Transcript Highlights:

• So when they are voted on individually, as you would say maybe like individual bills that are being voted
• The LCCMAR came back in December to vote The LCCMAR came back in December to vote on<00:19:48.480
• You can vote how you want.
• Green votes yes.
• <00:36:51.599> Um<00:36:52.000> yes, vote yes. Um yes, vote yes.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Vice Chair, for the vote. Voting on HB 860, HD1, as is. Voting on HB 860, HD1, as is.
• <01:31:56.040> voting<01:31:56.320> on if not Vice chair for the vote voting on if
• vote uh voting on not Vice chair for the vote uh voting on House<01:32:21.280> Bill<01:32:21.520
• vote voting on House Vice chair for the vote voting on House Bill<01:43:18.320> 1291 Bill 1291
• vote voting on House Vice chair for the vote voting on House Bill<01:47:06.920> 1283<01:47:07.520

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard a series of transportation and public safety bills, beginning with HB 706, which would require skateboard users under age 16 to wear helmets. The Department of Transportation supported the measure, and the chair noted written support from AAA Hawaii, Kulani Medical Center for Women and Children, and several individuals. No opposition was mentioned, and the bill appeared to draw no questions. Members then heard HB 860, which would grant immunity to the state or county that repairs or maintains a street when ownership or jurisdiction is disputed. DOT and DLNR supported the bill, with county support from Maui and a Hawaii Island county representative, while the Hawaii Association for Justice opposed it. The committee also heard HB 1162, requiring applicants for a motorcycle instruction permit to complete an approved basic rider course, with DOT support and a recommended amendment to exempt motorcycles used for training; the Public Defender asked about the current process, and DOT explained the bill was intended to improve safety given motorcycle fatalities. HB 1259, allowing speed-limit reductions within 10 mph of the current limit without an engineering study, also drew DOT support and support from the AAHU Metropolitan Planning Organization and individuals. The committee next considered HB 1158, a governor’s package bill limiting civil liability for people who provide firefighting services with vessels at commercial harbors or roadsteads to gross negligence or wanton conduct. DOT Harbors said the bill was prompted by lessons from the Lahaina fires and was intended to encourage privately owned firefighting-equipped vessels to assist without hesitation; the Hawaii Harbor Users Group and an individual supported it. HB 54, which would make a third or subsequent excessive speeding offense a Class C felony and allow vehicle forfeiture, drew DOT support but strong opposition from the Public Defender, who argued the bill was overly harsh, would force jury trials, and could create sentencing problems; the Public Defender also said existing penalties were already significant. The committee then heard HB 1334, which would exempt donations of wild game meat, including axis deer, to charitable and nonprofit organizations from certain meat inspection and transportation laws; DLNR and multiple community and food-related groups supported it, and no opposition was noted. Finally, the committee took up HB 698 on animal cruelty, which would increase criminal penalties for various offenses. The Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing the cases are rare, enforcement is limited, and the proposed penalties—up to Class A felony treatment in some cases—were too severe; animal welfare advocates strongly supported the measure, saying cruelty cases are widespread, underreported, and under-enforced, and that stronger penalties are needed as a deterrent. No votes or final actions were taken on any of the bills in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Recorded vote in a hearing aid for you. >> A recorded vote is requested.
• Members will record their votes by electronic device. This is a five-minute vote.
• This is a 15-minute vote. On this vote, the yeas are 420, the nays are zero.
• We vote on this thing.
• We have 60 votes."

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, June 30, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:36:31.520> to<00:36:31.720> adopt<00:36:32.000> a votes to adopt a votes to
• in the house in both bodies get 68 votes in the house 34<00:42:31.079> votes<00:42:31.280>
• Georgia and North Carolina were voting Georgia and North Carolina were voting at<00:49:46.440>
• Constitution and the federal Voting Constitution and the federal Voting Rights<00:50:06.440>
• about was kind of the process of voting about was kind of the process of voting and<01:02:00.240

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
• Has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
• Has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
• President, has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
• President, has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?

Keywords: Senate streaming session for Tuesday, March 24, 2026, 960, senate, all

Summary: The Senate convened with 42 members present and a quorum, opened with an invocation by Pastor Jaylen Robinson, and recognized several guests and honorees. Early floor remarks included a welcome to students from Forest Oak Middle School, a young Senate shadow from Woodlawn High School, and guests from Charles H. Flowers High School. The chamber also noted a doctor of the day and announced that panoramic photos in the Senate lounge were available for order by March 27, with eye exams available in the State House. The main legislative business was Senate Bill 283, the President’s Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2026. The Senate Budget and Taxation Committee presented 291 amendments, described as funding priorities for jobs, infrastructure, and reliability while staying within debt affordability limits. The amendments covered school construction, natural resources, higher education, housing, Maryland Environmental Service, miscellaneous grants, local Senate bond initiatives, jails and detention centers, and pre-authorizations for fiscal 2028. Four amendments were separated for individual roll calls: 30, 35, 46, and 241, all of which were adopted. The remaining committee amendments were adopted without objection, and the favorable committee report as amended was then taken up. During debate on the capital budget amendments, one senator raised concerns about the bill and the difficulty of tracking the amendments on the electronic system, prompting discussion about technical issues and the availability of the documents on the website and in paper form. The chair said the committee had been working on the bill for months and urged the body to proceed. A question was raised about Amendment 264, which deauthorized a Willing Helper Society renovation project in Charles County; the chair explained the money had not been spent, was about to expire, and was repurposed to a Boys and Girls Club of Southern Maryland project to keep the funding in Charles County.

Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Chair votes aye. Voting on House Bill 302, House Draft 2.
• vice chair for the vote. Excuse me. vice chair for the vote. Excuse me.
• Chair votes aye. Thank you. Vice Chair also votes aye. Senator McKelvey, yes.
• Chair votes aye. Thank you. Vice Chair also votes aye. Senator McKelvie, yes.
• Chair votes aye. Thank you. Vice Chair also votes aye. Senator McKelvie, yes.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 302, which would expand access to medical cannabis by removing the in-person provider-patient relationship requirement and related restrictions. The Department of Health supported the bill, and multiple advocates and organizations testified in support, including the ACLU of Hawaii, Hawaii Alliance for Cannabis Reform, Marijuana Policy Project, and others. Supporters said the measure would improve access for patients, especially on outer islands, and some urged broader amendments allowing providers to certify cannabis for any medical condition and to speed registration and treat in-state and out-of-state patients equally. No opposition was heard, and the bill was left with no questions after testimony. The committee also heard HB 1052 HD1, which clarifies that the Public Utilities Commission may use universal service fund monies to provide free telecommunications access for individuals with print disabilities. Testimony was uniformly supportive from the DCCA Division of Consumer Advocacy, the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, the Department of Human Services, the Public Utilities Commission, and the National Federation of the Blind of Hawaii. Witnesses described the program as an important accessibility service that has been operating under prior appropriations and should continue under the universal service program. HB 1482, relating to controlled substances and hemp/synthetic cannabinoids, drew support from the Department of Law Enforcement, Department of Health, Honolulu Police Department, and others, with some comments from the Attorney General’s office. Supporters said the bill would clarify that delta-8 THC is a controlled substance and help enforcement against illegal hemp products and synthetic cannabinoids. Testimony and questioning focused on the need for better lab testing capacity, retail registry and age-gating, seizure authority, nuisance abatement, and possible use of special funds or appropriations to support enforcement. Members also discussed enforcement of illegal hemp businesses and whether additional funding or statutory changes would be needed. Finally, the committee took up HB 712, a 340B drug-discount measure affecting safety-net providers and contract pharmacies. Hospitals, health centers, and provider groups testified in support, saying the bill would protect access to discounted drugs and preserve funding for services such as chronic disease management, transportation, and specialty care. Pharmaceutical-industry representatives opposed the bill or sought amendments, arguing the 340B program has expanded beyond its original intent and lacks transparency, and they requested reporting or audit-like provisions to verify claims and revenues. Members questioned both sides about alleged abuse, the growth of contract pharmacies, and whether the bill should include transparency requirements before moving forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Opel votes yes. Representative Opel votes yes. Representative Spar votes yes.
• /c><01:37:13.360> the<01:37:13.480> vote to1 okay the vote to1 okay the vote being<01:37
• Representative Ford voted yes. Representative Murphy voted yes. Representative Aly voted yes.
• Representative Elberger voted no. Representative Davis voted yes. Representative Opel voted "I..."
• Representative Spar voted yes. Chairman Janigian voted yes.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first held a public hearing on HB 660, which would require historic horse racing facilities to pay 10% of HHR winnings to host communities as mitigation. Representative Om said the amendment was intended to leave charities and the state whole while funding local costs tied to large gaming facilities. Supporters argued the measure would address future municipal expenses, while opponents said host towns have not reported current problems and that the bill would single out one industry. Members questioned the 10% rate, whether the proposal was retroactive, and whether it would apply to existing facilities; the sponsor said it would apply to facilities already in place or later added. The hearing was then closed without any vote recorded in the transcript. The committee then opened a hearing on HB 658-FN, which raises reimbursement caps and adjusts fees for the Oil Discharge and Disposal Cleanup Fund and the Oil Pollution Control Fund. Representative Malloy introduced the bill, and Representative Aly explained the funds as a state-backed insurance mechanism for oil spill cleanup and prevention, including replacement of leaking home heating oil tanks for low-income homeowners. Bob Scully of the Energy Marketers Association supported the bill, saying the fee structure helps fund remediation and tank replacement, though costs are ultimately passed on to consumers. Department of Environmental Services officials Robert Bishop and Jennifer Marts described the bill as extending the fee collection for 10 years, changing reporting dates, increasing the cap for low-income tank replacement, and rebalancing fees based on an actuarial review. DES testified that the actuarial study found the fund needed to remain solvent and that home heating oil releases are the largest category of new releases, with the fuel oil fee otherwise needing to rise by more than 200% to cover projected costs. The board instead proposed a smaller increase and adjusted other fees accordingly, while maintaining a reserve to cover the first days of a major coastal spill before federal funds become available. Members asked about the basis for the fee changes, the role of the actuarial review, and the statutory language governing who pays the fees. The transcript ends during this hearing, with no final committee action or vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Mani Hiltsley votes I. >> Mani Hiltsley votes I.
• for a green vote. Thank you. for a green vote. Thank you.
• a no vote at this time. a no vote at this time.
• >> please vote green. >> please vote green.
• >> Mani Hiltsley votes I. >> Mani Hiltsley votes I.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The House first took up Senate File 334, a bill to modernize county human services technology used to administer programs such as Medicaid and SNAP. The author and several members described the current systems as outdated “green screen” platforms that are slow, duplicative, and difficult for workers and applicants, and argued modernization would improve service, retention, and fraud prevention. The bill would create a technology modernization fund with about $90 million over time, capped at $50 million, route funds through Minute, establish an interagency group with county representation, create a legislative working group, and provide $15 million for Office of Inspector General technology. Members from several counties spoke in strong support, citing local system failures, cyberattacks, and the need for better tools; one member noted the bill was about 20 years overdue. The bill passed third reading by a vote of 134-0, and a title was agreed to. The House then considered Senate File 4401, the cannabis bill. The author described it as a maintenance and cleanup package developed with more than 80 stakeholders over months of meetings, including business owners, labor, tribal representatives, and medical cannabis interests. The bill was presented as making noncontroversial adjustments to support small businesses, clarify statutes, improve privacy protections, adjust event and transporter rules, address good-faith errors, strengthen enforcement against unlicensed operators, and support local governments and municipal cannabis dispensaries. It also included a first step toward a medical psilocybin program and changes intended to make the medical cannabis market more sustainable, including easing the grow-and-sale ratio issue. The transcript cuts off before final action on this bill, but members speaking in support emphasized collaboration and the need for practical regulatory fixes.

Transcript Highlights:

• My no vote does not mean that’s my final vote. I need more information. I need to look at this.
• My no vote does not mean that’s my final vote. I need more information. I need to look at this.
• Democratic vote for that bill in either Democratic vote for that bill in either the<00:48:01.520>
• >> explain [clears throat] my I vote. >> explain [clears throat] my I vote.
• I will tell you, those that are voting I will tell you, those that are voting no<00:53:02.720>

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call: 0:03 Bills for Consideration: 3:10 Adjournment: 56:19, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Education Committee heard House Bill 1, which would have Kentucky opt into a federal education freedom tax credit program allowing donations to scholarship-granting organizations (SGOs) for K-12 educational expenses. The bill sponsors said it would not use Kentucky general funds, would be administered through the Secretary of State, and would let donors claim up to a $1,700 federal tax credit for contributions to SGOs. They argued the program could support public, private, religious, and homeschool-related educational needs, including tutoring, transportation, technology, special needs services, and other school expenses. Several senators raised concerns about whether the bill would favor larger districts with more school-choice options over rural counties with only one public school, creating a two-tier system. The sponsors responded that public school districts could also create SGOs and that the federal rules limit eligibility to families at or below 300% of area median gross income. They also said the program would not reduce existing state or federal school funding, but would instead redirect federal tax credit dollars that Kentucky donors might otherwise send to other states or back to the federal government. Members asked about the structure and oversight of SGOs, including whether they must be nonprofits, how broad their missions could be, and whether funds could be earmarked for specific purposes. The sponsors said SGOs must be certified, serve at least two schools and 10 students, spend at least 90% of receipts on scholarships, and cannot be directed to a specific student, though they can be targeted to categories such as elementary students or special needs services. They also said homeschool families would need to organize through a co-op or existing approved SGO. No vote was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Voting on HB2119. >> Thank you, chair. Voting on HB2119.
• Seeing none for vote. >> Thank you, Chair. Voting on HB 2459.
• Seeing none for<01:30:03.840> vote. for vote. for vote.
• Voting on HB2459. >> Thank you, chair. Voting on HB2459.
• Chair, vote. >> Thank you, Chair. Voting on HB 2194.

Bills: HB1621, HB1880, HB1831

Keywords: pesticides, environmental impact, agriculture, 1,3-dichloropropene, chlorpyrifos, land management, wastewater compliance, state funding, survey issues, 910, house, all

Summary: The joint committees on Agriculture and Food Systems and Energy and Environmental Protection heard three bills. HB 1621 would create a conservation, agriculture, and soil health incentive program under the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, with annual reporting and funding. Testimony was broadly supportive from the Climate Commission, University of Hawaiʻi, Hawaii Farmers Union, White Alliance for Progressive Action, and the Farm Bureau, and the bill was described as a way to advance soil health and support producers. HB 1880 would prohibit, beginning in 2027, the use of pesticides containing 1,3-dichloropropene (such as Telone). The Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity offered written comments, Hawaii Farmers Union supported the ban citing drift and health concerns, and the Farm Bureau opposed it, arguing growers need such tools; the bill also drew discussion about crop rotation and other pest-management practices. HB 1831 would authorize funding to address survey deficiencies and wastewater compliance issues on certain non-agricultural parklands; the Attorney General’s Office warned the bill as written may violate the U.S. Constitution’s contract clause and suggested revisions, while the department and Farm Bureau supported the measure’s intent. The committees later took up decision-making and voted to pass all three measures with amendments, with the effective dates changed to July 1, 3000 and HB 1831 amended to reflect the Attorney General’s suggested changes. The Agriculture and Food Systems committee then heard HB 1572, which would establish a four-year restorative aquaculture development program to streamline permitting, expand infrastructure and workforce capacity, create pilot sites, and convene an advisory council. The Attorney General noted a technical issue about whether council members would be compensated, and the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Farmers Union all expressed support for streamlining aquaculture and promoting restorative aquaculture. Members asked about the bill’s focus on restorative aquaculture, and the department said the program would give the area dedicated resources and a framework. The committee also heard HB 219, which would temporarily reestablish the coffee berry borer pesticide subsidy program and manager position; the department, Waimea Coffee Association, Farm Bureau, and Farmers Union supported it. HB 2139 would fund University of Hawaiʻi research on treatment methods for the Queensland longhorn beetle. Testimony from DLNR, the invasive species council, university researchers, farmers, and the Farm Bureau emphasized the beetle’s spread and damage to trees and crops, and described nematode biocontrol as promising but labor-intensive and in need of more research and scaling. Members asked whether the funding was for research rather than a position, whether the current nematode approach is sufficient for large orchards, and whether other controls are being explored; the response was that the bill funds testing and that more work is needed, including local production of nematodes if the method proves effective.

Transcript Highlights:

• We reconsider the vote. So a member can change their vote. I want to reconsider that vote. Mr.
• We consider the vote so a member can change their vote.
• I urge my colleagues to just pause and vote no. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
• House to adopt the committee report and vote yes.
• Speaker, I agree with the majority leader that we should vote yes. We need a budget, so vote yes.

Keywords: March 14, 2026 - Regular Session Part 4, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I would ask for a yes vote. That concludes debate. The vote on Senate Bill 1772 will now occur.
• Members, vote will now occur on Senate Bill 1958.
• and that you can vote legally and not illegally.
• Voting, I don't see that in the bill.
• To voting? Do you have language as it relates to that?

Bills: SB1772, SB1958, SB2010, SB1595, SB1687, SB1684, SB2049, SB1966

Keywords: motor vehicle safety, headlamps, headlights, fog lights, daytime running lights, auxiliary driving lamps, spot lamps, off-road lamps, bicycle lights, bicycle reflectors, vehicle lighting, roadway visibility, low visibility, rain, snow, wipers, night driving, traffic safety, Oklahoma Title 47, vehicle code

Transcript Highlights:

• Please vote no or refrain from voting. Thank you so much. All right, we have Me Toos.
• So please vote yes.
• So please vote yes.
• Can we get a roll call vote, please?
• Can we get a roll call vote, please?

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• is ought to pass by vote of 4 to 0. is ought to pass by vote of 4 to 0.
• The eyes have it by a vote of 15 to 8. The eyes have it by a vote of 15 to 8.
• rescind third reading vote on the ought to pass with amendment and vote on the floor amendment 1496.
• c> on ought to pass with amendment and vote on ought to pass with amendment and vote on the<01:03
• We have to have a series of votes to do that. The first vote is to rescind the third reading.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Thank you, Chair. Voting on SB 340, SD1.
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Thank you, Chair. Voting on SB 165, SD2.
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Thank you, Chair. Voting on SB 447.
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Thank you, Chair. Voting on SB 442, SD1.
• <01:03:17.960> on<01:03:18.079> SB the vote thank you chair voting on SB the vote thank

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• She then voted aye.
• aye aye member just bill you votes of seven I zero day and zero now voting aye members of your votes
• Members, the vote is seven ayes, zero nays, zero not voting, zero absent.
• Chair, I vote.
• Measure the vote: seven aye, zero nay, zero absent, zero not voting.

Bills: HB2163, HB2256, HB2305, HB2367, HB2369, HB2669, HB2772, HB2916, HCM2007, HCR2004, HR2003

Keywords: lighting laws, construction equipment, farm equipment, vehicle safety, Arizona Revised Statutes, salvage vehicles, insurance claims, abandoned vehicles, salvage auction dealers, vehicle title, towing regulation, private towing carriers, vehicle impound, towing rates, preemption, law enforcement, neighborhood electric vehicles, alternative fuel, vehicle license tax, tax exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing no other discussion, we'll go ahead and take a vote. We'll take a roll call vote on this.
• The House vote was seven yeas and four nays, and the Senate vote was zero yeas and two nays.
• I see no further light, so we'll go ahead and do a roll call vote. Roll call vote. Roll call vote.
• Seeing none, we'll place the vote.
• Roll call vote. This is for the substitute motion. Roll call vote: Senator Pitcher...

Keywords: 985, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Pizzo: I WILL VOTE FOR THIS BILL, I WILL NOT VOTE FOR IT AND OPPOSE IT IF WE CONSIDER THE HOUSE BUT IN
• BY YOUR VOTE SB 952 REPORTED FAVORABLY.
• I ASK YOU TO VOTE NO ON THIS BILL.
• GOING TO VOTE FOR THIS TODAY.
• BY YOUR VOTE SB 30 IS REPORTED FAVORABLY. YOU VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. WE WILL MOVE TO TABS 16.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We can vote on a block vote, and I would open that up for discussion now.
• Let's vote first then on the following appointees in block. We will vote in block.
• Please call the vote, Amanda. Senator Burgess. Please call the vote, Amanda. Senator Burgess.
• Would anyone like to record a vote?
• Would anyone like to record a vote?

Summary: The committee first took up a confirmation for UCF trustee reappointment candidate Mr. Christie, who described his long service on the board, his UCF business-school background, and his focus on strengthening UCF’s financial foundation, workforce alignment, and engineering and technology programs. Members praised his service and asked about UCF’s future direction, including its role in Florida’s space and engineering sectors. He was allowed to leave early for a meeting with the governor. The committee then heard the Higher Education Appropriations budget presentation for fiscal year 2025-26. The chair outlined a proposed $11.5 billion higher education budget emphasizing workforce education, Florida College System operations, career and technical education, the GATE program, nursing education through the Florida Center for Nursing, UF/IFAS agriculture technology, tutoring, autism and neurodevelopment services, student financial aid, and $250 million for state universities through the Board of Governors. Senator Davis asked about line grant flexibility, and the chair said a conforming bill would address details. The committee adopted a motion allowing technical corrections and then adopted the budget proposal as a recommendation to the full Appropriations Committee. The remainder of the meeting focused on confirmations for university boards, especially the University of West Florida, where several nominees were questioned about Title IX compliance, free speech, workforce readiness, military/veteran ties, and prior statements about privatization and higher education. Rebecca Matthews, Rachel Moyah, Ashley Ross, and Adam Kessel each described their backgrounds and goals for UWF; Kessel faced extensive questioning about his past writings on privatization, the GI Bill, and speech suppression, and said he would not recommend privatizing Florida universities and supported veterans’ education benefits. Public testimony on UWF was largely opposed, with speakers arguing the nominees lacked local ties and warning the slate would harm the university and community. The committee also heard from FAMU reappointment nominee Judge Belvin Perry, who emphasized student success, workforce quality, and FAMU’s continued rise, and from UCF nominee Mark Philburn and FSU nominee Peter Jones, both of whom highlighted their professional experience and commitment to student success and prudent stewardship. The meeting extended its time to 6:30 p.m. to continue hearing nominees and public testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, and when explaining your vote, first cast your vote, then explain. Does anyone have any guests?
• Senator Elkins voted aye.
• uh to vote law. uh to vote law.
• I'm going to vote no.
• vote, Chair? Yes, please. Thank you. vote, Chair? Yes, please. Thank you.

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:10 Attendance Roll Call: 00:19 HB 10 Discussion: 02:19 HB 10 Vote: 06:24 HB 139 Discussion: 08:23 HB 139 Vote: 19:50 HB 607 Discussion: 21:29 HB 607 Vote: 25:55 HB 642 Discussion: 28:15 HB 642 Vote: 32:06 Adjournment: 33:25, 958, all