Video & Transcript Research : 'data mapping'

Page 210 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Aug 18th, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think, I mean, data sharing, we need to do that.
  • I was trying to find data kind of correlating the two.
  • that data?
  • Talk data, I spend a majority of my day mining through data, so I'm not sure what exactly data that we're
  • So let me just clarify, it's the data on duly involved youth.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Education Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I enjoyed seeing all this data.
  • The data from 20 to 23.
  • This is data on California.
  • You need actionable data.
  • One, California has been really excellent at using data, publicizing data.
Keywords: 988, house, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I would love that data. I also have a question, I guess, about the bill. So, if...
  • So, I would love that data. I also have a question, I guess, about the bill.
  • So, I would love that data. I also have a question, I guess, about the bill. So, if...
  • So, I would love that data. I also have a question, I guess, about the bill.
  • So, I would love that data. I also have a question, I guess, about the bill. So, if...
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 2591, the “Support Medicaid Not Millionaires Act,” laid over for possible inclusion in the 2025 taxes bill. Chair Gomez said the bill would create a fifth individual income tax tier on very high earners to offset any future federal Medicaid cuts, arguing that proposed federal budget changes would likely reduce Medicaid funding and create a large state budget hole. Gomez and other supporters framed Medicaid as essential for children, long-term care, mental health, substance use treatment, rural hospitals, and families across Minnesota, and criticized federal tax cuts for corporations and wealthy individuals. Several testifiers supported the bill. A SEIU Healthcare worker described how Medicaid supports her care for a disabled son and her own health needs, warning that cuts would threaten home care, hospitals, and nursing homes. A public health employee from the Minnesota Association of Professional Employees said recent state and federal layoffs had already weakened public health capacity and urged additional revenue to backfill losses. Other supporters, including community and faith leaders, said the wealthy and corporations should pay more to protect public services, youth programs, and Medicaid-funded care. A mental health provider testified that most of the people served by her clinic rely on Medicaid and that cuts would harm clinics, rural access, and the broader behavioral health system. Representative Anderson questioned whether the bill would affect Medicaid spending tied to undocumented immigrants and asked for data on MinnesotaCare and federal-state funding shares. Department of Human Services staff clarified that he was referring to MinnesotaCare, not Medicaid, and said Medicaid is generally matched by the federal government while MinnesotaCare does not have the same match. The exchange became contentious when Gomez objected to Anderson’s use of the term “illegal immigrants” and redirected the discussion back to the bill. Anderson also raised concerns about Medicaid fraud and whether the proposal would backfill any federal changes related to fraud enforcement. No vote was taken; the bill was simply laid over.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Mortgage Finance Authority Act Oversight Sep 2nd, 2025

Mortgage Finance Authority Act Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • But it is If you will, at trying to consolidate all of that data so that we are aware of the need, the
  • This is our Restoring Our Communities service provider map. Right now, we are Next slide.
  • So we will have all of that the new data shortly, and that's something our next meeting in October, but
  • And I do want to point out on this map that not everyone in each county is receiving the same funding
  • So, some of those are our continuum of care So they're all kind of lumped into one map.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Elections - 02/06/25

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Examples include Pennsylvania, which struck down a gerrymandered map and an onerous voter ID requirement
  • Examples include Pennsylvania, which struck down a gerrymandered map and an onerous voter ID requirement
  • And by inserting the word integrity there, I am attempting to ensure that the data is not corrupted,
  • And by inserting the word integrity there, I am attempting to ensure that the data is not corrupted,
  • <00:54:09.960> the that the data the that the data the votes<00:54:12.520> are<00:54
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
Summary: The Senate Elections Committee met on February 6, 2025, and first considered the reappointment of Steven Swanson to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board. Swanson described his background in legal aid, lobbying, judging, and international rule-of-law work, and said he wanted to continue serving the public. Committee members praised his experience and discussed the importance of campaign finance oversight, including preventing corporate participation in Minnesota elections. Senator Wosinski moved to recommend Swanson’s confirmation, and the motion was adopted. The committee then heard Senate File 529, a proposed constitutional amendment to state that elections shall be free, fair, and equal, and that no civil or military power may interfere with the free exercise of the right to vote. Senator Dibble presented the bill as a way to strengthen voting rights and provide a constitutional basis to challenge voter suppression, gerrymandering, and unfair campaign practices. Testimony in support came from David Fischer of Clean Elections Minnesota and Jean Massie of Fair Vote Minnesota, both of whom argued the amendment would protect access to voting, increase confidence in elections, and align Minnesota with other states that have similar language. Members discussed whether the amendment’s broad language could invite judicial interpretation or affect future election laws. Senator Koran questioned how the proposal would improve Minnesota’s already high turnout, while Senator Grant raised concerns that the terms “free, fair, and equal” were undefined and could shift power to the courts. Senator Lucero proposed an oral amendment to add “ensuring one eligible citizen, one vote” after the word “equal,” saying it would address concerns about future voter ID laws. The amendment was restated by counsel and discussed, with Senator Dibble saying it did not significantly harm the bill but suggesting it might imply a requirement he did not intend. The transcript ends during discussion of that oral amendment, and no final vote on the bill itself is shown.