Transcript Highlights:

• <00:36:19.359> that um or is there uh rules uh process that um or is there uh rules uh process
• We got an elaborate rule making process We got an elaborate rule making process or<00:37:41.680>
• > our<00:48:59.920> districts<00:49:00.319> go process of having our districts go process
• <01:07:38.079> that AMC is supportive of the process that AMC is supportive of the process
• We know a lot of time review process.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, it's a living breathing process. process. process.
• One of them is the Medicaid eligibility process. That's a different application process.
• um and just implementing process um and just implementing process improvements<01:16:36.080>
• >> Yeah, the process has been approved by CMS. The whole process is approved by CMS in the waiver.
• >> The process from application. >> The process from application.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board’s fourth meeting focused primarily on a presentation from University of Kentucky and University of Louisville health leaders about the state university directed payment program. Mark Birdwhistle and Ken Marshall described the program as a long-running, value-based Medicaid arrangement that began in 2019, uses university-provided matching funds rather than provider taxes, and ties a portion of payments to quality outcomes. They said the program has improved measures such as tobacco cessation, diabetes control, depression screening, and cancer screening, while supporting access to specialty care, medical education, and workforce training. They also emphasized that Kentucky’s model is nationally notable and has helped improve health rankings and generate cost savings. A major topic was the federal reconciliation bill signed July 4, which the presenters said will reduce directed payments by 10% annually for 10 years beginning in 2028. UL Health estimated a first-year loss of about $75 million and a cumulative loss of about $600 million over the decade; UK estimated about $100 million in the first year, for a combined first-year impact of roughly $175 million. Both speakers warned the cuts could affect access to care, training capacity, and the sustainability of Kentucky’s value-based model, though they expressed hope that congressional action could alter or delay the changes. They also noted that 340B drug pricing changes could further strain already thin operating margins, but did not provide exact figures during the meeting. Committee members responded positively to the program’s reported outcomes and the institutions’ role in Kentucky health care. Senator Berg praised the quality of care and shared a personal example of being advised to stay at UofL for breast cancer treatment. Representative Moer highlighted Kentucky’s strong cancer-control score and asked for more explanation of the value-based payment structure; the presenters said the system is built around ongoing measurement, accountability, and collaboration with the Cabinet for Health and Family Services. No votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the amended August 27 minutes by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• the process works.
• bill um process bill um process matters matters matters and<01:19:10.840> kind<01:19:11.000
• :22.760> I Forward was not the correct process I Forward was not the correct process I have<01
• <01:19:38.159> we him to go through the right process we him to go through the right process
• We talk about process, part of the process that we have as legislators is talking to one another.

Bills: HF3023, HF3078, HF107, HF2171, HF3079, HF689, HF1316

Keywords: unemployment benefits, iron ore mining, economic support, workforce development, Minnesota, unemployment insurance, deferred resignation, employment, worker rights, benefits eligibility, Ellsworth Independent School District, ISD 514, school construction, school renovation, sales tax exemption, use tax refund, construction materials, HVAC replacement, boiler replacement, window replacement

Transcript Highlights:

• That is due process.
• That is due process.
• This process is complex.
• <06:13:00.400> Therefore, This process is complex. Therefore, This process is complex.
• Now, imagine federal process.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In any event, it was not a fair process.
• document processes document processes >> I'm<01:23:26.560> going<01:23:26.639> to
• I I get the air way through the process.
• And if so, if we don't know the process.
• This was due to claiming processing.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• commissioner must establish a process. commissioner must establish a process.
• <00:43:25.360> or one inefficiency in process or one inefficiency in process or modernization
• So, modernization of process to bring some additional integrity and law compliance.
• So, modernization of process to bring some additional integrity and law compliance.
• about we're we're frustrated the process about we're we're frustrated the process and<00:58:58.560

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Let's just please respect the process that we all agree to.
• This is a fast-moving process.
• I understand process and am probably frustrated by process more than most, but I appreciate you, Senator
• I understand process and probably frustrated by process.
• Um. process and probably frustrated by process more than most, but I appreciate you, Senator Burgess,

Summary: The Appropriations Committee considered a large agenda of bills and reported several measures favorably. Early action included SB 6, a settled claim bill involving the Department of Children and Families and a trust for Leila Estrada and Sapphire Williams, and CS/CS/SB 1266, which creates a cybersecurity experiential learning and clearance-readiness program through the Department of Commerce and Cyber Florida. The committee also approved SB 532 on clerks of court funding, allowing clerks to retain all excess Article V revenue rather than returning half to the state and clarifying foreclosure sale procedures. In addition, the committee passed CS/CS/SB 1602 and CS/CS/SB 1604 to create and fund a pilot housing program for veterans through the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, and CS/SB 1110 to expand Medicaid and private insurance coverage for medically necessary orthotics and prosthetics, including testimony from affected families and advocates. The committee also adopted an amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/SB 1012 on inmate services, removing the bill’s medical-services compensation provisions while retaining changes to the inmate welfare trust fund and related facility uses. It also adopted a delete-all amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/CS/SB 1614, which was narrowed to remove a provision allowing local governments to use excess fees to construct new buildings. The committee spent substantial time on CS/SB 17, a Medicaid oversight and transparency bill. The sponsor said the measure would create a joint legislative Medicaid oversight committee, authorize the Legislature to retain its own actuary, modernize Medicaid statutes, strengthen managed-care performance standards, and increase accountability for pharmacy benefit managers and related entities. After amendment, the committee adopted changes removing several PBM-related provisions while retaining the broader oversight framework. Testimony from supporters emphasized transparency, fraud prevention, and cost control, while a PBM trade association asked to continue working on affiliate-manufacturer, network, and payment issues. The bill was reported favorably. The most extensive discussion centered on CS/SB 1758, which proposes major changes to Medicaid and SNAP. The sponsor described five reforms: stronger fraud and overpayment recovery authority, a Medicaid work requirement for certain able-bodied adults, expanded behavioral-health services through Medicaid waivers, pharmacy-program changes to obtain rebates and reduce institutional costs, and SNAP/EBT reforms including photo IDs and work requirements. The committee adopted two amendments: one adding a transitional “glide path” for people who gain employment but risk losing Medicaid, and another exempting hospice patients with six months or less to live. Supporters argued the bill would reduce fraud, improve accountability, and encourage work, while opponents warned it would increase administrative burdens, push eligible people off coverage, and conflict with federal law or guidance. The bill remained under debate with extensive public testimony from advocates, providers, and affected families, and the transcript ends before final disposition on the measure.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:32:10.960> Um<00:32:12.159> I process last year. Um I process last year.
• That, uh, process was going to be.
• <00:51:28.480> more making the publication process more making the publication process more
• Are there a couple of uh process?
• we don't know the process because we we don't know the process because we don't<01:31:33.760> have

Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378

Keywords: judicial funding, Chief Justice security, fiscal year 2028, court system, judicial branch, judiciary, court notices, restitution, child protection, publication process, human services, Optum reports, data privacy, transparency, legislative oversight, 1183, house

Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• wellestablished local public process wellestablished local public process that's<00:59:22.319>
• But when that happens, there's a process But when that happens, there's a process in<00:59:50.000
• face during the investigation process. face during the investigation process.
• <02:21:46.399> and with the court process and with the court process and investigation.<02
• <02:38:49.040> before through the entire process before through the entire process before

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, approved the corrected journal, and heard several announcements about upcoming committee meetings, events at the Capitol, and recognitions, including Music Therapy Day, Black History Month activities, adoptable puppies, and a Colorado Agricultural Forum. Members also celebrated Representative Story’s birthday and recognized the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) for its long-running support of arts, culture, science access, and economic impact in Colorado. The House adopted Senate Joint Resolution 12, designating February 20, 2026, as Colorado FFA Day, by a vote of 64-1 with one excused. The chamber then moved to special orders for several bills. The first major bill considered was House Bill 1017, which would prohibit insurers from receiving criminal restitution unless they are direct victims. Sponsors argued the bill prioritizes human victims, prevents restitution from becoming an unpayable burden on low-income defendants, and clarifies the law in response to court concerns and stakeholder feedback. Opponents argued it would shift costs to taxpayers and policyholders and could increase civil litigation and insurance premiums. An amendment, L005, was adopted to clarify the bill’s scope, and the bill then passed as amended. The House also took up House Bill 114, concerning minimum lot size and local land-use rules. An amendment, L002, was offered to prohibit certain local lot frontage, setback, open-space, or coverage requirements that would effectively prevent construction of a single-family home on a 2,000-square-foot residential lot. Supporters framed the measure as protecting housing access, while opponents argued it would override local land-use decision-making and public hearing processes. The transcript ends during debate on a substitute motion related to the amendment, before final action on House Bill 114 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• It would have exacerbated the process.
• So then that will delay the process even more.
• And we have an agency process if they cannot afford it.
• And we have an agency process if they cannot afford it.
• House Bill 2229 streamlines the expunction process.

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2777 by Representative Rose, which would bar the death penalty for defendants who can prove by clear and convincing evidence that they had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and active psychotic symptoms at the time of the offense. Rose said the bill would still hold defendants accountable through life without parole, would save money by avoiding lengthy capital litigation, and would address cases where severe mental illness was not adequately considered. Supporters from NAMI Texas, the Catholic bishops, and a forensic psychologist said the bill is narrowly tailored, consistent with neuroscience and moral principles, and would prevent executions of people whose psychosis substantially impaired reality testing. Committee members questioned how the bill interacts with existing competency and insanity law, whether the diagnosis is sufficiently defined, and whether the statute requires active psychosis at the time of the offense. An opponent argued the death penalty should remain available for juries to decide in all cases. The bill was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 1221 by Representative Lozano, which would raise the cap on pretrial intervention program fees from $500 to $1,200. Lozano and a district attorney witness said the increase is needed because program costs have risen and the fees help make diversion programs self-sustaining, allowing first-time or low-level offenders to complete rehabilitation and potentially obtain expunction. Opponents from the Texas Fair Defense Project argued the higher fee could make diversion unaffordable for indigent defendants and undermine an important alternative to incarceration, especially where related supervision and monitoring costs already add up. Members discussed whether the fee applies only to PTI participants, how payment plans and waivers work, and whether ability to pay should be addressed more explicitly. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 1738 by Representative Jones, which would repeal Penal Code Section 21.06 and related Health and Safety Code references concerning homosexual conduct. Jones said the law is unconstitutional under Lawrence v. Texas, remains harmful on the books, and has led to confusion and unnecessary costs even though it is unenforceable. Supporters said the bill simply removes outdated language and protects civil liberties, while opponents from Texas Values argued the statute still serves as a statement that homosexual conduct is unacceptable and should remain as a warning, even if unenforceable. Members debated whether the law’s remaining language is merely symbolic or still harmful, and whether other criminal statutes already cover conduct such as prostitution, incest, and offenses involving minors. The bill was left pending after testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, not a process change for DVS.
• <00:29:51.600> that<00:29:51.720> are the processes that are the processes that are
• He said the process of obtaining a mobile ID requires you to go through a process on the phone, and the
• <01:22:25.600> that and then vetted through a process that and then vetted through a process
• <01:31:06.560> though Cadence for updates a process though Cadence for updates a process though

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• the event I had force while processing the event I had my<00:31:42.519> wife<00:31:42.799>
• uh of the 50 states that I oi process uh of the 50 states that I reviewed<00:36:30.079> as<00
• It deprives officers of due process.
• We just wanted to have a fair process.
• And so, you know, I'm sure that there is a process in place.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We have seen time and time again throughout the legislative process where definitions change.
• So this isn't an uncommon process.
• Year in and year out, we pass statute in this building that changes the regulatory process.
• But kind of to put the thumb, or more like it feels like a hammer on the scale of that process going
• This requires an entirely different thought process. But that's what we're trying to do.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• is not overtaking a... ...that the political process is not overtaking a democratic process.
• Requiring remote virtual inspections for simple renovations will speed up the process for homeowners
• Requiring remote virtual inspections for simple renovations will speed up the process for homeowners
• California courts process over 3 million infractions each year.
• Amendments taken through the policy committee process have removed opposition.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If it's about as clear as mud, and so just requiring that transparent budgeting process, and you may
• And then, particularly now that Workforce Pell is coming out, having a very clear process for calling
• You may as a state to say, well, we want every local area to have to go through this process.
• The letter is before y'all that we are still working through the process.
• It always depends on the review process and the questions and answers that we get back.

Summary: The committee heard a presentation from Nick Moore, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Office of Career and Technical Education, focused on integrating workforce, education, training, and human services systems. Moore argued that WIOA, Perkins, and ESSA should be aligned more closely, with fewer federal and state bureaucratic layers, more state flexibility, and a stronger emphasis on labor force participation, postsecondary attainment, and training tied to in-demand jobs. He said the federal agencies are moving toward combined plan timelines for 2026, encouraged states to pursue combined plans and waivers, and described efforts to streamline reporting, reduce administrative overhead, and expand tools such as integrated intake, cross-training, virtual and mobile service delivery, apprenticeship, and talent marketplaces. Moore also emphasized accountability and outcomes, saying states should measure training-related employment, retention, and the share of funds going to direct services rather than administration. He criticized the current workforce system as too costly and ineffective, and said states should use primary labor market information, better wage records, and employer input to align training with actual job demand. Members asked about balancing flexibility with accountability, the role of employers versus postsecondary institutions, serving rural “training deserts,” state waivers, and data-sharing systems such as Mississippi’s workforce technology efforts. Moore said states can use waivers and technology to create common intake and co-enrollment across programs, and that enhanced wage records are key to better workforce planning. The committee then received a separate update from DHS Secretary Janet Mann and Director Jay Hill on reimbursement rates for aging and adult behavioral health services. They said DHS had compiled more than 100 public comments, submitted a recommendation to the governor to hold current rates, and was awaiting executive review, which they estimated could take 30 to 60 days. Members asked about the timeline and the scope of the legislation requiring monthly reports. The meeting ended with notice of a later audit presentation scheduled for 1:00 p.m. at the Big Mac building.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have an enforcement process, we have a licensing process, we have a criminal history process, and
• Another option would be for certificate holders to still go through the licensing process.
• process and then backfill any other outstanding requirements that they haven't had.
• It would require, I guess, significant more review and more familiarity with their processes.
• Budgeting is the cornerstone of the legislative process, as I know this body knows, absolutely.

Bills: HB5208, SB863, SB1243, SB1624, SB1965, SB2660, SB2702, SB2885

Keywords: water filtration, public drinking water, health and safety, well maintenance, water quality, Edwards Aquifer, water conservation, reclaimed water, aquifer storage, environmental protection, public utility agency, dissolution, local government, regulatory framework, municipal authority, Texas Water Bank, Texas Water Trust, water rights, water banking, instream flow

Transcript Highlights:

• And as you recall, we've been going through this process of looking at different perspectives within
• The rulemaking process has been completed, and rules take effect next week, on July 21st.
• Sharing system improvements and process improvements that we can share with one another.
• And so I think an education piece can help with how our agency processes cases.
• And I know there will be more stats presented when that process happens.

Keywords: 907, all

Transcript Highlights:

• illness will preclude them from accepting a job offer before they go through the job application process
• illness will preclude them from accepting a job offer before they go through the job application process
• Worker Act, uh an Processing Worker Act, uh an appropriation<00:05:00.160> for<00:05:00.320><
• Chair, you've always been a champion of the process, and it feels like this is short-cutting the process
• <00:31:13.480> in<00:31:13.600> a<00:31:13.640> very process in a very process in

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Rather, they're intended to establish proper institutional processes.
• Um, I think, as you know, the legislative process can take some time.
• This is our simple process we're trying to do. Thank him very much, Mr.
• <00:30:55.600> Thank simple process we're trying to do.
• Thank simple process we're trying to do.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:04 Roll Call 00:00:14 HB 682 Discussion 00:01:41 HB 682 Vote 00:03:10 HB 731 Discussion 00:04:33 HB 731 Vote 00:06:26 HB 607 Discussion 00:09:24 HB 607 Vote 00:32:15 Adjournment 00:34:12, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's an accurate statement if they go through this process.
• There is a process that takes place where there has to be notification.
• There is a process that takes place where there has to be notification.
• There is a process that takes place where there has to be notification.
• There is a process that takes place where there has to be notification.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:04 Roll Call 00:00:23 HB 246 Discussion 00:02:47 HB 246 Vote 00:15:15 HB 613 Discussion 00:17:04 HB 613 Vote 00:29:09 Adjournment 00:30:37, 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Local Government met with a quorum present and briefly introduced a guest before taking up two bills. House Bill 246, as amended by House Committee Substitute 1, would require animal control officers to complete training on recognizing child abuse and neglect. The sponsor and a young advocate testified that animal control officers often encounter warning signs in homes, cited data linking animal abuse and child abuse, and said the training would be free, brief, and housed by Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky. The committee substitute was explained as addressing local government liability concerns by allowing counties to opt out, tying the bill to existing reporting statutes, and clarifying that the training creates no investigative duty. Members asked about whether the training was one-time, how opt-outs would be tracked, and whether the information would be public; the sponsor and witness said participation would be tracked and the training/evaluation would be available through the organization. The committee approved HB 246 with favorable expression to pass on the House floor. The committee then considered House Bill 613, which would give Chapter 75 fire districts a process to seek a tax increase above the current 10-cent cap through public hearings and voter recall, while preserving local control. The sponsor and fire service representatives said the bill responds to modern fire district costs, including higher equipment prices, staffing shortages, declining volunteer numbers, and the shift to all-hazards service. They emphasized that any increase would be subject to notice, public comment, and a voter recall mechanism, and said the cap would remain in place unless the district used the new process. Members questioned the fiscal impact language, the meaning of the cap, and whether the bill effectively removed the cap; the sponsor clarified that the cap stays but districts could go up to two cents above it through the process, with voters able to recall the increase. One member passed on the vote due to concern about the indeterminable fiscal impact, but the committee still reported HB 613 favorably to the House floor. The meeting then adjourned.