Video & Transcript : 'judicial behavior' :

Page 20 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Jan 23rd, 2025

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • We granted the pilot in three judicial districts, including the 1st, 4th, and 12th.
  • I don't have behavioral health staff.
  • I couldn't be happier about the 1st Judicial District today actually starting an AOT program.
  • And that's kind of what we were recommending in some parts of the behavior... Health Bill.
  • Of the folks with behavioral health needs in our state.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Fatal crashes are caused by a range of unsafe driving behaviors.
  • The judicial, the court process, can take.
  • And we need to address that behavior immediately.
  • Do you have— The judicial side and the DMV side.
  • But I believe it contains both the judicial side.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary C May 5th, 2026

Judiciary C

Transcript Highlights:
  • Brad Burgett, the Seventh Judicial District Court district attorney, in support.
  • And Andy Shevey with the 16th Judicial District Court; he's an assistant district attorney.
  • Behavioral health check-ins are included when appropriate. remain intact, behavior health check-ins are
  • Andy Shealy, the ADA from the 16th Judicial District District Attorney.
  • Andy Shealy, ADA with the 16th Judicial District Court, will provide information if requested.
Committee: Senate Judiciary C
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary C May 5th, 2026

Judiciary C

Transcript Highlights:
  • Brad Burgett, the Seventh Judicial District Court district attorney, in support.
  • And Andy Shevey with the 16th Judicial District Court; he's an assistant district attorney.
  • Behavioral health check-ins are included when appropriate.
  • Behavioral health check-ins are included when appropriate. remain intact, behavior health check-ins are
  • Andy Shealy, the ADA from the 16th Judicial District District Attorney.
Committee: Senate Judiciary C
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes and then heard House Bill 1033, which expands the definition of critical infrastructure to include airports, heliports, spaceports, aerospace facilities, certain government and military sites, and oil and gas platforms. Supporters said the bill is part of a broader effort to position Louisiana for aerospace and defense investment, while opponents from the Sierra Club warned that repeatedly broadening critical infrastructure could chill protest and free-speech activity. The bill was reported favorably. The committee then heard House Bill 1034, which authorizes local officials to declare temporary protection zones for public safety for up to 72 hours, with one extension. The sponsor and the Department of Economic Development said it would be a tool for aerospace and defense projects and other public-safety needs; ACLU testimony raised concerns about notice, property rights, and possible impacts on public waterways. The bill was also reported favorably. The committee next considered several criminal justice bills. House Bill 51, barring post-conviction bail for defendants convicted of aggravated offenses against children, and House Bill 55, limiting public disclosure of juror information to protect juror privacy, both received broad support and were reported favorably. House Bill 635, aimed at protecting Louisianians from transnational repression by foreign governments through penalty enhancements for underlying crimes, was supported by a national security advocate and reported favorably. House Bill 133, increasing penalties for students who commit attacks on teachers or other students, was amended to address juvenile procedure and exceptionalities; teachers testified about serious injuries they suffered, while the ACLU and criminal defense lawyers raised concerns about mandatory minimums and individualized sentencing. The bill was reported with amendments. The committee also heard House Bill 676, which creates the crime of fraudulent patient referrals, or “body brokering,” in the substance-use treatment industry. The sponsor and Blue Cross Blue Shield representatives described schemes that steer vulnerable patients into fraudulent treatment arrangements for profit; the bill was reported favorably. House Bill 159 created a Caddo Parish pilot program for pretrial home incarceration with electronic monitoring to reduce jail overcrowding. The sheriff said the jail is far over capacity and that the program would be limited to nonviolent, non-sex-offense defendants with risk assessments, court approval, and behavioral-health check-ins. Witnesses supported the concept but urged tighter liability language; the committee adopted an amendment and reported the bill with amendments. House Bill 106, dealing with unauthorized administration of melatonin to children in child care settings, was reported favorably. Later, the committee amended and reported House Bill 108, which changes juror qualifications to exclude people convicted of crimes of violence or sex offenses from criminal juries, after opponents argued it would unnecessarily bar citizens from jury service. House Bill 784, a cleanup bill on sex offender registration and notification, was amended and reported with technical changes. Senate Bill 388, which removes a trigger clause tied to a border compact and authorizes review of state contracts for foreign-adversary benefit, was amended and reported. Finally, House Bill 772, a bail-procedure reform requiring accurate mailing and electronic notice information and consolidating notice rules, was presented as a fairness and efficiency measure and had support from the bail industry and prosecutors; the transcript ends before final action on that bill.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 02/12/25

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> an independent board within the judicial an independent board within the judicial branch<00:19:33.320
  • This is organized by judicial district.
  • This is organized by judicial district.
  • </c><01:26:16.199><c> before</c> discouraging dangerous behaviors before discouraging dangerous behaviors
  • um which is going to address behavior um which is going to address driving<01:31:19.800><c> behavior
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • judicial officer funded.
  • We have our drug court judicial officers and we have our judicial officer, our public defender, our DA
  • Theodorovic, Director of Budget Services, Judicial Council, long-term Judicial Service Council member
  • I'm the Administrative Director of the Judicial Council.
  • We are grateful to the Judicial Council for its support.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Finance Nov 19th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're doing what we can to divert individuals out of the judicial system.
  • We're on to the fifth judicial district. We're ready when you are.
  • I am District Attorney Diana Luce from the 5th Judicial District.
  • January 1st is the CMO for the first judicial district.
  • This is about the same amount of cases as the four judicial districts.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • And certainly, if we continue to see an uptick and this sort of criminal behavior that I didn't know
  • Assembly Member DeMaio said that this kind of criminal behavior was something he did not know existed
  • adolescent bravado that do not inherently lead to violent behavior.
  • These developments... ...engage in risk behavior without fully understanding the implications.
  • This is about fairness in our judicial process.
Summary: The committee heard several public safety and privacy bills, with extensive testimony on each. AB 1872 by Assembly Member Ta would make repeat swatting a wobbler and require offenders to compensate victims for property damage. Supporters, including civil liberties, sheriff, and district attorney representatives, said swatting is a serious and growing threat to first responders, schools, and public officials. Opponents argued existing law already covers false emergency reports and warned the bill could worsen penalties for people with mental illness. The committee approved the bill on a do pass motion to Appropriations. AB 1727, also by Assembly Member Ta, would make it a misdemeanor to transfer or sell a person’s genetic data without consent. Supporters framed the bill as a needed privacy protection in light of advances in genetic technology and AI, citing examples such as HeLa cells and concerns about unauthorized DNA collection. Opponents, including ACLU Cal Action, said civil penalties already exist under current law and objected to creating a new carceral offense for nonviolent conduct. The committee accepted amendments and moved the bill forward as amended to the Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee. The committee then took up AB 1782 by Assembly Member DeMaio, which would lower the threshold for retaining certain offenders with mental health disorders in state hospital custody and broaden the conduct considered in dangerousness determinations. Supporters said the bill responds to a recent release case and would help prevent dangerous releases; opponents, including disability rights and public defender groups, said it would weaken due process and expand involuntary confinement. The chair recommended a no vote, and the bill remained on call after a split roll. AB 1632 by Assembly Member Johnson, which removes the notarization requirement for trespass authorization letters, passed as amended despite opposition from homelessness advocates and public defenders who said it could increase arrests of unhoused people; supporters said it would reduce bureaucracy and help property owners and police respond to trespassing. The committee also heard AB 1968 by Assembly Member Gallagher, which would add conspiracy to commit murder to the list of offenses eligible for heightened juvenile court handling; supporters cited a foiled school attack in Tehama County, while opponents warned of overbroad punishment and racial disparities. The bill was discussed but not yet voted on in the portion provided.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session Feb 11th, 2026 at 06:30 pm

Washington Senate Floor Meeting

WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session Feb 11th, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Washington Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • POINTER Study by the Alzheimer's Association suggests that healthy behaviors can actually prevent cognitive
  • Behaviors like eating well, exercise, good nutrition, and social interaction can help reduce cognitive
  • The Department of Health already educates the public about these behaviors.
  • What this bill is asking is that it simply ensures that people understand how these behaviors not only
  • And we had enacted this expedited review right soon after COVID to make sure that our judicial system
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session Feb 11th, 2026

Washington Senate Floor Meeting

Summary: The Senate convened with roll call, the colors presented by the Sons of the American Revolution Color Guard, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a prayer by Pastor Jesse Bradley. The journal was approved, and the chamber received House messages announcing passage of several bills, including House Bill 1687, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1960, House Bill 102, and Substitute House Bill 1. The Senate then adopted Senate Resolution 8684, which honored Washingtonians with ties to Team USA at the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games in Milano-Cortina. Senator Riccelli spoke in support, praising the athletes’ determination and Washington connections. The resolution passed by voice vote. The Senate next considered gubernatorial appointments. Brian C. Bennett was confirmed 49-0 as Director of the Washington State Lottery, with Senator Lovick speaking in support and highlighting Bennett’s public service and transition-team work. Angela Ramirez was then confirmed 49-0 as Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, with Senators Claire Wilson and Christian praising her experience, commitment, and attention to human services issues. After the confirmations, the Senate stood at ease for caucuses.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Crime and Public Safety Apr 14th, 2026

Crime and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Would this legislation then, I have a follow-up, would this legislation possibly help stop that behavior
  • We don't want, you know, drunken debauchery, but just human behavior.
  • Would this cause an offense because of that behavior?
  • And I think as a parent... ...the investigative process within our judicial system.
  • It is unhealthy to use to weaponize the investigative process of our judicial system against somebody
Summary: The Crime and Public Safety Committee met with a quorum and first went into executive session. In that session, members adopted a House Committee Substitute for Senate Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 87 and voted it do pass by an 8-0 roll call. The committee also adopted a House Committee Substitute for House Bills 1868 and 3257, which were combined into one bill string, and voted that substitute do pass 8-2. House Bill 3017 was then voted do pass 8-2 as well. The committee then moved to public hearing on House Bill 2808, which would create a new offense for an adult who knowingly permits, encourages, aids, or causes a minor to commit an offense. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address adults exploiting minors to commit crimes such as car theft, burglary, and theft, with penalties ranging from a class C misdemeanor if the minor commits a misdemeanor to a class A misdemeanor if the minor commits a felony, along with possible restitution. Members asked about whether the bill could reach parents at teen gatherings, how it would apply beyond parents to other adults or guardians, and how prosecutors would prove encouragement or causation. The sponsor responded that existing laws already cover some conduct like providing alcohol to minors, that the bill is meant to apply to any adult who encourages a minor, and that proof would rely on ordinary criminal standards such as text messages, emails, witness testimony, and other circumstantial evidence. One member raised concern that the language could be used to overreach against parents or be weaponized in investigations; the sponsor said the bill would only apply after the minor is adjudicated guilty and would be a secondary review of whether an adult caused the offense. No one signed up to testify in support, opposition, or for informational purposes, and the hearing on HB 2808 concluded without further action.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Crime and Public Safety Apr 14th, 2026

Crime and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Would this legislation then possibly help stop that behavior by holding the parent accountable if they
  • We don't want, you know, drunken debauchery, but just human behavior.
  • Would this cause an offense because of that behavior?
  • And I think as a parent... ...the investigative process within our judicial system.
  • It is unhealthy to use to weaponize the investigative process of our judicial system against somebody
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> to increase judicial and court safety. to increase judicial and court safety.
  • </c> safety resources for the judicial safety resources for the judicial branch. branch. branch.
  • </c><00:35:37.160><c> toward</c> uptick in threatening behavior toward uptick in threatening behavior
  • </c> their personal behaviors. their personal behaviors.
  • </c> Jennifer Super, who's our judicial Jennifer Super, who's our judicial branch's<00:37:44.120><c>
Summary: The Safety and Security Conference Committee met on May 13, 2026, with a quorum present and no immediate vote taken. Chairs explained the committee was working ahead of a possible target so it could act quickly later if needed, then proceeded with member introductions and a reminder about committee decorum. Staff noted a microphone delay and said the meeting would include a side-by-side walk-through of the House and Senate policy language and a review of the fiscal spreadsheet. Fiscal staff summarized major differences in court, public safety, and legislative security funding. The House and Senate proposals differed on safety and security funding for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and District Courts, as well as on courthouse grants, capital security enhancements, and a new legislative/protective services unit. Staff also reviewed Senate-only and House-only items, including a Senate proposal to require removal of insignia from public safety vehicles sold to the public, and House provisions for a security services task force and member security costs. Total general fund impacts were reviewed, with the House total corrected to include an open appropriation that had been omitted from the spreadsheet totals. Nonpartisan staff then walked through the policy differences. The Senate language focused on a Protective Services Unit and security for principal state officials, while the House language focused on a Legislative Services Unit and security for legislators. Both bills included provisions on Capitol Complex Security, reporting requirements, and reimbursement arrangements with local law enforcement, but differed on details such as whether elected officials must provide contact information to DPS and how requests for personal protective services are handled. The House-only amendment A8 was presented for discussion; it would revise emergency contact provisions, replace the House’s personal protective services request language with a more detailed threat assessment and mitigation framework, direct implementation of the new unit, and make related reimbursement and technical changes. Judge Richard Kyle, president of the Minnesota District Judges Association, testified in support of stronger judicial and court safety measures. He described rising threats against judges, citing survey results showing high rates of judges limiting personal information, receiving inappropriate communications, changing personal behavior, and experiencing threats to themselves and family members. He said the association supports legislative authorization and funding for home security and personal data protections for judicial officers, and emphasized that safety concerns for judges and court staff have become more serious in recent years.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • And certainly, if we continue to see an uptick and this sort of criminal behavior that I didn't know
  • Criminal behavior that I didn't know existed. Apparently, it's all new to me.
  • adolescent bravado that do not inherently lead to violent behavior.
  • These developments... ...engage in risk behavior without fully understanding the implications.
  • This is about fairness in our judicial process.
Committee: House Public Safety
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives Apr 8th, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, House Bill 352 is a cleanup bill to address behavioral health services and provider access in
  • would be the individual providing the behavioral plan, correct?
  • plan and providing the behavioral treatment, correct?
  • And is this regarding applied behavior analysis, or any type of behavioral intervention?
  • It's any type of behavioral health service. Okay, thank you, Representative Mack.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, my agency, the Council on Judicial Complaints, is the investigatory arm.
  • We existed within the judicial branch until 1999.
  • The reason for which the council put together this Judicial College.
  • And it is $60,000 for that five-day judicial college training.
  • Any questions about the judicial college before I move on? I have one.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> The Crittenden County Judicial Center. The Crittenden County Judicial Center.
  • Greenup County Judicial Center.
  • County Judicial Center.
  • </c> Greenup County Judicial Center. Greenup County Judicial Center.
  • </c><00:41:12.920><c> The</c> Knox County Judicial Center. The Knox County Judicial Center.
Summary: The Budget Review Subcommittee on Justice and Judiciary received an update from the Administrative Office of the Courts on implementation of House Bill 504, the judicial branch budget, and court facility projects. AOC leaders said they do not anticipate problems balancing the outgoing biennium or fiscal year 2026, and explained that the budget changes were driven by the need to reduce costs while preserving required constitutional, court-rule, and statutory services. They also said the new filing fee increases authorized by HB 504 took effect that day and are expected to generate up to $5 million, while the reorganization is projected to save about $3 million in general fund dollars. The bulk of the presentation focused on a major reorganization of the Office of Statewide Programs, which includes specialty courts, family and juvenile services, and pretrial services. AOC said the plan eliminates 170 positions and creates 109 new ones, mainly by reducing middle-management layers, expanding regional service delivery, and cross-training staff. Officials said 110 employees had already been offered or accepted placements, 24 had chosen voluntary separation, and the final number of employees leaving remains fluid until the process concludes around August 1. They emphasized that specialty court programs were not eliminated, but state-funded treatment court contracts and behavioral health liaison positions were removed, with treatment costs shifted to Medicaid or participants where appropriate. Members asked about the process, staffing impacts, specialty court participation, juvenile services, and how AOC will monitor the changes. AOC said the reorganization was developed by leadership, HR, and legal staff under direction of the Chief Justice and approved by the Supreme Court, and that it is intended to improve efficiency and frontline support rather than reduce services. They said specialty court participant levels are being watched closely, that CDW services will continue to use outside providers for programming, and that the agency will keep judges and stakeholders informed as the new structure goes into effect. No votes were taken, and the committee did not approve minutes because a quorum was not present.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • The issue of judicial security is prominent in the minds of many judicial officers, and recent events
  • The Judicial Council of California has made judicial security a legislative priority.
  • In recent years, it is true that the judicial branch...
  • The Judicial Council also approved a new rule of court and a standard of judicial administration on the
  • I'm grateful for the vision, dedication, and hard work of the judicial branch leaders and Judicial Council
Summary: The Legislature recessed into a joint convention for the 2026 State of the Judiciary, escorted the California Supreme Court justices to the rostrum, and heard remarks from legislative leaders and Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero. The speakers emphasized judicial independence, the rule of law, and the importance of the courts as a co-equal branch of government. The Chief Justice framed her address as a calm report on the judiciary’s work and major challenges, while thanking legislative and executive partners for collaboration. Chief Justice Guerrero highlighted several policy and operational issues facing the courts. She urged continued support for remote proceedings, noting more than 6 million remote hearings since 2022 and strong user satisfaction, and discussed the CARE Act’s statewide implementation, including petition and agreement numbers and the recent expansion to cover certain bipolar disorders. She also raised concerns about judicial security and privacy, threats and negative rhetoric toward judges, courthouse access issues tied to federal immigration enforcement, and the need for more judgeships and funding in high-need counties such as Riverside and San Bernardino. She also discussed the judiciary’s response to artificial intelligence, including guidance on generative AI, deepfakes, and evidence admissibility, and reported corrective actions after the troubled February 2025 bar exam, including scoring adjustments, expanded provisional licensing, and a return to in-person testing. Additional points included proposed ongoing funding for trial courts, long-standing judicial salary disparities, and the Judicial Council’s 100th anniversary. No votes were taken; the joint convention concluded with the address ordered printed in the Journal and an invitation to a reception for members and guests.