Video & Transcript Research : 'January 12'

Page 19 of 500
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, February 12, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • :12:04.760> down<00:12:05.000> churches<00:12:05.399> and<00:12:05.600> small
  • 12:35.839> on<00:12:36.360> to<00:12:36.560> uncover<00:12:37.160> waste<
  • > made<00:12:41.160> by<00:12:41.320> him<00:12:41.480> and<00:12:41.639>
  • :42.880> public<00:12:43.279> eye<00:12:43.880> as<00:12:44.000> an<00:12
  • about<00:12:49.680> the<00:12:49.800> fear<00:12:50.040> of<00:12:50.160
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Education Committee, February 27, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:12:05.280> So,<01:12:05.520> I<01:12:05.760> don't<01:12:06.000> I
  • 12:07.040> the<01:12:07.199> bill<01:12:07.360> at<01:12:07.520> all.
  • I think<01:12:08.000> that's<01:12:08.239> just<01:12:08.560> that<01:12:08.800>
  • I think the bill<01:12:38.960> will<01:12:39.199> be<01:12:39.360> mostly<01:12:
  • Okay,<01:12:43.120> let's<01:12:43.440> finish<01:12:43.679> this<01:12:43.920><
Bills: HB0159
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Education Committee, February 27, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:12:10.079> Senator<00:12:10.399> Rafa<00:12:10.800> should<00:12:11.040>
  • 12:15.680> both<00:12:16.000> of<00:12:16.079> the<00:12:16.240> chairman
  • of the chairman of the select<00:12:17.360> committee<00:12:17.600> on<00:12:17.680>
  • finance reccalibration<00:12:18.880> are<00:12:19.279> involved<00:12:19.600> in
  • <00:12:23.440> house<00:12:23.680> bill<00:12:23.839> one<00:12:24.000> and
Bills: HB0159
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 2/25/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um that tax<00:12:01.600> credit<00:12:02.079> uh<00:12:02.160> is<00:12:02.399>
  • So it<00:12:03.920> increases<00:12:04.399> the<00:12:04.880> uh<00:12:05.040>
  • <00:12:07.040> it<00:12:07.200> for<00:12:07.360> inflation<00:12:08.160> and
  • ,<00:12:21.040> it<00:12:21.279> would<00:12:21.440> reduce<00:12:21.839>
  • uh under OB<00:12:31.680> a<00:12:31.839> 50%<00:12:32.399> tax<00:12:32.639>
Bills: HR1, HF387
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • , a school district<00:12:03.040> uh<00:12:03.360> needed<00:12:03.680> to<00:12
  • /c><00:12:09.920> we<00:12:10.079> do<00:12:10.240> that<00:12:10.399> at
  • move<00:12:14.480> and<00:12:15.440> made<00:12:15.760> some<00:12:16.000><
  • >> So,<00:12:32.720> there<00:12:32.880> is<00:12:33.040> no<00:12:33.200>
  • >> I<00:12:37.440> mean,<00:12:37.600> we<00:12:37.760> do<00:12:37.920>
Summary: The committee heard testimony from Michael McCurley, president of Zo Education and a senior vice president with Zo Group, about the company’s role in providing broadband and managed network services to Kentucky schools. He said Zo Education serves all Kentucky K-12 public school districts in partnership with the Kentucky Department of Education, offering more bandwidth at lower cost than the prior provider and also providing cybersecurity and network protection. He emphasized that reliable connectivity is essential for instruction, testing, remote coursework, and school administration. McCurley also addressed the ongoing contract dispute involving the Kentucky Communications Network Authority and Open Fiber Silicom, saying Zo Education is not a party to the litigation but is concerned about possible disruption to schools and students. In response to committee questions, he said the company incurred unexpected costs when it had to reroute connections and build alternate network paths, including one school move that cost more than $50,000 to serve a site generating under $2,000 per month. He said outages and incidents are more frequent when Kentucky Wired access is unavailable, and that Zo could not have bid at its current price without access to Kentucky Wired. Committee members discussed the broader implications of the dispute and the state’s broadband structure. Senator Williams said the committee’s priority is avoiding disruption to students and noted concerns about infrastructure purchases and upgrades tied to the network, saying he had not seen clear contractual support for some of the expenditures. He also referenced a future audit and said the committee should preserve options and taxpayer funds. The committee then reviewed its report to LRC, including changes related to infrastructure purchases and water asset management technology, and agreed to submit the report without a committee vote. The chair announced the next meeting would be in January, with no December meeting scheduled, and the committee adjourned.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh I'd<03:12:04.399> ask<03:12:04.560> for<03:12:04.720> a<03:12:04.880> vote
  • <03:12:05.040> at<03:12:05.200> this<03:12:05.359> time<03:12:05.920> uh<
  • <03:12:10.960> I<03:12:11.439> speak<03:12:12.080> I'll<03:12:12.319> let
  • I speak I'll let it<03:12:12.720> show<03:12:12.960> that<03:12:13.439> uh<03:12
  • <03:12:50.640> So<03:12:51.279> I<03:12:51.600> that's<03:12:51.920> why<
Summary: The committee of conference first took up House Bill 421FN, concerning notice of tax-exempt status filing procedures by town officials. Members reviewed the Senate changes and focused on whether the amended language would require multiple mailings to charitable organizations. House conferees said the Senate wording appeared to create more than one mailing and asked for clarification; Senate members explained the intent was to reduce clerk workload by posting forms and sending a follow-up notice only to organizations that failed to file after the deadline. After a brief caucus, the House concluded there were too many unresolved changes to work out in conference and moved to non-concur with the Senate amendment. The House motion to non-concur passed unanimously, 4-0, and the committee agreed to place the conference report on the House consent calendar. The chair then closed the committee of conference on House Bill 421FN. The transcript then shifted to a separate committee of conference on another bill, where members discussed revisions involving direct supervision at an eligible facility, federalwide assurance requirements, and immunity language. Testimony focused on whether the bill should require supervision at a specific facility or allow broader supervision arrangements, whether rulemaking should define direct supervision, and whether the immunity provision should cover reckless as well as willful misconduct. No final vote or action on that second bill was reached in the portion provided.