01:27:55.320><c> and</c> scheduling hearings
  • , sending and scheduling hearings, sending and receiving<01:27:56.040><c> messages,</c><01:27:57.160>
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Education Policy Committee Mar 11th, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Local boards retain full authority over scheduling and may adopt release time policies to meet local
  • 26.399><c> over</c> Local boards retain full authority over Local boards retain full authority over scheduling
  • 27.519><c> may</c><00:15:27.760><c> adopt</c><00:15:28.639><c> release</c><00:15:29.040><c> time</c> scheduling
  • and may adopt release time scheduling and may adopt release time policies<00:15:30.079><c> to</c><00
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Mar 10th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • To conform with the committee meeting schedule adopted by the House, yes, To conform with the committee
  • meeting schedule adopted by the House yesterday, we are updating the budget hearing schedule to move
  • The schedule is reasonable. If we need to phase things in, we're absolutely open to that.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 41 (3-6-26)

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • If sharing my story encourages even one Kentuckian to schedule a screening, then it is worth it.
  • one If sharing my story encourages even one Kentuckian Kentuckian Kentuckian to<00:51:44.480><c> schedule
  • ><c> screening,</c><00:51:45.640><c> then</c><00:51:45.800><c> it</c><00:51:45.920><c> is</c> to schedule
  • a screening, then it is to schedule a screening, then it is worth<00:51:46.360><c> it.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Department of Agriculture update 2/18/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have an additional 17 awards so far in fiscal year 26 that are closed or closing is scheduled, and
  • year 26 that are closed or or<00:14:24.240><c> closing</c><00:14:24.560><c> is</c><00:14:24.720><c> scheduled
  • > And</c><00:14:25.680><c> we</c><00:14:25.839><c> have</c><00:14:25.839><c> a</c> or closing is scheduled
  • And we have a or closing is scheduled.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (02/10/2026)

Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Going back to the schedule. >> Yes. So now we'll go back.
  • </c><00:12:40.079><c> back</c><00:12:40.240><c> to</c><00:12:40.399><c> the</c><00:12:40.560><c> schedule
  • Going back to the schedule. &gt;&gt; Okay. Going back to the schedule.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 9th, 2026

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • We'll schedule to meet that Wednesday before we end on Thursday at noon.
  • We'll schedule to meet that Wednesday before we end on Thursday at noon.
  • we did on Saturday, and couldn't have a meeting on Saturday, then the sponsors of this bill were scheduled
  • We do all realize that we sometimes meet out of our regular schedule.
Bills: HB99 , HB38 , HB165 , HB127 , HB72 , HB151 , SB40 , SB104 , SB136 , SB164
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 40, a committee substitute addressing automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and privacy. Sponsor Sen. Worth said the bill was intended to preserve ALPRs as a law-enforcement tool while adding guardrails to prevent sharing or selling data for immigration enforcement, protected health care activity, or criminalizing constitutionally protected conduct. Supporters included state and local law enforcement, the ACLU, immigrant-rights, reproductive-rights, and sexual-assault advocacy groups. Law enforcement witnesses said the bill balanced privacy with public safety and cited cases where ALPRs helped locate kidnapped children, murder suspects, and stolen vehicles; opponents and some senators argued the bill was too narrow, too focused on immigration and health care, and raised concerns about federal law, data sales, and enforcement. After debate, the committee adopted an amendment removing subsection F, then approved the committee substitute and advanced SB 40 on a do-pass motion. The committee then heard Senate Bill 104, which would create a process for removing wildlife commissioners after the 2023 wildlife commission legislation and the governor’s veto of the prior removal language. Sen. Worth explained that SB 104 would allow the governor to initiate removal for malfeasance, incompetence, or failure to attend meetings, with notice, a hearing, and exclusive review by the state Supreme Court; he said it was modeled on the Board of Regents removal process and was intended to complete the wildlife commission reforms. The New Mexico Wildlife Federation, Audubon Southwest, and the Department of Game and Fish supported the bill, saying it would depoliticize wildlife management and provide stability. Senators asked about the existing “three consecutive meetings” vacancy language, current vacancies, and the prior removal of a commissioner. The committee discussed the governor’s earlier veto and whether the bill was necessary, but no amendment was adopted and the committee approved SB 104 on a do-pass motion.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/02/2026 - House Health & Human Services

House Health & Human Services Committee of Reference

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, so looking at the schedule, the next three bills, we've got our whip, Madam Whip.
  • We had a third one scheduled; it was canceled, and we asked that it be rescheduled, but they have not
  • we have had two meetings during the interim the last few months on this bill we had a third one scheduled
  • I don't know if it was something with their scheduling and their docket or what it was, but there wasn't
Summary: The committee heard a JLBC presentation on H.R. 1’s SNAP impacts, including expanded work requirements, higher state administrative costs, and a potential state share of benefits if Arizona’s payment error rate remains above 6%. JLBC estimated the administrative cost increase at about $33 million in FY 2027 and $44 million in FY 2028, and said a 2024 error rate of 8.8% could expose the state to about $139 million in benefit costs starting in FY 2028. The chair also opened the meeting by asking members and speakers to keep remarks shorter to improve efficiency. The committee then considered several SNAP-related bills. HB 2797, which requires DES to more frequently verify eligibility through data matching, post fraud/noncompliance data, and address out-of-state EBT purchases, passed 7-5. HB 2442, requiring certain able-bodied SNAP adults with school-age children to participate in employment and training unless exempt, also passed 7-5. HB 2448, which limits DES’s ability to seek work-requirement waivers or discretionary exemptions without legislative authorization, passed 7-5. HB 2206, which sets a goal of reducing the SNAP payment error rate to 3% by 2030 and adds reporting and corrective-action requirements, passed 7-5 after debate over staffing, technology, and whether the target was realistic. The committee also advanced HB 2180, appropriating $2.5 million to the University of Arizona for AZ REACH, a hospital transfer coordination program serving rural facilities. Supporters said it improves patient transfers and reduces burdens on rural hospitals; some health system representatives were neutral but asked for operational improvements. HB 2180 passed 11-1. HB 2184, as amended, passed 7-4-1; it would extend fetal death certificate filing and require patients to be informed of the option to transfer fetal remains to a funeral home, with supporters describing it as a matter of parental dignity and closure. HB 2188, as amended, creating a Language Acquisition Grant Program for deaf or hard-of-hearing infants and toddlers, passed unanimously after testimony about balancing spoken-language and ASL options. The committee then began hearing HB 2194, a bill requiring insurers to provide a contact for detailed explanations after claim or prior-authorization denials, but the transcript ends before action on that bill.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/02/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, so looking at the schedule, the next three bills, we've got our whip, Madam Whip.
  • We had a third one scheduled; it was canceled, and asked that we rescheduled, but have not come back
  • We had a third one scheduled; it was canceled, and we asked that it be rescheduled, but have not come
  • I don't know if it was something with their scheduling and their docket or what it was, but there wasn't