Transcript Highlights:

• And I'm also practicing certified in...
• and distinct professions with their own scope of practice.
• I practice currently in San Rafael, California, and San Francisco, where I have a broad-reaching practice
• But unfortunately, because of the current scope of practice that kind of keeps them from practicing at
• But unfortunately, because of the current scope of practice that kind of keeps them from practicing at

Transcript Highlights:

• Peters is here from the Forest Practices Board.
• None of us sit on Forest Practices, so I think we're trying to understand.
• The rule when it comes to forest practices will go into effect in August.
• The rule when it comes to forest practices will go into effect in August.
• The rule when it comes to forest practices will go into effect in August.

Summary: The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee heard public testimony on House Bill 2598, which would create a Salmon Advisory Commission made up of tribal leaders, state agencies, legislators, and local governments to develop recommendations on salmon and steelhead recovery. Prime sponsor Rep. Lekanoff described the bill as a way to bring executive, legislative, and tribal leaders together on salmon recovery and treaty obligations. Staff noted a fiscal note of roughly $35,000 in out years. Supporters emphasized salmon’s cultural and treaty importance and the need for coordinated leadership, while the lone public testifier, Todd Myers of Washington Policy Center, opposed the bill as another statewide layer of bureaucracy and argued that recovery efforts should focus more on local, watershed-level action. The committee noted 10 signed in pro, 886 con, and one other, but no vote was taken on the bill in the hearing. The committee then heard House Bill 2620, which would repeal the recently adopted Forest Practices Board rule expanding riparian buffers on non-fish-bearing streams and impose new standards for future riparian buffer rulemaking, including an economic viability standard for the timber industry and additional consensus and alternative-analysis requirements. Rep. Dent said the bill was intended to restore communication and collaboration in the forest practices process. Testimony was sharply divided. Tribal representatives and environmental advocates said the rule was the product of a long, science-based adaptive management process under the Forest and Fish framework and was needed to protect water quality, salmon habitat, and treaty rights; they argued the bill would undermine that process and conflict with Clean Water Act compliance. Forest industry and small forest landowner witnesses supported the bill, saying the process had lost trust, ignored alternatives, and imposed significant economic harm on rural communities and family tree farms. DNR and Ecology testified in opposition, saying the rule was based on science and that the bill would weaken water-quality protections and jeopardize HCP compliance. The committee recorded 592 signed in pro, 489 con, and one other, with no vote taken during the hearing. After the public hearings, the committee moved into executive session on five bills. Staff briefly described House Bill 2104, which would make permanent the Aviation Assurance Funding Program for wildfire response; House Bill 2348, a DNR request bill on land and material sales advertising; House Bill 2544, which would require an adjudication process for the Upper Columbia River with a proposed substitute; House Bill 2554, which would repeal Initiative 456 concerning state declarations on tribal natural resource management; and House Joint Memorial 4009, urging federal action on wildland firefighting consolidation. The committee then recessed briefly for caucus and began executive action, starting with a motion to report House Bill 2104 out of committee with a do pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• The practice that they implement on farms, we are all doing the same practices.
• The practice that they implement on farms, we are all doing the same practices.
• The practice that they implement on farms, we are all doing the same practices.
• The practice that they implement on farms, we are all doing the same practices.
• The practice that they implement on farms, we are all doing the same practices.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'm also practicing, certified in...
• and distinct professions with their own scope of practice.
• I practice currently in San Rafael, California, and San Francisco, where I have a broad-reaching practice
• But unfortunately, because of the current scope of practice that kind of keeps them from practicing at
• But unfortunately, because of the current scope of practice that kind of keeps them from practicing at

Summary: The joint Assembly and Senate business committees held a sunset review hearing for five California regulatory entities: the Respiratory Care Board, the California Council for Interior Design Certification, the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Hearing Aid Dispensers Board, the Board of Occupational Therapy, and the Board of Naturopathic Medicine. Each board or council described its licensing, enforcement, modernization, and consumer-protection work since the last review, and committee members focused on workforce access, transparency, fee authority, and whether current regulatory structures are appropriately tailored to public safety. For the Respiratory Care Board, the main issue was a proposal to move toward a bachelor’s degree requirement for licensure. Board representatives said the change would better align education with the complexity of care and could help the profession’s long-term status and reimbursement prospects, but Assembly Member Addis and others raised concerns about rural access, staffing shortages, and added barriers to entry. Public commenters, including respiratory therapists, families, and congregate living health facility operators, strongly opposed the degree mandate and urged continued use of LVNs for certain respiratory tasks in community settings. The board also discussed its ongoing work on LVN respiratory care issues, updated suctioning guidance, digitized licensing and enforcement systems, and fee cleanup language. The interior design item drew the most debate. CCIDC leaders defended the current title-act certification model, arguing it establishes competency without evidence of public harm and avoids the disruption a full licensure system could cause. Several committee members questioned the lack of enforcement authority, the private nonprofit structure, Bagley-Keene compliance, and whether certification meaningfully improves plan acceptance or public safety. Public testimony was split: supporters said the system works and preserves flexibility, while opponents argued the model lacks accountability, creates confusion, and does not reliably prevent plan-check denials or protect the public. The speech-language pathology/audiology board reported major modernization gains, including a new online licensure system, faster processing, continuing education audits, and updated supervision and advertising rules; it also received support for creating a new audiology assistant license category, while a consumer group urged more public members, proactive inspections, and faster discipline. The occupational therapy board reported growth, improved enforcement and licensing performance, and a need for additional fee authority to address rising costs, while public testimony supported reducing advanced practice hand therapy training hours. The final naturopathic medicine item began at the end of the transcript, but no substantive discussion was captured before the excerpt ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• In this illustrative example, in a platform practice of three physicians in one practice, depending on
• of a practice with two physicians, add-on acquisition of practice B of a solo practitioner, and add-on
• ><c> practice</c><00:03:51.599><c> medicine</c><00:03:52.000><c> doctrine,</c> corporate of practice
• </c><00:04:08.959><c> is</c> three physicians in one practice is three physicians in one practice is
• </c> practice C with four physicians. practice C with four physicians.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've also been a practicing optometrist for 24 years and a practice owner.
• I practice and live in Moorhead, Minnesota, but also practice in Wadena, Minnesota.
• or do practice County that have practice or do practice also<00:40:34.560><c> in</c><00:40:34.800><c
• </c> practice are. Thank you. Thank you Dr. practice are. Thank you. Thank you Dr.
• </c> full license to practice in Minnesota. full license to practice in Minnesota.

Committee: House Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Really prepared certified practices.
• Next up, we have HB 301 advanced practice.
• Advanced practice, registered nurses to engage an autonomous practice to provide mental health services
• So I speak from that practical experience as well.
• And once we get outside of that scope of practice, once we do get outside of the area where they're practicing

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> balanced approach to the data Practices balanced approach to the data Practices Act<00:02:09.200
• </c> central premise of the data Practices central premise of the data Practices Act<00:26:57.919><c>
• The Data Practices Act exists.
• The Data Practices Act exists.
• The Data Practices Act exists.

Transcript Highlights:

• As you can see, the schools we reviewed adopted most of these practices.
• We would like to go through three of the practices in more detail: Practice one, small groups, because
• We would like to go through three of the practices in more detail.
• Practice one, small groups because it's a straightforward example to describe.
• Two of the practices that stand out to me that I've seen firsthand.

Summary: The committee first heard a presentation from the State Auditor’s Office on its current performance audit work plan. The auditor described how topics are selected from a large pool of ideas and coordinated with JLARC to avoid duplication. Four ongoing audits were highlighted: Liquor and Cannabis Board operations, oversight of authorized entities serving students with disabilities, the long-term care provisions of Initiative 1163, and Medicaid managed care versus fee-for-service costs. Other planned topics included housing commission tenant ownership follow-up, DSHS vendor payment growth, implementation of the Since Time Memorial curriculum, and Washington State Ferries operations. Members asked about coordination with JLARC, and the auditor said the office regularly exchanges work plans and monthly updates with JLARC staff. The committee then received the State Auditor’s report on how charter schools identify and support at-risk students. Auditors reviewed four schools—Catalyst Public Schools, Innovation High School, Pinnacles Prep, and Rainier Prep—and focused on English language learners, homeless students, and special education students. The audit found that the schools met nearly all legal requirements reviewed and used many leading practices, including small-group instruction, culturally responsive environments, family engagement, and multi-tiered systems of support. The main recommendations were to improve documentation and written procedures so staff can apply practices more consistently. One area of partial compliance involved language access planning, and MTSS implementation varied across schools. Committee members asked why those four schools were selected, how the sample compared with district and statewide student populations, and whether the audit examined K-2 MTSS requirements. The auditor explained the schools were chosen for student need, geographic diversity, and authorizer representation, and that K-2 MTSS was not evaluated because only one school served those grades. Representatives from the Charter School Commission and charter school advocates responded positively, saying the report reflected strong practices and could help spread effective approaches. Public testimony from the Washington State Charter Schools Association and Excellent Schools Washington also supported the report and urged continued sharing of best practices across schools.

Transcript Highlights:

• Autonomous practice by Representative Shoaf.
• Advanced practice, registered nurses to engage an autonomous practice to provide mental health services
• Do not have a practicing psychiatrist.
• Let me briefly share an example from my practice.
• So they're not practicing outside the scope. They're still they're just not practice it.

Transcript Highlights:

• That's the practice of medicine.
• You can't, in my practice, your practice, warn a hospital and say, if such and such, do so-and-so.
• Whether you bill or do it for free, the practice of medicine remains the practice of medicine.
• In my practice,...
• Within their scope of practice and aligning with their clinical practice guidelines. Correct, yeah.

Committee: House Health and Welfare

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 611 by Rep. Freeman, which would require pregnancy-related service centers that provide health care services to be licensed or, as amended, to clearly disclose that they are not a licensed medical facility regulated by the Louisiana Department of Health. Rep. Freeman and supporting witnesses argued the bill was prompted by a legislative auditor report and concerns that some centers provide ultrasounds, STI testing, pregnancy tests, and related services without clear medical oversight. The Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners’ executive director testified that interpreting ultrasounds and performing certain tests can constitute the practice of medicine, while opponents argued the centers already operate under medical directors and that the disclosure requirement was unconstitutional under the NIFLA case. The committee adopted an amendment, but after debate on the amended bill, a motion to report favorably failed on a roll call vote, and the bill was voluntarily deferred. The committee then heard House Bill 902 by Rep. Marcelle, which directs the Louisiana Department of Health to develop trauma-informed training. Supporters said the bill grew out of a task force on student behavior, mental health, and discipline, and that educators need a more consistent, evidence-based trauma-informed curriculum than what is currently available online. Some members raised concerns about cost and whether the bill would mandate new school obligations, while a witness from the Louisiana Baptist Convention opposed the measure as mission creep and argued trauma-informed care is too specialized for general teacher training. Other members supported the bill as a way to help educators identify and respond to children facing trauma. The bill was amended with technical changes and then discussed further, but the transcript ends before a final vote on HB 902 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:02:40.920><c> Act</c> uh meaning of the uh data Practices Act uh meaning of the uh data Practices
• ><c> puts</c><00:03:09.400><c> a</c> Act uh the data Practices Act uh puts a Act uh the data Practices
• </c> particular section of the data Practices particular section of the data Practices Act<00:10:45.839
• </c> number of sections in the data Practice number of sections in the data Practice Act<00:14:48.320
• </c> central premise of the data Practices central premise of the data Practices Act<00:27:55.519><c>

Committee: House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:

• supervised practice they can get in the supervised practice they can get in the workforce<00:05:57.960
• No, there's no scope of practice changes. There's no changes to the practice of physical therapy.
• </c><00:09:04.600><c> is</c> in and their supervised practice is in and their supervised practice is
• </c><00:09:18.120><c> statute</c> so the supervised practice statute so the supervised practice statute
• </c><00:09:28.839><c> and</c> six months of supervised practice and six months of supervised practice

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Licensing and Occupations met on March 27, 2025, with a quorum present and first took up House Bill 255, relating to physical therapy. The bill sponsor and representatives of the Kentucky Board of Physical Therapy and APTA Kentucky said the measure is mainly a cleanup and modernization bill that updates outdated statutory language, changes PTAs from “certified” to “licensed,” gives the board authority to purchase liability insurance, moves fee and fine caps into regulation without changing current fees, renames temporary permits as provisional licenses, and creates a pathway to more easily recognize some internationally trained physical therapists already practicing in other states. Senators asked whether the bill changed training, scope of practice, Medicaid, or supervised practice standards; witnesses said it did not, and that supervised practice requirements remain in place with out-of-state practice accepted only when equivalent or more stringent. The committee approved HB 255 with favorable expression. The committee then considered House Bill 618, an alcoholic beverages measure with a Senate committee substitute. The bill was described as having three parts: allowing restaurants to buy limited quantities of alcohol from retail outlets to meet customer demand while keeping the three-tier system intact and requiring quarterly reporting; creating a temporary auctioneer license to auction previously retail-sold alcohol in original packaging, such as estate or bourbon collections; and giving quota bar license holders the same opportunity restaurants already have to sell barrel picks by the bottle. Testimony supported the bill as a way to help restaurants, auctioneers, and bars, while a senator raised a question about sales tax on auction sales and another noted that nonprofit or church-related alcohol auctions already require permits under existing law. One senator suggested future guardrails to encourage local purchasing, but no amendment was adopted. The committee passed HB 618 with favorable expression.

Transcript Highlights:

• You crafted some language that now is standard practice.
• Last but not least, we have HB 883, Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Autonomous Practice, by Representative
• But current law allows for advanced practice registered nurses to engage in autonomous practice of primary
• autonomous practice for psychiatric nurses.
• In Maryland, full practice authority since 2015...

Summary: The Health Professions and Programs Subcommittee heard and advanced several health care bills. HB 909, joining the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact, was presented with a strike-all amendment and reported favorably as amended by a 13-0 vote. HB 911, the related public records exemption protecting certain biological information, was also adopted and reported favorably as amended by a 14-0 vote. CS for HB 597, allowing schools to procure and administer glucagon for students with diabetes under trained personnel, passed unanimously 14-0 after a technical amendment. HB 519, aligning state law with federal language on controlled substances administered by paramedics, passed as amended 14-0. The committee then took up HB 919 on nursing education programs. Sponsor Rep. Overdorf argued the bill would create accountability for underperforming nursing schools by requiring remediation, tuition refunds in the lowest-performing programs, and public reporting of passage rates. Supporters said it would improve quality and protect students from debt without licensure success, while opponents from private nursing schools warned it could close programs and reduce nurse supply. After extensive debate, the bill was reported favorably 15-0. HB 1553, which would require health care providers to submit identified uterine fibroid data so the Department of Health can implement the research database previously authorized by law, passed unanimously 15-0. The final bill, HB 883, would allow psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners to practice autonomously; supporters said it would expand access to mental health care, especially in rural and underserved areas, while opponents raised concerns about quality and physician oversight. After lengthy testimony and debate, the bill was reported favorably 14-3.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, obviously consensus wasn't something at the Forest Practice Board.
• Peters is here from the Forest Practices Board.
• So for the rules, there's a number of forest practice rules.
• The rule when it comes to forest practices will go into effect in August.
• I served on the Forest Practices Board for 12 years.

Bills: HB2598 , HB2620 , HB2104 , HB2348 , HB2544 , HB2554 , HJM4009

Committee: House Agriculture & Natural Resources

Keywords: anadromous fish, environmental conservation, state coordination, wildlife recovery, fisheries management, forest management, natural resources, collaboration, forest practices, sustainability, aviation, wildland fires, funding, disaster relief, emergency response, timber sales, land sales, process efficiency, legislation, department language

Transcript Highlights:

• He returned to Danville, where he’s been practicing in private practice ever since.
• He has a wide practice experience. He brings to the table. He has a wide practice experience.
• So I've been practicing— So I've been practicing now for almost 23 years.
• Again, it's not the area I practice in, so we don't practice against each other.
• I could practice here.

Committee: House Courts of Justice

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:03:06.159><c> that</c> benefits of farming practices that benefits of farming practices that
• </c><00:03:25.319><c> and</c> the adoption of protective practices and the adoption of protective practices
• </c><00:03:40.200><c> that</c> are just some of the uh practices that are just some of the uh practices
• </c> engage farmers and Implement practices engage farmers and Implement practices is<00:10:30.800><c
• practices equipment to implement these practices it<01:10:27.320><c> sing</c><01:10:27.719><c> it</c

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:

• So by the mere fact of this legislation, it not only takes away our ability to practice our own practice
• So licensing this practice would be like regulating somebody's prayer or religious practice.
• So by the mere fact of this legislation, it not only takes away our ability to practice our own practice
• So licensing this practice would be like regulating somebody's prayer or religious practice.
• However, many of our practices, if they are practiced consistently, things like yoga, Tai Chi, Reiki,

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure

Summary: The committee opened a hearing of the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure and reviewed a broad agenda including credit card fees, event ticketing, music therapy licensure, senior psychologist licensure, CPA pathways, school mental health licensure, and a bill regulating alternative healing therapies. The chairs explained hearing logistics, including three-minute testimony limits and submission of written testimony, and noted that more than 70 people had signed up to testify. Legislators and advocates were heard out of order throughout the day. A major portion of the hearing focused on credit card surcharge and interchange legislation. Restaurant owners, the Massachusetts Restaurant Association, NFIB, and other small-business witnesses supported bills allowing merchants to add convenience fees and, in one proposal, preventing card companies from charging fees on tax and tip portions of transactions. They argued that swipe fees are a major and growing cost, especially for restaurants, and that Massachusetts is one of only two states that bars surcharges. Opponents from the Cooperative Credit Union Association, the Electronic Payment Coalition, and the Electronic Transactions Association warned that the proposals would create compliance burdens, fragment the payment system, raise legal preemption issues, and disrupt a system they described as efficient and secure. The committee also heard competing testimony on ticket transferability and ticket resale. Supporters, including the National Consumers League and Sports Fans Coalition, said bills on ticket transferability would protect consumers who cannot attend events and would increase competition and savings in the secondary market. Opponents, including United Musicians and Allied Workers and theater owners, argued that mandatory transferability would weaken artists’ and venues’ ability to prevent scalping and predatory resale, and that some ticket sellers should be exempt from the broader ticketing regulations. Separate testimony supported music therapy licensure, senior psychologist licensure, and new CPA education pathways, with witnesses saying these measures would expand access to care and strengthen the workforce while maintaining professional standards. The hearing also drew extensive opposition to S.261 on alternative healing therapies, with practitioners and clients arguing it would overregulate spiritual and holistic practices and was not an effective response to human trafficking concerns.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> on practice setting. on practice setting.
• . practices. practices.
• . practice. practice.
• > practice under a collaborative practice practice under a collaborative practice agreement<03:27:19.200
• </c> internal in in my practices. internal in in my practices.

Committee: House Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• So right now, if you are a practicing physician in another country, you may have practiced for 20 years
• So right now, if you are a practicing physician in another country, you may have practiced for 20 years
• </c> preventing people from practicing preventing people from practicing medicine<00:02:21.959><c> uh
• </c><00:02:33.280><c> medicine</c> Minnesota who cannot practice medicine Minnesota who cannot practice
• physician will practice the practicing physician will practice generally<00:09:41.320><c> under</c><

Committee: Senate State and Local Government