Video & Transcript Research : 'budget amendment'

Page 20 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Jan 30th, 2026 at 09:10 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do we need to have a constitutional amendment?
  • Do we need to have a constitutional amendment?
  • Senator Solz's constitutional amendment.
  • My guess is LFC would present an education budget and LESC would present an education budget.
  • My guess is LFC would present an education budget and LESC would present an education budget.
Bills: SB104, SJR3, SM3
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair moves that Senate Bill 1062 without amendments be reported favorably the full House recommendation
  • It waives governmental immunity, costing taxpayers even more in legal fees and draining local budgets
  • With that context, are you aware of concerns that referencing or amending the 1925 ban in new legislation
  • OK, so, um, shifting gears in 2003 when the wrongful death statute was amended to allow lawsuits related
  • Um, there was a wrongful death statute in 2003, and it was amended to allow lawsuits related to pregnancy
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Feb 27th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • rules, and federal laws are issued that chip away at sovereignty granted to the states by the 10th Amendment
  • come in and do some sort of legal action against our prosecutors, uh, it, it, it can break, bust the budget
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 18th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, in our current state code, it amends the electronic registration information center, which is a
  • I guess, is this an amendment to our constitution in terms of navigable ways? No, no, no.
Bills: SB5, SB142, SB158, SB171, SB5
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • additional amendment?
  • AO to amend it.
  • yesterday and um and this amendment yesterday and um and this amendment doesn't<01:09:03.440>
  • chair um I'll note that this amendment chair um I'll note that this amendment was<01:09:37.920><
  • The Chair put the A3 amendment to a vote, and it was adopted. The bill was amended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Mar 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, the balanced budget amendment is extremely important.
  • But there is no balanced budget amendment in the Constitution.
  • Fifteen years, I couldn't even get a hearing on a resolution for a balanced budget amendment.
  • A balanced budget amendment, maybe they should have done term limits.
  • We should continue to push specifically, like I do, for the balanced budget amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Mar 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 1127, without amendments, be reported favorably to the full House with a recommendation that
  • Representative McQueeney moves that House Bill 1393, without amendment, be reported favorably. to the
  • Representative Anchía moves that House Bill 1640, without amendment, be reported favorably to the full
  • Representative Meck offers up a discussion of the bill. moves that House Bill 2152, without amendment
  • in Texas, though we may not always agree on how to allocate the money that we have passed in our budget
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I believe there's an amendment we need. The clerk will read the amendments.
  • The amendment, Mr.
  • Amendment, clerk will read the second amendment. Mr.
  • Amendment is that right? There is a question on the amendments. This is a question amendment.
  • I believe there's an amendment. The clerk will read the amendment.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And in House Bill 3413, we open Title 62 Public Finance and we ask that within October, agency budget
  • or over budget or under budget.
  • There's an amendment I'd like to adopt. Clerk will read. Mr.
  • the following language amendment submitted by Representative Caldwell Chad.
  • That would be the order on the bill as amended. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Human Committee Meeting - 2026-04-14

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The A1 amendment is adopted. Representative Duran, to your bill as amended. >> All right.
  • Representative to your amendment. Representative to your amendment.
  • The amendment is adopted. Same sign. The amendment is adopted.
  • Representative Ryer to your amendment. Representative Ryer to your amendment.
  • So when you have forecasted forecasted forecasted budgets budgets budgets within<01:20:33.199> health
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Apr 7th, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do have an amendment at the desk.
  • That concludes the explanation of the amendment. Will there be questions on the amendment?
  • Seeing no questions, will there be debate on the amendment?
  • Do we have questions on the amendment? Seeing no questions, will there be debate on the amendment?
  • I know we're outside of the amendment process, but is it possible to get a printed copy of that amendment
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/10/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • amendments to the amendment that's amendments to the amendment that's before<01:01:17.000> us
  • amendment does. amendment does.
  • speak to the amendment speak to the amendment as<01:05:11.920> amended?
  • So, we are back on the A2 amendment as amended by the oral amendments.
  • So, we are back on the A2 amendment as amended by the oral amendments.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from March 5 by voice vote and welcomed new member Representative Van Binsbergen. It then took up House File 2354, which Chair Liebling moved to re-refer to the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee. Representative Norris presented the bill as an updated version of the Medical Assistance Protection Act, aimed at strengthening the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, closing loopholes, equalizing fraud penalties, and increasing penalties for large-scale Medicaid fraud. Attorney General Ellison said the bill would add 18 specialized staff to the unit, moving it from 32 to 50 positions, and argued the federal-state matching structure makes the Attorney General’s office the proper home for the funding because the unit is dedicated to Medicaid fraud work. Nick Wonka, director of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, explained the bill’s provisions affecting committee jurisdiction: expanded subpoena authority to obtain financial account contents in provider-fraud investigations, conforming legal representation language to preserve the unit’s authority, venue changes to allow charging in counties where parts of the offense occurred, and a restitution change to let courts order restitution for related conduct in the same scheme. He said the subpoena change would speed investigations and align the Attorney General’s authority with other agencies, and that the restitution change would help recover more fraudulently obtained Medicaid funds. No public testimony was offered. Members questioned why the funding should go to the Attorney General’s office rather than the BCA, whether the new records authority was federally required, how the venue language would work across state lines, and whether the added FTEs indicated the fraud problem was larger than expected. Ellison and Wonka responded that the federal grant requires the work to stay within the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, that the unit’s investigators are specialized and work with, but separate from, law enforcement, and that the venue provision applies only within Minnesota while out-of-state matters would be referred to the appropriate authorities. The amendment that had been posted was withdrawn and not offered.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 14 (1-27-26)

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, no ABRs, essentially included agency budget requests. They're additional budget requests.
  • <01:16:59.280> bill not the road plan, but the budget bill not the road plan, but the budget
  • essentially included agency budget essentially included agency budget requests.<01:17:34.400>
  • They're additional budget requests.
  • . amendments. amendments.
Summary: The House convened on the 14th legislative day after winter weather closures, established a quorum, approved the prior journal, and received notice that the Senate had passed Senate Bills 27, 30, 40, and 76 and requested concurrence. The chamber also suspended rules to allow co-sponsorship and vote modifications, and later recessed briefly for caucus and for meetings of the committee on committees and the rules committee. Two bills were taken up and passed on the floor. House Bill 306, relating to criminal trespass, was explained as a workplace-safety measure that would define disruptive or threatening behavior in workplaces and increase penalties for repeat offenses; it passed 83-7. House Bill 34, relating to death benefits, was described as expanding recognized cancers for fire service-related benefits; it passed 92-0. After passage of HB 34, a motion for a clincher was adopted without objection. During announcements, a member from Todd outlined the newly filed branch budget bills and said the executive budget would be a scaled-back, “bare-bones” operational budget focused on restraining spending growth and inviting more public review through budget subcommittees. The House also adopted a citation honoring Notre Dame Academy and Catholic Schools Week, heard an announcement about hearing screenings by the Kentucky Academy of Audiology, and received a lengthy floor speech marking International Holocaust Remembrance Day before adopting House Resolution 30 without objection. At the end of the session, new bills and resolutions were introduced, including measures on lactation consultation, Medicaid waivers, a child tax credit, postsecondary employment, long-term care, court security officers, prisoner monitoring devices, administrative regulations, the state budget, transportation, legislative and judicial appropriations, stalking, and memorial overpasses. The committee on committees referred several bills to standing committees, the rules committee posted House Bills 56, 214, 281, and 366 for the next day, a floor amendment to House Bill 320 was reported, and the House adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 28, 2026.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Apr 22nd, 2025

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • That was not in the governor's budget. You'll see that number is zero in our budget.
  • So entertain a motion on the amendment. I make a motion to adopt the amendment.
  • I have an amendment prepared.
  • I think there is one technical amendment. Can you offer that, Representative? amendment.
  • So we have an amendment to the bill as amended. I entertain a motion.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 14th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • The budget system. For once we budget, we're required to budget by individual position.
  • The budget system for once we budget, we're required to budget by individual position.
  • And so For once, we budget, we're required to budget by individual position.
  • Correct, over the base budget. Over the base budget. So that's what you're...
  • Correct, over the base budget. Over the base budget.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met with all members present and took up several bills, focusing most of the discussion on SB 1577 and SB 1619, along with a detailed review of the HHS budget bill draft. On SB 1577, Senator Magrum explained that the bill was being revised to focus on wastewater rather than raw water, possibly shifting the Washburn project to the Department of Water Resources so it could access matching funds, and potentially converting the bill into a line of credit if federal money is restored later. Members discussed whether to keep an emergency clause or instead use a date-based approach, and agreed the bill would likely be handled through the full committee and possibly reconsidered later. On SB 1619, Senator Davison said amendments were still being worked on, including changes requested by the Bank of North Dakota, and the committee planned to hold it for possible amendment before full committee consideration. The bulk of the meeting was a section-by-section review of the HHS appropriations bill draft. Members discussed one-time funding items such as technology projects, child care programs, housing programs, behavioral health facility grants, infant and toddler care provider support, juvenile justice diversion, medical housing, and other public health and human services projects. Several adjustments were noted, including reductions or changes to IMD-related funding, incarcerated-person treatment funding, the child welfare technology project, and the provider rate increase. The committee also discussed the FTE block grant structure at length, with staff explaining that the apparent increase in positions reflected budgeting mechanics, zero-dollar “phantom” positions, and positions approved previously but not counted in the FTE total. Members raised concerns about transparency and whether the bill should list FTE numbers, but staff said the block grant was intended to give the department flexibility while quarterly reporting would provide oversight. Other topics included Medicaid expansion funding and provider reimbursement rules, the move toward certifying human service centers as certified community behavioral health clinics, a moratorium on new ICF beds, and studies or reports on Medicaid, obesity, disability services, truancy, and behavioral health facility grants. The committee also discussed removing or revising broad intent language in Section 31 so the department would report findings rather than implement changes without further legislative action. No final votes were taken in the transcript; instead, members agreed to make a few technical adjustments, continue reviewing the bill, and likely revisit it the next day before moving it to conference committee.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 11th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it's all related to human services, so I should be looking for an amendment in here? Okay.
  • I think, well, Senator Mathern, you offered an amendment for the study of basic care, which is in 2271
  • It was amended in the House.
  • The amendment I just worked on was on the study. Okay. Yeah. Was that 1577? 2271.
  • So we're just taking it out of the base budget, and we're making it a one-time item.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met to finalize changes to the human services budget bill and related amendments. Members discussed several items, including a proposed $5 million appropriation for the Altru Hospital project to address inflationary costs, with the rest of the funding question left for conference committee. They also agreed to keep the 10-year operating requirement language for the project and remove a matching-funds provision that was no longer needed. The committee spent considerable time on the OASIS child welfare IT system. Donna Auckland explained that the project is still in the RFP stage, with vendor selection and contract negotiation likely taking months, and that the system will require 50-50 federal matching authority. Based on that testimony, the committee agreed to reduce the general fund amount from $14 million to $6 million and use a line of credit for the remaining authority, while preserving the federal match authority so the contract can be signed and the project can proceed. Members also approved a technical fix to add governor’s designee language for the Children’s Cabinet, which had been missed in another bill already on the governor’s desk. Keith reviewed updated long sheets showing additional budget adjustments, including provider inflation changes, a $50,000 Family Voices grant, reductions to CARES Act COVID funds, and moving the $5-per-day basic care rate increase from ongoing to one-time funding. No formal votes were recorded in the transcript, and the committee adjourned with plans to reconvene Monday if the final bill version was ready.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have to discuss it, but I have to get the amendment. I just sent off my other amendment.
  • And the department also has these amendments. The amendments are considered Sections 7, 8, and 9.
  • And the department also has these amendments. The amendments are considered Sections 7, 8, and 9.
  • It's not even in their budget.
  • I'd like it to be in the base budget or not the base budget, come out of the base budget for the coming
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee first discussed a wastewater infrastructure bill, centered on whether state support should be provided as a grant or through the existing Clean Water State Revolving Fund as a low-interest loan program. Department of Environmental Quality official David Brushwine explained that the SRF already finances wastewater projects, can leverage federal funds with state bond proceeds, and could accommodate the Washburn, Lincoln, and Peasant projects if they are ready to proceed. Members noted that losing federal grant support would make projects harder for local residents to afford because costs would be recovered through utility rates or special assessments, but the projects would still be eligible for loans. Senator Magrum indicated he would likely concur with the budget after this discussion, and the bill was set aside for later consideration. The committee then turned to a proposed amendment for a four-plex housing project for people with disabilities or other special needs. Senator Mathern described Sections 7 and 8 as creating a design consultation appropriation and a revolving loan fund modeled on existing hospital and nursing home loan programs, while Section 9 would transfer $3.3 million from the state infrastructure fund. Members debated ownership, rent subsidies, repayment terms, and whether the state should finance the project directly or leave it to a private developer with Department of Human Services oversight. Concerns were raised that the state should not own the housing and that the proposal needed more work to be workable, but the committee ultimately reached consensus to adopt Sections 7 and 8 and leave out Section 9 for further conference committee discussion. The committee also reviewed provider inflation and long-term care rate issues, with members discussing whether to support a 2% and 1.5% inflation adjustment and how to handle the $5-per-day basic care rate. Staff explained that the $5 payment was already in the base budget, but members debated whether it should remain ongoing or be treated as one-time funding and paired with a study of rate rebasing. The committee agreed to have draft language prepared to remove the $5 from the base budget and add study language, then moved the bill forward for drafting.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • It would go to budget section, so I believe you're all part of budget section, and you would hear about
  • some sort of big budget reduction going forward.
  • FMAP there, and include that for budget purposes.
  • Chairman, Senator Matherner, I saw your amendment.
  • Keith did get the amendment to us as we were talking.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee met to review revised long sheets and section-by-section language for a human services/health budget bill, with much of the discussion focused on how to present block grant funding and full-time equivalent (FTE) positions for behavioral health clinics and CCBHCs. Members debated whether to keep FTE counts in the budget at all, ultimately leaning toward removing or zeroing out the FTE references while keeping the dollar authority, and reducing the salaries-and-wages block grant by about $4.75 million. They also discussed public health federal authority, agreeing to remove about $60 million in unused federal spending authority tied to COVID-era funds, and clarified that if federal money later becomes available it could be requested through the Emergency Commission. A major topic was the provider inflation increase. The House version had 2% and 2%, while members debated alternatives and appeared to settle, at least for further work, on 2% in the first year and 1.5% in the second year, with staff asked to recalculate the fiscal impact. The committee also reviewed FMAP changes, noting a revised 2027 FMAP estimate and its effect on general fund and other funds, and discussed whether to adjust public health and other line items accordingly. Several members emphasized that many of these numbers are still tentative and will be refined before final action. The committee also touched on several policy items and capital-related provisions, including behavioral health services, Medicaid expansion, the moratorium on new ICF beds, and a proposed amendment for a medical homes/fourplex-related item that would show a $400,000 legislative investment with repayment from a developer. There was extended discussion of the All True hospital/facility proposal, with some members favoring leaving it in with a smaller initial commitment and others preferring to remove it and revisit later in conference committee. The meeting ended with staff asked to continue updating the bill language and members instructed to review remaining sections before the next meeting; no final votes were taken in the portion provided.