Video & Transcript Research : 'voting'

Page 199 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 1st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • process, but she was excited about voting.
  • "Let me, let me vote on my own." She said, "No, you already voted."
  • That is a literal voter whose vote was taken from her.
  • I would hope that you reconsider your vote and join me in voting against the bill that has absolutely
  • Not suppression of the vote or dilution of our vote, or the villainizing of our vote.
Bills: SB5, SB11, SB12, SB5, SB11, SB12
DE
Transcript Highlights:
  • Not voting to no. Mr. Spiegelman from not voting to voting no.
  • Voice vote. Office's mission without increasing cost. Voice vote.
  • Collins, from not voting to voting no.
  • Representative Phillips: Voting yes. Ms. Phillips from absent to voting yes.
  • Representative Phillips: Voting yes. Ms. Phillips from absent to voting yes.
Keywords: 1064, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Insurance Committee Apr 22nd, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's what we're voting on.
  • Chair voting aye. Vice Chair voting no. Senators Jones? Jones, no. Rubio? Aye.
  • Chair and Vice Chair both voting aye. Senators Jones? Not voting. Rubio? Aye.
  • Chair voting aye. Vice Chair voting no. Senators Rubio? The ayes are 3. The noes are 2.
  • SB 878, Perez, the committee assistant will report the vote. Current vote is 4 to 2.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Not voting. Sharp-Collins not voting.
  • And for that, with that, I'll be a recommended aye vote today. I'll be voting aye as well.
  • Vote change AB 90: Jackson from not voting to aye. Thank you. Voting to aye.
  • Burner: not voting to aye.
  • One no vote. Thank you so much. Bill's out. Keep it a call. One no vote. Thank you so much.
Summary: The committee first adopted its 2025-26 rules on a 7-0 roll call, then approved three consent items—AB 88, AB 240, and AB 313—on a due-pass motion to Appropriations. The hearing then moved to AB 648, which would give community college districts the same zoning authority as the UC and CSU systems to build student and staff housing on property they own or lease. The author and supporters argued the bill would help address severe housing insecurity and homelessness among community college students, while opponents and some members raised concerns about local control, zoning exemptions, and the impact on nearby communities. AB 648 passed the committee on a 5-2 vote and was sent to the Local Government Committee. The committee next heard AB 466, which would require California Community Colleges and CSU campuses to provide organ and tissue donor registry information during student orientation, and request UC campuses to do the same. Supporters shared personal stories about transplants and donation, saying college orientation is a good opportunity to increase registrations. Some members worried about information overload during orientation and suggested campuses have flexibility in how they present the material, but the bill advanced on a unanimous 7-0 vote to Appropriations. AB 326 followed, proposing campus-by-campus external audits of the CSU every three years and public release of the audits. The author, faculty supporters, and a student argued that systemwide audits do not provide enough transparency about how money is spent at individual campuses, citing examples of financial mismanagement and fee increases. CSU opposed the bill, saying it already conducts annual consolidated external audits and that campus-level audits would add cost without added benefit. After extensive discussion about transparency, audit scope, and implementation, the bill passed 6-1 to Appropriations. The committee then took up AB 335, which would create a California Black-Serving Institution Grant Program to support Black student success and broader underserved student services; supporters emphasized persistent equity gaps and low completion rates, while an opponent argued the bill needed to be carefully amended to comply with Proposition 209 and equal protection requirements. The transcript ends during that item’s discussion, before a final vote is shown.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair Elliott: So, with 19 yes votes, zero no votes, and zero pass votes, House Bill 38 is amended by
  • <00:54:26.440> guest votes sure go ahead I'm voting guest votes sure go ahead I'm voting guest
  • Representative Nemes voted yes. Representative Petrie requested to explain his vote.
  • Representative Roberts voted yes. Representative Stevenson voted yes.
  • Representative Whitaker voted yes. Representative Williams voted yes.
Summary: The committee began with roll call and introductory remarks, including recognition of new members and guests. It then took up House Bill 38, sponsored by Representative Tipton, which would increase penalties for repeated violations of an order of protection. Under the committee substitute, a third violation involving the same order and same individual could be elevated from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class D felony. Tipton and domestic violence survivor Maryanne Pratt testified in support, with Pratt describing repeated abuse, protective-order violations, and ongoing fear despite arrests and jail time. Several members spoke in favor of the bill and praised Pratt’s testimony. Members and outside witnesses raised concerns about the substitute’s language, especially the requirement that the same victim be involved and whether the bill could leave gaps for repeat abusers with different victims. Representative Burke and others questioned whether the conduct was already covered by stalking or assault statutes. Scott West, speaking for the Kentucky Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, argued that the bill could allow technical contempt findings to be used as predicate offenses and noted that existing assault and stalking laws already address much of the conduct. Sponsor Tipton said the language was not final and that further changes might be considered in the Senate. Despite the concerns, the committee adopted the substitute and passed HB 38 with favorable expression by a 19-0 vote. The committee then heard House Bill 206, sponsored by Representative Nemes, on wrongful conviction compensation. Nemes introduced exonerees and representatives from the Kentucky Innocence Project, and the substitute was adopted without objection. Testimony came from Paul Herd, who spent 20 years wrongfully convicted and described the difficulty of reentry, and Jon Acar, who said he was wrongly convicted as a teenager and spent years in custody and on parole. Both urged passage of the bill as overdue support for people exonerated after wrongful convictions.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Jun 16th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I’ll vote for it today. Thank you.
  • I respectfully urge a yes vote on SB 1364.
  • I respectfully urge a yes vote on SB 1364.
  • We respectfully urge a no vote. Thank you. No vote, thank you. Thank you.
  • Dixon, not voting, too. This is SB 1371, Durazo. Dixon, not voting, too. Okay.
Summary: The committee heard several bills. SB 911, by Senator Becker, would require notification and verification of defensible-space compliance when homes in high wildfire severity zones are transferred, using the preliminary change of ownership report; supporters said it would improve wildfire resilience and insurance availability, while county assessors opposed the use of the PCOR and urged a different recorded document. Members generally supported the bill but raised concerns about the 12-month compliance window and the need to keep working with assessors; the bill was held pending a quorum and later placed on call. SB 1016, by Senator Blakespear, would create a pathway for a higher-level mental health evaluation when a Care Court petition is dismissed because the person is too ill to participate or otherwise needs more intensive care. Supporters, including psychiatrists, family members, and local officials, said Care Court is leaving many severely ill people untreated and that the bill would connect them to existing LPS processes. Opponents, including Disability Rights California, county behavioral health directors, counties, and other advocacy groups, argued it would expand involuntary detention, bypass existing pre-petition screening safeguards, and undermine Care Court’s voluntary nature. The bill passed the committee on a roll call vote and was placed on call. SB 1112, by Senator Archuleta, would create a faster court process for victims of illegal or excessive “bandit towing” to recover their vehicles by posting a bond and obtaining a release certificate. Support came from Enterprise Mobility and the author, who said the bill targets bad actors and helps equalize leverage for vehicle owners; the California Auto Body Association sought an amendment to exclude auto repair shops. The committee passed the bill as amended to Appropriations and placed it on call. SB 1119, by Senator Padilla, would impose child-safety requirements on AI chatbots, including risk assessments, crisis-response protocols, parental controls, limits on time and data use, reporting, audits, and a private right of action. The bill was driven by testimony from the mother of a teenager who died by suicide after prolonged chatbot interactions; industry and business groups opposed or sought amendments, citing overlap with recent law, vague standards, and prescriptive design mandates. Members expressed strong support for the bill’s goals while urging tighter definitions, and the bill was moved on a roll call vote and placed on call.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

GVO Public Hearing 03-18-2025

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Vice Chair: 412 HD1 SD1, I vote yes. Chair votes. Vice Chair votes. Senator Mori votes.
  • Yes chair votes chair votes I Vice chair Yes chair votes chair votes I Vice chair votes<00:45:42.640>
  • If not, 1297 HD1 SD1, I vote yes. Call the members present. Any no votes or reservations?
  • If not, Vice Chair, as is, I vote yes. By the way, on HB 1187 HD1, as is, Chair votes.
  • If not, Vice Chair, HB 987 HD1 SD1, I vote yes. Are there any no votes or reservations?
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 412 HD1, which would expand the definition of lobbying to include certain communications with high-level officials about procurement decisions and create presumptions regarding lobbying on behalf of private clients. The State Ethics Commission and State Procurement Office supported the measure, saying it would improve transparency and align Hawaii with other states, while the Hawaii Primary Care Association opposed it over concerns that employers and others could be swept in too broadly. No public testimony or questions led to any action on the bill during the hearing. The committee then took up House Bill 131, which would allow agencies to disclose government records to researchers for certain research purposes and clarify the Office of Information Practices’ rulemaking authority. OIP and the Public First Law Center supported the bill, arguing it would create uniform standards and that concerns could be handled through rules. The University of Hawaiʻi system, DBEDT, DHS, DLNR, and others raised concerns about the breadth of the terms “research” and “researcher,” privacy, confidential information, and possible misuse; Hawaiian Electric also warned about access to sensitive infrastructure information. Members questioned whether the bill was premature and whether definitions should be narrowed in statute, and OIP said it would consider working with agencies and the University on clearer definitions. House Bill 792 HD1, relating to the Office of the Legislative Analyst, drew no testimony beyond a late written support from the Hawaii Children’s Action Network, and the committee moved on without discussion. The committee then heard House Bill 1424, which would restrict transfers between appropriated funds for positions and operating expenses. Budget and Finance explained that current practice allows transfers from payroll to other current expenses when there are savings, but legislative appropriations for specific purposes must still be spent for that purpose. Several agencies expressed opposition or concerns, saying the bill could reduce flexibility, especially in response to federal funding changes or vacant positions, though members emphasized transparency and accountability. Budget and Finance suggested a reporting approach instead, and the committee discussed quarterly reporting as a possible alternative. Finally, the committee began House Bill 1153 HD1, which concerns funding adjustments for state programs and capital improvement projects and establishes a protocol fund. Budget and Finance, DAGS, and the State Procurement Office supported the measure, while the General Contractors Association and several construction-related groups opposed section two, arguing it would undo recent procurement protest-bond safeguards adopted in Act 162. The hearing then moved on toward House Bill 1297, but the transcript cuts off before that bill was fully discussed.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Session (02/13/2025)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • surveillance or monitoring others voting surveillance or monitoring others voting behavior<01:33
  • Speech inside the polling place is your vote.
  • of voting you're allowed to wear of voting you're allowed to wear whatever<01:35:34.960> shirt
  • <01:35:38.719> ex long as you're in the act of voting ex long as you're in the act of voting
  • I did vote to pass this in committee.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Veteran and Military Affairs REVISED: Links added Feb 5th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Veteran and Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Cirk, could you open a cue for a vote? Anybody want to change their vote? And is there any debate?
  • Clerk, could you open the queue for voting, please? You might want to change the vote.
  • Clerk, did you open the queue for voting? Anybody want to change your vote?
  • Clerk, could you open the queue for a registered vote, please? Body want to change your votes?
  • OK, now could we open up the For a vote, anybody want to change your Vote? OK, saying no.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Jan 9th, 2025

California Assembly Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I respectfully request an aye vote.
  • All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote who desire to vote.
  • All those vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll. 59 co-authors added.
  • All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote who desire to vote.
  • All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

LBT Public Hearing 04-13-2026

Labor and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • If not, uh, Madam Vice Chair Lamosao for the vote. Chair votes aye.
  • For GM the vote. Chair votes aye. Okay.
  • Chair votes aye. advise and consent. Chair votes aye.
  • If not, Vice Chair Lamosao for the vote. Chair votes aye.
  • Lamasao for the vote. Chair, vote aye. Lamasao for the vote. Chair, vote aye.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee heard and acted on several gubernatorial nominations to the Hawaii Workforce Development Council and one nomination to the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board. For GM 779, Mark Fong Su Wat said he would bring his experience as an electrician and labor community member to workforce development, and he committed to serving if confirmed. Testimony was unanimously supportive, with 10 in support and none opposed, and the committee voted to recommend advise and consent; the recommendation was adopted. For GM 792, Sheryl Cross sought a second term on the Workforce Development Council and described her work on employer engagement, military veteran affairs, and military spouse employment. In response to questions, she emphasized the need to better connect military spouses, underrepresented workers, and students pursuing trades or non-college pathways to jobs, including through school academies and online hiring initiatives. The item was held for later decision-making. For GM 793, Ashley Lohua, also nominated to the Workforce Development Council, said her focus would be helping people stay in Hawaii by improving job retention, listening to community concerns, and building pathways between sectors. Support testimony highlighted her work with marginalized communities and her empathy and leadership. She told the committee she would use her nonprofit and HR experience to help address vacancies and workforce barriers; the item was also held for later decision-making. For GM 774, Douglas Thomas Moore, nominated to the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board, said his first priority would be reducing the backlog. He proposed using informal conferences and mediation to speed workers’ compensation appeals and suggested recruiting more practitioners, especially younger ones, into the field. The committee noted 11 supportive testimonies and no opposition; no vote was taken in the portion provided.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

House Chamber - Fri Apr 11, 2025, 12:00PM HST - Day 49

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Perrick, no vote. 2047. Representative Perrick, no vote.
  • Representative Pirick, no vote. So 2049. Representative Pirick, no vote.
  • Representative Muroka, no vote. So 2051. Representative Muroka, no vote.
  • No vote. ordered. Representative Purick. No vote. So<00:22:06.799> ordered.
  • No<00:35:32.480> vote.<00:35:33.040> So No vote. So No vote.
Keywords: 910, house, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 35 (2-26-26) - Reupload

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Have all those voted who intend to vote?
  • Roll call is open for your rules vote I. Roll call is open for your vote.
  • votes?
  • Twenty members voting I.
  • And a roll call machine is open for your voting. >> Have all members voted?
Summary: The House convened with 97 members present, declared a quorum, approved excusing absent members, and suspended the rules to allow co-sponsorships and vote modifications. The journal for February 25, 2026 was approved. The clerk also reported that the Senate had passed Senate Bills 98 and 122 and requested concurrence. The House then received second-reading reports on a range of bills, including measures on prison educational programs, respiratory care, dietitians, wildlife depredation, temporary structures, military families, civil rights, local boards of education, light pollution, controlled-substance prescribing licenses, youth health services, class sizes for exceptional children, the athletic trainer compact, limited commercial driver’s licenses, and Senate Bill 145 relating to the Department of Agriculture and Alcohol Beverage Control. Committee reports moved several bills forward, including the main budget bills House Bill 500 and House Bill 504, along with measures on workforce investment, data centers, domestic violence, guardians ad litem, domestic relations, health delivery and “food is medicine” initiatives, state personnel, open records, and fish and wildlife resources. House Bill 500 and House Bill 504 were taken from the Rules Committee and placed on the orders of the day. House Bill 500, the executive branch budget bill, was then taken up for third reading and explanation. Members presented extensive floor explanations of House Bill 500 and House Committee Substitute 1, describing it as a “good first draft” of the executive budget. Supporters said the proposal emphasizes restrained spending growth, base reductions with exemptions for key areas, employee salary increments, and deposits to the Budget Reserve Trust Fund for future one-time investments. They highlighted funding for K-12 education, postsecondary aid and workforce training, Medicaid and behavioral health, public health infrastructure, pensions, veterans, public safety, economic development, tourism, and state technology and facility maintenance. The budget substitute was adopted by voice vote, and the discussion continued with detailed descriptions of the bill’s provisions; no final passage vote was shown in the excerpt.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Rules Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Four votes. All right, that has four votes.
  • Four votes. All right, that item has four votes.
  • Four votes. All right, that is four votes. We will leave that open for absent members to add on.
  • Four votes. All right, that is four votes. We'll leave that open for absent members to add on.
  • Four votes. All right, you have four votes. Congratulations.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado Senate 2026 Legislative Day 036 Feb 19th, 2026

Colorado Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are there any no votes?
  • With<00:35:26.359> a<00:35:26.400> vote<00:35:26.760> of With a vote of With a vote
  • Are there any no votes?
  • Are there any<00:39:13.160> no<00:39:13.359> votes? any no votes? any no votes?
  • Are there any no votes?
Keywords: 981, all
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • And we will be voting after the conclusion of all testimony and then we will be voting on each well will
  • be voting to as a block on certain ones.
  • Hell no by your vote.
  • Yes, we do have the votes.
  • Aye votes and, yes, do any other senators have votes they need to have recorded and the recording?
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House DFL Media Availability 6/9/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • You were the only Democrat to vote for it. How do you assess that vote?
  • I know that people will be hurt by that vote.
  • And people will be hurt by that vote.
  • understand why you made that vote. understand why you made that vote.
  • read the bills that we voted on today? read the bills that we voted on today?
Keywords: 1183, house
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Education Apr 2nd, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hearing none, let's open the vote. Votes open. Everyone's voted. Anyone want to change your vote?
  • With that, we'll close the vote. Six ayes, zero nays, zero not voting. The amendment is passed.
  • With that, we'll open the vote on House Bill 1247 as amended. Votes open. Everyone's voted.
  • Everyone's voted. Anyone want to change your vote? With that, we'll close the vote.
  • Six ayes, zero nays, zero not voting. Thank you. Six ayes, zero nays, zero not voting.
Keywords: 908, all
Summary: The Senate Education Committee reconvened to address House Bill 1247, relating to protection of a student who is a victim of sexual assault. Senator Axtman explained that a proposed amendment to extend suspension time in rare cases where a case remains active was not adopted because it could conflict with providing adequate educational access, and the committee agreed not to amend that provision. Members then clarified a separate amendment to HB 1247 that incorporated testimony-based changes, including language addressing notice procedures for juvenile and adult cases and students who are over 18 but still enrolled in high school. The committee adopted Amendment 25.0807.02001 to HB 1247 by a 6-0 vote. Afterward, the committee passed HB 1247 as amended on a 6-0 vote, and Senator Wobbema was assigned as carrier. The committee also briefly confirmed that HB 1223 was already good to go and did not require further action. At the end of the meeting, members discussed the schedule for the following Monday and agreed to start at 10:00 a.m. The committee then adjourned.
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session, 2/3/2026 #1

Maryland Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • President, has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote? Explain their vote.
  • President, has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
  • I'm very troubled about voting this bill, but I will vote for it.
  • voting this bill but I will vote for it. voting this bill but I will vote for it.
  • Has everyone recorded their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote, explain their vote?
Summary: The Senate opened with an invocation by Reverend Dr. Patrick Claybourne of Bethl AM Church in Baltimore, introduced by the senator from the 40th district, who highlighted the church’s long history, community work, scholarships, food pantry, school partnerships, and a planned rise center. The Senate journalized the invocation and then recognized several guests, including the Bethesda Roosters U16 rugby team, which was congratulated for winning the Maryland state title and the 2025 National U16 Championship, and members of the Joint Veterans Committee of Maryland. The chamber also welcomed a Johns Hopkins Police Accountability Board appointment letter, which was referred to the Executive Nominations Committee, and later a delegation from the Ghana Parliament legislative staff visiting with the Department of Legislative Services and NCSL representatives. The main floor business centered on Senate Bill 1, which would prohibit law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings. The minority whip argued against the bill, saying it was unenforceable, an improper use of legislative time amid other state crises, and could create a system where local officers detain federal officers for a civil violation; he also said officers mask themselves because of threats and doxxing. Senators in support argued the bill was needed to address masked ICE agents, protect public safety, and respond to concerns about civil rights abuses and intimidation. After debate and vote explanations from senators, including one emphasizing immigrant heritage and another supporting the bill as a protection measure, SB 1 passed with 31 affirmative votes. The Senate then passed Senate Bill 17, an emergency bill on alcoholic beverages related event promoters permits, by unanimous affirmative vote. It next took up Senate Bill 245, an emergency bill prohibiting immigration enforcement agreements. The minority leader questioned whether the bill would eliminate formalized 287(g) agreements and replace them with county-by-county policies, arguing that this could reduce uniformity, weaken safety, and create a patchwork of local practices. The bill’s sponsor responded that counties would still be bound by constitutional and legal limits, that the agreements provide minimal training and resources, and that the state should stop formally cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The sponsor also said the bill would not increase profiling and that public safety would remain intact. The debate continued with concerns about Montgomery County’s evolving policy and the impact on smaller counties, but the transcript ends before final action on SB 245.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • green vote. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. green vote. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • Let's vote green.
  • Members, please vote. The chief clerk will call the names of the members who are voting remotely.
  • the members who are voting remotely. the members who are voting remotely.
  • <00:16:38.640> Momani Davis votes no. Davis votes no. Momani Davis votes no.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House first took up a resolution commemorating Peace Officer Memorial Day and Police Week in Minnesota. Members read a series of “whereas” clauses honoring fallen peace officers, including the addition of three names to the Minnesota Law Enforcement Memorial Honor Roll, and recognizing the service of the state’s more than 10,000 peace officers. The resolution was adopted without objection. The chamber then moved to conference committee reports and calendar actions, including a Rules and Legislative Administration report placing several bills on the calendar for the next day. The main substantive item was the conference committee report on House File 4252, the higher education finance and policy bill. Supporters said the bill included $3 million for identity verification systems to combat enrollment fraud or “ghost students,” $2.7 million to cover a shortfall in the Fostering Independence grant program for foster youth, and $5,000 for tree replacement at Bemidji State University. They also noted the bill did not address the larger state grant shortfall, which several members described as a structural problem. During debate, supporters emphasized the need to stop enrollment fraud and protect foster students’ access to higher education, while also praising the conference committee process and public deliberations. Opponents criticized the bill for failing to fix the state grant deficit and argued that Minnesota students were not being prioritized. After discussion, the House adopted the conference committee report, gave the bill its third reading, and then repassed House File 4252 as amended by conference by a vote of 101 yeas to 33 nays.