Video & Transcript Research : 'Legacy Amendment'

Page 20 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • back as 211, we believe any sort of change This system be required to be done to a constitutional amendment
  • Again, we think it works and the move here would be, in our opinion, a constitutional amendment.
  • Senate Bill 311 will amend section 22.002A of the Texas Government Code, and it will allow the Texas
  • Over time, the statute's been amended to to expressly add some courts and take other courts out.
  • The 1995 amendments were to add statutory county courts and statutory... probate court judges, and that's
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 12th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Requests to authorize or amend a production area may trigger a separate administrative hearing.
  • addresses this by, addresses this issue by eliminating the need for an additional hearing for each new or amended
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're very ugly. amended. Any reservations? Any no votes? amended. Any reservations?
  • amended. Any reservations? Any no votes? amended. Any reservations? Any no votes?
  • amended. Any reservations? Any no votes? amended. Any reservations? Any no votes?
  • <02:07:57.760> Any pass un amended. Any reservations? Any pass un amended.
  • pass with amendments. Any reservations? pass with amendments. Any reservations?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The amendment is adopted. Floor amendment number two by Blanco.
  • Members, there is an amendment. The secretary will read the amendment, floor amendment number...
  • I follow an amendment. The secretary will read the amendment. Floor amendment number one by Hughes.
  • Amendments, excuse me. Amendment. Amendment. Or amendment number one by Bettencourt.
  • Hearing none, the amendment is adopted. The following amendment... I read the amendment.
Bills: SB8, SB4, SB43, SB1, SB2, SB13, SB6, SB10, SB16, SB14, SB3, SB8, SB4, SB43, SB1, SB2, SB13, SB6, SB10, SB16, SB14, SB3
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government Apr 14th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The act takes effect on January 1, 2026, but only if a constitutional amendment is created to provide
  • The act takes effect on January 1, 2026, but only if a constitutional amendment is created to provide
  • , as long as those amendments still preserve those core principles that I just laid out.
  • I'm on the bill, but we can very easily... ...get to for the bill with a couple of amendments on behalf
  • Now, I heard the amended version, but there's always going to be additional costs beyond the matching
Summary: The committee heard several local government and property tax bills, with most testimony focused on appraisal disputes, tax administration, and development rules. Senate Bill 1052 by Senator Hinojosa would address coastal county appraisal litigation by requiring property owners in certain large-value disputes to report an uncontested taxable value while appeals are pending, so taxing units can base truth-in-taxation calculations on more realistic revenue. Nueces County, Del Mar College, and Corpus Christi ISD testified in support, describing major budget shortfalls caused by refinery valuation disputes; the committee substitute narrowed and clarified the bill’s scope. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1052 was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1531, which would require local tax collectors to accept common electronic property tax payments such as credit cards, debit cards, and e-checks. Witnesses supported modernizing payment options and the committee substitute removed ACH/electronic funds transfer language to avoid bank-account disclosure concerns. Public testimony closed and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 325, by Senator Perry, would restore platting and groundwater-certification requirements that were unintentionally weakened by prior legislation; supporters from county government, water groups, and builders’ representatives debated whether the real issue was groundwater protection or road standards for private roads. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony and no vote. The committee then took up Senate Bill 994 and SJR 46, which would exempt certain livestock feed inventory from property tax and provide the constitutional amendment needed for that change. Feed store and Farm Bureau witnesses supported the measure as relief for seasonal inventory taxes, and the bills were left pending. Senator Paxton presented SB 467 and SJR 84 to create a temporary property tax exemption for homes completely destroyed by fire, with refunds or corrected bills based on the date of loss; both were left pending. SB 1237 would clarify charitable property tax exemptions for senior housing and retirement communities, with testimony from Catholic and Baptist retirement organizations and a resident describing rising costs and exemption revocations; it was also left pending. The committee later voted 6-0 to report SB 2073, a pending bill on appraisal district authority to purchase or finance real property, and recommended it for the local and uncontested calendar. Finally, the committee heard SB 2172, SB 2173, and SB 2063, all related to property tax administration. SB 2172 would limit when appraisal districts can require homeowners to reapply for homestead exemptions, requiring a specific reason and written notice; SB 2173 would protect new homeowners from surprise tax liabilities caused by prior owners’ erroneous homestead exemptions, with testimony describing large back-assessment bills; both were left pending. SB 2063 would bar appraisal districts from using market-value evidence in unequal appraisal protests, and testimony sharply divided between taxpayer advocates, who said market data improperly overwhelms equity claims, and appraisal district representatives, who argued market value is inherently tied to equal-and-uniform taxation and cited a recent Texas Supreme Court decision; the bill was left pending after testimony.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Feb 12th, 2026 at 04:58 pm

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Speaker, we actually had an amendment, a friendly amendment. Oh, okay. But I guess not. All right.
  • I would like to now move House Floor Amendment Number 1 to House Bill 96 as already amended.
  • So therefore, it is a friendly amendment. Okay, is there a debate on the amendment?
  • Is there opposition to adopting the amendment? Seeing none, you've got an amended bill.
  • to debate, amendment, or substitution.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Part 2 Feb 12th, 2026 at 12:58 pm

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, would you like to move the amendment first? I move the amendment.
  • Okay, so you're moving House floor amendment number one to House Bill 291, as amended.
  • House floor amendment number one to House Bill 291 as amended has been tabled.
  • House floor amendment number one to House Bill 291 as amended has been tabled.
  • Legacy Fund and the Conservation Legacy Fund and the Conservation Legacy Permanent Fund.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The clerk will read the amendment to the amendment. Clerk: Amendment by Anchía.
  • The amendment to the amendment is adopted.
  • The following amendment, the clerk will read the amendment. Clerk: Amendment by Hinojosa.
  • The following amendment, the clerk will read. Clerk: The amendment. Amendment by Bernal.
  • The following amendment, the clerk will read the amendment. Amendment by Hinojosa.
Bills: HB8, HB12, SB 3, HJR1, SB 11, SB 16, SB 14
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce May 15th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill would amend Section 4... Other peace officers with similar responsibilities.
  • Our constitutional amendment won't protect us from that. Yes, it will.
  • Our constitutional amendment won't protect us from that. Yes, it will.
  • When the framers added the Second Amendment to the U.S.
  • And second, the amended bill... ...or investor-owned utilities as they filed their plans.
Summary: The committee first handled pending business, including reconsidering SB 715 and then voting out several measures. The committee substitute for SB 1978 was reported favorably, and HB 431, HB 1522, HB 1922, HB 3228, HB 3229, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 4219, HB 4238, HB 434, HB 1584, and HB 4739 were all reported favorably, many with objections sent to the local and uncontested calendar. HB 1522 and HB 4238 were adopted as committee substitutes before passage. The committee then moved into public testimony on HB 2963, a right-to-repair bill for consumer electronics. Supporters argued it would reduce waste, lower costs, and help independent repair shops by requiring manufacturers to provide parts, tools, and information on fair terms, while opponents said the bill was too broad and the automotive MOU exemption was problematic. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard HB 2467, which would align State Fire Marshal Office investigators’ pay with other commissioned peace officers at TDI; testimony was strongly supportive, emphasizing the office’s arson-investigation role, and the bill was left pending. HB 252, a bill allowing certain state agencies flexibility to pay Schedule A employees twice monthly, was laid out and left pending after limited testimony. HB 2468, dealing with public improvement district notice in real estate transactions, would let buyers terminate within seven days if required PID notice was not provided before contract execution; it drew no public testimony and was left pending. HB 4386, an annuity exchange and surrender process bill, was presented as a consumer-protection measure with deadlines and penalties for insurer delays; it received support from industry witnesses and was left pending. The committee then heard HB 4751, creating the Texas Quantum Initiative within the Governor’s Office to coordinate quantum research, workforce, industry partnerships, and possible future grant funding. Witnesses from universities and industry supported the bill, while several senators questioned whether a new state structure was necessary; the bill was left pending. HJR 175 proposed a constitutional amendment protecting Texans’ right to use mutually agreed forms of exchange, including cash, bullion, digital currency, or private script, and was discussed at length in the context of central bank digital currency and barter; it was left pending after testimony. HB 2221, updating insurance anti-rebating laws to allow wellness and value-added services, drew supportive testimony from the insurance industry and discussion about incentives versus monitoring; it was also left pending. Finally, the committee heard a series of utility wildfire and infrastructure bills: HB 106, requiring oil and gas operators to maintain certain electrical infrastructure near well sites; HB 144, requiring electric utilities to submit pole inspection and management plans to the PUC; and HB 145, requiring wildfire mitigation plans and allowing self-insurance under certain conditions. Utility, insurance, and cooperative witnesses generally supported the wildfire-related bills while asking for clarifications and less burdensome reporting, and the bills were left pending.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Business and Commerce May 15th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Kolkhorst moves that Senate Bill 1978 do not pass, but that the committee substitute, as amended
  • This bill would amend Section 4... ...other peace officers with similar responsibilities.
  • Our constitutional amendment won't protect us from that. Yes, it will.
  • When the framers added the Second Amendment to the U.S.
  • And then a couple of amendments got added in the House that you sort of touched on as well.
Summary: The committee first handled pending business, including reconsidering a failed vote on SB 715 and then reporting several measures favorably. SB 1978 was reported from committee on a committee substitute, and a series of House bills — including HB 431, HB 1522, HB 1922, HB 3228, HB 3229, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 4219, HB 4238, HB 434, HB 1584, and HB 4739 — were moved out of committee, most to the local and uncontested calendar. The votes on these items were overwhelmingly or unanimously in favor, with committee substitutes adopted where applicable. The committee then heard HB 2963, a right-to-repair bill for consumer electronics. The author said the bill would require manufacturers to provide parts, tools, and documentation on fair and reasonable terms while preserving trade secrets and excluding certain categories such as medical devices, motor vehicles covered by an MOU, critical infrastructure, and commercial-only transactions. Supporters from the Texas Public Policy Foundation and Environment Texas argued it would strengthen property rights, help small businesses, and reduce e-waste. Opponents, including representatives of SafeLight Auto Glass and LKQ, said they supported right-to-repair in principle but objected to the bill’s automotive MOU exemption and broader scope, warning it could create uncertainty and leave some manufacturers and repair shops outside the framework. The bill was left pending after testimony. Members also heard HB 2467 on salary parity for State Fire Marshal investigators, HB 252 on allowing some state agencies to pay certain employees twice monthly, HB 2468 on public improvement district notice and a buyer’s right to terminate, HB 4386 on annuity contract exchanges and surrender timelines, HB 4751 creating a Texas Quantum Initiative and related fund, and HJR 175 proposing a constitutional amendment protecting Texans’ ability to use mutually agreed-upon mediums of exchange, including cash, bullion, and digital currency. Testimony on HB 4751 was largely supportive but included questions about whether the state needs a new coordinating structure and funding mechanism for quantum research and commercialization. HJR 175 drew discussion about barter, taxes, and concerns over central bank digital currency. Each of these items was left pending after hearing testimony. The committee also heard HB 2221, which would update insurance anti-rebating laws to allow more wellness and value-added services in life and health insurance, with supporters saying it would encourage healthier behavior without requiring data monitoring. Finally, the committee took up a package of utility and wildfire-related bills from Chairman King’s portfolio: HB 106, requiring oil and gas operators to maintain certain overhead electrical lines; HB 144, requiring utilities to submit pole inspection and management plans to the PUC; and HB 145, requiring wildfire mitigation plans and allowing utilities to self-insure under certain conditions. Utility, co-op, and insurance representatives generally supported the safety and resiliency goals of HB 144, while asking for clarifications and less frequent reporting; HB 145 was introduced as a broader wildfire-risk and liability measure. These bills were also left pending after testimony.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 22nd, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our pilots are proud of this legacy, steering through storms and tight spots to keep our ports safe and
  • I'm happy to have an amendment to say they have to do that on a geographic level.
  • This is just the enabling amendment to be able to authorize House Bill 3332, which is a Regional Mobility
  • confidentiality of personal information collected by local governments. and airport governing boards by amending
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The expression of hatred is one of our First Amendment rights, and the fact that this definition isn't
  • Senate Bill 199 would be a friendly amendment to an otherwise very good bill. Thank you. Thank you.
  • This is dangerous, and I feel like it is the footstep of losing our First Amendment rights.
  • On May 4th, 2024, I took an exam in criminal procedure, focused on the Fourth Amendment, and I was indeed
  • So we want to add to that menu, but what this amendment does is it allows us to better determine those
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • the Texas Civil Rights Project, and I'm here in opposition to the bill today. violates the First Amendment
  • As such, the bill is plainly overbroad and plainly unconstitutional. under the First Amendment, and I
  • There are people here who can tell you about how this law violates our First Amendment rights. and how
  • The very views the First Amendment and the state of Texas espouses to protect.
  • Chairman and members, this bill is building on something, a legacy that all of us have been a part of