Transcript Highlights:

• Security for colleges and universities can be substituted for House Bill 3741 that are vulnerable to a taxed
• There's broad need for everything from tax and administrative law and personnel law and so forth, but
• On set, they build sets, and they're not building things up to codes, but they have to have some kind
• You're not running up to code standard. lighting, you're just running.
• And so we're just trying to ensure that these youth have that support. on this next critical chapter

Bills: HB232

Keywords: disaster recovery, natural disaster, weather disaster, emergency relief, flood relief, hurricane relief, storm damage, wildfire, tornado, hail, windstorm, extreme heat, ice storm, snowstorm, property damage, personal injury, temporary housing, relocation assistance, lost wages, state emergency management

Transcript Highlights:

• taxes taxes um<00:08:35.760> lastly<00:08:36.120> I<00:08:36.200> got<00:08:36.320
• c> The transit accommodation tax, the GT tax, you know, because these funds support our infrastructure
• <00:24:01.919> values strong tax base and since our tax values strong tax base and since our
• tax code we tiered progressivity to our tax code we tiered our<00:24:39.880> non-owner<00:24:
• up about 48% of our real property tax up about 48% of our real property tax revenue<00:26:24.640

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• capacity from the federal government each year, per the tax code, which is divided between the Business
• tax code which is each year uh per the tax code which is divided<00:11:40.839> between<00:11:
• code is funded um but but we use the tax code is funded um but but we use the state<00:17:52.480>
• Other larger taxes include the meals and rooms tax, the tobacco tax, and the real estate transfer tax
• c> meals and rooms tax the tobacco tax and meals and rooms tax the tobacco tax and the<01:08:55.199><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority officials, led by Executive Director Rob Dapice, briefed legislators on the agency’s structure and funding. They explained that the authority is created by state law but is not a state agency, its debt is not state debt, and it is governed by a board appointed by the governor and approved by the Executive Council. The discussion focused on the Affordable Housing Fund and the lead paint hazard remediation fund, including how state appropriations and federal resources are combined to finance affordable rental housing and lead abatement work. Dapice said the Affordable Housing Fund is used as gap financing for multifamily affordable housing projects, typically alongside federal tax credits and tax-exempt bonds, and that state dollars leverage roughly 2:1 to 10:1 in additional federal and private investment, averaging about 4:1. He said the fund has received historic appropriations in recent budgets, including $30 million over the last two biennial budgets and an annual $5 million set-aside from the real estate transfer tax. He also said the fund is usually structured as 0% interest, deferred loans rather than grants, with repayments returning to the fund if projects generate cash flow. Members asked about rents, oversight, staffing, revenues, and whether the programs had added positions. Dapice said affordability restrictions generally last 30 to 99 years, rents are tied to income limits and capped so tenants pay no more than 30% of income, and compliance staff inspect properties regularly to verify income eligibility and rent limits. He said the organization has about 130 to 135 employees, down from about 145, with no new positions added because of the appropriations. He estimated total revenues at roughly $300 million, with administrative budget around $22 million, much of it pass-through grant money. On lead paint remediation, he said the state first appropriated $6 million in 2019, plus $1 million in ARPA funds, and that the program has cleared more than 500 units. He said the federal grant program is not annual or predictable, with a recent award of about $7.75 million, and that the maximum federal grant per unit is $177,000, typically paired with up to $100,000 in state loan support. He also noted that the program can address homes before a child is poisoned if lead hazards are identified, but that cases involving an already exposed child are a higher priority. No votes or formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the way to do this was to do a tax credit by taking the construction TPP construction tax and give
• , with great jobs, tax revenue, people going out to eat, spending, correct, you know, doing sales tax
• So through income tax, supply chain... ...as a whole gets all these benefits, so through income tax,
• The bonds are tax-exempt by virtue of the district's status as a governmental entity for IRS tax-exempt
• For example, in the tax arena, you can go to Superior Court and challenge your tax classification, for

Bills: HB2128, HB2255, HB2397, HB2429, HB2591, HB2680, HB2834, HB2868, HB2911, HB2951, HB2979, HB2991, HB2996, HB2999, HB4001, HB4011, HB4017, HB4020, HB4026, HB4086, HB4088, HB2244, HB2342

Keywords: homeowners associations, condominiums, open meetings, governance, transparency, Arizona Teachers Academy, teacher preparation, education funding, public schools, scholarships, teacher certification, community colleges, HOA, homeowners association, planned community, condominium, CC&Rs, covenants, conditions and restrictions, resale disclosure, association disclosure

Transcript Highlights:

• is a committee strike-and-insert amendment before you, which moves the bill's provisions to a new code
• It amends a section in Chapter 3 of the code, clarifies that foreign drivers are not eligible to vote
• is a committee strike-and-insert amendment before you, which moves the bill's provisions to a new code
• It amends a section in Chapter 3 of the code, clarifies that foreign drivers are not eligible to vote

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It merely cross-references a pre-existing provision in the Welfare and Institutional Code, section 14132.26e2
• DHCS and CDS It merely cross-references a pre-existing provision in the Welfare and Institutional Code
• Services and Health Care Services' ability to waive the entirety of Division II of the Health and Safety Code
• It allows waiver of a variety of sections, but including Division II, which includes Chapter 3.2, which
• So existing health and safety code does not authorize the imposition.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Historic tax credit in terms of rural applications and the traditional tax credit.
• I know CDFI tax credit, and I'm going to come to that with Ms. Willis in a moment.
• In the same way salt stakes, if you want to keep on raising taxes, awesome.
• That means fewer tax dollars. That means less ability to meet our foreign policy requirements.
• Explain the tax implication of why they're doing that. Well, I think...

Keywords: affordable housing, government investment, barriers, legislative solutions, public testimony

Summary: The committee meeting focused on addressing the significant issue of affordable housing in America. Members expressed concern over the persistent barriers faced in the housing sector, despite substantial government investment aimed at alleviating these issues. It was highlighted that government interference plays a critical role in complicating the housing landscape, and discussions revolved around potential legislative approaches to mitigate these challenges. Several witnesses provided testimony, contributing to a thorough exploration of the topic.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, Chapter 197 laid a new foundation.
• both supplement and expand upon the important reforms sponsored by this committee in what became Chapter
• the committee to favorably report each of these bills to make further progress after the passage of Chapter
• , that is NFPA 101, and health care facilities code.
• NFPA 101 and health care facilities code.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Committee on Aging and Independence heard testimony on a package of long-term care and elder care bills focused on building on the state’s 2024 long-term care reform law (Chapter 197). Richard Moore of Dignity Alliance urged favorable action on the bills as a “long-term care 2.0” effort, arguing they would strengthen the workforce, protect residents’ rights, improve clinical quality, and increase transparency and sustainability in nursing homes and other facilities. He also raised concerns about staffing funds not reaching direct care workers and suggested further oversight of how appropriated money is spent. Patricia Crispy of the American Nurses Association testified in support of House Bill 766, which would require at least one registered nurse with full voting rights on the board of directors or trustees of every acute care hospital and nursing home. She and the bill’s sponsor, Representative Vanado, said nurses’ clinical expertise and 24/7 presence make them valuable contributors to governance and patient safety. Committee members asked whether the bill would cover assisted living and how many facilities already have nurse board members; the witness said she would provide more data and clarify the assisted living question. Senator Lovely testified on two bills: Senate 479, which would expand transparency and accountability in long-term care by tightening fire safety, smoking, hearing-loss, and ownership disclosure requirements, adding advocacy groups to an advisory committee, and increasing penalties; and Senate 480/House 795, which would require single-occupancy rooms in nursing homes unless residents consent to share, to improve privacy and reduce infection spread. Deborah De Benedictus also testified in support of House 759, describing her father’s experience in assisted living and arguing for the use of cameras in elder care facilities to monitor care and deter neglect. The committee discussed privacy concerns, notification rules, and the need for honest staffing and care practices, and then adjourned without taking any recorded votes or formal actions in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is this is kind of a new chapter. Is that right?
• error code: 520 Most schools I would say no.
• We'll see you in your chapters around the state. Yes, sir. Thank you. Thank you.
• chapter.
• Texas A&M as a whole has done a great job in supporting me and my chapter. as well.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think it would be no different than us all paying taxes to our schools.
• Up at Dartmouth, they gave me a sheet of paper that just said fetal anomaly with a code, and that was
• and that was my counseling I got a code and that was my counseling I got it<01:28:41.080> in<
• not that money has been raised by taxes not that money has been raised by taxes or<04:01:43.040>
• <04:41:56.958> within but you can create certain codes within but you can create certain codes

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 662, which would require public schools to include discussion of abortion procedures and show specified videos in health education classes. The prime sponsor argued the bill would ensure students receive medically accurate, age-appropriate, and nonpolitical information about abortion, saying the topic is important for informed decision-making and should be taught consistently statewide. He said the videos were intended for grades 9-12, that parents could opt out, and that the requirement was meant to supplement, not sway, students’ views. He also acknowledged the bill could be seen as limiting local control over curriculum and said the intent was to prevent the topic from being missed due to scheduling disruptions. Committee members questioned the sponsor about local control, the need for a video mandate, the source of his statistics, whether the bill could be biased or inflammatory, and whether the requirement should apply every year in high school. The sponsor said the videos were only a starting point, could be replaced by others, and were meant to be informational. He also said the bill was not intended to influence students’ decisions about abortion. Several supporters testified in favor, including representatives of New Hampshire Right to Life and others who said students should be told the “truth” about abortion and its consequences. They emphasized graphic or emotionally difficult aspects of abortion and argued that young people need this information to make informed choices. Opponents and skeptical witnesses raised concerns about prescribing curriculum, eroding local control, and the appropriateness of the material for younger high school students. The New Hampshire School Administrators Association said the bill was overly prescriptive, that health education standards are already set by the State Board of Education, and that the topics in the bill are not part of the current standards. That witness recommended the committee consider retaining the bill for further work or making it less prescriptive. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 450, Section 52, is codified in Chapter 159, Section 52 of the Laws of 2025.
• you know, over the past few years, and we anticipate this moving forward, the supplemental severance tax
• meeting, once the auditing is complete, we'll be moving into specific items on these, including a code
• It's in share Z codes, which are legislative appropriations, and other items like SB9 that come out of

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the Code Advisor.
• I'm Allison, and I'm the Deputy Code Revisor. Senator Holy, a new member.
• Kevin Trottwell, assistant code reviser. And the linchpin to everything we do.
• Christopher Lewis, Assistant Code Revisor. Hi, Chris. And Jill. Hi, Chris. And Jill.
• And the other one pertains to our public records chapter.

Summary: The committee began with introductions of members and staff, then approved the minutes from the previous meeting and approved a step increase for Code Advisor Kathy Buckley. Staff reported on publication sales and distribution, noting that 2024 paper and paid sales were down from prior years, while online access and reduced demand for printed copies continued to trend downward. Members discussed the continuing role of printed RCWs and session laws, with staff explaining that libraries and counties remain the main paper purchasers and that some specialized titles are still produced in print and electronic formats. The committee then reviewed a table of “multiple actions” affecting RCW sections from the 2025 session. Staff explained that 153 sections had multiple amendments or related actions, but most could be merged through editorial authority; about 10 sections would likely need future legislative cleanup. The committee approved the table, allowing staff to proceed with merging where possible. Financially, staff reported the office was on track to return about $542,000 to the state, though that amount may decrease slightly because of end-of-year purchases, including a shared printer for LSS. They also noted a slight budget reduction for the next fiscal year, but said staffing adjustments and existing coverage should prevent problems. The committee discussed upcoming rulemaking to align the office’s public records procedures with House and Senate practices, including designating a public records officer and updating language to reflect current legislative structure. Staff said the process would follow standard APA rulemaking and could take roughly six months. Members also heard about a prior “video auditor” incident at the office and the office’s response and training. Finally, staff provided a building update: the office is scheduled to move back into the renovated Pritchard building on September 14, 2026, with furniture selection underway. At the end of the meeting, staff shared session statistics, including 424 session law chapters, 1,305 House bills introduced, 1,082 Senate bills introduced, 238 House bills passed, and 193 Senate bills passed, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Slide 8 shows the regional flood planning statutory requirements, which are contained in Chapter 16 of
• the Texas Water Code.
• Can you just kind of explain to me the correlation between the taxes we already pay for drainage discharges
• Yeah, they currently have a tax that they charge, right? So, it depends on how they were set up.
• But we can't get any buy-in in the communities to add a tax to their tax liability throughout the year

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• it's property tax or any other taxes.
• it's property tax or any other taxes.
• it's property tax or any other taxes.
• Because somebody escrows their taxes. They have no tax bill or a part of a tax bill.
• It's not on tax mill levies. It's not on your tax, how many levies or mills you can levy.

Summary: The committee met to receive a series of audit presentations, beginning with the statewide Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for fiscal year 2025. The State Auditor’s Office and OMB reported a clean, unmodified opinion for the state, with strong financial results including a $40.6 billion net position, $30.99 billion in assets, $1.81 billion in liabilities, and continued Legacy Fund growth. OMB also explained the new GASB 101 compensated-absences reporting change and discussed pension-liability fluctuations tied to discount-rate assumptions and investment performance. Members asked about how the state compares to others and about the effect of short-term commodity price swings, and OMB said the report reflects actual fiscal-year results rather than forecasts. The committee then heard the University System audit, which also received a clean opinion but included four findings: misreporting of Strategic Investment and Improvements Fund revenue, insufficient monitoring of service organizations at CTS, NDSU, and UND, improper bank reconciliations at Dakota College of Bottineau, Dickinson State, and Williston State, and investment/cash reconciliation problems at Bismarck State College related to bond proceeds. University officials agreed with the findings and said corrective actions were underway, including internal review of bank reconciliations. Members raised questions about NDSU’s use of certificates of deposit, and university staff explained that CDs are used to earn interest on funds being accumulated for future projects. Several other audits were presented, most with clean opinions and no findings, including the State Auditor’s Office, Workforce Safety and Insurance, Housing Finance Agency, Housing Incentive Fund, Job Service North Dakota, the Retirement and Investment Office, PERS, the Center for Distance Education, the Commission on Legal Counsel for Indigents, the Ethics Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. Notable exceptions included a State Fair Association audit with an adverse opinion on the foundation component unit because its financial statements were not available for audit, and a Securities Department performance audit finding that performance-based pay increases and bonuses were issued without required evaluations. The committee also discussed the State Auditor’s future needs, including more staff capacity, data analytics, cybersecurity reviews, possible subpoena authority, independent legal counsel, and whether some audits—such as the Ethics Commission and State Fair—should be handled by independent third parties or under different statutory arrangements.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'll have the code call roll. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• You know, I don't have that Century Code section up in front of me, but it's my understanding that, yes
• “Person” is a defined term throughout the code, which could indicate an agency like Health and Human
• That would be under a different chapter of code, so this is narrow.
• Chapter 1409.06.6.6.6. We want to get specific with regard to that.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Just quickly, Chapter 27, or Section 27 on page 59, takes away the authority for the Chapter 72 administrative
• Just quickly, Chapter 27, or Section 27 on page 59, takes away the authority for the Chapter 72 administrative
• <01:50:38.199> 72 of 1 15 a-8 so that what the chapter 72 of 1 15 a-8 so that what the chapter
• 72 amendments it is not of the chapter 72 amendments it is not chapter<01:51:57.719> 72<01:51
• All right, let's start with SB 822 SD2, relating to the landlord-tenant code.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 48 SD2 HD1 relating to combat sports. The Attorney General offered a technical comment on the bill’s effective date, and several testifiers from the combat sports community strongly supported the measure with amendments. They argued that boxing and MMA should be treated separately, that the current regulatory structure has made events too costly and reduced opportunities, and that more local oversight would help revive the sport and give youth a constructive outlet. Committee members questioned whether the bill’s medical staffing requirements would apply to boxing, MMA, or both, and whether the added requirements would increase costs and reduce access. The witness from the combat sports community said amateur boxing is already regulated through USA Boxing, that the DCCA should focus on professional boxing, and that for safety he would support two physicians and one ambulance for boxing and MMA events. The committee then took up SB 117 SD2 HD1 relating to transportation. The Department of Transportation and the Ulon Initiative testified in support, and the bicycling community was listed as supporting as well. Members focused on the bill’s rebate program for electric transportation devices, asking how successful it had been and whether removing the rebate would affect use. DOT said the program began in February 2023 and had issued about 500 rebates totaling roughly $166,000, aimed at helping people without vehicles access transportation options. The department explained that the bill would broaden access and increase the rebate amount, including additional assistance for low-income applicants. Finally, the committee heard SB 897 SD3 HD1 relating to energy and wildfire liability. The Division of Consumer Advocacy, the Public Utilities Commission, the Attorney General, Clearway Energy Group, Ulon Initiative, Kawai K, IBEW Local 1260, and Hawaiian Electric all testified in support, while the Hawaii Association for Justice was listed as opposed but not present. Supporters said the bill would help finance wildfire mitigation and infrastructure improvements through securitization, reduce wildfire risk, and address utility cost and credit concerns. Hawaiian Electric emphasized that the bill is forward-looking, would help protect customers from future wildfire-related cost increases, and requested amendments including a study on a future wildfire recovery fund. In questioning, members pressed Hawaiian Electric on the liability cap, asking whether it would have applied to the Maui wildfires and whether it would cover personal injury or wrongful death; the witness and company counsel clarified that the aggregate cap applies only to qualifying property damage, not personal injury or wrongful death, and said they would follow up on how the cap would calculate in a Maui-type event. Hawaiian Electric also said it would seek financing under the bill if enacted and updated members on settlement funding efforts, including raising the first $550 million in equity and divesting assets to help meet its obligations.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so, but on line 23, you can't use a solar tax credit.
• Oh, and, you know, tax credit, it may not apply. It may not apply. I don't, I don't understand tax.
• We all agree that tax credits get us there quicker.
• If the tax credits go away, they will not build this anymore.
• That is your Senate Tax, Business, and Transportation Committee.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Marissa McClinton here with Sierra Club Delaware Chapter. Good afternoon.
• Marissa McClinton here with Sierra Club Delaware Chapter, here in support of House Bill 111.
• Good afternoon, Marissa McClinton, Sierra Club Delaware Chapter, Environmental Justice Organizer.
• House Bill 456 updates the Subaqueous Land Chapter of the Code with the intent of reducing permitting
• House Bill 3-456 updates the Sub-Aquacious Land Chapter of the Code with the intent of reducing permitting

Summary: The committee met in hybrid format on June 18, 2026, but initially lacked a quorum, so minutes were not approved until later in the meeting after additional members joined. The committee heard a series of bills, with most receiving supportive testimony from sponsors, agency officials, advocacy groups, and frequent public commenter Robert Overmiller. Several measures focused on transportation and public safety, including HB 363 on residential speed limits, HB 384 extending DelDOT open-end contracts from three to five years, HB 413 allowing green flashing lights on road work and emergency vehicles, HB 456 streamlining subaqueous lands permitting, and HB 388 letting drivers with temporary medical suspensions keep their license for ID purposes while being flagged in the system as not allowed to drive. Members asked questions mainly about implementation, enforcement, and scope, and sponsors or agency witnesses explained that the bills were intended to improve safety, efficiency, and administrative clarity. The committee also took up HB 111, which would require single-use food service items such as utensils, straws, napkins, and condiments to be provided only upon request, with exemptions for schools, nonprofits, health care facilities, correctional facilities, and similar settings. Supporters, including Plastic Free Delaware and the Sierra Club, said the bill would reduce waste and save businesses money, while opponents from the restaurant industry argued it could confuse customers, hurt tourism, and be difficult to enforce. Sponsors emphasized that restaurants could still ask customers if they wanted items and that the bill included a phase-in period and capped penalties. The committee also heard HB 393, a consumer protection bill for third-party electric suppliers that tightens oversight, training, reporting, renewal notices, and rate limits after concerns about misleading sales and unexpectedly high bills; it drew support from environmental advocates and members who had seen constituent complaints. Finally, the committee heard HB 412 on hunting and trapping education and wildlife drug administration, which was described as a safety and modernization measure and supported by the Division of Fish and Wildlife and sportsmen’s groups, and SB 346, which would speed up Environmental Appeals Board hearings and decisions. SB 346 drew broad support from DNREC, the Nature Conservancy, the Sierra Club, and business groups, though one witness asked to clarify that Superior Court appeal rights would remain intact; DNREC confirmed they would. The committee also approved the June 10, 2026 minutes after quorum was established, and the meeting ended with a motion to adjourn and unanimous approval.

Transcript Highlights:

• State and local support by maritime businesses at the port totals about $1.2 billion in taxes.
• We do not collect taxes. So everything we do is off of our own profits.
• And we don't get any local tax dollars.
• Being that it's located on the wealthiest zip code in the United States, what do you anticipate?
• To your earlier point that it's... ...it's the wealthiest zip code in the country.

Summary: The Transportation Committee heard SB 356 by Senator Wright, which would create an opt-in framework allowing counties and municipalities to designate certain roads for utility-terrain vehicles (UTVs) under local conditions, including driver licensing, insurance, and speed-limit restrictions below 55 mph. Senator Wright said the bill would give law enforcement clearer authority and mirror the local-option approach used for golf carts. Supporters included a retired Volusia County sheriff and county commissioner, who argued UTVs are safer than golf carts and are already being used on roads, while opponents from the Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association and Honda warned that UTVs are designed for off-road use, lack federal safety standards, and pose crash and tire-blowout risks on public roads. Several senators raised safety concerns, especially about speed and crash severity, but the committee ultimately voted to report SB 356 favorably. The committee then held a lengthy discussion on seaport infrastructure and funding, beginning with a moment of silence for JaxPort COO and former FDOT employee James Bennett. FDOT presented data showing Florida’s 16 deepwater seaports generate major cargo volume, jobs, and economic impact, and described state funding programs such as FSTED, SPI, and the construction aggregate grant program. Port representatives from Port Everglades, PortMiami, Port Tampa Bay, and the Port of Palm Beach described record cargo and cruise activity, major capital projects, and the need for continued state and federal support for dredging, bulkheads, cranes, rail, and terminal expansion. Senators asked about ROI, trade shifts, intermodal connections, fuel and LNG availability, leverage and reserves, and operational risks such as flooding, sea level rise, and channel depth; port officials emphasized resiliency, private partnerships, and long-term master planning. The committee also confirmed appointees to the Tampa Hillsborough County Expressway Authority and the Tampa Port Authority in one vote, with no objection. Finally, FDOT presented the statewide mapping programs work group report required by SB 1662, explaining that coordinated statewide use of LiDAR and aerial imagery could reduce duplication, improve emergency management and planning, and support insurance and storm-damage assessment. FDOT recommended a formal statewide coordination program, shared procurement and cost-sharing agreements, dedicated staffing, and statutory updates to Chapter 334 to support interagency agreements and recurring funding.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have 1200 exemptions to Chapter 119 making the public records laws nearly as complicated as the federal
• tax code.
• establish clear guidelines on how and when these agencies must respond, so we can restore transparency as Chapter