Transcript Highlights:

• I’m the founder of State Armor.
• Section 14 ensures that products with these built-in features are not purchased with state funds or deployed
• or the United States.
• or the United States.
• and of the state of Florida.

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard a long agenda of bills, beginning with several probate, civil rights, and claims measures. Senators Burgess’s SB 326 on curators of estates was explained as a modernization of probate law; an amendment narrowing the bill was adopted, and the committee reported the bill favorably 10-0 after limited public testimony, including opposition from Ray Contreras. Burgess’s SB 1096, clarifying filing deadlines under the Florida Civil Rights Act, also passed unanimously 11-0. The committee then approved several claims bills, including SB 28 for Reginald Jackson against the City of Lakeland, SB 6 for a child injured after DCF’s handling of abuse allegations, SB 18 for the estate of McKenzie Navarre against the Broward County Sheriff’s Office, SB 26 for the estate of Mark Legata against FDOT, and SB 2 for the estate of Daniel Maudsley against DHSMV, with votes ranging from 10-1 to 11-0 and mostly no debate or opposition. The committee also took up trust and family-law related bills. Leader Berman’s SB 786 created a nonjudicial process for closing uncontested trusts and discharging trustees; after a technical amendment and testimony from Ray Contreras raising notice concerns, it passed 11-0. President Gates’s SB 50 expanded veterans’ courts statewide, drew broad support from veterans’ groups and advocacy organizations, and was reported favorably 11-0. Senator Simon’s SB 538 standardized extracurricular participation rules for public, private, virtual, and homeschool students; after multiple amendments on homeschool eligibility, fees, and coach compensation, it passed 11-0 with support and opposition from education-related groups. President Gates’s SB 1004, aimed at consumer protections in the sale of dogs and cats, also passed unanimously after testimony from humane organizations. The committee then considered broader policy bills. President Pro Tem Brodeur’s SB 1366 on claims against the government proposed raising sovereign immunity caps and adding CPI adjustments; local government, hospital, and school representatives supported the Senate’s lower-cap approach while warning against the House version, and the bill was reported favorably 11-0. Senator Jones’s SB 178 on athletics in public K-12 schools, as amended, would let head coaches provide limited personal support to student-athletes and require reporting of assistance; it passed 10-0. Senator Grohl’s SB 1178 on foreign influence and foreign countries of concern drew extensive supportive testimony from national security witnesses and was reported favorably 11-0 after a technical amendment and withdrawal of another amendment. Finally, SB 1632 on ideologies inconsistent with American principles prompted substantial debate and public testimony over domestic terrorism designations, Sharia law references, due process, and free speech concerns; the committee had not yet completed final action on that bill when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• THEY WON'T BE OUT PURCHASING A GUN. THAT'S WHAT THE MILITARY DOES. ULTIMATELY.
• THE IDEA OF GRANTING THEM AN EXEMPTION, IT ALREADY EXISTS UNDER STATE LAW FOR EVERYONE.
• THE VOTE AND CARRY LEGISLATION AND REPEAL OF UNDER 21 PURCHASE.
• HIGHWAY PATROL PURCHASES OUR WEAPONS.
• TO PURCHASE A FIREARM BECAUSE OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE BILL ULTIMATELY CUTTING TO THE CHASE.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I am Director of State Regulatory Affairs for Clean Fuels Alliance America, and I'm here to testify in
• is a carbon state.
• is a carbon state.
• EVs sold in the state.
• A couple of those states, Washington State, Oregon, have always done reasonably well, sort of like California

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy heard testimony on several transportation and clean-fuel bills. Supporters of H. 3535 argued for delaying or pausing enforcement of Massachusetts’ zero-emission vehicle sales mandate, saying the current ACC2 timeline is unrealistic given low ZEV sales, limited charging infrastructure, dealer inventory concerns, and potential economic impacts on dealerships, consumers, and tax revenue. Opponents of that approach, including automakers and clean transportation advocates, said the state should stay on course with electrification and that the mandate is necessary to meet climate goals. The committee also heard support for H. 3570/S. 2326 to update vehicle emission standards for municipal and utility fleets, with municipal utility representatives saying current electric truck technology, charging access, and costs make the rules impractical for critical public services. A major portion of the hearing focused on S. 2246, the Freedom to Move Act, which would require MassDOT and regional planning agencies to set vehicle miles traveled reduction goals and align transportation spending with climate targets. Supporters said the bill would better coordinate transportation planning, encourage transit, biking, and walking, and help Massachusetts meet emissions goals while saving money and improving public health. Some committee members raised concerns that the bill could duplicate existing transportation climate mandates and could disadvantage rural residents who must drive long distances; witnesses responded that the bill is meant to add coordination and flexibility, not impose a one-size-fits-all solution. The committee also heard testimony on H. 3448, which would set deadlines to electrify school buses and public fleets and create programs for private fleet electrification. Advocates said fleet electrification is a practical way to cut emissions, improve air quality, and save money over time, especially for schoolchildren exposed to diesel exhaust. Several witnesses also supported low-carbon fuel standard bills H. 3576 and S. 2251, arguing they would reduce fuel carbon intensity and generate revenue for charging and clean-fuel investments. Others, including a coalition opposed to private jet expansion, objected to the bills’ treatment of sustainable aviation fuel, saying it is not scalable, is expensive, and could create land-use and food-supply tradeoffs. No votes or formal committee actions were taken in the hearing excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Let's make sure that Florida joins the majority of states, and we are one of the top solar states in
• Other states don't operate that way, but we do.
• , because our state looks a little different.
• Affordability is in the statute in other states, not just Vermont, but other states, and it can be defined
• We can't be like some of those other states.

Summary: The Committee on Regulated Industries met with a quorum and took up four bills. SB 288 on rural electric cooperatives was presented as a negotiated glitch bill to narrow statutory language so co-ops can choose generation and power purchases based on cost and reliability without exposure to special-interest litigation, while preserving consumer protections. A representative from the Florida Electric Cooperatives Association waived in support, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee then considered SB 364 on public accountancy, which was described as a modernization and efficiency measure to expand CPA licensure pathways without lowering standards. An amendment correcting a drafting error and restoring automatic mobility language was adopted without objection. Jason Harrell of FICPA waived in support, while one speaker appeared to discuss a utility issue unrelated to the bill. CS for SB 364 was reported favorably. Chair Bradley’s SB 200 on utilities addressed utility-scale solar decommissioning and storm protection plans. The bill would authorize counties to adopt solar decommissioning ordinances, direct DEP to develop best practices, and require the PSC to consider whether storm protection plan benefits exceed costs. County and AARP representatives waived in support, and the Small County Coalition spoke favorably, saying the bill was a needed step that did not restrict solar development. SB 200 was considered favorably. The committee also heard SB 126 on the Florida Public Service Commission, a strike-all bill focused on PSC reform and utility affordability. The amendment would add CPA and financial analyst expertise, require stronger PSC order support, tighten intervention standards, set return-on-equity and review criteria, require consideration of executive compensation and affordability, and direct the PSC to weigh risk from storm and cost-recovery mechanisms. PSC staff answered extensive questions about utility hardening, storm recovery, and rate-setting. Supporters said the bill would improve accountability and affordability, while others urged stronger enforceable affordability standards and restoration of the return-on-equity cap. Despite concerns, the bill was reported favorably as CS for SB 126.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a held by the state treasurer.
• federal level and this at the state federal level and this at the state level.<00:13:43.279>
• enter into a purchase power agreement. enter into a purchase power agreement.
• We need help from the state.
• We need help from the state.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And over 48% of lots that were purchased at the time that they did this study last year had been purchased
• State Farm should be ashamed of themselves.
• And I think, you know, as a state, we need to kind of come together on.
• We have Justine Marcus, state and local policy director with Enterprise Community Partners, and Purva
• We have Justine Marcus, state and local policy director with Enterprise Community Partners, and Purva

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We've seen the purchase of a hotel and even the purchase of an equestrian center.
• So state agencies and Texas universities that receive state funds must justify their budgets to you,
• which dwarfs every state university and all but the largest state agencies.
• Other states have established frameworks authorizing AVs.
• My name is Elizabeth Fishbach, and I'm the director of state and local affairs for STAC AB.

Transcript Highlights:

• In addition, we operate state psychiatric hospitals and state-supported living centers.
• I am the Chief Medicaid and SHIP Services Officer and state Medicaid Director.
• We also look at out of state shopping, um, for SNAP purchases, and then that will trigger alerts that
• things out of state.
• We have commissioned peace officers who work in our state-supported living centers and state hospitals

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the Deputy Budget Director of the State Budget Division at DFA.
• Moving on to page 11, you can see the Office of the State Engineer, or sorry, no. the Office of the State
• We're in the first third of states.
• State Auditor. Let's hear about...
• But I will state that these two aren't mutually exclusive, but many state agency deficiency requests

Transcript Highlights:

• state.
• I am Tyler Yorth, the Director of Utilities for the City of San Marcos.
• IOUs provide a vital service to the state of Texas when purchasing small utilities.
• Even me, as a state legislator for 14 years...
• And my concern is that, as a state, we've created a system that 100%...

Bills: HB29, HB685, HB1633, HB1689, HB1690, HB1918, HB2010, HB2500, HB2608, HB2626, HB29

Keywords: water audit, water loss, water loss mitigation plan, municipally owned utility, municipal utility, water conservation, Texas Water Development Board, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water leakage, leak detection, billing data accuracy, utility validation, water audit validation, water scarcity, water management, infrastructure, public utility, conservation plan, administrative penalty

Transcript Highlights:

• :10:22.880> New center director in Claremont, New center director in Claremont, New Hampshire.
• <01:09:54.320> Benjamin homicide by the state. Okay. Benjamin homicide by the state.
• There's no state >> Not in New Hampshire. There's no state law. law. law.
• States.
• one of the safest states in the union. one of the safest states in the union.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• been purchasing from Canada.
• highlight Mr Meyer a moment ago stated highlight Mr Meyer a moment ago stated that<00:21:15.159>
• <00:21:36.559> for there been the demand in our state for there been the demand in our state
• <01:09:12.480> is agriculture industry as the state is agriculture industry as the state is
• <01:24:21.400> here amounts of water that are stated here amounts of water that are stated

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Other states, as a response to increasing or addressing the needs in their states, have done so.
• And while this isn't a standard application across all states, each state is looking at the unique needs
• Other states as a response to increasing or addressing the needs in their states have done so.
• Often the purchasers of these drugs have no intention of purchasing fentanyl, but when purchasing drugs
• Why are we not stating that this is the standard up and down the state? Yeah, yeah.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Human Services Committee met with a quorum and first adopted a 4-0 consent calendar for SB 1345, SB 1410, and SB 1421. The committee then heard SB 1200 on child care, which would redefine infant and toddler age categories so providers could serve 18- to 24-month-olds in toddler slots. The author and family child care providers said the bill would better align policy with child development, improve reimbursement, and help providers stay open; there was no opposition. SB 1200 passed 4-0 to Appropriations. The committee also approved SB 971, which would authorize counties to offer optional adult education and technology training programs for older adults through local public health systems and community partners. Supporters said it would help seniors with digital literacy, fraud awareness, health, and social connection, while remaining locally flexible and non-mandatory. The bill passed 4-0 to the floor. SB 1234, the “Accountability Before Custody Act,” would require fentanyl to be included in drug testing already ordered in dependency cases. The author, an angel family member, and a sheriff’s office representative described child deaths and exposure risks tied to fentanyl; the bill passed 4-0 to the floor. The committee then heard SB 1109, which would require additional state review for short-term residential therapeutic programs with repeated serious citations or located in very small rural counties lacking basic infrastructure. Supporters from Alpine County said the bill addresses a mismatch between facility placement and local capacity; opponents argued it was overly broad and could reduce placement capacity. The author accepted committee amendments, and the bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations as amended. SB 961, the Student Food Access Act, would notify financial aid applicants that they may also be eligible for CalFresh; students and advocacy groups supported it, and it passed 4-0 to Appropriations. SB 1099, clarifying local governments’ authority to provide public benefits to all residents under PRWORA-related exemptions, also passed 4-0 to the floor and was kept on call. Later, the committee heard SB 1190, the Safe Passage for Youth Act, which would create licensing and safety rules for companies transporting youth to out-of-state residential facilities. Survivors described being taken from their homes in frightening and coercive circumstances, and supporters said the industry is currently unregulated; the bill passed 4-0 to the Public Safety Committee. Finally, SB 1325 would create a limited pathway for Feeding San Diego to participate in CalFood under added conditions. Supporters said it would expand hunger relief in San Diego County, while food bank organizations opposed it, warning it would divert limited resources and set a precedent. The discussion highlighted broader concerns about CalFood funding and food bank capacity, but no final vote on SB 1325 was shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• It prohibits the state protocol officer, the Secretary of State, from encouraging a sister city or sister
• state affiliation.
• states to help them build out state solutions to national security problems.
• Similarly, Section 10 bars state contracting related to the state.
• Lastly, Section 14 prohibits the use of state funds to purchase or deploy surveillance or security cameras

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 1178, the Foreign Interference Restriction and Enforcement Act. Senator Grohl explained that the bill expands state restrictions and disclosure requirements related to foreign countries of concern and designated foreign terrorist organizations, including foreign-agent registration, gift bans for public officials, ethics training, procurement limits for IT and critical infrastructure, restrictions on sister-city/sister-state affiliations, changes to linkage institutes and in-state tuition provisions, and new criminal penalties for certain offenses committed to benefit foreign governments or terrorist organizations. Senator Polsky raised questions about higher education, election technology, federal FARA overlap, and whether the bill would affect candidates or events involving CARE; the sponsor responded that the bill focuses on foreign countries of concern, ownership/control, and gifts, and does not prohibit speaking at events. An amendment clarifying definitions, willful violations, and ethics-training content was adopted, and after supportive testimony from Kelly Curry and Robert Pierce, the committee reported CS for SB 1178 favorably. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1622, which provides a one-time waiver of the automatic fine for a late-filed financial disclosure if the filing is made before the maximum fine accrues and the filer has not previously received such a waiver or accrued the maximum fine in prior years. Carrie Stillman of the Commission on Ethics testified that the bill supports transparency and makes the fine and appeals process more efficient, noting it was a commission recommendation. The bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee held confirmation hearings on appointments in Tabs 3 through 26. No senator requested separate votes on any appointee, no public testimony was offered, and the block of appointments was approved and recommended favorably to the full Senate.

Transcript Highlights:

• >> the Constitution of the United States >> the Constitution of the United States >
• >> of the State of Havi. >> of the State of Havi.
• >> of the State of Hawaii. >> of the State of Hawaii.
• Uh, our state fire marshal, stand. Uh, our state fire marshal, Dorothy<00:42:50.960> Booth.
• please welcome them to their state please welcome them to their state capital?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• other states.
• c><01:08:36.000> God<01:08:36.199> forbid state to other states or God forbid state to
• their purchases in... ...taking away from in-state residents.
• where people from out of state come here to purchase cigarettes, and you've heard a lot of testimony
• I believe the state has because those individuals are serving the entire state.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The public hearing focused on HB 290, which would raise cigarette and e-cigarette/vaping taxes and create a committee to study tobacco and nicotine tax policy. Representative Jerry Stringham introduced the bill as both a public health and revenue measure, arguing that nicotine use causes health harms and public costs, and that New Hampshire’s cigarette tax has been unchanged at $1.78 per pack since 2013. He said the bill would raise the cigarette tax by $1 per pack to $2.78, still below most New England states, and would also adjust vaping taxes, which he described as having been set as placeholder rates in 2019. He said the bill would also establish a study committee to review broader tobacco and nicotine taxation, including products such as premium cigars. In response to questions, Stringham said the proposed cigarette tax would be roughly equal in real dollars to the 2008 rate after inflation, and he suggested that a smaller annual increase could be considered, though he believed a larger increase would have a stronger public health effect. He explained that the vaping tax structure differs between closed and open systems because one taxes a fixed hardware product while the other taxes reusable liquid, and he said the proposal would move the rates toward a more uniform approach. He also said New Hampshire would remain below neighboring states even after the increase, though members raised concerns about cross-border shopping, business impacts, and preserving the state’s competitive advantage. Several members questioned whether the bill’s main purpose was revenue or reducing smoking and vaping. Stringham said he viewed it primarily as a public health bill, but also as a revenue measure, and said he would consider it successful even if consumption fell enough to reduce revenue. Other members emphasized personal freedom and argued the committee should focus on taxation rather than cessation, while some supported the bill as a way to capture revenue from out-of-state buyers and keep New Hampshire’s rates below surrounding states. The hearing consisted of testimony and questions only; no vote or final action was taken in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you live in a private home right now and you need to purchase home care, you have to purchase minimum
• The third concern is requiring resident representation on boards of directors.
• So we just want to state that as we're going along. Thank you, Jim.
• So the state of Washington does this, I think, and I can send the link.
• The other two were out of state.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission meeting focused on continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), beginning with a presentation from Two Life Communities on its Opus Newton model, which is opening in the fall. Two Life described Opus as a middle-income, modern CCRC built around affordability, care coordination in residents’ apartments rather than separate care buildings, and resident-driven community life. Commissioners asked about financing, home care arrangements, affordability, Medicaid/MassHealth access, and the role of resident councils versus board representation. Two Life said it wants to remain within the CCRC framework, but expressed concern about proposals that would require multiple discrete care levels, impose deadlines on entrance-fee refunds, or require resident board seats. The commission then discussed possible recommendations. There was broad support for Senate Bill 478, which would require clearer disclosure of entrance-fee refund terms in a separate document for prospective residents. On refund timing, members were divided: some favored a one-year deadline or a deadline with waivers, while others opposed a fixed deadline because of financing risks and the potential impact on new development and current residents. Several members suggested keeping the status quo but adding better data collection and reporting on refund timing. On the CCRC definition and marketing, members debated whether the current statutory definition is too vague and whether the commission should recommend clearer standards or a certification-like process, while also noting resource limits for state oversight. Members also discussed the Age CCRC Consumer Guide, with general agreement that it should be updated and made more useful to consumers, possibly with clearer questions to ask and more information about facilities, though some cautioned against adding subjective financial-risk statements that would be hard to administer. On resident representation, several commissioners strongly supported requiring resident voting members on boards, while providers argued that strong resident associations and regular meetings with boards may be preferable and that communities should retain flexibility. The meeting ended with a request for written comments by July 11, draft recommendations to be circulated July 18, and a possible final meeting on July 21, with the commission aiming to finish by August 1.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you're purchasing a home, we oversee mortgage lending in the state.
• If you're purchasing a home, we oversee mortgage lending in the state.
• There are state-chartered banks across the state.
• in charter to state.
• in charter to state.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• When I first ran for state representative, I pledged to work on ensuring that our state elections are
• Jennifer I'm Jennifer Decker state Jennifer I'm Jennifer Decker state representative<00:01:12.680
• bill was contributed by state bill was contributed by state representative<00:02:50.120> masseron
• did that come from I will defer to state did that come from I will defer to state representative
• libraries have funds to purchase libraries have funds to purchase materials<00:09:51.760> and

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:01 Attendance Roll Call: 00:04 HB 684 (Rep. Decker): 00:49 HB 71 (Rep. Duvall): 06:55 HB 290 (Rep. Wilson): 09:20 HB 555 (Rep. Freeland): 15:21 HB 160 (Rep. Witten): 16:30 HB 455 (Rep. Flannery): 22:04 Adjournment: 27:21, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government considered several bills. House Bill 684, an elections “continuous improvement” measure, drew the most discussion. Rep. Jennifer Decker said it was based on issues identified during the 2024 election cycle and included changes to absentee voting for primary caregivers and other election administration updates. Senators focused on a committee substitute removing credit and debit cards as a second form of ID for provisional ballots; Decker said local election workers had reported people trying to use cards with no photo ID, and she did not want financial institutions determining voter eligibility. The bill also clarified that certain ballots could be issued by hand or by mail. It passed 9-1, with some members voting no or passing because they wanted more time to consider the ID change. House Bill 71, requested by the Kentucky Public Pension Authority, would reorganize KPPA by creating an Office of Financial Management and moving the CFO into an executive director-level role. Testimony said the change was structural only, with no impact on system funding and minimal short-term costs. It passed unanimously, 11-0. House Bill 290, by Rep. Nick Wilson, would allow county law libraries to use funds for online legal research resources, computers, and internet-related equipment. Supporters said libraries had money but were limited to buying books; the bill passed unanimously, with the chair noting it would let libraries use existing funds more effectively. House Bill 555, as amended by committee substitute, addressed audit and reporting requirements for small cities. Supporters from the Kentucky League of Cities and the Auditor’s Office said many small cities struggle to find certified CPAs, and the bill would raise the threshold for less frequent audits, expand the exemption threshold, allow the Auditor’s Office to contract to perform audits, and clarify that state-fund withholding for noncompliance would not apply to contractual or utility payments. It passed 10-1, and the title amendment was adopted. House Bill 160, with a committee substitute, would regulate manufactured housing and local zoning by establishing standards that supporters said were needed to prevent discrimination against modern manufactured homes. Several senators expressed concern about state interference in local zoning, while others supported the bill as a housing access measure; it passed 10-1. Finally, House Bill 455 would create a Unit of Election Investigations and Security in the Attorney General’s Office to handle election-crime allegation review, the voter fraud hotline, prosecutorial referrals, and legislative oversight. Supporters said it codified existing practices and would not require new funding, but opponents objected to placing the hotline in a partisan office. The bill passed 9-1 with one pass, and the committee adjourned after reporting favorable action on the bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• Budget Director.
• Budget Director.
• <00:10:43.320> something been much better to purchase something been much better to purchase
• In fact, I spent yesterday in Pikeville with the interim FEMA director, my county judge, and Director
• in pikel with the interim FEMA director in pikel with the interim FEMA director and<00:34:26.520

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:05 Capitol Renovations Update 00:00:40 Damage from Recent Disaster Discussion 00:33:25, 958, all

Summary: The committee met for its third meeting of the session and received an update on the Capitol renovation project from Finance and Administration Secretary Holly Johnson and State Budget Director John Hicks. They reported the project budget remains $291.52 million, with Messer Construction as construction manager, and said the temporary legislative chamber completion has slipped into 2025 because of wiring, voting machine, KET camera, and canopy work. They outlined the current bid schedule: site and utility bids due February 27, 2025; roofing and fourth-floor structural work due April 24; major renovation bids due May 23; bid review in late May and early June; roofing and fourth-floor work beginning in late June; and overall construction starting July 7, 2025. A major focus of the discussion was the project contingency, which officials said is only $10.8 million for an older building with significant unknown conditions. They explained that earlier investigations led to about $60 million in value engineering cuts, including more than $40 million tied to unexpectedly extensive terrace damage on the north, south, and east sides. The terraces were originally expected to need only minor work, but officials said investigations showed reconstruction would eventually be necessary and could not be handled by simple restoration. They also said the mechanical equipment plan changed from a basement location to a vault under the east parking lot, and that the west terrace will still see some ADA-related work. Committee members questioned why the terrace work was not included in the current budget, whether doing it later would cost more, and why bids and construction planning had taken so long. Officials said the terraces were left out because of cost, that future work would likely be more expensive because of market escalation, and that the timing reflected extensive investigation needed to produce reliable bids. Members also raised concerns about scaffolding and the temporary chambers; officials clarified that the scaffolding discussed was for the separate Capitol Dome project, not the chamber project, and said the Dome scaffolding is part of that project cost and is expected to come down in early 2027. They said the temporary chambers are expected to be used for three sessions, through the 28th session, with a return to the Capitol planned for the 29th session, and that public tours of the Capitol would likely end around June depending on the bid results and construction schedule.