Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair, members.
• Chair, members.

Committee: House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• of a committee member or another speaker.
• </c> under this subsection may be conducted under this subsection may be conducted by<00:21:37.360><c
• </c><00:42:39.920><c> required</c> provisional ballots, conduct required provisional ballots, conduct
• </c> not apply to judges appointed to conduct not apply to judges appointed to conduct recounts<00:46
• This amendment allows that conduct.

Bills: SF0028 , SF0030 , SF0031 , SF0032

Committee: House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:

• Good afternoon, Chair, Vice Chair, members of the committee. My name is San Goram.
• Good afternoon, Chair, Vice Chair, members of the committee.
• Hello, Chair, Vice Chair, members of the committee.
• </c><00:05:39.720><c> criminal</c> by adding the words may conduct criminal by adding the words may conduct
• Members, any questions?

Committee: Senate Labor and Technology

Summary: The Library and Technology Committee met on March 14, 2025, to hear House Bill 430, House Draft 2, which would create an internship/on-the-job training program administered by the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, with the state serving as the responsible employer for workers’ compensation coverage and appropriations included. Testimony was uniformly supportive from the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, the University of Hawaii, the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, and the Department of Education. Supporters emphasized the value of internships as a high-impact educational and career pathway opportunity. The Department of the Attorney General supported the bill’s intent but raised a concern about the criminal history background check language, recommending that the bill be revised so DLIR may conduct checks “as appropriate” rather than requiring a mandatory check for all interns. The AG noted that juvenile records would remain confidential for 16- and 17-year-old interns under existing law and suggested deleting the more specific background-check language or replacing it with the more flexible wording. Several organizations submitted support, including business, health care, tourism, and industry groups. During decision-making, the committee discussed amendments incorporating the Attorney General’s recommendation, adding a 2.5 GPA minimum reference, and clarifying language about private or public sector organizations and placement of interns in state executive branch departments, agencies, or programs. The committee adopted the recommendation to pass the bill with amendments, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and members.
• Honorable Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• We'll conduct the roll.
• Chair and members.

Committee: House Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, welcome back.
• Where we should conduct audits.
• We conduct...
• Our office is a member.
• I'm here as a member of this...

Summary: The Senate Finance Committee met to hear interim charges on higher education transparency and on preventing fraud, waste, and abuse in state government. The chair emphasized accountability for taxpayer dollars and asked witnesses to address financial reporting, audit practices, and whether more frequent or comprehensive audits would improve oversight. Legislative Budget Board staff described how public university systems and most community colleges respond to requests about internal audit practices, noting that university systems generally follow a similar annual audit timeline and that community colleges use a more varied mix of internal and external audit arrangements. Members focused on gaps in reporting, especially Texas Southern University’s missing submissions for several years and Collin County Community College’s nonresponse to the LBB survey. The State Auditor’s Office then outlined its higher education audit work, including mandatory statewide single audits, DEI compliance audits, HUB and State Use Program audits, benefits proportional audits, and discretionary audits based on risk. The auditor said the office has released 43 higher-ed audit reports since fiscal year 2021 and has two audits in progress, and explained that internal audit reports from institutions help guide future audit selection. Senators pressed the office on the lack of enforcement authority, the value of internal auditors at each institution, and whether community colleges should have more standardized reporting and audit requirements. The auditor and general counsel said the SAO can refer suspected fraud to law enforcement but cannot itself enforce findings, while several senators suggested stronger clawback authority and more robust internal audit structures. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board explained that it collects annual financial reports, sources-and-uses data, and community college finance reports, and uses them for funding formulas and other reporting. It also trains governing board members and said it has limited regulatory authority, though community colleges must certify compliance annually and can lose eligibility for state funds if they do not. Members questioned the reliability of self-attested data, the adequacy of board training, and whether a single reporting structure would be more efficient. During public testimony, a ScholarShot representative argued for clearer, student-facing financial transparency so students can see total cost of attendance and the gap they must cover before enrolling.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, co-chair, members of the J-LAC committee.
• Chairman, Member Ligori, I'm not aware of the full details.
• Co-Chairman, J-LAC members.
• Co-Chair, members of the committee.
• We've had a three-member board, and in some cases a two-member board forever, and at no point in time

Committee: Joint Joint Legislative Audit Committee

Summary: The committee first heard an update on Topok Elementary School District’s long-running noncompliance with Arizona’s Uniform System of Financial Records. The Auditor General’s office explained the USFR noncompliance process and reported that Topok had made substantial progress, correcting many deficiencies in areas such as open meeting law, procurement, payroll, attendance reporting, property control, and information technology. The district’s superintendent and staff described the corrective actions they had taken, the use of outside consultants, and their plan to maintain compliance through stronger leadership, training, and consistent procedures. Members praised the district’s progress and asked about the remaining deficiencies and the status of the 3% state-aid withholding, which the Auditor General said would be addressed by the State Board of Education. The committee then considered a request for a fourth school safety special audit, tied to concerns raised by Representative Martinez about Phoenix Union High School District and school violence response practices. The Auditor General said the proposed audit would be a new topic focused on policies and procedures for responding to credible threats of violence and allegations of staff misconduct affecting student safety, and could include Phoenix Union in the sample. Representative Martinez described a fatal 2024 shooting, weapons incidents, and concerns about district oversight. The committee approved the motion 10-0. Next, staff presented the fiscal years 2027-2028 school district performance audit schedule, describing 26 randomly selected school districts and career and technical education districts, plus 84 planned follow-ups. The Auditor General said the schedule is intended to shorten the average time between audits and that the school audits division is now fully staffed. Members asked about county coverage and the inclusion of ESA accountability, but the schedule was ultimately presented for review rather than approval. The committee also heard a detailed federal compliance audit presentation on the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) administered by DES. The Auditor General reported repeated findings involving missing provider documentation, questioned costs, and FFATA reporting errors, including a 2024 sample that led to questioning $2.88 million in costs. The office recommended stronger documentation, record retention, reporting procedures, and staff training; DES concurred and said it would correct the findings in 2026. Members discussed the limits of the single-audit scope, the possibility of a broader special audit, and the federal government’s recent actions on CCDF oversight in other states. Finally, the committee considered and discussed a special audit request for CCDF that would broaden review to provider oversight, licensing, site visits, and billing accuracy across multiple state agencies, with estimated costs of $547,000 to $625,000 and a projected report date of July 31, 2027.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> of the criminal sexual conduct of the criminal sexual conduct statutes<00:13:05.600><c> and</c><
• </c><00:13:27.880><c> for</c> same as criminal sexual conduct for same as criminal sexual conduct for
• </c><00:13:59.800><c> so</c> degree uh criminal sexual conduct so degree uh criminal sexual conduct so
• criminal sexual predatory conduct the criminal sexual predatory conduct the use<00:25:29.159><c> of</
• Chair and members.

Committee: House Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> the the the agencies thems they conduct the the the agencies thems they conduct these<00:31:02.000
• </c> document right here the code of conduct document right here the code of conduct it<00:57:10.760>
• again I would encourage all the conduct again I would encourage all the members<01:08:57.920><c> of<
• c> this</c> code of conduct whether it's this code of conduct whether it's this booklet<01:09:01.960>
• Chair, members of the committee.

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met to hear House Bill 520, which would authorize the Department of Education to issue subpoenas in investigations and hearings involving the code of conduct for New Hampshire educators. Representative Lynn, the bill sponsor, said the measure was intended to give the department standard subpoena power during investigations and in later adjudicatory proceedings, with a process for challenging overbroad subpoenas. He argued that agencies with investigative and hearing authority should also have the power to compel witnesses and documents, and said the bill was narrowed from an earlier broader draft to focus on teacher credentialing and address concerns about scope. Members raised several concerns about whether the department already has enough authority, whether the Attorney General could handle subpoenas instead, and whether the bill creates an imbalance by giving subpoena power mainly to the investigating side. Representative Burroughs said she did not feel she had enough information and was uncomfortable with the bill, especially regarding who bears subpoena costs. Representative Biron questioned the trial analogy and whether both sides truly have equal subpoena rights. Lynn responded that the investigative stage is like a grand jury process, where only the investigating body subpoenas witnesses, while the adjudicatory stage allows both sides to seek subpoenas through the hearing officer. Other questions focused on the bill’s scope. Representative Andreos asked what investigative authority the Department of Education already has, and Representative Organ questioned why the bill is limited to educators rather than also covering vendors, charter school boards, or the EFA scholarship organization. Lynn said the limitation to educators was deliberate, because earlier broader versions drew objections for being too expansive. Representative Tur asked whether the Attorney General could already handle such matters, and Lynn said that while the AG might be able to pursue some investigations or court subpoenas, agencies should be able to conduct their own internal investigations. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Committee members and members of the public can participate either in person or virtually through Zoom
• Chair, members of the committee. HB 429.
• Good afternoon, members of the committee.
• The key question is generally whether the deceptive conduct, the underlying deceptive conduct, affects
• Afternoon, members of the committee.

Summary: The committee heard several bills, but much of the meeting focused on House Bill 306, which would require disclosure when a consumer is interacting with a chatbot rather than a human. Sponsor Senator Townsend described it as a consumer protection measure and said the bill is meant to keep pace with rapidly changing AI technology. Committee members and witnesses raised concerns about the bill’s enforcement structure, especially private rights of action and penalties that could apply even without actual consumer harm. The Department of Justice said the bill would apply where the conduct has a Delaware nexus, and that the disclosure requirement is the key consumer protection. Industry witnesses and chambers of commerce opposed the bill as drafted, arguing it would create broad compliance burdens and expose businesses to excessive litigation risk without a harm requirement or clearer safe harbor language. Earlier in the meeting, the committee discussed House Bill 429, which would update Delaware’s step therapy exception process to include biosimilars and interchangeable biologics. Senator Poore and supporters from Highmark and the Department of Insurance said the bill would modernize insurance law, improve access to effective treatments, and reduce costs; they cited national savings from biosimilars and said the bill has agency support. Members asked about Delaware-specific savings, patient switching, and how the process would work, but no vote was taken during the discussion. The committee also heard House Bill 310, which would exclude large data centers from Blue Collar Jobs Act tax credits; the sponsor said the bill is intended to ensure large energy users contribute more to state and local revenues, while supporters and opponents debated competitiveness and community impacts. House Bill 406, on allowing insureds to choose their auto repair shop, and Senate Bill 347, a cleanup bill related to medical debt collection and personal property levies, were also presented without opposition in the hearing. House Bill 253, concerning who may receive letters testamentary or of administration, was described as a cleanup to align statute with existing practice. The committee approved the meeting minutes, but the transcript does not show final votes on the bills discussed.

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you, Chair No and members of the committee.
• </c><00:19:50.240><c> Members,</c><00:19:51.039><c> we</c><00:19:51.280><c> have</c> to member discussion
• Members, we have to member discussion?
• So criminal conduct, they refer to us.
• I want to thank all members. This is a good bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Let's conduct the roll for AB 486 by Assembly Member Lackey.
• Chair and members.
• Let's conduct the roll.
• By my count, we are waiting on Assembly Member Haney and Assembly Member Harabedian.
• We are waiting on Assembly Member Haney and Assembly Member Harabedian.

Committee: House Public Safety

Summary: The Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety met to consider two bills, both on concurrence in Senate amendments. Assembly Bill 486 by Assembly Member Lackey would add key programming devices and key duplication devices to the list of burglary tools, with the author and the California Police Chiefs Association arguing these electronic devices are increasingly used in auto theft and related crimes and that the bill appropriately requires felonious intent. Support also came from the California State Sheriffs’ Association, the City of Thousand Oaks, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, and the Riverside Sheriff’s Association/California Narcotics Officers Association; there was no opposition. The committee voted to concur in the Senate amendments. Assembly Bill 1152 by Assembly Member Patterson would exempt prescriptions for human chorionic gonadotropin, a fertility-related medication, from reporting to the Department of Justice, with the author saying the current controlled-substance reporting requirement is unnecessary and raises privacy concerns for Californians undergoing fertility treatment. No support or opposition testimony was offered. The committee voted to concur in the Senate amendments. After the votes were taken, the chair noted the committee might return later for another bill, Assembly Bill 1127 by Assembly Member Gabriel, pending transmission from the Senate. The meeting then adjourned after all measures were reported out.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, and ranking member of members of the committee. For the record, I'm Addison Richards.
• Thank you, Chair Goodman, Ranking Member Graham, and members of the committee.
• Chair, members of the committee.
• Chair, members of the committee.
• Okay, good afternoon, Chair Goodman, Ranking Member Graham, and members of the committee.

Bills: HB1228 , HB1239 , HB2310 , HB2464

Committee: House Community Safety

Keywords: DUI, driving under the influence, impaired driving, toxicology, forensic toxicology, breath test, blood test, THC, marijuana, cannabis, alcohol concentration, state toxicologist, implied consent, evidence admissibility, venous blood draw, forensic phlebotomist, certified laboratory, accredited laboratory, law enforcement, DWI

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair, members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.

Summary: The committee heard several public safety bills and took testimony on each, with members often noting amendments and continuing negotiations. SB 1009 by Senator Becker would require juvenile courts to find that less restrictive alternatives are unsuitable before ordering detention, and would require periodic review of continued detention and consideration of alternatives at disposition. Supporters argued it would reduce unnecessary youth detention and improve transparency; probation, judges, and police groups opposed it as an undue limit on judicial discretion and potentially unsafe in serious cases. The chair said he would recommend an aye with amendments, but the bill was held pending quorum and later remained on call. SB 1130 by Senator Gomez Reyes would update privacy law for wearable recording devices such as smart glasses, requiring consent before recording in places where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy and banning devices or accessories designed to defeat recording indicators. Supporters said the bill addresses secret recording and invasive surveillance; opponents from tech and hospitality groups sought clarification to avoid unintended liability for businesses and exempt workplace communication devices. Members discussed those exemptions, and the chair recommended an aye, but the measure also remained on call. Senator Blake Spear presented SB 99, which would let courts consider military protective orders in domestic violence proceedings and require better communication between civilian law enforcement and military authorities. Supporters from the Department of Defense, local officials, and military representatives said it would close protection gaps for military families; the ACLU opposed it on due process grounds because MPOs are issued without judicial process. The chair and author emphasized that the bill only allows consideration of MPOs and does not require civilian enforcement of them. The bill passed out on a vote, though it remained on call for additional members. The committee also heard SB 937 by Senator Gonzalez, restricting flashbang use for crowd control and banning flashbangs and explosive breaching charges in immigration enforcement, and SB 1022, creating a statewide anti-trafficking task force. SB 937 drew support from civil rights and community groups and opposition from police and sheriffs over the use-of-force standard and limits on tactics; it passed out on a vote but remained on call. SB 1022 was supported by survivor and faith groups and opposed by public defenders and sex worker advocates who raised concerns about racial disparities and enforcement harms; it also passed out on a vote. Later, SB 1395, extending criminal protective orders for certain felony sex offenses against minors up to 20 years, and SB 1230, increasing penalties for repeat illegal dumping, were both heard with mixed testimony and were held on call after committee votes. The committee also adopted a consent calendar and several bills were moved forward with amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have six members present and a quorum. Thank you so much.
• We have six members present and a quorum. Thank you so much.
• Chair and members.
• Chair, members.
• Assembly Member de Mayo, would you like to close, please?

Summary: The Assembly Higher Education Committee heard AB 2551 by Assemblymember Sade Elhawary, which would require the California State University system to hold a student hearing on time, place, and manner (TPM) policies and to collect and report demographic data on TPM violations and related discipline. The author and student witnesses argued the bill would increase transparency, reveal disproportionate enforcement, and give students a voice, citing examples of students facing investigations, holds on records, and other consequences after campus protests. Supporters included the California Faculty Association, CAIR-California, and ACLU California Action. The University of California opposed the bill, raising privacy concerns that disaggregated reporting could make it easier to identify individual students, especially in small categories. Committee members debated whether the bill was too prescriptive, whether it could create federal privacy issues, and whether the reporting should include additional categories such as political viewpoint. The author said the bill had been narrowed, including removal of a sunset provision, and emphasized that the goal was to understand and address possible disproportionate enforcement while balancing student safety and free speech. After discussion, the committee voted to concur in Senate amendments and pass AB 2551 to the floor. The roll call ultimately showed 8 ayes, 1 no, and 1 not voting. The chair then announced the committee’s final meeting of the year was adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It creates a new section of statutes. sort of site visits that conducted sort of site visits that conducted
• And it also directs the commissioner to conduct certain site visits.
• And it also directs the commissioner to conduct certain site visits.
• Thank you, Chair and members of the committee.
• </c> from members. from members.

Transcript Highlights:

• Go ahead, Madam Chair, members.
• Madam Chair, members, HB 2870...
• It just said member one or member two or something.
• Sorry, Madam Chair, members.
• Conduct.

Bills: HB2244 , HB2364 , HB2573 , HB2749 , HB2862 , HB2870 , HB4117 , HCR2004

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Elections

Keywords: evictions, judgment satisfaction, tenant rights, landlord obligations, court procedures, abortion-inducing drugs, medical abortion, pharmaceutical regulation, felonies, state law, DUI, ignition interlock, substance abuse treatment, driving privileges, alcohol education, felony conviction, misdemeanor designation, court judgment, criminal justice reform, rehabilitation

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair and members.
• Chair, members.
• Chair and members.

Committee: House Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• I will not permit conduct that disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of today's
• I will not permit conduct that disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of today's
• Chair and members.
• Chair and members, Mr. Vice Chair.
• I'm just going to make this call for Assembly Member Sharp Collins and Assembly Member Haney.

Summary: The Assembly Public Safety Committee heard several bills dealing with firearms, hit-and-run penalties, domestic violence, and sexually violent predator placement. AB 256 by Assemblymember DeMaio would add a one-year enhancement for certain firearm felonies involving controlled substances and require toxicology testing; supporters said it would provide transparency about the causes of gun violence, while opponents argued it duplicated existing law, was overbroad, and raised privacy concerns. AB 1281, also by DeMaio, would increase penalties for hit-and-run cases involving death or serious injury; supporters framed it as a response to a fatal case in the author’s district, while opponents said current law already provides strong penalties and the bill would remove judicial flexibility. Both bills drew no formal support beyond the author and were opposed by public defenders, civil liberties groups, and other advocates. AB 292 by Assemblymember Patterson, as amended, would increase punishment for repeat felony domestic violence offenders, including higher prison terms and a longer mandatory jail minimum for probationers with prior domestic violence convictions. The author and a survivor witness argued that early release can endanger victims and children, and the California State Sheriffs’ Association and California District Attorneys Association supported the measure. Opponents, including public defenders and advocacy groups, said existing law already escalates penalties, warned the bill could sweep too broadly or reduce flexibility, and urged more prevention-oriented responses. After discussion, the committee approved AB 292 as amended and sent it to Appropriations. AB 767 by Assemblymember Alanis would clarify that private and home-based schools, as well as daycare facilities, are covered by existing restrictions on conditional release placements for sexually violent predators. Supporters said the bill would better protect children and resolve inconsistent court interpretations, while opponents argued it could effectively bar placement in large parts of the state and undermine rehabilitation and due process. The committee passed AB 767 to Appropriations. The committee also approved the consent item AB 277. AB 1092, a vote-only reconsideration item from the prior year, was brought up without the author present and was defeated. Final reported outcomes were: AB 256 failed, AB 277 passed, AB 292 passed, AB 767 passed, AB 1281 failed, and AB 1092 failed.

Transcript Highlights:

• No engaging in conduct that disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of this hearing
• No engaging in conduct that disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of this hearing
• Good afternoon, Chair, Chair, members.
• Good afternoon, Madam Chair and members.
• Members, AB 2790 has passed, and we'll leave the roll open so that members can add their votes.

Summary: The Assembly Communications and Conveyance Committee met with Chair Tasha Berner presiding and reviewed one item, AB 2790, a committee bill concerning the California Teleconnect Fund. The chair opened with extensive ground rules on orderly conduct and public comment, then the committee secretary called the roll and established a quorum. The bill was described as updating eligibility and administrative procedures for the CTF, clarifying treatment of non-instructional facilities, and revising how applicants coordinate CTF applications with the federal E-Rate program. Supporters said the measure responds to concerns raised in a prior oversight hearing about CPUC rulemaking that could make the program harder for schools and other eligible entities to use. Kim Lewis of CENIC said the bill would preserve continuity, stability, and fairness for broadband support to educational and research institutions, while Christina DeCaro of the California Library Association and Kimberly Rosenberger on behalf of Superintendent Tony Thurmond also voiced support. No opposition testimony was presented. The committee then voted to pass AB 2790 and refer it to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. The roll was left open briefly for additional votes, and the bill ultimately passed 9-0 before the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• [Music] The Minnesota Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct,
• Uh, members, the parties to this complaint have presented the complaint and the response to the complaint
• So, um if a member to add something.
• We're on 56.1 and 56.3, which state members must adhere to the highest standard of ethical conduct as
• And 56.3: improper conduct includes conduct that violates a rule or administrative policy of the Senate

Committee: Senate Rules and Administration - Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct