Video & Transcript Research : 'Conference Notices:'

Page 19 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 12th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • or video conference call.
  • So, is that really noticed? Is that really transparency? I believe people are well.
  • But let's give reasonable notice, and that's all we're asking for, notice and transparency.
  • Notice and transparency, that's not this bill.
  • An individual can request a hearing after the notice has been provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 12th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've noticed that trend with several bills and several committees. the building.
  • where it's a reasonable... quality that would be considered good enough to provide the public. with notice
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 57 (4-1-26) - Part 2

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Keywords: In an effort to stave off issues that may occur with long format live streams, we have split this stream into two parts. Video Start 00:00:00 Reconvene 00:50:47 Enrollment 00:52:35 Senate Message 00:54:20 Orders of the Day 00:55:05 HCR 67 00:55:41 SB 110 00:56:58 HB 568 00:58:35 HB 501 00:59:58 HB 502 01:03:25 HJR 75 01:09:17 HJR 76 01:13:30 HB 757 01:16:06 SB 198 01:18:25 HB 422 01:21:05 Appointment of Conference Committees 01:24:59 SB 189 01:25:59 SB 110 & SB 110 CCR 01:36:30 SB 110 FCCR 01:39:48 SB 100 FCCR 01:43:15 SB 27 01:48:41 SB 1 01:52:40 HB 619 01:59:50 Senate Message 02:02:04 HB 2 02:05:04 HB 503 CCR/FCCR 02:06:30 Enrollment 02:10:53 HB 500 CCR/FCCR 02:11:30 Enrollment 03:20:10 Recess 03:22:40 Reconvene 04:58:29 Senate Message 04:59:29 Appointment of Conference Committees 05:00:39 Orders of the Day continued 05:01:47 SB 50 05:02:28 Enrollment 05:13:00 HB 67 CCR/FCCR 05:15:00 SB 10 05:19:50 SB 4 CCR/FCCR 05:23:42 HB 504 CCR/FCCR 05:33:31 SJR 139 05:38:20 HB 776 05:55:05 SB 77 05:58:55 SB 30 06:04:50 SB 149 06:14:08 Recess 06:16:41 Reconvene 06:41:12 Senate Message 06:42:28 Orders of the Day 06:43:23 Enrollment 06:43:42 SB 249 06:45:14 HB 762 06:47:27 HB 10 CCR/FCCR 06:50:40 HB 490 06:54:22 HB 257 CCR/FCCR 06:57:00 Enrollment 07:00:22 HB 677 07:00:58 HB 2 CCR/FCCR 07:05:05 Senate Message 07:18:08 HB 900 CCR/FCCR 07:18:34 Citations/Resolutions 07:23:40 Enrollment 07:29:41 Recess 07:30:09 Reconvene 07:59:10 Senate Message 07:59:20 HB 619 CCR/FCCR 07:59:53 Enrollment 08:03:30 SCR 9 08:05:25 SB 8 08:09:05 Enrollment 08:12:38 Senate Message 08:13:47 HB 757 CCR/FCCR 08:15:18 Enrollment 08:21:25 HB 904 08:23:47 Senate Message 08:37:37 HB 568 CCR/FCCR 08:38:18 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 08:43:20 Recess 08:53:09 Reconvene/Enrollment 09:11:48 Recess 09:12:43 Reconvene for Day 58 09:33:45 Enrollment 09:34:46 Adjournment 09:39:58, 958, all
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Committee on Technology - February 4, 2020 - Decision Making

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS0VbQIk5fQ, 2026-07-02T01:22:43+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Scheduled for February 4, 2020: Ke Kōmike ‘Enehana COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY Kenekoa/Senator Jarrett Keohokalole, Luna Ho‘omalu/Chair Kenekoa/Senator J. Kalani English, Hope Luna Ho‘omalu/Vice Chair Ke Kōmike Hana Aupuni COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Kenekoa/Senator Laura H. Thielen, Luna Ho‘omalu/Chair Kenekoa/Senator Lorraine R. Inouye, Hope Luna Ho‘omalu/Vice Chair ‘Ōlelo Ho‘olaha No Ka ‘Aha Ho‘olohe NOTICE OF HEARING Lā / DATE: Pō‘alua,Pepeluali 4, 2020 / Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Hola / TIME: 3:45 p.m. Wahi / PLACE: Lumi ‘Aha Kūkā 225 / Conference Room 225 Ke Kapikala Moku‘āina / State Capitol 415 South Beretania Street Papa Kumuhana A G E N D A SB 3031 RELATING TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Requires the department of accounting and general services and the department of budget and finance, in consultation with the office of enterprise technology services, to develop and implement a uniform financial database, with parameters, benefits, and features that are compatible to the software system currently being implemented by the office of enterprise technology services at other agencies for use by all state agencies. Appropriates funds. TEC/GVO, WAM No Ka ‘Ike ‘Ē A‘e, E Kelepona Aku I Ke Kākau ‘Ōlelo Kōmike Ma (808) 587-7217. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL THE COMMITTEE CLERK AT (808) 587-7217., 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
HI
Summary: The House Housing Committee opened its Friday morning hearing by noting potentially catastrophic flooding on the island and acknowledging that some members were absent helping their communities, so quorum for voting was uncertain. The committee then heard testimony on several housing-related measures, with most bills drawing support from housing agencies and community organizations and little or no opposition in the room. On SB 2069 SD2, SB 2177 SD2, and SB 2342 SD2, witnesses largely supported the measures. HHFDC supported SB 2069 and SB 2177, and HPHA supported SB 2342. For SB 2342, HHFDC raised concerns that the bill would alter the Qualified Allocation Plan outside the normal open, public process required by federal law and could exclude stakeholders; Kathy Charities echoed those concerns and also objected to changing point allocations in ways that could raise rents and weaken long-term affordability. Members questioned HHFDC about how the QAP is normally updated, the meaning of the point system, and whether a legislative working group could mandate changes; HHFDC said recommendations would still need public hearing and board approval. The committee also heard SB 2060 SD2, which would create a mixed-income subaccount in the rental housing revolving fund. HHFDC said the subaccount would likely use tier-two funds, estimated at about $100 million total, to support mixed-income projects above 60% AMI, citing Front Street Apartments as a possible example. Members asked about project selection and funding needs. On SB 2544 SD2, OHA opposed the bill’s Chapter 6E-related exemptions and mandatory review timelines, arguing that burial review protections should not be weakened and that the SPEED Task Force process was a better venue for streamlining. The sponsor later clarified that the bill was not meant to eliminate the 60-day review process but to make the deadline clearer. For SB 3011 SD1, which concerns public housing and pet ownership, HPHA and several humane organizations supported the measure, saying it would help low-income residents and seniors keep pets and benefit from animal companionship. HPHA explained its existing pet policy, including deposits, monthly fees, and restrictions, and said the requested funding would support ADA-accessible pet areas and related administration. Finally, on SB 2061 SD2, HCDA supported the bill while OHA opposed it unless protections for Hawaiian Crown and Government lands were strengthened. Committee members questioned the project’s 60/40 split between income-restricted and market-rate units, the 10-year owner-occupancy restriction, and the procurement exemption; the sponsor said the exemption was tied to a real estate transaction and that the project would still use 103D-like solicitation procedures. No votes were taken during the hearing, and several items were left for later action because quorum was uncertain.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are on our 9:00 a.m. agenda in Conference Room 430, and it is currently 9:02 a.m.
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2611, which would prohibit algorithmic price-setting in Hawaii’s rental market, require public education by the Attorney General, and establish fines and penalties. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying its language was too unclear and could expose landlords and agents to criminal and civil liability for ordinary rent-setting practices based on public information or assistance from property professionals. Members asked about antitrust standards, tacit agreement, and whether using county-published affordable-rent schedules would be unlawful; the AG said that would not be unlawful if based on public information and without collusion. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting support from the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Realtors with comments, 50501 Hawaii and General Strike Hawaii, Haloha Project, 13 individuals, and one opponent. The committee then heard HB 2102, which clarifies that residential projects involving ground disturbance in high-risk areas remain subject to state historic preservation review and removes an exemption for lands presumed nominally sensitive. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and the Department of Planning and Permitting supported the measure, saying it would improve clarity and ensure review focuses on projects most likely to affect historic properties or iwi kupuna, while also urging language refinements to better define sensitive sandy-soil areas and balance preservation with housing timelines. NAP Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing it would undo progress made last session and that the current process already includes protections for inadvertent discoveries and efficiency for lower-risk areas. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs strongly supported HB 2102, explaining it was responding to beneficiary complaints about late-added language in last year’s law and saying the nominally sensitive-area language should be removed because it was adopted without sufficient stakeholder input and could be harmful to iwi kupuna protections. Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and several individuals also supported the bill. Committee discussion focused on how “nominally sensitive” areas are determined, whether project proponents could self-certify areas as exempt, and how high-density residential projects should be treated; SHPD said it uses survey and monitoring data to map sensitivity, that highly sensitive areas like Kīauea are not nominally sensitive, and that some high-density projects should remain exempt if they do not involve new ground disturbance. The hearing included no final vote in the portion provided, but the chair noted 48 individuals in support and continued questioning on the bill’s definitions and implementation.