Transcript Highlights:

• The bill has received no, no votes. I would respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you.
• With that, I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
• And with that, I do ask respectfully for an aye vote. Okay, let's call the vote.
• And with that, I do ask respectfully for an aye vote. Okay, let's call the vote.
• I respectfully ask for an aye vote.

Summary: The committee heard several bills, with most drawing support after amendments or ongoing stakeholder negotiations. SB 29, by Senator Laird, would extend a sunset on the law allowing pain-and-suffering claims to survive a plaintiff’s death; supporters, including a family member describing a medical negligence case, labor groups, consumer advocates, and disability and elder organizations, argued it prevents defendants from running out the clock, while hospitals, medical groups, and business organizations warned of higher costs and added liability. After extensive debate about data collection, settlement reporting, and the impact on health care access, the bill passed to Appropriations on a divided vote. SB 294, by Senator Reyes and presented by Senator Laird, would require employers to notify a worker’s emergency contact if the worker is arrested or detained and would create a template to inform employees of state and federal labor rights. Labor and worker advocates said the bill would help workers understand and enforce their rights amid weakened federal enforcement; there was no opposition on file, and the bill passed unanimously to Appropriations. SB 697 would modernize water-rights adjudication by allowing the State Water Board to use technology instead of requiring in-person field investigations; with no opposition, it also passed unanimously. The committee also advanced SB 37 on attorney advertising, SB 645 on peremptory challenges in civil cases, SB 303 on bias-mitigation trainings in public workplaces, and SB 464 on expanding pay-data reporting for specified state workers. SB 37 drew support from consumer and legal groups but concerns from Walker Advertising about joint advertising; members said negotiations were ongoing, and the bill passed. SB 645 would extend anti-bias jury-selection rules to certain civil rights cases; criminal-defense and defense groups said they were close to agreement, and the bill passed. SB 303 and SB 464 were both amended to narrow scope and moved forward after several opponents shifted to neutral or removed opposition. The committee also approved a consent calendar of additional bills, all sent to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, it's long overdue, and I would ask for your vote of support. Please vote green.
• I encourage a green vote.
• Vote green. Further discussion on the bill?
• This is a technical cleanup bill that does two major things.
• I call the vote. Announcements by the speaker.

Transcript Highlights:

• I got a command sergeant major over here. I got a major over here.
• I got a vote, baby. I got a vote, baby. Hold on.
• May I explain my vote?
• I vote no. If I can explain my vote. Yes. Representative Barquez? I. I really believe.
• Please vote aye. And I vote aye. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Please vote no.
• I'm going to vote no.
• With that, I vote aye. With that, I vote aye. Clear vote of six ayes, four nays.
• Representative Taylor, I can explain my vote. Yes, so I... I can explain my vote, yes.
• I vote aye. ...is certainly a worthwhile effort, and so it's a good bill. I vote aye.

Bills: HB2042, HB2052, HB2055, HB2056, HB2094, HB2098, HB2185, HB2328, HB2758, HB2798

Keywords: solar radiation management, environment, prohibition, Arizona Revised Statutes, public health, complaint process, Attorney General, groundwater management, water conservation, irrigation, water supply, brackish groundwater, water supply development, desalination, water infrastructure, financial assistance, environmental reviews, brackish water, groundwater, water resources

Transcript Highlights:

• Committee, by your vote, the bill is reported favorably with committee substitute.
• Committee, by your vote, the bill is reported favorably with committee substitute.
• By your vote, the bill is reported favorably with committee substitute.
• By your vote, the bill. Kendall.
• By your vote, the bill is reported favorably with committee substitute.

Summary: The Education Employment Committee held its first meeting and heard three bills. Chair Kennedy opened with remarks about the committee’s work and the goal of moving Florida from “excellent to eminent.” The committee first considered PCS for CS for HB 151 on private school participation in interscholastic sports and extracurricular activities. Representative Abbott explained that the bill would let private school students participate in sports at FHSAA member schools when their own school does not offer that sport, clarify treatment of single-sex versus co-ed teams, adjust FHSAA board appointment authority, require appeals panels to include a majority of member-school representatives, set timelines for eligibility appeals, and post appeals decisions online. An amendment by Representative McFarland added FHSAA board decisions to the transparency requirement. The bill drew supportive public testimony and was reported favorably as amended by a 19-0 vote. The committee then took up HB 549 on the “Gulf of America.” Representative Porras said the bill would align Florida’s geographic materials and academic standards with the federal designation replacing the Gulf of Mexico, with a later amendment to phase in the change only for materials adopted or acquired on or after July 1, 2025. Members questioned the timing, costs, and impact on instructional materials; the ranking member and others argued the bill was unnecessary and could burden districts, while supporters said Florida should lead in adopting the federal terminology. Public testimony included support from Florida Citizens Alliance and opposition from a speaker who called the bill a waste of time. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably with committee substitute by a 16-2 vote. Finally, the committee considered CS/HB 85 on hazardous walking conditions. Representative Kendall described the bill as addressing elementary students who live within the two-mile walk zone but must cross interstates, freeways, highways, or ramps, and said the measure would provide bus service in those hazardous situations. An amendment clarified the language by tying it to the statutory definition of a limited access facility. Members from both parties described local safety concerns and personal experiences, while one member noted the likely added cost to districts. Public testimony listed opponents, but the chair later clarified they had submitted cards with the wrong bill number. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably with committee substitute by a 20-0 vote, then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I join my colleagues in respectfully asking for your aye vote on ACR 7.
• Members, I respectfully urge your aye vote on ACR 7. Thank you. Thank you, Mr.
• And with that I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Bryan. Mr.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. This is for co-authors.
• All members vote who desire to vote. The clerk will. Those no. The ayes have it.

Transcript Highlights:

• That organization has had some very major issues since we last met and dealt with this issue.
• That organization has had some very major issues since we last met and dealt with this issue.
• That organization has had some very major issues since we last met and dealt with this issue.
• That organization has had some very major issues since we last met and dealt with this issue.
• That organization has had some very major issues since we last met and dealt with this issue.

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee took up House File 3388, and an A1 amendment was adopted by voice vote. The bill, as amended, would direct the Department of Commerce to seek another federal waiver to continue Minnesota’s reinsurance program and preserve the assessment-and-tax-credit funding model adopted last session. Chair O’Driscoll said the measure is intended to give future legislators options before the current reinsurance structure ends, warning that without it individual-market premiums could rise substantially and more people could lose coverage. Testimony was largely supportive. Dan Andre of the Minnesota Council of Health Plans said reinsurance has been a success since 2018, has lowered premiums by covering a portion of high-cost claims, and helped subsidize care for more than 5,000 Minnesotans in 2024. Ann New Brindley of the Minnesota Business Partnership and Steven Rubis of the Health Plan Partnership of Minnesota also backed the bill, saying market stability is important amid the loss of federal premium tax credits and that continued reinsurance would help prevent further premium increases and cost shifting. Jonathan Carter of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce likewise supported the bill, citing the program’s role in keeping Minnesota’s individual-market premiums among the lowest in the country. Members also discussed how the assessment and tax-credit mechanism works, with Chair O’Driscoll describing it as an assessment on plans followed by a tax credit against state liability. Representative Elkins questioned how insurers self-assess, and Representative Smith said the assessment model is preferable to a general-fund approach if the program continues. Representative Kaggel raised concerns about taxpayer costs and the broader health care system, while also saying the current system is unsustainable and in need of more fundamental change. The committee then renewed the motion to lay House File 3388, as amended, over for possible inclusion in an omnibus bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, I think from the vast majority of our members we're being perspective that.
• That where you're registered to vote? How do you decide that?
• Like many cities, police and fire constitute the majority of our budgets.
• One takeaway from my comments. that I hope you'll remember is that voting, if you vote for House.
• OK, members, we'll now vote out several bills. Which we have heard previously.

Bills: HB134, HB135, HB 1109, HB 1243, HB1392, HB1399, HJR99, HB134, HB135

Keywords: sales tax, use tax, local tax, municipal tax, county tax, tax sourcing, place of business, principal business location, small business, retailer, marketplace seller, economic development agreement, Chapter 321, Chapter 323, Tax Code, Texas Comptroller, local sales and use tax, tax jurisdiction, order consummation, ship-to location

Transcript Highlights:

• I'd like to explain my vote. >> Please proceed. >> Mr.
• explain my I vote. explain my I vote. >> Please<00:35:28.480> proceed.
• change or explain their vote? change or explain their vote?
• And the majority, and I'm talking about us as a majority because we all were involved, ran this chamber
• Any members seeking recognition to cast change or explain their vote?

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Senate convened with an invocation, Pledge of Allegiance, roll call, and a quorum established. The journal was approved, absent senators were excused, and new bills and resolutions were introduced, including measures on housing districts, calorie information, alcohol beverage control, county clerk filings, vital records, and a resolution honoring Dr. Samantha Shaver. The chamber also received notice that the House had passed House Bills 384, 144, and 290 and requested concurrence. The Senate then recessed briefly for party caucuses before reconvening. The main floor action centered on Senate Bill 3, relating to school district finances. The bill, as amended by Senate Committee Amendment 1 and Senate Floor Amendment 2, was described as strengthening financial transparency for school districts by requiring public access to budgeting information, monthly credit card statements, superintendent contracts and compensation, audits, and final working budgets. Supporters argued it would improve fiscal responsibility and accountability in response to concerns about spending practices in large districts. The Senate adopted both amendments and passed SB 3 by a vote of 35-1, with one senator explaining a no vote while acknowledging the need for transparency. The Senate then took up Senate Bill 1, relating to education and the governance structure of a large school district. Supporters said the bill responds to a recent court ruling by adding detailed findings to justify treating the district differently and by clarifying that the superintendent handles day-to-day operations while the board focuses on strategic planning, budget approval, audits, and hiring or firing the superintendent. Proponents cited the district’s size, share of state education funding, number of students, and concentration of low-performing schools as reasons for the change. Opponents argued the bill would reduce elected board accountability, questioned whether the structure would improve outcomes, and emphasized broader funding and achievement challenges. After extended debate, the Senate proceeded to a vote on SB 1; the transcript shows a brief proponent statement and a lengthy opposing explanation, but the final vote result is not included in the provided text.

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Roll call has been requested, and when the vote is taken, it shall be by roll.
• >> Senator<00:18:35.440> Major, >> Senator Major, >> Senator Major, >>
• >> Yes, The vote is 30-0.
• That is when this vote will come up.
• Um I just when this vote will come up.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > bodies But majorities in both bodies But majorities in both bodies work<00:13:35.160> together
• Representative Jordan votes aye. Representative Fischer votes aye.
• Representative Heintzeman votes aye. Representative Berkel votes aye. Senator Her votes aye.
• Senator McEwen votes aye. Senator Kupec votes aye.
• Jordan votes I. >> Representative Jordan. Jordan votes I.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Conference Committee met on May 13, 2026, to finalize House File 3426. After roll call established a quorum, staff walked members through the conference agreement and spreadsheet, noting that most appropriations were unchanged from the House and Senate positions. The report kept the LCCMR recommendations in resiliency, water, fish and wildlife, energy, and most land and education/outdoor recreation items, while removing the “cultivating conservation leaders through education and wilderness experiences” project and a Senate rotational grazing pilot provision. The committee also noted the overall appropriation total and carryforwards/extensions, and that the community grants program appropriation remained in the bill. Members then reviewed the policy language in the DE amendment. The agreement retained House provisions setting guardrails for the community grants program, including requirements for emerging issues account votes, maximum grant amounts, staff training, monitoring visits, pre-award risk assessments, surety bond or fiscal-agent approval for advance payments, and quarterly progress reports, while also adopting Senate language repealing a DNR acquisition-approval requirement. Senators McEwen and Her offered contrasting comments about the removal of the Boundary Waters-related project, with McEwen criticizing the decision as politicized and Her emphasizing stewardship and the importance of exposing young people to the Boundary Waters. Representatives Heintzeman and Fischer defended the need for accountability and said the issue had been addressed in a bipartisan way. The committee reported receiving a letter from the DNR supporting the language and thanking the conferees and staff. Chair Her moved adoption of the HF 3426 DE amendment and the spreadsheet dated 5/13/26 at 11:38 a.m., authorized staff to prepare the conference committee report and make technical and conforming changes, and the motion passed 7-0. The meeting ended with thanks to staff, LCCMR participants, and Speaker Melissa Hortman, followed by adjournment and instructions for members to watch for and sign the conference committee report electronically that night.

Transcript Highlights:

• And with that, I respectfully ask for an I vote. Thank you.
• Madam Clerk, if you could call the vote.
• Madam Clerk, if you could call the vote.
• Agriar Curry, not voting, calmly. Allanese, aye. Aguirre Curry. Agriar Curry, not voting. Connolly.
• The vote has zero no votes and eight votes. So it's out of committee and down to Appropriations.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Agriculture heard three bills. SB 18 by Senator Rubio would create a Food Desert Elimination Grant Program at CDFA to help open or improve grocery stores in food desert communities. Supporters said it would improve access to healthy food, create jobs, and help underserved neighborhoods; opponents argued it could favor large chains, lacked community input and accountability, and should better prioritize tribal, BIPOC-owned, and community-led retail. Committee members raised concerns about population thresholds, community engagement, and long-term commitments, and the author said the bill could be strengthened with guardrails. SB 18 passed 7-0 and was sent to Appropriations. SB 312 by Senator Umberg would require out-of-state shippers of dogs to electronically submit health certificates to CDFA and make them available to buyers and enforcement agencies, aiming to improve consumer protection and traceability in the puppy import pipeline. Supporters from animal welfare and humane organizations said the bill would help stop sick or misrepresented puppies from entering California and give investigators a central record. Members asked about privacy and enforcement, and the author indicated amendments could address consumer privacy concerns. The bill passed unanimously and was sent to Appropriations. SB 493 by Senator Becker would change how compensation is set for secretary managers of district agricultural associations and fairgrounds, shifting salary-setting authority to CDFA and requiring periodic salary surveys. Supporters said fairgrounds are critical emergency-response and community facilities and that the bill would help recruit and retain qualified leaders with fairer pay. Some members expressed concern about local control and appointment delays, but clarified the bill only addressed salary, not appointments. SB 493 also passed unanimously and was sent to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• The majority of the board's appointments...
• The majority of the board's appointments will come from the governor, but also from the Speaker of the
• The only change really is that the governor becomes a voting member, and that's why the synopsis reads
• Previously, she was not a voting member, and now she will be.
• Okay, we have a couple of "no" votes. Okay, the ayes have it. A couple of "no" votes.

Bills: SB242, SB5, HB596, SB5

Keywords: codification, state law, legal revisions, Alabama code, legislative updates, archives, history, board of trustees, vacancies, government control, catfish, transportation, public waters, criminal penalties, natural resources, education, public schools, constitution amendment, national anthem, weekly broadcast

Transcript Highlights:

• four commissioners have the same vote as each other.
• Commissioners have the same vote as each other.
• four commissioners have the same vote as each other.
• And so the commissioners have the same vote as each other.
• Let grace, facts, and humanity guide your vote. Please vote no on House Bill 387.

Bills: HB240, HB2097, HB2731, HB3087, HB3234, HB3319, HB3394, HB3687, HB4105, HB4205, HB4350, HB4462, HB4642, HB4801, HB5403

Keywords: quorum, tax levy, county governance, local government, population regulations, quorum requirement, Texas counties, population threshold, deputy sheriff, civil service, law enforcement, appeals process, sheriff's department, HB 2731, roadside vendors, solicitors, county regulation, border counties, Mexico border, Transportation Code

Summary: The subcommittee on county and regional government heard a long agenda of county-related bills, with most measures left pending after testimony. HB 2097, by Rep. Martinez, would let counties that opt in use an independent hearing examiner instead of a civil service commission for certain deputy sheriff discipline appeals; the bill drew support from CLEET’s Robert Leonard, who said it would be fairer and faster, and it was left pending. HB 4642, by Rep. Gonzalez, would require counties that contract with out-of-state jail facilities to include Texas jail-standard protections and oversight; Gonzalez, detainee Jess Hampton, his wife, Texas Jail Project’s Krish Kundu, and TCJS director Brandon Wood all discussed deaths and poor conditions in Louisiana facilities, staffing shortages, and the need for guardrails and data collection. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4350, by Rep. Capriglione, allowing peace officers to request redaction of personal information from online real property records. Supporters said officers face targeted threats and should have protections similar to judges; a title industry witness warned about preserving the integrity of land records. The bill was left pending. HB 3687, by Rep. Harless, would require county fire marshals in counties over 100,000 to meet training and certification standards within set timeframes; Harris County Fire Marshal Laurie Christensen supported professionalization, and the bill was left pending. HB 4105 would let very large counties give a local-bid preference for construction and infrastructure contracts, and HB 4205 would require pay parity for similar law enforcement ranks within large counties; both were supported by Harris County officials and constables and left pending. Later, the committee heard HB 5403, which would repeal a special rule limiting Dallas and Tarrant county sheriffs’ control over commissary funds; the author said it would remove an outdated population bracket, and the bill was left pending. HB 4462 would require large counties to allow elected officials named in civil suits to seek outside counsel and have a role in settlement decisions; supporters argued county attorneys and commissioners court can have conflicts of interest, while questions focused on who qualifies and whether the bill could complicate settlements. The bill was left pending. Finally, HB 240, by Rep. Swanson, would restore a five-member quorum requirement for Harris County tax levies, effectively preventing tax action without all commissioners present and defaulting to the no-new-revenue rate if quorum is not met; urban counties opposed it as a potential budget obstruction, while supporters said it protects taxpayers and representation. That bill was also left pending. The transcript ends as the committee begins HB 3319, which would create a civil service system for constable department employees in large counties, but the discussion is cut off before testimony or action.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:04:35.120> economic national product and our major economic national product and our major
• , please cast your vote first.
• Chairman Meredith, I vote aye on Resolution 110.
• No, we're not voting on this. Mills, would you like to cast a vote for Senate Bill 13? Mr.
• Chairman, I missed a great discussion, I'm sure, and vote on a great bill, so I vote aye on Senate Bill

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Health Services met with a quorum, first taking up referred administrative regulations. One regulation was deferred, and two others were noted as deficient; with no one wishing to speak, the committee treated the regulations as reviewed. The committee then heard Senate Bill 13 from Chairman Meredith, which would reduce the number of Medicaid managed care organizations from five to three. Meredith argued the bill would reduce administrative burden, improve oversight, help rural providers, and potentially lower costs for families and the Medicaid program. Senators Berg, Herron, and Douglas asked about data, patient impact, network adequacy, and prior authorization burdens; Meredith said the effect on patients would be indirect through better access and less administrative delay. The committee approved a committee substitute and passed SB 13 favorably on a 10-0 vote. The committee next considered Senate Joint Resolution 26, presented by Senator Richardson and Kentucky Pharmacists Association Executive Director Ben Mudd. The resolution asks the Department of Medicaid Services to provide data and cost analysis on paying pharmacists fairly for clinical services already within their scope of practice under Medicaid and KCHIP. Supporters said pharmacists can improve access, especially in rural areas, by providing services such as medication therapy management, chronic disease management, and preventive care, and that the resolution is intended to gather information before any future bill. Senator Douglas questioned whether expanded pharmacy duties have actually improved access or outcomes and whether there is published data; Mudd said the Board of Pharmacy tracks use of protocols but that more data is needed. The committee approved the resolution by roll call, with all members voting aye. At the end of the meeting, Chairman Meredith announced that Senate Bill 27 would be heard for discussion only and not acted on that day so members could review it further. Senator Brandon Storm introduced SB 27, which would create a Kentucky Parkinson’s disease research registry, and noted that a Michael J. Fox Foundation representative could not attend because of a winter storm; her letter was included in the packet. Storm said the registry is intended to support research and policy by tracking Parkinson’s disease in Kentucky, citing national prevalence and cost figures. No vote was taken on SB 27 during this meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• FELT FITTING TO MAKE THE SUNSET THE SAME AS OUR TERM ON IT SO EVERY LEGISLATION HAS THE CHANCE TO VOTE
• I ASSUME WE ARE GOING TO BE VOTING ON THIS PROPOSAL SHORTLY.
• I NOTICED THAT WE AS MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ARE NOT GIVEN NOTIFICATION WE WOULD BE VOTING ON THESE
• SOME SORT OF STAFF ANALYSIS WITH THE PROPOSALS THAT MIGHT HELP US BETTER DIGEST WHAT WE ARE VOTING ON
• BEFORE WE ARE PASSING THE VOTE ON THEIR PROPOSALS?

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• about students and students voting about students and students voting um<00:13:30.240> my
• <00:24:42.640> on<00:24:43.240> all vote on the amendment then vote on all vote on
• voting machine does.
• It doesn’t change the outcome of the vote; it changes the process in which the vote is taken.
• I didn't vote in more than 12; however, I did vote in that city election.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senators proceed to vote. Have all senators voted? Have all senators voted?
• Secretary, unlock the board and Senators proceed to vote. Have all Senators voted?
• Senators proceed to vote. Have all Senators voted? All Senators voted.
• The secretary unlocked the board, and the senators proceed to vote. Vote of all senators voted.
• The board and senators proceed to vote. Have all senators voted? Have all senators voted?

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm here today to urge to vote no on this bill.
• I urge you to vote no on this bill.
• I'm asking you to please vote no on 17. 0, 8, not only for I'm asking you to please vote no on 17. 0,
• Please don't take this decision lightly and vote No on SB 17.
• Yes by your vote show Cs for SB 17. 0, 8, is reported favorably.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And regardless of what party holds the White House or the majority, our shared goal as a committee must
• So I appreciate the majority. We're going to be waiting until today when we finally got Mr.
• Chairman, I ask for a roll call vote. Clerk will call the roll. Mr. Thune. Aye. Mr. Wicker. Aye.
• A strong bipartisan and unanimous vote.
• , I guess that Secretary Duffy is going to have a lot on his shoulders with that strong bipartisan vote