Transcript Highlights:

• This year, we're getting an unprecedented number of municipalities that are either scheduling or talking
• about scheduling override votes, and I know you're aware of this.
• This year, we're getting an unprecedented number of municipalities that are either scheduling or talking
• about scheduling override votes. and I know you're aware of this. scheduling or talking about scheduling
• It's on schedule. So you expect it this summer? July? Are we looking at July or August?

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Ways and Means

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The joint budget hearing opened the FY27 budget process with remarks from the Senate and House Ways and Means chairs, who described the fiscal outlook as challenging because of slow revenue growth, rising health care and other costs, and uncertainty from federal policy changes. Governor Healey and Secretary of Administration and Finance Matthew Gorzkowicz then presented House 2, a $62.8 billion budget that they said grows by about 1% and does not raise taxes or fees. They emphasized affordability, fiscal discipline, protection of core services, and continued investment in education, transportation, housing, child care, health care, and public safety. The administration also discussed a separate bill to delay and phase in certain federal tax-code changes from the so-called OB3 law, especially research and experimental expense provisions, to reduce immediate budget impacts and preserve competitiveness. A major portion of the hearing focused on education and municipal aid. The administration said House 2 provides about $7.6 billion for Chapter 70 aid, fully funds the final year of the Student Opportunity Act, increases special education circuit breaker funding, and raises rural school aid. Senators and representatives from both parties raised concerns that Chapter 70 and other aid formulas are not equitable for small, rural, and low-wealth communities and are not keeping pace with inflation, and several called for broader review of the formula and related funding streams. The governor and secretary said they are open to further discussion, pointed to additional support through rural aid, special education, transportation reimbursements, and minimum aid, and said total Student Opportunity Act investment would reach about $2.1 billion over the life of the law. Transportation, housing, and fair share spending were also central topics. The administration said fair share revenues are being used holistically, with education-heavy spending in the operating budget and transportation-heavy spending in the supplemental budget, and estimated the overall split to date at roughly 57% education and 43% transportation. They highlighted MBTA stabilization, regional transit authority support, microtransit, fare-free regional transit, and bridge and commuter rail investments, while noting the MBTA remains a major fiscal concern. On housing, the governor stressed production, permitting reform, ADUs, down-payment assistance, and support for public housing authorities, while lawmakers pressed for more funding for local housing authorities and for ways to address out-migration, energy costs, and affordability. The governor also said the administration will not withhold fire safety grants from communities over MBTA Communities Act noncompliance and will handle such issues case by case. No votes were taken at the hearing; it was an informational presentation and question-and-answer session.

Transcript Highlights:

• get into July, immediately into strategic planning retreats in July, but could not coordinate the schedule
• We hope to do it a little sooner, but schedules are pushing it into early fall.
• Committee, we're roughly scheduled for a break.
• times in different classrooms and that sort of stuff, a scheduler piece, those different programs.
• The Ad Astra, that's the facilities and classroom management software to help with the scheduling of

Committee: Joint Higher Education Institutions Committee

Summary: The Higher Education Institutions Committee met at NDSU and heard an extensive presentation from President David Cook/President Stewart and NDSU leadership on the university’s priorities, including enrollment, student success, research growth, and use of New Horizons funding. Leaders emphasized NDSU’s land-grant mission, its role in workforce development, and its goal of becoming more distinctive through strategic planning, recruitment and retention, commercialization, and partnerships. They highlighted that NDSU awarded 2,370 degrees in 2025, produces a large share of the state’s engineering, nursing, and agriculture graduates, and reported strong outcomes for graduates staying and working in North Dakota. They also noted enrollment headwinds, competition from other institutions, and the need to manage tuition waivers more carefully through a scholarship optimization effort. Provost Sherry Vale outlined academic stewardship efforts, including review or consolidation of low-producing programs, strategic hiring tied to institutional priorities, faculty workload policy changes, and expanded online and regional offerings. She said the university is using New Horizons dollars to strengthen advising, student support, and programs in engineering, agriculture, and health. NDSU leaders also described new or expanded academic offerings such as robotics and automation, artificial intelligence, material science and engineering, nuclear engineering certificates, accelerated nursing, nurse practitioner certificates, a Master of Health Administration, and a clinical research master’s program with Sanford Health. They stressed that these investments are intended to improve student completion, meet workforce needs, and increase return on public investment. The committee also heard testimony from students and recent graduates who described the value of NDSU’s education, mentorship, internships, research opportunities, and support services. Alyssa Hodges spoke about pharmacy education, public health work, and campus support as a parent and student; Ethan Blessy described engineering coursework, internships with Marvin, and career preparation; and Aiden Freolic discussed neuroscience research, federally funded projects, and plans for graduate study. Their testimony was followed by presentations on partnerships with Gateway to Science for K-12 STEM outreach and with Sanford Research on biomedical research, clinical trials, obesity research, and a joint biostatistics hire. NDSU also highlighted systemwide shared services, Governor’s School programming, and research growth, including a reported 8% increase in research expenditures from $199 million to $215 million. No bill votes were taken; the meeting was informational and featured presentations, testimony, and discussion of future planning and partnerships.

Transcript Highlights:

• Every day, we stay on the same schedule.
• Had been scheduled to testify in person? C. Stokes. I was supposed to be in person.
• Nisla Polanco here, had been scheduled to testify in person. C. Stokes.
• He graduated National Grid, got his uniform, schedule, and everything. You're ready to go to work.
• He graduated National Grid, got his uniform, schedule, and everything. You're ready to go to work.

Summary: The Special Commission on Correctional Consolidation and Collaboration met to approve prior minutes and then heard extensive testimony from people incarcerated or formerly incarcerated in county and state facilities, along with a few family/community perspectives. Much of the testimony focused on how county sheriff programs, reentry services, and step-down placements helped people obtain education, treatment, work experience, housing, IDs, and support for sobriety and family reunification. Witnesses from Hampshire, Barnstable, Hampden, and Franklin counties repeatedly described these programs as life-changing and credited staff with treating them with dignity, helping them prepare for release, and connecting them to community resources. Several witnesses contrasted county programming favorably with their experiences in DOC custody, saying DOC facilities often had overcrowding, limited access to programs, long waits, and little individualized reentry planning. Some said their sentence length or classification status made them ineligible for needed programs, while others described county facilities as more responsive and rehabilitative. A few witnesses also highlighted the value of culturally specific programming, educational blocks, restorative justice, and employment training. One witness from Hampden County described All-Exclusive Support Services as pivotal to her recovery and later employment with the sheriff’s office; another from Franklin County said the reentry center’s outside location made it easier to access help after release. Not all testimony was uniformly positive. A witness from Framingham described serious mental health needs that were not adequately addressed, saying she was offered superficial coping tools instead of counseling and that visitation restrictions for family members worsened her mental health. Another witness, a juvenile lifer, said long sentences and classification barriers limited access to meaningful programming and delayed preparation for release. Commissioners asked follow-up questions about DOC programming access, reentry preparation, visitation policies, and whether people were ready to benefit from services. No formal votes or policy actions were taken beyond approving the prior meeting minutes and moving through the testimony agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:28:48.559><c> this</c><00:28:48.960><c> we</c><00:28:49.279><c> are</c><00:28:49.440><c> scheduled
• </c><00:28:49.760><c> for</c> we do have this we are scheduled for we do have this we are scheduled for
• call of the chair for the purpose of introducing legislation, re-referring bills to committee, scheduling
• </c><01:59:58.400><c> hearings,</c><01:59:58.960><c> sending</c> committee, scheduling hearings, sending
• committee, scheduling hearings, sending and<01:59:59.520><c> receiving</c><02:00:00.000><c> messages

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• testifier's end, and in the event of a network failure, it may be necessary to reschedule a hearing or to schedule
• c><00:13:04.360><c> hearing</c><00:13:04.720><c> or</c><00:13:05.000><c> to</c><00:13:06.000><c> schedule
• </c><00:13:06.360><c> a</c> reschedule a hearing or to schedule a reschedule a hearing or to schedule
• She said they had estimated about $10 million in general, based on the most conservative fee schedule
• In the event of a network failure, it may be necessary to reschedule the hearing or schedule a meeting

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The joint hearing of the House Committees on Tourism and Water and Land was held on March 20, 2025, on SB 1396 SD3 HD1, which would raise transient accommodations tax revenues beginning in 2027, impose a $20 per-night tax on stays booked through loyalty or rewards points, and dedicate funds to DLNR for natural resource protection, management, and restoration. The Office of the Governor, DLNR, DBEDT, the Hawaii State Energy Office, Tax Department, Hawaiian Home Lands, HI-EMA, the Climate Advisory Team, Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority, HCDA, the Hawaii Ocean Legislative Task Force, Resource Legacy Fund, KUA, and the Hawaii Tourism Authority all testified in support or with comments, generally emphasizing the need for dedicated funding for environmental stewardship, resilience, wildfire and climate preparedness, and community-based projects. Several supporters cited polling showing broad visitor willingness to pay additional fees to protect Hawaiʻi’s resources, and DLNR and the Attorney General noted the bill aligns with broader state land-management and fire-safety priorities. Opposition came from the Tax Foundation of Hawaiʻi and the Maui Chamber of Commerce, which argued the bill unnecessarily raises the TAT, places more burden on visitors and visitor-dependent businesses, and could harm Maui’s still-recovering economy. The Activities and Attractions Association of Hawaiʻi initially marked opposition but then said it had misunderstood the bill’s relationship to another measure and asked to resend testimony. Expedia Group did not oppose the TAT increase itself but raised operational concerns about the new tax on loyalty-point redemptions, calling it novel and difficult to administer. The American Hotel Lodging Association and Hawaiʻi Hotel Alliance were listed as having no comments present. Testifiers also suggested amendments, including dedicating the revenues to a special fund, ensuring community grants, and clarifying administrative provisions. One testifier urged the bill be used to fund hurricane shelters and stronger building standards, while another emphasized that the measure should support people and disaster resilience as well as environmental protection. During questions, members asked for the polling methodology and for a breakdown of current TAT allocations; staff indicated they could share the survey memo and began identifying existing statutory remittances. No vote or final committee action was taken during the excerpted portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• We're on schedule. It's a three-year project.
• I just want to note, thank you for accommodating us in your schedule. Mr.
• Thank you for accommodating us in your schedule. Mr.
• And remember, we will work next Friday because of scheduling on the floor.
• We will work next Friday because of scheduling on the floor and so forth.

Bills: SB 1

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards

Summary: The committee began with Article I budget items for the Secretary of State. LBB staff outlined recommendations that would reduce the agency’s appropriation by about $40.3 million, including changes to HAVA funding, removal of one-time business system replacement money, and a rider directing the agency to use Fund 5095 first. Secretary Jane Nelson and staff then defended several exceptional items, especially additional staffing for elections and business filings, a new website, digitization of records, cybersecurity tools, and renovation of the James Earl Rudder Building. Members focused heavily on election administration, cross-checking voter rolls, Harris County complaints, call-center response times, and whether online voter registration should be expanded. No votes were taken; the discussion was informational and budget-focused. The committee then heard the Office of the Governor and trustee programs. LBB presented a recommended $2.4 million decrease for the governor’s office proper and a much larger decrease in trustee programs driven by one-time funding and unexpended balances, while still preserving major border security funding and victim assistance funding. Governor’s staff emphasized Texas’ economic growth, the importance of border security, and efforts to seek federal reimbursement for the roughly $11 billion Texas has spent on border operations. Members discussed whether shifting National Guard deployment to federal control could reduce state costs, and they also reviewed the music incubator program, the Governor’s University Research Initiative, and the semiconductor innovation consortium. Staff highlighted a $5 million late-added request for grants to protect nonprofits from violence and terrorism. Again, the exchange was largely explanatory, with no formal action. Finally, the committee took up the Texas Facilities Commission and lease payments for revenue bonds. LBB recommended major reductions overall, including removal of border wall construction funding and capital complex bond funding, but added money for higher utility costs, renovation of the Rudder Building, and additional facilities staff. George Purcell also noted stable maintenance-and-renewal funding and new riders related to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission building, tenant communications, and space utilization. For lease payments, LBB recommended a smaller appropriation tied to revenue-bond costs allocated across agencies. The discussion was informational, with members asking about the Rudder Building renovation, border wall progress, and capital complex construction timelines; no votes were recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• vulnerable adults are required to respond to emergencies at all times depending on the individual's scheduled
• vulnerable adults are required to respond to emergencies at all times depending on the individual's scheduled
• Um, in my previous role, I was a long term care administrator, and I can speak first hand how scheduling
• is just a uh first hand how scheduling is just a game<00:08:57.240><c> of</c><00:08:57.360><c> Jenga
• Um resident needs predictable schedule.

Bills: HF4110 , HF4101 , HF4144 , HF3546

Committee: House Human Services Finance and Policy

Keywords: workplace regulations, employee rights, meal breaks, rest breaks, exemptions, medical assistance, data matching, eligibility, reporting, human services, assisted living, health regulations, inspection authority, vulnerable adults, local government, program integrity, high-risk providers, enrollment requirements, fraud prevention, compliance

Transcript Highlights:

• It was, uh, a lot of conflict surrounding their schedule with six council members.
• And so, um, we are scheduled to begin racing this fall.
• And so, um, we are scheduled to begin racing this fall.
• And so, um, we are scheduled to begin racing this fall.
• </c> computers, get get meetings scheduled computers, get get meetings scheduled really<01:36:01.920>

Bills: SF0045 , SF0058 , SF0067

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Keywords: pari-mutuel wagering, simulcasting, historic horse racing, HHR terminals, horse racing, gaming commission, Wyoming Gaming Commission, local control, city approval, county approval, municipal approval, permit renewal, gaming permit, wagering regulation, racetrack, live pari-mutuel event, district court appeal, public notice, land use, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• That bill actually is scheduled to be heard today on the floor.
• That bill actually is scheduled to be heard today on the floor.
• That bill actually is scheduled to be heard today on the floor.
• That bill actually is scheduled to be heard today on the floor.
• Um, so we'll have to kind of schedule.

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It removes antiquated data collection, updates fee collection schedules, and consolidates definitions
• I tried my best to get you back on schedule. This is going to be a tough one.
• Way Park, like many... tried my best to get you back on tried my best to get you back on schedule.<01
• This is this is schedule. Thank you.
• I know you have a busy schedule, but I'd be happy to answer any questions that you might have or just

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Public Safety

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I cleared my schedule today and came from the Big Island to testify in opposition, unless there are going
• I cleared my schedule today and came from the Big Island to testify in opposition, unless there are going
• I cleared my schedule today and came from the Big Island to testify in opposition, unless there are going
• </c><00:57:06.520><c> today</c><00:57:06.880><c> of</c> so I cleared my my uh schedule today of so I
• cleared my my uh schedule today of my<00:57:07.240><c> work</c><00:57:07.480><c> so</c><00:57:07.640>

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Health and Human Services committee heard extensive testimony on HB 1194 HD2, a bill to regulate midwifery and require accredited education for licensed midwives. Supporters, including the Midwives Alliance of Hawaii, ACOG, a pediatrician, and several licensed midwives, argued the bill would improve maternal and newborn safety, clarify the definition of midwife, strengthen accountability, and align Hawaii with national education standards. They said accredited training is necessary to avoid gaps in knowledge and to support safe transfers and collaboration with hospitals. Opponents, including many midwives, parents, cultural practitioners, and community groups, argued the bill would restrict access to care, criminalize traditional and apprenticeship-based midwifery, and undermine reproductive autonomy and Native Hawaiian and other cultural birthing practices. Several asked for amendments to preserve a birth attendant exemption, the PET/portfolio pathway, and cultural and religious protections. Others said the bill would disproportionately harm rural, Indigenous, and low-income families by making training and licensure less accessible. The committee also heard testimony from state and county entities and professional organizations, with some standing on written testimony and others offering brief comments. The chair repeatedly reminded testifiers of the one-minute limit and the possibility that final decision-making would be deferred if quorum was lost. The transcript does not show a final vote or action taken during this segment.

Transcript Highlights:

• at MDA with an update on nitrates in southwest Minnesota water, and then we're going to move the schedule
• at MDA with an update on nitrates in southwest Minnesota water, and then we're going to move the schedule
• Thanks to additional support from the Clean Water Fund last session, work is scheduled to begin in the
• Thanks to additional support from the Clean Water Fund last session, work is scheduled to begin in the
• </c><00:10:21.680><c> to</c> fund last session work is scheduled to fund last session work is scheduled

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We can then figure out what our budget is and then really determine what the schedule of fees should
• </c> then really determine what the schedule then really determine what the schedule of<00:53:05.160>
• For committee members, I have scheduled next Wednesday. Tuesday's off, Thursday is a session day.
• I have now scheduled all bills.
• </c><04:09:09.760><c> all</c> different that I have now scheduled all different that I have now scheduled

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 451, which would create a postconsumer paint stewardship program in New Hampshire. Prime sponsor Representative Karen Ebel described the bill as a bipartisan, broadly supported model based on PaintCare programs used in other states. She said consumers and businesses could drop off leftover paint at participating retailers or municipal household hazardous waste sites, with the paint then collected and recycled by the stewardship organization. She emphasized that the program is intended to reduce landfill disposal, improper dumping, and contamination of groundwater and soil, while also helping municipalities save on hazardous waste handling costs. Members asked several questions about how the program would work and how it would be funded. Ebel explained that the program would be financed by a small fee charged at the point of sale on paint products, not a general sales tax, and that retailers could either list it separately or roll it into the price. She said the fee would cover the Department of Environmental Services’ administrative costs, which were described as minimal, and that the program’s structure was developed with DES and industry input. Questions also addressed whether cans would be recycled and how collected paint would be processed; Ebel said the ACA and PaintCare representatives could provide more detail, but that the paint and containers would be handled through recycling or other approved disposal methods rather than landfilled. Representative Judy Aron, a co-sponsor and chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, testified in support, saying the bill had been developed over several years with stakeholders and would keep toxic paint out of landfills while saving municipalities and taxpayers money. Representative Peter Bixby, the ranking member of Environment and Agriculture, also supported the bill, saying his committee had heard it many times and that it had strong bipartisan enthusiasm. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• We can see when they're scheduled House.
• We can see when they're scheduled for<00:57:49.040><c> hearing.
• , but Billy doesn't have that ability to alter his schedule maybe.
• , but Billy doesn't have that ability to alter his schedule maybe.
• , but Billy doesn't have that ability to alter his schedule maybe.

Committee: House Legislative Administration

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Bureau of Child Support Services has a weekly payment schedule.
• </c><00:06:30.800><c> My</c><00:06:31.120><c> work</c> weekly payment schedule.
• My work weekly payment schedule.
• and own payment own payment schedule and own payment plan<00:25:15.360><c> and</c><00:25:15.600><c>
• He came out with a scheduling order for grandparents' visitation.

Committee: Senate Children and Family Law

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, thank you, and welcome. schedule we try really hard to listen to schedule we try really hard to
• And again, if somebody's starting to have a schedule challenge, please let me know.
• Next week, we are scheduled to be here every day except Tuesday, and we are not here Tuesday because
• Next week, we are scheduled to be here every day except Tuesday, and we are not here Tuesday because
• Next week, we are scheduled to be here every day except Tuesday, and we are not here Tuesday because

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Finance Division 2 work session first took up HB 506, a bill dealing with the return of seized firearms. Members discussed how the measure would shift background-check processing for firearm returns through the Department of Safety, while the physical firearms would still remain with local police unless State Police had taken custody. The department said the bill would change which cases come to it, and members clarified that the bill concerns the background-check decision rather than possession of the firearms. The committee then voted OTP on HB 506 FN by a 7-0 roll call. The committee next discussed HB 671, establishing a kindergarten literacy readiness program. Department of Education staff explained that the bill grew out of a COVID-era Waterford contract that provided home-based early literacy support for families using federal relief funds, at a cost of about $600,000 per year, but that the program ended when those funds expired. Members raised concerns that the bill’s $1 appropriation was not realistic, that the prior program lacked sufficient outcome data, and that the references to ESSA tier-one benchmarks were unclear. The department said it was conducting a broader literacy needs assessment and updating the state literacy plan, including data from the zero-to-five range, K-5, and dyslexia-related work. Waterford representatives described the program as an early-literacy, pre-K readiness service for children ages zero to five, originally designed to work in homes with computers and internet provided where needed, and later expanded in some settings such as daycares and pre-K classrooms. They said the program used assessments at the beginning and end, had served hundreds of children, and was intended to support family engagement and kindergarten readiness. Despite that testimony, members remained concerned about funding and the lack of clear results, and one member moved to retain the bill for more information. The discussion ended with the bill retained rather than advanced.

Transcript Highlights:

• We don't want to use your fee schedule, and they often ask for waivers.
• We don't want to use your fee schedule, and they often ask for waivers.
• We don't want to use your fee schedule, and they often ask for waivers.
• We don't want to use your fee schedule, and they often ask for waivers.
• We don't want to use your fee schedule, and they often ask for waivers.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on a non-germane amendment to HB 297 that would create the Granite State Home Mitigation and Resiliency Program. Insurance Commissioner DJ Beton, joined by department staff, explained that the proposal is intended to help homeowners afford insurance by funding proactive home improvements that reduce risk and improve insurability. He said the program would be funded by the first $1 million collected annually from the insurance premium tax, with grants of up to $10,000 available on a first-come, first-served basis. Beton described the problem as rising homeowners insurance premiums, hard-market underwriting, nonrenewals, and the resulting shift to more expensive surplus lines coverage. He said eligible projects could include roof fortification, exterior improvements, flood-related foundation work, and removal of hazardous trees or limbs. He cited similar programs in other states, especially Alabama, Louisiana, and North Carolina, as evidence the model can work and noted that industry representatives were present in support. He also said the program would use means testing aligned with the Department of Energy’s weatherization program to target lower-income applicants. Members asked about the non-germane process, who would administer the program, and how the bill would prevent misuse of grant funds. The commissioner said the department would administer the program using one repurposed existing position, with Treasury handling fund flow through an MOU. Staff explained that applicants would have to show completed work through a signed contract, itemized work, and a sworn contractor affidavit, with some upfront payment allowed for materials and the remainder paid after completion. The chair and members discussed that the amendment is being attached to a different bill only to move the proposal through committee and on to House Finance for further consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• So on our schedule this morning, um, let's see, from 9:30 to 10:00 we are going to have a work session
• </c><00:08:18.879><c> this</c><00:08:19.319><c> morning</c> you so on our schedule this morning you so
• on our schedule this morning um<00:08:22.240><c> let's</c><00:08:22.440><c> see</c><00:08:22.680><c>
• Do you know, is there an established vaccine schedule for these animals in New Hampshire?
• I apologize for being behind in schedule.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first held a work session on HB 505, which would allow the sale of freeze-dried foods produced in homestead food operations. Members raised concerns about the bill’s broad language, especially the provision stating freeze-dried food would not be considered potentially hazardous. Several suggested narrowing the bill to specific products such as processed foods, berries, fruit, dairy products, ice cream, or vegetables, and requiring use of commercial freeze-drying equipment rather than dehydrators. There was also discussion of oxygen absorbers, moisture control, sanitation, and whether the issue should be handled in statute or rules. By the end of the discussion, members generally agreed the topic should be treated in a separate section of law rather than folded into the existing homestead food license, and the chair said the matter would be sent to the food safety subcommittee, with the possibility of a study committee if more time was needed. The committee then moved to HB 277, a technical correction to the animal cruelty statutes. Representative Bixby explained that current law refers to a “colt,” which applies only to male baby horses, leaving fillies unaddressed; the bill would replace “colt” with “foal” and make related wording changes so the restriction applies to any horse under 90 days old not being nursed by its dam. The New Hampshire Farm Bureau testified in support, saying the change was requested to clarify and modernize the statute and that the issue had been identified during work on related animal cruelty legislation. No votes were taken in the portion provided. The chair recessed the work session until 11:00 a.m. and announced that Representative Ktoa would take over the hearing on HB 277.

Transcript Highlights:

• that comes with working with third parties is that builders, contractors, and property owners can schedule
• Them and are not at the mercy of packed schedules that building departments often have.
• Having the ability to better forecast construction schedules and timelines will have a direct impact
• Added flexibility from a scheduling standpoint benefits everyone involved, and life safety remains the
• You can go to a city's code or fee schedule, oftentimes online, and you'll be able to have a list of

Committee: House Land & Resource Management

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• >> That reschedules cannabis to Schedule III from one, and it also...
• that that reschedules cannabis<01:01:48.319><c> to</c><01:01:48.880><c> schedule</c><01:01:49.359><c>
• It sought to schedule xylazine along with fentanyl and other drugs, and apparently there wasn't much
• It sought to schedule xylazine along with fentanyl and other drugs, and apparently there wasn't much
• It sought to schedule xylazine along with fentanyl and other drugs, and apparently there wasn't much

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Keywords: 1189, house, all