Transcript Highlights:

• legislation, we would support the bills. legislation, we would support the bills.
• the legislation.
• the consent of those legislative bodies. the consent of those legislative bodies.
• And I'm by the legislative body.
• subject to amendment by the legislative subject to amendment by the legislative body

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to school shootings while legislators to school shootings while legislators with<00:21:26.720>
• over any new legislation. over any new legislation.
• against a legislator against a legislator uh<01:57:44.560> just<01:57:44.719> today.
• buildings, schools, and legislative buildings, schools, and legislative assemblies assemblies assemblies
• her intention is to lay the bill over.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is in alignment with legislative intent language that was included in the 2024 Budget Act.
• Legislative Analyst's Office, please.
• Natalie Gonzalez with the Legislative Analyst's Office.
• Natalie Gonzalez with the Legislative Analyst's Office.
• Need to know what the legislative intent was for a code section that appeared in 1978?

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance met to review CSU and State Library budget issues, enrollment trends, the Capital Fellows program, and a Title IX update. Chair David Alvarez opened by stressing that CSU faces serious financial pressure, including a systemwide deficit and proposed cuts that he and several members said were too large and likely to harm access, course offerings, and student services. Public comment focused heavily on the Braille Institute Library, with patrons, staff, veterans, and advocates urging restoration of funding and warning that the proposed cut would severely affect blind and visually impaired Californians across Southern California. Several CSU faculty, staff, and union representatives also opposed the proposed reductions and warned of larger class sizes, fewer sections, and layoffs. On the CSU core operations item, the Department of Finance explained the Governor’s proposal to reduce ongoing General Fund support by about $375 million and defer a 5% base increase, while the LAO said CSU core funding would be roughly flat once tuition and targeted augmentations were considered, but warned that rising costs and prior shortfalls would still force campuses to cut spending. CSU’s Chancellor’s Office said the proposed cut would deepen existing problems, citing prior-year budget gaps, job losses, reduced course sections, and student-service reductions. Members pressed Finance and the LAO on whether cuts could be made more surgically, especially at the Chancellor’s Office or in institutional support rather than in instruction, and the LAO said the Legislature has flexibility to target cuts more specifically. CSU also described ongoing consolidation efforts, including shared services among campuses and the planned Cal Maritime/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo integration, while cautioning that savings are not yet fully known. The committee then discussed CSU enrollment. The LAO recommended holding enrollment targets flat because the budget does not add new funding, while CSU reported strong recent growth, including more California residents, record first-year enrollment, and expanded direct admissions and transfer pathways. Members questioned why some campuses with high demand turn away many applicants while others continue to lose enrollment, and CSU said it is shifting resources from campuses with sustained declines to those with demand, using a 10% below-target threshold. The committee also discussed whether enrollment declines mirror local population trends, how to improve marketing and program alignment, and whether lessons from Cal Poly Humboldt’s conversion could inform other campuses such as Sonoma State. The Capital Fellows item drew a Finance proposal for a salary increase and an LAO counterproposal for a smaller raise plus future COLA language; the committee kept the item open. Finally, CSU reported progress on Title IX compliance, saying it has completed most State Auditor recommendations, expanded civil rights staffing, and increased training, prevention, and case-management efforts, though members asked how proposed budget cuts might affect those services.

Transcript Highlights:

• legislation legislation to<00:48:52.920> stand<00:48:53.280> up<00:48:53.400> for
• intention of this amendment is. I've intention of this amendment is.
• I understand the intent of it. stay. I understand the intent of it.
• So that was the pure intent of it.
• So that was the pure intent of it.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Just recently, Senator Schatz and Senator Cruz introduced bipartisan legislation on the federal level
• Just recently, Senator Schatz and Senator Cruz introduced bipartisan legislation on the federal level
• Just recently, Senator Schatz and Senator Cruz introduced bipartisan legislation on the federal level
• Just recently, Senator Schatz and Senator Cruz introduced bipartisan legislation on the federal level
• The intent really should be focused on processed raw AI, nothing else, not canned tuna, you know.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with HB 205 HD1 and HB 480 HD1 on workers’ compensation. Testifiers from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and the Department of Human Resources Development supported the bills, with DLIR saying HB 205 would codify and regulate nonprescription over-the-counter drugs at a reasonable rate, and DHRD saying HB 480 would encourage timely and accurate assessments of injured workers’ physical abilities. No opposition was raised on those measures, and the committee moved on without votes or amendments noted. On HB 331 HD1 relating to permits, the University of Hawaiʻi, the Department of Education, and the Hawaii School Facilities Authority supported the bill, while the Board of Water Supply and Greg Mikan opposed it. Supporters did not elaborate much beyond standing on written testimony, but the School Facilities Authority asked that renovations be added to the definition of repeatable projects. Opponents argued the Department of Planning and Permitting is understaffed and that bypassing or speeding the permitting review process could create problems, especially for projects requiring proper engineering review. No action was taken beyond hearing testimony. The committee also heard HB 72 HD1 on pharmacy technician regulation, with the Board of Pharmacy offering comments and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association, Walgreens, and Mōʻiliʻili Drugs supporting the measure. Supporters said pharmacy technicians already perform essential duties such as vaccinations, compounding, inventory, and dispensing, and argued Hawaiʻi is the only state without an active managed list of practicing pharmacy technicians. On HB 139 HD1 regarding insurance, the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs offered comments, and the Hawaii Society for Clinical Oncologists supported the bill, arguing fertility preservation coverage should not conflict with federal law or the prepaid health care system. On HB 32 HD1 relating to cannabis, the Attorney General and Department of Health raised concerns about allowing purchase before certification is approved, while the Hawaii Cannabis Industry Association supported the bill and suggested lowering the purchase limit from 2 ounces to 1 ounce; the Department of Health said its average turnaround is two to three business days, with about 20% of applications returned for incompleteness and an internal expedited process for certain cases. Later, the committee heard HB 470 HD1 on noise, with the Department of Health supporting the goal of reducing noise pollution but cautioning that regulating intermittent noise like string trimmers is complicated, while the Retail Merchants of Hawaiʻi opposed the bill as a hardship for small businesses and questioned the practicality of battery-powered equipment. Ted Bolan supported the measure, saying it would not ban gas leaf blowers but would require quieter models over time. The committee then heard HB 534 HD1 on labeling requirements, where DLNR and the Department of Agriculture offered comments and several fishing and consumer groups supported the bill. Testimony focused on seafood origin labeling, especially raw tuna used in poke and sushi, with DLNR explaining the bill was being narrowed to avoid federal preemption and to avoid unintentionally covering canned tuna or other processed products. Finally, the committee heard H47 HD1 on aquaculture, with the Department of Agriculture, the Hawaii Invasive Species Council, and the Agribusiness Development Corporation supporting the measure; no votes were taken on any bill during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• The intent is to invalidate the new legislation. And so I would expect no action to be taken.
• Intent is to invalidate the new legislation. And so. And I would expect no action to be taken.
• And we would hope that proposed legislation for an ongoing COLA could be developed over the next biennium
• No, I definitely appreciate legislation like that so that we didn't have to revisit you every interim
• So that's kind of where the legislative recommendation was coming from: just recommending that, yes,

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: The Executive Committee approved the April minutes by roll call vote, with members present voting aye and the minutes adopted. Staff then provided an Attorney General update on pension-related litigation, including the newly filed Dawson class action challenging Gross Second Substitute House Bill 2034, the concluded Dolan case, and the Fowler case, where the trial court orally ruled for plaintiffs on interest calculations and potential disgorgement of state gains, with a written ruling still pending. Committee members emphasized the need for ongoing monitoring and regular reporting on the Dawson case because of its potential impact on the committee and retirement systems. An actuarial update followed, noting that June will include the preliminary 2025 valuation results and contribution-rate information, along with commentary on the demographic experience study. Staff said actuarial resources are limited and asked that any additional actuarial agenda items be scheduled for July or later. The committee also discussed the draft interim work plan and agreed to move the OSA annual update to July. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on Plan 1 COLA policy. Retiree representatives urged the committee to keep working on both immediate ad hoc COLA relief and a longer-term ongoing COLA solution. Members discussed a possible budget proviso requiring legislators to consider a COLA each budget cycle, and staff was asked to develop proposals for further discussion. The committee also agreed to add a June briefing on the PERS/PEACERS request involving animal control technicians, and to include an introductory Plan 3 briefing, with possible comparison to Plan 2, on the June agenda. Staff also explained changes to correspondence handling, including removing letters from the public website to better protect privacy while still making records available upon request. The committee approved the revised June agenda and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Chamberlain described the intent of this to be for job development, including... mentioning the
• Our current affordability crisis will not be solved by passing legislation that would give our citizens
• Please vote no on this legislation. Thank you. Thank you for being here, Dr. Rich Templin. Hello.
• Now this legislation around line 61 now has, with the amendment that was adopted last week, which was
• Sit down with any legislator about coming up with good, effective ways to do workforce training and to

Transcript Highlights:

• And as legislators, we were pointing out to taxpayers, you know, take a look at that legislative tax
• it's like one it's one line change to the legislation but from a It's like one line change to the legislation
• or the legislative process would need.
• Ultimately, the full committee would have to do the recommending to Legislative Management, and Legislative
• Management then to the next legislative assembly.

Summary: The subcommittee of the Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee met to begin its study of whether the content of the real estate tax statement should be revised to improve transparency. Legislative Council staff reviewed the study directive from HB 1176 and the statutory requirements for tax statements, including required line items such as true and full value, mill levy, legislative tax relief, primary residence credit, legacy fund share, discounts for early payment, and special assessments. The Tax Department then explained how the current uniform statewide statement is prescribed and approved, and noted that changes are typically driven by statute and implemented collaboratively with counties and vendors. County officials from NDACO, including auditors from McKenzie and Richland counties, described the full annual property tax timeline from budgeting through mailing final statements. They explained how counties gather budgets, calculate levies, verify taxable values, handle centrally assessed property, and prepare required notices and statements. They also said public attendance at budget hearings is generally very low, though the notices and statements generate some calls, mostly about whether attendance is required or why taxes are changing. Several members questioned the usefulness of the legislative tax relief line and the complexity of the 5% discount calculation, and county officials said the current process can be confusing and depends on manual data entry and coordination among counties, vendors, and taxing districts. The committee also discussed assessment frequency, valuation equalization, the 3% cap, and whether more frequent reassessment would reduce large jumps in taxable value. County officials said they try to use rotating reassessments and sales-ratio reviews to keep values within statutory tolerance, but staffing, training, and local market changes make the work difficult. NDACO staff estimated, based on a small county survey, that tax statement preparation and mailing costs average about 74 cents per statement, with outsourcing generally cheaper than in-house printing, and said HB 1176 added some mailing and administrative costs even if the tax statement itself did not change dramatically. Software vendors from CPT and Tyler then began presentations showing how their systems handle budgeting, valuation notices, tax statement generation, primary residence credit processing, and levy worksheets, emphasizing that many of the required calculations and reports are still manually entered or verified by county staff.

Transcript Highlights:

• The intention is to committee today.
• must pass similar legislation. must pass similar legislation.
• <00:36:20.400> aimed 3685 is that similar legislation aimed 3685 is that similar legislation
• Um, again, the intent of this legislation is not to regulate the publishing industry.
• than answers and why I think the intent than answers and why I think the intent is<01:09:52.799>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• By the way, we write a piece of legislation on this?
• We as legislators can't separate that.
• So the intent is to have all of the value of the service, right?
• I don't think that's the intent, but it is an unfortunate...
• And it's been very hard to manage being a legislator now, right? But look, we have...

Bills: HB4806

Keywords: civil action, damages, health care services, noneconomic damages, negligence, legal standards, 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'm going to say this too; this is my fourth legislative session carrying this bill, and we get it
• But clearly, from a legislative standpoint, it's up to $1,200. It's up to $1,200.
• That this legislation is the opposite of protecting children and families in Texas.
• I'm testifying against HB1738, and I believe I understand what the author's intent here is.
• To consider legislators to protect these groups as well.

Bills: HB 1194, HB 1221, HB1738, HB1913, HB2177, HB2178, HB2180, HB2229, HB2282, HB2448, HB2492, HB2777, HB2984, HB3357, HB3553, HB3602

Keywords: emergency protection order, protective order, magistrate, criminal procedure, victim safety, family violence, domestic violence, stalking, assault, magistrate's order, temporary protection, court order duration, defendant restrictions, Article 17.292, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, emergency restraining order, victim protection, firearm restriction, pretrial intervention, reimbursement fee

Transcript Highlights:

• We have an election in 2026. 201 legislators will be up for election.
• We have an election in 2026. 201 legislators will be up for election.
• We have an election in 2026. 201 legislators will be up for election.
• in 2026. 201 legislators will be up for um<00:26:09.679> election.
• And again, the intent is to make sure that this is plain.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have the same intent for this bill, and I don't anticipate issues with getting to the same place.
• uh for this bill and I I same intent uh for this bill and I I don't<00:08:00.560> anticipate<
• I'm the legislative director at the Department of Labor and Industry.
• Chair, that this is the way legislation should be working. It should be bipartisan.
• <00:13:33.440> should<00:13:33.680> be uh this is the way legislation should be uh

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you, Madam Chair, for hearing this piece of legislation. Yeah, thank you for bringing it.
• Thank you very much for working on this important legislation.
• um I'm a big supporter and I legislation um I'm a big supporter and I I<00:18:22.600> think<00
• > all<00:20:36.880> right<00:20:37.840> well<00:20:38.480> um For all intents
• and purposes we are um for all intents and purposes we are um finished<00:21:08.200> with<00:

Keywords: 00:00 Call to Order/Roll Call 01:23 Discussion of 25RS HB 219 06:40 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HB 219 07:44 Discussion of 25RS HCR 20 09:36 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HCR 20 10:58 Discussion of 25RS HB 303 17:02 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HB 303 18:38 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations 21:46 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Health Services met with a quorum and first considered House Bill 219, sponsored by Representative Rebecca Raymer. The bill requires emergency services to provide mandatory training for emergency medical staff on sexual assault emergency response requirements, with the training developed in collaboration with the Sexual Assault Response Team advisory committee. Testimony from Jenna Cassidy of the Kentucky Association of Sexual Assault Programs and WN Stevens of Children’s Advocacy Centers of Kentucky explained that the training would help emergency department staff properly respond to sexual assault patients, preserve evidence, and connect patients to needed resources; the committee also clarified that the bill is training-focused and not a certification requirement. HB 219 received favorable expression and was reported to the House floor. The committee then heard House Concurrent Resolution 20, also from Representative Raymer, which directs the Legislative Research Commission to study gaps in sexual assault nurse examiner coverage, why those gaps exist, and what hospitals do when no SANE nurse is available. Raymer said the study was intended to gather data for future legislation, and members noted the importance of documenting current practices and supporting efforts to expand SANE coverage. The resolution was adopted with 16 favorable votes and recommended for passage on the House floor. Next, the committee took up House Bill 303, sponsored by Representative Steve Bratcher, which creates a pathway for military medical personnel to translate their training into civilian Kentucky credentials through colleges and universities. The committee substitute broadened participation beyond KCTCS to any Kentucky institution with accredited programs, and Bratcher explained that schools would evaluate military experience, award applicable credit, identify gaps, and still require the relevant licensure exam. Members asked about university participation, credentialing standards, and how prior military radiology training would transfer; Bratcher said the program is voluntary for institutions and works with existing SkillBridge and veterans’ programs. HB 303, as amended by committee substitute, passed unanimously and was recommended for passage. At the end of the meeting, the committee briefly reviewed administrative regulations. Representative Fleming asked about a behavioral regulation that had previously been found sufficient, and staff indicated it had been deferred, later found deficient again in the Senate Health Services Committee, and may be addressed through Senate Bill 65. The chair then allowed members to record additional votes before adjourning and announced the next Health Services meeting would be February 20 at noon in Room 149.

Transcript Highlights:

• If the intent of this language is to ensure state attorneys can see these dismissals, we believe the
• It prohibits tampering or harassment of court officials with the intent to influence or retaliate against
• Was there a particular case incident that influenced this legislation? You're recognized, Senator.
• But I see my role, our role as legislators, to protect the most innocent against the most heinous.
• I look at that, and it wasn't my intent. You're recognized to go back and forth. Thank you.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Helen Kersey with the Legislative Analyst's Office.
• It's a different intent than generally what the public agencies do.
• Legislative Analyst's Office. Thanks so much for including us today.
• The intent is not to strong arm or force any of the local agencies.
• We're only halfway through, almost halfway through the legislative session.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But we did create, in the past, legislation.
• to put this possible legislation to put this possible legislation somewhere<00:36:53.520> stud
• so again some preemptive uh legislation so again some preemptive uh legislation might<00:40:31.520
• <01:02:47.119> being concerns with this legislation being concerns with this legislation being
• He signed the legislation.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard testimony on House Bill 167, which would add ski, snowboard, and boat wax containing PFAS to the state’s consumer-product restrictions. The sponsor argued the product is already banned in many places, has PFAS-free alternatives, and is used in ways that can directly contaminate water rather than landfills. She cited high PFAS levels in several New Hampshire lakes and said the bill was a simple extension of prior PFAS legislation. A witness also described a personal experience where a liquid ski wax disappeared from the market and later returned, likely because of PFAS concerns. The chair then closed the hearing on HB 167 without a vote. The committee then opened a hearing on House Bill 312, dealing with college athletes’ name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights. Representative Moffett said the bill was modeled on New Jersey law and intended to let student-athletes earn compensation from NIL without losing institutional scholarships, while also requiring licensed representation and setting limits on certain endorsements. He described the measure as proactive because NIL rules are evolving and could create conflicts among schools and future lawsuits. Members questioned whether the bill should apply to two-year institutions, whether it should exclude firearms and weapons, and whether the scholarship protections would cover need-based or academic aid as well as athletic scholarships. Moffett said the scholarship language was intended to protect scholarships generally, but not need-based aid specifically, and he acknowledged discomfort with some of the endorsement restrictions. Public testimony on HB 312 was mixed. One supporter, a former Division III athlete and coach, backed the bill but urged removal of a section allowing institutions or athletic bodies to use an athlete’s NIL without compensation, arguing most New Hampshire athletes do not receive NIL money and should not have to work extra jobs to cover basic expenses. The chair also raised concerns about the bill’s contractual and identity-rights implications, referencing prior committee work on a J.D. Salinger-related identity case and noting the committee had previously declined to get involved in similar contractual disputes. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• earlier legislation when the two conflict.
• <01:44:09.520> of I I don't think is the intention of I I don't think is the intention of
• self-determination gaming legislation self-determination gaming legislation should<02:20:24.720>
• completed before any legislative completed before any legislative structure<02:20:55.560> is<
• that happen both within the legislation that happen both within the legislation and<02:24:17.240

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• No, that is not the intent.
• previously passed legislation requiring a detailed study of property tax reform.
• We do legislation all the time.
• Not because this is his policy, his legislation. Again, this was something he was given.
• And so, of course, most of these bills were not heard during this legislative session.

Summary: The Senate took up Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 2F, a proposed constitutional amendment on property tax reform. The measure would increase the homestead exemption in stages, lower the assessment cap on non-homestead property from 10% to 5%, and limit county and municipal ad valorem tax revenues to specified uses such as public safety, education, infrastructure, natural resources, debt service, employee benefits, and certain administrative costs. Supporters, led by Senator Avila, argued the proposal would provide meaningful property tax relief and push local governments to rein in spending, while opponents warned it would shift costs to fees, reduce local flexibility, and threaten funding for core services. Several amendments were offered and rejected. Senator Sharief proposed an income-based circuit breaker for property tax relief; Senator Smith offered a sunset clause; and Senator Berman proposed revising the ballot statement to better match the amended proposal and remove outdated references. Each amendment failed on recorded votes. During questioning and debate, senators pressed Avila on the ballot language, the effect on local services, whether the legislature could later restrict local spending by statute, and whether renters would benefit. Avila said the ballot language was not his and repeatedly stated he was presenting the governor’s proposal, while also saying local governments would need to prioritize budgets and that future legislatures could address implementation details. After the amendment votes, the joint resolution was read a third time and moved into final debate. Supporters said the proposal would give homeowners relief and force fiscal discipline at the local level. Opponents, including Senators Nathan, Bracey Davis, Smith, Polsky, and Errington, argued the measure was rushed, lacked a completed fiscal analysis or replacement revenue, and could harm police, fire, libraries, parks, housing, and other local services. They also criticized the ballot summary as misleading, especially regarding the staged homestead exemption increase. The transcript ends during debate, before any final vote on the joint resolution itself.

Transcript Highlights:

• The legislation that's before you, Mr. The legislation that's before you, Mr.
• This bill has great intentions. This bill has great intentions.
• this legislative session. this legislative session.
• The The intent the intent of the bill.
• according to this legislation. according to this legislation.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all