Transcript Highlights:

• We identified a statewide We identified a statewide legal research platform.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee first heard from Alan Kavanaugh regarding his gubernatorial appointment and reappointment to the Pardons and Parole Commission. Kavanaugh, a longtime law enforcement officer, described his approach as conservative on parole, strongly victim-focused, and centered on public safety and fair, professional hearings. Senators asked about workload, decision-making factors, and success stories; Kavanaugh highlighted a veteran who used parole successfully to rebuild his life and support other veterans, and he praised programs that help inmates gain work skills and stability before release. Committee members also discussed the importance of adequately funding the commission. The appointment itself was not voted on at this meeting and was deferred to the next meeting. Eric Fredrickson, the state public defender, then gave an update on the Public Defense Act and the transition to a statewide public defense system. He reviewed the history of public defense reform in Idaho, described the creation of the Office of the State Public Defender, and said the office now uses statewide systems for case management, legal research, and billing. Fredrickson said the office initially faced major disruption, including a backlog of more than 1,300 cases and attorneys leaving flat-fee contracts, but that the system is now caught up. He reported that increased funding in 2025 allowed the office to hire dozens of attorneys and support staff, fully staff several new institutional offices, and reduce contract rates to improve recruitment. Senators asked about holdbacks, backlog, judge relations, and future needs; Fredrickson said the office cut travel and training, is working closely with judges and clerks, and wants to add more attorneys and social workers, as well as develop an Idaho-specific workload standard. The committee then considered two RS drafts for print. RS 32880 C1, sponsored by Senator Foreman, would bar Idaho courts from enforcing or considering judgments based on religious or cultural law that do not conform to the U.S. and Idaho constitutions. Foreman said the measure was intended to protect constitutional supremacy and prevent foreign or religious legal systems from replacing Idaho law, while not restricting private religious practice. Some senators questioned whether the proposal was necessary or could conflict with religious liberty protections, but after discussion the committee voted to print the RS. RS 33006 C1, sponsored by Senator Nichols, would update Idaho’s existing Son of Sam law to prevent criminals from profiting from notoriety through modern media such as podcasts, streaming, royalties, and licensing, while adding explicit free-speech protections. Nichols said the current law is outdated and constitutionally vulnerable; the committee moved to print that RS as well before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• IT'S ROBOTIC PLATFORMS YOU CAN MODIFY EASILY, COMMUNITY SUPPORTED LIBRARIES WHICH MEANS RATHER THAN STARTING

Transcript Highlights:

• points, and law enforcement agencies to evaluate the steps needed to create a secure web-based alert platform

Summary: The Criminal Justice Committee met with several members excused and first took up SB 350, which clarifies public records protections for crime victims and extends temporary confidentiality to law enforcement officers involved in use-of-force incidents for 72 hours, with a possible written extension up to 60 days. Senator Graal said the bill was intended to align with the Florida Constitution’s victim definition and to address privacy concerns without allowing indefinite withholding. Testimony from Marsy’s Law and the Florida PBA supported the measure, though there were questions about the 60-day period. The committee reported SB 350 favorably. The committee then considered two domestic violence-related bills by Senator Berman. CS/SB 296, after a delete-all amendment, directs a study of a secure web-based alert platform that would give domestic violence victims a unique phone number and code-based emergency alert system, and it expands Florida’s address confidentiality program to dating violence victims. Several speakers, including survivors and advocates, described the need for safer ways to seek help without alerting abusers. The bill was reported favorably. CS/SB 298 similarly expanded confidentiality protections for the Haven Coordinating Council records to cover dating violence victims, and it was also reported favorably. Later, the committee heard SB 398, which updates Florida statutes by replacing the term “child pornography” with “child sexual abuse material,” including conforming changes to the offense severity ranking chart. The bill was reported favorably. The committee also heard SB 156, the Jason Raynor Act, which changes resisting-an-officer language, removes references to lawful or unlawful duty in favor of “any duties,” and adds manslaughter of a law enforcement officer to offenses requiring a life sentence. Law enforcement groups supported the bill, while the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers raised concerns about removing judicial discretion and eliminating a statutory protection against force when an officer knows an arrest is unlawful. Despite those objections, the committee reported the bill favorably. Finally, the committee approved SB 168 on public nuisances, which expands nuisance law to include gambling houses, increases penalties, allows attorney fees, and authorizes foreclosure for unpaid fees, and CS/SB 54, which after amendment focuses on medical examiner procedures and reporting related to violent offenders and toxicology/psychotropic drug review. Both bills were reported favorably. The meeting ended after members recorded additional affirmative votes and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It gives us a good platform for small counties to have that representation on committees like that.

Summary: The committee heard presentations on domestic security and public safety priorities from Gulf County Sheriff Mike Harrison and Tallahassee Police Chief Lawrence Rebel. Sheriff Harrison outlined Florida Sheriffs Association priorities, including reclassifying xylazine as a Schedule I controlled substance with a veterinary-use exemption, expanding enforcement of pretrial release violations beyond domestic violence cases, providing tuition-waiver benefits for sheriff’s office personnel, advancing the Jason Rainer Act to increase penalties for violent offenses against law enforcement, extending sex-offender residency restrictions, improving access to mental-health-related databases, and continuing support for fusion centers and Florida model jail standards. Members asked questions about xylazine’s veterinary use, canine detection, and public records burdens on small agencies; no votes were taken on these items. Chief Rebel focused on the Florida Police Chiefs Association’s role in disaster response, officer training, and wellness. He described the association’s coordination through the state EOC and regional deployments during hurricanes, then emphasized officer suicide and the need for statewide wellness resources, peer support, and accessible behavioral health care for first responders. He also referenced prior PTSD benefits legislation and urged continued support for the PCIS program and other wellness initiatives. Committee members discussed related resources such as dispatcher support, the Restore program at UCF, hyperbaric chamber treatment for PTSD, and canine support organizations. On domestic security funding, Rebel said FPCA does not have a specific bill package but wants to preserve the Domestic Security Oversight Council and regional task forces, protect limited SHISGAP funding for new projects, and shift ongoing successful programs to state funding. He also supported fixing the long-gun carry loophole, continuing the Jason Rainer Act effort, allowing ethical law-enforcement use of AI with human review, addressing monetization of public records and body-camera footage, and maintaining the ability to investigate anonymous complaints. The committee adjourned after discussion; no formal action or votes were recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• target seniors, non-English speakers, people of color, and those who are less familiar with digital platforms

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• bill, and it also conflicts with the call to abolish all these toll roads in Plank 51 of the RPT platform

Transcript Highlights:

• progress, but an opportunity to just kind of start building those bridges and lay out a really a platform

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• our office. partner in helping to extend the voice that we have both on social media and on local platforms

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• you have an outline and can you all put together some notion of what we could use as a universal platform

Transcript Highlights:

• And you all put together some notion of what we could use as a universal platform for these permitting

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> ALSO, WITH THE PLATFORM OF THE DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM FEMA IT IS THAT THEY WANT ALL THIS DONE WITHIN

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• parental controls, certainly with these apps and with the companies, regardless of the social media platforms
• earlier and what I've read earlier, that many times they are sent—the app sends them to another platform
• they are sent the app sends them to they are sent the app sends them to another<00:42:16.560><c> platform
• ><c> is</c><00:42:17.839><c> not</c><00:42:18.240><c> what</c><00:42:18.640><c> that</c> another platform
• that is not what that another platform that is not what that child<00:42:19.359><c> or</c><00:42:19.680

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• couple years we would use a Salesforce couple years we would use a Salesforce pla<01:50:39.040><c> platform
• 39.719><c> may</c><01:50:39.880><c> have</c><01:50:40.000><c> heard</c><01:50:40.159><c> us</c> pla platform
• which you may have heard us pla platform which you may have heard us talking<01:50:40.840><c> about<
• I’ve also published novel research in privacy and international platforms, and I hold a PhD in computational
• I’ve also published novel research in privacy and international platforms, and I hold a PhD in computational

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Broadband internet is still not a universal reality in Minnesota.
• printed and mailed guide.<00:37:25.599><c> Uh</c><00:37:26.079><c> broadband</c><00:37:26.640><c> internet
• Uh broadband internet is still guide.
• Uh broadband internet is still not<00:37:27.599><c> a</c><00:37:27.839><c> universal</c><00:37:28.320

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• be appropriated back out, uh, for broadband expansion specifically to municipalities that provide internet
• specifically to municipalities<01:40:52.159><c> that</c><01:40:52.480><c> provide</c><01:40:52.880><c> internet
• </c> municipalities that provide internet municipalities that provide internet services. services. services

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• paragraph at the end that would say, “For the purposes of this section, records made available on the internet
• section, records made available on this section, records made available on the<00:47:12.720><c> internet
• 13.280><c> a</c><00:47:13.440><c> state</c><00:47:13.599><c> or</c><00:47:13.839><c> local</c> the internet
• by a state or local the internet by a state or local government<00:47:14.480><c> official,</c><00:47

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Please note that the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifier's end
• Please note that the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifier's end
• Please note that the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifier's end
• Please note that the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifier's end

Bills: HB1721, HB1714, HB1718, HB1732, HB1740, HB1777, HB1842, HB1919, HB1701, HB1923, HB1741, HB1734, HB1739

Keywords: housing, expedited permits, insurance, indemnification, construction, affordable housing, executive compensation, Hawaii housing finance, legislative approval, low-income housing, moderate-income housing, mixed-use development, transit-oriented development, TOD, county powers, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, HHFDC, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, DHHL, affordable housing credits

Summary: The House Housing Committee met on February 4 and heard testimony on several housing measures, beginning with HB1721, which clarifies insurance, indemnification, and certificate-of-occupancy requirements for expedited permits. Testimony on HB1721 was uniformly supportive from the American Council of Engineering Companies, the Grassroot Institute, and individual testifiers, who said the bill would fix insurance issues for design professionals and encourage more participation in the expedited-permit program. No opposition was heard and no questions were raised. The committee then heard HB1714, which would raise salary caps for the executive director and deputy executive director positions at the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation and allow more autonomy in personnel matters, including employment contracts. HHFDC supported the bill, saying greater flexibility is needed to recruit and retain staff and that current pay ceilings are not the main issue because the agency lacks operating funds to reach them. The Department of Human Resources Development offered comments and raised concerns about autonomous personnel authority and employment contracts, saying state personnel matters are governed by existing statutes and collective bargaining rules; the Hawaii Public Housing Authority also offered comments, and one board member and one individual opposed the measure. Members questioned whether performance-based pay or existing incentive policies could address retention instead of statutory salary changes. The committee also heard HB1718, which would make permanent county authority to facilitate mixed-use developments and issue county bonds for low- and moderate-income housing projects. Support came from OPSD, HHFDC, the City and County of Honolulu’s Department of Housing and Land Management, and Housing Hawaii’s Future, all emphasizing that permanent authority is needed to finance long-term mixed-use and transit-oriented projects. A member asked whether the sunset provision would make bonding impractical, and the city representative agreed that temporary authority would make financing difficult because development takes time. Later, the committee took up HB1732, establishing the Kamina Homes program to fund counties’ purchase of voluntary deed restrictions from eligible buyers. The Department of Taxation and several groups, including HHFDC, AARP Hawaii, the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, Hawaii Realtors, Holomua Collaborative, and others testified, with most supporting the bill as a way to help local families remain in Hawaii and age in place. Holomua said a recent survey found 75% of 3,200 working families were considering moving, and argued the bill could preserve housing for local residents. Members asked about the bill’s 8% cap on deed-restriction cost and why the program focuses on residency rather than resale restrictions; the bill’s proponents said the cap allows flexibility for county negotiations and that the measure is aimed at workforce preservation rather than land-trust-style appreciation limits. Finally, the committee heard HB1740, which would modify a prior HHFDC housing pathway by reducing the qualified-resident requirement from 100% to 80% and allowing more flexibility for long-term rental instead of owner occupancy. HHFDC and Holomua Collaborative supported the change, saying the earlier 100% requirement had produced no developments or applicants and that the revised standard would make projects more feasible while still preserving housing for local residents. The committee did not take final votes on these measures during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Please note, the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifiers' end.
• will be posted. the House is not responsible for any bad the House is not responsible for any bad internet
• connections</c><00:15:43.600><c> on</c><00:15:43.839><c> the</c><00:15:44.000><c> testifiers</c> internet
• connections on the testifiers internet connections on the testifiers end. end. end.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land met on February 3, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills, with the chair emphasizing a two-minute limit and noting that bills would die if the hearing ran past noon. For HB 1848, the Commission on Water Resource Management and the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development both supported the measure with technical, non-substantive amendments. Testimony focused on requiring early consultation about water availability in district boundary amendment petitions, with water officials explaining that the petitioner should submit a written statement reflecting consultation and that the goal was to identify water constraints earlier in the development process. The Land Use Commission’s representative opposed the bill, arguing that water availability is already addressed through existing environmental review and agency consultation, that the issue had been raised and rejected before, and that the proposal could create unnecessary delay or litigation. The committee then heard HB 1728 on rainwater catchment systems. The Commission on Water Resource Management said it acknowledged the bill’s intent but deferred to counties and other regulatory agencies, including the Department of Health, on regulatory implications. Hawaii Realtors testified in support. No vote was taken during the portion of the hearing shown. For HB 1652 on storm water management systems, the Hawaiian Lifeguard Association opposed the bill, arguing it would weaken protections created by Act 281 (“Sharkey’s Law”) and increase drowning risk for children by exempting certain water features from safety requirements. The American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii supported the bill, saying the language clarifies and better balances child safety with practical green stormwater infrastructure, including depth-based limits and exemptions for certain agricultural ponds. The Hawaii Farm Bureau also supported the agricultural pond exemption, saying such ponds are used for irrigation, livestock, and fire control and are generally away from the public. A private testifier, Allison Schaers, opposed the bill and described her daughter’s drowning in a detention basin, arguing that poor maintenance can turn stormwater features into dangerous hazards. The hearing ended without any recorded committee action or vote in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you want to look up on the internet, or ChatGPT, or AI, a veteran definition of a general discharge
• If you want to look up on the<00:31:33.120><c> internet</c><00:31:33.760><c> any,</c><00:31:34.240><c
• 34.399><c> know,</c><00:31:34.559><c> or</c><00:31:34.960><c> chat</c><00:31:35.440><c> GPT</c> the internet
• any, you know, or chat GPT the internet any, you know, or chat GPT or<00:31:36.320><c> or</c><00:31:

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held public hearings on three transportation bills. SB 154 would add the Snow Traveler Foundation to the list of charitable organizations authorized to offer multi-use decal plates through the existing Department of Safety program. Senator David Roford said the bill would create a non-tax funding source for snowmobile trail maintenance, especially after flood damage, and Dan Gold of the New Hampshire Snowmobile Association said the foundation would accept tax-deductible donations for projects such as upgraded trail signage. He explained that the association’s 96 volunteer clubs maintain about 7,000 miles of trails and that the sign program is costly. No opposition was presented, and the hearing was closed after questions from members about the foundation’s status and fundraising goals. SB 271 would expand eligibility for veteran license plates to include veterans with a general discharge under honorable conditions. The sponsor’s representative said the change would recognize service members who are already eligible for many veterans benefits but are excluded from plates under current law. Supporters included Phil Grizzo, who argued that general discharges often reflect service that was otherwise honorable, and Kevin Grady of the State Veterans Advisory Committee, which said it strongly supported the bill and was also considering broader statutory cleanup to standardize the definition of veteran across state law. Committee members asked whether the change should be limited to plates or applied more broadly, but the sponsor said broader changes would be a separate policy question. The public hearing was then closed. SB 273, titled “Cheryl’s Law,” would update New Hampshire’s move-over requirements for motorists approaching stopped or standing vehicles on the roadside, including stranded vehicles and those with warning signals. Senator Donovan Fenton said the bill was intended to save lives and honor Staff Sergeant Jesse Cheryl and Brigadier General John Pogo, both of whom died in roadside incidents. He said the measure would require drivers to slow down, change lanes if safe, and move over for roadside vehicles, with the intent of education rather than punishment. Committee members asked about enforcement, the lack of a fiscal note, whether the bill applied statewide, and whether the language could be read as weakening the move-over requirement; the sponsor said it applied to all roads, did not change fines, and was meant to clarify and broaden safety obligations. The hearing continued with additional questions, and the sponsor said state police and other safety stakeholders supported the approach.

Transcript Highlights:

• Please note the House is not responsible for any bad internet connections on the testifiers' end.
• 06.280><c> bad</c> the house is not responsible for any bad the house is not responsible for any bad internet
• connections</c><00:19:07.159><c> on</c><00:19:07.280><c> the</c><00:19:07.400><c> testifiers</c> internet
• connections on the testifiers internet connections on the testifiers end<00:19:08.960><c> in</c><00:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee met on March 19, 2025, and first heard SB 137 SD2 HD1 relating to electric utilities. The Division of Consumer Advocacy and the Public Utilities Commission said they stood on their written comments, IBEW Local 1260 supported the bill, and Ulupono Initiative also supported it. Hawaiian Electric supported the intent but asked for an amendment, saying the bill’s definition of “acquiring entity” was too broad and could unintentionally cover purely local utility transactions. A later witness from Life of the Land supported the bill only if the merger/acquisition language were removed, arguing the PUC would not have a workable mechanism to let a cooperative intervene in a utility sale process. Committee members questioned whether the bill could still work without that section, and Ulupono said it was open to clarifying language but did not seek to remove the provision; the discussion ended without a vote in the excerpt provided. The committee then took up SB 1220 SD2 relating to a renewable gas tariff. The Division of Consumer Advocacy and the PUC again stood on written comments. HGas strongly supported the measure, saying it would create a faster, more cost-effective path for a voluntary renewable gas tariff without requiring a full rate case, while preserving PUC oversight and consumer protections. The Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas also supported the bill, emphasizing that it would expand consumer choice and help Hawaii’s clean energy goals while keeping the program voluntary and shielding non-participating customers from costs. Henry Curtis of Life of the Land opposed the bill, arguing that HGas already had an active rate case and could have raised the issue there, and that the proposal did not increase renewable gas supply or speed up acquisition; he called it a gimmick. In response, HGas said the bill was mainly a mechanism to speed filing and that the details would be worked out in a PUC docket. Committee members pressed HGas on whether the measure would actually add renewable gas, what source would be used, and whether customers would simply be paying more for the same gas; HGas said it had two projects in development, including banagrass and hydrogen-related work, and that the tariff would be a voluntary opt-in rate for customers seeking renewable natural gas to meet sustainability goals. No vote was taken in the excerpt provided.