Transcript Highlights:

• <00:24:06.000> recall expungement and bench warrant recall expungement and bench warrant recall
• Trust is built by ensuring judicial independence, which is critical to protecting the rule of law.
• Hawaii has a merit-based system of judicial selection and retention.
• has a merit-based system of judicial has a merit-based system of judicial selection<00:36:18.160
• system which promotes both judicial system which promotes both judicial Independence<00:36:22.760

Keywords: House Agenda:, 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there a warrant involved? Chairperson. Thank you, Mr.
• At some point, you need a warrant. Does this not rise to that level?
• We are now on House Bill 182, judicial retirement changes.
• position and receive some portion of the Judicial Retirement Act.
• So we're in a position now of never having solvency in the judicial retirement plan.

Transcript Highlights:

• Many jurisdictions across the country allow geofence warrants with judicial oversight and constitutional
• Many jurisdictions across the country allow geofence warrants with judicial oversight and constitutional
• Many jurisdictions across the country allow geofence warrants with judicial oversight and constitutional
• warrant? warrant?
• that warrants on top of warrants to get that warrants on top of warrants to get that information.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill does not get rid of judicial warrants.
• will still be under an obligation to adhere to those judicial warrants once this bill passes.
• This bill does not get rid of judicial warrants.
• will still be under an obligation to adhere to those judicial warrants once this bill passes.
• those judicial warrants once this bill passes.

Keywords: House streaming session for Thursday, February 12, 2026, 957, house, all

Summary: The House convened with 124 members present, opened with prayer, and approved the previous day’s journal. Members then adopted a congratulatory House resolution honoring the Kent Island High School boys lacrosse team for winning the 2025 Maryland Class 2A state championship. The House also journalized Baltimore City 2026 bond/loan authorization resolutions and moved a series of introductory House bills and bond initiatives through first reading and committee referral without objection. On the special order calendar, House Bill 28, concerning higher education/private career schools advertising, received a favorable report and was ordered printed for third reading. House Bill 226, creating a Department of Disabilities housing programs and affiliated foundations structure, was also reported favorably as amended. Two floor amendments were adopted to that bill: one clarifying that any affiliated foundation may only raise funds or provide support and may not run programs or set policy, and another restoring conflict-of-interest and ethics protections, including limits on family members and public ethics application requirements. A later amendment to HB 226 was rejected by a recorded vote of 95 in the negative, and the bill was ordered printed for third reading. The most extended debate centered on House Bill 229, which increases the Maryland Transportation Authority’s revenue bond limit from $4 billion to $5 billion to help finance the Francis Scott Key Bridge rebuild. One amendment sought to prohibit toll increases without General Assembly approval; its sponsor argued the added borrowing would likely lead to future toll hikes and that elected representatives should vote on them. The floor leader opposed the amendment, saying it would weaken MDTA’s independent rate-setting authority, harm its bond rating, and increase financing costs, while noting the bill is intended to cover bridge reconstruction costs and federal reimbursement timing. After debate, the amendment failed on a recorded vote, and HB 229 was ordered printed for third reading.

Transcript Highlights:

• When we talk about the indiscriminate arrests, we do not intend to stop a judicial warrant to be executed
• intend to stop a judicial warrant to be executed by an ICE agent or anyone else.
• Immigration officers who do not carry judicial warrants, unlike our deputized criminal law enforcement
• The bill requires that agents present a valid judicial warrant signed by a judge and clearly identify
• All the bill asks is this: If you want to make an arrest near a courthouse, get a judicial warrant.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They say that non-judicial warrants are satisfactory.
• Supreme Court cases have upheld the need for judicial warrants and have held that a non-judicial warrant
• internal ICE memo that said no judicial internal ICE memo that said no judicial warrant<01:37:25.760
• non-judicial warrants are satisfactory. non-judicial warrants are satisfactory.
• <01:37:43.520> warrants upheld the need for judicial warrants upheld the need for judicial

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• search warrants.
• Three separate warrants are Three separate warrants are required.
• Judicial search warrants are required just to identify a single individual.
• Platforms must acknowledge search warrants within eight hours...
• But existing law already allows emergency warrants and exigent...

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > reserved the judicial functions are reserved the judicial functions are reserved through<00:
• <01:09:33.359> So warrant, but not all of them do. So warrant, but not all of them do.
• <01:16:16.560> or we would need to uh secure a warrant or we would need to uh secure a warrant
• And then getting a warrant. To get door. And then getting a warrant.
• <01:31:03.360> a we would stop type the search warrant a we would stop type the search warrant

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You have to get a judicial warrant for that. There is a process.
• You can get a warrant, go to the court, and get a judicial warrant issued by an Article 3 judge in order
• And the last thing that I would say, two words: judicial warrant.
• As we continue to say, there is something called a judicial warrant that we all know law enforcement
• heard from some of my colleagues about a written warrant, judicial warrant.

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate opened with routine proceedings, approval of the prior day’s journal, and several motions to restore previously passed bills to the third-reading calendar. Senate Print 2436A, an amendment to the Administrative Code of New York City, and Senate Print 7160, an amendment to the Elder Law, were both reconsidered and restored to the calendar by roll call. Amendments were also received on Senate Print 9960, which retained its place on the third-reading calendar. The chamber then paused to honor Madeline Wilson on her 100th birthday and Marilyn D. Mosley through previously adopted resolutions, with family members and guests recognized on the floor. The Senate also welcomed Columbia Kicks Cancer, a student-run East Greenbush fundraising team that raised more than $239,000 for blood cancer research and care. The Finance Committee reported Senate Print 9005C, a budget bill amending Chapter 268 of the Laws of 1996, directly to third reading, and the Senate accepted the report and the message of necessity. The bill was then taken up on the controversial calendar, leading to extended debate on Part LL, which focused on limits on state and local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, including 287(g) agreements, informal cooperation, masking rules for law enforcement, sensitive locations such as polling places, and the creation of an Office of Immigration Trust within the Attorney General’s office. Supporters argued the bill would keep state and municipal employees focused on their own duties, protect constitutional rights, and prevent New York resources from being used for federal immigration enforcement; they also said it would not bar all cooperation or prevent local police from responding to crime. Opponents argued it would hinder public safety, restrict law enforcement cooperation, and interfere with local discretion, while some raised concerns about constitutional issues and the practical effects on sheriffs, county jails, and police agencies. The debate also included a separate provision creating a civil cause of action for constitutional-rights violations by federal, state, or local officials, which supporters described as an accountability measure. Members further discussed the masking section, with supporters saying it applied broadly to officials and was intended to withstand constitutional scrutiny, while opponents cited a recent Ninth Circuit ruling striking down a similar California law. The Office of Immigration Trust and its complaint/referral process were also examined, including the role of the Governor and the State Education Department in reviewing alleged violations. No final vote on the controversial calendar bill was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• warrants, requires proper judicial warrants, requires proper judicial warrants, identifications,<
• <00:14:55.360> warrant,<00:14:55.920> and having a valid judicial warrant, and having
• a valid judicial warrant, and receiving<00:14:56.560> approval<00:14:57.040> from<00:14
• Do they have a warrant? Then they can have access. Do they have a judicial warrant?
• Do they have a warrant? Then they can have access. Do they have a judicial warrant?

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: House File 3435 was moved before the committee and, after an author’s DE1 amendment was offered and adopted, the bill was sent to the general register. The bill, as described by Co-Chair Jordan, would limit immigration enforcement on school grounds unless agents present a judicial warrant, identification, and notify school leadership; supporters said it is intended to create clear separation between ICE/DHS activity and schools while preserving local law enforcement responses to other emergencies. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support of the bill. School leaders, teachers, union representatives, and Education Minnesota’s general counsel argued that immigration enforcement near schools has caused fear, absenteeism, disrupted operations, and serious mental health harms for students and staff. Several witnesses described students carrying passports or birth certificates, families keeping children home, and schools shifting large numbers of students to virtual learning. Speakers from districts in the Twin Cities and greater Minnesota said the presence of ICE or federal agents near schools and bus stops has undermined attendance, trust, and the ability to teach and learn. Witnesses also emphasized that the bill would provide needed clarity for educators and administrators about how to respond if federal agents come to school property. Some speakers framed the issue as protecting all children and families, including immigrant and refugee communities, and said schools should remain safe, stable places focused on education rather than immigration enforcement. No opposition testimony or committee vote beyond adoption of the DE1 amendment and the motion to place the bill on the general register was shown in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so that's a judicial branch function.
• But if the bill requires a judicial officer to sign a citation, then it's forcing a judicial officer
• To the point, if a judge forgets to sign a search warrant, is it still a legal search warrant?
• But a warrant is a judicial branch function. A citation is an executive branch function. Well, Mr.
• error, just like not signing a search warrant is a judicial error.

Bills: HB2056, HB2057, HB2224, HB2257, HB2265, HB2311, HB2352, HB2367, HB2369, HB2446, HB2532, HB2592, HB2752, HB2809, HB2957

Keywords: brackish water, groundwater, desalination, water resources, feasibility study, environmental impact, special plates, centennial, Arizona Department of Transportation, vehicle registration, commercial discounts, Arizona Centennial, produce incentive, agriculture, economic support, funding, Arizona, boating, watercraft licensing, law enforcement

Transcript Highlights:

• An ICE warrant is not a real warrant.
• It may say it's a warrant, but it is not a real warrant. A judge did not sign off on that warrant.
• Just because a warrant is issued and executed does not mean that the subject of that ICE warrant is..
• , what's a judicial warrant, what are criminal proceedings, and what are civil proceedings.
• It's been made clear before, but I just want to clarify that ICE warrants are administrative warrants

Bills: HB1320, HB2012, HB2293, HB2655, HB3174, HB4108, HB4661, HB4799, HB5534, HB5580

Keywords: transportation, infrastructure, funding, state budget, public safety, child welfare, county boards, membership, local governance, public welfare, government service, social services, Texas Family Code, regulation, vendors, solicitors, roadside sales, county authority, Sweeny Hospital District, board of directors

Transcript Highlights:

• Supreme Court case, Missouri, the McNeely requires the use to obtain a search warrant.
• Typically a search warrant best practice.
• Investigators must go through judicial process while part which protects privacy, but they can delay
• Then law enforcement can collect evidence from the body without a warrant.
• Just because you have a warrant to get the toxicology on that person.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, this bill ensures that the BCA receives necessary information in order to protect from the judicial
• But in some instances, there are also reports that during some of the hearings, the judicial officer
• But in some instances, there are also reports that the during some of the hearings, the judicial officer
• I certainly hope and trust actually that our judicial officers are not so subjective and loosey-goosey
• >> Our judicial officers are not so subjective and Lucy QC that they would take a hypothetical

Bills: HF3489, HF3990, HF3825, HF3826, HF3827, HF3822

Keywords: grooming, child protection, student safety, sexual exploitation, educator licensing, teacher discipline, mandatory reporting, mandated reporter training, school misconduct, predatory offender, child abuse, sexual abuse, sex trafficking, child sexual abuse material, child pornography, position of authority, school employee, school administrator, license revocation, license suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• SB 1650 stipulates that this judicial immunity does not apply if the function was completed by a judicial
• Judicial decisions, findings, or opinions.
• The police have a judicially issued arrest warrant.
• The person, there’s a judicial warrant for a rapist in the back room of a restaurant.
• , that person knows that there's a judicial warrant specifically for that person... ...that would absolutely

Bills: SB1067, SB1234, SB1285, SB1295, SB1392, SB1413, SB1436, SB1470, SB1476, SB1489, SB1512, SB1535, SB1540, SB1556, SB1568, SB1569, SB1570, SB1573, SB1585, SB1609, SB1627, SB1634, SB1635, SB1644, SB1647, SB1648, SB1650, SB1653, SB1654, SB1655, SB1656, SB1657, SB1658, SB1661, SB1662, SB1664, SB1666, SB1667, SB1669, SB1709, SB1720, SB1723, SB1725, SB1743, SB1746, SB1748, SB1755, SB1786, SB1820, SB1822, SB1829, SCR1027, SCR1040, SCR1048

Keywords: tax lien, property tax lien, real property tax lien, foreclosure, right of redemption, redeem, excess proceeds, county abatement lien, abatement lien, lien priority, assessment lien, easement, county treasurer, certificate of purchase, tax delinquency, delinquent property taxes, property owner equity, judgment foreclosure, title report, Arizona Revised Statutes

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:18:12.240> and situations with search warrants and situations with search warrants and
• . warrant. warrant.
• They don't need to go get warrants.
• They don't need to go get warrants.
• <00:49:34.000> oversight judicial oversight judicial oversight with<00:49:36.319> regard

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• When we talk about the indiscriminate arrests, we do not intend to stop a judicial warrant from being
• intend to stop a judicial warrant to be executed by an ICE agent or anyone else.
• Officers who do not carry judicial warrants, unlike our deputized criminal law enforcement officers.
• The bill requires that agents present a valid judicial warrant signed by a judge and clearly identify
• All the bill asks is this: If you want to make an arrest near a courthouse, get a judicial warrant.

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on civil rights, housing, public safety, and administrative process. Early items included SB 46, which would authorize the Secretary of State to remove constitutionally ineligible presidential and vice presidential candidates from California ballots; SB 1078, requiring notice to the Civil Rights Department when court filings involve civil rights violations; SB 989, expanding access to Care Court by letting first responders refer cases through county behavioral health agencies; SB 998, clarifying and expanding discrimination prevention coordinators in the new Office of Civil Rights; SB 1146, requiring disclosure for AI-generated health advertisements and giving physicians a limited private right of action; SB 1164, a California Voting Rights Act expansion responding to federal voting-rights rulings; SB 1256, a housing bill aimed at limiting repeated litigation over the Harmony Grove Village South project; SB 1267, addressing HOA liability and indemnification for EV charger installations; and SB 1425, authorizing an encroachment permit program for high-speed rail right-of-way management. The committee also later heard SB 873, restricting ICE arrests near courthouses, and SB 1160, requiring eviction data reporting by zip code. Most bills drew support from sponsors, advocacy groups, labor organizations, or local officials, while opposition centered on concerns about county workload, due process, fire safety, civil liberties, or the scope of the policy changes. Members generally expressed support for the bills while noting unresolved issues and the need for amendments or further stakeholder work, especially on SB 1164, SB 1256, SB 1267, SB 1425, and SB 1160. The Judicial Council opposed SB 1160 because of the burden of adding zip-code reporting to court systems, while the author and supporters argued the data would help target eviction-prevention efforts. SB 873 drew strong support from public defenders, immigrant-rights groups, and court-related stakeholders, with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department opposing. SB 989 drew support from firefighters and family advocates, while Disability Rights California opposed, arguing Care Court is too costly and diverts resources from community-based services. SB 1164 received broad civil-rights and voting-rights support, with cities opposing unless amended over definitions, cure periods, and litigation risk. SB 1256 drew support from housing and labor interests and opposition from local residents and environmental groups concerned about fire safety and evacuation. SB 1267 was supported by the HOA and utility stakeholders after amendments addressing liability concerns. After quorum was established, the committee voted to pass a consent calendar and then approved the listed bills, sending them to the appropriate committees or to Appropriations, including SB 46, SB 873, SB 989, SB 998, SB 1078, SB 1146, SB 1164, SB 1256, SB 1267, and SB 1425. The transcript ends with SB 1160 still under discussion, with members indicating support for the bill’s goals but acknowledging the Judicial Council’s implementation concerns and the need for further work.

Transcript Highlights:

• district attorneys in each of the judicial districts.
• Because the judicial system is central to public safety.
• The district attorney is at the center of the whole judicial system.
• Because the judicial system is central to public safety. the The judicial system is central to public
• The district attorney is at the center of the whole judicial system.

Bills: HR252, HR253, HR254, HR255, HR256, HCR103, HCR104, HR244, HR245, HR246, HR247, HR248, HR249, HR250, HR251, HCR101, HCR102, SCR40, SCR60, SB112, SB131, SB145, SB194, SB268, SB307, SB312, SB319, SB333, SB341, SB346, SB464, SB466, SB488, SB495, SB503, SB507, SB509, HR9, HR196, HCR27, HCR28, HCR50, HCR62, HCR67, HCR71, HCR78, HCR81, SCR20, HB123, HB251, HB625, HB662, HB709, HB769, HB775, HB783, HB895, HB1011, HB1057, HB1155, HB1186, HB1224, HB1245, HB1247, HB1253, HB1254, HB1255, HB1256, SB8, SB10, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB14, SB16, SB17, SB18, SB20, SB21, SB22, SB40, SB48, SB55, SB69, SB75, SB77, SB78, SB85, SB102, SB115, SB133, SB140, SB148, SB151, SB165, SB169, SB170, SB185, SB197, SB200, SB217, SB235, SB278, SB280, SB291, SB300, SB303, SB315, SB324, SB330, SB411, SB416, SB420, SB436, SB438, SB449, SB455, SB456, SB477, SB489, SB521, SB97, SB105, HR171, HCR49, HCR65, HCR72, HR37, HCR64, HR170, HR191, HR206, HR207, HR208, HR217, HCR11, HCR53, HCR60, HCR66, HCR68, SCR19, SCR3, SCR6, SCR18, SCR11, SCR22, SCR2, HCR6, HB64, HB68, HB92, HB130, HB258, HB633, HB801, HB61, HB98, HB102, HB139, HB142, HB170, HB185, HB194, HB199, HB231, HB247, HB294, HB336, HB474, HB661, HB842, HB852, HB66, HB153, HB165, HB326, HB387, HB455, HB513, HB603, HB660, HB719, HB762, HB766, HB802, HB816, HB833, HB940, HB950, HB975, HB1028, HB1039, HB1051, HB1053, HB1080, HB1201, HB1215, HB1228, HB1251, HB1252, SB1, SB23, SB32, SB42, SB43, SB46, SB51, SB110, SB113, SB150, SB154, SB161, SB218, SB220, SB221, SB253, SB289, SB310, SB351, SB399, SB404, SB502, SB26, SB28, SB29, SB30, SB41, SB44, SB64, SB84, SB87, SB93, SB98, SB107, SB118, SB142, SB192, SB195, SB199, SB219, SB222, SB234, SB241, SB255, SB275, SB277, SB292, SB294, SB306, SB314, SB482, HCR32, HB798, HB998, HB1084, HB1223, HB59, HB955, HB1191, HB1234, HB646, HB824, HB341, SB397, SB442, HB901, HB79, HR20, HR74, HB284, HB306, HB366, HB393, HB458, HB577, HB582, HB605, HB614, HB682, HB733, HB752, HB773, HB911, HB926, HB996, HB1035, HB1069, HB1113, HB1140, HB1180, HB1240, SB47, SB82, SB89, SB149, SB382

Keywords: consumer protection, credit card fees, cash transactions, rounding practices, transparency, low-income, economic impact, residential construction, building codes, inspection practices, housing costs, task force, HR254, House Resolution 254, Ty Hebert, Acadiana Legislative Delegation, Louisiana State University, LSU, graduation, commendation

Summary: The House met with a quorum, opened with prayer and the pledge, adopted the journal, and received a large number of Senate messages, committee reports, and bill referrals. Members also introduced several resolutions and recognized guests, including students from Allen Parish, federal appointees Brandon Beach and Paul Hollis, and other visitors. The chamber then moved through a lengthy agenda of House and Senate measures, with many bills and resolutions reported favorably, amended, or referred to committee. Among the notable floor actions, the House adopted H.R. 32 urging the Port of New Orleans to obtain backup motors for the St. Claude Avenue Bridge. It also passed bills on a wide range of topics, including local court and ordinance procedures for Alexandria, prohibiting reporting criminal fines and fees to credit bureaus, veterans’ lottery benefits, police chief residency in Tickfaw, fire marshal plan review authority, expanding the definition of first responder to include public works employees, NIL protections for student athletes, salary increases and additional positions for assistant district attorneys, limiting OMV debt referrals for unpaid reinstatement fees, watershed restoration and flood control funding, a sexual assault survivor task force, elderly consumer protection education, recreation of the Public Service Commission, Medicaid reimbursement for non-emergency medical transportation, local sales tax audit procedures, alcoholic beverage definitions for salons and similar businesses, transfer of removed monuments to state park property, hearing aid dealer regulation updates, a permit fee for small in-state distillers, expanded city court jurisdiction in Avoyelles Parish, and a narrowed version of the Alexandria administrative adjudication bill. Several measures were amended on the floor before passage, including the Alexandria ordinance bill, the sales tax audit bill, the alcohol/beverage bill, and the monument transfer bill. The House also temporarily returned some bills to the calendar for later consideration. Most measures passed overwhelmingly, though House Bill 153 on criminal court debt reporting passed with 67 yeas and 18 nays, House Bill 660 on assistant district attorney salaries passed 94-1, House Bill 719 on additional ADA positions passed 95-0, House Bill 883 on the sexual assault task force passed 86-2, House Bill 1028 on non-emergency medical transportation passed 81-15, and House Bill 1215 on monuments passed 78-14.

Transcript Highlights:

• warrants but administrative documents that ICE agents.
• for and we want you to serve that warrant on them.'
• They do train a deputy who serves a warrant. They don't contact ICE." ICE contacts them.
• So, in this Curry County hypothetical, please take this warrant and deliver it.
• , went and served the warrant.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then there is judicial diversion where a judge can offer a non-violent offender an alternative.
• decisions and so that's why judicial education is important I am meeting with at the state level with
• These warrants allow for the thorough investigation of both the digital and physical premises.
• Each warrant requires weeks of preparation in order to serve. Serve them safely and legally.
• Without the proper staffing of a full team, residential search warrants could not be served.

Keywords: 988, house, all