Transcript Highlights:

• Persons disrupting legislative proceedings are subject to removal, arrest, or other appropriate legal
• For legislative business, Assemblymember Arambula.
• That power cannot be legislated away.
• Young Legislators of the Year from the 73rd Assembly District.
• Welcome to the legislators of tomorrow. We're so proud of you. I need to recognize Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm a senior analyst with the Legislative Education Study Committee.
• Approximately 1,328 legislative items were introduced, 195 items passed.
• The Legislative Council, um, the, the task force could also request that the Legislative council, um,
• And as legislators, we need to know from you what's not working and, and what legislation and what it
• requests with Legislative council Service.

Committee: House Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force

Transcript Highlights:

• branch issues about the legislative branch's organization.
• And so the people's legislative branch should not be a partisan issue.
• The people's legislative branch should not be a partisan issue.
• The fact that the executive branch or the judicial branch can't stop the legislative branch from doing
• </c><00:03:06.360><c> branch</c> the uh the people's legislative branch the uh the people's legislative

Transcript Highlights:

• Study Commission on Child Legislative Study Commission on Child Sexual<00:17:13.039><c> Abuse</c><00
• With that, I’ll call for the vote. legislation. The last one was 2026. This legislation.
• as the legislative committee as the substitute's<01:04:42.559><c> doing.
• </c> direction of the legislative committee. direction of the legislative committee. Correct.
• </c> this in this legislation. this in this legislation.

Transcript Highlights:

• I lift up each legislator here today to you. I lift up each legislator here today to you.
• appropriate to ask a legislative employee to opine on a pending piece of legislation.
• Public policy is not just about legislation; it’s about people. As I reflect, About legislation.
• It preserves legislative oversight.
• And members, we often look back on legislation and look for the legislative intent of the bill.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, a moment of silence for former Judge John Carlin, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a recognition of FSU Police Officer Cody Popple for his actions during the April campus shooting. The Speaker also outlined the final week of session, noting the House would focus on Senate bills and returning messages, and that the 2026-27 budget would not be completed by the end of the week. The chamber then adopted the special order calendar for the day. The House passed several technical and open-government bills, mostly on strong bipartisan votes. These included SB 100, SB 104, and SB 102 on the Florida Statutes and reviser changes; SB 7006, SB 7014, SB 7002, SB 7012, SB 7024, SB 7016, SB 7026, SB 7008, SB 7000, and SB 7004, which extended or preserved various public records or meeting exemptions involving the Public Service Commission, social media investigations, military affairs, highway safety investigations, cybersecurity, small business loan records, trade secrets, emergency shelter locations, and conviction integrity units. Members asked questions on several of these bills, especially about the scope and purpose of the exemptions, but the bills generally advanced with little opposition. The chamber also took up more substantive measures. SB 7040 recreated the emergency preparedness and response trust fund and drew extended debate over whether the fund had been misused for the Everglades detention facility; an Escamani amendment to let the fund expire failed, while a Griffiths amendment adding limits and oversight was adopted, and the bill ultimately passed 82-25. CS/CS/SB 302 on coastal resiliency passed unanimously after supporters highlighted nature-based shoreline protection and a Biscayne Bay provision. CS/CS/SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits passed after a House amendment aligned it with the House version. CS/SB 474 on military affairs passed unanimously after an amendment allowing local governments to extend Guard leave. SB 488 on the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles was debated extensively over vehicle registration requirements, license plate frames, and I-94 documentation, with amendments including one for disabled veterans and another on dealer allocation; the transcript cuts off before final disposition of that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:30:45.600><c> come</c> think, to to have good legislation come think, to to have good legislation
• </c> taking a position on this uh legislation taking a position on this uh legislation because<00:45:
• So this bill protects legislation.
• </c> in strong support of this legislation. in strong support of this legislation.
• Again, as you've heard, legislation.

Bills: HB2227 , HB1775 , HB1560 , HB1642 , HB1647 , HB2003 , HB1640 , HB2198

Committee: House Consumer Protection & Commerce

Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 5, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills, beginning with HB 227 relating to eviction records. Supporters, including the Public First Law Center and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, argued the bill would help people who prevail in eviction cases avoid long-term housing harm from online court records, while the Public First Law Center said keeping records off eCourt Kokua would not violate the First Amendment because the records would still be available in person. Members discussed access-to-justice concerns, and a witness said legal aid attorneys could still access the records through the attorney-only Jeff’s system and the court’s access-to-justice room. The chair also asked about precedent, and a witness cited a Hawaii Supreme Court case as supporting removal from the online database rather than sealing records entirely. The committee then took up HP 1775 relating to foreclosures, but the transcript only shows in-person opposition comments from the Hawaii State Bar Association Collection Law Section, the Hawaii Credit Union League, and the Hawaii Bankers Association. The credit union and banking groups said they had concerns about broader negative impacts on mortgage lending and other requirements, but no detailed discussion or action was captured before the committee moved on. The next measure, HB 1560 relating to consumer protection, drew support from the Office of Consumer Protection and cryptocurrency companies including Coinflip and America Digital, which said they already use wallet-pinning and other safeguards to prevent fraud. AARP Hawaii did not take a formal position but said the bill addressed a real problem, noting that Hawaii residents, especially in Kona, had lost more than $920,000 in 2024 to cryptocurrency ATM scams and arguing that stronger oversight was needed. The committee also heard HB 1642, which would ban cryptocurrency kiosks. The Office of Consumer Protection supported the ban as the best way to protect consumers from fraud, while Coinflip, Bitcoin Depot, and America Digital opposed it, arguing kiosks provide cash-based access to crypto, especially for unbanked or underbanked consumers, and that targeted regulation would be better than an outright ban. AARP Hawaii took no formal position but strongly emphasized the harm caused by scams, saying victims are often frightened into acting quickly and that kiosk transactions currently lack enough friction or intervention. Finally, HB 1647, also on consumer protection, would impose liability on host businesses that provide space for crypto kiosks. The Office of Consumer Protection warned small businesses might not understand the liability, while Coinflip, Bitcoin Depot, and America Digital opposed the bill, saying it would unfairly shift enforcement duties to host stores and could discourage businesses from hosting kiosks, effectively creating a de facto ban. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• She is our first openly transgender legislator in the state of Hawaii.
• </c> rep grandinetti is a former legislative rep grandinetti is a former legislative staffer<02:10:28.920
• So in closing, as we begin the 33rd legislative session, we open a time of possibility.
• legislation.
• legislation.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> committee and testimony this legislation committee and testimony this legislation is<00:28:57.679
• They are fully in favor of these pieces of legislation.
• </c> importantly to this piece of legislation importantly to this piece of legislation uh<00:33:09.559
• I think the other piece of this is that we've crafted this legislation.
• When we crafted this legislation, we did craft it using model legislation, and I've worked with OS in

Committee: Senate Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:58:09.679><c> thank</c> irresponsible legislation thank irresponsible legislation thank you<01
• State your motion. resolve that is inexpedient to legislate resolve that is inexpedient to legislate
• </c> report of inexpedient to legislative report of inexpedient to legislative House<04:05:06.279><c>
• </c> the committee to pass this legislation the committee to pass this legislation and<05:15:09.000><
• </c> that is inexpedient to legislate that is inexpedient to legislate representative<05:17:08.320><c

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> at the very least this legislation at the very least this legislation if<00:34:11.760><c> not</c
• </c> think that this kind of legislation think that this kind of legislation really<00:44:55.200><c>
• </c> they are exercising legislative power. they are exercising legislative power.
• It reinforces legislative process.
• </c> ask that you uh support the legislation. ask that you uh support the legislation.

Committee: House Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> bill, it's not just for the legislators bill, it's not just for the legislators that<00:08:11.759
• So I do support this legislation.
• </c> I do support this legislation. I do support this legislation.
• </c> and it's evil what's happened to legisl and it's evil what's happened to legisl legislators<01:40
• </c> legislators in this room. legislators in this room.

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you think that this piece of legislation would minimize that risk?
• So do you think that this legislation would actually... ...do you think that this legislation would actually
• I'm here to testify in support of this legislation.
• I think it's crucial that this be addressed legislatively.
• This legislation would make that model the statewide standard.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities

Summary: The Joint Committee on Children, Families, and Persons with Disabilities held a hybrid hearing on a series of child welfare bills focused on DCF, foster care, mandated reporting, educational records, and family support. Chair Kennedy and Chair Livingstone opened with accessibility and testimony rules, then heard testimony on bills including S.127 on expanding mandated reporters, S.107/H.235 on a Foster Children’s Bill of Rights, S.106/H.228 on transferring foster care review from DCF to the Office of the Child Advocate, H.258/S.125 on an electronic backpack for foster children’s educational records, H.205 on kinship foster care background checks, H.246/H.266 on minimizing trauma in care and protection cases, and S.159 on support for families after sudden unexpected infant death. Supporters of the mandated reporter bill, led by Sen. Feeney and Foxborough advocates, described a local model that trains all adults who work with children and argued the state should scale that approach statewide to improve recognition and reporting of abuse. Testimony on the foster care bills emphasized the need for clearer rights, better notice to children and attorneys, stronger remedies, and independent oversight. Advocates, youth with lived experience, and legal organizations described placement instability, delayed notifications, abuse in care, poor educational continuity, and the need for rights around safety, family contact, culture, language, and access to records. Several witnesses urged that the Foster Children’s Bill of Rights include enforceable court remedies, not just reporting requirements. On the oversight bill, supporters argued DCF should not review its own foster care system and pointed to poor outcomes, high placement instability, and recent investigative reporting as evidence for moving review responsibilities to the Office of the Child Advocate. On the electronic backpack bill, testimony focused on the need for real-time data sharing and a centralized system so schools can receive foster students’ records quickly and support continuity. On the trauma-minimization bill, Rep. Miskin framed the proposal as a set of practical changes to reduce harm during removals and court involvement. On the SUID bill, Sen. Lovely said families should be given information about available grief and support resources after an infant death. No votes were taken during the hearing; the committee primarily received testimony and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> advance that legislatively. advance that legislatively.
• So again, I guess my question comes around this idea of the legislative body.
• So again, I guess my question comes around this idea of the legislative body.
• </c><00:42:04.240><c> body</c> around this idea of the legislative body around this idea of the legislative
• </c><00:42:22.400><c> body</c> taxpayers, then the legislative body taxpayers, then the legislative body

Committee: Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• There's been multiple legislators that have just—so that's...
• There's been multiple legislators that have just, so that's, “To me, there’s been multiple legislators
• Do we look at that on every legislative session? or how?
• We'll take care of that legislating.
• We'll take care of that legislatively.

Summary: The Higher Education Funding Committee met to discuss possible changes to North Dakota’s higher education funding formula, with a particular focus on separating the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences MD program from the general formula. Dr. Jenkins outlined several options for the MD program, including a fixed-funding model, a hybrid model, or keeping it in the formula, and emphasized the need to preserve strong support for medical education while making future funding clearer. He also discussed efforts to increase the share of North Dakota students in the MD program through ND85, expanded recruiting, early acceptance pathways, MCAT prep, a four-plus-one program, and the Primary Care Accelerated Track, along with future cost pressures such as AI licensing and residency growth. The committee then reviewed a simplified funding model from the University System Office that would base funding more heavily on student FTE, credentials awarded, and a few incentive factors such as small institution and research adjustments. Members questioned the use of placeholder numbers, the lack of a clear methodology for the small institution and research factors, and whether the model would adequately account for differences among institutions, high-cost programs, and graduate education. Several members raised concerns that arbitrary factors would be hard to defend politically and could distort funding or create competition between schools, while others said the exercise was useful as a starting point for discussion. Alex presented a second alternative that kept the current SIP-code structure but increased CTE weighting, added a progressive economic size factor, and separated out the MD program. His model also added an on-campus face-to-face headcount component and a credentials component, with the intent of rewarding in-person enrollment and completions. Members questioned the use of headcount instead of FTE, how hybrid, online, dual-credit, and off-campus students would be treated, and why face-to-face enrollment was weighted more heavily than completion. No formal votes or final actions were taken; the committee instead continued discussion and asked members to provide direction on which elements, if any, should be developed further.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm a Senior Policy Analyst with the Legislative Education Study Committee.
• Chair Soles, Chair Small, members of the Legislative Education Study Committee, the Legislative Finance
• The next slide highlights Legislative actions for this next session in 2026.
• Really want to highlight for you some key pieces of legislation.
• Our legislative session, I met in multiple discussions and meetings.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> um mostly in the last um legislative um mostly in the last um legislative session<00:12:51.519><
• This legislation, as through this work.
• </c><00:25:19.679><c> We</c> and for considering this legislation.
• We and for considering this legislation.
• </c> of the different bills and legislation of the different bills and legislation that<00:36:32.480>

Summary: The committee met on October 23, 2025, approved the September 25 minutes, and heard several informational presentations on occupational licensing and workforce access. The first major topic was the dietitian licensure compact, presented by Rep. Vanessa Gracel, Whitney Duddy, and Caitlyn Bison. They said the compact would be revenue-neutral, improve licensure portability, support military families, expand telehealth and rural access, and preserve state regulatory authority. Testimony noted that 15 states had joined the compact, including Ohio and Tennessee, and that Kentucky would have a seat on the compact commission if it enacted the measure. Members asked about bordering states and possible telehealth competition concerns; witnesses said they had not seen evidence of harmful effects in other compacts and described the compact as expanding access rather than displacing local providers. The committee then heard testimony on music therapy licensure, with Chris Millet, Laura Elliot Buckner, and Dr. Kimberly Cinemore speaking in support of Senate Bill 42. They described music therapy as a clinical, board-certified profession requiring formal education, supervised training, and national certification, and argued that state licensure would protect the public, clarify scope of practice, and help retain Kentucky-trained professionals. Witnesses said the bill would not require new state funding, could be administered through a self-sustaining licensing structure, and would not prevent others from using music in their work. In response to questions, they said licensure could help open doors to insurance, waiver, and HSA reimbursement, but would not guarantee coverage. Finally, the committee heard testimony on expanding physician access through a provisional licensure pathway for internationally trained physicians. Adam Meyer of the Cicero Institute said Kentucky faces a severe physician shortage, especially in rural areas, and argued that qualified international physicians should not have to repeat residency if they meet strict criteria, including an employment offer, prior training and experience, good standing, U.S. exam passage, and a three-year provisional period before full licensure. Rapender Carr of Baptist Health supported the concept, saying it could help fill hard-to-recruit positions across the state and improve access in rural markets. No votes were taken on these policy topics during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Therefore, unconstitutional legislation. Therefore, unconstitutional legislation.
• I bringing this legislation forward. I bringing this legislation forward.
• HB202 is offered to amend legislation. HB202 is offered to amend legislation.
• comprehensive legislative measures and comprehensive legislative measures and comprehensive legislative
• . legislation. legislation.

Bills: HB265 , HB146 , SB254 , HB202 , HB3 , HB42 , SB18

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Keywords: resisting arrest, penalties, criminal justice, law enforcement, public safety, youthful offender, capital murder, victims' rights, SB254, Alabama, statute of limitations, civil procedure, civil action, sex offense, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, survivor rights, tolling, disability, minor plaintiff

Transcript Highlights:

• or</c> correcting clarifying legislation or correcting clarifying legislation or correcting<00:03:46.080
• ><c> improving</c><00:03:46.799><c> legislation</c><00:03:47.280><c> would</c> correcting improving legislation
• </c><00:22:29.840><c> They</c> take a position on legislation. They take a position on legislation.
• All the other members are voting members. of legislators that are appointed to of legislators that are
• Uh a related piece of legislation.

Committee: Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:

• As the other legislators log in, we'll make sure to recognize them.
• And that concerns all of us here as legislators.
• Beal, and my own legislators, Rep.
• Worrell and my own legislators, Rep.
• This legislation addresses three of these main barriers.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Financial Services

Summary: The committee held a public hearing with testimony on several health care bills, with most of the discussion focused on primary care access, community health center reimbursement, midwifery and birth centers, telehealth, hospital-at-home, direct primary care, and trans-inclusive health care access. Chair Feeney and Chair Murphy opened by noting the large number of signups and asking testifiers to keep remarks brief because of time constraints. Legislators and witnesses repeatedly emphasized that Massachusetts’ primary care system is under strain and that federal policy changes and reimbursement gaps are worsening financial pressure on providers. On community health centers, Representative Blay, Senator Lovely, Michael Curry, Bethany Keeley, Jag Deep Trevetti, Sean Cahill, and Christina Severin all supported H. 1096/S. 711, which would require commercial insurers to pay federally qualified health centers at least the MassHealth prospective payment system rate. They argued that commercial plans currently reimburse health centers below Medicaid rates, threatening sustainability, staffing, and access, especially as federal cuts and coverage losses could increase uncompensated care. Testifiers said the bill would stabilize health centers, protect primary care access, and not cost the state money. A second major topic was H. 1117/S. 784 on sustaining birth centers and the midwifery workforce. Senator Lovely, Senator Miranda, Emily Anesta, Rebecca Orden, Catherine Rushworth, Nishira Burrill, Joel Sutherland, Rachel Blessington, Joelle Ward, and others described the 2024 maternal health omnibus as an important first step, but said birth centers and midwives still face low reimbursement, workforce shortages, and financial instability. They urged reimbursement parity, a workforce development fund, and support for freestanding birth centers, citing improved outcomes, lower C-section rates, better patient experience, and racial equity in maternal health. Several speakers shared personal birth stories and said the bill would help preserve and expand birth options in communities like Roxbury, Worcester, and the North Shore. The committee also heard support for H. 1343 on direct primary care from Dr. Garofalo, Dr. Altman, Dr. Nair, Stephanie Cameron, Dr. Haley Moke-Blessed, and others, who said current insurance rules force patients to use a separate in-network primary care doctor for referrals and sometimes prevent physicians from dispensing medications. They argued the bill would reduce delays, administrative burden, and costs while improving continuity of care. In addition, Dr. Miklides and Sue Stempeck supported H. 1141 on hospital-at-home parity, saying the model has strong outcomes and should be reimbursed at the same rate as brick-and-mortar hospital care. Heather Myers and Katrina Cook testified on telehealth and digital health equity, urging broader coverage for asynchronous care, remote monitoring, interpreter services, and digital literacy supports. SEIU Local 509 supported H. 1188/S. 681 on trans-inclusive health care access, saying it would remove arbitrary insurance barriers to gender-affirming care. No votes or committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, years of cleanup legislation will be necessary to make AB-98 workable.
• While SB 415 makes beneficial changes to AB 98, ultimately there will be years of cleanup legislation
• Melissa Sparks-Crans with the League of California Cities here in support of the cleanup legislation
• Melissa Sparks-Crans with the League of California Cities here in support of the cleanup legislation
• But I appreciate all the work that you've also put into this legislation.

Committee: House Local Government

Summary: The committee hearing opened with housekeeping rules for public testimony and a note that SB 423 by Senator Gonzalez had been pulled from the agenda. The committee then took up SB 415 by Senator Reyes, described as cleanup legislation to clarify and implement last year’s AB 98 warehouse/logistics law. The bill would clarify that manufacturing facilities are not treated as logistics use facilities, give local governments more time and flexibility to update truck routes and circulation elements, provide safe-harbor language for good-faith efforts, exempt cities with no logistics facilities from certain update requirements, and allow some local truck-route ordinances outside warehouse concentration zones. One witness opposed the bill, arguing AB 98 and the cleanup measure would disproportionately burden rural areas, limit economic development, and reduce high-paying jobs tied to warehousing and logistics. Multiple witnesses supported SB 415, including representatives of the American Planning Association, county and city associations, rural counties, business property and logistics groups, grocers, shipping interests, and the Chamber of Commerce, who said the bill provided needed implementation flexibility and reflected extensive stakeholder negotiations. The Chamber also raised a process concern about a separate bill, SB 352, being amended in a way it viewed as outside the negotiated package. Committee members briefly commented on the process behind AB 98 and the need for further fixes, but generally acknowledged the work on the cleanup bill. Senator Reyes and Chair Carrillo said the measure reflected a year of negotiations and was intended to make AB 98 workable for local governments and industry while addressing community concerns. The committee then voted 10-0 to pass SB 415, and the hearing adjourned.