Video & Transcript : 'intelligence' :
Page 20 of 192
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session Mar 5th, 2026
California Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- I've been experimenting with artificial intelligence and what you see here is a hologram of me.
- I've been experimenting with artificial intelligence and what you see here is a hologram of me, and this
- meeting is going to be run entirely by artificial intelligence.
- business and my experiment has been entirely successful, no hallucinations from my artificial intelligence
Summary:
The Senate convened with a quorum present, heard a prayer and pledge, welcomed a seventh-grade class from Contra Costa Jewish Day School, and made routine announcements. The body then took up two resolutions on the floor: SR 82 by Senator Pérez recognizing Children’s Dental Health Month and emphasizing the importance of early oral health, Medi-Cal dental access, and disparities in childhood tooth decay; and SR 84 by Senator Caballero recognizing Women in Construction Week and calling attention to workforce shortages, apprenticeship pathways, and the need to expand opportunities for women in the trades.
Both resolutions were adopted unanimously by roll call vote, with 31 ayes and 0 nos. Senators also announced upcoming budget subcommittee meetings, including hearings on the Office of Emergency Services and the Department of Justice. The chamber then heard several adjourn-in-memory requests, including one for the victims of a fatal avalanche near Truckee and another for Camille Moran of San Francisco, a transgender advocate and artist.
The presiding officer noted a birthday for Senator Hurtado and made lighthearted remarks about an “artificial intelligence” experiment running the meeting. The Senate announced it would remain in recess until later in the day for an adjournment motion and would reconvene on Monday, March 9, 2026, at 2 p.m.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session Mar 5th, 2026
California Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- I've been experimenting with artificial intelligence, and what you see here is a hologram of me.
- I've been experimenting with artificial intelligence, and what you see here is a hologram of me, and
- this meeting is going to be run entirely by artificial intelligence.
- business and my experiment has been entirely successful, no hallucinations from my artificial intelligence
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee Apr 6th, 2026
Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- As we are well aware, artificial intelligence has quietly embedded itself into nearly every corner of
- Comment letters in opposition, about 20,000 of which were generated by artificial intelligence systems
- It is the use of artificial intelligence where there is not a connection to a human, where the human
- Advancements in artificial intelligence have led to the creation of synthetic performers.
- Thank you. the bill summary requires the advertisements to use an artificial intelligence generate a
Summary:
The committee convened for its first hearing, took roll, and heard several privacy- and AI-related bills. SB 1106 by Senator Cabaldon would shorten the Delete Act data broker deletion deadline from 45 days to 30 days; it drew support from a technology and democracy group, no opposition testimony, and was moved out on a due pass to Appropriations vote. SB 923 by Senator Becker would expand the CCPA deletion right to cover all personal information held by a business and require online-only businesses to offer a web form or similar method for privacy requests; supporters included the California Privacy Protection Agency and privacy advocates, while business groups raised concerns about scope, compliance, and the email/web-form requirement. The bill passed 6-0 to Appropriations, with some members noting they were laying off or wanted further amendments.
The committee also heard SB 1142, the Digital Dignity Act, which would regulate digital replicas and deepfakes on large online platforms, including takedown and revocation procedures and penalties. Supporters said it would protect Californians from fraud, harassment, and nonconsensual synthetic likeness use; opponents, including the Motion Picture Association, CCIA, TechNet, and others, raised First Amendment, due process, Section 230, and overbreadth concerns, especially around deceased persons and the 48-hour takedown process. Members said they supported the bill but wanted further work before Judiciary, and it passed 6-0 as amended to Judiciary. The committee also adopted its rules without objection.
Later, SB 867 by Senator Padilla would impose a four-year moratorium on the sale and manufacture of AI chatbot-powered toys for children, citing research showing unsafe, sexually explicit, or privacy-invasive behavior; child advocacy and consumer groups supported it, while retailers and civil justice groups sought narrower definitions and liability protections. It passed 7-0 to Appropriations. SB 1247 would give child influencers, once adults, a right to request deletion or modification of images and likenesses used in monetized social media content; it drew no support testimony but was opposed by a civil justice group over the creation of a new private right of action, and it passed 7-0 to Judiciary. SB 930, the consent-calendar item, was approved 7-0.
The committee then heard SB 1114, which would restrict sharing of state-collected data related to LGBTQ Californians absent an enforceable order, with supporters arguing it would protect sensitive data from misuse by federal agencies and preserve trust in state programs. It passed 6-0 to Appropriations. SB 1159 would let local governments treat AI bots and agents differently from people for Brown Act, public records, and related civic participation laws, in response to AI-generated comment floods; supporters from environmental, local government, and nonprofit groups said it was needed to preserve human participation, while opponents argued the bill should focus on fraud rather than AI and warned about overreach. The bill passed 9-0 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 1050 would require disclosures when synthetic performers are used in advertisements; labor and consumer advocates supported it as a truth-in-advertising measure, while media and industry groups objected that it was overbroad and should be narrowed to misleading ads and aligned with existing law. Members signaled support for the bill’s goal but also raised concerns about scope and consistency with current false-advertising rules.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Formal House Session 52 Jun 4th, 2026
Massachusetts House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Mentioning artificial intelligence, AI, it's possible.
- Mentioning artificial intelligence, AI, it's powered on data.
- Mentioning artificial intelligence, AI, it's powered on data.
- And strong data privacy laws are even more necessary because how thirsty artificial intelligence platforms
- The bill also includes an important feature to combat the rise of artificial intelligence: the right
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- and</c><00:10:35.519><c> housing</c> S. 241, an act relating to regulating the use of artificial intelligence
- the first reading of the bill. >> S. 241, an act relating to regulating the use of artificial intelligence
- to regulating the use<00:12:25.360><c> of</c><00:12:25.519><c> artificial</c><00:12:26.079><c> intelligence
- </c><00:12:26.720><c> in</c><00:12:26.880><c> the</c> use of artificial intelligence in the use of artificial
- intelligence in the provision<00:12:27.519><c> of</c><00:12:27.760><c> mental</c><00:12:28.160><c> health
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee Jul 16th, 2025
Privacy and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- And Shoshana—Rosemary is absolutely right—brought intelligence, determination, and patience.
- The rise of artificial intelligence presents a lot of opportunity for innovation.
- SB 11 addresses the misuse of artificial intelligence technology by establishing guardrails.
- Help ensure that artificial intelligence tools in health care are used safely and equitably.
- We addressed that issue earlier in the year with the definition of artificial intelligence.
Committee:
House Privacy and Consumer Protection
Summary:
The committee heard several bills on consumer protection, privacy, AI, and employment technology. SB 53 by Senator Wiener would require large AI developers to disclose safety and security protocols, report serious incidents quickly, and create CalCompute and whistleblower protections; supporters said it is a transparency-based, narrower follow-up to SB 1047, while industry groups opposed unless amended over concerns about size-based thresholds, trade secrets, and security. SB 766 by Senator Allen would codify FTC car-sales rules and create a three-day cooling-off period for certain used-car purchases; testimony was broadly supportive, and several dealer and industry groups moved from opposition to neutral after amendments. The committee also heard SB 7 by Senator McNerney, which would require notice and human oversight for automated decision-making in employment, and SB 833 by the same author, which would require human review and monitoring for AI use in critical infrastructure; both drew support from labor and consumer advocates and opposition or concerns from business and public-sector groups about scope and compliance. The committee also began hearing SB 11 on AI-generated voice/image/video cloning and nonconsensual deepfakes, with supporters backing consumer warnings and liability rules and opponents seeking narrower language and lower penalties.
Members and witnesses repeatedly emphasized the need to balance innovation with safety, with supporters arguing California should act where Congress has not, and opponents urging narrower definitions, stronger trade-secret protections, and more limited enforcement. On SB 53, committee members praised the author’s outreach but noted the bill still needs work; the bill was moved out on a do-pass-as-amended motion with seven votes and held open for absent members. SB 766 received unanimous support after amendments and was reported out 9-0. SB 7 and SB 833 were both advanced on do-pass motions but were left open with only partial vote counts at the time of the hearing. The committee later recessed and returned to continue the agenda.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine the nomination of Russell Vought, of Virginia, to be Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Jan 22nd, 2025
Senate Budget
Transcript Highlights:
- Probably the most important thing I've done in this job is my work with the intelligence community.
- We've got thousands of men and women who work in the intelligence community without a lot of fanfare.
- Your idea of going on this ideological jihad to break up the intelligence community's effectiveness?
- And this idea of bringing trauma to the federal workforce by taking the intelligence community, which
- all for effectiveness, but you're going to be willing to commit not to undermine our national intelligence
Committee:
Senate Senate Budget
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Technology and Telecommunications 2ND REVISED Apr 16th, 2026
Technology and Telecommunications
Transcript Highlights:
- House Bill 3176 creates the Oklahoma Gas Artificial Intelligence and Space Research Hub, or Gas Hub,
- But House Bill 3176 creates the Oklahoma Gas Artificial Intelligence and Space Research Hub or Gas Hub
- Members, House Bill 3544 pertains to artificial intelligence social companions.
- And so what House Bill 3544 seeks to do is to prohibit minor access to artificial intelligence social
- companions. ...prohibit minor access to artificial intelligence social companions.
Committee:
Senate Technology and Telecommunications
Summary:
The Senate Technology and Telecommunications Committee considered several House bills focused on artificial intelligence, data infrastructure, broadband, and education technology. House Bill 3176 would create an Oklahoma Gas Artificial Intelligence and Space Research Hub under the Department of Commerce and a National Laboratory Development Program to help Oklahoma pursue federal research designations; members questioned the fiscal impact, public reporting, and agency placement, and the bill passed 7-1. House Bill 3544 would prohibit minors from accessing AI social companions and authorize civil penalties; supporters cited research and safety concerns, and it passed 8-0. House Bill 3619 would modernize state geographic data collection and mapping for census and boundary purposes; members raised concerns about county boundaries, costs, and possible impacts on property and taxation, and it passed 6-2.
The committee also advanced House Bill 3546, which bars artificial intelligence and other non-human entities from being granted legal personhood under Oklahoma law, passing 8-0 without debate. House Bill 1782 would create an Oklahoma AI Education Innovation Act with an advisory council and grant fund; members asked about funding formulas, membership, and dual office-holding, and it passed 8-0. House Bill 2293 would extend the Oklahoma Broadband Office sunset while requiring a wind-down plan and legislative review; members discussed the office’s consultation and termination process, and it passed 8-0.
Finally, House Bill 4358 would limit screen time for pre-K through fifth grade students to one hour per school day. After questions about enforcement, classroom logistics, and special events, the author struck the title to continue working on the measure, and the bill passed 8-0. Throughout the meeting, members generally expressed support for the policy goals of the bills while flagging implementation, fiscal, and jurisdictional concerns.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- This bill relates to artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence is here.
- It's Artificial intelligence is here. It's being used in the classroom by students.
- This is important to insert a sentence that says ensure no generative artificial intelligence replaces
- The first amendment would insert a sentence ensuring no generative artificial intelligence replaces or
- I was fortunate to work with the State of Idaho Artificial Intelligence Task Force, and the team represented
Committee:
House Education
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee and Senate Judiciary Committee Dec 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- challenges that exist with copyright and protecting the creative works in this age of artificial intelligence
- And on the other, we want to make sure that artificial intelligence in that industry continues to thrive
- Ross Intelligence case is now pending before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
- I think we'll know more after the appellate decision in the Ross Intelligence case, which is now before
- I'm a senior research scholar at Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
Summary:
The Senate Judiciary Committee and Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee held an informational hearing at Stanford on the intersection of artificial intelligence, copyright, transparency, and California’s creative economy. Chairs and members emphasized that the hearing was not on a specific bill and would not include a vote, but was intended to gather information ahead of the next legislative session. Opening remarks stressed the tension between protecting artists’ intellectual property and allowing AI innovation to continue in California, with several members noting the state’s outsized role in both the tech and entertainment sectors.
The first panel featured Professor Pamela Samuelson and Stanford researcher Rishi Bommasani. Samuelson reviewed the current copyright litigation landscape, including dozens of lawsuits against generative AI companies, and explained that fair use will likely be central, especially the market-effects factor. She said state action is constrained by federal copyright preemption, but transparency, privacy, and deepfake-related regulation may still be possible. Bommasani described widespread opacity around training data among major California AI companies, discussed AB 2013 and the EU AI Act as transparency models, and warned that disclosure rules face enforcement and design challenges. Members asked about market dilution theories, open-source models, user data, machine unlearning, and what California can do without conflicting with federal law.
The second panel included SAG-AFTRA board member Jason George, Animation Guild president Danny Lynn, and OpenAI copyright counsel Mark Gray. George and Lynn argued that AI training on performers’ and artists’ work without consent or compensation is already harming careers, devaluing creative labor, and enabling digital replicas and style imitation; both supported stronger transparency so rights holders can identify when their work is used and negotiate licenses. Gray said AI is increasingly being used as a productivity tool and pointed to growing partnerships between AI companies and publishers, studios, and record labels, while acknowledging concerns about deepfakes and specific harmful uses. Committee members pressed him on labeling AI-generated content, training-data disclosure, and how to protect creators while still encouraging innovation. No formal action or vote was taken.
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- Now, in 2017, a national intelligence law in China said that any Chinese person or entity has to share
- information to which they gain access with the Chinese military and intelligence establishment.
- scholarships from the Chinese Communist Party, and they are choosing the, let's say, arguably intelligence
- If there's any apparatus of the federal government that I do have confidence in, it's the intelligence
- If there's any apparatus of the federal government that I do have confidence in, it's the intelligence
Committee:
House Education
Keywords:
HR171, House Resolution 171, M.J. Foster Promise Program, TOPS-Tech, TOPS Tech Award, Board of Regents, Louisiana Works, Louisiana Community and Technical College System, LCATCS, financial aid, scholarship, workforce development, career training, technical education, vocational education, postsecondary credential, associate degree, industry-based credential, high-demand jobs, high-wage occupations
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine the nomination of Lieutenant General John D. Caine (Retired), to be general and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Defense. Apr 1st, 2025 at 08:30 am
Subcommittee on Personnel
Transcript Highlights:
- So for your service at times in the intelligence community where your reputation is as strong as it is
- The defense against that eventuality, which I think is absolutely terrifying, is intelligence.
- And I hope that you will continue to focus the forces in the Pentagon on intelligence. intelligence and
- One of the things we hear over and over from commanders, of course, is that intelligence, surveillance
- It had the head of intelligence. It had the head of the CIA. It had our Secretary of Defense.
Committee:
Senate Subcommittee on Personnel
Keywords:
national security, military readiness, Kane nomination, defense budget, China threats, Russia, collaboration, modernization
Summary:
The meeting centered on the nomination of retired Lieutenant General Dan Kane for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delving into various security concerns and the strategic environment facing the U.S. today. Testimonies highlighted the growing threats from adversaries such as China and Russia, with discussions around the necessity of maintaining and modernizing military capabilities to address these challenges. The need for agility in military operations and enhancing collaboration among various defense agencies was underscored. Further, concerns were raised regarding the defense budget and the importance of a strong national defense strategy were prevalent throughout the discussions. The committee members collectively emphasized the need for superior readiness and modernization to keep pace with global threats.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 3/24/25
Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Artificial intelligence<00:30:22.000><c> is</c><00:30:22.240><c> a</c><00:30:22.480><c> powerful</c><
- tool to fight intelligence is a powerful tool to fight fraud,<00:30:24.399><c> but</c><00:30:24.640>
- intelligence to flag anomalies<00:30:34.799><c> for</c><00:30:35.120><c> Medicaid</c><00:30:35.600><
- 30:50.559><c> data</c> artificial intelligence and data artificial intelligence and data management,<
- artificial intelligence fraud The artificial intelligence fraud prevention<00:31:13.120><c> tool</c><
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 23rd, 2026 at 09:13 am
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- Artificial intelligence-powered data systems, can you tell me a little bit more about that?
- Artificial intelligence-powered data systems, can you tell me a little bit more about that?
- And so we can move on to intelligence. I want to stop there.
- Line 20, intelligence-led policing. The executive recommendation is $5.224 million.
- Thank you, Madam Chair, line 20, intelligence-led policing.
Committee:
House House Appropriations & Finance
Summary:
The meeting began as an informal education budget work group focused on reviewing a revised House Appropriations and Finance Committee scenario and flagging concerns rather than taking votes. Staff outlined the main changes from the LFC recommendation, including moving the statewide student information system appropriation, adding funding for the Black, Bilingual, Multicultural and Hispanic Education Act, universal school meals overrun costs, an evidence-based CTE pilot with a 50% local match, STEM network funding, wellness room pilots, Martinez-Yazzie action plan items, and changes to innovation zone and out-of-school time appropriations. A separate handout on the seven-year CTE pilot explained spending patterns, reversions, and possible federal maintenance-of-effort concerns if the state continues funding beyond a true pilot. Members then debated CTE extensively, with several arguing it improves attendance, graduation, and career readiness and should be sustained or expanded, especially in rural areas, while staff and others emphasized that much of the current funding has gone to general operational costs rather than intentional program design and that regional or matched funding models may be more effective. Members also discussed STEM and math initiatives, the need for more industry involvement, and whether the proposed match requirements would be too burdensome for smaller districts and BIE schools.
The discussion also covered the Black, Hispanic, and Multilingual Education Acts and the Martinez-Yazzie lawsuit. Some members stressed that the acts should be explicitly named in the budget language and not merely implied, while staff said the scenario reaffirms prior commitments by building the costs into agency operating budgets. Members raised concerns about charter school hold-harmless funding, declining enrollment, and the need to align spending with the needs of at-risk students. The work group ended the education portion without any votes, with staff noting they would incorporate the feedback and return with clarifications, including on CTE funding, the educational acts, and the charter hold-harmless item.
The meeting then shifted to the child well-being and early childhood work group, where staff presented a revised Early Childhood Education and Care Department scenario. The proposal moved money toward child care assistance and early pre-K, kept the FIT program funding level unchanged, and used a mix of trust fund, TANF, federal, and operating-budget adjustments to close part of the gap between the executive and LFC recommendations. Members questioned the policy direction, especially the shift toward infant and toddler care and pre-K expansion, the impact on school-age child care, and the implications for continuity of care and provider costs. Staff explained that the scenario prioritizes younger children and at-risk families, includes language for a wage and career ladder, and would require legislation to raise the early childhood trust fund distribution cap from 500 to 525. Members also discussed a separate proposed CYFD pilot bill (HB 65), which would be distinct from ECECD funding. No votes were taken, and staff said they would return with more cost information on full pre-K plus wraparound care.
A final work group reviewed C2 and Department of Information Technology-related appropriations. Staff compared the LFC and executive recommendations for new funding and reauthorizations, noting that the LFC generally limited new projects while the executive funded more. Members discussed several IT modernization requests, including the Secretary of State’s voter registration and election management systems, the Spaceport Authority, Game and Fish, the State Engineer’s WATERS system, ECECD’s FitKids and EPIC replacement discovery, and Aging and Long-Term Services’ enterprise system modernization. The main themes were whether to fund planning versus full replacement, how to avoid piecemeal spending, and whether new systems should wait for incoming leadership. The Secretary of State’s office said its system is nearing end of life and the planning funds would help prepare a realistic replacement request, while other agencies described aging infrastructure, cybersecurity risks, and the need for modernization. The work group did not vote on any of the items and ended with staff noting additional follow-up on funding needs and reauthorization details.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Assembly Education Committee and Senate Education Committee Jan 20th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm about to be the chair of the committee that oversees AI and artificial intelligence and social media
- So I'm about to be the chair of the committee that oversees AI and artificial intelligence and social
- media and other issues. and folks who said, well, you know, an artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence
- We represent the artificial intelligence and classrooms group. We are living in the future.
- 2029, the start of the 2029 school year, in order to establish clear standards for artificial intelligence
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Assembly Education Committee and Senate Education Committee Jan 20th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- So I'm about to be the chair of the committee that oversees AI and artificial intelligence and social
- So I'm about to be the chair of the committee that oversees AI and artificial intelligence and social
- media and other issues. and folks who said, well, you know, an artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence
- We represent the artificial intelligence and classrooms group. We are living in the future.
- We represent the artificial intelligence and classrooms group. We are living in the future.
Summary:
The joint Senate and Assembly Education Committee hearing featured opening remarks from legislators welcoming students from the California Association of Student Councils and SABLE, with members emphasizing student voice and noting that several past student proposals had become law. The hearing then moved through multiple student panels presenting policy ideas, with members responding in a mix of support, technical questions, and cautions about cost, implementation, and tradeoffs in instructional time.
The first panel proposed an annual civic engagement day for grades 7-12 to increase civic literacy and participation through flexible school-based activities. Members asked about costs, flexibility for sixth grade, voter registration, and how the proposal would fit within existing curriculum and standards. The second panel proposed amending Education Code Section 35012 to require at least one student board member in every unified and high school district, with added motioning rights and training on budgeting and LCAPs; members raised concerns about mandate costs, board size, and the scope of motioning authority. The third panel proposed middle school financial literacy instruction, potentially embedded in existing classes like math, with a 10-year phase-in for teacher training and curriculum updates; members questioned whether the state should wait for the already-approved high school financial literacy course to be implemented first.
The fourth panel proposed expanding restorative justice by creating a CDE task force and authorizing PPS-certified staff to use restorative justice materials in discipline processes; members discussed prior legislation, confidentiality in expulsion hearings, and the likely cost of a state task force. The fifth panel proposed short, twice-a-semester mental health and life-skills sessions for grades 7-12, but members expressed skepticism that brief classroom sessions could meaningfully address mental health needs and suggested wellness centers or student-led awareness efforts instead. The hearing then began panel six on AI implementation in classrooms, with students arguing that districts need clearer guidance on AI use and that education must adapt rather than ignore the technology.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, July 13, 2026)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><05:02:53.120><c> Despite</c><05:02:53.520><c> their</c> intelligence analysis.
- Despite their intelligence analysis.
- </c><05:04:12.798><c> and</c> within the Office of Intelligence and within the Office of Intelligence
- DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis, also known as INA, is the only entity in the U.S. intelligence
- </c><05:06:32.878><c> counterparts</c> federal intelligence counterparts federal intelligence counterparts
Bills:
HB8897 , HB3106 , HR1398 , HB8738 , HB3535 , HB7574 , HB8535 , HB8168 , HB9388 , HB9391 , HB8874 , HB9328 , HB8770 , HB7809 , HB6332
Keywords:
FEC, Federal Election Commission, campaign finance, electioneering communications, political committees, electronic filing, e-filing, disclosure reports, campaign reporting, disbursements, checkless payments, payment methods, administrative reform, election law, FECA, 52 U.S.C. 30104, 52 U.S.C. 30102, campaign administration, political spending, Department of Homeland Security
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Appropriations Jan 26th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Second substitute House Bill 1170 relates to generative artificial intelligence.
- staff to this committee, briefing you on substitute House Bill 1833, which creates an artificial intelligence
- By way of brief background, artificial intelligence, or AI, is understood in several ways.
- staffed this committee briefing you on substitute House Bill 1833, which creates an artificial intelligence
- By way of brief background, artificial intelligence or AI is understood in several ways.
Summary:
The House Appropriations Committee held public hearings on several bills related to artificial intelligence, student employee bargaining, and online safety. For HB 1170, staff explained that the bill would require certain large generative AI providers to offer provenance detection tools and include latent or optional manifest disclosures in AI-generated audio, image, and video content, with enforcement by the Attorney General under the Consumer Protection Act. Committee discussion focused on whether the bill would apply to AI-generated text code, and staff clarified that it would not. Testimony from the Washington Technology Industry Association opposed the bill as written, citing enforcement ambiguity, definition changes, and interoperability concerns, while noting support for continued work on the issue.
For HB 1570, staff described the underlying bill as extending collective bargaining rights under the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act to student employees at several state higher education institutions, with a striking amendment narrowing the bill to non-academic student employees at Western Washington University and listing covered job classifications. Staff estimated the original bill’s fiscal impact at about $1.5 million per biennium, reduced to roughly $200,000 per biennium under the striking amendment. Testimony from labor and student representatives supported the narrowed bill, emphasizing student worker safety, organizing support, and the need to move forward after prior union votes.
The committee also heard substitute HB 1833, which would create the Spark Act grant program in the Department of Commerce to support innovative uses of AI, with grants requiring a state benefit and shared technology, and with Commerce consulting the Attorney General’s AI Task Force. Staff estimated administrative costs of about $160,000 per year plus grant funding that could bring total annual program costs to roughly $660,000 to $1.6 million. Representative Keaton said an amendment would update dates and incorporate changes. Testimony was generally supportive from industry and retail representatives, who framed the bill as a pro-innovation public-private partnership.
Finally, the committee heard a proposed third substitute for HB 1834, which would prohibit addictive feeds for minor users and restrict push notifications during evening and school hours unless parents consent, while allowing all users to limit feeds and privacy settings. Supporters, including the Attorney General’s Office, Children’s Alliance, and a parent who lost a child to social media harms, argued the bill would protect children and reduce behavioral health costs. Opponents from technology, civil liberties, and industry groups raised constitutional, privacy, and vagueness concerns, warning that age determination could function like age verification and that the bill could restrict access to beneficial content. No votes or executive action were taken; the committee concluded public hearings and announced amendment deadlines for upcoming executive sessions.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
December 9, 2025 - 12:30 PM
Transcript Highlights:
- INCREASING USE OF ALGORITHMS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CLAIMS HANDLING PROCESS.
- THE DEFINITION REGARDING THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM. THAT'S WHAT I'M REFERRING TO.
- WHERE YOU DEFINE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THIS IS SIMILAR TO WHAT I WAS LOOKING IN THE AI – WHAT YOU HAVE
- TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE – IT APPLIES TO ALL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. THAT IS WHAT I WAS AFRAID TO.
- WORKERS AROUND THE WORLD THEN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations - Room 216, 24 February, 2026; 1:30 PM
Appropriations
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:08:50.000><c> in</c> forward with artificial intelligence in forward with artificial intelligence
- . intelligence. intelligence.
- . intelligence. intelligence.
- for the state of artificial intelligence for the state of Mississippi<00:20:58.640><c> is</c><00:20:
- We are at the beginning of doing cloud right, doing artificial intelligence right, doing procurement
Committee:
Joint Appropriations