Transcript Highlights:

• The federal... ...of dollars in voucher funds every single year.
• to fund scholarships.
• to fund scholarships.
• to fund students in Arizona.
• to fund students in Arizona.

Summary: The House opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, guest introductions, and several proclamations and recognitions, including Arizona’s hosting of the NCAA Women’s Basketball Final Four, Autism Awareness Day, Farm Worker Day, and Passover observances. Members also welcomed guests from the Arizona Psychiatric Society, Tucson International Airport, Autism Bringing Change, and others. No substantive debate occurred during these ceremonial items, and the House later noted the Doctor of the Day and approved the prior journal. The chamber then moved through Committee of the Whole consideration of several Senate bills. SB 1024, SB 1078, SB 1123, SB 1164, SB 1232, SB 1293, SB 1493 as amended, SB 1520, SB 1572, and SB 1160 as amended all received do-pass recommendations, while SB 1665 was retained on the calendar. Debate centered most heavily on SB 1142, a federal scholarship tax credit conformity bill, with supporters arguing it would allow Arizona students to benefit from an existing federal tax credit and opponents warning it would divert public resources to private schools and expand voucher-like programs without accountability. SB 1293 drew debate over GPLET property tax abatements and whether the bill would protect school district revenues or hinder housing and economic development. SB 1572 also prompted discussion over civics instruction and whether it imposed an unfunded mandate on schools. On third reading, the House passed SB 1097, SB 1166, SB 1216, and SB 1787. SB 1787 passed on a 31-24 vote after debate over municipal and county development and due process. The House also adopted a floor amendment to SB 1160 before passing it as amended, with supporters framing it as a public safety measure for drone restrictions near venues and opponents raising constitutional and drafting concerns. The House then adopted the Committee of the Whole reports, properly engrossed the measures, and adjourned until Thursday, April 2, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• Someone can claim a tax credit that will then fund scholarships.
• to fund scholarships.
• to fund scholarships.
• to fund students in Arizona.
• The residential property tax assessment ratio has stayed at 10%.

Transcript Highlights:

• Motor Carrier Permit Fund.
• federal funds.
• is generally split up 86% general funds, 14% highway tax distribution funds.
• save on general funds and SIF funds.
• It's all special funded.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a quorum present, then approved journal corrections and recognized visiting students from Underwood School. The chamber also handled several conference committee appointments after failing to concur with Senate amendments on House bills 1022, 1049, 1229, and 1029, and after the Senate failed to concur on House amendments to Senate bills 2010 and 2113. The House then concurred in or passed a series of amended measures, including House Bills 1481 (dental insurance loss ratio and reporting), 1511 (physician guidance on abortion law, with an emergency clause), 1562 (mandated reporter training), 1197 (correctional facilities study), 1095 (child protective services liaison work group), 1317 (barber licensing board changes), 1549 (corrections facility grants and reentry-related provisions), 1354 (appraiser evaluations), 1374 (open meeting exemption for township supervisors during on-site inspections), 1355 (abbreviated notice for administrative rulemaking), 1025 (advanced nuclear energy study), 1470 (Game and Fish fee changes), 1592 (Lignite Research Council updates), and 1375 (alcohol service/photo ID provisions). Final passage votes were recorded on each bill, with most passing comfortably and some drawing notable opposition, especially HB 1470 and HB 1549. The House spent substantial time on Senate Bill 2011, the Highway Patrol appropriation. Members discussed shifting one-time funding from the general fund to the Electronic Motor Carrier Permit Fund, including body armor, preliminary breath tests, an emergency vehicle course, resurfacing, fleet costs, and handgun/taser replacement, while also noting a federal grant and no new FTEs. Questions focused on salary-line increases and the new-and-vacant FTE pool, with Appropriations explaining that those dollars had been moved back into agency budgets from OMB. The bill passed 84-6. The House also passed Senate Bill 2013, the Commissioner of University and School Lands appropriation, after discussion of Trust Lands operations, unclaimed property staffing, and distributions from the Common Schools Trust Fund; one member was excused for a conflict, and the bill passed 67-22. Senate Bill 2023, the Racing Commission appropriation, passed 65-25 after a brief explanation of the agency’s responsibilities and funding. A major policy debate centered on Senate Bill 2385, which revises mobile home park regulation. Supporters said it creates receivership procedures if a license is revoked, requires clearer tenant notices, limits certain fees, and strengthens protections against eviction and utility overcharges. Two members were excused from voting due to conflicts tied to mobile home park ownership, and the bill passed 84-4. Another extended debate occurred on Senate Bill 2159, which allows the State Energy Research Center to study nuclear-related projects with approval from the Industrial Commission and consultation with the radioactive waste advisory council. Supporters said it is meant to help study advanced nuclear energy while preserving existing prohibitions on high-level radioactive waste storage; opponents raised concerns that the language could weaken prior protections and open the door to waste-related research or storage. The transcript ends during that debate, before a final vote on SB 2159 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• When you look at the ratios of either one to three or one to four in state-funded center-based programs
• When you look at the ratios of either one to three or one to four in state-funded center-based programs
• funds, which is $568,000 in General Fund in 2026-27, and then a little less, $925,000 General Fund ongoing
• City-County funding.
• City County funding.

Summary: The committee heard a lengthy budget hearing focused on child care, child welfare, and immigration-related services, with most of the discussion centered on child care funding, slot utilization, and rate reform. Department of Social Services officials said the Governor’s budget would provide $6.8 billion for child care programs in 2026-27, including $11.5 million in Prop. 64 funds for mini-grants to licensed facilities affected by 2025 disasters. They also described federal CCDF and Prop. 64 revenue reductions that would reduce general child care funding by about 4,176 slots, while emphasizing that the cuts should not affect currently enrolled children. The LAO supported aligning spending with lower revenues and asked for more detail on the disaster grant program. Members questioned why so many awarded slots remain uncontracted or unfilled, and DSS said delays are largely due to providers building new infrastructure, licensing, staffing, and enrollment work. One senator criticized the repeated explanation, argued unspent funds revert to the General Fund instead of being redirected to child care, and urged shifting more funding from contract slots to vouchers and increasing flexibility for infrastructure and expansion costs. DSS said it is exploring more flexibility, better readiness screening, and quicker redistribution of relinquished slots. The committee also discussed the Emergency Child Care Bridge program, with DSS saying it can redistribute funds among counties to avoid disenrolling children. A second panel addressed the state’s broader commitment to expand child care and move toward a single rate structure. DSS reported that since 2021-22 nearly 125,000 new slots have been awarded across CCTR, CAPP, CMAP, and the Emergency Child Care Bridge program, bringing monthly service levels to more than 366,700 children. The department and CDE described progress on rate reform, including completion of the alternative methodology and joint recommendations from the labor-management committee on a single-rate framework. County and provider testimony emphasized persistent unmet need, especially for infant and toddler care, and argued that current reimbursement disparities between CDSS-funded programs and state preschool create inequities and discourage expansion. Stanislaus County Office of Education said rate differences can materially affect local program revenue and staffing, while Parent Voices California described the child care system as difficult to navigate and inequitable, especially for Black families and survivors of domestic violence. The California Budget and Policy Center argued that only a small share of eligible children are served, that Universal TK has concentrated investment in school-based settings, and that providers are still paid far below the cost of care. Members pressed the administration for deadlines on automation and implementation of the single-rate structure, and DSS said some work can proceed before collective bargaining concludes, though policy decisions are still needed. The committee also reviewed several trailer bill proposals. For the COLA, DSS proposed applying the 2026-27 increase through cost-of-care-plus payments, but acknowledged it had inadvertently excluded CalWORKs Child Care and the Emergency Child Care Bridge from the initial calculation; the LAO recommended making the COLA increase uniform across child care and state preschool programs. On the alternative methodology survey, DSS proposed replacing the market rate survey with the federally approved alternative methodology and aligning the timing with the federal CCDF state plan cycle. On licensed family child care homes, DSS proposed limiting temporary absences to 20% of monthly care hours and allowing more flexibility for medical appointments, jury duty, training, and union activities. On excessive unexplained absences, DSS proposed a statutory definition to align state policy with federal rules allowing disenrollment after 30 days of unexplained absences. The committee also discussed a proposal to require contractors to collect family fees directly so the full voucher value reaches providers, with DSS saying it is working with Riverside County on implementation and CDE asking that the same policy apply to state preschool. Finally, the committee reviewed an Early Childhood Policy Council reappropriation and reporting proposal, with DSS explaining that prior funds were underused because participation costs are hard to estimate and that additional staffing and contractor support would be needed for the expanded annual report requirements.

Transcript Highlights:

• Some of these are funded through, for example, H-Sync, which is a Commerce-funded program.
• Now let's jump into funding. County funding. Maybe about five more minutes.
• Now let's jump into funding. county funding. Maybe about five.
• funding breakdown between state and local.
• WISP has a menu that we're required to use, and as of '24, with this funding and our block grant funding

Committee: House Early Learning & Human Services

Summary: The committee held a work session on juvenile rehabilitation capacity, services, staffing, and related county and early learning issues. DCYF Assistant Secretary Jennifer Redmond described Green Hill School, Echo Glen, Harbor Heights, community facilities, and community transition services, emphasizing that JR is operating above safe capacity, that long adult sentences and limited placement options are driving overcrowding, and that staffing, programming space, contraband control, and safety are all affected. She said Harbor Heights has opened as a short-term step-down facility, a new behavior management system has reduced law-enforcement referrals and use-of-force incidents, and staffing and injuries have improved somewhat, though Green Hill remains well above its safe operating capacity. Members asked about success metrics, developmental disabilities, mental health needs, college access at Echo Glen, future capacity planning, and a proposed mental health facility; Redmond said JR is seeking additional resources and is reviewing broader capacity options, including Mission Creek. The committee then heard from Team Child and youth advocate Gisela Gonzalez about the youth perspective. They argued that success should be measured by access to education, mental health care, family connection, safety, and community reintegration, not just confinement. They said community transition services and community facilities are underused, criticized sentence extensions and new criminal referrals from JR to Lewis County, and raised concerns about limited phone and visitation access, delayed or inadequate mental health treatment, lack of college opportunities for young women at Echo Glen, and the treatment of youth with disabilities. Gonzalez described her own experiences in county and state facilities, saying she felt mistreated, undereducated, and unable to access therapy without first reporting suicidal ideation. Members asked follow-up questions about telehealth, county-versus-state services, and educational access. The final major presentation came from juvenile court administrators Christine Simon Smeyer and Judge Rachel Anderson on county-level juvenile court services. They outlined the juvenile court continuum from prevention and truancy work through diversion, detention, and community supervision, stressing that courts aim to keep youth out of detention whenever possible and use evidence-based, trauma-informed, and restorative practices. Clark County was used as an example of a court with restorative justice programming, school partnerships, behavioral health probation, detention alternatives, and specialized supports such as a psychologist, educational advocates, and family-centered services. They also discussed funding, saying county juvenile court services are heavily dependent on local dollars, with state support averaging about 21 percent across courts, and warned that recent cuts to early intervention funding reduced staffing and services even though the need remained. Members asked about detention for status offenses, supports for youth with developmental disabilities, and restorative justice practices. The meeting concluded with DCYF Assistant Secretary Nicole Rose and Head Start/ECAP representative Katie Warren discussing early learning and child care. Rose said Fair Start for Kids Act investments increased child care access, provider participation, and kindergarten readiness, but recent budget reductions will raise co-pays for many families, delay eligibility expansions, reduce ECAP slots, eliminate some provider supports, and cut infant and early childhood mental health consultation capacity. Warren said ECAP remains an important two-generation anti-poverty and workforce-support program, but providers are seeing children and families with greater needs and more complex challenges.

Transcript Highlights:

• So I wanted to make sure that we protected all of our DHS funding we get federally, and so I worked with
• And then, in terms of increasing funding, you know, what we're really, we're really, we're...
• And then in terms of increasing funding, you know, we're made up of 101 members.
• It's on the same ratio of eight; it's still on the eight-to-one or whatever the ratio is, right?
• I feel like that we have too many agencies that have been strapped without the proper funding.

Bills: HB3131 , HB3380 , HB3502 , HB3552 , HB3849 , HB3886 , HB3907 , HB4201 , HB4302 , HB3448 , HB3409 , HB4095 , HB3637

Committee: House Children, Youth and Family Services

Keywords: homelessness, shelter standards, safety, accountability, state funding, local governance, regulation, Oklahoma Homeless Shelter Safety and Accountability Act, foster care, child welfare, Department of Human Services, educational opportunities, employment support, technology in child welfare, faith-based organizations, self-sufficiency, financial literacy, HB3502, Oklahoma, children's code

Transcript Highlights:

• That ratio is 4.6.
• That ratio is 4.6.
• That ratio is 4.6.
• That ratio is 4.6.
• That ratio is 4.6.

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> funding for teachers by $9,200 a year. funding for teachers by $9,200 a year.
• EGI is a self-funded plan.
• So we would have to be funded. day one. So we would have to be funded.
• </c> industry, that 96% payout ratio? industry, that 96% payout ratio?
• Again, not funded. funded. funded.

Committee: Joint Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration

Transcript Highlights:

• And as I go down the sources and I'm taking a look at some of the funding ratios, um, and with some of
• And as I go down the sources and I'm taking a look at some of the funding ratios, um, and with some of
• </c><02:00:13.119><c> ratios</c> the funding ratios the funding ratios um<02:00:16.800><c> and</c><02
• may be approached as some of those ratios may change, and therefore the amount of funding may change
• And there are things that change in terms of the ratio of funding. Absolutely.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the June 10 minutes, and then handled a routine agenda of contracts and agreements. It deferred one Kentucky Educational Television contract to the August 2025 meeting because the vendor was not registered with the Secretary of State, and then approved the remaining routine items on the PSC green list and related contract lists without objection. The most detailed discussion involved two personal service contracts for the Kentucky Employees Health Plan. Officials from the Personnel Cabinet and Department of Employee Insurance explained that the contracts were designed to identify claims errors and overspending, with vendors paid a percentage of validated savings recovered for the plan. Senators asked how the savings were calculated and whether the contracts had changed plan processes; staff said the contracts had produced realized savings, some errors had been corrected going forward, and the vendors report quarterly. The committee approved those contracts. The committee then took up a retroactive Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority contract for a customized College Info Road Show bus. Members questioned why the contract was being presented months after execution, why it involved an out-of-state vendor, and whether the purchase was reasonable and timely. KHEAA staff said the delay stemmed from the need to finalize sustainability and safety details after the RFP, and acknowledged internal process and staffing issues. Several members criticized the retroactive approval process and said they could not validate the purchase from the information provided, but the committee ultimately approved the contract after debate. A final KHEAA discussion focused on the purpose and value of the mobile outreach bus. Staff said the bus supports college and financial aid outreach, especially in rural areas, and has been used for 26 years. Some members questioned the return on investment and whether the state should rely more on broadband and remote outreach, while others supported the program as a way to reach students and families. The committee approved the KHEAA contract, with Senator Douglas voting no and explaining concerns about whether such outreach programs are the proper role of government and whether they are the best use of public funds.

Transcript Highlights:

• majority of this funding in the economic self-sufficiency program.
• funding change.
• Funded. To 75 to 75% as required. Federal change to work forest.
• Arpa fund of. >> They have on the our funds that is reached his period of performance and those funds
• It's looking like that funding for snap education is going away.

Transcript Highlights:

• not funded in the operating budget.
• We've done so by tapping into our cash reserves, our rainy day funds.
• So ratios, I've heard that there's not a cut to ratios, but what I've heard in my community is there
• has been a cut to ratios.
• So my question is, what are the ratios?

Committee: House Health Care & Wellness

Summary: The committee heard a JLARC audit presentation on the Department of Health’s oversight of hospital inspections, complaints, and hospital data reporting. JLARC said DOH was late on 72% of acute care hospital inspections as of December 2024, had not verified that third-party accrediting standards were substantially equivalent to state requirements, did not consistently collect proof of those inspections, and was not reviewing adverse health event corrective action plans as required. JLARC also said DOH’s complaint system may have language-access barriers and that hospital data posted online is difficult for the public to use. JLARC made five recommendations to DOH and one to the Legislature; DOH concurred with the recommendations. DOH then outlined a response plan and said it had already begun work on several items. Officials said they would develop staffing and performance plans for inspections, verify accrediting body standards and require proof of third-party inspections, expand complaint forms into additional languages, seek funding and legal updates for adverse event review, and improve public access to hospital data, including a possible dashboard. They said annual progress updates would be provided to the Legislature and noted some improvement in inspection timeliness, while also emphasizing staffing, funding, and pandemic-related backlogs as constraints. The committee also received a DOH presentation on certificate of need modernization. DOH described the current program as a tool to assess community need, financial feasibility, quality, and cost containment for certain facility expansions and new services, and recommended a phased modernization focused on clarifying statutory purpose, creating a planning entity, adding flexibility, reducing legal costs, modernizing access standards, expanding oversight to freestanding emergency departments and urgent care, addressing equity, improving cost control coordination, securing ongoing funding, and using new state data systems. Members asked about streamlining overlapping inspections and whether triggers could be used to target inspections more efficiently. A final panel discussed artificial intelligence in health care, with a Coalition for Health AI representative describing industry efforts to create standards for responsible AI, including principles of usefulness, fairness, safety, transparency, security, and privacy, plus tools such as model cards and quality-assurance frameworks. The committee then heard testimony on federal and state health care funding changes from the Washington State Hospital Association and Providence Swedish, which warned that state cuts, taxes, and federal HR1 changes would worsen already thin margins, lead to service reductions, layoffs, and delayed capital investments, and increase charity care and uncompensated care. The Washington Health Benefit Exchange also began a presentation on expiring federal ACA premium tax credits and the state’s Cascade Care Savings program, warning that coverage affordability for exchange customers could be affected if federal enhancements are not extended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Fund.
• Those are all the miscellaneous funds. So those are the local funds.
• are 100% state funded.
• And you'll see those ratios here with the number of classroom teachers funded based on the class size
• Why is there an additional funding attached to the foundational funding?”

Summary: The House and Senate Education Committee first approved minutes from February 2 and 3, then took up an interim study proposal on adult education and the Excel Center model. Representatives from Goodwill Industries of Arkansas, the Excel Center network, and the University of Notre Dame’s Lab for Economic Opportunities testified that roughly 300,000 Arkansans over age 19 lack a high school diploma or GED, and argued that the Excel Center provides a supported diploma pathway for adults who struggle with GED testing. Witnesses highlighted wraparound services such as free child care, transportation assistance, tutoring, life coaching, and career services, and cited outcomes including high retention, growing enrollment, and research showing higher employment and earnings and lower criminal justice involvement for graduates. Committee members raised questions about the state’s role, existing adult education programs, and how the study would be structured; the motion to adopt the ISP passed, though there was some procedural disagreement about when questions should have been taken. The committee then heard a detailed adequacy funding overview from BLR staff Katie Walden and Adrian Beck on Arkansas K-12 education finance. They reviewed national funding principles and explained Arkansas’s system, including state and local revenue sources, the Public School Fund, the Educational Excellence Trust Fund, the Educational Adequacy Fund, and the Facilities Partnership Program. Staff said K-12 state and local revenues totaled $6.6 billion in 2025, with foundation funding making up the largest share of district and charter funding, followed by additional, categorical, and supplemental funds. They also explained the matrix-based foundation formula, the role of the uniform rate of tax, and how categorical and supplemental funds support areas such as alternative learning, English learners, special education high-cost cases, teacher salary equalization, declining enrollment, and student growth. Members asked several follow-up questions about how specific funding categories are defined and used, including student support staff, instructional aides, special education high-cost occurrences, ALE funding, teacher salary equalization, and the inclusion of Excel Center amounts in state-local funding totals. Staff said some of those details would be addressed in a later presentation and offered to provide additional records, including district lists and historical information. The meeting ended after the funding overview, with no additional votes or actions beyond the ISP adoption and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• First, the Educational Excellence Trust Fund is funded with a...
• Those are all the miscellaneous funds. So those are the local funds.
• So foundation funds make up 56% of total funds received by districts and charters in the 25... ...funds
• And you'll see those ratios here with the number of classroom teachers funded based on the class size
• Why is there an additional funding attached to the foundational funding?”

Summary: The House and Senate Education Committee first approved minutes from February 2 and 3, then heard an interim study proposal on Arkansas adult education and the Excel Center model, presented by Goodwill Industries of Arkansas and the University of Notre Dame’s Lab for Economic Opportunities. Witnesses argued that about 300,000 Arkansas adults lack a high school diploma or GED and described the Excel Center as a diploma-granting public charter option for adults 19 and older, with wraparound supports such as child care, transportation, tutoring, life coaching, and career services. They said the Arkansas campuses are not state-funded, highlighted growth in enrollment and graduation outcomes, and cited research showing improved employment, earnings, and reduced criminal justice involvement for graduates. Committee members discussed the role of Goodwill’s nonprofit mission, the need for multiple adult education pathways, and the relationship between adult education challenges and broader state efforts such as LEARNS and ACCESS. The committee then debated the interim study proposal procedure, including whether questions should have been taken before the vote. The motion to adopt the ISP passed, and members noted that the study would broadly examine adult education, GED testing, high school diplomas, charter schools, in-person adult education, and funding allocation. Several members asked for follow-up information on current adult education funding, the availability of Excel Centers, and the criminal justice study results. After that, staff from the Bureau of Legislative Research gave a detailed adequacy funding overview for Arkansas K-12 education. They reviewed national funding principles and then explained Arkansas’s revenue streams and distribution system, including general revenue, the Educational Excellence Trust Fund, the Educational Adequacy Fund, local property-tax revenues, and facilities partnership funding. They also walked through the state’s foundation formula, categorical aid, supplemental aid, and additional funding, including the per-student matrix amount of $7,771 for 2025 and how funds are allocated to districts and charters. Members asked about student support staff, special education high-cost occurrences, ALE funding, teacher salary equalization, and the Excel Center’s treatment in funding totals; staff said some of those questions would be addressed in a later spending presentation. The meeting ended after the committee was told the department was present mainly to answer questions and no further business remained.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you include the continuously appropriated funds, the state budget is about $18 billion.
• You divide our budget into the executive branch's budget, and the ratio was 1 to 420.
• And I've been a legislator now for 12 years, and when I first got elected, the ratio was 1 to 400.
• A lot of that is federally funded.
• And I've got a concern that if we started moving dedicated funds or federal funds that have very specific

Committee: House Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:

• distributed from the legacy fund.
• 90 to 100% of that ratio.
• , school township funds.
• When we get assistance from flexible transportation funding or surge funding, we don't show that as,
• In each one of those line items, you know, the road funding that we're funding to make it actually a

Summary: The subcommittee of the Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee met to begin its study of whether the content of the real estate tax statement should be revised to improve transparency. Legislative Council staff reviewed the study directive from HB 1176 and the statutory requirements for tax statements, including required line items such as true and full value, mill levy, legislative tax relief, primary residence credit, legacy fund share, discounts for early payment, and special assessments. The Tax Department then explained how the current uniform statewide statement is prescribed and approved, and noted that changes are typically driven by statute and implemented collaboratively with counties and vendors. County officials from NDACO, including auditors from McKenzie and Richland counties, described the full annual property tax timeline from budgeting through mailing final statements. They explained how counties gather budgets, calculate levies, verify taxable values, handle centrally assessed property, and prepare required notices and statements. They also said public attendance at budget hearings is generally very low, though the notices and statements generate some calls, mostly about whether attendance is required or why taxes are changing. Several members questioned the usefulness of the legislative tax relief line and the complexity of the 5% discount calculation, and county officials said the current process can be confusing and depends on manual data entry and coordination among counties, vendors, and taxing districts. The committee also discussed assessment frequency, valuation equalization, the 3% cap, and whether more frequent reassessment would reduce large jumps in taxable value. County officials said they try to use rotating reassessments and sales-ratio reviews to keep values within statutory tolerance, but staffing, training, and local market changes make the work difficult. NDACO staff estimated, based on a small county survey, that tax statement preparation and mailing costs average about 74 cents per statement, with outsourcing generally cheaper than in-house printing, and said HB 1176 added some mailing and administrative costs even if the tax statement itself did not change dramatically. Software vendors from CPT and Tyler then began presentations showing how their systems handle budgeting, valuation notices, tax statement generation, primary residence credit processing, and levy worksheets, emphasizing that many of the required calculations and reports are still manually entered or verified by county staff.

Transcript Highlights:

• funds.
• , our pension funds, and other public funds.
• Uh, the, um, funded ratio for ERB in FY 24 was 60, 65%.
• Um, its amortization period was 22 years, and then for PE, the funded ratio was 67%.
• and larger payouts due to salary increases have posed a challenge in quickly improving the funded ratio

Committee: House Investments & Pensions Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• Combining these funds of $952,000 that were used for those projects, with match funding, $1.55 million
• Revenue largely comes from general fund for this agency.
• Revenue largely comes from general fund for this agency.
• That would be Fund 34-900.
• And the cool thing about that funding is a third of that funding is either coming from a willing landowner

Committee: Senate Agricultural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• Right now, you don't get any additional funds for children who are under the age of six and under, and
• We need low adult-child ratios to drive child safety and healthy development and learning.
• need low care and with good reason we need low adult<00:04:49.080><c> child</c><00:04:49.400><c> ratios
• /c><00:04:50.320><c> drive</c><00:04:50.639><c> child</c><00:04:50.960><c> safety</c> adult child ratios
• to drive child safety adult child ratios to drive child safety and<00:04:51.560><c> healthy</c><00:04

Summary: The committee heard House File 1384, which would create the “Great Start Child Care Tax Credit” by expanding the existing dependent care credit for families with children under age six. The bill would raise the qualifying expense limits for young children, allow more children to qualify, and phase the credit down starting at $125,000 of earned household income until it reaches zero above roughly $400,000. The author said the proposal is intended to better address the high cost of child care, especially for middle-income families who may not qualify for other assistance programs. Claire Sanford of the Minnesota Child Care Association testified in support. She said child care providers across Minnesota have unused capacity because many families cannot afford services, and argued that making care cheaper for families is important for workforce participation and child development. She also supported the bill’s focus on children under five and its expansion of help up the income scale, saying middle-class families have received little assistance with child care costs. Members asked about how the bill differs from current law, the cap for a family with one child age five, and the fiscal impact. The author explained that a family with one child under age six would have a $10,000 cap under the proposal and said a prior fiscal note estimated the bill at about $200 million per year. The author also noted the proposal had been introduced previously and said the Department of Revenue’s new ability to make advance payments could be relevant as the bill moves forward. The author renewed the motion to re-refer HF 1384 to the Committee on Taxes. The committee approved the motion by voice vote, and the bill was sent to Taxes.

Transcript Highlights:

• amounts of funding.
• One state, Colorado, provides universal funding, and in Utah they provide additional funding based on
• If the funding model If the funding model puts in money for one-to-one computers, are we creating an
• Uh, the goal should be to fund the goal should be to fund technologies with demonstrated educational
• My purpose today is not to advocate for a specific funding level, staffing ratio, or legislative outcome

Committee: Joint Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration

Transcript Highlights:

• The other set a minimum wage for the industry and is contingent on funding from the legislature.
• </c> if they chose to do so uh to help fund if they chose to do so uh to help fund their<01:25:06.639
• </c><01:25:12.960><c> uh</c> uh didn't feel they needed uh funding uh uh didn't feel they needed uh funding
• </c> for uh for that grant, the grant funding for uh for that grant, the grant funding that<01:25:25.440
• The problem is not just a lack of funding.

Committee: Senate Labor