Video & Transcript Research : 'waste characterization study'

Page 220 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fraud Committee Meeting - 2026-04-21

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We now have a robust, agency-wide approach to preventing fraud, waste, and abuse.
  • We now have a robust, agency-wide approach to preventing fraud, waste, and abuse.
  • We now have a robust, agency-wide approach to preventing fraud, waste, and abuse.
  • We now have a robust, agency-wide approach to preventing fraud, waste, and abuse.
  • ,<01:11:05.200> and prevent and detect fraud, waste, and prevent and detect fraud, waste,
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Finance Nov 18th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • When you're dumping in consolidated waste, you throw that And what we learned in this last cycle is so
  • To increase their GRT rates to fund EMS, solid waste operating systems, sewer systems, public safety,
  • We are very grateful that LFC has taken on a property tax study.
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Education Committee Apr 1st, 2026 at 09:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the faculty hired can be on a plan of study.
  • So our intent with this study, and we have Representative Richter as a lead on that study as well, is
  • So our research study is going on. It's a mixed-methods study.
  • I haven't even seen this on national studies.
  • Dual credit seems to be the big... ...study.
Keywords: 908, all
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session-Day 12, February 23, 2026-PM

Wyoming House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • to think more deeply about and and study to think more deeply about and and study in<00:33:55.080
  • c> that Uh, and studies suggest that Uh, and studies suggest that you<03:11:53.360> know,<
  • Senate File 69, Waste and Storm Water Infrastructure Study. Ayes 31. Message 163. Mr.
  • Senate file 69, waste and indicated.
  • 25.720> study.
Keywords: 916, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Health and Human Services - 01/23/25

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our Office of Inspector General is where we do program integrity work, background studies, licensing,
  • Our Office of Inspector General is where we do program integrity work, background studies, licensing,
  • Our Office of Inspector General is where we do program integrity work, background studies, licensing,
  • Our Office of Inspector General is where we do program integrity work, background studies, licensing,
  • <00:41:28.960> and hearing to uh to the fraud waste and hearing to uh to the fraud waste and
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Election Laws Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Election Laws

Transcript Highlights:
  • historically marginalized communities by expanding meaningful choices and reducing concerns about so-called wasted
  • support and by giving voters the freedom to rank the candidates they truly like without worrying about wasting
  • support by giving voters the freedom to rank the candidates they truly like without worrying about wasting
  • Voters who rank their candidates are assured their votes are not wasted.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Election Laws held a hearing on ranked choice voting, focusing primarily on Boston’s home rule petition (H. 4262) and Bedford’s petition (H. 4916). Committee chairs Dan Hunt and Senator Keenan opened the hearing, explained the three-minute testimony limit, and noted that written testimony would also be accepted. The hearing featured testimony from a wide range of supporters, including advocacy organizations, community leaders, Boston City Council members, and Bedford residents. Witnesses generally argued that ranked choice voting would produce majority-supported winners, reduce vote-splitting and negative campaigning, encourage coalition-building, and give voters more freedom to rank candidates without fear of wasting their vote. Several speakers emphasized local control and said Boston and Bedford should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to adopt the system. Others highlighted potential benefits for women, historically marginalized communities, and voter participation more broadly. Boston councilors and supporters also described the city’s local approval process and said the proposal would still require voter ratification if enacted by the legislature. No opposition testimony was presented in the excerpt. The committee took no substantive vote on the bills during the hearing; after testimony concluded, the chairs thanked participants and the committee adjourned.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • At the same time, this credit will allow us to eliminate food waste and save food products that farmers
  • Erica Parker, with Californians Against Waste, and strong support. Thank you. Thank you very much.
  • more to assess and collect tax on than the revenue they generate, increasing the threshold cuts wasteful
  • Wasteful spending on low-yield tax collection.
Summary: The Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee met after several delays while waiting for the Senate to finish its floor session, and the chair announced the committee would begin once a quorum was established. The committee then heard a series of tax-related bills, with most measures being held for suspense except SB 87, which was voted out. The chair also welcomed newly appointed committee member Assembly Member Juan Carrillo. SB 359 would clarify that county-run transit systems qualify for existing sales and use tax exemptions on transit fuels such as diesel and compressed natural gas. Senator Nilo and Placer County testified that the bill would correct an inequity affecting counties operating their own transit services, especially rural counties, and would not create a new state revenue loss because the tax had not been consistently collected. Support came from the California Transit Association and the California State Association of Counties; the bill was sent to suspense. SB 603 would allow county boards of supervisors in disaster-affected counties to extend by up to three years the five-year deadline for transferring a property tax base-year value to replacement property. The author and supporters, including the California Assessors Association and the California Association of Realtors, said the measure would give local governments flexibility to address post-disaster rebuilding delays. SB 293 would extend the deadline for filing intergenerational property transfer claims from six months to three years for disaster-impacted homeowners, with testimony focused on helping families in Altadena and preserving generational homes after the Eaton Fire; the committee discussed possible refinements and the bill was held in suspense. SB 353 would extend the farm-to-food-bank tax credit through 2032, with support emphasizing food security, waste reduction, and the program’s documented results; it too was sent to suspense. SB 723 would raise the threshold for property tax exemptions on low-value properties, with the author arguing it would reduce administrative costs and ease burdens on small businesses, and the committee asked for technical work before the bill was held in suspense. SB 785 would create a $5,000 tax credit for durable medical equipment used by children with complex medical conditions, with supporters saying it could prevent hospitalizations and help families keep medically fragile children at home; it was also sent to suspense. SB 87, which would extend the sales tax exemption for volunteer fire department fundraising activities for five more years, passed the committee on a 5-0 vote and was sent to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session - part 2 May 7th, 2025

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • upon itself and consider: is it time to eliminate the unnecessary tax on nuclear energy and nuclear waste
  • annual payments into a dedicated fund, the RDA fund, in exchange for the right to increase on-site new waste
  • So it's not a tax; it's a fee that they are paying because they are allowed to store nuclear waste at
  • Additionally, we are figuring out new approaches to waste with an anaerobic digester.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Floor Session

Arizona House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, this is a good bill, a good amendment, and I'd love if we didn't waste any more time.
  • Good bill, a good amendment, and I'd love if we didn't waste any more time. Thank you. Thank you.
  • You know, we heard a comment about wasting time. Let's be very clear.
  • The only waste of time is this bill in and of itself.
  • It's coming out party line from... ...clear the only waste of time is this bill in and of itself.
Keywords: 1182, all
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Jul 14th, 2025

Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force

Transcript Highlights:
  • Otherwise... the money will go to waste.
  • If you're doing poor maintenance, you're actually wasting a lot of money.
  • average, nationwide, over $8 billion is spent on energy in the United States, and 30% of that is wasted
  • Every year, billions are wasted nationally at schools because of undetected fault systems.
  • But how much utility waste was recognized? How much cost was wasted over that long period of time?
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Jul 21st, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • do is to push into this space, make it all from our own state, from our own funding, so we're not wasting
  • So we're going blind, and that's a waste of time and a waste of money.
  • It's a waste. It's a waste of time, a waste of money, and New Mexicans are suffering because of it.
  • We are wasting healthcare resources, we're wasting healthcare dollars, and we're losing professionals
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation (02/03/2026)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, I would suggest studying it. Um, and hopefully Representative Gison's on board with it.
  • . studied. studied.
  • We can study that further. Again, folks, we're running behind.
  • <00:45:43.760> Again,<00:45:44.160> folks, We can study that further.
  • Again, folks, We can study that further.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • immediate access to the building's keys, allowing them to enter schools within moments instead of wasting
  • 02:26.680> of lock schools within moments instead of lock schools within moments instead of wasting
  • 27.520> time<00:02:28.400> breaching<00:02:28.800> doors<00:02:29.560> or wasting
  • precious time breaching doors or wasting precious time breaching doors or waiting<00:02:29.959> for
Keywords: 1183, house
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities

Transcript Highlights:
  • One of my major efforts has been in a research study called the Vision of Preschoolers study, originally
  • And we decided to file a bill to study this to see what's going on.
  • I'm an advocate who studies human rights abuses and atrocity crimes.
  • I study each one of these methods and deaths.
  • I study each one of these methods and deaths.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee held a hybrid hearing on a range of bills affecting children, families, disability rights, homelessness, and social services. Early testimony focused on H.215, which would support children experiencing homelessness by speeding access to child care vouchers and early intervention screenings. Boston officials, Horizons for Homeless Children, Head Start, pediatric and early education advocates, and families described delays in child care and early intervention, the developmental risks of homelessness, and the need for automatic referrals and faster access to services. Testimony also supported H.216, which would improve emergency housing assistance by restoring presumptive eligibility, reducing documentation barriers, extending shelter stays from six to nine months, and creating an ombudsperson; providers and legal advocates said current rules leave families sleeping in cars or outside and create unnecessary administrative hurdles. The committee also heard strong support for H.210, which would repeal the “Learn Fair” school attendance sanction that cuts cash assistance to families when children miss school. Advocates from legal aid, education, and anti-poverty organizations argued the policy is punitive, burdensome, and ineffective, disproportionately affecting low-income, disabled, and Hispanic/Latino families. Several speakers said chronic absenteeism should be addressed through supports such as family outreach, wraparound services, and school engagement rather than benefit cuts. Legislators and school officials from Salem also testified that their districts reduced absenteeism through supportive strategies, not sanctions. Additional testimony addressed children’s vision bills H.202 and H.166, with optometrists and researchers urging better screening, data systems, and treatment access to close achievement gaps caused by untreated vision problems. Senator Lovely also presented S.2714, proposing a study of discrimination in public accommodations for people with service animals. Later, testimony on H.279 supported changing social work licensure rules to remove exam requirements that speakers said disproportionately exclude multilingual candidates and candidates of color. The hearing also included testimony on bills related to the Judge Rotenberg Center and electric shock devices, with disability rights advocates opposing continued use of the devices and urging the committee to reject licensing or authorization for them. No votes or committee actions were taken during the hearing.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Education Finance - 02/11/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • If I’m thinking about secondary social studies, history classes, secondary science classes, even math
  • And then on the back end of it, I have yet to hear a teacher say, “Well, that was a waste of time.”
  • said<01:02:52.520> this<01:02:52.640> is<01:02:52.799> a<01:02:52.960> waste
  • of<01:02:53.839> my<01:02:54.160> time<01:02:54.760> no has said this is a waste
  • of my time no has said this is a waste of my time no matter<01:02:55.240> how<01:02:55.520>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Minnesota House passes the education finance bill, HF2433 5/16/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • and this mandate in the beginning because I think it's really sad that we are being given the characterization
  • I think it's really sad that we are being given the characterization that somehow we on this side of
Keywords: 1183, house
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • That's a good way to characterize it. feds I believe is is 15%. Yeah.
  • That's a good way to yeah characterize<01:09:26.880> it. You got to take the mic.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee took up HB 164, dealing with homeowners and certain service agreements tied to residential real estate. Much of the discussion focused on whether the bill should be framed as prohibiting “service agreements” or more specifically as banning “future right to listing” agreements, and whether the bill should mirror Maine’s newer law. Mike Padmore of AARP New Hampshire presented suggested edits, including clarifying that the agreements are unenforceable, striking a provision at Roman 6C, and adding language making clear that registry of deeds staff are not liable when they record documents they are statutorily required to file. Bob Quinn of the New Hampshire Association of Realtors said the bill and Maine’s law reach the same result, but he preferred simpler wording and argued the bill should not include a two-year time limit because legitimate listing agreements should not create liens at all. Members and witnesses debated whether the bill should simply make the practice illegal outright, whether the Consumer Protection Act is the right enforcement vehicle, and whether the lien-removal process should be modeled on the recent undischarged mortgage bill. A consumer protection official said the bureau supports the statute and explained that under RSA 358-A, consumers could seek damages and equitable relief to strike a lien, while also noting that the bureau often uses the Consumer Protection Act as an enforcement tool. The committee also discussed narrowing the bill to residential real estate, with the sponsor and witnesses saying the problem has been seen in residential transactions and that commercial property was not the focus. The testimony described the underlying problem as companies, often national rather than New Hampshire-based, using long-term or future listing agreements to impose liens or penalties on homeowners, sometimes in connection with estate transfers or home sales. Witnesses said legitimate real estate listings do not normally place liens on houses, but these arrangements can include hidden or unclear penalties, including a reported 3% charge on home value. No vote was taken in the excerpt, but the committee appeared to be working through possible amendments and whether to adopt Maine-style language or a simpler New Hampshire-specific approach.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (03/10/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • because most—I'm not saying absolutely everything—but the vast majority of things that could be characterized
  • I think almost all of the things that could be characterized as a constitutional violation would meet
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 313 and, on motion by Representative Perez, voted to retain the bill because members felt it needed further work and was not ready for final action. The motion passed 18-0, and no further action was taken on the bill. House Bill 391, an anti-SLAPP measure, was then discussed; supporters said it addressed a real problem and should move forward, while opponents raised concerns that it was too broad, could affect criminal cases, and might create procedural complications. The committee voted 18-0 to retain HB 391 as well, and it was placed on consent. The committee next considered House Bill 462, establishing a cause of action for unwarranted video imaging of residential properties. Representative McFarland moved OTP, saying the bill raised First Amendment and property-rights concerns. The motion passed 18-0, and the bill was also placed on consent. The committee then turned to House Bill 509, which would require reporting on forfeitures. Supporters argued the information was useful for future legislation, while opponents said the reporting would be costly, duplicative, and potentially split data across fiscal years. The committee voted 11-7 to recommend OTP, with a minority of members opposed. House Bill 520, authorizing Department of Education hearing officers to issue subpoenas, drew the most extended debate. Supporters argued DOE needed the same tools other agencies have, while opponents said DOE already had access to needed information, the Attorney General could handle subpoenas, and the bill would create an unbalanced process and raise due process and student-record concerns. Representative Tur offered Amendment 0842H to shift subpoena power from DOE hearing officers to the Attorney General; after debate, the amendment failed 10-8. The transcript cuts off as the committee begins the roll call on the underlying bill after rejecting the amendment.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 1/23/25

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Paul Schnell, who is now commissioner, Drew Evans, who is now the BCA superintendent, was characterized
  • > the<01:24:12.679> BCA superintendent<01:24:16.600> was<01:24:16.920> characterized
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee approved the January 21 minutes and then heard an overview from the University of Minnesota’s Office for Public Engagement on its community engagement awards program. Amber Cameron explained that the office supports partnerships across the university’s campuses and that nominations for the Outstanding Community Service Awards were evaluated by faculty and staff selection committees using criteria such as positive societal impact, innovation, extraordinary results, and overall application quality. She said the community partner award was based only on the nomination materials and described the award process, including that nominations could come from individuals, grassroots groups, or organizations and that the award carried a $5,000 prize. The main discussion focused on the 2024 community partner award given to Communities United Against Police Brutality. Cameron said the nomination documented a long-standing relationship with the university through the Center for Community-Engaged Learning, including work in 130 course offerings over 24 years across 17 academic departments and participation by about 1,000 students. She cited examples from the nomination such as student research and policy work that contributed to Travis’s Law. Committee members questioned the organization’s age, its letterhead and public activism, the meaning of its relationship with the university, and whether the work was appropriate for an award. Cameron responded that the award did not require formal tax status and that her office facilitated the process rather than judging the organization’s broader views. Members also asked for additional information on the vetting process, the courses involved, the award funding source, the ceremony, and related materials. Cameron said the awards were funded through OMN funding, that the program was being sunset and replaced with a new internal engaged-scholar awards structure, and that she would follow up on requests for documents, speaking notes, and other details. No votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes, and the committee moved on after the testimony and questions.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • amount of fraud taking those dollars, spending them, and taking those dollars for personal things, wasting
  • the public, there is a risk that unverified tips could send the Department down rabbit holes that waste
  • these rabbit sending the Department down these rabbit holes<00:09:33.680> that<00:09:33.840> waste
  • lot<00:09:34.320> of<00:09:34.400> taxpayer<00:09:34.800> time holes that waste
  • a lot of taxpayer time holes that waste a lot of taxpayer time and<00:09:35.080> money and money
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 5040, the “Take It Back Act,” presented by Representative Anderson. The bill, as amended by the DE1 amendment, would impose a 100% tax on amounts a person is convicted of stealing through fraud against Minnesota public programs, with the stated goal of recovering taxpayer dollars. Anderson said the measure is bipartisan, has many co-authors, and was developed with the Department of Revenue to ensure it could be administered without undue burden. Joanna Bears of the Department of Revenue testified in support of the bill’s administration and thanked the authors for working with the department. She explained that the bill has two parts: a conviction-based tax that would be assessed after a fraud conviction, and a penalty piece tied to fraud identified through the department’s existing review and tip processes. In response to member questions, Bears said the department already receives tips and information from other agencies, reviews them carefully, and would use the bill as another tool to address public fund fraud. Members also asked about timing, restitution, and whether the bill could be misused by bad-faith tips; Anderson and Bears said the conviction-based portion is not tip-driven and that the bill is intended to be administered legally and efficiently. Representative Smith asked about the relationship to the Fraud Restitution Fund and whether the bill would apply to private-sector tax fraud. Bears said restitution would likely be collected first depending on statutory priority, and clarified that the new 100% penalty would apply only to public fund fraud, not general tax fraud, and only to the fraudulent public-fund amount. Representative Witty and others expressed support for the bill as a tool to combat fraud. At the end of the hearing, Representative Anderson renewed her motion to lay over House File 5040, as amended, for possible inclusion in the omnibus tax bill, and the chair indicated that was the plan.